Land Supply Analysis - Rossendale Borough Council
Land Supply Analysis - Rossendale Borough Council
Land Supply Analysis - Rossendale Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Critique of housing land supply in <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
April 2013<br />
Core Strategy<br />
The Core Strategy was adopted on the 8 November, 2011 and establishes policy for the<br />
period 2011 to 2026.<br />
Policy 2: Meeting <strong>Rossendale</strong>’s Housing Requirement<br />
The net housing requirement for the period 2011-2026, will be achieved through:<br />
1. Providing at least 3700 net additional dwellings over the plan period 2011-2026<br />
equating to 247 dwellings per year<br />
2. Allocating greenfield and previously developed land to meet the requirement for<br />
the period 2011-2026 to meet identified type, size and tenure needs; including<br />
indicative phasing where appropriate<br />
3. Delivering an overall amount of 65% of all new dwellings on previously developed<br />
land (PDL) across the <strong>Borough</strong>. Rawtenstall will have a lower PDL figure, with<br />
substantially higher levels in Bacup, Haslingden and Whitworth<br />
4. Supporting the reuse and conversion of appropriate buildings for housing<br />
5. Encouraging higher density developments (50+ dwellings per hectare) in<br />
sustainable locations, such as within and adjacent to Rawtenstall, Bacup,<br />
Haslingden and Whitworth and where well served by public transport, with a<br />
minimum density of 30dph across the <strong>Borough</strong><br />
6. Safeguarding the character of established residential areas from over-intensive<br />
and inappropriate new development; and<br />
7. Prioritising the development of previously developed land. However,<br />
development of un-allocated greenfield land will be permitted where:<br />
i. It is for 100% affordable and/or supported housing schemes; or<br />
ii. It forms a minor part (up to 15% of the overall site size) of a larger mixed use scheme or a<br />
major housing proposal (10+ dwellings) on previously developed land or<br />
iii. It delivers a significant social, economic, or environmental benefit, or<br />
iv. The application is for a barn conversion and it can be demonstrated that the<br />
site has been marketed for economic uses for 12 months, to the satisfaction of the<br />
<strong>Council</strong>, and is not viable for these purposes<br />
1
The <strong>Council</strong>’s Annual Monitoring statements 20010/11 and 2011/12<br />
The monitoring statements give the following figures for housing completions in<br />
recent years:-<br />
2005/6 206<br />
2006/7 114<br />
2007/8 222<br />
2008/9 54<br />
2009/10 173<br />
2010/11 74<br />
2011/12 119<br />
Thus, an annual target of 247 dwellings per year is very challenging and a high supply of<br />
deliverable sites will be required. Such a figure has never been attained over the past 7<br />
years and the average completion rate, at 137, is more than a hundred per year below the<br />
target figure. Moreover the NPPF advocates that where there is evidence of<br />
underperformance the 5 year supply should be augmented by 20%. That puts the annual<br />
target at 296 and is more than twice the average for the past 7 years.<br />
Calculating the 5 year supply of deliverable housing land in the <strong>Borough</strong><br />
A. The <strong>Council</strong>’s Housing <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> report 2012-2017<br />
This is the latest assessment by the LPA of housing land availability, produced in September<br />
2012 and relating to the period from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2017.<br />
The report includes 2 scenarios. The first takes the average of 247 houses needed per year<br />
and adds 20% for previous underperformance. This gives a 5 year requirement of 1482<br />
dwellings.<br />
Scenario 2 is based on an assumed accelerating housing trajectory over the next 15 years<br />
(though with no evidence that such an accelerator is likely). This gives a figure for the next 5<br />
years of 1447 dwellings.<br />
2
B. Appeal decisions guidance on calculating the 5 year supply<br />
1) Appeal decision. High Peak <strong>Borough</strong> council (APP/H1033/A/11/2159038) 23 August,<br />
2012<br />
In allowing the appeal for, amongst other reasons, a lack of a 5 year supply of deliverable<br />
housing land, the Inspector opined as follows:-<br />
10. The most up-to-date planning policy document, the National Planning Policy<br />
Framework (the Framework), was issued in March 2012. The Framework at 47<br />
requires that local planning authorities should … identify and update annually a<br />
supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide 5 years’ worth of housing<br />
against their housing requirements with an additional buffer of 5% (moved<br />
forward from later in the Plan period) to ensure choice and competition in the<br />
market for land. Footnote 11 to 47 explains that to be considered deliverable,<br />
sites should be available now… and be achievable with a realistic prospect that<br />
housing will be delivered on the site within 5 years …. Footnote 11 states that<br />
sites with planning permission should be considered deliverable until permission<br />
expires, unless there is clear evidence that schemes will not be implemented<br />
within 5 years, for example they will not be viable…. The inclusion of the phrase<br />
until permission expires strongly implies that a site which no longer has – or,<br />
significantly, has not yet received – planning permission for housing is not to be<br />
considered deliverable in the terms of the Framework.<br />
2) Appeal decision. Wincanton (APP/R3325/A/12/2170082) determined on 29 August, 2012<br />
Sites without planning permission<br />
30. The Framework advises that to be considered deliverable, sites should be<br />
available now. Accordingly, sites without planning permission should not be<br />
included in the supply, except as described below. (The “below” relates to windfall sites)<br />
Housing supply in the <strong>Borough</strong> in the light of the above<br />
The LPA’s Housing <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> report 2012-2017 gives the following figures in relation to<br />
the target requirement of 1482 dwellings from 1 April 2012 and for the following 5 years:-<br />
3
Most of the “number of dwellings from specific deliverable sites” either do not have planning<br />
permissions or are in areas where such permissions for housing development are unlikely to<br />
be forthcoming. If this category is omitted then the availability of deliverable housing land is<br />
as follows:-<br />
Sites where a start has been made but 555<br />
where there are outstanding completions<br />
remaining<br />
Sites with planning permissions which will 412<br />
not lapse until 2012 but where no start had<br />
been made<br />
Total 967<br />
Shortfall for next 5 years -515<br />
Percentage shortfall 35%<br />
Years supply at a requirement of 296 3.27 years<br />
dwellings per year<br />
4
More detailed analysis<br />
Data sources<br />
In 2008 the LPA commissioned Roger Tym Assocs. to produce a report into likely available<br />
housing sites in the <strong>Borough</strong> in order to show that there was at least a 5 year supply of<br />
housing land. Possible sites were categorised into three, with category 1 sites being the<br />
most suitable and category 3 sites being the least suitable or least likely to be available<br />
within 5 years. The conclusion was that a 5 year supply could indeed be shown – though<br />
the analysis included very many sites lacking planning permissions and discussions with<br />
land owners was not particularly robust.<br />
That report has been used by the LPA as a “rolling programme” since then to update its data<br />
on housing land availability.<br />
In particular, this supplementary analysis has looked at the following reports published by<br />
the LPA since that time:-<br />
1. The LPA SHLAA report of December, 2010 as this contains details of the individual<br />
sites which the LPA claims provide a 5 year supply of deliverable housing land<br />
2. The “ 5 Year Housing <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> Report 2012-2017” published in September, 2012<br />
3. The LPA’s Site Allocations and Development Management DPD which it is currently<br />
undertaking as it moves towards the production of a new local plan for the borough<br />
4. The LPA’s adopted Core Strategy and its current policies with regard to the release<br />
of land beyond the saved Urban Boundary of the old Local Plan.<br />
Core Strategy policy with regard to the release of sites for development beyond the saved<br />
Urban Boundary<br />
The adopted Core Strategy has “saved” the Urban Boundary as delineated on the previous<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong> District Local Plan which had been adopted in 1996.<br />
The Core Strategy resists most development outside the Urban Boundary in accordance<br />
with its policy 1:-<br />
5
Review of the Urban Boundary and the suitability of new sites for housing<br />
The LPA is currently undertaking a review of possible new sites for inclusion within the<br />
urban Boundary – but as it’s published literature makes clear it may still be two years away<br />
from finalisation:-<br />
The following is taken from the LPA’s website (April 2013)<br />
Lives & <strong>Land</strong>scapes<br />
Local Plan Part 2 - Site Allocations and Development<br />
Management DPD<br />
View pages in this section<br />
Lives & <strong>Land</strong>scapes is the second part of <strong>Rossendale</strong>s Local Plan and will designate land<br />
and buildings for future uses such as housing, parks, shops, schools and parking. It will also<br />
set out what new developments should look like, how they should be constructed as well as<br />
how they should fit in with their surroundings.<br />
Latest News!<br />
Consultation Comments on the Green Belt & Urban Boundary Review<br />
View the comments received on the Green Belt and Urban Boundary Review<br />
The <strong>Council</strong> will assess each comment in turn and will publish a further report in the summer<br />
of 2013 setting out its responses to the submissions made.<br />
What things will be allocated?<br />
All sorts of land uses and facilities will be looked at potentially allocated, for example:<br />
Car Parks Local Nature Reserves All Types & Size of Housing Offices<br />
Shops Industrial Areas Play Grounds Allotments<br />
Sports Pitches Parks Health Centres Schools<br />
Hotels Tourist Attractions Park and Ride Green Belt<br />
Countryside Local Green Spaces Recreation & Leisure Facilities Infrastructure<br />
Will you be looking at the Green Belt and Urban Boundaries?<br />
Yes. The current boundaries were drawn 15+ years ago and things have changed since then.<br />
We need to take a look at them now to make sure that they are accurate as well as make room<br />
for future needs.<br />
7
But, don't panic! We're not planning to radically change the boundaries and we understand<br />
how important the countryside is to local people and the natural environment.<br />
How will it be done?<br />
We plan to prepare the document in a logical sequence to make it as easy and clear to<br />
understand and follow as possible. As such it will be broken down into 3 distinct parts:<br />
1. Green Belt and Urban Boundary Review<br />
2. Allocating <strong>Land</strong> and Buildings<br />
3. Policies for Types of Development and Design & Materials<br />
Doing it this way will allow us to objectively assess sites based upon where the boundaries<br />
should be and then produce policies for those sites once we know what they are going to be<br />
used for.<br />
How long will it take?<br />
It's a detailed document and it will take between 2-3 years before its finished.<br />
It takes this long because we have to look at every site in detail and examine all the pros and<br />
cons - this takes time. We also need time for full public consultation and we also need to<br />
make sure that we satisfy all the relevant legal requirements.<br />
How do I get involved and have my say?<br />
By its nature Lives & <strong>Land</strong>scapes will attract a lot of attention and it is important to us that<br />
you get the opportunity to give us your views. Throughout the process we will actively seek<br />
your comments and give you as much opportunity as possible to tell us your thoughts.<br />
We will do this by:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Establishing a Community Forum for community and voluntary groups which meet at<br />
regular and meaningful points in time before, during and after each stage of<br />
consultation<br />
Arrange public meetings for residents and local businesses who cannot make the<br />
Community Forum or who are not part of a community or voluntary group<br />
Help you to submit comments and understand the process<br />
You can get involved by:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Attending the forums and/or public meetings<br />
Send us your comments by email, post, facebook, twitter etc<br />
Submit sites for us to consider for allocation<br />
Invite us to a meeting to sit down and explain the process and address any concerns<br />
you might have<br />
8
How will the <strong>Council</strong> make sure that people know about it?<br />
We know you care about <strong>Rossendale</strong> and your views are important to us. Therefore we will<br />
publicise Lives & <strong>Land</strong>scapes as best as possible, including:<br />
Newspaper Adverts and<br />
Articals<br />
Community Forums & Word<br />
of Mouth<br />
Posters and Leaflets to Local<br />
Communities<br />
Facebook, Twitter etc Radio (if possible) Public Meetings<br />
Letters and Emails Attending Events<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong> <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
Website<br />
Any other things you or we can think of!<br />
Are the views of developers and land owners more important?<br />
No. It doesn't matter whether you're a developer, landowner, builder, local resident,<br />
community group or a local business, all views are treated equally.<br />
Do you have to own land to put it forward for allocation?<br />
No. Anyone can submit sites for us to consider - you don't have to own it for us to look at it,<br />
we'll sort that bit out.<br />
So, the LPA continues to use the current Urban Boundary to contain most development and<br />
is resistant to housing development outside it. That position is unlikely to change for at least<br />
another two years and any changes at that time are still very uncertain and cannot be relied<br />
upon.<br />
<strong>Analysis</strong> of the LPA’s housing supply data in the light of the above<br />
A. Sites which have been included but which are outside the current Urban Boundary<br />
The LPA’s “5 Year Housing <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> Report 2012-2017“published in September 2012<br />
includes in its provision of a 5 year housing supply a list of sites totalling 1379 dwellings<br />
(Page 13). Most of the sites mentioned have a serial number attached to them and these<br />
can be traced back to the maps as contained in the LPA’s 2010 SHLAA. Others relate to the<br />
on-going review of the Urban Boundary which still has some two years to run.<br />
An analysis of these sites shows that the following would be most unlikely to be granted<br />
planning permission at the present time as they are outside the Urban Boundary and where<br />
9
current Core Strategy policy would be resistant to their release. Housing numbers shown in<br />
red should be discounted on allocation grounds alone<br />
Sites with comments in red are outside the Urban Boundary. Sites in blue are identified as<br />
available in the LPA’s 5 year land supply report but have other major constraints attaching to<br />
them or the number of suggested dwellings is too high.<br />
<strong>Supply</strong> of Specific Deliverable Sites<br />
The table below identifies sites across the <strong>Borough</strong> that are considered to be deliverable<br />
between 1st April 2012 and 31st March 2017, in accordance with the provisions of<br />
paragraph 47 and footnote 11 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) March<br />
2012.<br />
Site ID<br />
(SHLAA)<br />
Location/addres<br />
s<br />
635 / 710 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to<br />
Grane Road and<br />
Holcombe Road,<br />
Haslingden<br />
671 <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
Hospital Site,<br />
Haslingden Road,<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
17 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to<br />
Moorland Rise,<br />
Haslingden<br />
673 <strong>Land</strong> north of<br />
Lime Tree Grove,<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
(Constablee<br />
Development 1)<br />
Albert Mill and<br />
Sunnyside,<br />
Whitworth<br />
<strong>Land</strong> between<br />
Reedsholme and<br />
Short Clough<br />
Reservoir,<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
Comments<br />
No<br />
of<br />
dwg<br />
s<br />
160 L<strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />
Boundary of the District Local Plan.<br />
Site 635. The 2010 SHLAA states<br />
“Downgraded to Category 2 as not<br />
available within 5 years”<br />
139<br />
Site 710. Former gas works site<br />
100 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />
Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />
The 2010 SHLAA states<br />
“Available within 11-15 years<br />
84 Potential access issues, with a<br />
“ransom strip” for access from the<br />
south<br />
75 2012/0558 is an outline approval<br />
for up to 49 dwellings granted on<br />
the<br />
50 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />
Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />
Green field land<br />
10
<strong>Land</strong> adjacent<br />
to A56,<br />
Haslingden<br />
50 Most of this site is very noisy as it<br />
adjoins the A56 dual carriageway<br />
and most is also used for<br />
employment purposes. Not very<br />
suitable for housing and no history<br />
of planning applications for such a<br />
use<br />
674 <strong>Land</strong> east of<br />
Hollin Way,<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
(Constablee<br />
Development 2)<br />
Facit Mill,<br />
Whitworth<br />
<strong>Land</strong> at<br />
Hollins<br />
Lane,<br />
Rawtenstal<br />
l<br />
Mill End<br />
Mill,<br />
Waterfoot<br />
Whinberry<br />
View,<br />
Bacup<br />
Road,<br />
Rawtenstal<br />
l<br />
Yes - registered<br />
provider in<br />
negotiations.<br />
Yes - site<br />
submitted as part<br />
of Site Allocations<br />
DPD and<br />
discussions had<br />
with owners and<br />
developers<br />
Yes - owner in<br />
negotiations with<br />
potential<br />
developers<br />
Yes - site<br />
submitted as part<br />
of Site Allocations<br />
DPD and<br />
discussions had<br />
with owners and<br />
developers<br />
676 <strong>Land</strong> west of<br />
Hollin Way,<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
(Constablee<br />
Development 5)<br />
487 Woodtop garage,<br />
Townsendfold<br />
Mytholme House,<br />
burnley Road<br />
East, waterfoot<br />
Albion Mill,<br />
Burnley road<br />
East, Waterfoot<br />
Employment land<br />
adj to Grane<br />
Road and<br />
Holcombe Road,<br />
Haslingden<br />
Waterfoot Primary<br />
school site<br />
668 <strong>Land</strong> off Rochdale<br />
Road, adjacent to<br />
Sheephouses<br />
Reservoir<br />
44 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />
Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />
Green field land<br />
39<br />
35<br />
30 Application 2006/464 refused on the 7<br />
Nov 2006 for 28 dwellings on grounds<br />
including overdevelopment and<br />
highway grounds<br />
25 Long standing outline approval has<br />
never yet been implemented.<br />
Extension of time limit approved to<br />
keep it “live”<br />
24<br />
24 A planning application for housing<br />
was refused on this site in approx.<br />
2006 on various grounds. No<br />
applications since<br />
21<br />
20 No planning approvals found for<br />
this site currently in commercial<br />
use<br />
19 This is employment land.<br />
10 No planning approval found for this<br />
site<br />
80 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />
Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />
Green field land<br />
11
823 <strong>Land</strong> off Cherry<br />
Tree Lane/ Lower<br />
Clowes Road,<br />
Townsendfold,<br />
Rawtensall<br />
30 Part of site is outside the Urban<br />
boundary.<br />
Most of the developable land<br />
inside the boundary is a recreation<br />
(football) site and where residents<br />
have resisted housing<br />
development in the past. Other<br />
parts of the site have been planted<br />
with trees by the council in the<br />
1970’s. In addition much of the site<br />
was the subject of a court case<br />
where compensation was granted<br />
on the grounds of land<br />
instabilityuch of the site is<br />
protected by the retained Local<br />
Plan policy relating to<br />
“Greenlands”<br />
564 <strong>Land</strong> to the rear<br />
of Waingate,<br />
Spring Side,<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
1161 <strong>Land</strong> of<br />
Helmshore Road,<br />
Helmshore<br />
1183 <strong>Land</strong> behind<br />
Pennine Road,<br />
Bacup<br />
659 <strong>Land</strong> off<br />
Greensnook<br />
Lane, Bacup<br />
689 <strong>Land</strong> behind<br />
Pennine Road,<br />
Bacup<br />
1271 Mill adjacent to<br />
Deansgreave<br />
Road, New Line,<br />
Britannia<br />
654 <strong>Land</strong> at Robert<br />
Street,<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
30 <strong>Land</strong> is outside the retained Urban<br />
Boundary of the District Local Plan<br />
Green field land<br />
50<br />
Potential access difficulties<br />
The 2010 SHLAA report states<br />
“Available within 6-10 years”<br />
This is parkland. Moreover it is<br />
replacement land for land taken from<br />
Victoria Park when the A56 bypass<br />
was constructed in the late 1970’s<br />
50 2010 SHLAA concludes”<br />
Necessary infrastructure is unlikely to<br />
be in place to permit development of<br />
the<br />
site<br />
Availability Available within 11-15<br />
years”<br />
And<br />
“Desireability of Wider area: Poor<br />
Desireability”<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50 2012/0385 is for 30 dwellings<br />
40 2010 report concludes<br />
“Downgraded to Category 2 due to<br />
being within Flood Zone 2”.<br />
So, at least 544 out of the 1379 potential dwellings should be discounted as planning<br />
permissions are unlikely to be forthcoming in the near future, if at all, because they lie<br />
outside the Urban Boundary.1379-544 = 835<br />
12
In addition, using actual permissions on the Albert Mill site, Whitworth and at Deansgreave,<br />
Bacup rather than assuming housing numbers reduces the figures by a further 56. Other<br />
doubts as shown in blue raise the figure to be discounted to 343.<br />
Thus the sites listed by the LPA as being available and deliverable within the next 5 years is<br />
actually 1379-( 544+343) = 492<br />
Unimplemented sites with planning permissions<br />
The table in the 2012 report indicates that 32% of these lapse in the current year. There is<br />
also a duplicate for the Old Market Hall, Bacup<br />
Deleting the duplicate, but making no allowance for the applications which may lapse in<br />
2013, gives a total of 412-28= 384 houses<br />
Unimplemented Residential Planning<br />
Permissions<br />
The table below identifies planning permissions across the <strong>Borough</strong> that have not yet<br />
started and that will not expire until after 1st April 2013.<br />
Application<br />
number<br />
Site address<br />
Expiry<br />
Date<br />
Dwgs<br />
approv<br />
ed<br />
Appellant<br />
comments<br />
2010/0092 Kearns Mill Cowpe Road<br />
Cowpe Waterfoot<br />
20-May-13 39 This is a<br />
renewal of an<br />
earlier<br />
permission<br />
which has not<br />
been<br />
implemented<br />
Planning<br />
application<br />
2013/0090,<br />
validated on the<br />
26 March, 2013<br />
(Yet to be<br />
determined) is<br />
for 22 dwellings<br />
on the site) i.e.<br />
17 less<br />
13
2010/0286 Holcombe Road Helmshore<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong> Lancashire<br />
2010/0406 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to 368 Rochdale<br />
Road Bacup OL13 9TH<br />
2010/0433 <strong>Land</strong> off Eastgate Whitworth<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
2010/0552 Farm Hill Farm Edge Side Lane<br />
Waterfoot<br />
14<br />
19-Oct-13 32 Underway<br />
24-Oct-13 13<br />
2007/555 New Line Bacup OL13 0BY 08-Jan-14 1<br />
2010/0557 Anvil Street Stacksteads Bacup 18-Jan-14 11<br />
2009/0133 Carr Road, Water 30-Jan-14 1<br />
2008/0124 Rawtenstall BB4 6EU 10-Feb-14 1<br />
2008/0102 Stubbylee Lane Bacup<br />
15-Feb-14 1<br />
Lancashire OL13 0DD<br />
2010/0366 <strong>Land</strong> opposite 449- 457 Bacup 28-Feb-14 20<br />
Road Hareholme<br />
2010/0678 Vacant <strong>Land</strong> Adjoining 4 01-Mar-14 1<br />
Parkinson Street Haslingden<br />
2011/0009 Greens Lane Bacup 06-Mar-14 1<br />
2011/0003 Daisy Nook Honey Hole 07-Mar-14 1<br />
Stacksteads Bacup<br />
2010/0689 550 Market Street, Shawforth 09-Mar-14 2<br />
2011/0007 Burnley Road, Bacup 22-Mar-14 1<br />
2011/0008 23 Plantation Street,<br />
31-Mar-14 1<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
2011/0068 Haslingden Road, 10-Apr-14 1<br />
2011/0183 Side garden of 214 Burnley<br />
Road Weir Lancashire OL13<br />
8QE<br />
08-Jun-14 1<br />
2008/0673 214 Burnley Road East Weir<br />
Bacup OL13 8QE<br />
2010/0101 Old Market Hall Bank Street<br />
Bacup<br />
30-Nov-13 45 There are very<br />
old permissions<br />
on this site<br />
which have<br />
never been<br />
implemented<br />
12-Dec-13 1 130 lapse in<br />
2013 unless<br />
renewed (32%)<br />
08-Jun-14 1<br />
2011/0199 Tonacliffe Way Whitworth 19-Jun-14 1<br />
2011/0197 Market Street, Edenfield 20-Jun-14 5<br />
2011/0223 Market Street, Edenfield 05-Jul-14 1<br />
2011/0148 Heald Lane, Weir 21-Jul-14 1<br />
2011/0274 Laneside Farm Goodshaw Lane<br />
Loveclough <strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4<br />
8RB<br />
13-Jun-14 25 There are old<br />
approvals for<br />
this listed<br />
building which<br />
have never<br />
come to<br />
anything<br />
24-Jul-14 1<br />
2011/0036 Loveclough, <strong>Rossendale</strong> 25-Jul-14 1
2011/0280 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to 35 Blackburn 26-Jul-14 1<br />
Road Haslingden <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
Lancashire BB4 5QG<br />
2011/0291 Park Road, Haslingden 11-Aug-14 4<br />
2011/0295 Gander Brow Market Street 04-Sep-14 1<br />
Shawforth Rochdale OL12 8XD<br />
2001/0295 Market Street, Whitworth 04-Sep-14 1<br />
2008/0393 Tunstead Stacksteads 07-Sep-14 1<br />
2011/0417 1 Lower Clowes, Rawtenstall 29-Sep-14 1<br />
2011/0404 1/3 Height End Cottages Kirk<br />
Hill Road HASLINGDEN BB4<br />
8TZ<br />
25-Oct-14 2<br />
2011/0505 373-375 Manchester Road<br />
Haslingden <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
Lancashire BB4 6PT<br />
2011/0464 28 Lincoln Street Haslingden<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong> Lancashire BB4<br />
5DT<br />
2010/0101 Old Market Hall Bank Street<br />
Bacup Lancashire OL13 8HD<br />
15<br />
20-Nov-14 1<br />
04-Dec-14 2<br />
07-Dec-14 28 This is a<br />
duplicate of an<br />
earlier entry<br />
11-Dec-14 1<br />
2011/0509 684 Burnley Road East<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 9NT<br />
2011/0543 Freeholds Mill Market Street 11-Dec-14 1<br />
Shawforth<br />
2011/0406 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent 143 Todmorden 15-Dec-14 1<br />
Road Bacup OL13 9UA<br />
2012/0032 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent 143 Todmorden 15-Dec-14 1 126 lapse in<br />
Road Bacup OL13 9UA<br />
2014<br />
2011/0537 <strong>Land</strong> north of 101 Tonacliffe 05-Jan-15 1<br />
Road Whitworth<br />
2008/0761 227 Bury Road Rawtenstall 23-Jan-15 4<br />
2011/0633 7 The Cloisters Bacup Road 14-Feb-15 1<br />
Waterfoot <strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 7JU<br />
2011/0590 <strong>Land</strong> to the south of Bury Old 20-Feb-15 1<br />
Road Shuttleworth Ramsbottom<br />
Lancashire<br />
2012/0028 75 Bank Street Rawtenstall<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 7QN<br />
2012/0057 512 Burnley Road East<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 9LB<br />
2012/0056 <strong>Land</strong> off Brandwood Road<br />
Brandwood Bridge Stacksteads<br />
Bacup <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
27-Mar-15 1<br />
12-Apr-15 2<br />
17-Apr-15 1<br />
2012/0055 Gordon Works Ashworth Road 20-Apr-15 4<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong> BB4 9JE<br />
2012/0020 Garden of 110 Bury Road 26-Apr-15 1<br />
Edenfield BL0 0ET<br />
2009/0016 BB4 6AA 26-Apr-15 4<br />
2012/0117 Stables Hud Hey Road Rising 27-Apr-15 1
Bridge Haslingden BB4 5JL<br />
2011/0631 <strong>Land</strong> adjacent 271 Holcombe 01-May-15 1<br />
Road Helmshore BB4 4NP<br />
2012/0203 33-35 Thorburn Drive Whitworth 18-Jun-15 1<br />
Rochdale OL12 8UJ<br />
2012/0204 2 & 4 Hawthorn Road Bacup 19-Jun-15 1<br />
OL13 9LQ<br />
2012/0096 1 Laburnham Street Haslingden 20-Jun-15 8<br />
2012/0156 Ashley Court, Whitworth 25-Jun-15 -8<br />
2011/0637 Rockcliffe Road 26-Jun-15 82 Now underway<br />
2012/0077 Ashfield Vicarage, Rawtenstall 02-Jul-15 1<br />
2012/0177 58 Crabtree Avenue Waterfoot 12-Jul-15 2<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
2012/0304 <strong>Land</strong> Adjacent to Dykes Barn 13-Jul-15 1<br />
Farm Burnley Road<br />
Broadclough Bacup OL13 8RQ<br />
2012/0198 Plots 17-20 Kandel Place 19-Jul-15 4<br />
Whitworth <strong>Rossendale</strong> OL12<br />
8RF<br />
2012/0231 Acre Mill Acre View Stacksteads 24-Jul-15 30<br />
Bacup<br />
2012/0210 Higher Mill, Rawtenstall 24-Jul-15 12 156 lapse in<br />
2015<br />
Total Dwellings Not Started/<br />
Unimplemented<br />
412<br />
All of the above gives the following available figures for land availability, based on the LPA<br />
2012 report:-<br />
Houses still to be completed on sites underway 555<br />
Unimplemented sites with planning permissions – 367<br />
as amended in the table above<br />
Other sites considered by the LPA to be<br />
492<br />
deliverable (After deleting the most dubious and<br />
as shown in red and blue above) (1379-644)<br />
Totals 1414<br />
B.Allowance for the none take up of available sites<br />
Reference is made in the initial Appeal Statement to the Wychavon appeal decision where<br />
the Inspector considered that a 10% reduction in housing land availability was reasonable to<br />
account for the none take up of sites<br />
16
An analysis of the LPA’s 2012 document with regard to the take up of sites with planning<br />
permissions indicates that such a percentage reduction would be at best conservative:-<br />
Residential Development Currently<br />
Under Construction<br />
The table below identifies housing sites across the <strong>Borough</strong> that are currently under<br />
construction.<br />
Application<br />
no<br />
Site name Site address Dwgs<br />
approved<br />
Dwgs<br />
built<br />
%built since<br />
approved<br />
1996/341 Hollin Way Burnley Road, Constablee 175 109 62% in 17<br />
yrs<br />
1997/233 Park View <strong>Land</strong> off Mill Row/Woodcroft 5 0 Nil in 16 yrs<br />
Street<br />
2000/484 Crown Estate <strong>Land</strong> between Rockcliffe Rd &<br />
Rochdale Rd<br />
8 2 25% in 13<br />
yrs<br />
2002/293 Mangol Fold Barn Mangol Farm Elm Street Edenfield 1 1 100%<br />
<strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
2003/143 Grane Road 20 Grane Road Haslingden 8 7 87% in 10<br />
yrs<br />
2003/154 <strong>Land</strong> at Irwell Springs Weir <strong>Land</strong> at Irwell Springs Weir 56 14 25% in 10<br />
yrs<br />
2003/310 Lea Bank, Hareholme Hareholme Lane Cloughfold 18 17 94% in 10<br />
yrs<br />
2004/012 Former Chapel off York Street Crawshawbooth 12 8 66% in 9 yrs<br />
2004/277 Pendle Avenue Bacup 20 21 100%<br />
2004/360 Rear of 278-300 Newchurch<br />
4 2<br />
Road<br />
2004/401 (A) Woodland Grange <strong>Land</strong> between Douglas Road & 196 138 70% in 9 yrs<br />
Tong Lane<br />
2004/891 <strong>Land</strong> to rear of 278-300<br />
Stacksteads 4 1 25% in 9 yrs<br />
Newchurch Road<br />
2005/106 <strong>Land</strong> of Beaufort Road Weir 8 5 62% in 8 yrs<br />
2005/142 Rochdale Road Rochdale Road Bacup 162 78 48% in 8 yrs<br />
2005/526 Cockhall Farm Water Street Whitworth OL12 8XL 5 1 20% in 8 yrs<br />
2005/647 Holme Street Stacksteads 2 1 50% in 8 yrs<br />
2005/652 Former Rockcliffe Club Rockcliffe Road Bacup 16 4 25% in 8 yrs<br />
2005/729 Higher Mill Millgate Road East Parade 15 3 20% in 8 yrs<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
2005/733 Garage land Industry Street Whitworth 4 2 50% in 8 yrs<br />
2006/280 <strong>Land</strong> off York Street Crawshawbooth 7 2 28% in 7 yrs<br />
2006/320 Holly Mount House St Marys Way Rawtenstall 53 18 34% in 7 yrs<br />
2006/608 Bridge Mill Bridge Mill North Street Whitworth 28 19 68% in 7 yrs<br />
2006/696 Slaughter House Slaughter House Burnley Road 21 11 52% in 7 yrs<br />
East Whitewell Bottom BB4<br />
2007/016 <strong>Land</strong> off Oaklands and Lower Oaklands <strong>Land</strong> off Oaklands and 49 9 18% in 6 yrs<br />
Cribden Ave<br />
Lower Cribden Avenue<br />
Rawtenstall<br />
2008/0702 Moorgate Tong Lane Bacup <strong>Rossendale</strong> 4 1 25% in5 yrs<br />
Lancashire OL13 9JQ<br />
2010/0428 Alden Place <strong>Land</strong> off Free Lane Free Lane<br />
Helmshore<br />
37 25 68% in3 yrs<br />
2010/0667 Orama Mill Hall Street, Whitworth 85 0 Nil in 3 yrs<br />
2011/0046 Holmefield House Holmefield House, Holcombe<br />
Road, Helmshore, <strong>Rossendale</strong><br />
74 0 Nil in 2 yrs –<br />
but now<br />
underway<br />
2012/0044 Springfield Court, Bacup Springfield Court, Bacup -23 0 Nil in 1 yr<br />
17
1054 499<br />
Applying a 10% reduction to the above and to the sites still to be started gives a figure<br />
of 1273 dwellings<br />
The LPA 2012 housing report calculates that a 5 year supply equates to either 1447 or<br />
1482 dwellings.<br />
Either way the LPA’s figures show an undersupply at some 4.3 years.<br />
In addition the LPA densities used are likely to be too high as it is still using the minimum<br />
density figures advised by the former government. Further, the reduction used of 10%<br />
seems too low in view of the development history within the <strong>Borough</strong><br />
18