20.07.2014 Views

PEOPLE with PULL - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's ...

PEOPLE with PULL - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's ...

PEOPLE with PULL - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Spectrum</strong> . <strong>Redwood</strong> <strong>City's</strong> Monthly <strong>Magazine</strong><br />

As I Was Saying...<br />

By<br />

Steve Penna<br />

Publisher<br />

City Council watchers are wondering if the<br />

recent friendship between member Jim<br />

Hartnett and Vice Mayor Roseanne Fouts<br />

will result in some sort of block voting on issues<br />

that come before them. When I first heard about<br />

this concern, I immediately thought it was no one’s<br />

business whom council members are friends <strong>with</strong><br />

let alone to speculate on whether ones are dating.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re have been council members through the years<br />

that have had fantastic friendships – Dick Claire and<br />

Judy Buchan, Claire and Hartnett, Colleen Jordan<br />

and Matt Leipzig, Diane Howard and Barbara<br />

Pierce, Bob Bury and Bill Stangle, Georgie LaBerge<br />

and Jack Greenalch, and given that I never heard anyone<br />

question the issue of block voting <strong>with</strong> them, it left<br />

me wondering, why now?<br />

If you look at their voting records you will find that<br />

since Fouts joined the council in 2003 she and<br />

Hartnett have over 90 percent of the time voted in unison.<br />

I would imagine that they did so because they<br />

agree on the direction they must take to improve the<br />

quality of their community’s lives. Nothing more,<br />

nothing less.<br />

So why am I writing about this issue? Because given<br />

the fact that there is concern, no matter how small it<br />

is, the issue needs discussion. But as far as I am<br />

concerned, given the two persons involved, our<br />

community should rest assured that they will continue<br />

to be individual voices/votes on the council and any<br />

concerns that suggest otherwise, no matter how well<br />

intended they are, should be put to rest.<br />

* * * *<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a behind-the-scenes effort being waged to rally<br />

the City Council and have the community square in<br />

front of the Old County Courthouse (or another<br />

appropriate venue) named Uccelli Square in honor of<br />

Pete Uccelli who passed away late last year. A group of<br />

community-minded persons – which I am proud to be<br />

a part of – has been meeting and gathering support<br />

and will approach the City Council in the next couple<br />

of weeks to present the idea.<br />

But I am hearing chatter that the city might be looking<br />

for that big donor to name the square after. Consider<br />

the possibilities – Oracle Optical Square? Electronic<br />

Arts (Electric Center)? Starbucks Coffee (Caffeine<br />

Circle)? All seem quite ridiculous and naming the<br />

square after anything besides someone who has given<br />

to our community is too.<br />

* * * *<br />

As we went to press, the Planning Commission was<br />

holding a public hearing about revamping the zoning<br />

(continued on page 28)<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!