30.06.2014 Views

Dermacor X-100 Seed Treatment for Rice Water Weevil Control

Dermacor X-100 Seed Treatment for Rice Water Weevil Control

Dermacor X-100 Seed Treatment for Rice Water Weevil Control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> <strong>Seed</strong> <strong>Treatment</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Weevil</strong> <strong>Control</strong><br />

Block 8S<br />

Beaumont, TX<br />

2009<br />

PLOT PLAN<br />

⇐ North<br />

I II III IV<br />

1 5 9 3 17 8 25 3<br />

2 4 10 7 18 2 26 7<br />

3 3 11 1 19 7 27 8<br />

4 8 12 5 20 3 28 4<br />

5 2 13 6 21 5 29 6<br />

6 6 14 4 22 1 30 5<br />

7 7 15 8 23 6 31 1<br />

8 1 16 2 24 4 32 2<br />

Plot size: 7 rows, 7 inch row spacing, 18 ft long, with barriers<br />

Variety: Cocodrie @ 80 lb/A (seed provided by LSU Foundation <strong>Seed</strong>)<br />

Note: smaller numbers in italics are plot numbers<br />

TREATMENT DESCRIPTION, RATE AND TIMING<br />

Rate<br />

<strong>Treatment</strong> no. Description a (fl oz/cwt) (lb ai/A) b<br />

1 <strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> 1.25 0.041<br />

2 <strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> 1.75 0.057<br />

3 <strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> 2.0 0.065<br />

4 <strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> 2.5 0.081<br />

5 DPX-HGW86 1.75 0.057<br />

6 DPX-HGW86 2.5 0.081<br />

7 Karate Z --- 0.03<br />

8 Untreated --- ---<br />

a All treatments are seed treatments except Karate Z (applied be<strong>for</strong>e flood)<br />

b Based on 18,800 Cocodrie seeds/lb<br />

1<br />

M.O. Way ⋅ moway@aesrg.tamu.edu ⋅ (409)752-2741 ext.2231<br />

Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Beaumont ⋅ 1509 Aggie Dr. ⋅ Beaumont, TX 77713 ⋅ http://beaumont.tamu.edu


<strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> <strong>Seed</strong> <strong>Treatment</strong>s <strong>for</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Weevil</strong> <strong>Control</strong><br />

Agronomic and Cultural In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Experimental design: Randomized complete block with 8 treatments and 4 replications<br />

Planting: Drill-seeded Cocodrie @ 80 lb/A into League soil (pH 5.5, sand 3.2%, silt 32.4%,<br />

clay 64.4%, and organic matter 3.8 - 4.8%) on May 21<br />

Plot size = 4ft x 18 ft with metal barriers<br />

Emergence on May 30<br />

Irrigation: Flushed (temporary flood <strong>for</strong> 24 hours, then drain) block on May 21<br />

Permanent flood (PF) on Jun 18<br />

Fertilization: All fertilizer (urea) was distributed by hand.<br />

113.3 lb N/A (2/3 of 170) on May 21 at planting<br />

56/7 lb N/A (1/3 of 170) on Jul 10 at panicle differentiation<br />

40 lb N/A on Aug 8<br />

Total N = 210 lb/A<br />

Herbicide:<br />

<strong>Treatment</strong>s:<br />

Stam 80EDF @ 2.0 lb, Basagran @ 0.75 lb, Facet 75DF @ 0.25 lb and Ordram<br />

@ 2.0 lb (AI)/A and Agri-Dex @ 1.0 pt/A with a 2-person hand-held spray<br />

boom (13- 80015 nozzles, 50 mesh screens, 16 gpa final spray volume) on Jun 8<br />

<strong>for</strong> early season weed control<br />

All seed treatments applied by DuPont<br />

<strong>Treatment</strong> 7 (Karate Z @ 0.03 lb ai/A) applied using a hand-held, CO 2<br />

pressurized, 3 nozzle (800067 tips with 50 mesh screens, 29 gpa) spray rig on<br />

Jun 18<br />

Sampling: Recorded bird damage to all plots and estimated % loss on Jun 2<br />

Stand counts (3, 1 ft counts on rows 2, 4 and 6) on Jun 17<br />

<strong>Rice</strong> water weevil (RWW) cores (5 cores per plot, each core 4 inches diameter, 4<br />

inches deep, containing at least one rice plant) were collected on Jul 10 and Jul<br />

20. Core samples were stored in a cold-room, later washed through 40 mesh<br />

screen buckets and immature RWW counted.<br />

Counted number of whiteheads (WHs – measure of stalk borer damage) in rows<br />

1 – 3 and 5 – 7 of each plot on Sep 1<br />

Harvest: Harvested plots on Sep 3<br />

Size harvested plot = 7 rows, 7 inch row spacing, 18 ft long<br />

Data analysis: RWW and WH counts trans<strong>for</strong>med using x + 0.5 ; yields converted to 12%<br />

moisture; all data analyzed by ANOVA and means separated by LSD<br />

2<br />

M.O. Way ⋅ moway@aesrg.tamu.edu ⋅ (409)752-2741 ext.2231<br />

Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Beaumont ⋅ 1509 Aggie Dr. ⋅ Beaumont, TX 77713 ⋅ http://beaumont.tamu.edu


<strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> <strong>Seed</strong> <strong>Treatment</strong>s <strong>for</strong> <strong>Rice</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Weevil</strong> <strong>Control</strong><br />

Discussion<br />

None of the seed treatments affected rice stands (Table 1). Populations of RWW were<br />

relatively low but still above treatment thresholds in untreated plots on both sample dates. All<br />

treatments provided excellent RWW control on both sample dates. Dissection of rice plants<br />

revealed the predominant stalk borer species in the experiment was Mexican rice borer. All<br />

<strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> seed treatments provided excellent control of stem borers and significantly<br />

reduced WHs compared to DPX-HGW86 and Karate Z plots. However, the high rate of DPX-<br />

HGW86 significantly reduced WH numbers compared to the untreated. The average increase in<br />

yield over the untreated <strong>for</strong> all <strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> treatments was 831 lb/A. The high rate of DPX-<br />

HGW86 outyielded the untreated 932 lb/A.<br />

Table 1. Mean data <strong>for</strong> <strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> seed treatment study. Beaumont, TX. 2009.<br />

Rate b Stand No. RWW c /5 cores WHs c /4 Yield<br />

<strong>Treatment</strong> a (lb ai/A) (plants/3 ft) Jul 10 Jul 20 rows (lb/A)<br />

<strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> 0.041 32 1 b 1 bc 2 d 7958 a<br />

<strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> 0.057 28 0 b 0 c 0 d 7131 bc<br />

<strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> 0.065 32 0 b 0 c 1 d 7568 ab<br />

<strong>Dermacor</strong> X-<strong>100</strong> 0.081 30 0 b 0 c 0 d 7515 ab<br />

DPX-HGW86 0.057 32 0 b 1 b 18 a 7072 bc<br />

DPX-HGW86 0.081 31 0 b 0 c 8 c 7644 ab<br />

Karate Z 0.03 31 0 b 0 c 10 bc 7280 bc<br />

Untreated --- 30 29 a 23 a 15 ab 6712 c<br />

NS<br />

a All treatments are seed treatments except Karate Z (applied be<strong>for</strong>e flood)<br />

b Based on 18,800 Cocodrie seeds/lb<br />

c RWW (larvae + pupae); WHs = whiteheads<br />

Means in a column followed by the same or no letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05,<br />

ANOVA and LSD)<br />

3<br />

M.O. Way ⋅ moway@aesrg.tamu.edu ⋅ (409)752-2741 ext.2231<br />

Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Beaumont ⋅ 1509 Aggie Dr. ⋅ Beaumont, TX 77713 ⋅ http://beaumont.tamu.edu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!