29.06.2014 Views

13 March 2012 - Scottish Government

13 March 2012 - Scottish Government

13 March 2012 - Scottish Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GIRPB/06/02<br />

2. Minutes of previous meeting and matters arising<br />

The minutes were agreed (GIRPB/05/02).<br />

Matters arising from the previous meeting’s actions:<br />

• A paper on Getting it right for young people had been tabled for the<br />

board’s consideration (GIRPB/05/07) – see item 8.<br />

• The Maturity Model had been circulated to the board<br />

(GIRPB/05/03a) – see item 3.1.<br />

• Papers providing the board with an update on information sharing,<br />

including iACT had been tabled for the board’s consideration<br />

(GIRPB/05/06 and GIRPB/05/06a) – see item 7.<br />

• A common template for reporting progress on the board’s Action<br />

Plan had been provided and written updates on each of the actions<br />

submitted (GIRPB/05/04) – see item 5.<br />

• The Risk Register had been refreshed (GIRPB/05/05) – see item 6.<br />

3. Highlight Report<br />

The board reviewed the Highlight Report (GIRPB/05/03).<br />

3.1 Maturity Model<br />

Robin McKendrick reported that the Maturity Model (GIRPB/05/03a)<br />

had been finalised and had been circulated to the GIRFEC team’s<br />

contacts within Community Planning Partnerships (CPPs). Many<br />

had been keen to adopt the model, with some choosing to adapt it<br />

to meet local requirements. It had also been shared with CEL 29<br />

Change Managers.<br />

At this stage, the Maturity Model was to be used as guidance to<br />

provide help and support – this could be as a self evaluation tool or<br />

in planning for full implementation of GIRFEC. Implementation<br />

Advisors would report back on how the five priorities identified by<br />

the board in September 2011 were being implemented across<br />

CPPs.<br />

The board expressed some concern that, due to varying levels of<br />

engagement with CPPs, there were varying degrees of accuracy in<br />

reporting progress. More than a few local authorities appeared to<br />

be coming up against barriers for implementation and there was a<br />

challenge for the board as to how the momentum to break through<br />

these barriers could be provided. It was agreed that the Maturity<br />

Model could be used as the basis of describing progress in each<br />

area, that could then be shared with CPPs for their comment as to<br />

accuracy.<br />

Action: GIRFEC team to report to the board on progress against the five<br />

priorities for implementation across CPP areas.<br />

Boyd McAdam<br />

26 June <strong>2012</strong><br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!