Minutes - La Paz County, Arizona
Minutes - La Paz County, Arizona
Minutes - La Paz County, Arizona
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Board of Adjustment<br />
May 10, 2012<br />
Harbour, it was the homeowner’s responsibility to do their due diligence when it came to<br />
developing their property.<br />
Chairman Cramer asked why the HHPoA did not want to approve a 2’ Variance in<br />
front for this applicant.<br />
Mr. Jones said he has been a Board Member of the HHPoA for 8-10 years. He said it<br />
had become practice to not allow a reduction to the front setback, only the sides and rear.<br />
He said unfortunately many structures with a front setback reduction were built pre 1983<br />
or without the proper permits.<br />
Board Member Plog asked in the last 8-10 years, how much new construction has<br />
occurred?<br />
Director Baker said there have probably been 3-4 building permits and a few Variance<br />
approvals.<br />
Board Member Clark asked how many violations were within the subdivision.<br />
Director Baker said potentially between 30-40 properties were in violation.<br />
Board Member Clark asked how that got by the HHPOA.<br />
Mr. Jones said a lot of construction projects seem to “pop up” on the weekends or in the<br />
evenings. He said the HHPoA didn’t want to act like a big brother, but oftentimes he has<br />
had to go to the <strong>County</strong> himself to see if permits had been pulled.<br />
Joe Dynarski said he has lived in this subdivision for 25 years. He said the new<br />
HHPoA Board Members were trying to stop this, but agreed many projects were thrown<br />
up quickly by weekenders with no consideration for the year rounder’s.<br />
Board Member Chumley asked what happened if they denied this Variance.<br />
Director Baker said they would have to remove 2 more feet off the front of the boat<br />
cover.<br />
Chairman Cramer asked Mr. Tierney if he felt he could cut off 2 more feet of structure<br />
from the front.<br />
Mr. Tierney said the boat cover was originally 26’ long. He said he had already cut off<br />
5’ and if he cut off any more it would not cover the boat completely, which was the<br />
whole intent of the cover (to shade the boat.)<br />
Board Member Plog said we’re talking about 2’ feet here and with all the other<br />
development out of compliance within the subdivision she felt they shouldn’t ask the<br />
Tierney’s to remove 2 more feet of structure. She commented that she has been on this<br />
4