Download PDF - SRI International
Download PDF - SRI International
Download PDF - SRI International
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Task 1: One industry expert stated the material present a somewhat idealized view of meetings and<br />
team communication.<br />
Task 2: Three general comments from industry experts were presented, such as “use googledocs to<br />
share data.” Four additional experts agreed that “the topic is too basic,” and students need to know<br />
how to use the tools but also be able to explain how they work.”<br />
Task 3: Two industry experts wrote that they don’t do work as presented in Task 3, and didn’t find<br />
it relevant to bioinformatics skills. However, three other industry experts commented that it was a<br />
relevant task, particularly because the student learned data extraction, analysis, interpretation, and<br />
reporting.<br />
Task 4: The three industry experts who responded agreed that the task was well presented and<br />
“ideal in my research.”<br />
Research Question 4 Findings<br />
To what extent do the SBL-Bioinformatics instructional and assessment materials<br />
provide students with an opportunity to learn the knowledge and skills<br />
in a standard bioinformatics or biology curriculum?<br />
Only education experts (N = 13) reviewed instructional materials to address this question. Their<br />
responses to address this question for the assessment question were also analyzed. Both sets of<br />
summary statistics appear in Table 12. After providing ratings, the education experts described<br />
the reasons for their responses for the instructional materials, summarized below the table. The<br />
education experts’ comments regarding the ratings of the assessments were captured in the<br />
summary in the above section regarding research question 2.<br />
To summarize, education experts viewed Task 4 as most likely to offer an opportunity to learn the<br />
knowledge and skills relevant to their curriculum, followed by Tasks 2, 3, and 1. But their review<br />
of the assessments differed. The education experts rated Task 1’s assessment as most focused<br />
on measuring high-level curriculum-relevant skills, followed by Task 4, 2, and 3. They saw Task<br />
1’s assessment as most focused on measuring content knowledge relevant to their curriculum,<br />
followed by Task 4, 2, and 3.<br />
© 2011 <strong>SRI</strong> INTERNATIONAL 21