01.11.2012 Views

Minutes - La Paz County, Arizona

Minutes - La Paz County, Arizona

Minutes - La Paz County, Arizona

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Board of Adjustment<br />

May 10, 2012<br />

Harbour, it was the homeowner’s responsibility to do their due diligence when it came to<br />

developing their property.<br />

Chairman Cramer asked why the HHPoA did not want to approve a 2’ Variance in<br />

front for this applicant.<br />

Mr. Jones said he has been a Board Member of the HHPoA for 8-10 years. He said it<br />

had become practice to not allow a reduction to the front setback, only the sides and rear.<br />

He said unfortunately many structures with a front setback reduction were built pre 1983<br />

or without the proper permits.<br />

Board Member Plog asked in the last 8-10 years, how much new construction has<br />

occurred?<br />

Director Baker said there have probably been 3-4 building permits and a few Variance<br />

approvals.<br />

Board Member Clark asked how many violations were within the subdivision.<br />

Director Baker said potentially between 30-40 properties were in violation.<br />

Board Member Clark asked how that got by the HHPOA.<br />

Mr. Jones said a lot of construction projects seem to “pop up” on the weekends or in the<br />

evenings. He said the HHPoA didn’t want to act like a big brother, but oftentimes he has<br />

had to go to the <strong>County</strong> himself to see if permits had been pulled.<br />

Joe Dynarski said he has lived in this subdivision for 25 years. He said the new<br />

HHPoA Board Members were trying to stop this, but agreed many projects were thrown<br />

up quickly by weekenders with no consideration for the year rounder’s.<br />

Board Member Chumley asked what happened if they denied this Variance.<br />

Director Baker said they would have to remove 2 more feet off the front of the boat<br />

cover.<br />

Chairman Cramer asked Mr. Tierney if he felt he could cut off 2 more feet of structure<br />

from the front.<br />

Mr. Tierney said the boat cover was originally 26’ long. He said he had already cut off<br />

5’ and if he cut off any more it would not cover the boat completely, which was the<br />

whole intent of the cover (to shade the boat.)<br />

Board Member Plog said we’re talking about 2’ feet here and with all the other<br />

development out of compliance within the subdivision she felt they shouldn’t ask the<br />

Tierney’s to remove 2 more feet of structure. She commented that she has been on this<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!