PEOPLE with PULL - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's ...
PEOPLE with PULL - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's ...
PEOPLE with PULL - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Spectrum</strong> . <strong>Redwood</strong> <strong>City's</strong> Monthly <strong>Magazine</strong><br />
As I Was Saying...<br />
By<br />
Steve Penna<br />
Publisher<br />
City Council watchers are wondering if the<br />
recent friendship between member Jim<br />
Hartnett and Vice Mayor Roseanne Fouts<br />
will result in some sort of block voting on issues<br />
that come before them. When I first heard about<br />
this concern, I immediately thought it was no one’s<br />
business whom council members are friends <strong>with</strong><br />
let alone to speculate on whether ones are dating.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re have been council members through the years<br />
that have had fantastic friendships – Dick Claire and<br />
Judy Buchan, Claire and Hartnett, Colleen Jordan<br />
and Matt Leipzig, Diane Howard and Barbara<br />
Pierce, Bob Bury and Bill Stangle, Georgie LaBerge<br />
and Jack Greenalch, and given that I never heard anyone<br />
question the issue of block voting <strong>with</strong> them, it left<br />
me wondering, why now?<br />
If you look at their voting records you will find that<br />
since Fouts joined the council in 2003 she and<br />
Hartnett have over 90 percent of the time voted in unison.<br />
I would imagine that they did so because they<br />
agree on the direction they must take to improve the<br />
quality of their community’s lives. Nothing more,<br />
nothing less.<br />
So why am I writing about this issue? Because given<br />
the fact that there is concern, no matter how small it<br />
is, the issue needs discussion. But as far as I am<br />
concerned, given the two persons involved, our<br />
community should rest assured that they will continue<br />
to be individual voices/votes on the council and any<br />
concerns that suggest otherwise, no matter how well<br />
intended they are, should be put to rest.<br />
* * * *<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a behind-the-scenes effort being waged to rally<br />
the City Council and have the community square in<br />
front of the Old County Courthouse (or another<br />
appropriate venue) named Uccelli Square in honor of<br />
Pete Uccelli who passed away late last year. A group of<br />
community-minded persons – which I am proud to be<br />
a part of – has been meeting and gathering support<br />
and will approach the City Council in the next couple<br />
of weeks to present the idea.<br />
But I am hearing chatter that the city might be looking<br />
for that big donor to name the square after. Consider<br />
the possibilities – Oracle Optical Square? Electronic<br />
Arts (Electric Center)? Starbucks Coffee (Caffeine<br />
Circle)? All seem quite ridiculous and naming the<br />
square after anything besides someone who has given<br />
to our community is too.<br />
* * * *<br />
As we went to press, the Planning Commission was<br />
holding a public hearing about revamping the zoning<br />
(continued on page 28)<br />
9