Secure Implementation Experiments: Do Strategy-proof Mechanisms ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

150 135 120 105 90 75 60 Frequency 45 30 15 25 22 19 Type 2 16 13 10 7 4 1 1 3 5 7 0 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Type 1 Figure 5: Treatment S -- All Pairs Choices
Percent Playing Dominant Strategy 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Treatment S Treatment P 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Period Figure 6: Rates that Individuals Play Dominant Strategies
Page 1 and 2: Secure Implementation Experiments:
Page 3 and 4: 1. Introduction Strategy-proofness,
Page 5 and 6: preferences are single-peaked (wher
Page 7 and 8: 2. Experimental Results on Strategy
Page 9 and 10: less than 10 percent of the bids re
Page 11 and 12: Second, let ( v , v ) = ( , ) be th
Page 13 and 14: g g g g 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 v (
Page 15 and 16: Theorem 1. An SCF is securely imple
Page 17 and 18: ----------------------------------
Page 19 and 20: on her own choices, she did not kno
Page 21 and 22: Let the strategy space of each type
Page 23 and 24: After deciding which number she cho
Page 25 and 26: strategy equilibria. Table 8 of ove
Page 27 and 28: This is likely to have reduced the
Page 29 and 30: (a) Individuals play dominant strat
Page 31 and 32: the pivotal mechanism has Nash equi
Page 33 and 34: Treatment S is both secure and supe
Page 35 and 36: Gibbard, A., 1973. Manipulation of
Page 37 and 38: Agent 2 7 5 Bad Nash area true valu
Page 39: 35 30 25 20 15 Frequency 10 5 25 22
Page 43 and 44: P1 The number which you choose (Typ
Page 45 and 46: Dominant Strategy Equilibrium Good
Page 47 and 48: Dominant Strategy Equilibrium Good
Page 49 and 50: Payoff Table (for the Actual Experi
Page 51: (1) (2) Dummy variable=1 for Treatm

Secure Implementation Experiments: Do Strategy-proof Mechanisms ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?