14.06.2014 Views

Amherst College, Bard College, Barnard College, Bates College ...

Amherst College, Bard College, Barnard College, Bates College ...

Amherst College, Bard College, Barnard College, Bates College ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong>, <strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong>, <strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong>,<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong>, Bowdoin <strong>College</strong>, Bryn Mawr<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Bucknell University, Carleton 2010 <strong>College</strong>,<br />

Centre Sustainability <strong>College</strong>, Colby Reporting <strong>College</strong>, of Colgate the<br />

Top 50 Liberal Arts Cross, <strong>College</strong>s* Colorado<br />

Pacific Sustainability Index Scores<br />

vidson <strong>College</strong>,<br />

A benchmarking tool for online sustainability reporting<br />

ollege, Franklin<br />

n University,<br />

lege, Hamilton<br />

ge, Haverford<br />

yette <strong>College</strong>,<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Mount<br />

ge, Occidental<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Reed<br />

cripps <strong>College</strong>,<br />

uth, Skidmore<br />

Olaf <strong>College</strong>,<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Union<br />

cademy, United<br />

ssar <strong>College</strong>,<br />

Helping Commerce<br />

ity, Help Wellesley<br />

Nature<br />

* Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong> intentionally omitted from the rankings<br />

hitman <strong>College</strong>,<br />

J. Emil Morhardt, Elgeritte Adidjaja, Bianca Garcia, Bukola Jimoh, Daria Dulan, Elizabeth Perez, Gracie Beck, Jacyln T. D'Arcy, Jaleesa D. Parks,<br />

Quentin Jones, Joseph Bryan Swartley, Marcia Marcella McWilliams, Marissa L. Garvin, Markus Kessler, Rishabh Rajen Parekh, Tigist Kassahun,<br />

and Timothy M. Fine.


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Contents<br />

Topics<br />

Page<br />

<strong>College</strong> Ranking 3<br />

Director’s Foreword 4<br />

Student Involvement 5<br />

Landscaping 6<br />

Green Buildings 7<br />

Food Recycling and Purchasing 8<br />

Green Purchasing 9<br />

Transportation Initiatives 10<br />

Community Development 11<br />

PSI Overview 12<br />

PSI Scoring in a Nutshell 13<br />

Environmental Intent Topics 14<br />

Environmental Reporting Topics 15<br />

Social Intent Topics 16<br />

Social Reporting Topics 17<br />

Environmental Intent Element of the PSI<br />

18<br />

Scores<br />

Environmental Reporting Element of the PSI 19<br />

Scores<br />

Social Intent Element of the PSI Scores 20<br />

Social Reporting Element of the PSI Scores 21<br />

Environmental Intent Scores Ranking 22<br />

Environmental Reporting Scores Ranking 23<br />

Environmental Performance Scores Ranking 24<br />

Social Intent Scores Ranking 25<br />

Social Reporting Scores Ranking 26<br />

Social Performance Scores Ranking 27<br />

Visual Cluster Analysis 28<br />

Company Rankings Based on the Number of 30<br />

Goals Reported<br />

Company Rankings Based on the Better<br />

31<br />

Performance Reported<br />

Analyst’s Comments, alphabetically listed by 32<br />

company name<br />

Questions should be addressed to:<br />

Dr. J. Emil Morhardt, Director<br />

(emorhardt@cmc.edu)<br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

925 N. Mills Ave. Claremont, CA 91711-5916, USA<br />

Direct line: (909) 621-8190<br />

Elgeritte Adidjaja, Research Fellow: (909) 621-8698<br />

(eadidjaja@cmc.edu)<br />

Departmental secretaries: (909) 621-8298<br />

The Roberts Environmental Center has been the foremost<br />

analyst of corporate sustainability reporting for over a<br />

decade. We analyze corporate online disclosure using our<br />

Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) and publish the results on<br />

this website.<br />

Industrial Sector** 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Aerospace and<br />

X<br />

defense<br />

Airlines<br />

X<br />

Banks, Insurance<br />

X<br />

Chemicals X X X<br />

Computer, Office<br />

X<br />

Equipment, and<br />

Services<br />

Consumer Food, Food<br />

X X X<br />

Production, &<br />

Beverages<br />

Electronics and<br />

X X X<br />

Semiconductors<br />

Energy and Utilities* X X X<br />

Entertainment<br />

X<br />

Food Services<br />

X<br />

Forest and Paper<br />

X X X<br />

Products<br />

General Merchandiser<br />

X<br />

Homebuilders<br />

X<br />

Industrial and Farm<br />

X<br />

X<br />

Equipment<br />

Mail, Freight, &<br />

X<br />

Shipping<br />

Medical Products &<br />

X<br />

Equipment<br />

Metals, Mining, Crude<br />

X<br />

Oil*<br />

Metals<br />

X<br />

Mining, Crude Oil<br />

X<br />

Motor Vehicle and X X X<br />

Parts<br />

Oil and Gas Equipment<br />

X<br />

Petroleum and Refining X X<br />

Pharmaceuticals X X X X<br />

Scientific, Photo, &<br />

X<br />

Control Equipment<br />

Telecommunications,<br />

X<br />

Network, &<br />

Peripherals<br />

Utilities, Gas, and<br />

X<br />

Electric<br />

* Multiple-sector category was separated in later years.<br />

**As of February 2010.<br />

The goal of corporate report analysis conducted by the Roberts<br />

Environmental Center is to acquaint students with environmental and<br />

social issues facing the world’s industries, and the ways in which<br />

industry approaches and resolves these issues. The data presented in<br />

this report were collected by student research assistants and a<br />

research fellow at the Roberts Environmental Center. Copyright 2010 ©<br />

by J. Emil Morhardt. All rights reserved.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

2


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s*<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

W esleyan University<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Colgate University<br />

W ashington and Lee University<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> Rankings<br />

33.81 39.77<br />

30.74<br />

30.68<br />

28.81<br />

27.81<br />

27.11<br />

27.07<br />

26.85<br />

26.37<br />

26.15<br />

26.11<br />

25.06<br />

25.02<br />

24.76<br />

24.63<br />

24.54<br />

24.06<br />

23.76<br />

22.67<br />

22.11<br />

21.89<br />

21.76<br />

21.61<br />

20.80<br />

20.54<br />

20.19<br />

19.76<br />

19.49<br />

19.06<br />

18.71<br />

18.54<br />

18.15<br />

18.06<br />

18.02<br />

17.09<br />

16.01<br />

15.97<br />

15.58<br />

15.45<br />

15.14<br />

14.53<br />

14.19<br />

13.05<br />

12.00<br />

11.84<br />

10.62<br />

8.44<br />

6.01<br />

5.05<br />

3.39<br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

This report is an analysis of the voluntary environmental and social reporting<br />

of colleges* on the U.S. News and World Report's <strong>College</strong>s and Universities<br />

rankings. Data were collected from corporate websites during the initial<br />

analysis period in the Fall of 2009.<br />

*Intentionally omitting Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong> which ranks 11th on the U.S. News and World Report list.<br />

A+<br />

A-<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D-<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Colgate University<br />

Washington and Lee University<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

3


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Director’s Foreword<br />

This is our second sector report on <strong>College</strong> and University sustainability reporting. The first,<br />

in 2007, covered only a few institutions, all we could find that mentioned the subject on their<br />

websites. In just three years there has been a revolution with just about every institution we<br />

look at addressing the issues, and many having extensive coverage. In fact so many of<br />

these institutions are reporting we have decided to produce separate reports on the top 50<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s and the top 50 American national universities, based on U.S. News<br />

and World Report 2009 rankings. We have omitted our own institution (which is ranked 11 th<br />

by U.S. News and World Report) not because we think our reporting is inferior, but because<br />

we don’t think that we should be the ones judging it.<br />

One question that might come to mind, particularly since so many colleges are now<br />

reporting, is why Williams <strong>College</strong>, which we ranked highest, only receives 40% of the<br />

possible points on our metric, the Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI), when the top-ranked<br />

companies receive 60% or more?<br />

Part of the answer is that the scholarly institutions are marching to a different drummer. Industry has almost universally<br />

adopted the sustainability reporting guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), an international industry-supported effort<br />

to specify appropriate reporting in excruciating detail for just about every conceivable aspect of environmental and social<br />

corporate activity. Even though the PSI does not map the GRI guidelines very closely, it does address most of the issues<br />

covered by GRI, many of which are hardly ever mentioned by colleges.<br />

<strong>College</strong>s, on the other hand, seem not to have heard of GRI, and seem instead to be driven by the Association for Advancement<br />

of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) and the associated American <strong>College</strong> & University Presidents Climate<br />

Commitment (ACUPCC), as well as the Sustainability Endowments Institute (SEI) and its <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card at<br />

greenreportcard.org.<br />

The GRI G3 reporting guidelines cover a lot more ground than these college-specific efforts, in particular information about<br />

manufacturing (in which most institutions of higher learning do not engage), and social responsibility to employees and external<br />

communities (in which colleges are certainly engaged, but report externally only haphazardly). Furthermore, students are<br />

not employees, and faculty are often treated differently than staff, so there tend to be multiple codes of conduct, different sorts<br />

of benefits, and different demographics, decreasing further the parallels with business enterprises and complicating the<br />

process of GRI-style reporting even if colleges were so inclined.<br />

So, the PSI covers more ground than colleges normally consider reporting, and it lacks the emphasis on fiscal transparency<br />

that makes up a third of SEI’s <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card grade. Finally, the PSI is based entirely on the material freely<br />

available on college web sites, while the <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card depends entirely on completion of a detailed<br />

questionnaire. We have looked at the detailed questionnaires for all of the colleges that chose to make them publicly available<br />

on greenreportcard.com, and the level of sophistication in filling them out appears to be about as variable as the inclusion of<br />

sustainability information on college web sites.<br />

In other words, even colleges that attempt to report their sustainability, either online or in response to questionnaires, are often<br />

not very good at it. We judge that neither the PSI nor the <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card does a good job yet at capturing the<br />

actual sustainability of colleges. This will change as external grading becomes more widely cited, providing stronger incentives<br />

for high quality sustainability reporting and performance.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt, Ph.D.<br />

Roberts Professor of Environmental Biology<br />

Director, Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Claremont, California<br />

January 22, 2010<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

4<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Student Involvement<br />

By: Markus Kessler & Tigist Kassahun<br />

In 2009, students at the nation’s top Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s exhibited a genuine commitment to sustainability through<br />

involvement in and leadership of organizations, initiatives, and achievements. Like movements in the past, students<br />

today play an important role in colleges and universities nationwide committing them to a more sustainable future.<br />

It is largely the ambition and passion of students that creates institutional change in the college communities. Here<br />

is just a glance at how a few college students are leading the way in student involvement on their campuses.<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong> has a diverse array of student-initiated and managed programs, organizations, and<br />

sustainability positions in which students are portrayed as major players in sustainability programs. Student<br />

groups include the Gettysburg Environmental Concerns Organization and Gettysburg Research and Action by<br />

Students for Sustainability. Student environment leaders at Gettysburg <strong>College</strong> were vital in developing the<br />

campus-wide Sustainability Advisory Committee, initiating the college-wide compost program, authoring a<br />

seventeen page campus-wide sustainability proposal, creating and managing the Painted Turtle farm, which<br />

provides produce for the local food bank and the campus Dining Center, and creating the R3 House, where<br />

residents commit to reducing, reusing, and recycling. Additionally, first year students are introduced to<br />

sustainability initiatives by student leaders upon their arrival on campus. These are only a few of numerous<br />

initiatives students at Gettysburg have been involved with to commit to a more sustainable future.<br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong> is another example of the important role student involvement plays in maintaining an<br />

environmentally responsible campus community. Bowdoin has a great campus group called EcoReps. Students fill<br />

these positions and function as liaisons between the students and the administration on campus-related<br />

environmental issues. This program has been very successful in addressing and prompting sustainable living<br />

practices, especially within first year dorms. The student-run organization, Sustainable Bowdoin, meets monthly to<br />

discuss and implement sustainable initiatives. Some of the campus’ sustainable practices such as the campus<br />

composting program were initiated by Sustainable Bowdoin. Additionally, as a means of promoting green living,<br />

the campus has three EcoMascots whose visible campus presence reminds students of their ability to contribute<br />

to a greener future.<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong> cultivates an environment committed to sustainability, and this is exceedingly clear through the<br />

involvment of the student body. Pomona’s student-run Green Bikes program loans bikes to students for free at the<br />

beginning of each semester and runs a sustainable repair shop year round. The program also offers workshops<br />

and events to promote and educate about the use of alternative and green modes of transportation. Pomona’s<br />

unique Sustainability Action Fellowship provides the opportunity for students to be involved in coordinating<br />

sustainability outreach and researching other campus’ sustainable efforts in order to better Pomona’s green goals.<br />

The student held position must be applied for and can also count for one full course credit.<br />

The Clean Sweep and ReCoop initiative was started by Pomona students and has radically reduced Pomona’s<br />

waste production. Students involved in Clean Sweep spend two weeks collecting thousands of items left in the<br />

residence halls at the end of each school year. The items collected in this process are sold through Pomona’s<br />

ReCoop, which puts on a large sale at the beginning of the year and maintains an on-campus store for the<br />

remainder of the school year.<br />

Examples of original, zealous, and effective student involvement in sustainability efforts such as these can serve as<br />

truly inspiring influences to other colleges, as well as to other college students.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

5<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Landscaping<br />

By: Joe Swartley<br />

Different ways of landscaping can greatly affect the sustainability of a college and its efforts to become more<br />

environmentally conscious. In the analysis of the top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s we saw a great variety of initiatives<br />

being implemented across the nation to reduce use of water, fertilizer, and pesticide and to utilize more native<br />

plant species that fit the specific region and climate of the campus. Many of these projects are very simple and<br />

require few changes to make an impact, while others involve a complete transformation of landscaping techniques<br />

and often have a more significant impact. Sustainable grounds management and landscaping has taken large<br />

leaps over the past few years and colleges seem to be applying these practices in light of both financial and<br />

environmental concerns.<br />

The most obvious changes that campuses are making involve water usage and irrigation efficiency. For example,<br />

in 2007, Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong> issued a report estimating that over half of its water usage was unnecessary. To<br />

tackle this problem the college switched many of its sprinkler systems to drip lines and continues to do so. Since<br />

their implementation, the school has saved an average of eight million gallons of water per year, enough to fill over<br />

12 Olympic-sized swimming pools. This drip irrigation system, along with many of the drip lines put in place on<br />

campuses, is situated underground so it can feed water directly to the plant roots and is connected to a central<br />

computer and weather station that monitors soil conditions. The computer can calculate how much watering is<br />

necessary for each line system based on real-time humidity, rainfall, wind, and moisture content in the soil.<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong> operates and maintains a unique and sustainable water system that reuses all grey water from<br />

indoor facilities such as toilets, sinks, and showers. Oberlin’s “Living System” processes this wastewater through<br />

natural purification methods used by wetlands and methods used by municipal wastewater treatment facilities.<br />

Water processed through this system is reused in the college’s toilets and irrigation. Treatment systems such as<br />

this can recycle thousands of gallons of water per day, thus saving the college money and minimizing its<br />

environmental impact.<br />

Native plants are another crucial element of sustainable landscaping on college campuses. The wave to plant<br />

more native (and often times more drought-tolerant) species of plants has reduced water usage during irrigation,<br />

helped to battle invasive-species, promoted healthier vegetation, and created a home for native animals and<br />

insects around the campus. By returning a habitat to its former state, low-maintenance ecological systems can<br />

prosper. Native plants are already adapted to the climate and are programmed to survive through dry summers<br />

and wet winters without extensive irrigation or fertilizer or pesticide use.<br />

The majority of the colleges analyzed practice Integrated Pest Management (IPM) as a means of grounds<br />

maintenance. IPM is a widely used strategy to deal with landscape and structural pests while drastically reducing<br />

the use of pesticides that may harm the environment, people, or surrounding property. This approach involves pest<br />

prevention, observation, and intervention. If pests reach an unacceptable level, physical actions (hand picking,<br />

mulching, pruning, etc.) are used to eradicate or control the pest. Biological controls (introduction of beneficial<br />

insects, fungi, nematodes, etc.) are then used if other actions did not work, followed by chemical controls<br />

(pesticides) as a last resort. IPM has been in use for over 30 years and continues to evolve into a more sustainable<br />

and ecological approach that works to maintain healthy plant systems. As colleges experiment with IPM and<br />

landscaping techniques specific to their campuses, they can envision a more sustainable future.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

6<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Green Buildings<br />

By: Jaclyn D’Arcy & Charles Butler<br />

<strong>College</strong>s around the United States are investing in green buildings to reduce their carbon footprints. From low-flow<br />

showers and toilets to geothermal and solar thermal heating systems, colleges are making an effort to decrease<br />

greenhouse gas emissions. Through certifications like LEED, Green Seal, and Energy Star, colleges can be<br />

evaluated by third party regulators and to encourage sustainable practices.<br />

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design—LEED—is a rating system created and used by the Unites States<br />

Green Building Council (USGBC) to rate levels of environmental sustainability in construction. Ratings are based on<br />

a point system in which buildings receive a point for each prerequisite they complete. Prerequisites review water<br />

efficiency, sustainable practices on the construction site, efficient energy use, source of materials and other<br />

resources, indoor environmental quality, and innovative building design techniques. The specific criteria change<br />

depending on the type of buildings being constructed and are constantly being updated. LEED certifications are<br />

available for new constructions, older buildings, homes, schools, neighborhood developments, and a variety of<br />

other buildings. If a college wishes to have a LEED inspection, it simply submits a report to the USGBC and waits<br />

for the report to be reviewed. Building may receive a platinum LEED, gold LEED, silver LEED, or bronze LEED<br />

certification, depending on points received in the report.<br />

Most <strong>College</strong>s and Universities are building new LEED-certified buildings and renovate current buildings to meet<br />

LEED standards. Some colleges prefer to focus on the source of the building material and use local products to<br />

help improve the environment, while others focus on efficiently using natural resources. For example, Middlebury<br />

<strong>College</strong> was able to purchase 80% of its construction materials as recycled or reclaimed. <strong>College</strong>s compete to<br />

have the highest LEED certification and the most LEED certified buildings. In some cases they incorporate<br />

sustainable practices not included in the official LEED list. <strong>College</strong>s understand that a more environmentally<br />

friendly work and living environment will ensure healthier more productive students. Some colleges use Green<br />

Seal products and Energy Star devices to help satisfy some LEED prerequisites and to improve the overall<br />

sustainability efforts of the college.<br />

Green Seal is an independent non-profit third party certification organization that certifies environmentally<br />

sustainable products for the marketplace. Products that have the Green Seal Label have undergone an intense<br />

review to discover what their impact will be on the environment and quality of human life. The review focuses on<br />

the entire lifecycle of the products from the harvesting of the resource necessary to construct them until the<br />

product are discarded.<br />

<strong>College</strong>s wanting to discourage non-green consumption frequently purchase as many Green Seal product as<br />

possible. Green Seal products seem to work just as well if not better than other products but with significantly<br />

fewer health risks because of a reduction in toxins.<br />

Energy Star is a certification given to products that are deemed to use energy efficiently. This certification is based<br />

on a set of criteria agreed to by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Department<br />

of Energy. The specific set of criteria varies from product to product. Energy Star products use less energy than<br />

their conventional counterparts, allowing colleges to redirect these resources into other programs to help improve<br />

the quality of the school. <strong>College</strong>s sometimes reduce their carbon footprints in ways not included in certification<br />

processes, for example, by planting gardens on the roofs of their buildings to increase insulation and be visibly<br />

“green”. Whether it is new building projects, renovation of existing dorms and building, or just replacing<br />

incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent ones and using eco-friendly cleaning products, colleges are<br />

recognizing the importance of green building and purchasing and are instilling these decisions into their students.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

7<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Food Recycling and Purchasing<br />

By: Marissa Garvin and Quentin Jones<br />

The colleges leading in sustainability have implemented formal policies encouraging local food purchasing, and<br />

many also purchase food from organic providers including those specifying “cage-free eggs”, “confinement-free<br />

meat products”, and “hormone and antibiotic-free dairy products.” “Fair Trade Certified” products are imported<br />

from developing countries at a higher price to promote sustainability there. Putting these labels on the food<br />

products brings increased awareness to students of sustainable food purchasing and growing practices. Some<br />

colleges have their own gardens or farms on or near campus that provide some food to the dining halls. Excess<br />

prepared food is donated to soup kitchens or other organizations where it will not go to waste. Dining facilities are<br />

almost all becoming “tray-less” to decrease the amount of waste per individual and the costs of washing trays.<br />

Dishware that is disposable is often made of “post-consumer recycled content” and is biodegradable or<br />

compostable. Used cooking oil is processed into bio-diesel fuel, which emits less particulate matter than<br />

petroleum diesel fuel and is nominally "carbon-neutral" to the degree it is of plant origen. Materials that market<br />

dining facilities are printed on recycled paper. Napkins are made from recycled paper and dispensed one-at-atime<br />

to minimize waste.<br />

Student sustainability coordinators often facilitate ongoing student dialogue on how to become more<br />

environmentally sustainable and act as ambassadors for new sustainable initiatives. Sustainability councils can<br />

create policies intended to decrease the impact of the dining facilities on the world at large. An interesting<br />

program tried by Sewanee <strong>College</strong> is an inter-dorm competition to reduce overall waste through both food<br />

composting and office recycling. Comments and suggestions on sustainability are solicited via e-mail and<br />

responses are displayed at dining facilities. The colleges can set criteria to ensure a margin of sustainable<br />

practice for a potential supplier. Dining facilities offer financial incentive for individuals to utilize reusable<br />

containers.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

8<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Green Purchasing<br />

By: Daria Dulan<br />

Green purchasing is the affirmative selection and promotion of products and services that most effectively<br />

minimize negative environmental impacts over their life cycles. Some examples are products and processes that<br />

conserve energy and water, minimize waste and release of pollutants, and use energy from renewable resources.<br />

Others are products that are manufactured from recycled materials, that can be reused or recycled, and use<br />

alternatives to hazardous or toxic chemicals and radioactive materials.<br />

It is important that our higher education institutions practice and promote green purchasing in order to lead the<br />

communities surrounding them by example. The colleges reviewed in this report have almost all made some kind of<br />

commitment to be more sustainable and one easy and cost-efficient way of doing so is to practice green<br />

purchasing. Green purchasing at the colleges occurs in many forms, from having a budget to purchase locally<br />

grown foods in the dining halls to providing Energy Star light bulbs to students and faculty.<br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong> is an example of minimal, yet significant, practices of green purchasing. When possible, all<br />

student room renovation projects use Energy Star appliances, low VOC paints, low or formaldehyde-free millwork,<br />

linoleum flooring, recycled glass countertops, occupancy sensors, and low flow toilets and shower heads. In<br />

addition, the Department of Residential Life has established a sole vendor program with a company that has a set<br />

of eco-friendly operating guidelines for the purchase of residential hall furniture. There is not much information<br />

describing <strong>Barnard</strong>’s promotion of green purchasing to the students.<br />

Haverford, on the other hand, goes beyond expectations when it comes to practicing green purchasing on campus.<br />

Over half of Haverford <strong>College</strong>’s fleet consists of golf carts, which are electric and its faculty and staff are offered<br />

pretax incentives on public transportation. Haverford has a committee dedicated to holding people on campus<br />

accountable for progressing towards sustainability. There is also a student garden at Haverford in which compost<br />

from the dining halls is collected and added to the soil. Also in the student dining halls, locally processed foods<br />

account for about one-third of the college’s food budget.<br />

It is common for schools to change the types of paper they purchase when practicing green purchasing. For<br />

instance, Most of Hamilton's high-volume, high-end publications printed off-campus are now Forest Stewardship<br />

Council (FSC) certified, printed on recycled paper stock containing post-consumer waste (PCW). FSC certification<br />

is the "gold standard" in printing and sustainability. In order to be FSC certified, the publication must follow a<br />

stringent "chain-of-custody" from the forest, to the paper manufacturer, to the paper merchant, to the printer. In<br />

addition, all of the copy paper used in printers and copiers across campus is 100 percent recycled.<br />

There are many other things that are common among this group of colleges when it comes to promoting green<br />

purchasing to students. On many of the websites, there are lists of appliances or materials that are energy efficient<br />

and the schools encourage their students to buy these products as opposed to other, less efficient products.<br />

Overall, green purchasing is an important aspect of sustainability and it is one of the easiest ways to get everyone<br />

involved in becoming more sustainable.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

9<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Transportation Initiatives<br />

By: Bukola Jimoh & Grace Beck<br />

Just as many corporate businesses are undertaking sustainable transportation initiatives to minimize their<br />

environmental impact, colleges too are expanding on their “green” transportation options. After scoring the Top 50<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s in 2009 using each college’s web pages and the PSI database, we were able to determine<br />

which colleges are putting the most effort and money into sustainable transportation options for students and<br />

faculty.<br />

Every college on the list claimed to have several alternative transportation programs. The most common of these<br />

includes Zipcar, a program through which students can rent a hybrid vehicle by the hour or day. This program<br />

provides a sustainable transportation option to those students who don’t have cars on campus. In addition,<br />

student-run bike rental and repair programs are a norm at almost every college on the list. Most schools, such as<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong>, have “green” bike programs through which bikes can be checked out by the day or week. At<br />

some schools, these bike rental programs are free of charge in order to encourage students to bike around<br />

campus rather than drive. At others, the costs are minimal.<br />

Many colleges with large campuses or harsh weather conditions, such as Colgate <strong>College</strong>, provide a free shuttle<br />

service around campus for students and faculty. Most of these shuttles are equipped with EPA-approved lowemission<br />

diesel engines or run on biodiesel, both of which are green alternatives to petroleum. In general, the top<br />

50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s are headed in the right direction in terms of their green transportation initiatives. Some<br />

colleges in particular, however, are paving the way towards the improvement of alternative transportation on<br />

college campuses.<br />

The Claremont <strong>College</strong>s, for example, offer monetary incentives to employees who walk, bicycle, use public<br />

transportation, or carpool to work. This practice encourages employees to cut down on their individual carbon<br />

footprints, which in turn cuts down on the colleges’ overall environmental impact. Similarly, Smith <strong>College</strong> initiated<br />

a “parking opt-out” program that pays faculty and staff not to drive to work. Smith also provides discounted<br />

parking permits to carpool groups at one-fifth of the cost of a regular permit. Another notable program is Smith<br />

<strong>College</strong>’s “Bicycle Kitchen.” Unlike other bike-sharing programs now common at Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s, Smith’s<br />

program rents bicycles to students for the entire semester for $15. The program allows students to have easy,<br />

cheap continuous access to emissions-free transportation. In total, approximately 22% of Smith <strong>College</strong>’s faculty<br />

and staff use more-sustainable forms of transportation. Like Smith <strong>College</strong>, Macalester <strong>College</strong> offers incentives to<br />

students and faculty who carpool. The college designates priority parking spaces for low-emission vehicles and<br />

carpoolers. Along with offering subsidized bus passes and restricting student-parking permits, these initiatives<br />

help Macalester toward its goal to reduce single-occupancy vehicles by at least 50% by 2025.<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong>’s Biodiesel Project is another noteworthy transportation initiative. The student-run project<br />

recycles waste vegetable oil from nearby restaurants into biofuel for biodiesel vehicles. Union <strong>College</strong> also<br />

participates in a biofuel project by recycling waste oil used in dining services. Union college estimates that the<br />

recycling of waste oil diverts hundreds of gallons of waste oil from landfills to “clean, closed loop fuels.” Both<br />

programs contribute to efforts by all the colleges to reduce the disposal of waste and the consumption of<br />

petroleum fuel.<br />

Like corporations, colleges are becoming more concerned with developing sustainable transportation initiatives.<br />

While not all of the colleges have extensive sustainable transportation programs in place, progress will<br />

undoubtedly be made in the future. Transportation projects implemented at colleges such as Smith, Macalester,<br />

and Dickinson provide exceptional models for other Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s. Their leadership and innovation will<br />

encourage other colleges to follow their example and promote sustainable transportation on college campuses.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

10<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Community Development<br />

By: Bianca E. Garcia<br />

Involvement in the community is a key component when it comes to sustainability. For a college to be successful in<br />

its sustainability efforts, it is necessary to involve community support and outreach. Several colleges have<br />

implemented programs that are geared towards their college community as well as their local community. <strong>College</strong>s<br />

have also performed research about their outside community so that they can better understand how to meet the<br />

needs of the community in order to become more sustainable.<br />

DePauw University has a community service program in Greencastle and in the Putnam community. This program<br />

not only addresses the green aspect of sustainability, but also addresses issues of social justice. The DePauw<br />

Community Service (DCS) takes action in schools, shelters, nursing homes, and a variety of other community<br />

agencies. This program provides an understanding of community dynamics which is necessary in understanding<br />

the needs of the community.<br />

DePauw also has another program called the DePauw Environmental Club. This club focuses more on<br />

environmental awareness. The members participate in programs and activities in the DePauw and Greencastle<br />

community and use their efforts to promote awareness through education. Members of this club practice<br />

sustainable living activities such as recycling, composting, Energy Wars, carbon reduction policies, and other<br />

activities that encourage the local community to lower their impact on global warming.<br />

Another college with strong community initiatives is Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong>. It has a Center for the Environment<br />

that is dedicated to connecting “People, Community, and Earth” which assists students in making connections that<br />

assist them in understanding environmental concepts within their community and in their lives. This center also<br />

supports the exploration of social, cultural, historical, political-economic, and scientific dimensions of<br />

environmental concerns and allows students to dig into their community and make direct connections between the<br />

world of academia and real-world issues.<br />

Mount Holyoke also has an Environmental Action Coalition (EAC). Its mission is to educate and engage the college<br />

community in ecological responsibility, which locally as well as globally focused. This group encourages students<br />

to analyze their impact on immediate as well as larger environments. its achieves these goals through a process of<br />

interactive campaigns, collective learning, and community involvement that extends past the college campus.<br />

One of the many programs directed by the EAC is The Farm, on the outskirts of the campus, intended to increase<br />

the purchase of locally grown food. The EAC is also hoping to start a community garden soon, as well as a<br />

greenhouse and education center to be available to students, faculty, staff, and community members.<br />

Mount Holyoke is also participating in a larger program called Focus the Nation. This program for the college as well<br />

as from the outside community, focuses on global warming awareness, discussion, and action. Mount Holyoke is<br />

working closely with its community to create a plan that will ensure the success of this program.<br />

Sustainability is a communal effort. Successful sustainability programs require research on not only a topic, but<br />

also the surrounding environment. Without understanding the needs of a community, it is difficult to provide for it.<br />

Without the support or involvement of the community, it can be difficult to achieve sustainable success.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

11<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

The Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) Overview<br />

the PSI Scoring System<br />

The Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) uses two systematic questionnaires to analyze the quality of the sustainability<br />

reporting—a base questionnaire for reports across sectors and a sector-specific questionnaire for institutions within the<br />

same sector. The selection of questions is based on, and periodically adjusted to, the most frequently-mentioned topics<br />

in over 1,900 corporate sustainability reports analyzed from 2002 through 2009 at the Roberts Environmental Center.<br />

The Roberts Environmental Center<br />

The Roberts Environmental Center is an environmental research institute at Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong> (CMC). Its<br />

mission is to provide students of all the Claremont <strong>College</strong>s with a comprehensive and realistic understanding of today’s<br />

environmental issues and the ways in which they are being and can be resolved--beyond the confines of traditional<br />

academic disciplines and curriculum--and to identify, publicize, and encourage policies and practices that achieve<br />

economic and social goals in the most environmentally benign and protective manner. The Center is partially funded by<br />

an endowment from George R. Roberts (Founding Partner of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts Co. and CMC alumnus), other<br />

grants, and gifts, and is staffed by faculty and students from the Claremont <strong>College</strong>s.<br />

Methodology<br />

Student analysts download relevant English language web pages from the main<br />

<strong>College</strong> web site for analysis. Our scoring excludes data independently stored<br />

outside the main corporate web site or available only in hard copy. When a<br />

<strong>College</strong> subsidiary has its own sustainability reporting, partial credit is given to the<br />

parent company when a direct link is provided in the main corporate web site. We<br />

archive these web pages as PDF files for future reference. Our analysts use a<br />

keyword search function to search reporting of specific topics and, they fill out a<br />

PSI scoring sheet (http://www.roberts.cmc.edu/PSI/scoringsheet.asp), and track<br />

the coverage and depths of different sustainability issues mentioned in all online<br />

materials.<br />

scores and ranks<br />

When they are finished scoring, the analysts enter their scoring results into the PSI database. The PSI database<br />

calculates scores and publishes them on the Center’s web site.<br />

What do the scores mean?<br />

We normalize all the scores to the potential maximum score. Scores of subsets of the overall score are also normalized<br />

to their potential maxima. The letter grades (A+, A, A-, B+, etc.), however, are normalized to the highest scoring company<br />

analyzed in the report. <strong>College</strong>s with scores in the highest 4% get A+ and any in the bottom 4% get F. We assign these by<br />

dividing the maximum PSI score obtained in the sector into 12 equal parts then rounding fractional score up or down.<br />

This means that A+ and F are under-represented compared the other grades. The same technique applies to the<br />

separate categories of environmental and social scores. Thus, we grade on the curve. We assume that the highest score<br />

obtained in the sector and any scores near it represent the state of the art for that sector and deserve an A+.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

12<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

1. intent<br />

The “Intent” topics are each worth 2 points; 1 point for a discussion of intentions, vision, or plans, and a 1 point for<br />

evidence of specific actions taken to implement them.<br />

2. reporting<br />

PSI Scoring in a Nutshell<br />

Our analysis of sustainability reporting has a set of basic topics applied to all organizations as well as a series of sectorspecific<br />

topics. The topics are divided into environmental and social categories—the latter including human rights—and<br />

into three types of information: 1) intent, 2) reporting, and 3) performance.<br />

The “Reporting” topics are each worth 5 points and are either quantitative (for which we expect numerical data) or<br />

qualitative (for which we don’t).<br />

For quantitative topics, 1 point is available for a discussion, 1 point for putting the information into perspective (i.e.<br />

awards, industry standards, competitor performance, etc., or if the raw data are normalized by dividing by revenue,<br />

number of employees, number of widgets produced, etc.), 1 point for the presence of an explicit numerical goal, 1 point<br />

for numerical data from a single year, and 1 point for similar data from a previous year.<br />

For qualitative topics, there are 3 criteria summed to 5 points: 1.67 points for discussion, 1.67 points for initiatives or<br />

actions, and 1.67 points for perspective.<br />

3. Performance<br />

For each “Reporting” topic, 1 or 2 performance points are available.<br />

For quantitative topics, we give 1 point for improvement from the previous reporting period, and 1 point for better<br />

performance that the sector average (based on the data used for this sector report normalized by revenue).<br />

For qualitative topics we give 1 point for any indication of improvement from previous reporting periods, and 1 point for<br />

perspective.<br />

The 11 “human rights” topics are scored differently, with 5 “reporting” points; 2.5 points for formally adopting a policy or<br />

standard, and 2.5 points for a description of monitoring measures. In addition, there are 2 “performance” points; 1 point<br />

for evidence of actions to reinforce policy and 1 point for a quantitative indication of compliance.<br />

Distribution of Scores by topics<br />

Social,<br />

Qualitative<br />

Data<br />

30%<br />

Social,<br />

Quantitative<br />

Data<br />

7%<br />

Social, Human<br />

Rights Data<br />

14%<br />

Environmental,<br />

Qualitative<br />

Data<br />

29%<br />

Environmental,<br />

Quantitative<br />

Data<br />

20%<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

13<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

Social Intent Topics<br />

Percent of total possible score for all colleges combined.<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

*<br />

51<br />

54<br />

*<br />

17<br />

18<br />

52<br />

53<br />

82<br />

*<br />

45<br />

47<br />

49<br />

*<br />

80<br />

Accountability<br />

Health and Safety, or Social organizational structure<br />

Third party validation<br />

Management<br />

Workforce profile: Ethnicities/Race<br />

Workforce profile: Gender<br />

Workforce profile: Age<br />

Emergency preparedness program<br />

Employee training for career development<br />

Policy<br />

Social policy statement<br />

Code of conduct or business ethics<br />

Supplier screening based on social or<br />

environmental performance/ Supplier management.<br />

Social Demographic<br />

Employment for individuals with disabilities<br />

0<br />

Accountability<br />

Management<br />

Policy<br />

Social Demographic<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report<br />

Card Criteria<br />

Vision<br />

*<br />

288<br />

292<br />

294<br />

295<br />

296<br />

*<br />

42<br />

43<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card<br />

Criteria<br />

Formal Sustainability Commitments<br />

Student involvement<br />

Endowment Transparency.<br />

Investment Priorities.<br />

Shareholder Engagement.<br />

Vision<br />

Social visionary statement<br />

Social impediments and challenges<br />

Notes:<br />

* These numbers correspond to the numbers in the PSI questionnaire. Items with numbers higher than 99 are sector<br />

specific questions.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

14


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

Environmental Reporting Topics<br />

Percent of total possible score for all colleges combined.<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Emissions to air<br />

Energy<br />

Management<br />

Materials usage<br />

Recycling<br />

Waste<br />

Water<br />

* Emissions to air<br />

111 Greenhouse gases, total<br />

112 Carbon dioxide (CO2) or equivalents (i.e. GHG)<br />

* Energy<br />

26 Energy used/consumption<br />

27 Renewable energy consumption<br />

* Management<br />

38 Environmental notices of violation<br />

39 Environmental expenses and/or investments<br />

40 Environmental fines<br />

163 Transportation Initiatives<br />

164 Comparative Reporting<br />

165 Land Use<br />

2499 Procedures for selecting environmental<br />

performance indicators used by the company<br />

2599 Rationale for environmental initiatives and<br />

mitigations<br />

5499 Rationale for goals and targets<br />

* Materials usage<br />

146 Green Material Used<br />

161 Pesticide Use<br />

162 Fertilizer Use<br />

166 Green Food Purchasing<br />

* Recycling<br />

30 Waste recycled<br />

32 Office recycling rate<br />

* Waste<br />

34 Waste disposed of<br />

35 Hazardous waste produced<br />

37 Hazardous waste released<br />

110 Waste water released<br />

* Water<br />

29 Water used<br />

Notes:<br />

* These numbers correspond to the numbers in the PSI questionnaire. Items with numbers higher than 99 are sector<br />

specific questions.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

15


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

Environmental Intent Topics<br />

Percent of total possible score for all colleges combined.<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

*<br />

4<br />

19<br />

*<br />

297<br />

*<br />

16<br />

20<br />

21<br />

23<br />

*<br />

Accountability<br />

Report contact person<br />

Environmental structure or management<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator<br />

Dormitory/Classroom Waste Recycling<br />

Management<br />

Environmental education<br />

Environmental management system<br />

Environmental accounting<br />

Stakeholder consultation<br />

Policy<br />

40<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Environmental policy statement<br />

Climate change/global warming<br />

30<br />

11<br />

Habitat/ecosystem conservation<br />

20<br />

12<br />

Biodiversity<br />

13<br />

Green Purchasing<br />

10<br />

0<br />

*<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card<br />

Criteria<br />

Accountability<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator<br />

Management<br />

Policy<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report<br />

Card Criteria<br />

Vision<br />

289<br />

290<br />

291<br />

293<br />

*<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Climate Change & Energy.<br />

Food & Recycling.<br />

Green Building.<br />

Transportation<br />

Vision<br />

Environmental visionary statement<br />

Environmental impediments and challenges<br />

Notes:<br />

* These numbers correspond to the numbers in the PSI questionnaire. Items with numbers higher than 99 are sector<br />

specific questions.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

16


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

Social Reporting Topics<br />

Percent of total possible score for all colleges combined.<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Human Rights<br />

Management<br />

Qualitative Social<br />

Quantitative Social<br />

*<br />

1<br />

7<br />

8<br />

58<br />

59<br />

60<br />

61<br />

62<br />

63<br />

64<br />

65<br />

*<br />

2<br />

*<br />

66<br />

67<br />

68<br />

70<br />

72<br />

*<br />

3<br />

74<br />

75<br />

76<br />

77<br />

81<br />

Human Rights<br />

Sexual harassment<br />

Political Contributions<br />

Bribery<br />

Anti-Corruption practices<br />

Corporal punishment of employees<br />

Equal opportunity, elimination of discrimination,<br />

promotion of diversity, or non-discrimination policy<br />

Free association and collective bargaining of<br />

employees<br />

Fair compensation of employees<br />

Forced labor of employees<br />

Working hours<br />

Use of illegal child labor<br />

Management<br />

Women in Management<br />

Qualitative Social<br />

Community Development<br />

Employee Satisfaction Survey<br />

Community Education<br />

Occupational health and safety protection<br />

Employee volunteerism<br />

Quantitative Social<br />

Turnover Rate<br />

Recordable incident rate/ Accident indices<br />

Lost workday case rate<br />

Health and safety citations<br />

Health and safety fines<br />

Social community investment<br />

Notes:<br />

* These numbers correspond to the numbers in the PSI questionnaire. Items with numbers higher than 99 are sector<br />

specific questions.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

17


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

Environmental Intent Element of the PSI Scores<br />

Transportation<br />

Green purchasing<br />

Environmental education<br />

.Food & Recycling<br />

Environmental visionary<br />

statement<br />

.Climate Change & Energy<br />

Environmental policy<br />

statement<br />

.Green Building<br />

Climate change/global<br />

warming<br />

Report contact person<br />

Environmental structure or<br />

management<br />

Habitat/ecosystem<br />

conservation<br />

Environmental impediments<br />

and challenges<br />

Dormitory/Classroom Waste<br />

Recycling<br />

Biodiversity<br />

Stakeholder consultation<br />

Environmental accounting<br />

Environmental management<br />

system<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />

= Percentage of colleges addressing the topics<br />

= Percentage of the total possible number of points awarded to all colleges combined for each topic,<br />

indicating the depth of reporting coverage measured by PSI criteria for each topic.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

18


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

Environmental Reporting Element of the PSI Scores<br />

Greenhouse gases, total<br />

Green Food Purchasing<br />

Waste recycled<br />

Transportation Initiatives<br />

Energy used/consumption<br />

Renewable energy consumption<br />

Office recycling rate<br />

Water used<br />

Carbon dioxide (CO2) or equivalents (i.e. GHG)<br />

Waste disposed of<br />

Green Material Used<br />

Land Use<br />

Rationale for goals and targets<br />

Rationale for environmental initiatives and mitigations<br />

Pesticide Use<br />

Hazardous waste produced<br />

Fertilizer Use<br />

Waste water released<br />

Comparative Reporting<br />

Environmental expenses and/or investments<br />

Procedures for selecting environmental performance indicators<br />

used by the company<br />

Hazardous waste released<br />

Environmental notices of violation<br />

Environmental fines<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

= Percentage of colleges addressing the topics<br />

= Percentage of the total possible number of points awarded to all colleges combined for each topic,<br />

indicating the depth of reporting coverage measured by PSI criteria for each topic.<br />

19<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

Social Intent Element of the PSI Scores<br />

Student involvement<br />

Employment for individuals with disabilities<br />

Social visionary statement<br />

Emergency preparedness program<br />

Health and Safety, or Social organizational structure<br />

Formal Sustainability Commitments<br />

Code of conduct or business ethics<br />

Employee training for career development<br />

Investment Priorities.<br />

Social policy statement<br />

Endowment Transparency.<br />

Workforce profile: Gender<br />

Workforce profile: Ethnicities/Race<br />

Supplier screening based on social or environmental<br />

performance/ Supplier management.<br />

Third party validation<br />

Shareholder Engagement.<br />

Social impediments and challenges<br />

Workforce profile: Age<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />

= Percentage of colleges addressing the topics<br />

= Percentage of the total possible number of points awarded to all colleges combined for each topic, indicating<br />

the depth of reporting coverage measured by PSI criteria for each topic.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

20


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

Social Reporting Element of the PSI Scores<br />

Community Development<br />

Community Education<br />

Employee volunteerism<br />

Sexual harassment<br />

Occupational health and safety protection<br />

Equal opportunity, elimination of discrimination, promotion of<br />

diversity, or non-discrimination policy<br />

Social community investment<br />

Fair compensation of employees<br />

Women in Management<br />

Anti-Corruption practices<br />

Working hours<br />

Employee Satisfaction Survey<br />

Health and safety citations<br />

Health and safety fines<br />

Political Contributions<br />

Recordable incident rate/ Accident indices<br />

Corporal punishment of employees<br />

Lost workday case rate<br />

Forced labor of employees<br />

Turnover Rate<br />

Bribery<br />

Free association and collective bargaining of employees<br />

Use of illegal child labor<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%<br />

= Percentage of colleges addressing the topics<br />

= Percentage of the total possible number of points awarded to all colleges combined for each topic,<br />

indicating the depth of reporting coverage measured by PSI criteria for each topic.<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

21


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Environmental Intent Scores<br />

EI Scores Rankings<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

W esleyan University<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Colgate University<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

W ashington and Lee University<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

Environmental intent scores include topics about the firm’s<br />

products, environmental organization, vision and commitment,<br />

stakeholders, environmental policy and certifications, environmental<br />

aspects and impacts, choice of environmental performance<br />

indicators and those used by the industry, environmental initiatives<br />

and mitigations, and environmental goals and targets.<br />

A+<br />

A+<br />

A+<br />

A+<br />

A<br />

A<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

D+<br />

D<br />

D-<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Wesleyan University<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Colgate University<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Washington and Lee University<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

22


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Environmental Reporting Scores<br />

ER Scores Rankings<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Colgate University<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

W ashington and Lee University<br />

Furman University<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

W esleyan University<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

Environmental reporting scores are based on the degree to which<br />

the company discusses its emissions, energy sources and<br />

consumption, environmental incidents and violations, materials use,<br />

mitigations and remediation, waste produced, and water used. They<br />

also include use of life cycle analysis, environmental performance<br />

and stewardship of products, and environmental performance of<br />

suppliers and contractors.<br />

A+<br />

A<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

B<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Colgate University<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Washington and Lee University<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

23


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Environmental Performance Scores<br />

EP Scores Rankings<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Richmond University<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

W esleyan University<br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Washington and Lee<br />

Colgate University<br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

Environmental performance scores are based on whether or not the<br />

firm has improved its performance on each of the topics discussed<br />

under the heading of environmental reporting, and on whether the<br />

quality of the performance is better than that of the firm’s peers.<br />

Scoring for each topic is one point if performance is better than in<br />

previous reports, two points if better than industry peers, three<br />

points if both.<br />

A+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Washington and Lee University<br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Colgate University<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

24


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Social Intent Scores<br />

SI Scores Rankings<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

W esleyan University<br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

W ashington and Lee University<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Colgate University<br />

Furman University<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

Social intent scores include topics about the firm’s financials,<br />

employees, safety reporting, social management organization, social<br />

vision and commitment, stakeholders, social policy and<br />

certifications, social aspects and impacts, choice of social<br />

performance indicators and those used by the industry, social<br />

initiatives and mitigations, and social goals and targets.<br />

A-<br />

B+<br />

A<br />

B<br />

A-<br />

A<br />

A-<br />

A<br />

C+<br />

A-<br />

B<br />

C+<br />

B<br />

A-<br />

A-<br />

B-<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B+<br />

C+<br />

B-<br />

C+<br />

B<br />

B-<br />

B<br />

B-<br />

C+<br />

A-<br />

B<br />

B+<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

C<br />

C+<br />

A-<br />

C-<br />

C<br />

C+<br />

C-<br />

C<br />

C<br />

D+<br />

D<br />

D+<br />

C-<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D<br />

D+<br />

F<br />

F<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Washington and Lee University<br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Colgate University<br />

Furman University<br />

Bucknell University<br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

25


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Social Reporting Scores<br />

SR Rankings<br />

Bucknell University<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

W esleyan University<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

W ashington and Lee University<br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Colgate University<br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Richmond University<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

Social reporting scores are based on the degree to which the<br />

company discusses various aspects of its dealings with its<br />

employees and contractors. They also include social costs and<br />

investments.<br />

A+<br />

A-<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B+<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B-<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

F<br />

F<br />

Bucknell University<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Washington and Lee University<br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Colgate University<br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Richmond University<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

26


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Social Performance Scores<br />

SP Rankings<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Colgate University<br />

W ashington and Lee University<br />

W esleyan University<br />

Furman University<br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Richmond University<br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

0 25 50 75 100<br />

Social performance scores are based on improvement,<br />

performance better than the sector average, or statements of<br />

compliance with established social standards.<br />

A+<br />

B-<br />

B-<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C+<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

C-<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D+<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

D-<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Colgate University<br />

Furman University<br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Washington and Lee University<br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

27


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Visual Cluster Analysis<br />

Visual cluster analysis multivariate data of the sort produced by the PSI are difficult to summarize. Here we have created radar diagrams<br />

of the performance of each college analysed in the sector by its environmental and social intent, reporting, and performance sorted by<br />

company ranking. Maximum scores will match the outer sides of the hexagon which total up to 100 percent.<br />

EI = Environmental Intent, ER = Environmental Reporting, EP = Environmental Performance<br />

SI = Social Intent, SR = Social Reporting, SP = Social Performance<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke<br />

<strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

DePauw University<br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and<br />

Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

28<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy<br />

Cross<br />

Colgate University<br />

Washington and Lee<br />

University<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

ER<br />

100<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--<br />

University of the<br />

South<br />

United States<br />

Military Academy<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

EP<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

25<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

SR<br />

Harvey Mudd<br />

<strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Naval<br />

Academy<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

ER<br />

100<br />

EI<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

EP<br />

SI<br />

SP<br />

SR<br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

29<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Number of Explicit numerical goals Reported<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military<br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of<br />

Bucknell University<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

DePauw University<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5 6<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Explicit Goals Most Frequently Reported<br />

1 Renewable energy consumption<br />

14<br />

2 Energy used/consumption<br />

12<br />

3 Carbon dioxide (CO2) or<br />

7<br />

equivalents (i.e. GHG)<br />

4 Water used<br />

7<br />

5 Waste recycled<br />

6<br />

6 Waste disposed of<br />

4<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

30


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Number of Topics Showing Performance Improvement over Previous Year Data<br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Bucknell University<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Richmond University<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

United States Military Academy<br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Furman University<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

5<br />

5<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Topics Most Frequently Reported as Having Improvements over previous year data<br />

1 Energy used/consumption<br />

9<br />

2 Water used<br />

7<br />

3 Waste recycled<br />

6<br />

4 Renewable energy consumption<br />

5<br />

5 Transportation Initiatives<br />

5<br />

6 Community Development<br />

4<br />

7 Carbon dioxide (CO2) or<br />

4<br />

equivalents (i.e. GHG)<br />

8 Office recycling rate<br />

4<br />

9 Green Food Purchasing<br />

3<br />

10 Waste disposed of<br />

2<br />

11 Employee volunteerism<br />

2<br />

12 Rationale for environmental<br />

2<br />

initiatives and mitigations<br />

13 Hazardous waste produced<br />

1<br />

14 Rationale for goals and targets<br />

1<br />

15 Waste water released<br />

1<br />

16 Comparative Reporting<br />

1<br />

17 Women in Management<br />

1<br />

18 Social community investment<br />

1<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s<br />

31


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B+<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong>, like many colleges across the nation has committed to sustainable practices and education. It has pledged to conserve and to<br />

support the sustainable use of natural resources through policies, programs, and practices. In comparison to other colleges, <strong>Amherst</strong> stands as a<br />

beacon for sustainable goals. <strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong> is very environmentally and socially aware, and it works to bring sustainability issues to the forefront<br />

of discussion. Along with major changes in structure, such as an increase in green building, <strong>Amherst</strong> has made sustainability an everyday practice.<br />

With an increase in transportation sharing programs such as Zipcar, and even smaller implementations such as placing eco-friendly napkin<br />

dispensers in the dining halls to reduce the amount of wasted napkins, sustainability has become a way of life for many <strong>Amherst</strong> students and<br />

faculty. The <strong>College</strong> also has the ability to get campus involvement in more abstract forms of sustainability such as getting more than 1,700 students<br />

and faculty to pledge to place their computers on sleep mode when idle. With a decrease in waste, an increase in recycling, the use of clean<br />

renewable energy, local organic food production, mixed with campus awareness and participation <strong>Amherst</strong> should reach all goals relatively soon.<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

78%<br />

S<br />

22%<br />

78<br />

52<br />

31<br />

14<br />

12 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 8 14 57 Good<br />

Management 30 63 48 Needs improvement<br />

Materials usage 6 21 29 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 6 28 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 1 6 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 10 60 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 4 42 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

32<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

In 2008, <strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong> collaborated with Jerusalem’s Al-Quds University to form the first dual-degree collaboration between a Palestinian University<br />

and an American institution of higher education. Al-Quds <strong>Bard</strong> is set to open in phases in 2009-2010 and center on the Honors <strong>College</strong> for Liberal<br />

Arts and Sciences, the Master of Arts in Teaching (MAT) Program, and the Model School. To help reduce building costs <strong>Bard</strong> is evaluating using the<br />

United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) process for campus construction. NYSERDA has<br />

awarded the college $200,000 to install a solar thermal heating system at the Stevenson Gymnasium. The project is expected to reduce fuel oil use<br />

by 25%. <strong>Bard</strong> is an Energy Star campus. In <strong>Bard</strong>’s employee handbook in the Environmental Policy section, staff is encouraged to sort and collect<br />

bottles and cans, cardboard, and paper products. <strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong> President Leon Botstein received the 2009 Carnegie Corporation Academic<br />

Leadership Award of $500,000 for effecting positive change, not only for students, but also for the local community and the world at large.<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

56<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

54%<br />

S<br />

46%<br />

33<br />

33<br />

26<br />

17<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 6 83 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Management 15 63 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 3 28 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 26 77 34 Needs improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 13 35 37 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 2 42 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

33<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

In its mission statement, <strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong> has a specific goal of how much it would like to reduce emissions and states it is fully committed to<br />

environmental sustainability. In 2007, two students and a faculty member constructed a <strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report. This report gives a<br />

brief overview of where <strong>Barnard</strong> stands in relation to certain environmental issues and describes how the students, faculty, and administration play<br />

a role in sustainability at <strong>Barnard</strong>. This was something nearly unique; the only other school that had its own sustainability report in 2007 (as far as<br />

we are aware) is Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong>. <strong>Barnard</strong>’s sustainability website also has a Technical Energy and Water Savings audit which<br />

documents goals, analyzes energy use, and develops short term and long term plans for <strong>Barnard</strong>. This was a useful resource for grasping numerical<br />

initiatives and improvements for the institution. Overall, although <strong>Barnard</strong> mentions much of what is used on the PSI scoring sheets, I would not<br />

necessarily say that it is doing an exceptional job in maintaining a sustainable campus. The <strong>College</strong> could do a better job listing specific goals and<br />

numbers about consumption on campus in order to paint a more vivid picture of actual improvements or work being done, if any.<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

63%<br />

S<br />

37%<br />

71<br />

72<br />

31<br />

9<br />

9 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 18 63 29 Needs improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 6 28 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

34<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong> had a clear visionary statement that included how it was acting on environmental challenges, and there was information about its<br />

environmental administration and management system. <strong>Bates</strong> has LEED certified buildings and active recycling, and green food practices and<br />

purchasing were well reported along with transportation initiatives and detailed student involvement. <strong>Bates</strong> has also been involved in social and<br />

environmental community development. There was some discussion of rationale and procedures for choosing environmental initiatives and targets,<br />

and the historical progression of <strong>Bates</strong>’ environmental policy and initiatives was an interesting and useful resource. But there was no mention of<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> position on habitat conservation or biodiversity, no information on age gender or race/ethnicity, supplier screening, employment of individuals<br />

with disabilities or on employee training, and no information on environmental accounting (expenses and fines). Investment priorities were not<br />

reported either, but <strong>Bates</strong> reported to greenreportcard.org that its holdings were available to certain administrators; if this information were made<br />

public it would improve <strong>Bates</strong>’ PSI score. There were no data on hazardous waste produced or released either, but there was discussion of several<br />

key environmental factors such as total greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy used, waste disposed of, and water recycled. There were no<br />

recordable incidents or accident incidences reported. Pesticide and fertilizer use were not reported and land use was only briefly discussed. Health<br />

and safety precautions or citations were not well reported, nor was human rights compliance.<br />

Marissa L. Garvin<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

75%<br />

S<br />

25%<br />

79<br />

30<br />

33<br />

4<br />

8 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 7 8 88 Excellent<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 8 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 7 14 50 Good<br />

Management 14 63 22 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 8 35 23 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

35<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

“Sustainability is more than an intellectual concept at Bowdoin.” Bowdoin <strong>College</strong> has definitely committed itself to making sure sustainability<br />

reaches every point of learning and practice at the institution. Along with the Environmental Studies major, students can “pair up” this major with<br />

another, such as Geology, Physics or even English. Such unique coordination offers students a holistic view of sustainability and the world. Students<br />

also participate in EcoReps, an organization that helps foster communication between students and administration to improve student life and its<br />

commitment to environmental issues. Bowdoin also has participated for a third year in a row in Recycle Mania, a nationwide recycling competition,<br />

thus showing how sustainability is a concern that reaches outside of the campus. Transportation is another aspect Bowdoin tries to incorporate into<br />

its sustainability vision. It has created several ways for students and employees to carpool or look for other ways of traveling off campus. Some of<br />

these methods include the Bowdoin Yellow Bike Club which provides bicycles across campus, the Bowdoin <strong>College</strong> Ride Share Board, an online<br />

forum which helps students communicate with one another to get transportation, the Bowdoin Shuttle Service which provides students with<br />

transportation on campus while classes are in session, and lastly, a ZipCar fleet which allows students and employees to rent cars by the hour.<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

69%<br />

S<br />

31%<br />

82<br />

56<br />

22<br />

11<br />

5 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 8 14 57 Good<br />

Management 4 63 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 9 14 64 Good<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 3 35 9 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

36<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong> is strongly dedicated to energy conservation. It has had several workshops dedicated to renewable energy (specifically<br />

windmills) and continue to increase its green purchasing by using LED lights in signs. A campus group called “The Greens” has been initiated to get<br />

students educated and involved with sustainability initiatives and get the support from administrators as well. Bryn Mawr claims to have the lowest<br />

energy consumption of any of its peers and has started an Energy Diet that reduces dorm energy consumption by 12%. For the dining halls, the<br />

college purchases some organic food, and recycles waste oil by using it as biodiesel, and there is a recycling program on campus. There is no<br />

information about campus greenhouse gas emissions however. The social policy statement is limited; most of the information is in the Honor Code.<br />

Bryn Mawr does report that 49% of its faculty is female and that there is an effort to increase the attendance of women. There is no information<br />

about safety incident rates or health and safety fines, but there is an Environmental Health and Safety office, which manages occupational health<br />

and safety protection. Through its student-run organizations, Bryn Mawr demonstrates efforts in community development, education, and<br />

volunteerism. Overall Bryn Mawr offers a large amount of information about energy, green buildings and green transportation. It needs to develop<br />

more environmental initiatives and select performance indicators to get feedback. It would be useful to widen its environmental awareness;<br />

although it appears to be doing an admirable job in conserving energy, other areas of the environment including biodiversity, habitat conservation,<br />

and global warming are unaddressed.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

43%<br />

S<br />

57%<br />

44<br />

50<br />

8<br />

12<br />

0<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 8 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 6 83 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 63 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

37<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

A-<br />

Bucknell University<br />

Bucknell University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Bucknell University has an extremely detailed Comprehensive Environmental Assessment on its website, one of the most thorough we have seen,<br />

providing an exemplary model for those conducting similar analyses. It explicitly avoids most social aspects of sustainability reporting, hence its<br />

score on the PSI is not has high as might be expected for such a massive effort, but we imagine that a social analysis can't be far behind. A<br />

particularly interesting feature is its formal discussion of letter grades Bucknell received on the Sustainable Endowments Institute's "2008 <strong>College</strong><br />

Sustainability Report Card" and responses which produced better results in 2009. A few of the topics covered in the analysis are listed below: The<br />

fuel efficiency is recorded for all Bucknell University vehicles. The frequency of North American native trees on campus is recorded. Pesticides and<br />

fertilizers used are listed. The Campus Greening Council is made up of students, faculty, and staff, who make environmental policy<br />

recommendations to the administration. The Environmental Management Assistance Program serves to reduce raw material purchase costs,<br />

reduce compliance burdens and costs associated with environmental permits, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, reduce waste<br />

management, treatment and disposal costs, and reduce long-term liabilities associated with hazardous waste management. In 1998 Bucknell’s<br />

power plant was converted from a conventional coal-burning facility to a co-generation power plan fueled by natural gas. This conversion has led to<br />

a 40% reduction in the University’s greenhouse gas emissions. Beginning in 2000 Bucknell began purchasing wind power to supplement its on-site<br />

power generation. As of January 2008, wind power represented 100% of Bucknell’s purchased energy, for a total of approximately 4 million kilowatt<br />

hours per year. Bucknell students can report incidents of abuse by the Lewisburg Police, Penn. State Police, E. Buffalo Police, or Public Safety to<br />

the Bucknell Student Government. Since Spring of 2008 the Dining program has distributed "E-comment" cards. The responses are displayed via a<br />

digital picture frame outside the Bostwick marketplace. Coffee is purchased from a particular plantation community in Nicaragua. This is done in<br />

compliance with "Free Trade Coffee."<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

70%<br />

S<br />

30%<br />

76<br />

52<br />

39<br />

14<br />

20<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Bucknell University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 5 14 36 Needs improvement<br />

Management 21 63 33 Needs improvement<br />

Materials usage 11 21 52 Good<br />

Recycling 9 14 64 Good<br />

Waste 10 28 36 Needs improvement<br />

Water 5 7 71 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 7 10 70 Good<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 5 77 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

38<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 14 35 40 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 4 42 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

39<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

“Assessing Carleton’s Sustainability: A Campus Environmental Audit” was conducted as a student project with help from Good Company and its<br />

“Sustainable Pathways Toolkit.” The report is structured as a collection of indicators and associated goals, benchmarks and recommendations. The<br />

report does an excellent job at noting areas in which institutional policy could be introduced to improve environmental sustainability. Nevertheless,<br />

without direct institutional support, the report is incapable of demonstrating institutional intent or discussing management systems. Also, the report<br />

fails to touch on social sustainability, greatly reducing its total PSI score.<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

74%<br />

S<br />

26%<br />

91<br />

31<br />

22<br />

7<br />

9<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 5 8 63 Good<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 11 63 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 2 21 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 5 28 18 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 7 10 70 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

40<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D+<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong> has signed the President's Climate Commitment, and has assigned committees to work out the details, but the material online is very<br />

limited, with almost no quantitative goals and very little other quantitative information. Mostly it seems to be whatever seemed interesting to the<br />

public relations staff, but with no systematic treatment of the issues.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

66%<br />

S<br />

34%<br />

41<br />

22<br />

6<br />

0<br />

3 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 0 21 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 3 28 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 3 35 9 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

41<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong> has done a truly outstanding job of addressing the need for education about the environmental challenges of today. The <strong>College</strong><br />

started its environmental studies program in the 1970’s and has been alerting students to sustainability problems ever since. This is reflected in the<br />

number of different green programs Colby students are involved in, from lobbying Capitol Hill about climate change to giving out florescent light<br />

bulbs to save energy, Colby students are trying to bring about change on their campus, in their state, and in their country. The administration at<br />

Colby deserves praise for more than just fostering and supporting the initiatives and actions of its students. In 2003 Colby made the historic shift to<br />

100% renewable power, a costly initiative that demonstrated the <strong>College</strong>’s commitment to the environment. The <strong>College</strong> considers both its<br />

environmental impact and its endowment when making purchasing decisions and has found ways to take care of both, building LEED certified<br />

buildings that use less power and purchasing washers that use less water and detergent. It is clear that Colby has a large number of sustainability<br />

initiatives in place, however in some cases the <strong>College</strong> hasn’t posted the numerical results of these initiatives which have made it hard to judge the<br />

effect of many of them.<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

80%<br />

S<br />

20%<br />

50<br />

21<br />

28<br />

7<br />

0 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 5 7 71 Good<br />

Energy 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Management 5 63 8 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 7 21 33 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 1 6 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 1 77 1 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

42<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Colgate University<br />

Colgate University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Sustainability at Colgate begins with a strong environmental visionary statement, and is followed by extensive policies and initiatives that will help<br />

the <strong>College</strong> realize its vision. Along with discussing several of the most pertinent environmental and social issues, Colgate also reports its energy<br />

consumption and the amount of waste disposed of. While much of Colgate’s web site details school-wide programs and quantitative information,<br />

Colgate also highlights the importance of student environmental education. For example, Colgate’s Guide to Green Living provides students with tips<br />

to reduce their energy and water consumption. Colgate also provides students with opportunities to get involved in the <strong>College</strong>’s sustainability<br />

mission. Colgate University provides an adequate example of basic sustainability reporting for a college, but there is clearly room for improvement.<br />

The University needs to begin covering more topics and reporting more quantitative data.<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

55%<br />

S<br />

45%<br />

50<br />

44<br />

18<br />

12<br />

2<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Colgate University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 6 67 Good<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 3 63 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 6 21 29 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 5 28 18 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 7 10 70 Good<br />

Policy 1 6 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 5 77 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

43<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross 2009 Web Pages<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross, like many other colleges committed to sustainability, has joined the American <strong>College</strong> & University Presidents Climate<br />

Commitment. It has set a short term goal of reducing “carbon emissions by 2015, and a long term goal of carbon neutrality by 2040.” Theses<br />

quantitative goals are supplemented with everyday practices at Holy Cross. With new construction occurring around campus, Holy Cross seeks to<br />

have LEED silver certification for every new building constructed. The latest, The Integrated Science Complex, “will have constant volume low flow<br />

hoods utilizing 30% less exhaust air than standard hoods.” Numbers and goals like these make sustainability an exciting new concept for everyone.<br />

Students are also making sustainability a tangible practice on campus. A community garden has been created to grow vegetables and fruits so that<br />

more organic produce will be available for the Holy Cross community. Students also participate in projects and internships at non-profit<br />

organizations within the Worchester area. The Environmental Studies program provides students with information and resources where “all things<br />

sustainable” can be known of and implemented. The student environmental group, Eco-Action, focuses on issues such as global warming on a<br />

national scale to issues of local land preservation.<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

65%<br />

S<br />

35%<br />

50<br />

33<br />

25<br />

10<br />

2<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy<br />

Cross<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 1 2 50 Good<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 6 67 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 5 7 71 Good<br />

Energy 7 14 50 Good<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 10 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 7 10 70 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

44<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B+<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong> has proven itself to be a leader in sustainability practices. The Campus Sustainability Council, Office of Sustainability, and<br />

numerous student groups have worked to promote on-campus sustainability and the initiatives of the Presidents’ Climate Commitment, of which<br />

President Richard Celeste is a signatory. In June 2008, the college released its Environmental Inventory and Sustainability Management Plan with<br />

the help of an engineering consulting group. This document, available on the college website, gives recommendations for improving energy<br />

efficiency, cutting down on greenhouse gas emissions, reducing water usage, improving transportation, etc. •Colorado <strong>College</strong> has already<br />

supported numerous such projects. A solar electric system with a capacity of 25-kW was installed on top of the Edith Gaylord Apartments. Both the<br />

science and arts centers have earned LEED certifications, and the administration pledges to reach LEED certification for all new buildings. Bon<br />

Appetit has been providing food services since 2008 and has stressed the importance of local and organic food, even buying fruits and vegetables<br />

from the student-run, sustainable Colorado <strong>College</strong> Garden. Furthermore, the college aims to set up a sustainable investment fund which will<br />

generate income through investments that are both environmentally and socially responsible.<br />

Joseph Bryan Swartley<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

58%<br />

S<br />

42%<br />

79<br />

75<br />

36<br />

18<br />

0<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 5 14 36 Needs improvement<br />

Management 12 63 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 12 77 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

45<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong> employs a full-time environmental coordinator and makes contact readily available. The college also has many goals regarding<br />

the practice and policy of sustainability and has come a long way from past years towards implementing them. There is a problem, however, in the<br />

amount of performance reported. With all of the great things taking place on Connecticut’s campus, such as the reduction of 20% of greenhouse gas<br />

emissions since 2004 and the large amount of renewable energy purchased, the information available on many of the topics considered in the PSI is<br />

subpar. Connecticut <strong>College</strong>, however, appears to be aware of this shortcoming and I believe that with the help of the environmental coordinator,<br />

the college will not only increase its sustainability practices but also more thoroughly and readily report it.<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

Rishabh Rajen Parekh<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

75%<br />

S<br />

25%<br />

76<br />

21<br />

19<br />

0<br />

9 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 12 63 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 4 35 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

46<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Although Davidson <strong>College</strong> published a 2009 Sustainability Report, the college’s reporting still lags behind the reporting of some of its peer<br />

institutions. A progressive Climate Action Plan is in place to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but current quantitative data regarding emissions<br />

and energy use are not reported. Davidson touches on several of the most important social and environmental issues and has a few initiatives that<br />

promote both student and administrative involvement. These initiatives and goals have resulted in improvements in areas such as bottled water and<br />

energy usage and recycling; however, in general Davidson <strong>College</strong>’s reporting shows considerable room for improvement.<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

55%<br />

S<br />

45%<br />

62<br />

44<br />

15<br />

15<br />

2<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 7 63 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 15 35 43 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 2 42 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

47<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

DePauw University<br />

DePauw University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Many of the categories in the PSI were answered by the President’s Statement and DePauw’s mission statement on page 19. One thing that I<br />

noticed about the mission statement as is often the case, was very general and without any specific proposed actions. I enjoyed the video about the<br />

new compost stations. It is a great way to bring awareness to the situation and the initiatives taken. I also enjoyed reading about the Carbon<br />

Footprint Project, but I would like to see current examples of what they have already done with this project and their results as of now. There is a<br />

“Get Involved” events calendar, but there were no future events listed, although there had been some good programs that involved the outside<br />

community. The DePauw Community Service volunteers in the community of Greencastle and I would like to see distinct examples of some of the<br />

projects DCS has done in the community and on campus, but I could not find any on the web site. Many of the projects and programs are student run<br />

and even though the majority of the people at the university are students, I would like to see exactly how the university gets their faculty and staff<br />

involved directly.<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

50%<br />

S<br />

50%<br />

68<br />

64<br />

20<br />

16 15<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

DePauw University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 6 21 29 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 21 35 60 Good<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

48<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong> is a leader in campus sustainability. Dr. William G. Durden, the president of Dickinson, signed the Presidents Climate Commitment<br />

in 2007 that has since become a core component of the <strong>College</strong>’s sustainability program. The <strong>College</strong> runs both an Office of Sustainability with hired<br />

sustainability coordinators and a Center for Environmental and Sustainability Education where a full time director was hired in 2008. Dickinson<br />

<strong>College</strong> has been recognized numerous times for its innovative execution of sustainable food service initiatives. The <strong>College</strong> dining services<br />

purchase from seven local farms and producers, including a local dairy farm. In addition, the Dickinson <strong>College</strong> Organic Farm has been developed to<br />

provide produce to the college’s dining services. By purchasing vegetables from the college farm at market price, dining services is saving food and<br />

transportation cost while also reinvesting more than $6,500 into the <strong>College</strong> farm in the last fiscal year. Investment priorities and shareholder<br />

engagement are two more exceptional areas of strength of the <strong>College</strong>, areas that the majority of other colleges struggle with. The <strong>College</strong> currently<br />

invests in socially screened funds, green funds, and community development funds. Additionally, a unique Socially Responsible Investment<br />

Discussion Group was formed in 2007 consisting of four students, four faculty members, one alumnus, and two administrators, all of whom study<br />

socially responsible and sustainable investment.<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

51%<br />

S<br />

49%<br />

71<br />

50<br />

15<br />

20<br />

5<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 6 21 29 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

49<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Franklin and Marshall’s environmental consciousness is definitely student focused; including, for example competitions such as Recyclemania,<br />

which resulted in approximately 30% of campus waste being recycled. The Environmental Action Alliance promotes environmentally responsible<br />

behavior on campus as well as running green programs throughout the campus. A way to bridge the gap between students and the administration<br />

at Franklin and Marshall is with the Campus Sustainability Committee, the committee is comprised of students, faculty and staff who advise the<br />

college president on environmental issues on campus and in the community. The committee’s most visible work is during Sustainability Week;<br />

through a series of events and campaigns the Week challenges the Franklin and Marshall community to be greener.<br />

Some other interesting initiatives the campus has implemented are through food services. The dining hall operates with a tray-less policy as well as<br />

the recycling of the fryer oil in the kitchen. The school also participates in green community outreach with student involvement and school support<br />

of the Eastern Market program -- managed by a Franklin and Marshall alumni -- which creates a local food network that provides healthy and fresh<br />

local food to the urban neighborhoods.<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

49%<br />

S<br />

51%<br />

59<br />

50<br />

17<br />

17<br />

9<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Franklin and<br />

Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 7 10 70 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 6 63 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 16 77 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 8 35 23 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

50<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Furman University<br />

Furman University 2009 Web Pages<br />

With the opening of the David E. Shi Center for Sustainability in July 2008, Furman University showcased its commitment to sustainability through a<br />

new focus on outreach programs, curricular development, and original research. Though the Shi Center is new, Furman’s engagement in<br />

sustainability is not. The board of trustees at Furman committed to promote sustainability over a decade ago and, in 2002, the Board voted to require<br />

all new buildings and renovations to meet a minimum of LEED silver certification. Six buildings are currently registered for LEED certification,<br />

including Cliffs Cottage, the carbon-neutral home of Furman's sustainability center that seeks a LEED Platinum rating. Students have worked hard in<br />

developing a new organic garden that will provide produce for the dining halls as well as receive compost from recyclable waste and food scraps<br />

from dining services. The college also purchases from 20 local farms and offers fair trade coffee and a variety of organic items.<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

63%<br />

S<br />

37%<br />

79<br />

42<br />

24<br />

14<br />

2<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Furman University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 8 63 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 5 77 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

51<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B+<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong>'s environmental strength lies in its student involvement. The <strong>College</strong> employs three students to work in sustainability-related<br />

programs. Student groups included Gettysburg Environmental Concerns Organization and Gettysburg Research and Action by Students for<br />

Sustainability. Student management also includes a campus kitchen recycling project and Painted Turtle Farm. All first year students are introduced<br />

to sustainability initiatives upon arrival in the residence halls, The dining services use local dairy products and most produce comes from local<br />

farmers or from the campus garden. Compost is collected for the campus garden and the college recycles cardboard, plastic, aluminum, and glass,<br />

diverting 24% of waste from the landfill. The school does not allow first year students to have cars on campus, provides shuttles to the town,<br />

prohibits cars from driving on campus, and provides a bike lending program to the college community.<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

Joseph Bryan Swartley<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

61%<br />

S<br />

39%<br />

68<br />

50<br />

33<br />

14<br />

19 11<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 8 14 57 Good<br />

Management 17 63 27 Needs improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 8 14 57 Good<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 9 77 12 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 18 35 51 Good<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

52<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong> is engaged in the issues of sustainability through water conservation projects, sustainable landscaping techniques, and reduction<br />

of pest management. The environmental council advises the college through environmental speakers, workshops, and student involvement (i.e.<br />

EcoCampus and Campus Garden groups) so that their environmental vision is attained. To address climate change, Grinnell has invested in a twoyear<br />

green power contract for the dorms to experiment with using renewable energy. The college uses 100% recycled paper in offices and promote<br />

green transportation and commuting to work on bicycles. As far at Grinnell’s code of conduct, it explicitly illustrates employment policies and<br />

opportunities for advancement as well as social and human rights.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

49%<br />

S<br />

51%<br />

68<br />

58<br />

12<br />

14<br />

0<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 63 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 10 60 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

53<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong> does a pretty good job of working towards sustainability. The mission statement for sustainability at Hamilton <strong>College</strong> reads: “As<br />

leaders in education and environmental stewardship, students, faculty, and staff at Hamilton <strong>College</strong> are committed to protecting and sustaining the<br />

environment through institutional processes, management of facilities, and curriculum. This leadership extends across the environmental spectrum<br />

from greenhouse gas reduction to preventing pollution of natural resources.” The mission statement goes on to list a set of goals that the <strong>College</strong> is<br />

working towards. Hamilton has taken many steps towards practicing sustainability. For instance, in 2007, Hamilton <strong>College</strong> joined the American<br />

<strong>College</strong> and University President’s Climate Committee (ACUPCC). Additionally, Hamilton participated in Power Shift 2009, which included high school<br />

students in the conference. It also has a very informative, easy to use website called “Building Dashboard” that is dedicated to comparing energy<br />

and electricity consumption in different buildings of the school. It gives the perspective of dollars spent or saved, energy saved, how many miles<br />

that would be saved, etc. I haven’t seen a site like this on any of the other schools that I have researched; it’s pretty useful and puts things into<br />

perspective.<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

60%<br />

S<br />

40%<br />

56<br />

56<br />

28<br />

7<br />

14<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 9 14 64 Good<br />

Management 10 63 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 4 42 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

54<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong> publishes a Sustainability Policy Statement on its web site, has a LEED certification for one of its residence halls, and<br />

addresses a few of the PSI topics such as greening of the dining halls, minimizing landscape water usage, and installation of its 60 panel photovoltaic<br />

dorm-top installation. Mostly these are qualitative accounts with precious few data. This seems a little surprising considering the intensely<br />

quantitative nature of a Harvey Mudd education. The main quantitative and substantive contribution is a detailed consultant’s report on tuning up<br />

campus buildings.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

83%<br />

S<br />

17%<br />

56<br />

17<br />

22<br />

0<br />

0 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Harvey Mudd<br />

<strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 6 83 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 1 63 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 4 28 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

55<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

The Haverford Sustainability program is centered on its Committee for Environmental Responsibility. This committee was founded on the socially<br />

responsible principles of the college. On the website it states, “CER has a deep concern and respect for all communities of which it is a part, both<br />

social and ecological. Our mission, therefore, is to educate our community towards an awareness of global concerns and to set a positive example<br />

of forward thinking, environmental stewardship for our campus and for other colleges to follow.” In order to do this, CER works to ensure that<br />

environmental concern is an integral part of Haverford <strong>College</strong>’s daily life informing our curriculum, administrative decisions and maintenance of<br />

facilities and grounds. Currently, Haverford is making an attempt to reach 100% wind power as its source of energy. •The student organization Food<br />

Fight is an active participant in Haverford sustainability. The organization seeks to protect the environment and human health through the prevention<br />

of eco-friendly, tasty food on campus. They work to re-establish a connection between people and their food, educate the Haverford community<br />

about food related issues, and promote the purchasing of local and sustainable foods.<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

50%<br />

S<br />

50%<br />

65<br />

64<br />

25<br />

22<br />

2<br />

11<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 12 63 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 3 28 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 12 77 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 15 35 43 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 3 42 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

56<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D+<br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong>’s Office of Environmental Health and Safety includes a comprehensive section on sustainability, including recycling, green<br />

electronics, energy efficiency, and student involvement. Unfortunately, the information is mostly cursory, and the college fails to report any<br />

quantitative social or environmental data. Furthermore, Kenyon <strong>College</strong>’s web pages do not mention the importance of climate change mitigation,<br />

habitat conservation, or the preservation of biodiversity. Several other pressing environmental and social issues are also ignored in the college’s<br />

sustainability reporting. Kenyon can improve its score by providing quantitative information, such as emissions and energy use, and expanding its<br />

qualitative reporting.<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

27%<br />

S<br />

73%<br />

36<br />

24<br />

13<br />

2 4<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 6 50 Good<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 2 21 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

57<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong> intends to expand its sustainability beyond its campus as well as to take sustainability initiatives for future generations. One of the<br />

ways Lafayette intends to do this is through a program called LEAP, which is a student-led environmental organization. Other partners in the<br />

<strong>College</strong>’s mission are the Campus Sustainability Committee, the Office of Plant Operations, and the Department of Facilities Planning and<br />

Construction. Lafayette’s dining services are provided through Sodexo. The company’s commitment to sustainability includes composting,<br />

biodegradable and compostable products, organic foods, local growers, and green waste management. This assists Lafayette in reducing its impact<br />

on the environment. Lafayette buys food from local vendors such as Sysco Central, Balford Farms and others. It also utilizes local in-season produce<br />

such as mushrooms, corn, apples, and tomatoes, and offers fair trade and organic coffee, practices “cook to order” techniques, and provides<br />

organic and natural produce. Green packaging is made available at the dining halls, including green-ware cups that are made from corn starch,<br />

compostable to-go containers, and compostable trash bags.<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

53%<br />

S<br />

47%<br />

56<br />

58<br />

18<br />

12<br />

0<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

58<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong> is dedicated to student involvement in environmental programs that address climate change, biodiversity, and green<br />

purchasing. “Environmental State of the <strong>College</strong>,” prepared as part of a senior seminar, discusses Macalester’s successes and failures for ten<br />

different sustainability topics and then provides recommendations based on best practices at other institutions. The discussion of best practices at<br />

peer institutions seems to be the most effective component of the report. Students are encouraged to get involved with the community through<br />

volunteering in community development and environmental education. There is no information on human rights of the employees. Macalester<br />

<strong>College</strong> reported on Greenreportcard.org several statistics that were not on its website. First, that 60% of the college uses "green seal" cleaning<br />

products. Second, that in 2007, its GHG emissions reached 19,350 metric tons of CO2, 10.33 metric tons of CO2 per student. Finally, Macalester<br />

should include its Electronics Recycling Program that accepts batteries, cell phones, computers, light bulbs, and printer cartridges.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

65%<br />

S<br />

35%<br />

71<br />

50<br />

30<br />

5<br />

12<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 5 14 36 Needs improvement<br />

Management 15 63 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

59<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

The Environmental Council at Middlebury <strong>College</strong> is dedicated to environmental sustainability, and many student programs are involved in habitat<br />

and energy conservation. Through lunch seminars with lectures about energy conservation, the administration, the student body, and community<br />

are educated in pressing environmental issues. Twenty percent of the college’s total waste is composted and dining halls purchase local food and<br />

recycle the waste at composting sites, later used as fertilizer. The Franklin Environmental Center is LEED platinum certified and is a sustainable and<br />

completely green building. <strong>College</strong> vehicles run on biodiesel and Zipcars are available to students. Middlebury’s efforts for a sustainable and low<br />

energy consumption campus are very effective. The code of conduct and human rights information is limited. Middlebury reported on<br />

Greenreportcard.org their greenhouse gas emissions in metric tons of carbon dioxide: 2006, 28,310, 2007, 27,787, and 2008, 28,742.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

59%<br />

S<br />

41%<br />

62<br />

50<br />

17<br />

7<br />

10 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 6 63 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 7 21 33 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

60<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Mount Holyoke’s mission statement mentions educating the college community about ecological responsibility that is both locally and globally<br />

focused, looking at environmental justice as not only pertaining to the students, but as to each person, place, and living system. There is a new<br />

program to minimize energy consumption. Within this program students will pledge to enable energy saving features on their computers. The school<br />

purchased “green energy” to run all student computers for a year. The school also extends edge to faculty and staff. This program also expands into<br />

other energy saving techniques broadening their focus to a larger community. There is also a lot of advice on recycling, but all presented in a fairly<br />

disorganized way. The use of fertilizer is mentioned, but only to compare the difference between organic compost and organic fertilizer treatments.<br />

There is information on manure use, and soil runoff for the Stony Broke land use in 1985, but nothing more recent or specific.<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

74%<br />

S<br />

26%<br />

82<br />

50<br />

40<br />

7<br />

8 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Mount Holyoke<br />

<strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 9 14 64 Good<br />

Management 13 63 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 10 14 71 Good<br />

Waste 4 28 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

61<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report 2009 Web Pages<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong> provides a campus climate that is willing to discuss, create, and implement sustainability and sustainable practices. Oberlin has<br />

made it clear that they are dedicated to sustainability not only in ideology but in ways that run deeper, through the school’s administration, student<br />

involvement, building planning and academic offerings. For students there are a number of resources available to be active in maintaining green<br />

practices on campus, such as volunteering on George Jones Farm and Nature Preserve on Oberlin’s campus, from which fresh fruits and vegetables<br />

are used in the dining hall’s Farm to Fork program. This great program budgets a significant percentage of dining hall purchases for local foods that<br />

students can enjoy. Another option for students is the Green EDGE Fund, which provides funding for environmentally conscious and motivated<br />

projects proposed by Oberlin students. This program offers two kinds of funds; an efficiency loan, which is paid back not with money but rather by<br />

the monetary savings provided by the project and a sustainability grant, which requires no payback at all. Students are also offered housing with<br />

sustainable themes as well as the student-run Oberlin Student Cooperative Association, which provides cooperative student housing and dining.<br />

The administration also provides the students with a commitment to have all new buildings on campus align with the U.S. Green Building Council’s<br />

Leadership in Environmental Design (LEED) silver standard. This will add to the preexisting sustainable buildings and systems on the campus, such<br />

as the Living Machine Wastewater Treatment System, and the Adam Joseph Lewis Center for Environmental Studies. Oberlin has made it clear that<br />

it is dedicated to sustainability not only in ideology, but in ways that run deeper, through the school’s administration, student involvement, building<br />

planning and academic offerings.<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

64%<br />

S<br />

36%<br />

79<br />

32<br />

36<br />

17<br />

5<br />

11<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 7 14 50 Good<br />

Management 10 63 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 8 21 38 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 4 28 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 15 35 43 Needs improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

62<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

63<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D-<br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Overall, Occidental <strong>College</strong> still has a way to go in regards to sustainability. The good practices that the school has implemented include good<br />

administration, food, recycling, and green building policy. Unfortunately this does not make up for the lack of information provided for public<br />

consumption. I would recommend that Occidental <strong>College</strong> invest in creating a environmental and sustainability faculty or staff post. And also to<br />

make the information that it does have readily available by posting it on its website.<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

80%<br />

S<br />

20%<br />

15<br />

5<br />

2<br />

0 0<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 8 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 6 50 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 2 35 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

64<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong> has many web pages detailing various sustainability issues and initiatives, plus a student-generated sustainability audit with a<br />

considerable amount of background information, but quantitative data for most topics were lacking.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

71%<br />

S<br />

29%<br />

76<br />

36<br />

18<br />

5<br />

6 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 8 63 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 1 77 1 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

65<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong> has a Sustainability Integration Office staffed by a full time director, and, using a consulting engineering firm, did an extraordinarily<br />

detailed campus sustainability audit in 2008. The <strong>College</strong> has subsequently produced a GHG inventory report, a climate action plan, and a relatively<br />

brief but highly informative 2008-2009 sustainability annual report, along with a variety of hyperlinked web pages, all of which were available on the<br />

<strong>College</strong> website in autumn, 2009, when this analysis was done. We analyzed over 1000 pages of material from the Pomona <strong>College</strong> website,<br />

including the aforementioned reports plus a large number of hyperlinked web pages, and were impressed with the level of organization, number of<br />

initiatives, and general professional approach to making the campus as sustainable as possible. The lack of materials scored by the PSI in its social<br />

section was largely responsible for Pomona’s low ranking.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

76%<br />

S<br />

24%<br />

91<br />

36<br />

28<br />

4<br />

10 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 8 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 11 14 79 Excellent<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Water 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

66<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong> 2009 Susttainability Report<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong> is committed to creating a sustainable campus and to raising awareness about environmental issues. Reed promotes action on<br />

campus that positively affects the community, city, and the whole world. Reed implements these initiatives with classes, lectures, committees,<br />

programs, and more specifically targeted at being more sustainability and increasing awareness. Reed defines sustainability as meeting the<br />

resource needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Reed <strong>College</strong> has a Sustainability<br />

Committee that specifically focuses on enforcing the sustainability policies and programs. Some of the clubs that are working on sustainability<br />

issues are the Homestead House(Farm House), The Student Senate, Greenboard, Green Computing Task Force, Green Science Project, Reed<br />

Canyon, Reed Bike Co-op, Reed Transportation Committee, and Food Services. Reed has also adopted certain practices that led to the conservation<br />

of energy and reduction of waste such as Dorm Challenges, increase of green transportation, new green buildings, and better waste management.<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong> is making numerous strides at creating a more sustainable community. These strides are tangible and noticeable and cause a shift in<br />

college life for the better.<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

61%<br />

S<br />

39%<br />

88<br />

65<br />

15<br />

16<br />

0<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 5 8 63 Good<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 21 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 21 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 7 10 70 Good<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 7 42 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

67<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Richmond University<br />

Richmond University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Richmond University has been very vocal about its commitment to sustainability, signing both the Presidents Climate Commitment and the Talloires<br />

Declaration. Beyond simply talking about sustainability, the university has taken action to promote the sustainability of its campus. In 2003, the<br />

university built its first LEED certified building and in the last few years all new buildings have been LEED certified, while all major renovations have<br />

focused on sustainable design strategies. In keeping with these sustainable design strategies, the University has made a significant investment in<br />

reducing its power and water consumption, installing new more efficient equipment over the last several years. Indeed in almost every area<br />

imaginable, from transportation to dining, Richmond has several sustainability initiatives in place with more on the way. The sheer number of<br />

sustainability initiatives at Richmond is impressive, however it is hard to judge how effective these initiative are because the university publishes<br />

very little quantitative data on its website. The data that can be found rarely have a frame of reference making it impossible to tell how much of a<br />

difference the initiatives are making. As a result there is a possibility that Richmond is doing a better job making its campus sustainable than is<br />

indicated by our analysis, because the lack of data available has made it difficult to judge the true impact of many of Richmond’s initiatives.<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

70%<br />

S<br />

30%<br />

56<br />

28<br />

13<br />

2<br />

3 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Richmond University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 63 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 10 60 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 3 35 9 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

68<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong> has a main web page on sustainability efforts touching on some of the topics considered by the PSI, and a few linked pages with<br />

additional detail, but most topics remain unaddressed and there are no quantitative data presented at all.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

0%<br />

38<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

100%<br />

6<br />

0 0 0 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 6 67 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

69<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Sewanee <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Sewanee had a clear environmental statement and policy as well as information on impediments and challenges. The historical report of Sewanee<br />

<strong>College</strong> was interesting and helpful in understanding the progression of the college’s environmental policy. In the final appendix of the<br />

environmental policy, the college is taking productive steps toward a more environmentally responsible campus and the students are active in<br />

employing an environmentally responsible president. The internal competition between the dorms is a beneficial idea to encourage better<br />

environmental living practices. Sewanee has been received awards for its community development and ample volunteer and student activism, and<br />

has developed an organic garden and organic beef purchasing. There was thorough information on energy and renewable energy use. Water<br />

usage and wastewater information was available and indicated improvement but the data available were too old. Sewanee <strong>College</strong> produced no<br />

information on land use, pesticide use, green material used, or fertilizer use. Greenhouse gas emissions of any kind were not reported. There was<br />

no information on the endowment, environmental fines or expenses or investment practices. However, the information produced for the endowment<br />

and expenses on greenreportcard.org was extensive and if that was made public, it would imporve Sewanee's score. Sewanee has no concrete<br />

numerical goals for the future, with the exception of the energy produced, and was limited information on its recycling practices. Hazardous waste<br />

released and produced was not reported, nor was there any data on environmental violations, accident rates, or health and safety citations. Human<br />

rights information is lacking, only a little information about the sexual harassment and equal opportunity policy and no information on lost workday<br />

case rate.<br />

Marissa L. Garvin<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

70%<br />

S<br />

30%<br />

59<br />

17<br />

5 8 12<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Sewanee--University<br />

of the South<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 7 10 70 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 6 83 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 8 14 57 Good<br />

Management 2 63 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 4 28 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 1 77 1 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

70<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Quantitative Social 2 42 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

71<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong> has made great leaps in becoming a highly environmental and socially responsible campus. Though it has not signed onto the<br />

Presidents’ Climate Commitment, it has adopted its own similar commitment involving reducing greenhouse gas emissions by a set target date. The<br />

college currently has numerous programs in place to meet these targets and shrink its carbon footprint. A unique program in place at Skidmore is its<br />

Eco-Reps program, involving students from each residence hall acting as sustainability advisors to the other students and promoting<br />

environmentally friendly habits and events. On Skidmore’s sustainability website, students can read about the different habits they can adopt to live<br />

a more environmentally responsible life. Events throughout the year, including “Skidmore Unplugged”, a residence hall competition to achieve the<br />

highest energy savings, also encourage student involvement and promote environmental awareness. The college is also committed to its North<br />

Woods program that aims to preserve the natural ecosystem for study and recreational purposes. Instead of developing this land, Skidmore pledges<br />

to protect 200 acres through 2050. However, the Skidmore <strong>College</strong> web pages fail to include any quantitative data on energy use, water use, or<br />

waste disposed of and recycled. To improve its score, more past and current data need to be analyzed and published on the college’s web pages.<br />

While Skidmore is planning to enact more sustainability initiatives, more work needs to be done to set specific goals and targets.<br />

Joseph Bryan Swartley<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

50%<br />

S<br />

50%<br />

74<br />

64<br />

19<br />

16 15<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 10 63 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 16 35 46 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

72<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B+<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong>, like many colleges across the nation has committed to sustainable practices and education. It has pledged to conserve and to<br />

support the sustainable use of natural resources through policies, programs, and practices. In comparison to other colleges, <strong>Amherst</strong> stands as a<br />

beacon for sustainable goals. <strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong> is very environmentally and socially aware, and it works to bring sustainability issues to the forefront<br />

of discussion. Along with major changes in structure, such as an increase in green building, <strong>Amherst</strong> has made sustainability an everyday practice.<br />

With an increase in transportation sharing programs such as Zipcar, and even smaller implementations such as placing eco-friendly napkin<br />

dispensers in the dining halls to reduce the amount of wasted napkins, sustainability has become a way of life for many <strong>Amherst</strong> students and<br />

faculty. The <strong>College</strong> also has the ability to get campus involvement in more abstract forms of sustainability such as getting more than 1,700 students<br />

and faculty to pledge to place their computers on sleep mode when idle. With a decrease in waste, an increase in recycling, the use of clean<br />

renewable energy, local organic food production, mixed with campus awareness and participation <strong>Amherst</strong> should reach all goals relatively soon.<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

47%<br />

S<br />

53%<br />

56<br />

53<br />

13<br />

14<br />

0<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 6 63 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 7 7 100 Excellent<br />

Qualitative Social 13 35 37 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

73<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

In 2008, <strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong> collaborated with Jerusalem’s Al-Quds University to form the first dual-degree collaboration between a Palestinian University<br />

and an American institution of higher education. Al-Quds <strong>Bard</strong> is set to open in phases in 2009-2010 and center on the Honors <strong>College</strong> for Liberal<br />

Arts and Sciences, the Master of Arts in Teaching (MAT) Program, and the Model School. To help reduce building costs <strong>Bard</strong> is evaluating using the<br />

United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) process for campus construction. NYSERDA has<br />

awarded the college $200,000 to install a solar thermal heating system at the Stevenson Gymnasium. The project is expected to reduce fuel oil use<br />

by 25%. <strong>Bard</strong> is an Energy Star campus. In <strong>Bard</strong>’s employee handbook in the Environmental Policy section, staff is encouraged to sort and collect<br />

bottles and cans, cardboard, and paper products. <strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong> President Leon Botstein received the 2009 Carnegie Corporation Academic<br />

Leadership Award of $500,000 for effecting positive change, not only for students, but also for the local community and the world at large.<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

56<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

54%<br />

S<br />

46%<br />

33<br />

33<br />

26<br />

17<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 6 83 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Management 15 63 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 3 28 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 26 77 34 Needs improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 13 35 37 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 2 42 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

74<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

In its mission statement, <strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong> has a specific goal of how much it would like to reduce emissions and states it is fully committed to<br />

environmental sustainability. In 2007, two students and a faculty member constructed a <strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report. This report gives a<br />

brief overview of where <strong>Barnard</strong> stands in relation to certain environmental issues and describes how the students, faculty, and administration play<br />

a role in sustainability at <strong>Barnard</strong>. This was something nearly unique; the only other school that had its own sustainability report in 2007 (as far as<br />

we are aware) is Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong>. <strong>Barnard</strong>’s sustainability website also has a Technical Energy and Water Savings audit which<br />

documents goals, analyzes energy use, and develops short term and long term plans for <strong>Barnard</strong>. This was a useful resource for grasping numerical<br />

initiatives and improvements for the institution. Overall, although <strong>Barnard</strong> mentions much of what is used on the PSI scoring sheets, I would not<br />

necessarily say that it is doing an exceptional job in maintaining a sustainable campus. The <strong>College</strong> could do a better job listing specific goals and<br />

numbers about consumption on campus in order to paint a more vivid picture of actual improvements or work being done, if any.<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

63%<br />

S<br />

37%<br />

71<br />

72<br />

31<br />

9<br />

9 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 18 63 29 Needs improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 6 28 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

75<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong> had a clear visionary statement that included how it was acting on environmental challenges, and there was information about its<br />

environmental administration and management system. <strong>Bates</strong> has LEED certified buildings and active recycling, and green food practices and<br />

purchasing were well reported along with transportation initiatives and detailed student involvement. <strong>Bates</strong> has also been involved in social and<br />

environmental community development. There was some discussion of rationale and procedures for choosing environmental initiatives and targets,<br />

and the historical progression of <strong>Bates</strong>’ environmental policy and initiatives was an interesting and useful resource. But there was no mention of<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> position on habitat conservation or biodiversity, no information on age gender or race/ethnicity, supplier screening, employment of individuals<br />

with disabilities or on employee training, and no information on environmental accounting (expenses and fines). Investment priorities were not<br />

reported either, but <strong>Bates</strong> reported to greenreportcard.org that its holdings were available to certain administrators; if this information were made<br />

public it would improve <strong>Bates</strong>’ PSI score. There were no data on hazardous waste produced or released either, but there was discussion of several<br />

key environmental factors such as total greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy used, waste disposed of, and water recycled. There were no<br />

recordable incidents or accident incidences reported. Pesticide and fertilizer use were not reported and land use was only briefly discussed. Health<br />

and safety precautions or citations were not well reported, nor was human rights compliance.<br />

Marissa L. Garvin<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

75%<br />

S<br />

25%<br />

79<br />

30<br />

33<br />

4<br />

8 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 7 8 88 Excellent<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 8 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 7 14 50 Good<br />

Management 14 63 22 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 8 35 23 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

76<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

“Sustainability is more than an intellectual concept at Bowdoin.” Bowdoin <strong>College</strong> has definitely committed itself to making sure sustainability<br />

reaches every point of learning and practice at the institution. Along with the Environmental Studies major, students can “pair up” this major with<br />

another, such as Geology, Physics or even English. Such unique coordination offers students a holistic view of sustainability and the world. Students<br />

also participate in EcoReps, an organization that helps foster communication between students and administration to improve student life and its<br />

commitment to environmental issues. Bowdoin also has participated for a third year in a row in Recycle Mania, a nationwide recycling competition,<br />

thus showing how sustainability is a concern that reaches outside of the campus. Transportation is another aspect Bowdoin tries to incorporate into<br />

its sustainability vision. It has created several ways for students and employees to carpool or look for other ways of traveling off campus. Some of<br />

these methods include the Bowdoin Yellow Bike Club which provides bicycles across campus, the Bowdoin <strong>College</strong> Ride Share Board, an online<br />

forum which helps students communicate with one another to get transportation, the Bowdoin Shuttle Service which provides students with<br />

transportation on campus while classes are in session, and lastly, a ZipCar fleet which allows students and employees to rent cars by the hour.<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

69%<br />

S<br />

31%<br />

82<br />

56<br />

22<br />

11<br />

5 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Bowdoin <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 8 14 57 Good<br />

Management 4 63 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 9 14 64 Good<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 3 35 9 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

77<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong> is strongly dedicated to energy conservation. It has had several workshops dedicated to renewable energy (specifically<br />

windmills) and continue to increase its green purchasing by using LED lights in signs. A campus group called “The Greens” has been initiated to get<br />

students educated and involved with sustainability initiatives and get the support from administrators as well. Bryn Mawr claims to have the lowest<br />

energy consumption of any of its peers and has started an Energy Diet that reduces dorm energy consumption by 12%. For the dining halls, the<br />

college purchases some organic food, and recycles waste oil by using it as biodiesel, and there is a recycling program on campus. There is no<br />

information about campus greenhouse gas emissions however. The social policy statement is limited; most of the information is in the Honor Code.<br />

Bryn Mawr does report that 49% of its faculty is female and that there is an effort to increase the attendance of women. There is no information<br />

about safety incident rates or health and safety fines, but there is an Environmental Health and Safety office, which manages occupational health<br />

and safety protection. Through its student-run organizations, Bryn Mawr demonstrates efforts in community development, education, and<br />

volunteerism. Overall Bryn Mawr offers a large amount of information about energy, green buildings and green transportation. It needs to develop<br />

more environmental initiatives and select performance indicators to get feedback. It would be useful to widen its environmental awareness;<br />

although it appears to be doing an admirable job in conserving energy, other areas of the environment including biodiversity, habitat conservation,<br />

and global warming are unaddressed.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

43%<br />

S<br />

57%<br />

44<br />

50<br />

8<br />

12<br />

0<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Bryn Mawr <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 8 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 6 83 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 63 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

78<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

A-<br />

Bucknell University<br />

Bucknell University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Bucknell University has an extremely detailed Comprehensive Environmental Assessment on its website, one of the most thorough we have seen,<br />

providing an exemplary model for those conducting similar analyses. It explicitly avoids most social aspects of sustainability reporting, hence its<br />

score on the PSI is not has high as might be expected for such a massive effort, but we imagine that a social analysis can't be far behind. A<br />

particularly interesting feature is its formal discussion of letter grades Bucknell received on the Sustainable Endowments Institute's "2008 <strong>College</strong><br />

Sustainability Report Card" and responses which produced better results in 2009. A few of the topics covered in the analysis are listed below: The<br />

fuel efficiency is recorded for all Bucknell University vehicles. The frequency of North American native trees on campus is recorded. Pesticides and<br />

fertilizers used are listed. The Campus Greening Council is made up of students, faculty, and staff, who make environmental policy<br />

recommendations to the administration. The Environmental Management Assistance Program serves to reduce raw material purchase costs,<br />

reduce compliance burdens and costs associated with environmental permits, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, reduce waste<br />

management, treatment and disposal costs, and reduce long-term liabilities associated with hazardous waste management. In 1998 Bucknell’s<br />

power plant was converted from a conventional coal-burning facility to a co-generation power plan fueled by natural gas. This conversion has led to<br />

a 40% reduction in the University’s greenhouse gas emissions. Beginning in 2000 Bucknell began purchasing wind power to supplement its on-site<br />

power generation. As of January 2008, wind power represented 100% of Bucknell’s purchased energy, for a total of approximately 4 million kilowatt<br />

hours per year. Bucknell students can report incidents of abuse by the Lewisburg Police, Penn. State Police, E. Buffalo Police, or Public Safety to<br />

the Bucknell Student Government. Since Spring of 2008 the Dining program has distributed "E-comment" cards. The responses are displayed via a<br />

digital picture frame outside the Bostwick marketplace. Coffee is purchased from a particular plantation community in Nicaragua. This is done in<br />

compliance with "Free Trade Coffee."<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

70%<br />

S<br />

30%<br />

76<br />

52<br />

39<br />

14<br />

20<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Bucknell University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 5 14 36 Needs improvement<br />

Management 21 63 33 Needs improvement<br />

Materials usage 11 21 52 Good<br />

Recycling 9 14 64 Good<br />

Waste 10 28 36 Needs improvement<br />

Water 5 7 71 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 7 10 70 Good<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 5 77 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

79<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 14 35 40 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 4 42 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

80<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

“Assessing Carleton’s Sustainability: A Campus Environmental Audit” was conducted as a student project with help from Good Company and its<br />

“Sustainable Pathways Toolkit.” The report is structured as a collection of indicators and associated goals, benchmarks and recommendations. The<br />

report does an excellent job at noting areas in which institutional policy could be introduced to improve environmental sustainability. Nevertheless,<br />

without direct institutional support, the report is incapable of demonstrating institutional intent or discussing management systems. Also, the report<br />

fails to touch on social sustainability, greatly reducing its total PSI score.<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

74%<br />

S<br />

26%<br />

91<br />

31<br />

22<br />

7<br />

9<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Carleton <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 5 8 63 Good<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 11 63 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 2 21 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 5 28 18 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 7 10 70 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

81<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D+<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Centre <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong> has signed the President's Climate Commitment, and has assigned committees to work out the details, but the material online is very<br />

limited, with almost no quantitative goals and very little other quantitative information. Mostly it seems to be whatever seemed interesting to the<br />

public relations staff, but with no systematic treatment of the issues.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

66%<br />

S<br />

34%<br />

41<br />

22<br />

6<br />

0<br />

3 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 0 21 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 3 28 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 3 35 9 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

82<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Colby <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong> has done a truly outstanding job of addressing the need for education about the environmental challenges of today. The <strong>College</strong><br />

started its environmental studies program in the 1970’s and has been alerting students to sustainability problems ever since. This is reflected in the<br />

number of different green programs Colby students are involved in, from lobbying Capitol Hill about climate change to giving out florescent light<br />

bulbs to save energy, Colby students are trying to bring about change on their campus, in their state, and in their country. The administration at<br />

Colby deserves praise for more than just fostering and supporting the initiatives and actions of its students. In 2003 Colby made the historic shift to<br />

100% renewable power, a costly initiative that demonstrated the <strong>College</strong>’s commitment to the environment. The <strong>College</strong> considers both its<br />

environmental impact and its endowment when making purchasing decisions and has found ways to take care of both, building LEED certified<br />

buildings that use less power and purchasing washers that use less water and detergent. It is clear that Colby has a large number of sustainability<br />

initiatives in place, however in some cases the <strong>College</strong> hasn’t posted the numerical results of these initiatives which have made it hard to judge the<br />

effect of many of them.<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

80%<br />

S<br />

20%<br />

50<br />

21<br />

28<br />

7<br />

0 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Colby <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 5 7 71 Good<br />

Energy 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Management 5 63 8 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 7 21 33 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 1 6 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 1 77 1 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

83<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Colgate University<br />

Colgate University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Sustainability at Colgate begins with a strong environmental visionary statement, and is followed by extensive policies and initiatives that will help<br />

the <strong>College</strong> realize its vision. Along with discussing several of the most pertinent environmental and social issues, Colgate also reports its energy<br />

consumption and the amount of waste disposed of. While much of Colgate’s web site details school-wide programs and quantitative information,<br />

Colgate also highlights the importance of student environmental education. For example, Colgate’s Guide to Green Living provides students with tips<br />

to reduce their energy and water consumption. Colgate also provides students with opportunities to get involved in the <strong>College</strong>’s sustainability<br />

mission. Colgate University provides an adequate example of basic sustainability reporting for a college, but there is clearly room for improvement.<br />

The University needs to begin covering more topics and reporting more quantitative data.<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

55%<br />

S<br />

45%<br />

50<br />

44<br />

18<br />

12<br />

2<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Colgate University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 6 67 Good<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 3 63 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 6 21 29 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 5 28 18 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 7 10 70 Good<br />

Policy 1 6 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 5 77 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

84<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross 2009 Web Pages<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross, like many other colleges committed to sustainability, has joined the American <strong>College</strong> & University Presidents Climate<br />

Commitment. It has set a short term goal of reducing “carbon emissions by 2015, and a long term goal of carbon neutrality by 2040.” Theses<br />

quantitative goals are supplemented with everyday practices at Holy Cross. With new construction occurring around campus, Holy Cross seeks to<br />

have LEED silver certification for every new building constructed. The latest, The Integrated Science Complex, “will have constant volume low flow<br />

hoods utilizing 30% less exhaust air than standard hoods.” Numbers and goals like these make sustainability an exciting new concept for everyone.<br />

Students are also making sustainability a tangible practice on campus. A community garden has been created to grow vegetables and fruits so that<br />

more organic produce will be available for the Holy Cross community. Students also participate in projects and internships at non-profit<br />

organizations within the Worchester area. The Environmental Studies program provides students with information and resources where “all things<br />

sustainable” can be known of and implemented. The student environmental group, Eco-Action, focuses on issues such as global warming on a<br />

national scale to issues of local land preservation.<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

65%<br />

S<br />

35%<br />

50<br />

33<br />

25<br />

10<br />

2<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

<strong>College</strong> of the Holy<br />

Cross<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 1 2 50 Good<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 6 67 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 5 7 71 Good<br />

Energy 7 14 50 Good<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 10 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 7 10 70 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

85<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B+<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong> has proven itself to be a leader in sustainability practices. The Campus Sustainability Council, Office of Sustainability, and<br />

numerous student groups have worked to promote on-campus sustainability and the initiatives of the Presidents’ Climate Commitment, of which<br />

President Richard Celeste is a signatory. In June 2008, the college released its Environmental Inventory and Sustainability Management Plan with<br />

the help of an engineering consulting group. This document, available on the college website, gives recommendations for improving energy<br />

efficiency, cutting down on greenhouse gas emissions, reducing water usage, improving transportation, etc. •Colorado <strong>College</strong> has already<br />

supported numerous such projects. A solar electric system with a capacity of 25-kW was installed on top of the Edith Gaylord Apartments. Both the<br />

science and arts centers have earned LEED certifications, and the administration pledges to reach LEED certification for all new buildings. Bon<br />

Appetit has been providing food services since 2008 and has stressed the importance of local and organic food, even buying fruits and vegetables<br />

from the student-run, sustainable Colorado <strong>College</strong> Garden. Furthermore, the college aims to set up a sustainable investment fund which will<br />

generate income through investments that are both environmentally and socially responsible.<br />

Joseph Bryan Swartley<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

58%<br />

S<br />

42%<br />

79<br />

75<br />

36<br />

18<br />

0<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Colorado <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 5 14 36 Needs improvement<br />

Management 12 63 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 12 77 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

86<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong> employs a full-time environmental coordinator and makes contact readily available. The college also has many goals regarding<br />

the practice and policy of sustainability and has come a long way from past years towards implementing them. There is a problem, however, in the<br />

amount of performance reported. With all of the great things taking place on Connecticut’s campus, such as the reduction of 20% of greenhouse gas<br />

emissions since 2004 and the large amount of renewable energy purchased, the information available on many of the topics considered in the PSI is<br />

subpar. Connecticut <strong>College</strong>, however, appears to be aware of this shortcoming and I believe that with the help of the environmental coordinator,<br />

the college will not only increase its sustainability practices but also more thoroughly and readily report it.<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

Rishabh Rajen Parekh<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

75%<br />

S<br />

25%<br />

76<br />

21<br />

19<br />

0<br />

9 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Connecticut <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 12 63 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 4 35 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

87<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Although Davidson <strong>College</strong> published a 2009 Sustainability Report, the college’s reporting still lags behind the reporting of some of its peer<br />

institutions. A progressive Climate Action Plan is in place to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but current quantitative data regarding emissions<br />

and energy use are not reported. Davidson touches on several of the most important social and environmental issues and has a few initiatives that<br />

promote both student and administrative involvement. These initiatives and goals have resulted in improvements in areas such as bottled water and<br />

energy usage and recycling; however, in general Davidson <strong>College</strong>’s reporting shows considerable room for improvement.<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

55%<br />

S<br />

45%<br />

62<br />

44<br />

15<br />

15<br />

2<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Davidson <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 7 63 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 15 35 43 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 2 42 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

88<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

DePauw University<br />

DePauw University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Many of the categories in the PSI were answered by the President’s Statement and DePauw’s mission statement on page 19. One thing that I<br />

noticed about the mission statement as is often the case, was very general and without any specific proposed actions. I enjoyed the video about the<br />

new compost stations. It is a great way to bring awareness to the situation and the initiatives taken. I also enjoyed reading about the Carbon<br />

Footprint Project, but I would like to see current examples of what they have already done with this project and their results as of now. There is a<br />

“Get Involved” events calendar, but there were no future events listed, although there had been some good programs that involved the outside<br />

community. The DePauw Community Service volunteers in the community of Greencastle and I would like to see distinct examples of some of the<br />

projects DCS has done in the community and on campus, but I could not find any on the web site. Many of the projects and programs are student run<br />

and even though the majority of the people at the university are students, I would like to see exactly how the university gets their faculty and staff<br />

involved directly.<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

50%<br />

S<br />

50%<br />

68<br />

64<br />

20<br />

16 15<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

DePauw University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 6 21 29 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 21 35 60 Good<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

89<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong> is a leader in campus sustainability. Dr. William G. Durden, the president of Dickinson, signed the Presidents Climate Commitment<br />

in 2007 that has since become a core component of the <strong>College</strong>’s sustainability program. The <strong>College</strong> runs both an Office of Sustainability with hired<br />

sustainability coordinators and a Center for Environmental and Sustainability Education where a full time director was hired in 2008. Dickinson<br />

<strong>College</strong> has been recognized numerous times for its innovative execution of sustainable food service initiatives. The <strong>College</strong> dining services<br />

purchase from seven local farms and producers, including a local dairy farm. In addition, the Dickinson <strong>College</strong> Organic Farm has been developed to<br />

provide produce to the college’s dining services. By purchasing vegetables from the college farm at market price, dining services is saving food and<br />

transportation cost while also reinvesting more than $6,500 into the <strong>College</strong> farm in the last fiscal year. Investment priorities and shareholder<br />

engagement are two more exceptional areas of strength of the <strong>College</strong>, areas that the majority of other colleges struggle with. The <strong>College</strong> currently<br />

invests in socially screened funds, green funds, and community development funds. Additionally, a unique Socially Responsible Investment<br />

Discussion Group was formed in 2007 consisting of four students, four faculty members, one alumnus, and two administrators, all of whom study<br />

socially responsible and sustainable investment.<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

51%<br />

S<br />

49%<br />

71<br />

50<br />

15<br />

20<br />

5<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Dickinson <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 6 21 29 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

90<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Franklin and Marshall <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Franklin and Marshall’s environmental consciousness is definitely student focused; including, for example competitions such as Recyclemania,<br />

which resulted in approximately 30% of campus waste being recycled. The Environmental Action Alliance promotes environmentally responsible<br />

behavior on campus as well as running green programs throughout the campus. A way to bridge the gap between students and the administration<br />

at Franklin and Marshall is with the Campus Sustainability Committee, the committee is comprised of students, faculty and staff who advise the<br />

college president on environmental issues on campus and in the community. The committee’s most visible work is during Sustainability Week;<br />

through a series of events and campaigns the Week challenges the Franklin and Marshall community to be greener.<br />

Some other interesting initiatives the campus has implemented are through food services. The dining hall operates with a tray-less policy as well as<br />

the recycling of the fryer oil in the kitchen. The school also participates in green community outreach with student involvement and school support<br />

of the Eastern Market program -- managed by a Franklin and Marshall alumni -- which creates a local food network that provides healthy and fresh<br />

local food to the urban neighborhoods.<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

49%<br />

S<br />

51%<br />

59<br />

50<br />

17<br />

17<br />

9<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Franklin and<br />

Marshall <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 7 10 70 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 6 63 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 16 77 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 8 35 23 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

91<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Furman University<br />

Furman University 2009 Web Pages<br />

With the opening of the David E. Shi Center for Sustainability in July 2008, Furman University showcased its commitment to sustainability through a<br />

new focus on outreach programs, curricular development, and original research. Though the Shi Center is new, Furman’s engagement in<br />

sustainability is not. The board of trustees at Furman committed to promote sustainability over a decade ago and, in 2002, the Board voted to require<br />

all new buildings and renovations to meet a minimum of LEED silver certification. Six buildings are currently registered for LEED certification,<br />

including Cliffs Cottage, the carbon-neutral home of Furman's sustainability center that seeks a LEED Platinum rating. Students have worked hard in<br />

developing a new organic garden that will provide produce for the dining halls as well as receive compost from recyclable waste and food scraps<br />

from dining services. The college also purchases from 20 local farms and offers fair trade coffee and a variety of organic items.<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

63%<br />

S<br />

37%<br />

79<br />

42<br />

24<br />

14<br />

2<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Furman University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 8 63 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 5 77 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

92<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B+<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong>'s environmental strength lies in its student involvement. The <strong>College</strong> employs three students to work in sustainability-related<br />

programs. Student groups included Gettysburg Environmental Concerns Organization and Gettysburg Research and Action by Students for<br />

Sustainability. Student management also includes a campus kitchen recycling project and Painted Turtle Farm. All first year students are introduced<br />

to sustainability initiatives upon arrival in the residence halls, The dining services use local dairy products and most produce comes from local<br />

farmers or from the campus garden. Compost is collected for the campus garden and the college recycles cardboard, plastic, aluminum, and glass,<br />

diverting 24% of waste from the landfill. The school does not allow first year students to have cars on campus, provides shuttles to the town,<br />

prohibits cars from driving on campus, and provides a bike lending program to the college community.<br />

Markus Kessler<br />

Joseph Bryan Swartley<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

61%<br />

S<br />

39%<br />

68<br />

50<br />

33<br />

14<br />

19 11<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 8 14 57 Good<br />

Management 17 63 27 Needs improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 8 14 57 Good<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 9 77 12 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 18 35 51 Good<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

93<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong> is engaged in the issues of sustainability through water conservation projects, sustainable landscaping techniques, and reduction<br />

of pest management. The environmental council advises the college through environmental speakers, workshops, and student involvement (i.e.<br />

EcoCampus and Campus Garden groups) so that their environmental vision is attained. To address climate change, Grinnell has invested in a twoyear<br />

green power contract for the dorms to experiment with using renewable energy. The college uses 100% recycled paper in offices and promote<br />

green transportation and commuting to work on bicycles. As far at Grinnell’s code of conduct, it explicitly illustrates employment policies and<br />

opportunities for advancement as well as social and human rights.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

49%<br />

S<br />

51%<br />

68<br />

58<br />

12<br />

14<br />

0<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Grinnell <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 63 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 10 60 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

94<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong> does a pretty good job of working towards sustainability. The mission statement for sustainability at Hamilton <strong>College</strong> reads: “As<br />

leaders in education and environmental stewardship, students, faculty, and staff at Hamilton <strong>College</strong> are committed to protecting and sustaining the<br />

environment through institutional processes, management of facilities, and curriculum. This leadership extends across the environmental spectrum<br />

from greenhouse gas reduction to preventing pollution of natural resources.” The mission statement goes on to list a set of goals that the <strong>College</strong> is<br />

working towards. Hamilton has taken many steps towards practicing sustainability. For instance, in 2007, Hamilton <strong>College</strong> joined the American<br />

<strong>College</strong> and University President’s Climate Committee (ACUPCC). Additionally, Hamilton participated in Power Shift 2009, which included high school<br />

students in the conference. It also has a very informative, easy to use website called “Building Dashboard” that is dedicated to comparing energy<br />

and electricity consumption in different buildings of the school. It gives the perspective of dollars spent or saved, energy saved, how many miles<br />

that would be saved, etc. I haven’t seen a site like this on any of the other schools that I have researched; it’s pretty useful and puts things into<br />

perspective.<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

60%<br />

S<br />

40%<br />

56<br />

56<br />

28<br />

7<br />

14<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Hamilton <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 9 14 64 Good<br />

Management 10 63 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 4 42 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

95<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong><br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong> publishes a Sustainability Policy Statement on its web site, has a LEED certification for one of its residence halls, and<br />

addresses a few of the PSI topics such as greening of the dining halls, minimizing landscape water usage, and installation of its 60 panel photovoltaic<br />

dorm-top installation. Mostly these are qualitative accounts with precious few data. This seems a little surprising considering the intensely<br />

quantitative nature of a Harvey Mudd education. The main quantitative and substantive contribution is a detailed consultant’s report on tuning up<br />

campus buildings.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

83%<br />

S<br />

17%<br />

56<br />

17<br />

22<br />

0<br />

0 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Harvey Mudd<br />

<strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 6 83 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 1 63 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 4 28 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

96<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

The Haverford Sustainability program is centered on its Committee for Environmental Responsibility. This committee was founded on the socially<br />

responsible principles of the college. On the website it states, “CER has a deep concern and respect for all communities of which it is a part, both<br />

social and ecological. Our mission, therefore, is to educate our community towards an awareness of global concerns and to set a positive example<br />

of forward thinking, environmental stewardship for our campus and for other colleges to follow.” In order to do this, CER works to ensure that<br />

environmental concern is an integral part of Haverford <strong>College</strong>’s daily life informing our curriculum, administrative decisions and maintenance of<br />

facilities and grounds. Currently, Haverford is making an attempt to reach 100% wind power as its source of energy. •The student organization Food<br />

Fight is an active participant in Haverford sustainability. The organization seeks to protect the environment and human health through the prevention<br />

of eco-friendly, tasty food on campus. They work to re-establish a connection between people and their food, educate the Haverford community<br />

about food related issues, and promote the purchasing of local and sustainable foods.<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

50%<br />

S<br />

50%<br />

65<br />

64<br />

25<br />

22<br />

2<br />

11<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Haverford <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 12 63 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 3 28 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 12 77 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 15 35 43 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 3 42 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

97<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D+<br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong>’s Office of Environmental Health and Safety includes a comprehensive section on sustainability, including recycling, green<br />

electronics, energy efficiency, and student involvement. Unfortunately, the information is mostly cursory, and the college fails to report any<br />

quantitative social or environmental data. Furthermore, Kenyon <strong>College</strong>’s web pages do not mention the importance of climate change mitigation,<br />

habitat conservation, or the preservation of biodiversity. Several other pressing environmental and social issues are also ignored in the college’s<br />

sustainability reporting. Kenyon can improve its score by providing quantitative information, such as emissions and energy use, and expanding its<br />

qualitative reporting.<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

27%<br />

S<br />

73%<br />

36<br />

24<br />

13<br />

2 4<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Kenyon <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 6 50 Good<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 2 21 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

98<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong> intends to expand its sustainability beyond its campus as well as to take sustainability initiatives for future generations. One of the<br />

ways Lafayette intends to do this is through a program called LEAP, which is a student-led environmental organization. Other partners in the<br />

<strong>College</strong>’s mission are the Campus Sustainability Committee, the Office of Plant Operations, and the Department of Facilities Planning and<br />

Construction. Lafayette’s dining services are provided through Sodexo. The company’s commitment to sustainability includes composting,<br />

biodegradable and compostable products, organic foods, local growers, and green waste management. This assists Lafayette in reducing its impact<br />

on the environment. Lafayette buys food from local vendors such as Sysco Central, Balford Farms and others. It also utilizes local in-season produce<br />

such as mushrooms, corn, apples, and tomatoes, and offers fair trade and organic coffee, practices “cook to order” techniques, and provides<br />

organic and natural produce. Green packaging is made available at the dining halls, including green-ware cups that are made from corn starch,<br />

compostable to-go containers, and compostable trash bags.<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

53%<br />

S<br />

47%<br />

56<br />

58<br />

18<br />

12<br />

0<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Lafayette <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

99<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong> is dedicated to student involvement in environmental programs that address climate change, biodiversity, and green<br />

purchasing. “Environmental State of the <strong>College</strong>,” prepared as part of a senior seminar, discusses Macalester’s successes and failures for ten<br />

different sustainability topics and then provides recommendations based on best practices at other institutions. The discussion of best practices at<br />

peer institutions seems to be the most effective component of the report. Students are encouraged to get involved with the community through<br />

volunteering in community development and environmental education. There is no information on human rights of the employees. Macalester<br />

<strong>College</strong> reported on Greenreportcard.org several statistics that were not on its website. First, that 60% of the college uses "green seal" cleaning<br />

products. Second, that in 2007, its GHG emissions reached 19,350 metric tons of CO2, 10.33 metric tons of CO2 per student. Finally, Macalester<br />

should include its Electronics Recycling Program that accepts batteries, cell phones, computers, light bulbs, and printer cartridges.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

65%<br />

S<br />

35%<br />

71<br />

50<br />

30<br />

5<br />

12<br />

2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 5 14 36 Needs improvement<br />

Management 15 63 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

100<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

The Environmental Council at Middlebury <strong>College</strong> is dedicated to environmental sustainability, and many student programs are involved in habitat<br />

and energy conservation. Through lunch seminars with lectures about energy conservation, the administration, the student body, and community<br />

are educated in pressing environmental issues. Twenty percent of the college’s total waste is composted and dining halls purchase local food and<br />

recycle the waste at composting sites, later used as fertilizer. The Franklin Environmental Center is LEED platinum certified and is a sustainable and<br />

completely green building. <strong>College</strong> vehicles run on biodiesel and Zipcars are available to students. Middlebury’s efforts for a sustainable and low<br />

energy consumption campus are very effective. The code of conduct and human rights information is limited. Middlebury reported on<br />

Greenreportcard.org their greenhouse gas emissions in metric tons of carbon dioxide: 2006, 28,310, 2007, 27,787, and 2008, 28,742.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

59%<br />

S<br />

41%<br />

62<br />

50<br />

17<br />

7<br />

10 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Middlebury <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 6 63 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 7 21 33 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

101<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong><br />

Mount Holyoke <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Mount Holyoke’s mission statement mentions educating the college community about ecological responsibility that is both locally and globally<br />

focused, looking at environmental justice as not only pertaining to the students, but as to each person, place, and living system. There is a new<br />

program to minimize energy consumption. Within this program students will pledge to enable energy saving features on their computers. The school<br />

purchased “green energy” to run all student computers for a year. The school also extends edge to faculty and staff. This program also expands into<br />

other energy saving techniques broadening their focus to a larger community. There is also a lot of advice on recycling, but all presented in a fairly<br />

disorganized way. The use of fertilizer is mentioned, but only to compare the difference between organic compost and organic fertilizer treatments.<br />

There is information on manure use, and soil runoff for the Stony Broke land use in 1985, but nothing more recent or specific.<br />

Bianca Garcia<br />

Daria Dulan<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

74%<br />

S<br />

26%<br />

82<br />

50<br />

40<br />

7<br />

8 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Mount Holyoke<br />

<strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 7 57 Good<br />

Energy 9 14 64 Good<br />

Management 13 63 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 10 14 71 Good<br />

Waste 4 28 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

102<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report 2009 Web Pages<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong> provides a campus climate that is willing to discuss, create, and implement sustainability and sustainable practices. Oberlin has<br />

made it clear that they are dedicated to sustainability not only in ideology but in ways that run deeper, through the school’s administration, student<br />

involvement, building planning and academic offerings. For students there are a number of resources available to be active in maintaining green<br />

practices on campus, such as volunteering on George Jones Farm and Nature Preserve on Oberlin’s campus, from which fresh fruits and vegetables<br />

are used in the dining hall’s Farm to Fork program. This great program budgets a significant percentage of dining hall purchases for local foods that<br />

students can enjoy. Another option for students is the Green EDGE Fund, which provides funding for environmentally conscious and motivated<br />

projects proposed by Oberlin students. This program offers two kinds of funds; an efficiency loan, which is paid back not with money but rather by<br />

the monetary savings provided by the project and a sustainability grant, which requires no payback at all. Students are also offered housing with<br />

sustainable themes as well as the student-run Oberlin Student Cooperative Association, which provides cooperative student housing and dining.<br />

The administration also provides the students with a commitment to have all new buildings on campus align with the U.S. Green Building Council’s<br />

Leadership in Environmental Design (LEED) silver standard. This will add to the preexisting sustainable buildings and systems on the campus, such<br />

as the Living Machine Wastewater Treatment System, and the Adam Joseph Lewis Center for Environmental Studies. Oberlin has made it clear that<br />

it is dedicated to sustainability not only in ideology, but in ways that run deeper, through the school’s administration, student involvement, building<br />

planning and academic offerings.<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

64%<br />

S<br />

36%<br />

79<br />

32<br />

36<br />

17<br />

5<br />

11<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Oberlin <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 7 14 50 Good<br />

Management 10 63 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 8 21 38 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 4 28 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 15 35 43 Needs improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

103<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

104<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D-<br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Overall, Occidental <strong>College</strong> still has a way to go in regards to sustainability. The good practices that the school has implemented include good<br />

administration, food, recycling, and green building policy. Unfortunately this does not make up for the lack of information provided for public<br />

consumption. I would recommend that Occidental <strong>College</strong> invest in creating a environmental and sustainability faculty or staff post. And also to<br />

make the information that it does have readily available by posting it on its website.<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

80%<br />

S<br />

20%<br />

15<br />

5<br />

2<br />

0 0<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Occidental <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 8 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 6 50 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 2 35 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

105<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong> has many web pages detailing various sustainability issues and initiatives, plus a student-generated sustainability audit with a<br />

considerable amount of background information, but quantitative data for most topics were lacking.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

71%<br />

S<br />

29%<br />

76<br />

36<br />

18<br />

5<br />

6 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Pitzer <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 8 63 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 1 77 1 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

106<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong> has a Sustainability Integration Office staffed by a full time director, and, using a consulting engineering firm, did an extraordinarily<br />

detailed campus sustainability audit in 2008. The <strong>College</strong> has subsequently produced a GHG inventory report, a climate action plan, and a relatively<br />

brief but highly informative 2008-2009 sustainability annual report, along with a variety of hyperlinked web pages, all of which were available on the<br />

<strong>College</strong> website in autumn, 2009, when this analysis was done. We analyzed over 1000 pages of material from the Pomona <strong>College</strong> website,<br />

including the aforementioned reports plus a large number of hyperlinked web pages, and were impressed with the level of organization, number of<br />

initiatives, and general professional approach to making the campus as sustainable as possible. The lack of materials scored by the PSI in its social<br />

section was largely responsible for Pomona’s low ranking.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

76%<br />

S<br />

24%<br />

91<br />

36<br />

28<br />

4<br />

10 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Pomona <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 8 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 11 14 79 Excellent<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Water 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

107<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Reed <strong>College</strong> 2009 Susttainability Report<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong> is committed to creating a sustainable campus and to raising awareness about environmental issues. Reed promotes action on<br />

campus that positively affects the community, city, and the whole world. Reed implements these initiatives with classes, lectures, committees,<br />

programs, and more specifically targeted at being more sustainability and increasing awareness. Reed defines sustainability as meeting the<br />

resource needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Reed <strong>College</strong> has a Sustainability<br />

Committee that specifically focuses on enforcing the sustainability policies and programs. Some of the clubs that are working on sustainability<br />

issues are the Homestead House(Farm House), The Student Senate, Greenboard, Green Computing Task Force, Green Science Project, Reed<br />

Canyon, Reed Bike Co-op, Reed Transportation Committee, and Food Services. Reed has also adopted certain practices that led to the conservation<br />

of energy and reduction of waste such as Dorm Challenges, increase of green transportation, new green buildings, and better waste management.<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong> is making numerous strides at creating a more sustainable community. These strides are tangible and noticeable and cause a shift in<br />

college life for the better.<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

61%<br />

S<br />

39%<br />

88<br />

65<br />

15<br />

16<br />

0<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Reed <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 5 8 63 Good<br />

Policy 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 21 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 21 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 7 10 70 Good<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 7 42 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

108<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Richmond University<br />

Richmond University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Richmond University has been very vocal about its commitment to sustainability, signing both the Presidents Climate Commitment and the Talloires<br />

Declaration. Beyond simply talking about sustainability, the university has taken action to promote the sustainability of its campus. In 2003, the<br />

university built its first LEED certified building and in the last few years all new buildings have been LEED certified, while all major renovations have<br />

focused on sustainable design strategies. In keeping with these sustainable design strategies, the University has made a significant investment in<br />

reducing its power and water consumption, installing new more efficient equipment over the last several years. Indeed in almost every area<br />

imaginable, from transportation to dining, Richmond has several sustainability initiatives in place with more on the way. The sheer number of<br />

sustainability initiatives at Richmond is impressive, however it is hard to judge how effective these initiative are because the university publishes<br />

very little quantitative data on its website. The data that can be found rarely have a frame of reference making it impossible to tell how much of a<br />

difference the initiatives are making. As a result there is a possibility that Richmond is doing a better job making its campus sustainable than is<br />

indicated by our analysis, because the lack of data available has made it difficult to judge the true impact of many of Richmond’s initiatives.<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

70%<br />

S<br />

30%<br />

56<br />

28<br />

13<br />

2<br />

3 4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Richmond University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 63 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 10 60 Good<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 3 35 9 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

109<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong> has a main web page on sustainability efforts touching on some of the topics considered by the PSI, and a few linked pages with<br />

additional detail, but most topics remain unaddressed and there are no quantitative data presented at all.<br />

J. Emil Morhardt<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

0%<br />

38<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

100%<br />

6<br />

0 0 0 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 6 67 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

110<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Sewanee--University of the South<br />

Sewanee <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Sewanee had a clear environmental statement and policy as well as information on impediments and challenges. The historical report of Sewanee<br />

<strong>College</strong> was interesting and helpful in understanding the progression of the college’s environmental policy. In the final appendix of the<br />

environmental policy, the college is taking productive steps toward a more environmentally responsible campus and the students are active in<br />

employing an environmentally responsible president. The internal competition between the dorms is a beneficial idea to encourage better<br />

environmental living practices. Sewanee has been received awards for its community development and ample volunteer and student activism, and<br />

has developed an organic garden and organic beef purchasing. There was thorough information on energy and renewable energy use. Water<br />

usage and wastewater information was available and indicated improvement but the data available were too old. Sewanee <strong>College</strong> produced no<br />

information on land use, pesticide use, green material used, or fertilizer use. Greenhouse gas emissions of any kind were not reported. There was<br />

no information on the endowment, environmental fines or expenses or investment practices. However, the information produced for the endowment<br />

and expenses on greenreportcard.org was extensive and if that was made public, it would imporve Sewanee's score. Sewanee has no concrete<br />

numerical goals for the future, with the exception of the energy produced, and was limited information on its recycling practices. Hazardous waste<br />

released and produced was not reported, nor was there any data on environmental violations, accident rates, or health and safety citations. Human<br />

rights information is lacking, only a little information about the sexual harassment and equal opportunity policy and no information on lost workday<br />

case rate.<br />

Marissa L. Garvin<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

70%<br />

S<br />

30%<br />

59<br />

17<br />

5 8 12<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Sewanee--University<br />

of the South<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 7 10 70 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 6 83 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 8 14 57 Good<br />

Management 2 63 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 4 28 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 1 77 1 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

111<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Quantitative Social 2 42 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

112<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong> has made great leaps in becoming a highly environmental and socially responsible campus. Though it has not signed onto the<br />

Presidents’ Climate Commitment, it has adopted its own similar commitment involving reducing greenhouse gas emissions by a set target date. The<br />

college currently has numerous programs in place to meet these targets and shrink its carbon footprint. A unique program in place at Skidmore is its<br />

Eco-Reps program, involving students from each residence hall acting as sustainability advisors to the other students and promoting<br />

environmentally friendly habits and events. On Skidmore’s sustainability website, students can read about the different habits they can adopt to live<br />

a more environmentally responsible life. Events throughout the year, including “Skidmore Unplugged”, a residence hall competition to achieve the<br />

highest energy savings, also encourage student involvement and promote environmental awareness. The college is also committed to its North<br />

Woods program that aims to preserve the natural ecosystem for study and recreational purposes. Instead of developing this land, Skidmore pledges<br />

to protect 200 acres through 2050. However, the Skidmore <strong>College</strong> web pages fail to include any quantitative data on energy use, water use, or<br />

waste disposed of and recycled. To improve its score, more past and current data need to be analyzed and published on the college’s web pages.<br />

While Skidmore is planning to enact more sustainability initiatives, more work needs to be done to set specific goals and targets.<br />

Joseph Bryan Swartley<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

50%<br />

S<br />

50%<br />

74<br />

64<br />

19<br />

16 15<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Skidmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 10 63 16 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 16 35 46 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

113<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C+<br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Smith <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Smith <strong>College</strong> has several student-run programs to reduce its contribution to global warming and water usage. Smith has also implemented an<br />

Energy Star power management program to increase campus green purchasing. From the Million Monitor Drive to purchasing paper towels and<br />

toilet paper made from recycled products, Smith is clearly environmentally conscious. Smith has many green building projects around the campus;<br />

for example, the Ada Housing Project will have a dorm with solar panels on it. Through reduction of power plant emissions, the Gymnasium Lighting<br />

Project, and electric saving, Smith plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the college by 80% by 2050. The Green Team is a sustainability<br />

committee responsible for the environmental management at the college; they work on issues including energy usage, water consumption, and CO2<br />

emission levels. The Agriculture Action Committee incorporates green food purchasing in the dining halls and composting programs that use waste<br />

food to fertilize land. Smith <strong>College</strong> has many transportation opportunities for the students to decrease traffic and pollution including a fleet of<br />

Zipcars on campus, and community development and education are integrated into environmental management at Smith <strong>College</strong>. Smith has built a<br />

community garden, which is available to and tended by students and the community. Smith <strong>College</strong> is one of the few colleges that engages in a<br />

discussion of the value of third party auditing and/or validation and buildings and energy saving changes are reviewed by a third party. Smith<br />

<strong>College</strong> has limited information about codes of conduct and anti-corruption practices but it briefly mentions intolerance of forced labor, illegal child<br />

labor, and sexual harassment.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

47%<br />

S<br />

53%<br />

56<br />

53<br />

13<br />

14<br />

0<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Smith <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 6 10 60 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 6 63 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 7 7 100 Excellent<br />

Qualitative Social 13 35 37 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

114<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

St. Olaf is keenly aware of its environmental responsibility and has acted accordingly. The college has restored large sections of the campus to its<br />

natural state and minimized the environmental impact of marinating the campus grounds by using less fertilizer and letting the grass grow longer. St.<br />

Olaf has made significant efforts to minimize both its carbon footprint, installing a utility grade wind turbine in addition to implementing policies to<br />

reduce power consumption. Even the dining service has gotten involved: all food waste is composted and some of the food found in the dinning halls<br />

comes from an organic garden maintained by the students. There is strong student involvement in environmental activities at St. Olaf. This student<br />

activism is supported by St. Olaf’s strong Environmental Studies program. The program benefits from both a strong curriculum and a fantastic<br />

natural laboratory in the form of St Olaf’s natural lands. The college clearly has made significant strides in its efforts to be environmentally<br />

conscious on both and administrative and student level. However, St. Olaf has not published very much of the quantitative data for their<br />

environmental programs which could well explain any underachievement indicated by this report.<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

60%<br />

S<br />

40%<br />

65<br />

53<br />

33<br />

15 11<br />

0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

St. Olaf <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 7 10 70 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 5 14 36 Needs improvement<br />

Management 13 63 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 6 21 29 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 5 28 18 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 5 10 50 Good<br />

Vision 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 14 77 18 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 7 35 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

115<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report 2009<br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong> is taking major steps to engage in green practices and promote a sustainable community and culture. It has implemented<br />

energy efficient heating and cooling devices and gets 40% of its energy from wind power. The administration has also made a commitment to LEED<br />

building standards, and has installed vegetated roofs atop residence halls to provide energy efficient insulation. The dining hall purchases local and<br />

organic food and provides Swarthmore students with green and healthy options when eating. In addition, pre-consumer food waste is composted<br />

for use in the on campus student garden and excess food is donated to a local charity City Team Ministries. Students at Swarthmore are also<br />

working toward green living. There is the student initiated group, Earthlust, which discusses and takes action on environmental issues through a<br />

series of events and an active website that promotes campus sustainability. Earthlust sponsors the student-run Green Advisors program that works<br />

to encourage students to engage in green practice in the residence halls and beyond.<br />

Tigist Kassahun<br />

Timothy M. Fine<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

56%<br />

S<br />

44%<br />

44<br />

39<br />

17<br />

13<br />

0<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 63 6 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

116<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C-<br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong> has made it a goal to put sustainability at the forefront of its endeavors. The <strong>College</strong> has infused sustainability efforts throughout<br />

college life and communities. Not only has there been discussion around the issue of sustainability, but there have been many initiatives and actions<br />

implemented to reach this goal. The Trinity <strong>College</strong> Mission Statement says that the <strong>College</strong> will strive to produce students, faculty, and staff who<br />

are environmentally literate citizens of the Earth and whose actions adhere to principles of environmental stewardship through commitment to<br />

sustainable practices its daily decision-making processes and support of resource conservation, reduction of waste and pollution, recycling,<br />

minimizing our environmental footprint, and investing in the local community. Trinity has taken initiatives to reduce consumption of natural<br />

resources including food, energy, and water, to establish and enforce environmentally sustainable practices and procedures in designing,<br />

constructing, and maintaining buildings and grounds, to reduce the use of toxic substances, to promote the use of renewable, reusable, recyclable,<br />

and recycled materials, and to reduce waste and increase recycling. Trinity also promotes health and safety on campus and in the surrounding<br />

community. Overall Trinity <strong>College</strong> is doing a great job with securing a sustainable community and environmentally friendly campus life.<br />

Joseph Bryan Swartley<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

48%<br />

S<br />

52%<br />

76<br />

59<br />

1 0<br />

0 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Trinity <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 8 8 100 Excellent<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 12 50 Good<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 1 105 1 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 7 10 70 Good<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 10 20 50 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

117<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Union <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

The environmental and social sustainability information provided on Union <strong>College</strong>’s website is extremely vague. While the college broadly<br />

discusses its commitment to green initiatives, environmental education, and community involvement, it does not provide sufficient quantitative data<br />

to back up its claims. For example, the college reports that it purchases 15% renewable energy per year and donates significant funds to the local<br />

community, but no dates or specific amounts are provided. The college could easily improve its grade in the future by reporting more substantial<br />

quantitative information.<br />

Gracie Beck<br />

Bukola Jimoh<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

78%<br />

S<br />

22%<br />

74<br />

17<br />

2<br />

11 7 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Union <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 1 2 50 Good<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 8 10 80 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Management 9 63 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

118<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

United States Military Academy<br />

US Military Academy 2009 Web Pages<br />

The USMA, unlike most colleges and universities, has adopted the ISO 14001 environmental management standard. The website makes clear<br />

statements about USMA’s visions for the Academy on the major environmental problems impacting the world, but, even though the Academy must<br />

collect the data under ISO 14001 standard, the website contains only a few outdated numbers for waste and recycled material, and very little on<br />

energy use or water use and recycling. Lacking also is information about the social policies at the Academy.<br />

Marissa L. Garvin<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

69%<br />

S<br />

31%<br />

47<br />

21<br />

17<br />

9<br />

2<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

United States<br />

Military Academy<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 8 38 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Management 5 63 8 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 0 21 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 4 14 29 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 8 28 29 Needs improvement<br />

Water 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 1 10 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 1 6 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 1 10 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 6 35 17 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

119<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

D<br />

United States Naval Academy<br />

United States Naval Academy 2009 Web Pages<br />

The United States Naval Academy’ environmental policy focuses largely on complying with the Federal, State, and local environmental regulations,<br />

as well as the Navy regulations. In order to meet regulations, the Naval Academy has various programs to deal with issues including, but not limited<br />

to water, air, hazardous waste, recycling, and pollution prevention. Though it has not reported failing to meet these regulations, the Naval Academy<br />

has not detailed any statistical improvements that it has made over the years. Additionally, though some green programs are listed, detailed<br />

description and quantitative data are not available, making it difficult to know how well the Naval Academy compares to its peer institutions.<br />

Though its grade in this publication may be lower than most other colleges, it is safe to assume that the Naval Academy has met, if not exceeded,<br />

Federal standards and is mindful of its impact on the environment.<br />

Rishabh Rajen Parekh<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

14 %<br />

S<br />

86%<br />

22<br />

9<br />

9<br />

4<br />

0 0<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

United States Naval<br />

Academy<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 8 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 1 10 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 0 6 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 63 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 0 21 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 0 28 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 1 4 25 Needs improvement<br />

Management 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 2 77 3 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 9 35 26 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

120<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong> has a Committee focused on sustainability and committed to making the college a “greener place.” Vassar is extremely focused on<br />

creating greener buildings because it is one of the most proactive things that it can do to reduce its energy consumption. Students have taken a<br />

major role in many of the environmental projects on campus, including switching from incandescent light bulbs to compact fluorescent ones. Many<br />

of the vehicles on campus use bio-diesel fuel and the use of pesticide and herbicide on campus has been dramatically reduced. The <strong>College</strong> has<br />

also focused on waste reduction; the wastes from construction and from food leftovers are both being recycled. Overall, the sustainability<br />

committee is continuing to work on instituting a sustainability policy that would cover issues impacting most aspects of the school, and would cover<br />

recycling, purchasing, building and construction, composting, education, energy consumption, and an increase in the patronage of local food<br />

vendors. The president provides strong leadership to prioritize issues around sustainability.<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

70%<br />

S<br />

30%<br />

68<br />

69<br />

31<br />

0<br />

0 2<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Vassar <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 8 50 Good<br />

Policy 5 10 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Management 8 63 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 4 21 19 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 5 28 18 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

Management 6 10 60 Good<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 7 10 70 Good<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 1 77 1 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 0 35 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

121<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Washington and Lee University<br />

Washington and Lee University 2009 Web Pages<br />

Washington and Lee University has shown a strong commitment to improving its sustainability practices in recent years. The administration has<br />

signed onto the Talloires Declaration, the President’s Climate Commitment, and the Virginia Environmental Excellence Program at an entry (E2) level.<br />

The University has also had an Environmental Audit and two greenhouse gas audits, a sign it is determined to find the areas in which it can improve.<br />

With policies that dictate that all future buildings be built to LEED certified standards and that only Energy Star rated appliances be purchased, the<br />

University has implemented the policies that will ensure environmental friendliness in the future. At the present, the University has already started to<br />

install motion sensor lights and low-flow water taps among other energy conservation devices and regulations, such as temperature regulation on<br />

heating and cooling systems. Washington and Lee has taken part in RecycleMania and is committed not only to recycling waste products, but also<br />

to purchasing recycled goods and composting. Steps have also been taken toward using more organic foods in the dining halls; a Campus Garden<br />

was started in 2008 to supply food directly to the dining hall, supplemented by outside purchasing of organic foods when it is feasible. Support for<br />

environmentally friendly programs extends past just the administration and has also taken root in the Washington and Lee student body. The<br />

Environmental Law Society raises public awareness of the law’s impact on the environment; the Student Environmental Action League promotes<br />

environmental issues throughout the college and surrounding community; and the Blue Bike Program encourages students to use bikes rather than<br />

cars. In addition to practical experience gained from these programs, students can also take advantage of the University’s interdisciplinary<br />

environmental studies program.<br />

Rishabh Rajen Parekh<br />

Marcia Marcella McWilliams<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

47%<br />

S<br />

53%<br />

50<br />

41<br />

16<br />

15<br />

0<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Washington and Lee<br />

University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 0 14 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 63 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 6 14 43 Needs improvement<br />

Waste 3 28 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 4 77 5 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 11 35 31 Needs improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

122<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

123<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B<br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

From its Environmental Studies major to the organization WEED (Wellesley Energy and Environmental Defense), Wellesley <strong>College</strong> aims to make<br />

sustainability and human impact on the globe a primary concern in its curriculum and informal activities. It has successfully instituted Green Corps,<br />

consultants on campus available to aid students “in implementing change as appropriate and feasible within departments on a range of issues<br />

including energy conservation, recycling, minimal-waste event planning, and purchasing of ‘green’ products and supplies. Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

extends its participation outside of campus into RecycleMania, a nationwide recycling competition among college students. Although the school<br />

received a B- on its Green Report Card, Wellesley <strong>College</strong> does a good job in showcasing what it is doing on its website. Images of the campus are<br />

paired with information on land use and renovation. The <strong>College</strong> provides significant amounts of data on what resources and materials have been<br />

eliminated or used to better its overall sustainability. Lastly, along with other colleges committed to environmental justice, Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

contracted with food service provider, Sodexo to provide better sustainability practices in its dining halls. It also has committed itself to reach out to<br />

local vendors for green products, expand water conservation efforts, continue recycling efforts, and use more “green materials.”<br />

Rishabh Rajen Parekh<br />

Elizabeth Perez<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

64%<br />

S<br />

36%<br />

53<br />

50<br />

39<br />

15<br />

9<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Wellesley <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 10 20 Needs substantial improvement<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 15 63 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 10 21 48 Needs improvement<br />

Recycling 10 14 71 Good<br />

Waste 1 28 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 5 7 71 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 2 6 33 Needs improvement<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 8 77 10 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 1 42 2 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

124<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

B-<br />

Wesleyan University<br />

Wesleyan University 2008 Sustainability Report and 2009 Web Pages<br />

Wesleyan University’s web pages and “Green Report” published in May of 2008 give a comprehensive overview of the college’s efforts to achieve<br />

greater on-campus sustainability, and over the past few years, Wesleyan has taken a number of actions to improve its environmental record.<br />

Michael Roth, the president of the university, “enthusiastically” agreed to sign the American <strong>College</strong> and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment<br />

and is dedicated to meeting the University targets of greenhouse gas reduction. The campus’ Environmental Organizers’ Network (EON) takes<br />

responsibility for student initiatives on campus, including taking waste from the dining halls and bringing it to the compost tubs at the Long Lane<br />

Farm, significantly reducing the amount of waste headed for the landfill. Wesleyan also plans to install 200-kW of solar panels on the Freeman<br />

Athletic Center roof and other roofs around campus, as well as improving energy efficiency. Furthermore, the <strong>College</strong>’s web pages include<br />

numerous recommendations for students to reduce their carbon footprint and waste, from not buying bottled water to driving more efficiently. To<br />

improve its environmental and social sustainability rating in our analysis, Wesleyan needs to include more quantitative data that show how the<br />

<strong>College</strong>’s current and past initiatives are working to reduce energy use, water consumption, and waste disposal.<br />

Joseph Bryan Swartley<br />

Jaleesa D. Parks<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

54%<br />

S<br />

46%<br />

79<br />

72<br />

20<br />

13<br />

2<br />

7<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

W esleyan University<br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 3 7 43 Needs improvement<br />

Energy 2 14 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 8 63 13 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 5 21 24 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 1 14 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 3 28 11 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 1 7 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 2 4 50 Good<br />

Management 7 10 70 Good<br />

Policy 4 6 67 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 10 10 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 3 77 4 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

125<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

C<br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong> is clearly dedicated to campus environmental awareness. Through its Campus Climate Challenge, it encourages students to<br />

reduce their energy usage. In 2008, the Jewett Solar Project built wind generators on farm land, and created 23 kW photovoltaic arrays on flat<br />

roofs. This college also has a wind turbine to offset carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use. Whitman has a Conservation Committee that<br />

advises the college on environmental issues, provides contact information for various parts of the management structure, and purchases only<br />

Energy Star electric equipment. In 2007, Whitman bought 880 cases of 100% recycled paper. Another student-run organization called the Campus<br />

Greens creates awareness by holding educational events for students. The dining halls compost 20-30 gallons of scraps daily into their organic<br />

garden. By offering Valley Transit and Grapeline, Whitman reduces pollution through mass transit options. The Give 20 Challenge, Adopt-A-<br />

Grandparent, Mentor, and Storytime clubs encourage student and employee volunteerism and education in the community, but there is little<br />

information about occupational health and safety, or codes of conduct and other social responsibility information.<br />

Jacyln T. D'Arcy<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

59<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

60%<br />

S<br />

40%<br />

36<br />

15<br />

9<br />

0<br />

4<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

Whitman <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 0 2 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 8 25 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 7 10 70 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Energy 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 5 63 8 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Materials usage 3 21 14 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Recycling 3 14 21 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Waste 2 28 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Water 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 4 10 40 Needs improvement<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 1 2 50 Good<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 3 10 30 Needs improvement<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 0 77 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 7 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 12 35 34 Needs improvement<br />

Quantitative Social 0 42 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

126<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Roberts Environmental Center<br />

A+<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong><br />

Williams <strong>College</strong> 2009 Web Pages<br />

Williams <strong>College</strong> has successfully deferred part of its energy costs with the $92,670 grant used for renewable energy. The live feed on the Williams<br />

website of the energy consumption in conjunction with diagrams and explanatory pictures was a useful resource in demonstrating Williams’<br />

commitment to decreased energy consumption. The data show that Williams’ energy costs have declined, and there was overall improvement in<br />

reducing greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide. There was ample reporting on waste production and recycling but not much<br />

information on how that wastewater was recycled. The use of graphs and pie charts was helpful in getting a visual representation of William’s<br />

environmental progress. There was abundant information on social initiatives taken to improve community development and education and<br />

environmental awareness, but a lack of data on human rights measures. There was no discussion nor were there any initiatives to address age,<br />

gender, or racial/ethnic distribution in the workforce and Williams failed to indicate the total number of employee incidents, injuries, or annual<br />

turnover rate. Information on the health and safety citations or fines was unavailable. There was only limited information on pesticide, fertilizer, and<br />

land use. The total amount of hazardous waste released was unreported. The water usage data used were outdated. There was no information on<br />

Williams’ investment and shareholder practice, nor any information about how Williams chose its environmental procedures, initiatives, or<br />

investment priorities. A total of $291,579.92 was spent on purchasing food locally. This was reported to greenreportcard.org but is not currently listed<br />

on the Williams <strong>College</strong> website.<br />

Quentin Jones<br />

Marissa L. Garvin<br />

E=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total<br />

Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance<br />

Comparison with sector averages<br />

Source of points<br />

Distribution of points<br />

E<br />

ESA<br />

S<br />

SSA<br />

0 25 50 75<br />

E<br />

69%<br />

S<br />

31%<br />

88<br />

59<br />

39<br />

20<br />

24<br />

13<br />

EI ER EP SI SR SP<br />

W illiams <strong>College</strong><br />

Environmental Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 3 4 75 Excellent<br />

<strong>College</strong> Sector Specific Indicator 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

Management 6 8 75 Excellent<br />

Policy 9 10 90 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 6 6 100 Excellent<br />

Vision 4 4 100 Excellent<br />

Environmental Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Emissions to air 5 7 71 Good<br />

Energy 8 14 57 Good<br />

Management 32 63 51 Good<br />

Materials usage 11 21 52 Good<br />

Recycling 7 14 50 Good<br />

Waste 7 28 25 Needs improvement<br />

Water 4 7 57 Good<br />

Social Intent<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Accountability 0 4 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 0 10 0 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Policy 3 6 50 Good<br />

Social Demographic 2 2 100 Excellent<br />

The <strong>College</strong> Sustainability Report Card Criteria 7 10 70 Good<br />

Vision 2 4 50 Good<br />

Social Reporting<br />

Question Category Score Max Score % General Comment<br />

Human Rights 9 77 12 Needs substantial improvement<br />

Management 2 7 29 Needs improvement<br />

Qualitative Social 21 35 60 Good<br />

Quantitative Social 3 42 7 Needs substantial improvement<br />

www.roberts.cmc.edu<br />

127<br />

2010 Sustainability Reporting of the Top 50 Liberal Arts <strong>College</strong>s


<strong>Amherst</strong> <strong>College</strong>, <strong>Bard</strong> <strong>College</strong>, <strong>Barnard</strong> <strong>College</strong>,<br />

<strong>Bates</strong> <strong>College</strong>, Bowdoin <strong>College</strong>, Bryn Mawr<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Bucknell University, Carleton <strong>College</strong>,<br />

Centre <strong>College</strong>, Colby <strong>College</strong>, Colgate<br />

University, <strong>College</strong> of the Holy Cross, Colorado<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Connecticut <strong>College</strong>, Davidson <strong>College</strong>,<br />

DePauw University, Dickinson <strong>College</strong>, Franklin<br />

and Marshall <strong>College</strong>, Furman University,<br />

Gettysburg <strong>College</strong>, Grinnell <strong>College</strong>, Hamilton<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong>, Haverford<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Kenyon <strong>College</strong>, Lafayette <strong>College</strong>,<br />

Macalester <strong>College</strong>, Middlebury <strong>College</strong>, Mount<br />

Holyoke <strong>College</strong>, Oberlin <strong>College</strong>, Occidental<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Pitzer <strong>College</strong>, Pomona <strong>College</strong>, Reed<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Richmond University, Scripps <strong>College</strong>,<br />

Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong><br />

Sewanee--University of the South, Skidmore<br />

Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong>, a member of the Claremont <strong>College</strong>s, is a highly selective, independent, coeducational, residential,<br />

undergraduate liberal arts college with a curricular emphasis on economics, government, and public affairs.<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Smith <strong>College</strong>, St. Olaf <strong>College</strong>,<br />

The Claremont <strong>College</strong>s<br />

The Claremont <strong>College</strong>s form a consortium of five undergraduate liberal arts colleges and two graduate institutions based on the<br />

Swarthmore <strong>College</strong>, Trinity <strong>College</strong>, Union<br />

Oxford/Cambridge model. The consortium offers students diverse opportunities and resources typically found only at much larger<br />

universities. The consortium members include Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong>, Harvey Mudd <strong>College</strong>, Pitzer <strong>College</strong>, Pomona <strong>College</strong>,<br />

Scripps <strong>College</strong>, Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences, and the Claremont Graduate University—which includes the<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Peter F. Drucker United and Masatoshi Ito Graduate States School of Management. Military Academy, United<br />

Contact Information<br />

States Naval Academy, Vassar <strong>College</strong>,<br />

Dr. J. Emil Morhardt, Director, Roberts Environmental Center, Claremont McKenna <strong>College</strong>, 925 N. Mills Avenue, Claremont, CA<br />

91711-5916, USA, Phone: 909-621-8190, Fax: 909-607-1185, email: emorhardt@cmc.edu<br />

Washington and Lee University, Wellesley<br />

<strong>College</strong>, Wesleyan University, Whitman <strong>College</strong>,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!