25.06.2014 Views

Jerry Schaefer - Society for California Archaeology

Jerry Schaefer - Society for California Archaeology

Jerry Schaefer - Society for California Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 8. Fire-affected stones from Room 105 with evidence of polish and ground surfaces (Cat. 4326).<br />

foodways and technology that, even be<strong>for</strong>e they first appeared in San Diego, incorporated elements of<br />

Native American and European traditions in the Mexican heartland.<br />

LITHICS AND OTHER ARTIFACTS<br />

Other traditional Native American artifacts included 30 pieces of lithic debitage, a late-stage<br />

biface core, two other cores, a couple of retouched flakes, and one hammer stone. There were no<br />

projectile points. All these items occur in obvious historic contexts. Items of possible Native American<br />

ownership include a Phoenix button (Carrico 1982; Strong 1960, 1975), found on top of one of the<br />

earliest wall foundations at the site. Two per<strong>for</strong>ated silver coins may also be from Native American<br />

ornaments or clothing.<br />

Another object of likely Native manufacture is a ceramic disk with ground edges (Figure 10).<br />

Similar worked Euro-American ceramics come from ethnohistoric-period sites. Although typically<br />

classified as “gaming pieces,” they may also have been used as jar stoppers or had some other utilitarian<br />

use. This one was made from a blue transfer-printed earthenware. The pattern is “English Cities,” made<br />

by Enoch Wood & Sons of Staf<strong>for</strong>dshire, England (1828-1846). Several other fragments of the same<br />

pattern were found nearby in the same context (Unit 26), where a Bandini-era trash deposit occurred<br />

outside of the kitchen and in association with milling tools and Tizon Brown Ware.<br />

One whole Olivella biplicata shell bead and 53 glass trade beads are also likely evidence of<br />

Native Americans (Figure 11). Drawn and Mandrel-wound bead types are found in ethnohistoric-period<br />

Native American sites throughout the Pacific West and in historic sites at which Native Americans were<br />

present, including ranches, presidios, pueblos, missions, and early American cities (Baker et al. 1995:18;<br />

Karklins and Sprague 1972, 1980; Kidd and Kidd 1970; Motz and Schulz 1980; Ross 1976). Most of<br />

these inexpensive beads were not used by Euro-Americans. Among the most common of the 12 types<br />

were short, ground, multisided drawn beads that occur in translucent blue, opaque black, and clear. They<br />

are often referred to as “Russian Beads” because they were widely traded in the northern Pacific, although<br />

they likely derive from Bohemian manufacturers.<br />

So, a few final questions remain. By what economic or cultural process did ceramics in particular<br />

come into the Bandini household? Do they represent Tizon ceramics becoming a commodity and Native<br />

potters finding an economic niche in Old Town trade? The quantity of Tizon in historic contexts<br />

SCA Proceedings, Volume 26 (2012) <strong>Schaefer</strong>, p. 148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!