29.06.2014 Views

Supreme Court of Ohio 2011 Annual Report

Supreme Court of Ohio 2011 Annual Report

Supreme Court of Ohio 2011 Annual Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ensuring Access<br />

The court made progress on<br />

several fronts in <strong>2011</strong>:<br />

PRO BONO SERVICE<br />

Figures released in <strong>2011</strong> showed<br />

that more attorneys in <strong>Ohio</strong><br />

appear to be volunteering legal<br />

service to people in need. <strong>Ohio</strong><br />

attorneys reported 45 percent<br />

more pro bono hours in 2010<br />

than in 2009, for a total <strong>of</strong> almost<br />

140,000 hours, the most in the<br />

three years the statistics have<br />

been collected.<br />

Access to Justice<br />

Chief Justice O’Connor emphasized diversity and access to<br />

justice as major issues for her incoming administration in her<br />

inaugural speech, and throughout the year her colleagues<br />

on the bench joined her in a series <strong>of</strong> changes marking progress<br />

to ensure all <strong>Ohio</strong>ans have timely, fair access to the justice system,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> who they are or where they come from in life.<br />

“In the next six years, we will do better in this area,” Chief Justice<br />

O’Connor said. “This starts with continuing the good work we have<br />

already begun in this area. From the Law and Leadership program<br />

that prepares the next generation <strong>of</strong> urban students to consider a<br />

career in the law, to implementing a new education component to<br />

train judges to recognize and eliminate bias in the courtroom, to<br />

making more court forms accessible in many languages, to requiring<br />

court foreign language interpreters become certified, there are<br />

numerous ways the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> supports greater diversity<br />

throughout the legal system.”<br />

PICTURED: Chief Justice O’Connor congratulates a newly certified<br />

interpreter during a February 1, <strong>2011</strong>, ceremony at the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Ohio</strong> as Interpreter Services Program Manager Bruno Romero looks on.<br />

INTERPRETER SERVICES<br />

In February, the court held a<br />

ceremony honoring the first<br />

group <strong>of</strong> 23 court interpreters<br />

to be certified by the <strong>Supreme</strong><br />

<strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong>.<br />

In July, the court adopted a new<br />

rule requiring courts to hire<br />

a certified foreign language<br />

or sign language interpreter,<br />

when available, to ensure the<br />

“meaningful participation”<br />

<strong>of</strong> deaf and limited English<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>icient individuals in court<br />

proceedings. The rule takes<br />

effect January 1, 2013. Sup.R.<br />

88 also requires courts to “use all<br />

reasonable efforts” to avoid the<br />

appointment <strong>of</strong> interpreters who<br />

may have a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!