28.07.2014 Views

Background Information - Student Action for Refugees

Background Information - Student Action for Refugees

Background Information - Student Action for Refugees

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Action</strong> Week<br />

18-24 February 2013<br />

In Britain we have a long, proud history of protecting people fleeing persecution and preventing the<br />

detention of those who have done nothing wrong. The detention of asylum seekers goes against<br />

both of these traditions.<br />

It is wrong to lock up people who are fleeing persecution as soon as they arrive in the UK. The UK<br />

has signed the UN Convention on <strong>Refugees</strong> and there<strong>for</strong>e it's perfectly legal to claim asylum.<br />

It Doesn’t Work<br />

The asylum process is supposed to examine the facts<br />

put by the person asking <strong>for</strong> protection and grant<br />

refugee status to those who need it.<br />

DFT is ineffective at finding out the true facts of an<br />

asylum case and punishes rather than protects those<br />

who need it.<br />

Stressful. It is really bad. There’s<br />

nothing I can do. I don’t even have a<br />

solicitor, and it is hard work to do<br />

everything myself. I am tired being here,<br />

I miss my kids so much. I cannot take it<br />

no more. Maybe that’s their plan, so<br />

that we can all give up on our life. This<br />

is torture now.<br />

-Mallan, from Malawi<br />

There is good evidence that a successful asylum<br />

system allows asylum seekers to live in the community,<br />

receive good legal advice and engage with the people<br />

making a decision on their claim. This was trialled in 2008 under a programme called the Solihull<br />

Pilot and found that:<br />

Cases were concluded almost twice as quickly as those elsewhere.<br />

Better, more sustainable decisions meant that the number of allowed appeals was halved.<br />

“Considerable potential savings” were identified. The lower rate of allowed appeals meant that<br />

the rise in the Legal Aid budget could be offset by significant savings in UKBA support, Legal<br />

Service Commission funds and Tribunal costs.<br />

The number of people absconding reduced significantly.<br />

The rate of grants of refugee status almost doubled.<br />

The number of removals (as a proportion of refusals) increased.<br />

In Australia asylum seekers who in the past would have been detained are now living in the<br />

community and provided with case management support. For people who are refused asylum, the<br />

number agreeing to leave voluntarily has increased dramatically.<br />

It Harms Vulnerable People<br />

The screening process to decide who is put into Detained Fast Track is very short, public and<br />

ineffective and leads to vulnerable people being locked up.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!