15.06.2014 Views

Land Supply Analysis - Rossendale Borough Council

Land Supply Analysis - Rossendale Borough Council

Land Supply Analysis - Rossendale Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Critique of housing land supply in <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

April 2013<br />

Core Strategy<br />

The Core Strategy was adopted on the 8 November, 2011 and establishes policy for the<br />

period 2011 to 2026.<br />

Policy 2: Meeting <strong>Rossendale</strong>’s Housing Requirement<br />

The net housing requirement for the period 2011-2026, will be achieved through:<br />

1. Providing at least 3700 net additional dwellings over the plan period 2011-2026<br />

equating to 247 dwellings per year<br />

2. Allocating greenfield and previously developed land to meet the requirement for<br />

the period 2011-2026 to meet identified type, size and tenure needs; including<br />

indicative phasing where appropriate<br />

3. Delivering an overall amount of 65% of all new dwellings on previously developed<br />

land (PDL) across the <strong>Borough</strong>. Rawtenstall will have a lower PDL figure, with<br />

substantially higher levels in Bacup, Haslingden and Whitworth<br />

4. Supporting the reuse and conversion of appropriate buildings for housing<br />

5. Encouraging higher density developments (50+ dwellings per hectare) in<br />

sustainable locations, such as within and adjacent to Rawtenstall, Bacup,<br />

Haslingden and Whitworth and where well served by public transport, with a<br />

minimum density of 30dph across the <strong>Borough</strong><br />

6. Safeguarding the character of established residential areas from over-intensive<br />

and inappropriate new development; and<br />

7. Prioritising the development of previously developed land. However,<br />

development of un-allocated greenfield land will be permitted where:<br />

i. It is for 100% affordable and/or supported housing schemes; or<br />

ii. It forms a minor part (up to 15% of the overall site size) of a larger mixed use scheme or a<br />

major housing proposal (10+ dwellings) on previously developed land or<br />

iii. It delivers a significant social, economic, or environmental benefit, or<br />

iv. The application is for a barn conversion and it can be demonstrated that the<br />

site has been marketed for economic uses for 12 months, to the satisfaction of the<br />

<strong>Council</strong>, and is not viable for these purposes<br />

1


The <strong>Council</strong>’s Annual Monitoring statements 20010/11 and 2011/12<br />

The monitoring statements give the following figures for housing completions in<br />

recent years:-<br />

2005/6 206<br />

2006/7 114<br />

2007/8 222<br />

2008/9 54<br />

2009/10 173<br />

2010/11 74<br />

2011/12 119<br />

Thus, an annual target of 247 dwellings per year is very challenging and a high supply of<br />

deliverable sites will be required. Such a figure has never been attained over the past 7<br />

years and the average completion rate, at 137, is more than a hundred per year below the<br />

target figure. Moreover the NPPF advocates that where there is evidence of<br />

underperformance the 5 year supply should be augmented by 20%. That puts the annual<br />

target at 296 and is more than twice the average for the past 7 years.<br />

Calculating the 5 year supply of deliverable housing land in the <strong>Borough</strong><br />

A. The <strong>Council</strong>’s Housing <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> report 2012-2017<br />

This is the latest assessment by the LPA of housing land availability, produced in September<br />

2012 and relating to the period from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2017.<br />

The report includes 2 scenarios. The first takes the average of 247 houses needed per year<br />

and adds 20% for previous underperformance. This gives a 5 year requirement of 1482<br />

dwellings.<br />

Scenario 2 is based on an assumed accelerating housing trajectory over the next 15 years<br />

(though with no evidence that such an accelerator is likely). This gives a figure for the next 5<br />

years of 1447 dwellings.<br />

2


B. Appeal decisions guidance on calculating the 5 year supply<br />

1) Appeal decision. High Peak <strong>Borough</strong> council (APP/H1033/A/11/2159038) 23 August,<br />

2012<br />

In allowing the appeal for, amongst other reasons, a lack of a 5 year supply of deliverable<br />

housing land, the Inspector opined as follows:-<br />

10. The most up-to-date planning policy document, the National Planning Policy<br />

Framework (the Framework), was issued in March 2012. The Framework at 47<br />

requires that local planning authorities should … identify and update annually a<br />

supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide 5 years’ worth of housing<br />

against their housing requirements with an additional buffer of 5% (moved<br />

forward from later in the Plan period) to ensure choice and competition in the<br />

market for land. Footnote 11 to 47 explains that to be considered deliverable,<br />

sites should be available now… and be achievable with a realistic prospect that<br />

housing will be delivered on the site within 5 years …. Footnote 11 states that<br />

sites with planning permission should be considered deliverable until permission<br />

expires, unless there is clear evidence that schemes will not be implemented<br />

within 5 years, for example they will not be viable…. The inclusion of the phrase<br />

until permission expires strongly implies that a site which no longer has – or,<br />

significantly, has not yet received – planning permission for housing is not to be<br />

considered deliverable in the terms of the Framework.<br />

2) Appeal decision. Wincanton (APP/R3325/A/12/2170082) determined on 29 August, 2012<br />

Sites without planning permission<br />

30. The Framework advises that to be considered deliverable, sites should be<br />

available now. Accordingly, sites without planning permission should not be<br />

included in the supply, except as described below. (The “below” relates to windfall sites)<br />

Housing supply in the <strong>Borough</strong> in the light of the above<br />

The LPA’s Housing <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> report 2012-2017 gives the following figures in relation to<br />

the target requirement of 1482 dwellings from 1 April 2012 and for the following 5 years:-<br />

3


Most of the “number of dwellings from specific deliverable sites” either do not have planning<br />

permissions or are in areas where such permissions for housing development are unlikely to<br />

be forthcoming. If this category is omitted then the availability of deliverable housing land is<br />

as follows:-<br />

Sites where a start has been made but 555<br />

where there are outstanding completions<br />

remaining<br />

Sites with planning permissions which will 412<br />

not lapse until 2012 but where no start had<br />

been made<br />

Total 967<br />

Shortfall for next 5 years -515<br />

Percentage shortfall 35%<br />

Years supply at a requirement of 296 3.27 years<br />

dwellings per year<br />

4


More detailed analysis<br />

Data sources<br />

In 2008 the LPA commissioned Roger Tym Assocs. to produce a report into likely available<br />

housing sites in the <strong>Borough</strong> in order to show that there was at least a 5 year supply of<br />

housing land. Possible sites were categorised into three, with category 1 sites being the<br />

most suitable and category 3 sites being the least suitable or least likely to be available<br />

within 5 years. The conclusion was that a 5 year supply could indeed be shown – though<br />

the analysis included very many sites lacking planning permissions and discussions with<br />

land owners was not particularly robust.<br />

That report has been used by the LPA as a “rolling programme” since then to update its data<br />

on housing land availability.<br />

In particular, this supplementary analysis has looked at the following reports published by<br />

the LPA since that time:-<br />

1. The LPA SHLAA report of December, 2010 as this contains details of the individual<br />

sites which the LPA claims provide a 5 year supply of deliverable housing land<br />

2. The “ 5 Year Housing <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> Report 2012-2017” published in September, 2012<br />

3. The LPA’s Site Allocations and Development Management DPD which it is currently<br />

undertaking as it moves towards the production of a new local plan for the borough<br />

4. The LPA’s adopted Core Strategy and its current policies with regard to the release<br />

of land beyond the saved Urban Boundary of the old Local Plan.<br />

Core Strategy policy with regard to the release of sites for development beyond the saved<br />

Urban Boundary<br />

The adopted Core Strategy has “saved” the Urban Boundary as delineated on the previous<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong> District Local Plan which had been adopted in 1996.<br />

The Core Strategy resists most development outside the Urban Boundary in accordance<br />

with its policy 1:-<br />

5


Review of the Urban Boundary and the suitability of new sites for housing<br />

The LPA is currently undertaking a review of possible new sites for inclusion within the<br />

urban Boundary – but as it’s published literature makes clear it may still be two years away<br />

from finalisation:-<br />

The following is taken from the LPA’s website (April 2013)<br />

Lives & <strong>Land</strong>scapes<br />

Local Plan Part 2 - Site Allocations and Development<br />

Management DPD<br />

View pages in this section<br />

Lives & <strong>Land</strong>scapes is the second part of <strong>Rossendale</strong>s Local Plan and will designate land<br />

and buildings for future uses such as housing, parks, shops, schools and parking. It will also<br />

set out what new developments should look like, how they should be constructed as well as<br />

how they should fit in with their surroundings.<br />

Latest News!<br />

Consultation Comments on the Green Belt & Urban Boundary Review<br />

View the comments received on the Green Belt and Urban Boundary Review<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> will assess each comment in turn and will publish a further report in the summer<br />

of 2013 setting out its responses to the submissions made.<br />

What things will be allocated?<br />

All sorts of land uses and facilities will be looked at potentially allocated, for example:<br />

Car Parks Local Nature Reserves All Types & Size of Housing Offices<br />

Shops Industrial Areas Play Grounds Allotments<br />

Sports Pitches Parks Health Centres Schools<br />

Hotels Tourist Attractions Park and Ride Green Belt<br />

Countryside Local Green Spaces Recreation & Leisure Facilities Infrastructure<br />

Will you be looking at the Green Belt and Urban Boundaries?<br />

Yes. The current boundaries were drawn 15+ years ago and things have changed since then.<br />

We need to take a look at them now to make sure that they are accurate as well as make room<br />

for future needs.<br />

7


But, don't panic! We're not planning to radically change the boundaries and we understand<br />

how important the countryside is to local people and the natural environment.<br />

How will it be done?<br />

We plan to prepare the document in a logical sequence to make it as easy and clear to<br />

understand and follow as possible. As such it will be broken down into 3 distinct parts:<br />

1. Green Belt and Urban Boundary Review<br />

2. Allocating <strong>Land</strong> and Buildings<br />

3. Policies for Types of Development and Design & Materials<br />

Doing it this way will allow us to objectively assess sites based upon where the boundaries<br />

should be and then produce policies for those sites once we know what they are going to be<br />

used for.<br />

How long will it take?<br />

It's a detailed document and it will take between 2-3 years before its finished.<br />

It takes this long because we have to look at every site in detail and examine all the pros and<br />

cons - this takes time. We also need time for full public consultation and we also need to<br />

make sure that we satisfy all the relevant legal requirements.<br />

How do I get involved and have my say?<br />

By its nature Lives & <strong>Land</strong>scapes will attract a lot of attention and it is important to us that<br />

you get the opportunity to give us your views. Throughout the process we will actively seek<br />

your comments and give you as much opportunity as possible to tell us your thoughts.<br />

We will do this by:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Establishing a Community Forum for community and voluntary groups which meet at<br />

regular and meaningful points in time before, during and after each stage of<br />

consultation<br />

Arrange public meetings for residents and local businesses who cannot make the<br />

Community Forum or who are not part of a community or voluntary group<br />

Help you to submit comments and understand the process<br />

You can get involved by:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Attending the forums and/or public meetings<br />

Send us your comments by email, post, facebook, twitter etc<br />

Submit sites for us to consider for allocation<br />

Invite us to a meeting to sit down and explain the process and address any concerns<br />

you might have<br />

8


How will the <strong>Council</strong> make sure that people know about it?<br />

We know you care about <strong>Rossendale</strong> and your views are important to us. Therefore we will<br />

publicise Lives & <strong>Land</strong>scapes as best as possible, including:<br />

Newspaper Adverts and<br />

Articals<br />

Community Forums & Word<br />

of Mouth<br />

Posters and Leaflets to Local<br />

Communities<br />

Facebook, Twitter etc Radio (if possible) Public Meetings<br />

Letters and Emails Attending Events<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong> <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

Website<br />

Any other things you or we can think of!<br />

Are the views of developers and land owners more important?<br />

No. It doesn't matter whether you're a developer, landowner, builder, local resident,<br />

community group or a local business, all views are treated equally.<br />

Do you have to own land to put it forward for allocation?<br />

No. Anyone can submit sites for us to consider - you don't have to own it for us to look at it,<br />

we'll sort that bit out.<br />

So, the LPA continues to use the current Urban Boundary to contain most development and<br />

is resistant to housing development outside it. That position is unlikely to change for at least<br />

another two years and any changes at that time are still very uncertain and cannot be relied<br />

upon.<br />

<strong>Analysis</strong> of the LPA’s housing supply data in the light of the above<br />

A. Sites which have been included but which are outside the current Urban Boundary<br />

The LPA’s “5 Year Housing <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> Report 2012-2017“published in September 2012<br />

includes in its provision of a 5 year housing supply a list of sites totalling 1379 dwellings<br />

(Page 13). Most of the sites mentioned have a serial number attached to them and these<br />

can be traced back to the maps as contained in the LPA’s 2010 SHLAA. Others relate to the<br />

on-going review of the Urban Boundary which still has some two years to run.<br />

An analysis of these sites shows that the following would be most unlikely to be granted<br />

planning permission at the present time as they are outside the Urban Boundary and where<br />

9


current Core Strategy policy would be resistant to their release. Housing numbers shown in<br />

red should be discounted on allocation grounds alone<br />

Sites with comments in red are outside the Urban Boundary. Sites in blue are identified as<br />

available in the LPA’s 5 year land supply report but have other major constraints attaching to<br />

them or the number of suggested dwellings is too high.<br />

<strong>Supply</strong> of Specific Deliverable Sites<br />

The table below identifies sites across the <strong>Borough</strong> that are considered to be deliverable<br />

between 1st April 2012 and 31st March 2017, in accordance with the provisions of<br />

paragraph 47 and footnote 11 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) March<br />

2012.<br />

Site ID<br />

(SHLAA)<br />

Location/addres<br />

s<br />

635 / 710 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to<br />

Grane Road and<br />

Holcombe Road,<br />

Haslingden<br />

671 <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

Hospital Site,<br />

Haslingden Road,<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

17 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to<br />

Moorland Rise,<br />

Haslingden<br />

673 <strong>Land</strong> north of<br />

Lime Tree Grove,<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

(Constablee<br />

Development 1)<br />

Albert Mill and<br />

Sunnyside,<br />

Whitworth<br />

<strong>Land</strong> between<br />

Reedsholme and<br />

Short Clough<br />

Reservoir,<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

Comments<br />

No<br />

of<br />

dwg<br />

s<br />

160 L<strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />

Boundary of the District Local Plan.<br />

Site 635. The 2010 SHLAA states<br />

“Downgraded to Category 2 as not<br />

available within 5 years”<br />

139<br />

Site 710. Former gas works site<br />

100 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />

Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />

The 2010 SHLAA states<br />

“Available within 11-15 years<br />

84 Potential access issues, with a<br />

“ransom strip” for access from the<br />

south<br />

75 2012/0558 is an outline approval<br />

for up to 49 dwellings granted on<br />

the<br />

50 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />

Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />

Green field land<br />

10


<strong>Land</strong> adjacent<br />

to A56,<br />

Haslingden<br />

50 Most of this site is very noisy as it<br />

adjoins the A56 dual carriageway<br />

and most is also used for<br />

employment purposes. Not very<br />

suitable for housing and no history<br />

of planning applications for such a<br />

use<br />

674 <strong>Land</strong> east of<br />

Hollin Way,<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

(Constablee<br />

Development 2)<br />

Facit Mill,<br />

Whitworth<br />

<strong>Land</strong> at<br />

Hollins<br />

Lane,<br />

Rawtenstal<br />

l<br />

Mill End<br />

Mill,<br />

Waterfoot<br />

Whinberry<br />

View,<br />

Bacup<br />

Road,<br />

Rawtenstal<br />

l<br />

Yes - registered<br />

provider in<br />

negotiations.<br />

Yes - site<br />

submitted as part<br />

of Site Allocations<br />

DPD and<br />

discussions had<br />

with owners and<br />

developers<br />

Yes - owner in<br />

negotiations with<br />

potential<br />

developers<br />

Yes - site<br />

submitted as part<br />

of Site Allocations<br />

DPD and<br />

discussions had<br />

with owners and<br />

developers<br />

676 <strong>Land</strong> west of<br />

Hollin Way,<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

(Constablee<br />

Development 5)<br />

487 Woodtop garage,<br />

Townsendfold<br />

Mytholme House,<br />

burnley Road<br />

East, waterfoot<br />

Albion Mill,<br />

Burnley road<br />

East, Waterfoot<br />

Employment land<br />

adj to Grane<br />

Road and<br />

Holcombe Road,<br />

Haslingden<br />

Waterfoot Primary<br />

school site<br />

668 <strong>Land</strong> off Rochdale<br />

Road, adjacent to<br />

Sheephouses<br />

Reservoir<br />

44 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />

Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />

Green field land<br />

39<br />

35<br />

30 Application 2006/464 refused on the 7<br />

Nov 2006 for 28 dwellings on grounds<br />

including overdevelopment and<br />

highway grounds<br />

25 Long standing outline approval has<br />

never yet been implemented.<br />

Extension of time limit approved to<br />

keep it “live”<br />

24<br />

24 A planning application for housing<br />

was refused on this site in approx.<br />

2006 on various grounds. No<br />

applications since<br />

21<br />

20 No planning approvals found for<br />

this site currently in commercial<br />

use<br />

19 This is employment land.<br />

10 No planning approval found for this<br />

site<br />

80 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />

Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />

Green field land<br />

11


823 <strong>Land</strong> off Cherry<br />

Tree Lane/ Lower<br />

Clowes Road,<br />

Townsendfold,<br />

Rawtensall<br />

30 Part of site is outside the Urban<br />

boundary.<br />

Most of the developable land<br />

inside the boundary is a recreation<br />

(football) site and where residents<br />

have resisted housing<br />

development in the past. Other<br />

parts of the site have been planted<br />

with trees by the council in the<br />

1970’s. In addition much of the site<br />

was the subject of a court case<br />

where compensation was granted<br />

on the grounds of land<br />

instabilityuch of the site is<br />

protected by the retained Local<br />

Plan policy relating to<br />

“Greenlands”<br />

564 <strong>Land</strong> to the rear<br />

of Waingate,<br />

Spring Side,<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

1161 <strong>Land</strong> of<br />

Helmshore Road,<br />

Helmshore<br />

1183 <strong>Land</strong> behind<br />

Pennine Road,<br />

Bacup<br />

659 <strong>Land</strong> off<br />

Greensnook<br />

Lane, Bacup<br />

689 <strong>Land</strong> behind<br />

Pennine Road,<br />

Bacup<br />

1271 Mill adjacent to<br />

Deansgreave<br />

Road, New Line,<br />

Britannia<br />

654 <strong>Land</strong> at Robert<br />

Street,<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

30 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />

Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />

Green field land<br />

50<br />

Potential access difficulties<br />

The 2010 SHLAA report states<br />

“Available within 6-10 years”<br />

This is parkland. Moreover it is<br />

replacement land for land taken from<br />

Victoria Park when the A56 bypass<br />

was constructed in the late 1970’s<br />

50 2010 SHLAA concludes”<br />

Necessary infrastructure is unlikely to<br />

be in place to permit development of<br />

the<br />

site<br />

Availability Available within 11-15<br />

years”<br />

And<br />

“Desireability of Wider area: Poor<br />

Desireability”<br />

50<br />

50<br />

50 2012/0385 is for 30 dwellings<br />

40 2010 report concludes<br />

“Downgraded to Category 2 due to<br />

being within Flood Zone 2”.<br />

So, at least 544 out of the 1379 potential dwellings should be discounted as planning<br />

permissions are unlikely to be forthcoming in the near future, if at all, because they lie<br />

outside the Urban Boundary.1379-544 = 835<br />

12


In addition, using actual permissions on the Albert Mill site, Whitworth and at Deansgreave,<br />

Bacup rather than assuming housing numbers reduces the figures by a further 56. Other<br />

doubts as shown in blue raise the figure to be discounted to 343.<br />

Thus the sites listed by the LPA as being available and deliverable within the next 5 years is<br />

actually 1379-( 544+343) = 492<br />

Unimplemented sites with planning permissions<br />

The table in the 2012 report indicates that 32% of these lapse in the current year. There is<br />

also a duplicate for the Old Market Hall, Bacup<br />

Deleting the duplicate, but making no allowance for the applications which may lapse in<br />

2013, gives a total of 412-28= 384 houses<br />

Unimplemented Residential Planning<br />

Permissions<br />

The table below identifies planning permissions across the <strong>Borough</strong> that have not yet<br />

started and that will not expire until after 1st April 2013.<br />

Application<br />

number<br />

Site address<br />

Expiry<br />

Date<br />

Dwgs<br />

approv<br />

ed<br />

Appellant<br />

comments<br />

2010/0092 Kearns Mill Cowpe Road<br />

Cowpe Waterfoot<br />

20-May-13 39 This is a<br />

renewal of an<br />

earlier<br />

permission<br />

which has not<br />

been<br />

implemented<br />

Planning<br />

application<br />

2013/0090,<br />

validated on the<br />

26 March, 2013<br />

(Yet to be<br />

determined) is<br />

for 22 dwellings<br />

on the site) i.e.<br />

17 less<br />

13


2010/0286 Holcombe Road Helmshore<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong> Lancashire<br />

2010/0406 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to 368 Rochdale<br />

Road Bacup OL13 9TH<br />

2010/0433 <strong>Land</strong> off Eastgate Whitworth<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

2010/0552 Farm Hill Farm Edge Side Lane<br />

Waterfoot<br />

14<br />

19-Oct-13 32 Underway<br />

24-Oct-13 13<br />

2007/555 New Line Bacup OL13 0BY 08-Jan-14 1<br />

2010/0557 Anvil Street Stacksteads Bacup 18-Jan-14 11<br />

2009/0133 Carr Road, Water 30-Jan-14 1<br />

2008/0124 Rawtenstall BB4 6EU 10-Feb-14 1<br />

2008/0102 Stubbylee Lane Bacup<br />

15-Feb-14 1<br />

Lancashire OL13 0DD<br />

2010/0366 <strong>Land</strong> opposite 449- 457 Bacup 28-Feb-14 20<br />

Road Hareholme<br />

2010/0678 Vacant <strong>Land</strong> Adjoining 4 01-Mar-14 1<br />

Parkinson Street Haslingden<br />

2011/0009 Greens Lane Bacup 06-Mar-14 1<br />

2011/0003 Daisy Nook Honey Hole 07-Mar-14 1<br />

Stacksteads Bacup<br />

2010/0689 550 Market Street, Shawforth 09-Mar-14 2<br />

2011/0007 Burnley Road, Bacup 22-Mar-14 1<br />

2011/0008 23 Plantation Street,<br />

31-Mar-14 1<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

2011/0068 Haslingden Road, 10-Apr-14 1<br />

2011/0183 Side garden of 214 Burnley<br />

Road Weir Lancashire OL13<br />

8QE<br />

08-Jun-14 1<br />

2008/0673 214 Burnley Road East Weir<br />

Bacup OL13 8QE<br />

2010/0101 Old Market Hall Bank Street<br />

Bacup<br />

30-Nov-13 45 There are very<br />

old permissions<br />

on this site<br />

which have<br />

never been<br />

implemented<br />

12-Dec-13 1 130 lapse in<br />

2013 unless<br />

renewed (32%)<br />

08-Jun-14 1<br />

2011/0199 Tonacliffe Way Whitworth 19-Jun-14 1<br />

2011/0197 Market Street, Edenfield 20-Jun-14 5<br />

2011/0223 Market Street, Edenfield 05-Jul-14 1<br />

2011/0148 Heald Lane, Weir 21-Jul-14 1<br />

2011/0274 Laneside Farm Goodshaw Lane<br />

Loveclough <strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4<br />

8RB<br />

13-Jun-14 25 There are old<br />

approvals for<br />

this listed<br />

building which<br />

have never<br />

come to<br />

anything<br />

24-Jul-14 1<br />

2011/0036 Loveclough, <strong>Rossendale</strong> 25-Jul-14 1


2011/0280 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to 35 Blackburn 26-Jul-14 1<br />

Road Haslingden <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

Lancashire BB4 5QG<br />

2011/0291 Park Road, Haslingden 11-Aug-14 4<br />

2011/0295 Gander Brow Market Street 04-Sep-14 1<br />

Shawforth Rochdale OL12 8XD<br />

2001/0295 Market Street, Whitworth 04-Sep-14 1<br />

2008/0393 Tunstead Stacksteads 07-Sep-14 1<br />

2011/0417 1 Lower Clowes, Rawtenstall 29-Sep-14 1<br />

2011/0404 1/3 Height End Cottages Kirk<br />

Hill Road HASLINGDEN BB4<br />

8TZ<br />

25-Oct-14 2<br />

2011/0505 373-375 Manchester Road<br />

Haslingden <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

Lancashire BB4 6PT<br />

2011/0464 28 Lincoln Street Haslingden<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong> Lancashire BB4<br />

5DT<br />

2010/0101 Old Market Hall Bank Street<br />

Bacup Lancashire OL13 8HD<br />

15<br />

20-Nov-14 1<br />

04-Dec-14 2<br />

07-Dec-14 28 This is a<br />

duplicate of an<br />

earlier entry<br />

11-Dec-14 1<br />

2011/0509 684 Burnley Road East<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 9NT<br />

2011/0543 Freeholds Mill Market Street 11-Dec-14 1<br />

Shawforth<br />

2011/0406 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent 143 Todmorden 15-Dec-14 1<br />

Road Bacup OL13 9UA<br />

2012/0032 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent 143 Todmorden 15-Dec-14 1 126 lapse in<br />

Road Bacup OL13 9UA<br />

2014<br />

2011/0537 <strong>Land</strong> north of 101 Tonacliffe 05-Jan-15 1<br />

Road Whitworth<br />

2008/0761 227 Bury Road Rawtenstall 23-Jan-15 4<br />

2011/0633 7 The Cloisters Bacup Road 14-Feb-15 1<br />

Waterfoot <strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 7JU<br />

2011/0590 <strong>Land</strong> to the south of Bury Old 20-Feb-15 1<br />

Road Shuttleworth Ramsbottom<br />

Lancashire<br />

2012/0028 75 Bank Street Rawtenstall<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 7QN<br />

2012/0057 512 Burnley Road East<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 9LB<br />

2012/0056 <strong>Land</strong> off Brandwood Road<br />

Brandwood Bridge Stacksteads<br />

Bacup <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

27-Mar-15 1<br />

12-Apr-15 2<br />

17-Apr-15 1<br />

2012/0055 Gordon Works Ashworth Road 20-Apr-15 4<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 9JE<br />

2012/0020 Garden of 110 Bury Road 26-Apr-15 1<br />

Edenfield BL0 0ET<br />

2009/0016 BB4 6AA 26-Apr-15 4<br />

2012/0117 Stables Hud Hey Road Rising 27-Apr-15 1


Bridge Haslingden BB4 5JL<br />

2011/0631 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent 271 Holcombe 01-May-15 1<br />

Road Helmshore BB4 4NP<br />

2012/0203 33-35 Thorburn Drive Whitworth 18-Jun-15 1<br />

Rochdale OL12 8UJ<br />

2012/0204 2 & 4 Hawthorn Road Bacup 19-Jun-15 1<br />

OL13 9LQ<br />

2012/0096 1 Laburnham Street Haslingden 20-Jun-15 8<br />

2012/0156 Ashley Court, Whitworth 25-Jun-15 -8<br />

2011/0637 Rockcliffe Road 26-Jun-15 82 Now underway<br />

2012/0077 Ashfield Vicarage, Rawtenstall 02-Jul-15 1<br />

2012/0177 58 Crabtree Avenue Waterfoot 12-Jul-15 2<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

2012/0304 <strong>Land</strong> Adjacent to Dykes Barn 13-Jul-15 1<br />

Farm Burnley Road<br />

Broadclough Bacup OL13 8RQ<br />

2012/0198 Plots 17-20 Kandel Place 19-Jul-15 4<br />

Whitworth <strong>Rossendale</strong> OL12<br />

8RF<br />

2012/0231 Acre Mill Acre View Stacksteads 24-Jul-15 30<br />

Bacup<br />

2012/0210 Higher Mill, Rawtenstall 24-Jul-15 12 156 lapse in<br />

2015<br />

Total Dwellings Not Started/<br />

Unimplemented<br />

412<br />

All of the above gives the following available figures for land availability, based on the LPA<br />

2012 report:-<br />

Houses still to be completed on sites underway 555<br />

Unimplemented sites with planning permissions – 367<br />

as amended in the table above<br />

Other sites considered by the LPA to be<br />

492<br />

deliverable (After deleting the most dubious and<br />

as shown in red and blue above) (1379-644)<br />

Totals 1414<br />

B.Allowance for the none take up of available sites<br />

Reference is made in the initial Appeal Statement to the Wychavon appeal decision where<br />

the Inspector considered that a 10% reduction in housing land availability was reasonable to<br />

account for the none take up of sites<br />

16


An analysis of the LPA’s 2012 document with regard to the take up of sites with planning<br />

permissions indicates that such a percentage reduction would be at best conservative:-<br />

Residential Development Currently<br />

Under Construction<br />

The table below identifies housing sites across the <strong>Borough</strong> that are currently under<br />

construction.<br />

Application<br />

no<br />

Site name Site address Dwgs<br />

approved<br />

Dwgs<br />

built<br />

%built since<br />

approved<br />

1996/341 Hollin Way Burnley Road, Constablee 175 109 62% in 17<br />

yrs<br />

1997/233 Park View <strong>Land</strong> off Mill Row/Woodcroft 5 0 Nil in 16 yrs<br />

Street<br />

2000/484 Crown Estate <strong>Land</strong> between Rockcliffe Rd &<br />

Rochdale Rd<br />

8 2 25% in 13<br />

yrs<br />

2002/293 Mangol Fold Barn Mangol Farm Elm Street Edenfield 1 1 100%<br />

<strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

2003/143 Grane Road 20 Grane Road Haslingden 8 7 87% in 10<br />

yrs<br />

2003/154 <strong>Land</strong> at Irwell Springs Weir <strong>Land</strong> at Irwell Springs Weir 56 14 25% in 10<br />

yrs<br />

2003/310 Lea Bank, Hareholme Hareholme Lane Cloughfold 18 17 94% in 10<br />

yrs<br />

2004/012 Former Chapel off York Street Crawshawbooth 12 8 66% in 9 yrs<br />

2004/277 Pendle Avenue Bacup 20 21 100%<br />

2004/360 Rear of 278-300 Newchurch<br />

4 2<br />

Road<br />

2004/401 (A) Woodland Grange <strong>Land</strong> between Douglas Road & 196 138 70% in 9 yrs<br />

Tong Lane<br />

2004/891 <strong>Land</strong> to rear of 278-300<br />

Stacksteads 4 1 25% in 9 yrs<br />

Newchurch Road<br />

2005/106 <strong>Land</strong> of Beaufort Road Weir 8 5 62% in 8 yrs<br />

2005/142 Rochdale Road Rochdale Road Bacup 162 78 48% in 8 yrs<br />

2005/526 Cockhall Farm Water Street Whitworth OL12 8XL 5 1 20% in 8 yrs<br />

2005/647 Holme Street Stacksteads 2 1 50% in 8 yrs<br />

2005/652 Former Rockcliffe Club Rockcliffe Road Bacup 16 4 25% in 8 yrs<br />

2005/729 Higher Mill Millgate Road East Parade 15 3 20% in 8 yrs<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

2005/733 Garage land Industry Street Whitworth 4 2 50% in 8 yrs<br />

2006/280 <strong>Land</strong> off York Street Crawshawbooth 7 2 28% in 7 yrs<br />

2006/320 Holly Mount House St Marys Way Rawtenstall 53 18 34% in 7 yrs<br />

2006/608 Bridge Mill Bridge Mill North Street Whitworth 28 19 68% in 7 yrs<br />

2006/696 Slaughter House Slaughter House Burnley Road 21 11 52% in 7 yrs<br />

East Whitewell Bottom BB4<br />

2007/016 <strong>Land</strong> off Oaklands and Lower Oaklands <strong>Land</strong> off Oaklands and 49 9 18% in 6 yrs<br />

Cribden Ave<br />

Lower Cribden Avenue<br />

Rawtenstall<br />

2008/0702 Moorgate Tong Lane Bacup <strong>Rossendale</strong> 4 1 25% in5 yrs<br />

Lancashire OL13 9JQ<br />

2010/0428 Alden Place <strong>Land</strong> off Free Lane Free Lane<br />

Helmshore<br />

37 25 68% in3 yrs<br />

2010/0667 Orama Mill Hall Street, Whitworth 85 0 Nil in 3 yrs<br />

2011/0046 Holmefield House Holmefield House, Holcombe<br />

Road, Helmshore, <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />

74 0 Nil in 2 yrs –<br />

but now<br />

underway<br />

2012/0044 Springfield Court, Bacup Springfield Court, Bacup -23 0 Nil in 1 yr<br />

17


1054 499<br />

Applying a 10% reduction to the above and to the sites still to be started gives a figure<br />

of 1273 dwellings<br />

The LPA 2012 housing report calculates that a 5 year supply equates to either 1447 or<br />

1482 dwellings.<br />

Either way the LPA’s figures show an undersupply at some 4.3 years.<br />

In addition the LPA densities used are likely to be too high as it is still using the minimum<br />

density figures advised by the former government. Further, the reduction used of 10%<br />

seems too low in view of the development history within the <strong>Borough</strong><br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!