20.07.2014 Views

Published Order Dismissing Appeal - The Indiana Law Blog

Published Order Dismissing Appeal - The Indiana Law Blog

Published Order Dismissing Appeal - The Indiana Law Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Star's ,Motion to Stay Enforcement of October 19, 2012 <strong>Order</strong> and to Amend <strong>Order</strong> to<br />

Provide Required Security at 2.<br />

On November 15, <strong>The</strong> Star filed its Motion to Stay <strong>Order</strong> Compelling<br />

Identification of Anonymous Speaker Pending <strong>Appeal</strong> in this court. We granted <strong>The</strong><br />

Star's motion until we could consider the parties' arguments. Having held oral argument<br />

and having reviewed and considered the parties' written submissions, for the reasons<br />

explained below we conclude that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over <strong>The</strong><br />

Star's appeal.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Overview<br />

This court's subject matter jurisdiction is specified by the <strong>Indiana</strong> Rules of<br />

Appellate Procedure adopted by our Supreme Court. See Ind. Const. art. VII, § 6. "<strong>The</strong><br />

question of subject matter jurisdiction entails a determination of whether a court has<br />

jurisdiction over the general class of actions to which a particular case belongs." Troxel<br />

v. Troxel, 737 N.E.2d 745, 749 (Ind. 2000).<br />

Whether [ an] order was a final judgment governs the appellate courts'<br />

subject matter jurisdiction, and unlike most contentions, lack of [subject<br />

matter] jurisdiction is not waived by the parties. Neither the parties nor the<br />

trial court can confer appellate jurisdiction over an order that is not<br />

appealable either as a final judgment or under Trial Rule 54(B). To the<br />

contrary, the lack of appellate jurisdiction can be raised at any time, and if<br />

the parties do not question subject matter jurisdiction, the appellate court<br />

may consider the issue sua sponte.<br />

Georgos v. Jackson, 790 N.E.2d 448,451 (Ind. 2003) (citing Albright v. Pyle, 637 N.E.2d<br />

1360, 1363 (Ind. ct. App. 1994)).<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!