13 March 2012 - Scottish Government
13 March 2012 - Scottish Government
13 March 2012 - Scottish Government
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GIRPB/06/02<br />
2. Minutes of previous meeting and matters arising<br />
The minutes were agreed (GIRPB/05/02).<br />
Matters arising from the previous meeting’s actions:<br />
• A paper on Getting it right for young people had been tabled for the<br />
board’s consideration (GIRPB/05/07) – see item 8.<br />
• The Maturity Model had been circulated to the board<br />
(GIRPB/05/03a) – see item 3.1.<br />
• Papers providing the board with an update on information sharing,<br />
including iACT had been tabled for the board’s consideration<br />
(GIRPB/05/06 and GIRPB/05/06a) – see item 7.<br />
• A common template for reporting progress on the board’s Action<br />
Plan had been provided and written updates on each of the actions<br />
submitted (GIRPB/05/04) – see item 5.<br />
• The Risk Register had been refreshed (GIRPB/05/05) – see item 6.<br />
3. Highlight Report<br />
The board reviewed the Highlight Report (GIRPB/05/03).<br />
3.1 Maturity Model<br />
Robin McKendrick reported that the Maturity Model (GIRPB/05/03a)<br />
had been finalised and had been circulated to the GIRFEC team’s<br />
contacts within Community Planning Partnerships (CPPs). Many<br />
had been keen to adopt the model, with some choosing to adapt it<br />
to meet local requirements. It had also been shared with CEL 29<br />
Change Managers.<br />
At this stage, the Maturity Model was to be used as guidance to<br />
provide help and support – this could be as a self evaluation tool or<br />
in planning for full implementation of GIRFEC. Implementation<br />
Advisors would report back on how the five priorities identified by<br />
the board in September 2011 were being implemented across<br />
CPPs.<br />
The board expressed some concern that, due to varying levels of<br />
engagement with CPPs, there were varying degrees of accuracy in<br />
reporting progress. More than a few local authorities appeared to<br />
be coming up against barriers for implementation and there was a<br />
challenge for the board as to how the momentum to break through<br />
these barriers could be provided. It was agreed that the Maturity<br />
Model could be used as the basis of describing progress in each<br />
area, that could then be shared with CPPs for their comment as to<br />
accuracy.<br />
Action: GIRFEC team to report to the board on progress against the five<br />
priorities for implementation across CPP areas.<br />
Boyd McAdam<br />
26 June <strong>2012</strong><br />
2