20.07.2014 Views

disposition of case by unpublished memorandum decision

disposition of case by unpublished memorandum decision

disposition of case by unpublished memorandum decision

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DISPOSITION OF CASE BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM DECISION<br />

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA<br />

INDIANA RULES OF PROCEDURE, APPELLATE RULE 15(A)(3) AND APPELLATE RULE 65(D) PROVIDES:<br />

Appellate Rule 15(A)(3) - effective prior to January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless specifically designated ‘for publication’, <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong>s shall not be published nor shall they be regarded as precedent nor cited<br />

before any court except for purposes <strong>of</strong> establishing the defense <strong>of</strong> Res Judicata, collateral estoppel or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Appellate Rule 65(D) – effective January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless later designated for publication, a not-for-publication <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong> shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited to any<br />

court except <strong>by</strong> the parties to the <strong>case</strong> to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

William Beever<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

NAME OF THE CASE CAUSE NUMBER DATE JUDGES DISPOSITION<br />

49A02-0510-CR-1017 5-22-06 Barnes, J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Mathias, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Greenpoint Credit, LLC<br />

v.<br />

Roger Morgan and Becky Morgan<br />

Oran K. Marshall<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Douglas G. Murray<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Shane Nelson<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana in Relation to George<br />

Wetzel and Reba Richhart<br />

v.<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Commissioners <strong>of</strong> Noble<br />

County, Mark L. Pankop, et al<br />

Bryan E. Campbell<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

13A01-0506-CV-291<br />

27A02-0511-CR-1073<br />

79A02-0512-CR-1226<br />

45A04-0511-CR-685<br />

57A03-0509-CV-477<br />

23A05-0505-CR-298<br />

5-22-06 Barnes, J.<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

Mathias, J.<br />

5-22-06 Sharpnack, J.<br />

Najam, J.<br />

Robb, J.<br />

5-22-06 Najam, J.<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Robb, J.<br />

5-22-06 Barnes, J.<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

Mathias, J.<br />

5-23-06 Riley, J.<br />

Vaidik, J.<br />

Darden, J.<br />

5-23-06 Robb, J.<br />

Vaidik, J.<br />

Mathias, J.<br />

Reversed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed and Remanded<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed/Reversed/Remanded<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs


DISPOSITION OF CASE BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM DECISION<br />

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA<br />

INDIANA RULES OF PROCEDURE, APPELLATE RULE 15(A)(3) AND APPELLATE RULE 65(D) PROVIDES:<br />

Appellate Rule 15(A)(3) - effective prior to January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless specifically designated ‘for publication’, <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong>s shall not be published nor shall they be regarded as precedent nor cited<br />

before any court except for purposes <strong>of</strong> establishing the defense <strong>of</strong> Res Judicata, collateral estoppel or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Appellate Rule 65(D) – effective January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless later designated for publication, a not-for-publication <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong> shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited to any<br />

court except <strong>by</strong> the parties to the <strong>case</strong> to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Anthony Brown<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Monty Ferbert<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

NAME OF THE CASE CAUSE NUMBER DATE JUDGES DISPOSITION<br />

49A05-0508-CR-438 5-23-06 Garrard, Sr. J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Crone, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Kenda (Thompson) Marsh<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Anthony A. Hester<br />

v.<br />

Mary J. Hester<br />

Lori A. Reynolds<br />

v.<br />

Review Bd. Of the Indiana Dept. <strong>of</strong><br />

Workforce Development and Middle<br />

Way House, Inc.<br />

Chris Stapleton<br />

v.<br />

Guarantee Title & Trust<br />

Virginia Octavia Robbins<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

49A02-0510-CR-1013<br />

39A01-0506-CR-241<br />

39A01-0512-CV-578<br />

93A02-0504-EX-342<br />

5-23-06 Robb, J.<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Najam, J.<br />

5-23-06 Darden, J.<br />

Kirsch, C.J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

5-23-06 Darden, J.<br />

Riley, J.<br />

Vaidik, J.<br />

5-23-06 Darden, J.<br />

Riley, J.<br />

Vaidik, J.<br />

49A05-0505-CV-290 5-23-06 H<strong>of</strong>fman, Sr. J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

Darden, J.<br />

30A01-0601-CR-7 5-23-06 Robb, J.<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Najam, J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs


DISPOSITION OF CASE BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM DECISION<br />

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA<br />

INDIANA RULES OF PROCEDURE, APPELLATE RULE 15(A)(3) AND APPELLATE RULE 65(D) PROVIDES:<br />

Appellate Rule 15(A)(3) - effective prior to January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless specifically designated ‘for publication’, <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong>s shall not be published nor shall they be regarded as precedent nor cited<br />

before any court except for purposes <strong>of</strong> establishing the defense <strong>of</strong> Res Judicata, collateral estoppel or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Appellate Rule 65(D) – effective January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless later designated for publication, a not-for-publication <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong> shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited to any<br />

court except <strong>by</strong> the parties to the <strong>case</strong> to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

NAME OF THE CASE CAUSE NUMBER DATE JUDGES DISPOSITION<br />

82A01-0507-CV-319 5-23-06 Barteau, Sr. J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Darden, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Bailey, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Anthony L. Funke, M.D.<br />

v.<br />

Carol Kittinger<br />

James Andrew Royal<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Steven R. Swinford, Jr.<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

J.S.<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Craig Hartman<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Anthony T. Jones<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Daniel Aguiler-Valenzuera<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

17A03-0512-CR-595<br />

52A05-0511-CR-667<br />

49A02-0508-JV-687<br />

15A01-0509-CR-426<br />

18A02-0506-CR-539<br />

02A03-0512-PC-575<br />

5-23-06 Kirsch, C.J.<br />

Bailey, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

5-24-06 Baker, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

5-24-06 Baker, J.<br />

Najam, J.<br />

Bailey, J.<br />

5-24-06 Najam, J.<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Robb, J.<br />

5-24-06 Baker, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

5-24-06 Kirsch, C.J.<br />

Bailey, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed/Reversed/Remanded<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed and Remanded<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs as to Part III and concurs<br />

in result as to Parts I and II.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs


DISPOSITION OF CASE BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM DECISION<br />

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA<br />

INDIANA RULES OF PROCEDURE, APPELLATE RULE 15(A)(3) AND APPELLATE RULE 65(D) PROVIDES:<br />

Appellate Rule 15(A)(3) - effective prior to January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless specifically designated ‘for publication’, <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong>s shall not be published nor shall they be regarded as precedent nor cited<br />

before any court except for purposes <strong>of</strong> establishing the defense <strong>of</strong> Res Judicata, collateral estoppel or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Appellate Rule 65(D) – effective January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless later designated for publication, a not-for-publication <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong> shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited to any<br />

court except <strong>by</strong> the parties to the <strong>case</strong> to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

NAME OF THE CASE CAUSE NUMBER DATE JUDGES DISPOSITION<br />

10A04-0506-CR-356 5-25-06 Mathias, J.<br />

Affirmed and Remanded<br />

Robb, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Vaidik, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Jeffrey D. Thomasson<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Rick Hollenback<br />

v.<br />

Jamie Mullin-Hollenback<br />

S.H.<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Jason Heilman<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Percy L. Cos<strong>by</strong><br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

David Hanson<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Raymond Thompson<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Kendra Campbell<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

33A04-0510-CV-583<br />

49A02-0509-JV-898<br />

82A04-0509-CR-555<br />

89A01-0510-CR-440<br />

34A02-0512-CR-1228<br />

45A05-0507-CR-394<br />

04A03-0508-CR-362<br />

5-25-06 Kirsch, C.J.<br />

Bailey, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

5-25-06 Baker, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

5-25-06 Baker, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

5-25-06 Robertson, Sr. J.<br />

Vaidik, J.<br />

Bailey, J.<br />

5-25-06 Baker, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

5-25-06 Vaidik, J.<br />

Darden, J.<br />

Riley, J.<br />

5-25-06 Sharpnack, J.<br />

Najam, J.<br />

Robb, J.<br />

Reversed and Remanded<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Dissents with opinion<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Dissents with opinion<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Appeal Dismissed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs


DISPOSITION OF CASE BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM DECISION<br />

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA<br />

INDIANA RULES OF PROCEDURE, APPELLATE RULE 15(A)(3) AND APPELLATE RULE 65(D) PROVIDES:<br />

Appellate Rule 15(A)(3) - effective prior to January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless specifically designated ‘for publication’, <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong>s shall not be published nor shall they be regarded as precedent nor cited<br />

before any court except for purposes <strong>of</strong> establishing the defense <strong>of</strong> Res Judicata, collateral estoppel or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Appellate Rule 65(D) – effective January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless later designated for publication, a not-for-publication <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong> shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited to any<br />

court except <strong>by</strong> the parties to the <strong>case</strong> to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Michael Campbell<br />

v.<br />

Victoria Campbell<br />

Anthony Wilson<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Larry Rowley<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Marvin E. Smith<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Jerome Williams<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

NAME OF THE CASE CAUSE NUMBER DATE JUDGES DISPOSITION<br />

85A02-0601-CV-3 5-25-06 Baker, J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

May, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Paul Glasscock<br />

v.<br />

Grant County Sheriff, and Town<br />

Manager for the Town <strong>of</strong> Swayzee<br />

Larry M. Jansen<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

49A02-0504-CR-313<br />

89A01-0508-CR-339<br />

49A05-0507-CR-406<br />

34A02-0508-CR-761<br />

27A02-0506-CV-523<br />

40A01-0511-CR-516<br />

5-25-06 Barteau, Sr. J.<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Robb, J.<br />

5-26-06 Baker, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

5-26-06 Friedlander, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

5-26-06 Najam, J.<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Robb, J.<br />

5-26-06 Friedlander, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

5-26-06 Baker, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

Appeal Dismissed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs


DISPOSITION OF CASE BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM DECISION<br />

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA<br />

INDIANA RULES OF PROCEDURE, APPELLATE RULE 15(A)(3) AND APPELLATE RULE 65(D) PROVIDES:<br />

Appellate Rule 15(A)(3) - effective prior to January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless specifically designated ‘for publication’, <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong>s shall not be published nor shall they be regarded as precedent nor cited<br />

before any court except for purposes <strong>of</strong> establishing the defense <strong>of</strong> Res Judicata, collateral estoppel or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Appellate Rule 65(D) – effective January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless later designated for publication, a not-for-publication <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong> shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited to any<br />

court except <strong>by</strong> the parties to the <strong>case</strong> to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

NAME OF THE CASE CAUSE NUMBER DATE JUDGES DISPOSITION<br />

67A01-0506-CV-276 5-26-06 Najam, J.<br />

Reversed<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Robb, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Bruce and Wendie Johnson<br />

v.<br />

Heritage Lake Property Owners Assoc.<br />

Anthony Pacheco<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Rodney Miller<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Donald Murray<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Berry Metal Co., John A. Barbus and<br />

Barry Ziegler<br />

v.<br />

Randy Myers<br />

Tammy G. Carr<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Kenneth Rottman<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

49A02-0505-CR-442<br />

49A05-0510-CR-606<br />

49A05-0509-CR-517<br />

45A03-0507-CV-324<br />

03A01-0510-CR-457<br />

64A03-0506-CR-299<br />

5-26-06 Friedlander, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

5-26-06 Crone, J.<br />

Kirsch, C.J.<br />

Bailey, J.<br />

5-26-06 Barnes, J.<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

Mathias, J.<br />

5-26-06 Baker, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

5-26-06 Najam, J.<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Robb, J.<br />

5-26-06 Friedlander, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs in result<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs


DISPOSITION OF CASE BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM DECISION<br />

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA<br />

INDIANA RULES OF PROCEDURE, APPELLATE RULE 15(A)(3) AND APPELLATE RULE 65(D) PROVIDES:<br />

Appellate Rule 15(A)(3) - effective prior to January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless specifically designated ‘for publication’, <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong>s shall not be published nor shall they be regarded as precedent nor cited<br />

before any court except for purposes <strong>of</strong> establishing the defense <strong>of</strong> Res Judicata, collateral estoppel or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Appellate Rule 65(D) – effective January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless later designated for publication, a not-for-publication <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong> shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited to any<br />

court except <strong>by</strong> the parties to the <strong>case</strong> to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

NAME OF THE CASE CAUSE NUMBER DATE JUDGES DISPOSITION<br />

71A03-0511-CR-541 5-26-06 Barnes, J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Mathias, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Robert L. Spann, Jr.<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Will O. Holloway<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Steven Longjohn<br />

v.<br />

Amy Longjohn<br />

Michael Lee Fultz<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

In the Matter <strong>of</strong> C.M.<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Larry Lillard<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Joseph B. Williams<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Harold S. Mapp<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

71A04-0511-CR-665<br />

34A04-0512-CV-712<br />

53A01-0410-CR-456<br />

92A04-0512-JV-709<br />

49A02-0509-CR-868<br />

43A05-0508-CR-461<br />

48A02-0410-PC-890<br />

5-26-06 Baker, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

5-26-06 Najam, J.<br />

Sharpnack, J.<br />

Robb, J.<br />

5-26-06 Friedlander, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

Vaidik, J.<br />

5-26-06 Baker, J.<br />

Sullivan, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

5-26-06 Crone, J.<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

May, J.<br />

5-26-06 May, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

5-26-06 May, J.<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs in result w/ sep. opinion<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed/Reversed/Remanded<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs


DISPOSITION OF CASE BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM DECISION<br />

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA<br />

INDIANA RULES OF PROCEDURE, APPELLATE RULE 15(A)(3) AND APPELLATE RULE 65(D) PROVIDES:<br />

Appellate Rule 15(A)(3) - effective prior to January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless specifically designated ‘for publication’, <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong>s shall not be published nor shall they be regarded as precedent nor cited<br />

before any court except for purposes <strong>of</strong> establishing the defense <strong>of</strong> Res Judicata, collateral estoppel or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Appellate Rule 65(D) – effective January 1, 2001<br />

“Unless later designated for publication, a not-for-publication <strong>memorandum</strong> <strong>decision</strong> shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited to any<br />

court except <strong>by</strong> the parties to the <strong>case</strong> to establish res judicata, collateral estoppel, or law <strong>of</strong> the <strong>case</strong>.”<br />

Dallas Washington<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

Robert Paul<br />

v.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> Indiana<br />

NAME OF THE CASE CAUSE NUMBER DATE JUDGES DISPOSITION<br />

49A05-0503-PC-118 5-26-06 May, J.<br />

Reversed and Remanded<br />

Kirsch, C.J.<br />

Concurs<br />

Robb, J.<br />

Concurs<br />

34A02-0508-CR-762<br />

5-26-06 May, J.<br />

Friedlander, J.<br />

Crone, J.<br />

Affirmed<br />

Concurs<br />

Concurs<br />

*** TAX COURT ***<br />

Mike T. & Angela Lazo, et al<br />

v.<br />

Dept. <strong>of</strong> Local Government Finance<br />

45T10-0512-TA-96 5-25-06 Fisher, J. Dismissed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!