Using Cluster Analysis for Peer Selection - University Analysis and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

10 Existing Peer Institutions � George Mason University � Georgia State University � San Diego State University � State University of New York, Albany � University of Delaware Using Cluster Analysis in Peer Selection � University of Houston System � University of Louisville � University of Wisconsin-- Milwaukee � Wayne State University � Western Michigan University October 15, 2002
11 CUMU Universities � Boise State U � Brooklyn College – � The City U of New York � California State U - Fresno � California State U - Hayward � California State U - Sacramento � California State U - San Bernardino � Cleveland State U � Eastern Michigan U � Florida Atlantic U � Florida International U � Georgia State U � Hunter College, � The City U of New York � Indiana U Northwest � Indiana U - Purdue � Kean U � Kennesaw State U � Metropolitan State U – Denver � Northern Kentucky U � Oakland U � Pace U � Portland State U � Purdue U - Calumet � San Jose State U � Simon Fraser U - International Affiliate � Southern Illinois U - Edwardsville � Southwest Missouri State U � Southwest Texas State U � Towson U � U of Alaska at Anchorage � U of Arkansas at Little Rock � U of Central Florida � U of Central Oklahoma � U of Houston - Downtown � U of Houston System � U of Illinois at Chicago � U of Louisville � U of Maryland College Park � U of Maryland System Using Cluster Analysis in Peer Selection � U of Massachusetts at Boston � U of Missouri - Kansas City � U of Missouri - St. Louis � U of Nebraska at Omaha � U of Nevada - Las Vegas � U of North Carolina at Charlotte � U of North Carolina at Greensboro � U of North Florida � U of North Texas � U of South Carolina - Spartanburg � U of South Florida � U of Tennessee at Chattanooga � U of Texas at San Antonio � U of Western Sydney-Nepean - International Affiliate � Virginia Commonwealth U � Washburn U � Washington State U- Spokane � Washington State U- Vancouver � Wright State U � York U - International Affiliate October 15, 2002
Page 1 and 2: Using Cluster Analysis in Peer Sele
Page 3 and 4: 3 The University of Central Florida
Page 5 and 6: 5 UCF Mission � The University of
Page 7 and 8: 7 How Do We Know If UCF Is Leading?
Page 9: 9 Phased Structure � Initial Iden
Page 13 and 14: 13 Institutions Considered for Anal
Page 15 and 16: 15 Primary Data Sources � Populat
Page 17 and 18: 17 Screening Phase Variables � P-
Page 19 and 20: 19 Methodology—Cluster Analysis
Page 21 and 22: 21 Sample Output-Cluster Membership
Page 23 and 24: 23 Sample Output-ANOVA ANOVA Cluste
Page 25 and 26: 25 Sample Output-Proximity Matrix P
Page 27 and 28: 27 Representative Dendrogram * * *
Page 29 and 30: 29 Synthesis of Screening Phase �
Page 31 and 32: 31 Synthesis of Refinement Phase
Page 33 and 34: 33 Representative Dendrogram * * *
Page 35 and 36: 35 Similar Peers Selected Data (199
Page 37 and 38: 37 Near-Peers Selected Data (1999)
Page 39 and 40: 39 Other MRU Peers Selected Data (1
Page 41 and 42: 41 Implementation and Use � Offic

Using Cluster Analysis for Peer Selection - University Analysis and ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?