16.07.2014 Views

March 22 issue (all sections) - Texas Secretary of State

March 22 issue (all sections) - Texas Secretary of State

March 22 issue (all sections) - Texas Secretary of State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and policies are found at 31 TAC §501.12 (relating to Goals) and<br />

§501.26 (relating to Policies for Construction in the Beach/Dune<br />

System). Because <strong>all</strong> requests for the use <strong>of</strong> coastal public land<br />

must continue to meet the same criteria for GLO approval, GLO<br />

has determined that the proposed actions are consistent with applicable<br />

CMP goals and policies. The proposed amendment will<br />

be distributed to the Commissioner in order to provide him an<br />

opportunity to provide comment on the consistency <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

amendment during the comment period.<br />

The amended rule provides certification that Matagorda's adoption<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ERP as part <strong>of</strong> its plan is consistent with the CMP goals<br />

outlined in 31 TAC §501.12(1) - (3) and (6). These goals seek<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> Coastal Natural Resource Areas (CNRAs), compatible<br />

economic development and multiple uses <strong>of</strong> the coastal<br />

zone, minimization <strong>of</strong> the loss <strong>of</strong> human life and property due<br />

to the impairment and loss <strong>of</strong> CNRA functions, and coordination<br />

<strong>of</strong> GLO and local government decision-making through the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> clear, effective policies for the management <strong>of</strong><br />

CNRAs. The ERP is tailored to the unique natural features, degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> development, storm, and erosion exposure potential for<br />

Matagorda. The ERP is also consistent with the CMP policies<br />

outlined in 31 TAC §501.26(a)(1) and (2) that prohibit construction<br />

within a critical dune area that results in the material weakening<br />

<strong>of</strong> dunes and dune vegetation or adverse effects on the<br />

sediment budget. The ERP will provide reduced impacts to critical<br />

dunes and dune vegetation by establishing requirements for<br />

construction in the DPL, reduce dune area habitat and biodiversity<br />

loss, and reduce structure encroachment on the beach which<br />

leads to interruption <strong>of</strong> the natural sediment cycle.<br />

PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST<br />

To comment on the proposed rulemaking or its consistency with<br />

the CMP goals and policies, please send a written comment to<br />

Walter T<strong>all</strong>ey, <strong>Texas</strong> Register Liaison, General Land Office, P.O.<br />

Box 12873, Austin, <strong>Texas</strong> 78711; facsimile number (512) 463-<br />

6311; or email walter.t<strong>all</strong>ey@glo.texas.gov. Written comments<br />

must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., 30 days from the date<br />

<strong>of</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> this proposal.<br />

STATUTORY AUTHORITY<br />

The amendment is proposed under <strong>Texas</strong> Natural Resources<br />

Code §33.607, relating to GLO's authority to adopt rules for the<br />

preparation and implementation by a local government <strong>of</strong> a plan<br />

for reducing public expenditures for erosion and storm damage<br />

losses to public and private property.<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> Natural Resources Code §§33.601 - 33.613 are affected<br />

by the proposed amendment.<br />

§15.27. Certification Status <strong>of</strong> Matagorda County Dune Protection<br />

and Beach Access Plan.<br />

(a) Matagorda County has submitted to the General Land<br />

Office a dune protection and beach access plan which is certified as<br />

consistent with state law. The county's plan was adopted on February<br />

13, 1995. The General Land Office certifies that the beach users<br />

fees section <strong>of</strong> the Matagorda County plan adopted by the Matagorda<br />

County Commissioners Court on <strong>March</strong> 15, 1999, is consistent with<br />

state law. The General Land Office certifies that the pedestrian beach<br />

at Matagorda Beach as established by amendments to the county's<br />

plan adopted by the Matagorda County Commissioners Court on<br />

October 20, 2003, is consistent with state law. The General Land<br />

Office certifies that the beach user fees as established by amendments<br />

to the county's plan adopted by the Matagorda County Commissioners<br />

Court on February 8, 2010, is consistent with state law.<br />

(b) The General Land Office certifies as consistent with state<br />

law Matagorda County's Dune Protection and Beach Access Plan as<br />

amended to incorporate the county's Erosion Response Plan. The Erosion<br />

Response Plan was adopted by Matagorda County on January 28,<br />

2013 by Commission Order.<br />

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed<br />

by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority<br />

to adopt.<br />

Filed with the Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Secretary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> on <strong>March</strong> 7, 2013.<br />

TRD-201301029<br />

Larry L. Laine<br />

Chief Clerk, Deputy Land Commissioner<br />

General Land Office<br />

Earliest possible date <strong>of</strong> adoption: April 21, 2013<br />

For further information, please c<strong>all</strong>: (512) 475-1859<br />

♦ ♦ ♦<br />

PART 4. SCHOOL LAND BOARD<br />

CHAPTER 155. LAND RESOURCES<br />

SUBCHAPTER A. COASTAL PUBLIC LANDS<br />

31 TAC §155.15<br />

The School Land Board (Board) proposes amendments to 31<br />

TAC §155.15, relating to Fees. The rulemaking is to correct an<br />

error in the fee table for 31 TAC §155.15(b)(1)(C)(iii), relating to<br />

rents and fees for Category III residential use coastal easements.<br />

In addition, the rulemaking is to clarify an item in the fee table in<br />

31 TAC §155.15(b)(1)(C)(v), relating to rents and fees for cabin<br />

permits.<br />

Section 155.15(b)(1)(C)(iii) adds an item to the fee table clarifying<br />

that the fee for covered second levels, which currently may be<br />

applied to Category I residential use easements, may also be applied<br />

to Category III residential use coastal easements. Adding<br />

this item to the fee table for Category III residential use coastal<br />

easements will accurately reflect current Board policy regarding<br />

fees for second covered levels.<br />

Section 155.15(b)(1)(C)(v) deletes the fourth footnote in the fee<br />

table, which is an incorrect reference to an additional item <strong>of</strong> rent<br />

for cabin permits. The additional item <strong>of</strong> rent in this footnote is<br />

not part <strong>of</strong> current Board policy. Deleting the footnote will ensure<br />

that the fee table for cabin permits accurately reflects current<br />

Board policy and informs the public <strong>of</strong> the correct rents and fees<br />

for such permits.<br />

Rene Truan, Deputy Commissioner for the General Land Office's<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Services Program Area, has determined that for<br />

each year <strong>of</strong> the first five years the amended section as proposed<br />

is in effect there will be no additional cost to state or local government<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> enforcing or administering the amended<br />

section.<br />

Mr. Truan has determined that for each year <strong>of</strong> the first five years<br />

the amendments as proposed are in effect the public will benefit<br />

from the proposed amendments because the General Land<br />

Office will be able to administer the coastal public land program<br />

more efficiently, providing the public more certainty and clarity in<br />

the process. Mr. Truan has also determined that it is unlikely<br />

that there will be an identifiable increase in economic costs to<br />

persons and business required to comply, as the amendments<br />

are consistent with current Board policy.<br />

PROPOSED RULES <strong>March</strong> <strong>22</strong>, 2013 38 TexReg 1951

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!