07.06.2014 Views

Kropotkin's Revolutionary Pamphlets - Libcom

Kropotkin's Revolutionary Pamphlets - Libcom

Kropotkin's Revolutionary Pamphlets - Libcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18.., KROPOTKIN'S REVOLUTIONARY PAMPHLETS<br />

political organization.<br />

Serfdom and absolute monarchy have<br />

always marched hand-in-hand. The one rendered the other<br />

a necessity. The same is true of capitalist rule, whose political<br />

form is representative government, either in a republic<br />

or in a monarchy. This is why socialism cannot utilize representative<br />

government as a weapon for liberating labor, just<br />

as it cannot utilize the church and its theory of divine right.<br />

or imperialism and Cresarism. with its theory of hierarchy of<br />

functionaries, for the same purpose.<br />

A new form of political organization has to be worked out<br />

the moment that socialist principles shall enter into our life.<br />

And it is self-evident that this new form will have to be mere<br />

popular, more decentralized, and nearer to the folk-mote set/­<br />

government than representative government can ever be.<br />

Knowing this, we cannot see a guarantee of progress in a<br />

still greater submission of all to the State. We seek progress<br />

in the fullest emancipation of the individual from the authority<br />

of the State; in the greatest development of individual<br />

initiative and in the limitation of all the governmental functions,<br />

but surely not in their extension. The march forward<br />

in political institutions appears to us to consist in abolishing<br />

in the first place the State authority which has fixed itself<br />

upon society and which now tries to extend its functions<br />

more and more ; and in the second place, in allowing the<br />

broadest possible development for the principle of free agreement,<br />

and in acknowledging the independence of all possible<br />

associations formed for definite ends, embracing in their<br />

federations the whole of society. The life of society itself we<br />

understand, not as something complete and rigid, but as<br />

something never perfect--something ever striving for new<br />

forms, and ever changing these forms in accordance with the<br />

needs of the time.<br />

This is what life is in nature.<br />

Such a conception of human progress and of what we think<br />

desirable in the future (what, in our opinion, can increase the<br />

sum of happiness) leads us inevitably to our own special<br />

tactics in the struggle. It induces us to strive for the greatest<br />

possible development of personal initiative in every indi-<br />

MODERN SCIENCE AND ANARCHISM<br />

vidual and group, and to secure unity of action, not through<br />

discipline. but through the unity of aims and the mutual<br />

confidence which never fail to develop when a great number<br />

of persons have consciously embraced some common idea.<br />

Then we assert and endeavor to prove that it devolves upon<br />

every new economic form of social life to develop its own<br />

new form of political relations. It has been so in the past,<br />

and so it undoubtedly will be in the future. New forms are<br />

already germinating all round.<br />

Feudal right and autocracy, or at least the almost unlimited<br />

power of a czar or a king, have moved hand in hand in his·<br />

tory. They depended on each other in this development.<br />

Exactly in the same way the rule of the capitalists has evolved<br />

its own characteristic political order-representative government-both<br />

in strictly centralized monarchies and in repub.<br />

lics.<br />

Socialism. whatever may be the form in which it will appear,<br />

and in whatever degree it may approach to its unavoidable<br />

goal,-communism.-will also have to choose its Q'Uln<br />

form of political structure. Of the old form it cannot make<br />

use no more than it could avail itself of the hierarchy of the<br />

chch or of autocracy. The State bureaucracy and centralization<br />

are as irreconcilable with socialism as was autocracy<br />

with capitalist rule. One way or another, socialism must<br />

become more popular, more communalistic, and less dependent<br />

upon indirect government through elected representatives.<br />

It must become more self-gaverning.<br />

Besides, when we closely observe the modern life of France,<br />

Spain, England and the United States, we notice in these<br />

countries the evident tendency to form into groups of entirely<br />

independent communes, towns and villages, which would<br />

combine by means of free federation, in order to satisfy innumerable<br />

needs and attain certain immediate ends. In actual<br />

life this tendency manifests itself in thousands of attempts<br />

at organization outside the State, fully independent<br />

of it; as well as in attempts to take hold of various functions<br />

which had been previously usurped by the State and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!