23.06.2014 Views

Perception of tonalness of tyre/road noise and objective ... - Acoustics

Perception of tonalness of tyre/road noise and objective ... - Acoustics

Perception of tonalness of tyre/road noise and objective ... - Acoustics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The 33 rd International Congress <strong>and</strong> Exposition<br />

on Noise Control Engineering<br />

<strong>Perception</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>tonalness</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>objective</strong><br />

correlates<br />

S. Buss, R. Weber<br />

Oldenburg University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Natural Sciences,<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Physics, <strong>Acoustics</strong> Group, Germany<br />

s<strong>and</strong>ra@aku.physik.uni-oldenburg.de<br />

Abstract [256] The geometry <strong>of</strong> the tread pattern has an important influence on <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>.<br />

This pattern <strong>noise</strong> is a tonal component <strong>of</strong> the <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> with speed dependent frequency. If<br />

<strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> is perceived inside the car, this leads to a decreased quality rating in a subjective<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>.<br />

In order to find an <strong>objective</strong> parameter describing the subjectively perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong>, <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong><br />

<strong>noise</strong>s are evaluated in subjective tests. The evaluated <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>s are <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> recordings<br />

<strong>and</strong> modifications <strong>of</strong> these signals with systematically varied spectra.<br />

For the subjective assessment <strong>of</strong> pattern <strong>noise</strong> correlating <strong>objective</strong> signal parameters will be<br />

presented. Also <strong>objective</strong> parameters calculated after a preprocessing with an aurally adequate signal<br />

analysis are compared to the subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>s.<br />

1 INTRODUCTION<br />

While a car is rolling pattern <strong>noise</strong> is generated at the contact area between the <strong>tyre</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>road</strong><br />

surface. The pattern <strong>noise</strong> has speed dependent frequency components around the 60th order <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>tyre</strong> revolutions according to the distribution <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> the tread pattern elements. This<br />

range is called the first pitch harmonics. An increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics leads<br />

to an increased pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength [1].<br />

In order to find an <strong>objective</strong> parameter describing the subjective perception <strong>of</strong> pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength, three experiments are carried out. The subjective rating obtained in the experiments will be<br />

correlated to two <strong>objective</strong> level parameters.<br />

2 SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF PATTERN NOISE<br />

Three experiments are carried out concerning the subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> pattern <strong>noise</strong>:<br />

- Experiment 1 (Level variation <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics): 84 signals with a systematically<br />

varied level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics are rank ordered according to their pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength (see also [1]). The first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> four <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> recordings is<br />

amplified by between -10 <strong>and</strong> 10 dB. With a 2AFC-procedure for different <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>s<br />

(original recording or a modification) the amplification <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong><br />

1/8


another recording is measured leading to the same pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength. The experiment is<br />

carried out by four subjects: one female <strong>and</strong> three male.<br />

- Experiment 2 (Variation <strong>of</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics): In a paired<br />

comparison test Thurstonian scale values according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> 6 signals<br />

with a systematically varied spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics are obtained. The<br />

signals are based on one <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> recording. Besides the original spectral shape the<br />

different spectral shapes are obtained by an amplification <strong>of</strong> one or two third around the<br />

mean <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics by 2 or 4 dB <strong>and</strong> a following attenuation <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first pitch harmonics to the original level. Since the differences between these signals is<br />

small a paired comparison test is carried in order to have a great accuracy <strong>of</strong> the subjective<br />

rating. By means <strong>of</strong> Thurstone's law <strong>of</strong> comparative judgment the subjective ratings are<br />

interval scaled. Eight subjects take part in the experiment: two female <strong>and</strong> six male.<br />

- Experiment 3 (Variation <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics): In<br />

the first two experiments the influence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>and</strong> the<br />

spectral shape on the subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength are assessed isolated<br />

from each other. In a third experiment the combined influence <strong>of</strong> both parameters on the<br />

pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength is evaluated. A second paired comparison test leads to Thurstonian<br />

scale values according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> 12 signals with a systematically varied<br />

level <strong>and</strong> spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. All signals are based on one <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong><br />

<strong>noise</strong> recording. Here the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is the original level <strong>and</strong> an<br />

amplification <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics by 0.5 <strong>and</strong> 1 dB. The different spectral shapes are<br />

the original shape <strong>and</strong> an amplification <strong>of</strong> one third around the mean <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics by 2 or 4 dB <strong>and</strong> an amplification <strong>of</strong> two third around the mean <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics by 4 dB. The first pitch harmonics than is attenuated in order to leave the level <strong>of</strong><br />

the first pitch harmonics constant for all different spectral shapes <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics. The experiment is carried out by ten subjects: three female <strong>and</strong> seven male.<br />

The assessed signals are <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong> recordings with an artificial head st<strong>and</strong>ing on the front<br />

passenger seat while the car is coasting <strong>and</strong> modifications <strong>of</strong> these signals. The signals are about 6s<br />

long <strong>and</strong> represent a coasting from 110 to 100 km/h.<br />

The experiment is carried out in a soundpro<strong>of</strong> chamber. The signals are played back via<br />

headphones. All signals have the same dB(A)-level <strong>of</strong> 69 dB(A).<br />

The subjects are untrained in evaluating <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>.<br />

3 OBJECTIVE SIGNAL PARAMETERS<br />

3.1 Level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics<br />

From the averaged order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the left <strong>and</strong> right channel the level in the range <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

pitch harmonics (approx. 50th to 85th order) is calculated.<br />

The subjective ranking <strong>of</strong> the signals in the first experiment is significantly correlated with the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. This can be seen in figure 1 for one subject (see also [1]). The<br />

correlation coefficients <strong>of</strong> all subjects are between 0.85 <strong>and</strong> 0.92 <strong>and</strong> are therefore significant.<br />

2/8


80<br />

ranking according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics [dB(A)]<br />

Figure 1: Ranking <strong>of</strong> the signals according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in the first experiment (variation <strong>of</strong><br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. This plot shows<br />

a typical ranking by one subject. There is a significant correlation (r=0.92*)(* = significant with p≤0.05).<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

Thurstonian scale value accoring<br />

to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

53 53.5 54 54.5 55<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics [dB(A)]<br />

Figure 2: Interval scaled Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals representing the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in<br />

the second experiment (variation <strong>of</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. There is no significant correlation (r=-0.08).<br />

3/8


The paired comparison data <strong>of</strong> the experiment concerned with the variation <strong>of</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong><br />

the first pitch harmonics is interval scaled by Thurstone's law <strong>of</strong> comparative judgment. These<br />

interval scaled data is plotted against the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics . As shown in figure 2 the<br />

Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals in the second experiment do not correlate with the level <strong>of</strong><br />

the first pitch harmonics. In this experiment the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

signals is varied while the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is held nearly constant. It can be seen<br />

that the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics can not be the only parameter being related to the pattern<br />

<strong>noise</strong> strength. Also the spectral shape has an influence on the amount <strong>of</strong> perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong>.<br />

3<br />

Thurstonian scale value according<br />

to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

53.8 54 54.2 54.4 54.6 54.8<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics [dB(A)]<br />

Figure 3: Interval scaled Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals representing the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in<br />

the third experiment (variation <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. There is no significant correlation (r=-0.23).<br />

In the third experiment there is also no correlation between the Thurstonian scale values <strong>and</strong> the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics (figure 3). Since the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics seem to have an influence on the perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength, it can not be described<br />

by the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics alone.<br />

3.2 Level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks<br />

The frequency tracks represent the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>. By means <strong>of</strong> the<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware VIPER (Cortex Instruments) the frequency tracks <strong>of</strong> the signals are calculated. The<br />

procedure is based on the aurally adequate signal analysis by calculating contours in [2] <strong>and</strong> [bib4].<br />

The time course <strong>of</strong> tonal component characterised by local maxima in level at each point in time are<br />

extracted. Also the masking properties <strong>of</strong> the human ear are regarded. The noisy parts <strong>of</strong> the signal<br />

are not further analysed. From the frequency tracks an order spectrum is calculated. Analog to the<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

frequency tracks is calculated as the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics from the order spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

the contours. By this value the level <strong>of</strong> the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is<br />

represented.<br />

4/8


80<br />

ranking according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks [dB]<br />

Figure 4: Ranking <strong>of</strong> the signals according to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in the first experiment (variation <strong>of</strong><br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency<br />

tracks. This plot shows a typical ranking by one subject. There is a significant correlation (r=0.96*)(*<br />

means significant with p≤ 0.05).<br />

The ranking <strong>of</strong> the signals in the first experiment is significantly correlated with the level <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks (figure 4). For all subjects the correlation coefficient is<br />

significant <strong>and</strong> lies in the range 0.94 to 0.97. This correlation is stronger than in the case <strong>of</strong> the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. This finding indicates the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics<br />

being the important factor <strong>of</strong> the pattern <strong>noise</strong>. Since the pattern <strong>noise</strong> is a tonal component <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>, this result could be expected.<br />

Though there is a general increase <strong>of</strong> the Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the second experiment with<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks, the correlation is not significant (figure<br />

5). But in contrast to the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics there is a clear tendency <strong>of</strong> an increase <strong>of</strong><br />

pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength with increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks. So<br />

also in this experiment an increasing pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength with increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks can be assumed, but it does not get significant.<br />

5/8


3<br />

2.5<br />

Thurstonian scale value according<br />

to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

18.5 19 19.5 20 20.5<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks [dB]<br />

Figure 5: Interval scaled Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals representing the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in<br />

the second experiment (variation <strong>of</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks. There is no significant correlation (r=0.46)<br />

3<br />

Thurstonian scale value according<br />

to the pattern <strong>noise</strong> stregth<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

18 18.2 18.4 18.6 18.8 19 19.2 19.4 19.6 19.8 20<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks [dB]<br />

Figure 6: Thurstonian scale values <strong>of</strong> the signals representing pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength in the third experiment<br />

(variation <strong>of</strong> level <strong>and</strong> spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics) in dependence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks. There is a significant correlation (r=0.91*)(* = significant with p≤0.05).<br />

6/8


If the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics are varied (third experiment), the<br />

Thurstonian scale values are significantly correlated with the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong><br />

the frequency tracks (figure 6). So it can be concluded that the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong><br />

the frequency tracks describes the influence <strong>of</strong> the level as well as the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

pitch harmonics on the perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength.<br />

3.3 Comparison between the order spectra <strong>of</strong> the original signal <strong>and</strong> the frequency<br />

tracks<br />

55<br />

50<br />

original<br />

frequency tracks<br />

45<br />

40<br />

level [dB(A)]/level [dB]<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

order<br />

Figure 7: Order spectra <strong>of</strong> one signal: order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the original signal (solid line) <strong>and</strong> order spectrum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks (dashed line).<br />

In order to demonstrate the influence <strong>of</strong> the calculation <strong>of</strong> frequency tracks on the signal, as an<br />

example the order spectra <strong>of</strong> one signal used in the experiments are plotted in figure 7. The solid<br />

line represents the order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the original signal. After calculating the frequency tracks the<br />

order spectrum looks like the dashed line.<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> the order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks is lower than the level <strong>of</strong> the order spectrum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the original signal. This level difference is a result <strong>of</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> the signal to the tonal<br />

components by deleting the noisy parts <strong>of</strong> the signal.<br />

Another difference between both order spectra is the shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. The order<br />

spectrum <strong>of</strong> the original signal shows a b<strong>road</strong> level increase in the range <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics<br />

ranging from about the 45th to about the 90th order. In the order spectrum <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks<br />

the first pitch harmonics has a clear level increase in the range from about the 50th to about the 70th<br />

order. So by calculating frequency tracks the first pitch harmonics is better distinguished from other<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the signal.<br />

7/8


4 CONCLUSION<br />

Three experiments are carried out in order to evaluate the influence <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch<br />

harmonics <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>and</strong> the combined influence on the<br />

perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength. The level as well as the spectral shape have an influence on the<br />

perceived pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength.<br />

Two <strong>objective</strong> parameters are related to the subjective evaluation <strong>of</strong> the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength: a)<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>and</strong> b) the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency<br />

tracks representing the level <strong>of</strong> the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics.<br />

If only the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is varied (Experiment 1), the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength<br />

increases with increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics. If as well or only the spectral shape is<br />

varied (Experiment 2 <strong>and</strong> 3), the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics is not related to the pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength.<br />

Whereas an increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks <strong>and</strong> therefore an<br />

increasing level <strong>of</strong> the tonal components <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics lead to an increasing pattern<br />

<strong>noise</strong> strength. This relation can be found for all three experiments. It gets significant in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

a level variation <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics (Experiment 1) <strong>and</strong> also an additional variation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

spectral shape <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics (Experiment 3).<br />

So with increasing level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the frequency tracks the pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength increases. The level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics correlates with the rated pattern <strong>noise</strong><br />

strength only, if the spectral shape is held constant. So the level <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

frequency tracks shows a stronger relation with the pattern <strong>noise</strong> strength than the level <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

pitch harmonics.<br />

Both parameters differ only in the calculation <strong>of</strong> frequency tracks before calculating the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first pitch harmonics. It is shown that an aurally adequate signal analysis extracting tonal<br />

components increases the correlation between <strong>objective</strong> signal parameters <strong>and</strong> the subjective<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> pattern <strong>noise</strong>. This parameter takes into account both the level <strong>and</strong> the spectral shape<br />

<strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics <strong>of</strong> the first pitch harmonics.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] S. Buss, R. Weber <strong>and</strong> W. Liederer, ``Objektivierung des subjektiv wahrgenommenen Pr<strong>of</strong>ilgeräuschs in Reifen-<br />

Fahrbahn-Geräuschen'', in Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2002, Bochum, 2002.<br />

[2] M. Mummert, Sprachkodierung durch Konturierung eines gehörangepaßten Spektrogramms und ihre<br />

Anwendung zur Datenreduktion, VDI-Fortschrittberichte, Reihe 10, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1998.<br />

[3] S. Buss <strong>and</strong> R. Weber, ``Subjective <strong>and</strong> <strong>objective</strong> characterization <strong>of</strong> tonal components in <strong>tyre</strong>/<strong>road</strong> <strong>noise</strong>'', in<br />

Fortschritte der Akustik - DAGA 2004, Strasbourg, 2004.<br />

[4] P. Daniel, ``Auditory Spectrograms <strong>and</strong> Auditory Contours in Musical <strong>Acoustics</strong>'', in Fortschritte der Akustik –<br />

DAGA 2004, Strasbourg, 2004.<br />

8/8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!