23.06.2014 Views

Perception of tonalness of tyre/road noise and objective ... - Acoustics

Perception of tonalness of tyre/road noise and objective ... - Acoustics

Perception of tonalness of tyre/road noise and objective ... - Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The 33 rd International Congress <strong>and</strong> Exposition<br />

on Noise Control Engineering<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>tonalness</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>objective</strong><br />

correlates<br />

S. Buss, R. Weber<br />

Oldenburg University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Natural Sciences,<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Physics, <strong>Acoustics</strong> Group, Germany<br />

s<strong>and</strong>ra@aku.physik.uni-oldenburg.de<br />

Abstract [256] The geometry <strong>of</strong> the tread pattern has an important influence on <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>.<br />

This pattern <strong>noise</strong> is a tonal component <strong>of</strong> the <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> with speed dependent frequency. If<br />

<strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> is perceived inside the car, this leads to a decreased quality rating in a subjective<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>.<br />

In order to find an <strong>objective</strong> parameter describing the subjectively perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong>, <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong><br />

<strong>noise</strong>s are evaluated in subjective tests. The evaluated <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>s are <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> recordings<br />

<strong>and</strong> modifications <strong>of</strong> these signals with systematically varied spectra.<br />

For the subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> pattern <strong>noise</strong> correlating <strong>objective</strong> signal parameters will be<br />

presented. Also <strong>objective</strong> parameters calculated after a preprocessing with an aurally adequate signal<br />

analysis are compared to the subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>s.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

While a car is rolling pattern <strong>noise</strong> is generated at the contact area between the <strong>tyre</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>road</strong><br />

surface. The pattern <strong>noise</strong> has speed dependent frequency components around the 60th order <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>tyre</strong> revolutions according to the distribution <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> the tread pattern elements. This<br />

range is called the first pitch harmonics. An increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics leads<br />

to an increased pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength [1].<br />

In order to find an <strong>objective</strong> parameter describing the subjective perception <strong>of</strong> pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength, three experiments are carried out. The subjective rating obtained in the experiments will be<br />

correlated to two <strong>objective</strong> level parameters.<br />

2 SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF PATTERN NOISE<br />

Three experiments are carried out concerning the subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> pattern <strong>noise</strong>:<br />

- Experiment 1 (Level variation <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics): 84 signals with a systematically<br />

varied level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics are rank ordered according to their pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength (see also [1]). The first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> four <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> recordings is<br />

amplified by between -10 <strong>and</strong> 10 dB. With a 2AFC-procedure for different <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>s<br />

(original recording or a modification) the amplification <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong><br />

1/8


another recording is measured leading to the same pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength. The experiment is<br />

carried out by four subjects: one female <strong>and</strong> three male.<br />

- Experiment 2 (Variation <strong>of</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics): In a paired<br />

comparison test Thurstonian scale values according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> 6 signals<br />

with a systematically varied spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics are obtained. The<br />

signals are based on one <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> recording. Besides the original spectral shape the<br />

different spectral shapes are obtained by an amplification <strong>of</strong> one or two third around the<br />

mean <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics by 2 or 4 dB <strong>and</strong> a following attenuation <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first pitch harmonics to the original level. Since the differences between these signals is<br />

small a paired comparison test is carried in order to have a great accuracy <strong>of</strong> the subjective<br />

rating. By means <strong>of</strong> Thurstone's law <strong>of</strong> comparative judgment the subjective ratings are<br />

interval scaled. Eight subjects take part in the experiment: two female <strong>and</strong> six male.<br />

- Experiment 3 (Variation <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics): In<br />

the first two experiments the influence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>and</strong> the<br />

spectral shape on the subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength are assessed isolated<br />

from each other. In a third experiment the combined influence <strong>of</strong> both parameters on the<br />

pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength is evaluated. A second paired comparison test leads to Thurstonian<br />

scale values according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> 12 signals with a systematically varied<br />

level <strong>and</strong> spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. All signals are based on one <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong><br />

<strong>noise</strong> recording. Here the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is the original level <strong>and</strong> an<br />

amplification <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics by 0.5 <strong>and</strong> 1 dB. The different spectral shapes are<br />

the original shape <strong>and</strong> an amplification <strong>of</strong> one third around the mean <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics by 2 or 4 dB <strong>and</strong> an amplification <strong>of</strong> two third around the mean <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics by 4 dB. The first pitch harmonics than is attenuated in order to leave the level <strong>of</strong><br />

the first pitch harmonics constant for all different spectral shapes <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics. The experiment is carried out by ten subjects: three female <strong>and</strong> seven male.<br />

The assessed signals are <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> recordings with an artificial head st<strong>and</strong>ing on the front<br />

passenger seat while the car is coasting <strong>and</strong> modifications <strong>of</strong> these signals. The signals are about 6s<br />

long <strong>and</strong> represent a coasting from 110 to 100 km/h.<br />

The experiment is carried out in a soundpro<strong>of</strong> chamber. The signals are played back via<br />

headphones. All signals have the same dB(A)-level <strong>of</strong> 69 dB(A).<br />

The subjects are untrained in evaluating <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>.<br />

3 OBJECTIVE SIGNAL PARAMETERS<br />

3.1 Level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics<br />

From the averaged order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the left <strong>and</strong> right channel the level in the range <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

pitch harmonics (approx. 50th to 85th order) is calculated.<br />

The subjective ranking <strong>of</strong> the signals in the first experiment is significantly correlated with the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. This can be seen in figure 1 for one subject (see also [1]). The<br />

correlation coefficients <strong>of</strong> all subjects are between 0.85 <strong>and</strong> 0.92 <strong>and</strong> are therefore significant.<br />

2/8


80<br />

ranking according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics [dB(A)]<br />

Figure 1: Ranking <strong>of</strong> the signals according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in the first experiment (variation <strong>of</strong><br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. This plot shows<br />

a typical ranking by one subject. There is a significant correlation (r=0.92*)(* = significant with p≤0.05).<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

Thurstonian scale value accoring<br />

to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

53 53.5 54 54.5 55<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics [dB(A)]<br />

Figure 2: Interval scaled Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals representing the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in<br />

the second experiment (variation <strong>of</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. There is no significant correlation (r=-0.08).<br />

3/8


The paired comparison data <strong>of</strong> the experiment concerned with the variation <strong>of</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong><br />

the first pitch harmonics is interval scaled by Thurstone's law <strong>of</strong> comparative judgment. These<br />

interval scaled data is plotted against the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics . As shown in figure 2 the<br />

Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals in the second experiment do not correlate with the level <strong>of</strong><br />

the first pitch harmonics. In this experiment the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

signals is varied while the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is held nearly constant. It can be seen<br />

that the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics can not be the only parameter being related to the pattern<br />

<strong>noise</strong> strength. Also the spectral shape has an influence on the amount <strong>of</strong> perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong>.<br />

3<br />

Thurstonian scale value according<br />

to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

53.8 54 54.2 54.4 54.6 54.8<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics [dB(A)]<br />

Figure 3: Interval scaled Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals representing the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in<br />

the third experiment (variation <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. There is no significant correlation (r=-0.23).<br />

In the third experiment there is also no correlation between the Thurstonian scale values <strong>and</strong> the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics (figure 3). Since the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics seem to have an influence on the perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength, it can not be described<br />

by the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics alone.<br />

3.2 Level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks<br />

The frequency tracks represent the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>. By means <strong>of</strong> the<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware VIPER (Cortex Instruments) the frequency tracks <strong>of</strong> the signals are calculated. The<br />

procedure is based on the aurally adequate signal analysis by calculating contours in [2] <strong>and</strong> [bib4].<br />

The time course <strong>of</strong> tonal component characterised by local maxima in level at each point in time are<br />

extracted. Also the masking properties <strong>of</strong> the human ear are regarded. The noisy parts <strong>of</strong> the signal<br />

are not further analysed. From the frequency tracks an order spectrum is calculated. Analog to the<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

frequency tracks is calculated as the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics from the order spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

the contours. By this value the level <strong>of</strong> the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is<br />

represented.<br />

4/8


80<br />

ranking according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks [dB]<br />

Figure 4: Ranking <strong>of</strong> the signals according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in the first experiment (variation <strong>of</strong><br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency<br />

tracks. This plot shows a typical ranking by one subject. There is a significant correlation (r=0.96*)(*<br />

means significant with p≤ 0.05).<br />

The ranking <strong>of</strong> the signals in the first experiment is significantly correlated with the level <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks (figure 4). For all subjects the correlation coefficient is<br />

significant <strong>and</strong> lies in the range 0.94 to 0.97. This correlation is stronger than in the case <strong>of</strong> the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. This finding indicates the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics<br />

being the important factor <strong>of</strong> the pattern <strong>noise</strong>. Since the pattern <strong>noise</strong> is a tonal component <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>, this result could be expected.<br />

Though there is a general increase <strong>of</strong> the Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the second experiment with<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks, the correlation is not significant (figure<br />

5). But in contrast to the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics there is a clear tendency <strong>of</strong> an increase <strong>of</strong><br />

pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength with increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks. So<br />

also in this experiment an increasing pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength with increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks can be assumed, but it does not get significant.<br />

5/8


3<br />

2.5<br />

Thurstonian scale value according<br />

to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

18.5 19 19.5 20 20.5<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks [dB]<br />

Figure 5: Interval scaled Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals representing the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in<br />

the second experiment (variation <strong>of</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks. There is no significant correlation (r=0.46)<br />

3<br />

Thurstonian scale value according<br />

to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> stregth<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2 19.4 19.6 19.8 20<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks [dB]<br />

Figure 6: Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals representing pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in the third experiment<br />

(variation <strong>of</strong> level <strong>and</strong> spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks. There is a significant correlation (r=0.91*)(* = significant with p≤0.05).<br />

6/8


If the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics are varied (third experiment), the<br />

Thurstonian scale values are significantly correlated with the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong><br />

the frequency tracks (figure 6). So it can be concluded that the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong><br />

the frequency tracks describes the influence <strong>of</strong> the level as well as the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

pitch harmonics on the perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength.<br />

3.3 Comparison between the order spectra <strong>of</strong> the original signal <strong>and</strong> the frequency<br />

tracks<br />

55<br />

50<br />

original<br />

frequency tracks<br />

45<br />

40<br />

level [dB(A)]/level [dB]<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

order<br />

Figure 7: Order spectra <strong>of</strong> one signal: order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the original signal (solid line) <strong>and</strong> order spectrum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks (dashed line).<br />

In order to demonstrate the influence <strong>of</strong> the calculation <strong>of</strong> frequency tracks on the signal, as an<br />

example the order spectra <strong>of</strong> one signal used in the experiments are plotted in figure 7. The solid<br />

line represents the order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the original signal. After calculating the frequency tracks the<br />

order spectrum looks like the dashed line.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> the order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks is lower than the level <strong>of</strong> the order spectrum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the original signal. This level difference is a result <strong>of</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> the signal to the tonal<br />

components by deleting the noisy parts <strong>of</strong> the signal.<br />

Another difference between both order spectra is the shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. The order<br />

spectrum <strong>of</strong> the original signal shows a b<strong>road</strong> level increase in the range <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics<br />

ranging from about the 45th to about the 90th order. In the order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks<br />

the first pitch harmonics has a clear level increase in the range from about the 50th to about the 70th<br />

order. So by calculating frequency tracks the first pitch harmonics is better distinguished from other<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the signal.<br />

7/8


4 CONCLUSION<br />

Three experiments are carried out in order to evaluate the influence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>and</strong> the combined influence on the<br />

perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength. The level as well as the spectral shape have an influence on the<br />

perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength.<br />

Two <strong>objective</strong> parameters are related to the subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength: a)<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>and</strong> b) the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency<br />

tracks representing the level <strong>of</strong> the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics.<br />

If only the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is varied (Experiment 1), the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

increases with increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. If as well or only the spectral shape is<br />

varied (Experiment 2 <strong>and</strong> 3), the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is not related to the pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength.<br />

Whereas an increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks <strong>and</strong> therefore an<br />

increasing level <strong>of</strong> the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics lead to an increasing pattern<br />

<strong>noise</strong> strength. This relation can be found for all three experiments. It gets significant in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

a level variation <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics (Experiment 1) <strong>and</strong> also an additional variation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics (Experiment 3).<br />

So with increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks the pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength increases. The level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics correlates with the rated pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength only, if the spectral shape is held constant. So the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

frequency tracks shows a stronger relation with the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength than the level <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

pitch harmonics.<br />

Both parameters differ only in the calculation <strong>of</strong> frequency tracks before calculating the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first pitch harmonics. It is shown that an aurally adequate signal analysis extracting tonal<br />

components increases the correlation between <strong>objective</strong> signal parameters <strong>and</strong> the subjective<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> pattern <strong>noise</strong>. This parameter takes into account both the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] S. Buss, R. Weber <strong>and</strong> W. Liederer, ``Objektivierung des subjektiv wahrgenommenen Pr<strong>of</strong>ilgeräuschs in Reifen-<br />

Fahrbahn-Geräuschen'', in Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2002, Bochum, 2002.<br />

[2] M. Mummert, Sprachkodierung durch Konturierung eines gehörangepaßten Spektrogramms und ihre<br />

Anwendung zur Datenreduktion, VDI-Fortschrittberichte, Reihe 10, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1998.<br />

[3] S. Buss <strong>and</strong> R. Weber, ``Subjective <strong>and</strong> <strong>objective</strong> characterization <strong>of</strong> tonal components in <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>'', in<br />

Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2004, Strasbourg, 2004.<br />

[4] P. Daniel, ``Auditory Spectrograms <strong>and</strong> Auditory Contours in Musical <strong>Acoustics</strong>'', in Fortschritte der Akustik –<br />

DAGA 2004, Strasbourg, 2004.<br />

8/8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!