20.07.2014 Views

Service League - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's Monthly ...

Service League - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's Monthly ...

Service League - The Spectrum Magazine - Redwood City's Monthly ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Parties Around Town<br />

Thank you for being supportive<br />

of our restaurant.<br />

Please be our guest to celebrate<br />

New Kapadokia’s fifth anniversary.<br />

Cocktails at 6 p.m.<br />

Dinner at 7:30 p.m.<br />

P.S. Please let us know<br />

if you can attend.<br />

August 17, 2008<br />

Owners: Meral Güvenç & Celal Alpay<br />

2399 Broadway St.<br />

<strong>Redwood</strong> City<br />

Telephone 650-368-5500<br />

www.newkapadokia.com<br />

Public Will Give Input Into <strong>Redwood</strong> City Jail Site<br />

County staff expect to have a short list of possible<br />

sites for a new jail by the end of the year and hold<br />

at least three different forums in the fall to hear<br />

from the public, many of whom have made it quite<br />

clear they do not want such a facility in <strong>Redwood</strong> City.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Board of Supervisors’ recent opposition to<br />

a <strong>Redwood</strong> City initiative crimping development<br />

on land deemed open space threw a new wrench<br />

into the debate over location. If the county can’t<br />

unload the current jail site on Maple Street in<br />

<strong>Redwood</strong> City, the supervisors surmised at their<br />

last meeting, the jail will undoubtedly be rebuilt<br />

on the land. <strong>The</strong> parcel is untouchable as county<br />

land but if sold to another party would be affected<br />

by the initiative if it passes.<br />

As a result, the county fears the land would not<br />

bring in the bids, or the profit, needed to relocate<br />

the jail to a new location.<br />

<strong>The</strong> argument over the jail location turned into<br />

a public war of words between <strong>Redwood</strong> City and<br />

San Mateo County. Other issues — particularly<br />

the charter change initiative — have since pushed<br />

it out of public view, but the discussion is very<br />

much alive.<br />

County staff are currently outlining objective<br />

criteria to rank the options and should head back<br />

to the Board of Supervisors later this year with a<br />

winnowed list, Board President Adrienne Tissier<br />

wrote in an Aug. 5 update to the <strong>Redwood</strong> City<br />

Council.<br />

Specific dates aren’t yet set, but the goal is to<br />

set the meeting up in the north, central and south<br />

county, said county spokesman Marshall Wilson.<br />

Any public hearing is expected to be<br />

particularly watched in the southern portion of the<br />

county because that is where the current women’s<br />

and men’s facilities are currently located. Coupled<br />

with the possibility of the <strong>Redwood</strong> City land<br />

initiative passing, the discussion over the new<br />

jail location could ask residents to prioritize the<br />

issues.<br />

Timing is critical to building a new jail because<br />

of rising construction costs. <strong>The</strong> current $140<br />

million price tag could balloon to $180 million<br />

by 2012 if the county doesn’t act quickly for the<br />

planned five-story building.<br />

<strong>The</strong> state denied the county’s application for<br />

up to $100 million in funding toward a new<br />

facility, leaving the county faced with traditional<br />

financing options like bonds. Purchasing land<br />

rather than reusing the Maple Street site increases<br />

the price tag.<br />

<strong>The</strong> push for a jail is not a new issue but took<br />

on new life earlier this year when the supervisors<br />

considered buying the former Cemex parcel<br />

near the current facility. <strong>The</strong> land, at 1402–1450<br />

Maple St., is less than 1,000 feet away from<br />

the already-approved 800-unit Peninsula Park<br />

mixed-use development. <strong>The</strong> developer reportedly<br />

grew incensed at the idea of a new multi-story<br />

jail so near and threatened to pull out of the<br />

project. <strong>The</strong> council in turn directed its wrath at<br />

the county, accusing officials of jeopardizing its<br />

hard-earned redevelopment plans and making<br />

decisions without input from either the council or<br />

the community. A grassroots group of opponents<br />

established www.nonewjails.com and continues<br />

pushing back at the idea of a new or bigger<br />

facility in their backyard.<br />

Ultimately, the negotiations fell through and<br />

Cemex came off the table. <strong>The</strong> county has since<br />

said it was not trying to make deals without public<br />

consideration.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Spectrum</strong> 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!