Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast - 10 March 2011 - Regulation and ...
Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast - 10 March 2011 - Regulation and ...
Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast - 10 March 2011 - Regulation and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12.0 Hygiene Practices<br />
STANDARD 7.0<br />
HYGIENE PRACTICES<br />
H<strong>and</strong> hygiene procedures; h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> disposal of sharps; use<br />
of PPE; use of isolation facilities <strong>and</strong> implementation of infection<br />
control procedures; cleaning of ward/ department; staff uniform<br />
<strong>and</strong> work wear<br />
Hygiene Practices 6A M2<br />
Effective h<strong>and</strong> hygiene<br />
procedures<br />
<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>10</strong>0<br />
Safe h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> disposal<br />
of sharps<br />
<strong>10</strong>0 <strong>10</strong>0<br />
Effective use of PPE 95 <strong>10</strong>0<br />
Correct use of isolation 89 <strong>10</strong>0<br />
Effective cleaning of ward <strong>10</strong>0 <strong>10</strong>0<br />
Staff uniform <strong>and</strong> work<br />
wear<br />
93 89<br />
Average Score 96 98<br />
Meadowl<strong>and</strong>s 2 are commended for achieving full compliance in the<br />
majority of sections within hygiene practices.<br />
In both wards the results of the audit indicate that effective hygiene<br />
practices were in place. H<strong>and</strong> hygiene practices observed complied<br />
with WHO (World Health Organisation) guidance on the correct<br />
technique to use for h<strong>and</strong> washing <strong>and</strong> appliance of h<strong>and</strong> rub.<br />
Observations indicated that staff performed h<strong>and</strong> hygiene at the<br />
appropriate moments for h<strong>and</strong> hygiene.<br />
In the both wards single use aprons <strong>and</strong> gloves were worn when in<br />
contact or anticipated contact with blood, body fluids or in potential<br />
contact with contaminated items. Inspectors observed that aprons <strong>and</strong><br />
gloves were changed between patients <strong>and</strong> between different episodes<br />
of care. In Withers 6A a member of staff disposed of PPE incorrectly<br />
into a household waste bin due to the position <strong>and</strong> distance of the<br />
clinical waste bin.<br />
On the day of the inspection patients in both wards required isolation<br />
<strong>and</strong> practices observed in relation to the application of isolation<br />
precautions were good <strong>and</strong> in line with current practice guidance.<br />
A review of documentation in Meadowl<strong>and</strong>s 2 evidenced that a patient<br />
centred care pathway for the identified alert organism was in place <strong>and</strong><br />
completed by staff. However in Withers 6A the care plan of the patient<br />
in protective isolation did not indicate that the patient was in isolation or<br />
that any other infection prevention <strong>and</strong> control measures were in place.<br />
At the feedback session trust representatives advised that new care<br />
41