28.06.2014 Views

V Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation_2.pdf - Blog Science ...

V Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation_2.pdf - Blog Science ...

V Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation_2.pdf - Blog Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

Session 1: Acute Myelogenous Leukemia - CR1<br />

(Daunorubicin, Ara-C, Thiogmanine) with "ADE 10+3+5" (Ara-C,<br />

Daunorubicin, and Etoposide) as remission induction treatment.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Rationale of Trial Design<br />

The rationale of the MRC AML 10 Trial design (figure) has some<br />

specific points. It is intended that all entrants, who must be under 55 years of<br />

age, should have identical chemotherapy pre-transplant comprising four courses.<br />

The evaluation of transplantation (allogeneic or autologous) will be based on its<br />

potential additional value compared with no further chemotherapy. The<br />

induction and consolidation phases of chemotherapy are designed to achieve a<br />

high rate of remission, and subsequently be of adequate intensity (a) to achieve<br />

the maximum leukaemic cytoreduction as a means of "in vivo purging" of the<br />

harvested marrow, (b) to minimize the risk of relapse during the period of<br />

pre-transplant remission and (c) to provide as good a prospect as possible of<br />

curing patients without recourse to BMT which will be seen in the STOP arm.<br />

On the other hand it was hoped that the chemotherapy would not be sufficiently<br />

severe to prevent patients' progression through the protocol, or to damage the<br />

regenerative potential of the graft or increase the toxicity of a subsequent<br />

transplant.<br />

The myeloablative protocol will be cyclophosphamide/TBI in first<br />

remission but will be Busulphan/Cyclophosphamide in second remission because<br />

uncontrolled data suggest that it may be superior to TBI in this context (8).<br />

PROGRESS REPORT<br />

The study opened in summer 1988. At June 1990, 494 patients were<br />

on study, including 109 children. Of 373 évaluable, 299 (80%) have entered<br />

remission (226/292 adults 77%; 73/81 children 90%). Of those who remitted,<br />

71% achieved CR after course 1, and 24% after course 2, so about three<br />

quarters of the patients will receive 3 courses of post-remission induction<br />

therapy. Important haematological toxicity occurred after courses 3 and 4. The<br />

median times taken to regenerate neutrophils to 1.0 x 10*/1, were 17, 18, 24<br />

and 31 days after the four courses, respectively. Similar prolongation of<br />

thrombocytopenia was noted. Regeneration of platelets to SO X 1071 being<br />

achieved respectively in 16, 19, 24 and 25 days.<br />

Ten patients have relapsed during the time scale of the post-induction<br />

chemotherapy, which is an actuarial relapse of 7-8% in the pre-transplant<br />

interval, indicating that few patients are being lost to the transplant option,<br />

which was the main criticism of the autograft data. Ten patients have died in<br />

remission following course 3 or 4. Although this is not an unacceptable rate<br />

(10 out of 360 courses administered 3%), it is, in part, a reflection of the<br />

haematological toxicity of the protocol combined with the traditional approach<br />

of attempting to give post remission therapy on an increasingly outpatient basis.<br />

While the number of days in hospital did not reflect this (27, 22, 25, 25 days

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!