01.08.2014 Views

take your pick - Stay Free!

take your pick - Stay Free!

take your pick - Stay Free!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>take</strong> <strong>your</strong> <strong>pick</strong><br />

Unlike other magazines, <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! is created for readers, not advertisers. That’s why we beg for<br />

money. Subscriptions to <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! are $10.95 for three issues (or $6.95 for digital issues) and include<br />

invitations to <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! events, internet-only updates, and the joy (not to mention the good karma)<br />

that comes with supporting independent publishing. You can pay by credit card on our website,<br />

www.stayfreemagazine.org. Or send a check to <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! 390 Butler Street, Brooklyn, NY 11217. We<br />

gladly accept (tax-deductible!) donations at this address as well.<br />

buy stuff online at www.stayfreemagazine.org<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>!—The REAL magazine


14 24<br />

40<br />

G E N E R A L I N T E R E S T B R O O K L Y N<br />

12<br />

Eyesore of the Month<br />

When fake charitable clothing boxes invaded<br />

Brooklyn, our intrepid reporter repurposed<br />

them.<br />

23<br />

The Windsor Terrorist<br />

A local teen is mis<strong>take</strong>n for one of al Qaeda’s.<br />

24<br />

COVER STORY<br />

Interview with Jake Greene, a homeless man<br />

who has been in Park Slope longer than you.<br />

4<br />

Introduction<br />

14<br />

The Trouble with Wal-Mart<br />

Whatever you’ve heard about the retail giant,<br />

it’s a lot worse than you think. Interview with<br />

journalist Liza Featherstone.<br />

32<br />

Pricing the Priceless<br />

How much would you pay for a case of chronic<br />

bronchitis? What is a hunchback whale worth?<br />

Frank Ackerman and Lisa Heinzerling discuss the<br />

sordid world of cost-benefit analysis.<br />

40<br />

Volkswagen: The Vehicle for Comparison<br />

Chris Boznos ponders the rapid spread of a<br />

curious new measuring stick.<br />

28<br />

Eugene Mirman<br />

The local comic talks about his native Russia,<br />

temping, and surviving the comedy biz.<br />

44<br />

The Mouse That Whored<br />

Chuck E. Cheese has hit Brooklyn, but is it the<br />

borough’s newest fun spot or the latest scar of<br />

gentrification?<br />

46<br />

It’s No Moon River<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! <strong>take</strong>s a canoe trip down the Gowanus.<br />

culture and politics for brooklyn and beyond<br />

48<br />

Flavor Makers<br />

A couple of former factory workers talk about<br />

non-blueberry blueberries, the dangers of<br />

peppermint oil, and why you really, really don’t<br />

want to spill the diacetyl<br />

54<br />

Reel People<br />

Chances are those old Laurel & Hardy prints<br />

sitting in <strong>your</strong> basement aren’t nearly as valuable<br />

as <strong>your</strong> mom’s home movies. The founders of<br />

Home Movie Day talk about amateur films and<br />

what they can teach us.<br />

60<br />

My New Favorite Thing<br />

Music, books, and other items we fancy<br />

65<br />

Fake classifieds


Change is good<br />

. . . or at least it better be, because I have<br />

more than my share this issue (#23). Yes, this is the first Brooklyn issue, meaning two<br />

things: the magazine now includes multiple references to the place where it is made,<br />

and many people in that place will be <strong>pick</strong>ing up <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! for the first time. <strong>Stay</strong><br />

<strong>Free</strong>! has long been sold in book and record stores across the U.S. and Canada, but<br />

now it’s also available in local shops and cafés in what we’re calling South Central<br />

(Brooklyn, that is): Prospect Heights, Park Slope, Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, and<br />

Boerum Hill.<br />

What does this mean for the magazine’s content? <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! will continue to do the<br />

same sort of cultural criticism we’ve always done. We still have the same enemies:<br />

nefarious corporations, greedy politicians, hidden persuaders, and SUVs. But we’ll<br />

also be covering the people and places that make our neighborhoods alive. I suspect<br />

that we can do this without alienating our national subscribers, and—just to be<br />

sure—I’ve added eight pages to the magazine for local stuff instead of cutting the<br />

usual, more nationally minded fare.<br />

Why go local? I’ve been wanting to do local coverage for years now, but publishing<br />

a separate magazine about Brooklyn would never work. One zine is eccentric, two<br />

is insane. I don’t have a trust fund, after all, and I need to pay rent. At the same<br />

time, taking <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! local makes economic sense. National distribution has been<br />

giving me ulcers. I recently had to cut ties with our largest distributor, which has<br />

yet to pay <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! the $6,000 it owes. And, lately, selling advertising has been a<br />

struggle as well. The independent record labels that have long been our mainstay<br />

have suffered flagging sales. With local distribution, we can broaden our ad base with<br />

neighborhood businesses—and, with luck, still maintain our national advertisers.<br />

In many ways, this move toward the local is a return to our roots. I started publishing<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! as a free music zine in North Carolina 11 years ago. The only reason it<br />

went national is because I moved to New York and still felt like a southerner—it<br />

took me a while to find a new local community. Now I’ve been on the same odd little<br />

street on the western border of Park Slope for more than eight years, and at some<br />

point along the way this place became not just a neighborhood but my neighborhood.<br />

I love it, and I love Brooklyn, and hopefully Brooklyn will feel the same about <strong>Stay</strong><br />

<strong>Free</strong>! (You better!)<br />

Carrie McLaren<br />

October 17, 2004


EDITOR & ART DIRECTOR<br />

Carrie McLaren<br />

VICE PRESIDENTS<br />

Jason Torchinsky<br />

Alexandra Ringe<br />

Charles Star<br />

COPY CHIEF<br />

Emily Votruba<br />

COPY EDITORS AND PROOFREADERS<br />

Mike Janson<br />

Eva Pendleton<br />

Allison Miller<br />

Kris Kohler<br />

ASSOCIATE DESIGNER<br />

Noah Scalin<br />

ADVERTISING SALES<br />

Kavita Kulkarni<br />

TECH SUPPORT<br />

Ivan Drucker<br />

FRONT COVER<br />

Photo of Jake Greene: Sabrina Hartel<br />

Background and compositing: Carrie McLaren<br />

AMERICAN GENTRIFIER COVER<br />

Photo of Jeanne McCabe, Andrew Hearst and<br />

(baby) Jack Jewell by Om Rupani<br />

Hair and makeup by Emily Warren<br />

CONTRIBUTORS THIS ISSUE<br />

Marisa Bardach , Chris Boznos, Matthew Daniels,<br />

Jeff Faerber, Mikki Halpin, Tim Harrod, Francis Heaney,<br />

Claire Houston, Steven Joerg, Emily Pugh, Bridget<br />

Regan, Tamar Rothenberg, Jack Silbert<br />

THANKS<br />

Kevin Mullaney, Brooks & Patrick Jewell, Mark J. Fidel,<br />

Peter Bergin, Serena Norr<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! is a nonprofit magazine covering American<br />

culture, politics, and life in South Central Brooklyn.<br />

Though we have a 10-plus year history, this is our first<br />

Brooklyn issue. Back issues, postcards, and arcana can<br />

be found at www.stayfreemagazine.org. <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! will<br />

hereafter be published twice a year, in November and<br />

in May. We welcome outside contributors; just write a<br />

letter pitching <strong>your</strong> idea and send pertinent samples of<br />

<strong>your</strong> work. • <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! is distributed in book and record<br />

stores across the U.S. and Canada, as well as in eateries<br />

and shops throughout Prospect Heights, Boerum Hill,<br />

Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, and Park Slope, Brooklyn. If<br />

you do not see <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! at <strong>your</strong> local bookstore, please<br />

inquire within. For a list of distributors, see our website.<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! 390 Butler Street, Third Floor, Brooklyn, NY<br />

11217 • (718) 398-9324 • www.stayfreemagazine.org<br />

STAY FREE! 6 ISSUE NO. 23


ON THE STREET<br />

“ What do you think of when<br />

you think of Park Slope? ”<br />

STEVE DOLLAR<br />

Babies and mommies and strollers and kids<br />

out on the street screaming and blocking<br />

my way. That’s what I think of.<br />

EILEEN LADA<br />

I grew up here. All the new and up-andcoming<br />

things are nice, but to me they’re<br />

a real inconvenience. This was a beautiful<br />

neighborhood before; very family oriented.<br />

I mean, it’s still nice—don’t get me wrong—<br />

but you don’t see a lot of kids outside playing.<br />

If they’re outside in the evening, the<br />

poor kids are getting yelled at. It’s a lot different<br />

than what it used to be.<br />

NEAL WALKER<br />

I think of money, culture, beautiful brownstones.<br />

I see diversity, not just culturally but<br />

genderwise. And to me, it’s like the greatest<br />

village of Brooklyn.<br />

ADAM<br />

White people, except on 5th Avenue, where<br />

there’s more nonwhite people. And rich<br />

people and brownstones.<br />

LOUIS MANCO<br />

I’ve been here since 1951. This is a good<br />

neighborhood; it’s changed a lot. No<br />

more trouble, no more gangs. There used<br />

to be the Garfield Boys, the Tigers—back<br />

in the ’50s—but they all stopped. They<br />

used to all hang around in the restaurant<br />

up the block.<br />

DOLORES ORTALANO<br />

Park Slope is nice, but not compared to<br />

Bensonhurst. Bay Ridge is nice, too. Bay<br />

Ridge is like another village.<br />

PEDRO CHACON<br />

I just come here for work—I’ve been<br />

working here for about four months.<br />

What I’ve seen so far is . . . gays. Gay<br />

neighborhood. Lesbians, gays. You know,<br />

guys holding hands, girls holding hands,<br />

stuff like that.<br />

ARITA ALEXANDER<br />

It’s culturally diverse. I think of interracial<br />

couples and interracial children, feeling<br />

free because they’re not the only one in<br />

the neighborhood.<br />

ANITA<br />

It’s very family oriented. I think it’s pretty<br />

diverse. I don’t think I’ll ever be able to own<br />

a co-op or an apartment or a house here but<br />

I really love living here. I love being near the<br />

park and the shops and everything. Unfortunately,<br />

we’re moving; it’s so unaffordable<br />

and we’d like more space. We live in a small<br />

apartment, and if it was just my husband<br />

and I, it would be fine, but with the baby<br />

we’re so crowded.<br />

LEONARD BALDING<br />

I heard there were seven elderly people<br />

killed in traffic accidents on 7th Avenue.<br />

If you’re an elderly person and you’re<br />

going too slow, there’s a lot of cars that<br />

honk their horn, tell you to get off the<br />

road. They’re very discourteous. They<br />

don’t come from Park Slope, they come<br />

from somewhere else. They should have<br />

stricter laws and say that it’s murder to<br />

run over somebody using <strong>your</strong> vehicle.<br />

Interviews and photos by Steven Joerg<br />

STAY FREE! 7 ISSUE NO. 23


STAY FREE! X ISSUE NO. 23


Letters to the Editor ><br />

Igive this last issue of <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! a<br />

double thumbs down. Of course,<br />

you got my respect for <strong>pick</strong>ing a<br />

sufficiently bizarre issue (“eugenics and<br />

dog breeding”). But <strong>your</strong> interview with<br />

Daniel Kevles made eugenics look like a<br />

thing of the past. Not so. And I’m not<br />

just thinking about the usual suspects:<br />

sex selection of embryos or GMOs on<br />

the cornfield.<br />

Do you know any young people with<br />

Down syndrome? Nope? Guess why: prenatal<br />

testing. A friend of mine was encouraged<br />

to abort because the Down syndrome<br />

test (post-fourth-month) came out<br />

positive. When she refused, doctors told<br />

her she should not expect society to foot<br />

the health-care and special-education bill.<br />

It turned out that the disability was very<br />

slight—the appearance of an extra gene<br />

says little about the level of disability.<br />

In the issue, there was not a word<br />

about the sterilization of Native Americans.<br />

From 1970 to 1976, the Indian<br />

Health Service coerced Native American<br />

women into being sterilized, under the<br />

guise of “pregnancy counseling.”<br />

Looking through my stack of <strong>Stay</strong><br />

<strong>Free</strong>!’s, I think overall you spend too<br />

much time talking to white men. It’s not<br />

good for the head: makes one think white<br />

man thoughts. I know from experience.<br />

Yours most devotedly,<br />

Zenta<br />

Kyoto City, Japan<br />

Istumbled across <strong>your</strong> magazine on<br />

the internet. I’m glad, because I really<br />

like the articles, and I thought<br />

the Illegal Art Exhibit was great. Anyway,<br />

I thought you might like this picture of<br />

some ink of mine [below right]. I had it<br />

before I came across <strong>your</strong> magazine (it’s<br />

actually somewhat of a tribute to the<br />

Clash’s song); I thought it was so cool<br />

to see a whole magazine devoted to this<br />

thought. Keep up the great work.<br />

Gabriel Van Horn<br />

New Brighton, PA<br />

Regarding <strong>your</strong> article on subliminal<br />

advertising: I heard Bryan<br />

Wilson Key in 1974 at a conference<br />

in Toronto just after the publication<br />

of his controversial book Subliminal Seduction.<br />

It seems there were few skeptics<br />

in the audience. Why? Most of the<br />

academics were eager to believe his thesis.<br />

More interesting than that occasion was a<br />

public forum held in Toronto a year later<br />

involving Key and a bunch of guys from<br />

ad agencies. Again the public sided with<br />

Key. The crowd gasped as his slides revealed<br />

the many hidden (Freudian) messages.<br />

The ad people denounced it all as<br />

sheer hokum and affirmed that, at least in<br />

Canada, such things didn’t happen. One<br />

of them said, “If we thought this really<br />

worked, we would do it.”<br />

I met a teacher who had studied under<br />

Key at the University of Western Ontario.<br />

Apparently, if you didn’t find the<br />

subliminal messages in the ads that were<br />

handed out, you failed the course!<br />

Barry Duncan<br />

Toronto<br />

contributors<br />

Chris Boznos lives a few miles from Harvard, Illinois, “Milk Capital of the World” and the home of the Milk Day<br />

Queen, whom he hopes to marry someday. Francis Heaney is a puzzle writer, songwriter, and playwright. His humor<br />

book, Holy Tango of Literature (Emmis), is due out this fall. Mikki Halpin is the author of It’s Your World—If You<br />

Don’t Like It, Change It (Simon & Schuster Children’s). Tim Harrod has written for The Onion, The Late Show with David<br />

Letterman, and Star Wars Insider. He is getting better at the ukulele. Sabrina Hartel is a New York–based documentary<br />

and portrait photographer. Her work can be seen at www.SabrinaHartel.com. Mike Janson wants to know<br />

what that girl on the back cover is doing with that guy. Steven Joerg spent much of the past year producing Shrimp<br />

Boat’s Something Grand box set, which he considers to be one of the greatest collections of American music ever, and<br />

therefore gently urges you to buy a copy at www.aumfidelity.com. Kris Kohler works for the political action committee<br />

of a large construction union and moonlights as an aural landscape artist (“DJ”). Carrie McLaren publishes<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>!, works as a freelance web and graphic designer (visit www.carriemclaren.com), and little else, it seems.<br />

Emily Pugh is the drummer for sissy pop band the Mean Corner: www.thepirateship.org/themeancorner.htm. In her<br />

spare time she is getting a Ph.D. in art history. Alexandra Ringe has had the good fortune to live in the Olga—second<br />

only to the Mildred in Park Slope buildings with great names—since 1995. Tamar Rothenberg spends her days<br />

interrogating teenagers at New Youth Connections magazine. Om Rupani is a photographer who splits his time<br />

between searching for God and half-naked women. For half-naked women visit www.OmRupani.com. Jack Silbert<br />

is a writer and magazine editor residing in Hoboken, NJ. Charles Star is a standup comic living in Prospect Heights.<br />

He gets no press despite the Jews’ control of the media. Emily Votruba is the copy chief at Cargo magazine (Lucky<br />

for men), an editor for the Rubber Band Society Gazette, and she still gets emails from Howard Dean.<br />

STAY FREE! 9 ISSUE NO. 23


WORLD VIEW<br />

Organizers of the 2004 Olympics have<br />

warned spectators that they could be<br />

barred for taking a surreptitious sip of<br />

Pepsi or an illicit bite from a Burger King Whopper.<br />

Strict regulations published by Athens 2004<br />

dictated that spectators might be refused admission<br />

to events if they were carrying food or<br />

drinks made by companies that did not see fit to<br />

sponsor the games. Staff were also on the lookout<br />

for T-shirts, hats, and bags displaying the logos<br />

of nonsponsors. Known as the “clean venue<br />

policy,” the rules were drawn up by the Greeks<br />

and the International Olympic Committee (IOC)<br />

to shield sponsors from so-called “ambush marketing,”<br />

an attempt to advertise items during<br />

the games without paying sponsorship fees.<br />

The restrictions, which drew criticism from<br />

Amnesty International, were even harsher for<br />

the thousands of stewards and volunteers working<br />

at Athens 2004 who were supplied with uniforms<br />

but no shoes. “We [had] to provide our<br />

own shoes and we were told that we shouldn’t<br />

wear trainers with a bright logo from a sports<br />

brand which [was] not an official sponsor like<br />

Adidas,” said one. It was not even possible to<br />

buy a ticket to the Olympics using a credit card<br />

other than Visa, which paid more than $30 million<br />

for its exclusive rights. —Halifax Herald Limited,<br />

8/8/04<br />

* * *<br />

Two people were killed and 14 others injured<br />

in a stampede during the opening<br />

of a new Ikea in Saudi Arabia. The popular<br />

Swedish home furniture retailer had announced<br />

the opening of two new stores in Riyadh and Jeddah,<br />

advertising in the local press that customers<br />

who arrived first would receive special vouchers.<br />

“We were expecting 20,000 visitors during the<br />

whole day, but this number arrived even before<br />

opening,” an Ikea spokesperson in Jeddah said.<br />

—AFP Worldwide, 9/22/04<br />

From selected Amazon.com reviews of the<br />

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental<br />

Disorders (DSM-IV and DSM-IV-TR):<br />

“The DSM . . . is complete fiction. Psychiatric “diseases”<br />

are VOTED into existence by a panel of<br />

about 1,000 members of the “Mental Health Industry,”<br />

and when these “diseases” win the vote<br />

and are included in the next edition of the DSM,<br />

they become by that fact “real.” I would suggest<br />

that any person who is about to have a diagnosis<br />

rendered upon them through the use of DSM<br />

IV and is concerned about their right to disagree<br />

should contact attorney Skip Simpson of Dallas,<br />

Texas.”<br />

“The DSM-IV is a political document . . . Psychiatrists<br />

create myriad phony illnesses to justify their constant<br />

destruction of innocent people with heavy<br />

drugs, electric shocks, insulin shocks, other shocks,<br />

and destructive brain operations. The DSM-IV is<br />

the vehicle for this criminal fraud.“<br />

“Imagine for a moment that someone tattoos a<br />

single word upon <strong>your</strong> forehead.”<br />

“The DSM is to psychiatry what Malleus Maleficarum<br />

was to the Inquisition. Historians will find it<br />

an essential guide to the superstition and cruelty<br />

of the period.“<br />

“Hi, I’m Lynn. I was thinking of buying this book<br />

DSM-IV-TR. For those of you who already have it,<br />

is it just a reference book or are there any tests in<br />

it that tell you what the diagnosis is? If not have<br />

you seen anything like this anywhere? Feel free to<br />

email me. Thank you, Lynn” —via David E. Brown,<br />

Saturation.org<br />

* * *<br />

From Consumer Behaviour (Prentice Hall),<br />

an online textbook by Schiffman, Bednall,<br />

Cowley, O’Cass, Watson and Kanuk:<br />

STAY FREE! 10 ISSUE NO. 23


“People who achieve goals often raise their aspiration<br />

level and pursue new goals. People who<br />

fail to achieve goals may select substitute goals<br />

or become frustrated and adopt defense mechanisms.<br />

Defense mechanisms affect consumption in<br />

which of the following ways?<br />

A. Aggressive consumers may boycott companies<br />

or riot for better social conditions.<br />

B. Consumers may rationalize that an unattainable<br />

product or service is not really worth having.<br />

C. Consumers may purchase goods and services<br />

that people in similar situations use to overcome<br />

similar frustrations.<br />

D. A and B<br />

E. All of the above<br />

Answer: E<br />

(Thanks to Barbara Kerr for the link:<br />

http://cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/<br />

schiffman_au/)<br />

* * *<br />

Women are substantially overrepresented<br />

in advertisements for psychiatric<br />

drugs and are usually shown as submissive,<br />

sexy, or asleep, according to an analysis<br />

that compared ads over a 20-year period in three<br />

psychiatry journals. Although in 1981 there were<br />

roughly equal numbers of men and women in psychiatric<br />

ads, by 2001 the number of women had<br />

soared to 80 percent in the Canadian Journal of<br />

Psychiatry and 88 percent in the American Journal<br />

of Psychiatry. That year, no men were shown in<br />

ads for antidepressants in the American Journal of<br />

Psychiatry. Overall, 88 percent of the drug ads depicted<br />

white people. The analysis was published<br />

in the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.<br />

“The effect of these advertisements on physician<br />

perception, diagnosis, and prescribing is unknown<br />

but may be substantial,” the researchers wrote.<br />

(Washington Post, 7/6/04)<br />

newsdesk.org<br />

issues in depth • context on demand<br />

No party loyalty. No poll worship. No dumbeddown<br />

infotainment. Get the real scoop on<br />

labor, environment, health, civics and more.<br />

"... a promising and necessary<br />

experiment in serious,<br />

noncommercial, online journalism."<br />

Freaked out by media monopolies?<br />

Help build a true, commercial-free alternative.<br />

Visit us online, subscribe for free,<br />

make a tax-deductible donation, or<br />

just tell a friend and help spread the word.<br />

Member, Independent Press Association<br />

–Michael Stoll, Grade the News<br />

A service of<br />

STAY FREE! 11 ISSUE NO. 23


Eyesore of the Month > by Charles Star<br />

When fake charitable<br />

clothing boxes invaded<br />

Brooklyn, our intrepid<br />

correspondent decided<br />

to repurpose them<br />

Don’t throw it away.<br />

Give it<br />

to me<br />

Perhaps you have seen one of the bright red<br />

and white sidewalk-cloggers that have spread,<br />

like a metastasized cancer, throughout Brooklyn<br />

and other cities across the U.S.<br />

Decorated with American flags, these<br />

eight-foot-tall behemoths implore<br />

us to deposit used clothes and<br />

shoes for the good of the environment.<br />

No one seems<br />

to know where they came<br />

from or why they appear<br />

in public spaces. But most<br />

If you want to give to SCHOOLS<br />

and CHARITIES you are free<br />

to do that. But if you want the<br />

convenience of this handy box,<br />

you’ll have to give it to me.<br />

For more information, write<br />

me_first_bklyn@hotmail.com or<br />

call me at 718-810-2527.<br />

CLOTHES AND SHOES<br />

(XL/38 waist, size 11 ONLY)<br />

If you are in a giving mood, please<br />

give to me. I’ve recently lost<br />

weight and my wardrobe needs<br />

updating.<br />

people assume them to be for<br />

a charitable cause and would be<br />

surprised to find that they are in fact<br />

owned by a for-profit company, the Chicagobased<br />

U’SAgain. The boxes made but a brief<br />

appearance in Park Slope proper—someone<br />

spray-painted EYESORE on a box on Seventh<br />

Avenue, and it disappeared shortly thereafter—yet<br />

they remain in Gowanus and Prospect<br />

Heights.<br />

This box is for used<br />

but stylish clothes (XL;<br />

waist 38) and shoes<br />

(size 11). I can wash the<br />

stuff myself, but please,<br />

nothing skanky.<br />

The clothing boxes got me thinking: if some<br />

out-of-town company can clog our sidewalks<br />

with its unsightly bunkers, what’s to prevent<br />

me from doing the same? After all, I can always<br />

use clothes. Lacking the resources to<br />

weld my own box, I opted to repurpose the<br />

ones belonging to U’SAgain. By simply pasting<br />

new messages over the U’SAgain boxes<br />

in Prospect Heights, I made them my own.<br />

STAY FREE! 12 ISSUE NO. 23


STAY FREE! 13 ISSUE NO. 23


U<br />

TH E TRO BLE<br />

If there is one chain<br />

that stands above all others in deserving<br />

<strong>your</strong> wrath it is Wal-Mart. The most successful retailer in the world<br />

is, not coincidentally, a pioneer of some of the<br />

imaginable. I’m not just talking about reckless sprawl, Kathy Lee’s<br />

shadiest business practices<br />

sweatshop line, or the censorship of popular music, but about Wal-Mart’s uncanny knack for<br />

uncovering some of the most innovative ways to screw people over, all the while maintaining<br />

its wholesome, all-American image. For instance, the company locks late-shift employees in at<br />

night, forbidding them to leave the store. Managers have required workers to clock out<br />

yet stay on the job, in order to avoid paying them overtime. The company has hired<br />

illegal immigrants and forced them to work seven-day weeks without breaks. It spies on<br />

employees, fires anyone remotely suspected of union activity,<br />

violates child-labor laws, and discriminates against female employees.<br />

It is this last misdeed that Liza Featherstone focuses on in her new book,<br />

Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Workers’ Rights at Wal-Mart.<br />

Featherstone, a New York–based journalist, chronicles the emergence of<br />

Dukes v. Wal-Mart, a class-action suit by Wal-Mart’s women workers that is<br />

currently winding its way through the courts. In telling the employees’ stories,<br />

Featherstone discusses the broader societal impact of the retail<br />

giant, and the terrifying prospect of its continued growth. Wal-Mart thrives in part by<br />

offering poor and working-class people (its primary consumer base) the lowest prices<br />

around. But this boon to consumers is also a disaster for workers and local community members.<br />

That is, it hurts the very people it helps. Reading Featherstone’s book made me<br />

realize that shopping at Wal-Mart is a little like smoking<br />

crack: the low-prices undoubtedly fill a need (particularly for the poor) but<br />

they only come back to bite you in the end.<br />

STAY FREE! 14 ISSUE NO. 23


WI<br />

T<br />

H<br />

WAL -MAR<br />

T<br />

STAY FREE!: In <strong>your</strong> book you discuss<br />

patterns of sex discrimination in Wal-<br />

Marts across the country. Women earn<br />

less; they can’t get promoted; if they<br />

complain, they’re punished; and so on.<br />

The plaintiffs in the current class-action<br />

suit have an airtight case. Did any of<br />

these women seriously consider pursuing<br />

private lawsuits? How did this end<br />

up as a class action?<br />

LIZA FEATHERSTONE: Some of the<br />

women had filed claims with the Equal<br />

Employment Opportunity Commission,<br />

but a lot of them wouldn’t have pursued<br />

individual lawsuits, because most lawyers<br />

will say, “you don’t want to do this.”<br />

Small lawyers don’t have the resources<br />

to <strong>take</strong> on a company of Wal-Mart’s<br />

size. Some women have won lawsuits,<br />

and evidence from those cases informs<br />

this case, but women in general<br />

haven’t had very<br />

good luck in getting lawyers to pursue<br />

Wal-Mart. So that’s a reason why class<br />

action is a good strategy.<br />

STAY FREE!: I was amazed that some of<br />

these women—who had been through<br />

hell with Wal-Mart and had incredibly<br />

solid cases—would opt for a classaction<br />

suit, because they’d get a lot more<br />

money out of a private lawsuit. Also,<br />

they wouldn’t have to worry about the<br />

case dragging on for years.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes, actually, in their<br />

cases, they have the resources to pursue<br />

individual suits, but they really want to<br />

change Wal-Mart. If they were to sue<br />

as individuals, Wal-Mart would settle<br />

and it would never have to make<br />

any institutional<br />

reforms. The only reason these women<br />

are doing the class action—aside from<br />

the strength in numbers—is because<br />

they want to change the company.<br />

STAY FREE!: But if a bunch of women<br />

sued Wal-Mart individually, wouldn’t<br />

Wal-Mart see that they’re losing money<br />

and see that discrimination is ultimately<br />

against their interest?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: No, there would be so<br />

few cases that it wouldn’t matter. A million<br />

dollars every few years is nothing<br />

to Wal-Mart.<br />

STAY FREE!: How successful are classaction<br />

suits in changing companies? If<br />

the workers win, what then?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: With a<br />

class-action suit, you<br />

can order a company<br />

to pay back<br />

wages to the<br />

people it<br />

Illustration by Jeff Faerber<br />

STAY FREE! 15 ISSUE NO. 23


STAY FREE! 16 ISSUE NO. 23


wronged. You can order it to change<br />

its promotion system, to provide better<br />

incentives for promoting minorities,<br />

to post its jobs, and you can have some<br />

degree of enforcement. That’s the ideal<br />

scenario. Those reforms are so much better<br />

than nothing, but they’re ultimately<br />

kind of limited because they don’t really<br />

change the balance of power between<br />

the worker and the employer very much.<br />

What you can accomplish with a classaction<br />

suit is nothing next to what you<br />

can accomplish if the workers organize.<br />

STAY FREE!: In the book, you also pointed<br />

out that one of the key advantages of<br />

class-action suits is media coverage.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: That’s right. If you sue<br />

Wal-Mart as an individual, the media<br />

isn’t going to care very much. But if<br />

you’re suing Wal-Mart on behalf of 1.6<br />

million other women, as Betty Dukes is,<br />

you get an enormous amount of attention,<br />

and that embarrasses the company.<br />

STAY FREE!: The woman in the Wal-Mart<br />

commercials who talks about how great<br />

Wal-Mart treats women looks like Betty<br />

Dukes. Do you think that’s intentional?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Oh, absolutely. She’s<br />

a black, middle-aged woman, just like<br />

Betty Dukes. She’s a department manager,<br />

which is the job Betty Dukes has<br />

been seeking the entire time she’s been at<br />

Wal-Mart. She is Betty Dukes in the ideal<br />

Wal-Mart.<br />

STAY FREE!: How effective do you think<br />

the commercials are?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: A lot of workers tell me<br />

that their friends think Wal-Mart must<br />

be a great place to work because they see<br />

the commercials. And people have told<br />

me they went to work at Wal-Mart in<br />

part due to the commercials. The commercials<br />

have always featured happy<br />

employees.<br />

STAY FREE!: All the commercials seem to<br />

be the exact opposite of the reality. You<br />

described one that talks about how great<br />

the Wal-Mart health-care package is.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes, it shows a very<br />

sweet, caring young father whose baby<br />

had some horrible disease, and he says<br />

that, thanks to Wal-Mart, the baby<br />

People often buy the idea that low prices equals<br />

a better standard of living. They tend to focus<br />

on how they’re treated as<br />

consumers rather<br />

than how they’re treated as taxpayers or<br />

workers or citizens.<br />

was able to get coverage. In real life,<br />

that baby would have indeed been covered<br />

for some terrible disease, but the<br />

sneaky thing is that Wal-Mart’s healthcare<br />

plan is weighted toward exactly<br />

that kind of catastrophic illness. That’s<br />

not what most babies need. Most babies<br />

need preventive care, which Wal-Mart’s<br />

plan doesn’t provide. Babies need a lot<br />

of checkups. Wal-Mart doesn’t cover all<br />

kinds of vaccinations. If the father had<br />

been a new employee, it would have<br />

<strong>take</strong>n him about six months to get coverage<br />

for his family.<br />

STAY FREE!: Aren’t many employees gone<br />

by that time?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes, and he would have<br />

had to pay a third of the cost of the<br />

health insurance from his salary. If that<br />

same father were to work for another<br />

large company, that baby would have a<br />

better shot at getting the preventive care<br />

he needs in case he recovers from the terrible<br />

illness and needs stuff that regular<br />

babies need.<br />

STAY FREE!: Wal-Mart used to run a<br />

“Buy America” campaign. What happened<br />

to that?<br />

Jeff Faerber<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Sam Walton started<br />

the “Buy America” campaign in the late<br />

1980s in response to criticism that Wal-<br />

Mart was selling more foreign goods than<br />

STAY FREE! 17 ISSUE NO. 23


American goods. Again, like the health<br />

ads, the spots were impressively nonspecific.<br />

They never said that everything at<br />

Wal-Mart was made in America; they<br />

never even said a majority of the items<br />

were made in America—and even at that<br />

point I’m pretty sure that the majority of<br />

items in the store were made overseas.<br />

It was merely intended to highlight that<br />

some of their goods were made domestically.<br />

Since then, they have dropped<br />

the campaign because it has become so<br />

implausible. If Wal-Mart were a country,<br />

it would be China’s largest export market.<br />

Very few items sold in the store are<br />

made in the U.S.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do they still run the “Buy<br />

Canadian” and the “Buy Mexican” campaigns<br />

in those countries?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: I don’t know about<br />

those, but they do have a nativist campaign<br />

in China. I’m sure it’s convincing<br />

there because the stuff really is made in<br />

China! [laughs]<br />

STAY FREE!: When Wal-Mart decides to<br />

open a store in a town, is it protested<br />

more than other big-box stores?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes. It’s easier to get a<br />

campaign against Wal-Mart. I think the<br />

general public is becoming more familiar<br />

with their practices.<br />

STAY FREE!: The arguments Wal-Mart<br />

makes for bringing the store to a town<br />

are that it offers low prices, new jobs,<br />

and more tax revenue. Clearly, Wal-<br />

Mart has low prices, but what evidence<br />

is there to support or discredit the other<br />

two claims?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: The increase in jobs<br />

claim isn’t always true because Wal-Mart<br />

puts other stores out of business.<br />

STAY FREE!: Have there been any empirical<br />

studies along these lines?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes, but I don’t know<br />

much about them. The research on<br />

this is very ambiguous because a lot of<br />

small businesses don’t have great pay<br />

or benefits, either. Plus, a lot of them<br />

don’t employ very many people—they’re<br />

small. So I wouldn’t say it’s a myth that<br />

Wal-Mart brings jobs. There are large<br />

areas of this country where there is no<br />

meaningful economic development at<br />

all, and Wal-Mart tends to target those<br />

areas because they contain a supply of<br />

poor customers and workers—people<br />

who will accept the jobs and be eager for<br />

the low prices.<br />

Now, the question about tax revenue:<br />

Wal-Mart is a serious drain on communities<br />

because it aggressively seeks out<br />

huge tax breaks. They often come into<br />

small towns and get several million dollars<br />

in corporate tax breaks and subsidies<br />

for buildings. And on top of that,<br />

they drain the communities by creating a<br />

Wal-Mart ends up driving down<br />

wages in industries they are not<br />

directly involved in.<br />

low-wage workforce that requires public<br />

subsidy. People who aren’t making a living<br />

wage need housing, they need health<br />

care, and they even need food stamps.<br />

In many places, Wal-Mart is the leading<br />

company in the number of dependents<br />

on welfare. That’s well-documented.<br />

These are people who are working—they<br />

shouldn’t need welfare! The benefits that<br />

Wal-Mart may appear to bring to a community<br />

are a double-edged sword. People<br />

tend to buy the idea that low prices equal<br />

a better standard of living. They tend to<br />

focus on how they’re treated as consumers<br />

rather than how they’re treated as<br />

taxpayers or workers or citizens.<br />

STAY FREE!: Have any towns or other<br />

municipalities passed laws against Wal-<br />

Mart in particular?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: I don’t think you can<br />

pass a law against a particular company,<br />

but some places have passed laws banning<br />

retailers of a certain size, which can<br />

rule out Wal-Mart Supercenters. Many<br />

places have tried to pass such a law and<br />

have been defeated by Wal-Mart front<br />

groups with names like Citizens for Fair<br />

Commerce.<br />

STAY FREE!: Where’s the nearest Wal-<br />

Mart here in New York?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: There’s one in Union,<br />

New Jersey. And there’s one in Valley<br />

Stream, Long Island. I periodically check<br />

on the website to find the closest, and<br />

there’s always a new one.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you think they’ll try to<br />

open a store in New York City?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: I do. They have been<br />

talking to real estate people; they’ve made<br />

public statements saying it’s a market<br />

they’d like to get into. They don’t know<br />

how to approach it, because it would be<br />

a huge political battle. Actually, somebody<br />

last night asked me if Wal-Mart’s<br />

expansion into urban areas would possibly<br />

have a good effect because, as Wal-<br />

Mart goes into places where organized<br />

labor is stronger, it might be forced to<br />

change its bad practices. But I don’t<br />

think that we in New York should risk<br />

having Wal-Mart come in, lower wages,<br />

and be a blight on the landscape. Here,<br />

it’s also a cultural issue. On one level,<br />

that’s a little bit elitist. On the other<br />

hand, I don’t think people come to New<br />

York to see chain stores. As more of the<br />

country becomes over<strong>take</strong>n by this stuff,<br />

it’s important to have places that are not,<br />

to show that it can work.<br />

STAY FREE!: Yeah, we’re now seeing cities<br />

imitating Times Square by putting up<br />

these large moving billboards in their<br />

business districts.<br />

Does Wal-Mart engage in predatory<br />

pricing? Do they use price to intentionally<br />

put other retailers out of business?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes, and it’s so central to<br />

the way they do business that I can’t even<br />

think of an example. Wal-Mart has gone<br />

to some places, put all the stores out of<br />

business, found that their store still isn’t<br />

STAY FREE! 18 ISSUE NO. 23


THE REPUBLIC OF WAL-MART<br />

Annual Wal-Mart sales are higher than the GDPs of several industrialized nations<br />

Noah Scalin<br />

profitable enough and closed it down,<br />

leaving those places with no stores at all.<br />

STAY FREE!: I know Wal-Mart has hurt<br />

the music industry. They use CDs as<br />

loss-leaders, selling below cost. Tower<br />

Records, for example, has filed for Chapter<br />

11 bankruptcy protection. Wal-Mart<br />

has also priced out toy retailers.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes, FAO Schwarz has<br />

filed for bankruptcy, and Toys ’R’ Us is<br />

having serious problems, and a lot of that<br />

is due to Wal-Mart. I think they do that<br />

in almost every area. They’re also very<br />

aggressive in selling books, which is one<br />

of the reasons independent bookstores<br />

hate them so much. Hopefully, they’ll<br />

therefore aggressively promote my book!<br />

[laughs]<br />

STAY FREE!: Can you talk a little bit about<br />

Wal-Mart’s effects on other businesses?<br />

I’ve read that it really puts the squeeze on<br />

suppliers and other companies it works<br />

with. Wal-Mart continually strives to<br />

lower its prices from the previous year,<br />

which strikes me as incredible.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Wal-Mart suppliers are<br />

in a bind because they can’t not do business<br />

with Wal-Mart, but that forces them<br />

to lower their prices, which can affect<br />

wages everywhere. So Wal-Mart ends up<br />

driving down wages in industries they<br />

are not directly involved in. They affect<br />

wages in trucking and manufacturing,<br />

even in other countries, by putting pressure<br />

on suppliers to get them things faster<br />

and cheaper. They’re creating even more<br />

dire sweatshop situations in China.<br />

STAY FREE!: Back to predatory pricing, I<br />

guess what they’ve done to grocery stores<br />

would be an example.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes. Many grocery stores<br />

are unionized and offer good benefits,<br />

but that’s a real disadvantage when<br />

you’re competing with Wal-Mart. Some<br />

grocers have been put out of business. In<br />

California, the grocery strike that went<br />

on so long last year was one of the few<br />

instances where there was a huge labor<br />

dispute because of competition from a<br />

company that hadn’t even entered the<br />

market yet. Wal-Mart was about to start<br />

opening Supercenters, which sell groceries,<br />

and that put the workers at a major<br />

disadvantage, so they ended up getting a<br />

lower wage than they would have gotten<br />

if Wal-Mart wasn’t around. Labor<br />

leaders all over the country now say that<br />

anytime you’re having a negotiation in<br />

the private sector, there’s always an 800-<br />

pound elephant in the room, and that is<br />

Wal-Mart.<br />

STAY FREE!: Wal-Mart has repeatedly<br />

been fined for falsifying or destroying<br />

evidence in court cases involving shoppers<br />

who were injured or robbed at one<br />

of its stores. Do you know if Wal-Mart<br />

is worse than other stores on these kinds<br />

of cases?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: I looked into slip-andfall<br />

cases once, but no one seemed to<br />

have a good answer for how Wal-Mart<br />

compared with other companies. Maybe<br />

there are a lot of slip-and-fall cases<br />

because there are a lot of Wal-Marts. I’ve<br />

talked to some of those people, though.<br />

One woman started a website called<br />

WalMartSurvivor.com. [laughs]<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you keep track of other<br />

lawsuits? Other class-action suits?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes, there are many<br />

other class-action suits, at least 39 on the<br />

overtime issue alone, in different states.<br />

There’s also a class-action suit on behalf<br />

of immigrant janitors, who were forced<br />

to work for seven days without a break.<br />

STAY FREE! 19 ISSUE NO. 23


The United Food and Commercial Workers’ Vice President for Strategic Programs, Al Zack, observes that<br />

appealing to the poor was “Sam Walton’s real genius. He figured out how<br />

to make money off poverty. He located his first stores in poor rural<br />

areas and discovered a real market. The<br />

only problem with this business model is, it needs more poverty to<br />

grow.” That problem is cleverly solved by creating more bad<br />

jobs worldwide. In a chilling but perhaps equally clever reversal of<br />

Henry Ford’s strategy, which was to pay his workers amply so<br />

they could buy Ford cars, Wal-Mart’s stinginess contributes to an economy in<br />

which, increasingly, workers can only afford to shop at Wal-Mart.<br />

—Featherstone in Selling Women Short<br />

STAY FREE!: I read about one lawsuit<br />

involving a woman whose husband died<br />

of a heart attack. Afterwards, she discovered<br />

that Wal-Mart had <strong>take</strong>n out an<br />

insurance policy on his life!<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes. Vicky Rice. Her<br />

husband was incredibly overworked, as<br />

many Wal-Mart managers are. I believe<br />

he was an assistant manager, and assistant<br />

mangers are forced to work 70–80<br />

hours a week. In some sense, they are<br />

more exploited than hourly workers,<br />

because they are salaried, so they don’t<br />

get overtime.<br />

STAY FREE!: You mean that even the law<br />

says they don’t get overtime.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Right [laughs], because<br />

Wal-Mart workers don’t get overtime<br />

anyway! Actually, that’s another classaction<br />

suit: Wal-Mart makes assistant<br />

managers perform the duties of hourly<br />

workers in order to avoid paying overtime,<br />

so assistant managers have sued.<br />

Anyway, this woman’s husband was<br />

working 80 hours a week. I think he had<br />

a weak heart. One day, he was exhausted<br />

from working because he was understaffed,<br />

but he had to help a customer<br />

carry a TV to her car, and when he did, he<br />

had a heart attack and dropped dead. So,<br />

this is already a really sad story, but then<br />

his wife found out that Wal-Mart had an<br />

insurance claim on him. They were actually<br />

collecting money from his death!<br />

STAY FREE!: And they do this to lots of<br />

employees, right?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Yes. In fact, there are<br />

several class-action suits by people who<br />

were appalled to discover that Wal-<br />

Mart had been profiting from employee<br />

deaths.<br />

STAY FREE!: They do it because it’s a<br />

tax loophole. They store money in these<br />

insurance policies so they don’t have to<br />

pay taxes. How do you feel about bigbox<br />

stores in general? Are they necessarily<br />

bad?<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Other companies have<br />

very similar practices. Aesthetically, we<br />

all like Target better, but their wages are<br />

in many places low or just as low, and<br />

they all represent the Wal-Martization<br />

of our economy, which is the exchange<br />

of low prices for poor work conditions.<br />

But I don’t necessarily think that largeness<br />

is really the problem. Large stores<br />

don’t have to be worse than small stores.<br />

In fact, many studies have shown that<br />

large companies on average offer better<br />

wages and health benefits and are more<br />

easily well-unionized. There are a lot of<br />

things you could potentially do better on<br />

a big scale.<br />

STAY FREE!: Because you have the advantage<br />

of buying in bulk.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: Plus the convenience.<br />

No one wants to spend their entire Saturday<br />

running errands to different stores.<br />

Why not have a place that everyone in the<br />

community visits? A lot of people love<br />

going to Wal-Mart to run into friends.<br />

You could still have fairly cheap prices.<br />

Costco pays workers better, and they are<br />

quite cheap.<br />

STAY FREE!: You mention in the book<br />

that Wal-Mart is expected to run afoul<br />

of antitrust laws in 2009.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: I’m eager for that. If<br />

you control too great a share of the market,<br />

you are in danger of operating as a<br />

monopoly. But I certainly hope there will<br />

be more of a public outcry before 2009.<br />

STAY FREE!: What do you think is the<br />

greatest hope for checking Wal-Mart’s<br />

power? You’ve mentioned labor unions.<br />

FEATHERSTONE: I think that the biggest<br />

hope lies in labor and communities coming<br />

together, but they really need a lot<br />

of help. g<br />

Got story ideas?<br />

Know interesting local folks we<br />

should interview?<br />

cm@stayfreemagazine.org<br />

STAY FREE! 20 ISSUE NO. 23


WAL-MART PRANKED!<br />

I FIRST HEARD about the Wal-Mart position from a friend of<br />

mine who was working the early-morning shift. He explained<br />

that the electronics department needed an employee on the<br />

overnight shift because the last person who worked there was<br />

caught masturbating to a Cindy Crawford workout tape.<br />

Sadly, I’m not kidding.<br />

I was in college and needed the money, so I showed up<br />

one Wednesday for an interview. Believe it or not, the interview<br />

process was pretty thorough, especially considering that the job<br />

paid $6 an hour and entailed wearing a blue smock, cleaning up<br />

after dullards, and answering the same questions hundreds of<br />

times per hour. After a grueling two-hour interview, a drug test,<br />

and multiple calls to my references, I was finally accepted into<br />

the ranks of the Sam Walton elite: I became Joe “The Overnight<br />

Electronics Department Employee” Peacock.<br />

The job was a complete nightmare.<br />

The first few weeks were extremely frustrating. Because I<br />

was the new kid, I ended up as the victim of several “funny”<br />

pranks. For instance, I was told that the electronics person had<br />

to cover for the pet department, which was on the opposite end<br />

of the store. I was also informed that whenever possible, I should<br />

pitch in and help other departments stock their wares. It was<br />

common to find me putting away stock in other departments,<br />

while being paged back to my department every 10 minutes.<br />

Things went downhill from there. It started with my<br />

manager noticing discrepancies on my inventory reports. Each<br />

night, I found a note reminding me to check the battery count,<br />

or verify the film count, because the rack was off by one. I<br />

would count and count again, and the counts would match the<br />

inventory printout. It baffled me, but I didn’t spend too many<br />

cycles worrying about it. Yet more and more inventory began<br />

disappearing: video games, printer cartridges, and eventually<br />

a television. The notes from my manager became increasingly<br />

terse. I watched the department like a hawk, but saw nothing<br />

remotely suspicious.<br />

One morning, I was confronted by the overnight manager.<br />

I walked over to the offending aisle of printer cartridges, and<br />

demonstrated for him that the count matched exactly with<br />

what was on his new morning printout . . . hmm. That’s odd.<br />

It actually was off by one. No one had even come into my<br />

department that evening. Something stank.<br />

After a few days of investigation, the morning manager, not<br />

surprisingly, received horrible reviews of my performance from<br />

the other employees. The part that really fried my turkey was<br />

that the overnight manager, Darius, supported the claims of the<br />

overnight staff that I was not only lazy but was also pilfering<br />

STAY FREE! 21 ISSUE NO. 23


the stock for personal gain. I was furious. I explained—nay,<br />

pleaded—my case to the morning manger, to no avail.<br />

Which leads to a deeper, darker secret than working at<br />

Wal-Mart: I was actually fired from Wal-Mart. I would say that<br />

only a retard could get fired from Wal-Mart, but even the door<br />

greeter with Down Syndrome who once bit a female customer’s<br />

inner thigh was still employed. Truly it was one of the low<br />

points of my life.<br />

The following week, I visited the store to <strong>pick</strong> up my final<br />

paycheck, and I met up with the friend who initially referred<br />

me to the job. Fortunately, he was pretty tight with a few of<br />

the overnight employees, and he told me what had happened.<br />

In an attempt to frame me for theft, some of those magnificent<br />

meatheads had been using the inventory gun to scan items,<br />

increasing the inventory by one unit every morning, so that it<br />

looked like we had constant shrinkage.<br />

I asked my friend what I had done to piss them off so<br />

badly. He replied: “Dude, you didn’t do anything. These are<br />

simple people who are not worthy of <strong>your</strong> hatred.”<br />

Still, hearing about the conspiracy made me angry. And<br />

when anger is involved, revenge is not very far behind.<br />

The day after Thanksgiving is notorious for being the<br />

busiest shopping day of the entire year, and I determined that<br />

my vengeance should <strong>take</strong> place on that day.<br />

Since I was the guy who set up everything in the electronics<br />

department for almost seven months, a few small advantages<br />

were mine alone. For instance, I was the only one who knew<br />

the lockout codes for the DirecTV and the demo DVD player.<br />

These components sat inside the cabinet of an entertainment<br />

center, and I still had the keys. I was also the only one who knew<br />

the CMOS and screensaver passwords to all the demo PCs in<br />

the department. But my real advantage was the knowledge that<br />

there was an extra working phone line underneath the main<br />

CD rack in the center of the department.<br />

Thanksgiving night, I entered the store at midnight and set<br />

to work. The morning manager never got around to filling my<br />

position, and 80 percent of the workforce had the night off, so<br />

the store was my playground.<br />

First, I went to work on the DirecTV system, locking out<br />

every channel except for The Hot Network, a hard-core porn<br />

channel. While in the cabinet, I inserted a special DVD-R I had<br />

made into the demo DVD unit, then I put a special VHS tape<br />

into the VCR. I turned off all the units, then locked up the<br />

demo cabinet and grabbed the remote controls. After that, I<br />

turned up the volume on every TV as high as it would go.<br />

Still not satisfied, I moved over to the PCs and changed<br />

a few settings, then rebooted them to lock in the passwords.<br />

Finally, I took a cordless telephone and plugged it into the<br />

aforementioned vacant phone jack. Everything in place, I left<br />

the store with a gigantic smile on my face.<br />

Naturally, the store was flooded at 6 a.m, when special<br />

sales began. There were lines to wait for a place in another<br />

line. I showed up around 11 a.m. and easily breezed through<br />

the store; not one of my former coworkers spotted me. I<br />

went over to my rigged electronics department to do a final<br />

survey of the area. All the televisions were on, screens black,<br />

with a small message at the bottom of each screen that read<br />

“signal unavailable.” All the demo PCs had rolled over to their<br />

screensavers, which scrolled in blue text on a red background<br />

“I AM A LUCKY COMPUTER! TAKE ME HOME!” Moving<br />

the mouse or using the keyboard would not disable the<br />

screensaver, since they were password-protected. Everything<br />

looked ready.<br />

I ran over to my secret hiding area in the pharmacy and<br />

took out the cordless phone. It was time for the festivities<br />

to begin. Using the paging system I had just hijacked, I<br />

announced: “Greetings, Wal-Mart holiday shoppers! One of<br />

our unadvertised specials is taking place RIGHT NOW! For<br />

the next 30 minutes in the electronics department, if you see<br />

a computer that reads “I AM A LUCKY COMPUTER!” that<br />

computer model is 70 percent off the already low sale price!<br />

These computers are first come, first served, so hurry to the<br />

electronics department! And as always, thank you for shopping<br />

Wal-Mart!”<br />

The floodgates opened. Following the hordes of bargain<br />

hunters, I rushed over to the electronics department to look<br />

for the computer models that were “on sale.” Astounding!<br />

Every single machine had a demo model that scrolled the magic<br />

phrase! But my actual intention was not to screw Wal-Mart on<br />

the price of their computers; it was to build an audience.<br />

As the department reached critical capacity, I pulled out<br />

my stolen remotes for the demo units and turned on all three.<br />

Immediately, the top row of televisions, at full volume, flipped<br />

to images from the DirecTV system that was locked on hardcore<br />

pornography; the middle tier of televisions began showing<br />

images from Where the Boys Aren’t, Vol. 12—Sorority<br />

Sleepover, and the bottom row of televisions was playing<br />

German scheiße films.<br />

There is no way I can describe the resulting chaos, so I will<br />

leave it alone, mentioning only that I barely managed to crawl<br />

out of the store because I was doubled over with laughter.<br />

What a happy holiday season I had that year. I heard later<br />

from my friend that the store had to honor the “advertised” sale<br />

on the computers, and that the “wall o’ filth” actually played<br />

at full volume for the better part of an hour, as the department<br />

was so packed with spectators that employees could barely<br />

move through to the demo cabinet, which they obsessed over<br />

unlocking instead of simply turning off the televisions. Overall,<br />

the panic and unrest went on for longer than six hours.<br />

The best part was that Wal-Mart accidentally paid me for<br />

another two weeks after I had been fired. Some time later, they<br />

sent a letter explaining that this was due to an error in the<br />

payroll system and requested that I return the money. I wrote<br />

the word scheiße with a chocolate bar on the letter, and mailed<br />

it back, wondering if they would get the joke. I then put the<br />

money into a tech-heavy stock portfolio that about a year ago<br />

lost every cent.<br />

Oh well. Easy come, easy go. —Joe Peacock<br />

A longer version of this story appears on Peacock’s website,<br />

mentallyincontinent.com, and will be Chapter One of the<br />

forthcoming book of the same name.<br />

STAY FREE! 22 ISSUE NO. 23


Police Report > by Tamar Rothenberg<br />

I WAS A HIGH SCHOOL TERRORIST<br />

A Windsor Terrace teenager is mis<strong>take</strong>n for one of al Qaeda’s<br />

ADAM WACHOLDER IS a genial 17-year-old with long, dark<br />

hair and a penchant for tie-dyed shirts. He is not a terrorist. He<br />

just looks like one—a terrorist named Adam.<br />

Adam Yahiye Gadahn is wanted by the FBI as an al Qaeda<br />

operative who has allegedly trained at al Qaeda camps<br />

and served as an al Qaeda translator. His mug shot, plastered<br />

all over newspapers, TV news, and web sites beginning May<br />

27, 2004, shows a pale moon face with a baby scruff Lincoln<br />

beard, framed by long, wavy hair parted in the middle. Just like<br />

Adam Wacholder.<br />

Adam Wacholder’s<br />

father, a wholesale food<br />

distributor who lives in<br />

Windsor Terrace, alerted<br />

him to this fact around 8<br />

a.m. that morning. “He<br />

told me to watch out,”<br />

said Adam. “I thought he<br />

was joking, but he sounded<br />

pretty serious.”<br />

At City-As-School,<br />

an alternative public<br />

school in SoHo, Adam<br />

confronted classmates<br />

armed with copies of the<br />

Daily News, which students<br />

there get free. “For<br />

how many potheads there<br />

Adam Yahiye Gadahn,<br />

suspected al Qaeda operative<br />

are at my school, they’re pretty educated, smart people,” said<br />

Adam. They read the newspaper—and look at the pictures.<br />

“One kid yelled at me, ‘Terrorist!’”<br />

His classmates gathered around him, holding up the paper<br />

and marveling at the likeness. “It was my 15 minutes of fame,”<br />

said Adam. “At least I didn’t have to make any speeches.”<br />

The commotion was a worthy excuse for Adam’s tardiness<br />

at his internship at New Youth Connections, a magazine<br />

written by and for teens in New York City. After alerting his<br />

editors and his fellow writers to his dangerous double, Adam<br />

turned his attention to the story he’d been writing all semester<br />

about his love of rock music. (That’s a major difference<br />

between the long-haired Adams: the suspected terrorist had<br />

been into death metal, not the Beatles, Neil Young, Brian Eno,<br />

Queen and XTC.)<br />

Adam’s evil clone continued to hover, while the Daily<br />

News kept the excitement going at school. Despite the publicity,<br />

the California resident remained at large, along with the<br />

six other alleged al Qaeda operatives, who were all foreign<br />

nationals.<br />

A few weeks later, Tom Brown, who handles subscriptions<br />

at New Youth Connections, got a visit from two NYPD detectives.<br />

Someone had spotted Adam’s picture in the magazine,<br />

alongside a story he wrote, and alerted the authorities.<br />

The NYPD officers requested information on the whereabouts<br />

of Adam Wacholder, but they didn’t have a warrant, so<br />

Tom declined to hand over the young writer’s home address or<br />

phone number. When they left, Tom called Adam to warn him<br />

that the cops were on his tail.<br />

“My heart jumped half a jump,” said Adam. Even though<br />

he knew he wasn’t the<br />

Adam they were looking<br />

for, “When the cops come<br />

looking for you, there’s always<br />

something to be concerned<br />

about.” The next<br />

day, “they just showed<br />

up” at the King’s Highway<br />

apartment where Adam<br />

lives with his mother, a<br />

teacher. Adam was in the<br />

shower when his mother<br />

came into the bathroom,<br />

“very uptight.”<br />

Adam emerged from<br />

the bathroom ten minutes<br />

Adam Wacholder, genial local<br />

boy, hippie<br />

later to find his neighbor<br />

Vinny standing in the<br />

doorway, talking to a guy<br />

wearing a “ghetto outfit” of a matching track suit. He was<br />

telling Vinny about the undercover work he’d been doing<br />

around Arab bodegas suspected of sending money to terrorist<br />

training camps.<br />

He and the other detective, who was undercover in a pastel<br />

blue polo shirt, assured Adam that their visit was just routine.<br />

“They have to make sure I’m not the guy.” So Adam showed<br />

them his true self, joking with them about his stash. “I’m pretty<br />

sure they could tell I was joking,” he said.<br />

Still, Adam’s mother had to show them all the paperwork<br />

and ID cards she could find: driver’s license, birth certificate,<br />

passport, prior passport, Social Security card.<br />

Convinced that the teenage Brooklynite, grandson of orthodox<br />

Jews, was not the married twentysomething Muslim<br />

convert from California, the detectives shook his hand and one<br />

of them gave Adam his card. “If I run into trouble, if I get<br />

<strong>pick</strong>ed up by the FBI, I can call him,” said Adam.<br />

Adam now carries the card with him at all times. So far,<br />

he hasn’t been confronted by anyone who might think he’s the<br />

lookalike terrorist. “After a few weeks,” Adam figures, “people<br />

forget what they look like.” g<br />

STAY FREE! 23 ISSUE NO. 23


Jake Greene, who’s homeless, has been standing in the<br />

same spot in front of Ace Supermarket on 7th Avenue for<br />

about a decade. With his winning smile and eternally sunny<br />

attitude, Greene gives North Slopers the impression that<br />

he actually likes asking for money.<br />

Greene affectionately refers to the people who regularly<br />

give him money as his “customers.” There is, for example,<br />

the young Hasidic man who usually gives a nickel—unless<br />

he doesn’t have a nickel, in which case he asks<br />

Greene for change for a quarter. There’s also the retired<br />

high school teacher who lives up the block, several women<br />

who bring produce, and a guy who simply hands Greene<br />

a vitamin (which Greene politely accepts, then discards).<br />

Between these donations, meals at the CHIPS soup kitchen,<br />

and occasional gifts of clothing, Greene has more than<br />

enough to feed and clothe himself. The bulk of his day,<br />

however, is geared toward making “the quota”—Greene<br />

needs to have $20 by the time Ace closes (10:30 p.m.) in order<br />

to get a hotel room. In fact, when I first tried to arrange<br />

an interview, he continually postponed so he could make<br />

his numbers. After three or four cancellations, I figured out<br />

that if I just hung around and chatted, he was more than<br />

amenable. It was then that Greene told me about serving<br />

jail time.<br />

In 1996, Greene was falsely accused of raping a young<br />

Park Slope woman and was jailed for five months before<br />

justice officials figured out they had the wrong guy. Upon<br />

release, Greene returned to his spot in front of Ace and,<br />

for years, mentioned his story to people who stopped by<br />

to chat. Eventually, in 1999, he met a private investigator<br />

who put him in touch with Carmen Giordano, a Manhattan<br />

lawyer. According to a New York Post story about Greene’s<br />

case, Giordano “discovered that Greene hadn’t been put<br />

in a police lineup, even though there were two witnesses,<br />

and that he didn’t even resemble the composite sketch of<br />

the attacker.” Giordano told the Post, “I really think he was<br />

arrested because he was a familiar face in Park Slope.”<br />

Giordano filed a lawsuit against the city, the city settled,<br />

and Greene wound up with a check for $113,000. He<br />

then did something that few of his friends anticipated: he<br />

went right back to his spot in front of Ace. According to a<br />

longtime friend, Robert Dumas, Greene continued to ask<br />

people for change, while at the same time telling everyone<br />

within earshot about his windfall. Eventually, he took<br />

his money, got on a bus, and visited family members in<br />

Baltimore and South Carolina. He gave a good chunk of<br />

the money to friends and family, lost a large sum on a bad<br />

investment, and returned to his neighborhood, where he’s<br />

been ever since.<br />

While locals have come to rely on seeing Greene in<br />

his usual spot, he’s had to experiment with other locations<br />

lately. At the end of August, a fire broke out at the Olive<br />

Vine restaurant and burned down the bodega next door.<br />

The decline in foot traffic was immediate and, for Greene,<br />

brutal. The store was the anchor on the block, and it helped<br />

open the wallets of passersby. Still, I get the feeling that<br />

Greene will do okay. Or maybe that’s just his optimism rubbing<br />

off on me. —Carrie McLaren<br />

JAKE GREENE: THE<br />

STAY FREE!: Where are you from?<br />

GREENE: South Carolina. That’s cotton<strong>pick</strong>in’<br />

land. That’s what I used to do.<br />

It was very hard work. I came up here<br />

’round ’58 or ’59. I was about 16.<br />

STAY FREE!: What brought you here?<br />

GREENE: I moved up to be with my sister.<br />

There were 12 of us in all and some of<br />

my brothers and sisters were up here.<br />

STAY FREE!: Were they living in this<br />

neighborhood?<br />

GREENE: No, my sister was on Dean<br />

and Saratoga. In the 1960s, I lived in<br />

Bushwick, East New York, some other<br />

places. I didn’t come to this area till ’91<br />

or so.<br />

STAY FREE!: Was that when you first became<br />

homeless?<br />

GREENE: Yeah. I had been working for<br />

the Transit Authority, cleaning floors.<br />

I was in a bad marriage and because<br />

of my wife they were garnisheeing my<br />

wages. I wasn’t getting any money, I<br />

couldn’t <strong>take</strong> it anymore. My head was<br />

all messed up. I just left. I still want<br />

to get my retirement benefits, but they<br />

won’t give them to me.<br />

STAY FREE!: How long were you at the<br />

Transit Authority?<br />

GREENE: Nineteen and a half years. You<br />

have to be there twenty.<br />

STAY FREE!: Have you noticed the neighborhood<br />

changing over time?<br />

GREENE: Yeah, the black people moved<br />

away. Other people came here. It’s<br />

STAY FREE! 24 ISSUE NO. 23


Sabrina Hartel<br />

MAN ON THE STREET<br />

very different. Some stores have closed<br />

down, others have opened up. I miss the<br />

Hebrew National—that was right where<br />

that toy store is [across from Ace].<br />

STAY FREE!: I’ve noticed you don’t have<br />

a cup for <strong>your</strong> change.<br />

GREENE: Yeah, I don’t like that. Some<br />

people hold a cup and jangle the change<br />

around, not me. I used to, but not anymore.<br />

I’d rather talk to people [pauses].<br />

I try to go to the bank on weekends,<br />

when it’s not open. I like to hold the<br />

door open for people, to offer a service<br />

instead of just standing. Before I was<br />

locked up, I used to bring my radio and<br />

play jazz for people. They loved that.<br />

STAY FREE!: What kind of stuff would<br />

you play?<br />

GREENE: Miles Davis, Sonny Rollins,<br />

Thelonius Monk, Lester Young, but<br />

I lost all of my music when I went to<br />

jail. I lost my only picture of my grandmother<br />

too. I lost everything.<br />

STAY FREE!: You still have brothers and<br />

sisters in the area. Did they help you?<br />

GREENE: I haven’t seen any of my brothers<br />

and sisters in years. My brother got<br />

married last Saturday but I didn’t go.<br />

STAY FREE!: Are you arguing?<br />

GREENE: No, it’s all because of me. I<br />

don’t call. I can’t talk to them. My favorite<br />

sister died a few years ago. In 1997. I<br />

didn’t go to the funeral. I didn’t want to<br />

see her. I wanted to remember her by the<br />

picture I have in my mind of her dancing.<br />

She and I were the best dancers. We<br />

would go to the local clubs. There was<br />

Gayheart on Eastern Parkway, Presi-<br />

STAY FREE! 25 ISSUE NO. 23


dent Château on President, Fulton Terrace.<br />

This was in the 1960s. Places like<br />

that aren’t around anymore.<br />

[I leave for the night and return the following<br />

week. Jake is standing in front of<br />

Ace, but there is very little street traffic.]<br />

STAY FREE!: Hey, I expected you to be at<br />

the bank on the weekend!<br />

GREENE: I almost got arrested. They don’t<br />

like me standing in the bank.<br />

STAY FREE!: What happens when you’re<br />

arrested?<br />

GREENE: They <strong>take</strong> you downtown and<br />

you sit in jail for a day. When they release<br />

me I come right back here. [Jake tells me<br />

about the fire at Olive Vine and how it’s<br />

hurting his business.]<br />

STAY FREE!: So what happens when you<br />

don’t get enough money?<br />

GREENE: I go to the park on 3rd Avenue. I<br />

don’t go there by myself, though, no way!<br />

If I see a few people in the park, I’ll stay.<br />

If not, I’ll go ride in the subway. I’ll ride<br />

to the end of the line and then change<br />

trains and go the other way. I can usually<br />

get an hour or two of sleep at a time<br />

that way.<br />

STAY FREE!: You can nap a little during<br />

the day too, though, right? I’ve seen you<br />

sleep on that stoop over there.<br />

GREENE: Yes, but sometimes people wake<br />

me [to give money]—I hate that.<br />

STAY FREE!: Have you ever gotten hurt?<br />

GREENE: Yes. In the shelter on Atlantic<br />

and Bedford about four or five months<br />

ago. I got robbed a couple of times. How<br />

much can you stay awake to keep watch?<br />

You’ve gotta go to sleep eventually. They<br />

might have cleaned it up now. I don’t<br />

know. I haven’t been back.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you have a place where<br />

you can keep <strong>your</strong> stuff?<br />

GREENE: I have two places. One is in<br />

the hotel on Classon and Lefferts. I can<br />

lock my door and be by myself. [Silence.]<br />

Man, you don’t see the people no more.<br />

Where are my customers?<br />

STAY FREE!: Would it be possible for you<br />

to go to another vegetable stand? Another<br />

deli?<br />

GREENE: No, somebody might be there.<br />

STAY FREE!: You mean other people asking<br />

for change? What would happen<br />

if you did go to someone else’s place?<br />

Would they get mad?<br />

GREENE: I wouldn’t wait for that, I’d just<br />

leave.<br />

STAY FREE!: So you don’t try out different<br />

spots?<br />

WANTED<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

ADVERTISING PERSON: <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! seeks a smart, motivated<br />

human to help sell ads in March 2005 (hours are<br />

flexible). We’re looking for a reliable go-getter who enjoys<br />

talking to strangers and is familiar with Prospect Heights,<br />

Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Park Slope, and Boerum<br />

Hill. $12/hour for about 40 hours. An exceptional student<br />

could do most of the job over spring break. Send résumés<br />

and a cover letter by January 20, 2005.<br />

INTERN: Looking for a smart, motivated person to help<br />

with various duties. Research and computer skills, activism<br />

experience, writing ability, and a sense of humor will get<br />

you far. Must thrive in unstructured environments. No<br />

money. (Sorry!) Send résumé and cover letter.<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! 390 Butler Street, Brooklyn, NY 11217<br />

cm@stayfreemagazine.org<br />

STAY FREE! 26 ISSUE NO. 23


GREENE: No, I went down by Key<br />

Food, down by Garfield, but I didn’t<br />

have much luck. There, I’m new in the<br />

area. I’ve been here for so long, it’s just<br />

not the same.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do the restaurants around<br />

here help you out?<br />

GREENE: The ice cream place is good,<br />

Tasty D-Lite. Ozzie’s sometimes gives<br />

me sandwiches at night. [A woman<br />

comes by, hands Jake change, and apologizes,<br />

“I’m sorry for neglecting you<br />

earlier!” She smiles and is on her way.]<br />

STAY FREE!: Most of the people I’ve seen<br />

here are very sweet. Do people ever say<br />

rude things to you?<br />

GREENE: Yeah, they curse at me, but I<br />

don’t care. I don’t curse back. I don’t<br />

want to be negative. I try to have a good<br />

sense of humor, even if I get a negative<br />

response. g<br />

back issues<br />

#16. Jhally v. Twitchell on advertising. Pharmaceutical marketing, patent medicines, placebo<br />

effects. Mindlessness. #17. Outdoor ad creep. Manhattan ad map. Media literacy. Attention<br />

deficits. Dead famous people in ads. Commercial speech. #18. American history issue. Interviews:<br />

Jane Healy, Richard Sherwin, Inger Stole, James Loewen. #19. (digital only) Conspiracy<br />

issue. Interview with Mark Crispin Miller, FBI-created artwork, corporate urban legends, fastfood<br />

horror stories, real conspiracies in history. #20. (digital only) Copyright issue. Interviews<br />

with Siva Vaidhyanathan, and with Chuck D and Hank Shocklee of Public Enemy; Illegal Art<br />

Exhibit, people imitating the media. #21. Psychology Issue. History of the lobotomy, employee<br />

personality tests, cross-cultural mental illness, psychosomatic illness, werewolves. #22. Eugenics<br />

and attempts to breed a “better,” whiter race. The dark side of dog breeding. Robot marketing.<br />

How trial consultants rig juries. Napster in the 1930s. Subliminal advertising. Back issues<br />

are $4 each. Also available: anti-SUV postcards, Illegal Art Exhibit DVD and CD, and more.<br />

STAY FREE!<br />

390 BUTLER STREET<br />

BROOKLYN, NY 11217<br />

WWW.STAYFREEMAGAZINE.ORG<br />

STAY FREE! 27 ISSUE NO. 23


Interview > by Francis Heaney<br />

EUGENE MIRMAN<br />

The Park Slope comic talks about temping, his native Russia,<br />

and surviving the comedy biz.<br />

The first time I saw Eugene Mirman, he was pretending to have sex with himself. Okay, he was actually only<br />

pretending to have sex with a video of himself. And yet: disturbing. Odd. • The Mirman family immigrated to the<br />

United States from Russia when Eugene was 4. (A photo of the young Eugene Mirman can be seen at his website,<br />

eugenemirman.com, along with his videos, songs, and other work.) At some point after his arrival in America,<br />

he became a comedian. He now cohosts a weekly comedy night at Rififi in New York’s East Village, a show that<br />

features up-and-coming comics trying out new material, with none of the traditional comedy club’s overpriced<br />

two-drink minimums. That is the only thing he does. • I’m sorry, that’s false. Actually, he sometimes opens for<br />

rock bands (the Shins, Modest Mouse), performs on TV shows that are not hostile to the delicate art of standup<br />

comedy (Late Night With Conan O’Brien, Comedy Central’s Premium Blend), acts, and releases CDs. Well, one CD,<br />

anyway: The Absurd Nightclub Comedy of Eugene Mirman (with accompanying DVD). I used my powerful media<br />

connections (I know the editor of <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>!) to acquire an advance copy of the CD, an extremely entertaining<br />

artifact, in exchange for which my only duty was to interview the mysterious Mr. Mirman. I finally tracked him<br />

down at a sushi restaurant, tipped off to his presence by the fact that he had offered to meet me there. This is<br />

what he had to say for himself.—Francis Heaney<br />

Bridget Regan<br />

STAY FREE! 28 ISSUE NO. 23


STAY FREE!: So, you have a new comedy<br />

CD coming out, which is kind of<br />

daring, because it’s my understanding<br />

that most CDs have music on them.<br />

EUGENE MIRMAN: Comedy albums<br />

used to be a popular thing—one of<br />

the main ways people listened to comedy.<br />

People don’t really quite do that<br />

as much now.<br />

STAY FREE!: There was a big lull.<br />

MIRMAN: But one in which comedy<br />

was on television. HBO had youngcomedians<br />

specials, and there’d be<br />

comedians on one of the three talk<br />

shows, and especially in the ’80s,<br />

there was standup all over television,<br />

so albums weren’t as necessary.<br />

STAY FREE!: How did you decide what<br />

to include on the DVD? I was hoping<br />

“Mr. Robot” would be on it.<br />

MIRMAN: Well, that has a bunch of<br />

music that I don’t have license to, so I<br />

might have to swap the music out. It<br />

has Wilco, Jethro Tull . . . I’m going to<br />

put it on my website because I don’t<br />

make money through that. If someone<br />

gets upset, I’ll probably <strong>take</strong> it down.<br />

It’s, like, three seconds of music.<br />

STAY FREE!: Paying for rights is exorbitant.<br />

Of course, you could always<br />

just swap the songs with some by<br />

bands you know.<br />

MIRMAN: Yes. That’s my plan if I can’t<br />

keep what I have in there.<br />

STAY FREE!: That brings me to a whole<br />

other thing, which is that you went on<br />

a rock tour.<br />

MIRMAN: I really like playing rock<br />

clubs, but it can be more work if an<br />

audience doesn’t know you.<br />

STAY FREE!: The comedy shows you<br />

host are structured more like rock<br />

shows than comedy. At the crappy<br />

comedy clubs here, they make the<br />

comedians bring X number of people<br />

before they’re allowed to perform.<br />

MIRMAN: Well, that’s a “bringer”<br />

show. None of the people I know do<br />

those shows anymore, or would ever.<br />

That’s when you’re starting out. I find<br />

it easier to get on Conan O’Brien than<br />

to perform regularly at some of the<br />

clubs here, so I just don’t really try<br />

anymore. Not that I tried that hard.<br />

STAY FREE!: So it wasn’t really a complex<br />

thought process of, “Oh, I’m not<br />

going to run my shows like that because<br />

that’s lame.”<br />

MIRMAN: Right. When people ask me<br />

to perform at clubs, or if I audition<br />

for something, I’ll go to a club, but<br />

also it’s different in New York than in<br />

Boston. When I was in Boston, there<br />

were three comedy clubs. In most<br />

clubs you start as an opener, then<br />

you’re a “middler,” and then you’re<br />

a headliner, and there’s this system.<br />

But the system seems pointless and<br />

depressing. Here it’s kind of different,<br />

because there’s just a bunch of people<br />

performing for 20 minutes at a time<br />

at a club, as opposed to an opener.<br />

Anyway, the point is that rock clubs<br />

and alternative spaces are, for me, just<br />

as good if not better exposure, they’re<br />

fun, and you make more money. The<br />

argument against it is that it doesn’t<br />

exist. You have to make it. That’s<br />

what’s inconvenient about it. You<br />

have to create <strong>your</strong> own thing, which<br />

I personally enjoy.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you make <strong>your</strong> living<br />

at comedy?<br />

MIRMAN: I don’t do anything else. It’s<br />

like freelancing. It’s kind of tedious to<br />

be broke, but then a bunch of work<br />

will come in, or I’ll get a writing job,<br />

or, like, Comedy Central recently licensed<br />

the pot movie [a fake public<br />

service announcement in which Eugene<br />

dresses as an angel and warns<br />

viewers against smoking pot].<br />

STAY FREE!: They don’t mind the part<br />

where you describe a bunch of people<br />

jerking off on you?<br />

MIRMAN: They’re gonna beep stuff,<br />

though I’m not sure that’s one of the<br />

things they’re beeping! It’s for a new<br />

show that airs after midnight, so it’s<br />

for people who are already high.<br />

STAY FREE!: What were you doing before<br />

you did comedy full-time?<br />

MIRMAN: In Boston, I had an unspecific<br />

role in the creative department<br />

of a web company. Me and my officemates<br />

turned our office into a bar. I<br />

made my gun video there; that’s where<br />

I learned to edit. That was a great job,<br />

and then I moved here and was lucky<br />

enough to work at a horrible law firm<br />

for about half a year.<br />

STAY FREE!: So it was torture but it<br />

made you a lot of money?<br />

MIRMAN: I wasn’t a lawyer, but it was<br />

a fair amount. Anyone who works at<br />

a law firm will certainly agree that<br />

it’s a very feudalistic place, and they<br />

let you know right away that you<br />

are a serf and there is no hiding it.<br />

I remember being in an elevator, and<br />

there were two secretaries, and one<br />

looks at my “temporary” badge and<br />

says to the other, “How many temps<br />

do we need?” And she was looking<br />

right at me.<br />

STAY FREE!: So you’re a Russian immigrant<br />

and all that.<br />

MIRMAN: Yes, I am all of that.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you remember anything<br />

about Russia at all?<br />

MIRMAN: When I was in Boston with<br />

my parents at a Russian food store, I<br />

smelled black currant juice and said,<br />

“Oh, this is so weirdly familiar,” and<br />

it turns out that we had a summer<br />

home—I say “summer home,” but it<br />

probably was a cabin in the woods—<br />

and it was surrounded by black currant<br />

trees. But apparently that’s the<br />

only thing I remember. That, and all<br />

our money being redistributed.<br />

STAY FREE!: Your parents speak Russian.<br />

Do you still know any?<br />

STAY FREE! 29 ISSUE NO. 23


MIRMAN: Yes, I speak fluent Russian<br />

with my parents.<br />

STAY FREE!: Could you go to Russia<br />

and translate <strong>your</strong> act?<br />

MIRMAN: No. It’s one thing to speak<br />

to my parents, but I’m illiterate and I<br />

forget words because I don’t speak it<br />

every day.<br />

STAY FREE!: And some words are never<br />

going to come up in conversations<br />

with parents, like “cunnilingus.”<br />

be funny, though I would prefer a funny<br />

movie or a funny sketch talk show,<br />

or even some kind of new, odd format<br />

that broke all the rules. All of them!<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you have any secret<br />

projects in the works, past the CD/<br />

DVD?<br />

MIRMAN: I’m going to do a full-length<br />

DVD. And I’m trying to come up with<br />

shows, whether it’s a one-man show<br />

or stuff to pitch to various networks.<br />

I would rather wait a year to have<br />

MIRMAN: Actually, I was voted class<br />

clown! But I wasn’t the class clown.<br />

No, I was extraordinarily unpopular<br />

until my senior year, when I ran<br />

for class president, with the slogan,<br />

“It’s not just a change . . . it’s a mutation!”<br />

And though I lost, I converted<br />

students from hating me to thinking I<br />

was a swell guy, and even occasionally<br />

going on dates with me.<br />

STAY FREE!: I was seriously underdated<br />

in high school myself. . . . So you’re<br />

popular with the ladies, right?<br />

YOU KNOW HOW WHEN YOU SIGN UP FOR A CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT YOU HAVE TO<br />

ANSWER A QUESTION IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE ACCOUNT? WELL, THIS CREDIT CARD<br />

ACCOUNT ALLOWED ME TO PICK THE QUESTION, SO NOW WHEN THEY CALL, THEY<br />

HAVE TO ASK ME, “WHAT ARE YOU WEARING?” AND I HAVE TO RESPOND, “I DON’T<br />

THINK THAT’S APPROPRIATE!” —MIRMAN AT CAROLINE’S COMEDY CLUB<br />

MIRMAN: People often ask me, “Do<br />

you know any swears?” As if my parents<br />

were like, “Clean <strong>your</strong> room,<br />

faggot!” They just wouldn’t say that.<br />

So as a result I can only say things like<br />

“What a beautiful owl! Where’s the<br />

pan? Who wants more food?”<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you ever have to deal<br />

with corporate sponsors for <strong>your</strong><br />

shows?<br />

MIRMAN: No, but I’d like to. I’m going<br />

to have a CD release party, and<br />

I really want a scotch to sponsor it.<br />

Dewar’s or Macallan.<br />

STAY FREE!: I’ll tell you who’s a better<br />

bet—Brooklyn Brewery.<br />

MIRMAN: Yes, but I want a scotch.<br />

Even if I get somebody to just give me<br />

a bottle, I think that’ll be fine.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you want to follow<br />

the traditional standup comedy arc?<br />

Do you want to have a sitcom, or a<br />

sketch show?<br />

MIRMAN: There’s no genre of things<br />

that couldn’t be funny. A sitcom could<br />

somebody approach me than pitch<br />

ideas. I know so many people who go<br />

to pitch meetings and pitch to no real<br />

avail. It seems exhausting to come up<br />

with shows that you don’t really want<br />

to do in order to get on TV. In one<br />

year, if no one has approached me, I’m<br />

going to be like, fuck it. I’ll come up<br />

with some horrible, horrible shows.<br />

STAY FREE!: You could come up with<br />

ones you like first.<br />

MIRMAN: I have, actually, a number<br />

of shows that I think would be fun.<br />

My show is called The Late Show<br />

With David Letterman. And I can’t<br />

wait to tell people about it!<br />

STAY FREE!: If you got the right person<br />

to play David Letterman, that could<br />

be really funny.<br />

MIRMAN: I have someone in mind already:<br />

Jon Stewart.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do you have anything<br />

you were hoping I would ask? Like, “I<br />

want to talk about how, when I was a<br />

kid, I was a class clown. Nobody ever<br />

talks about that.”<br />

MIRMAN: Um, no? I don’t know.<br />

STAY FREE!: Because it seems that<br />

comedy is the most geeky thing that<br />

the public at large still finds at all sexy.<br />

So you don’t feel groupie pressure?<br />

MIRMAN: I don’t feel a pressure in<br />

terms of like, “Oh, I guess I have<br />

to make out with this person.” Yes,<br />

I have a hundred lovers, but I don’t<br />

know how to say it without hurting<br />

95 of their feelings. And that’s one<br />

person with 90 feelings, five with one<br />

feeling each, and 80 people with no<br />

feelings whatsoever. Just to break it<br />

down, I mean. Hopefully, through<br />

fame, I’ll find a wife.<br />

STAY FREE!: What if comedy totally<br />

crashes and burns for you? What<br />

would you do instead?<br />

MIRMAN: I would just keep doing it<br />

in a sad, shitty way. There’s nothing<br />

really to stop doing. There might be<br />

a point at which I become exhausted<br />

of scraping things together, or waiting<br />

for things to happen, but I would<br />

still attempt to change the world with<br />

my comedy. g<br />

Bridget Regan<br />

STAY FREE! 30 ISSUE NO. 23


y Eugene Mirman<br />

Top Park Slope Hangouts<br />

Great Lakes (above)<br />

Maybe my favorite bar. It’s hard to tell with familiarity: am I<br />

used to it or is it the best? A wonderful, warm atmosphere<br />

with great bartenders. Come on by and hit on Julie, but<br />

don’t mis<strong>take</strong> her friendliness for liking you. She’d rather<br />

you cut it out, unless she wants to make out with you, then<br />

keep it up! Great songs on the jukebox, including a mix I<br />

made for the bar. My home away from home. Literally. I live<br />

in a studio and slowly go crazy throughout the day. It’s like<br />

an awesome jail. But after a day of no human contact, I like<br />

to go to the Lakes and meet up with friends and try to make<br />

out with people. (284 5th Avenue, 718-499-3710)<br />

Bageltique<br />

If it is 3 a.m. and you are hungry, go to the Bageltique and<br />

get this: a bacon, egg, turkey, and cheese sandwich on a<br />

sub roll. There’s other stuff, but you can’t have it. If you<br />

are vegan, you can have a bagel with tofu cream cheese,<br />

and afterwards, tell people some crap about how animals<br />

are shot and robbed in slaughterhouses. (242 5th Avenue,<br />

718-638-1866)<br />

Gorilla Coffee<br />

A great way to run into people you can’t completely<br />

remember. Did we go to college together? No? Well, good<br />

luck with <strong>your</strong> band, then. Plus free internet. That’s right,<br />

neurotically check <strong>your</strong> email to see if <strong>your</strong> friends want you<br />

to come to their show! They do. Super coffee, Chai, White<br />

Mocha Lattes, and a good place to meet sexy moms. (97 5th<br />

Avenue, 718-230-3244)<br />

Al Di La<br />

One of my favorite restaurants. The food, flown in directly<br />

from Italy every morning (probably not) is incredible—like<br />

someone threw a surprise party in <strong>your</strong> mouth, even though<br />

you said you didn’t want a party, but then you were like,<br />

“This is really fun.” A great place to bring <strong>your</strong> parents or a<br />

date. Especially if you want to sit next to someone else on<br />

a date. Then you can go, “Hey, are you two going all the<br />

way later?” And one of them will go, “What did you say? I<br />

can’t hear you over my delicious hanger steak!” Imagine a<br />

place with food so good, people can’t hear sexually invasive<br />

chitchat! (248 5th Avenue, 718-636-8888)<br />

STAY FREE! 31 ISSUE NO. 23<br />

continued on page 59


$30,000<br />

$787,999,502<br />

$96,012<br />

STAY FREE! 32 ISSUE NO. 23


Interview > by Carrie McLaren<br />

PRICING THE PRICELESS<br />

How much would you pay for a case of chronic bronchitis? How<br />

many dollars are hunchback whales worth? Frank Ackerman and Lisa<br />

Heinzerling discuss the sordid world of cost-benefit analysis.<br />

Hugo Humberto Plácido da Silva<br />

FOR YEARS, the cell phone industry has harbored a dirty<br />

little secret: talking on a cell phone while driving is about<br />

as dangerous as driving drunk. Even the pro-business<br />

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis recently estimated that<br />

the use of cell phones by drivers may result in approximately<br />

2,600 deaths and 330,000 injuries each year. Yet<br />

attempts to ban cell phone use in cars in the U.S. have as<br />

of yet proved feckless. New York and several other municipalities<br />

forbid drivers to use handheld phones but allow<br />

“hands-free” versions, which, research shows, aren’t<br />

any less dangerous.<br />

In their excellent new book Priceless: On Knowing<br />

the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing (New<br />

Press, 2004), Frank Ackerman and Lisa Heinzerling show<br />

how the cell phone industry has managed to escape regulation<br />

for so long: by enlisting some of the country’s most<br />

influential economists to perform cost-benefit analyses.<br />

In the case of cell phones, cost-benefit analysis works<br />

like this: economists assign dollar amounts to the lives of<br />

people killed annually in cell-phone–related car crashes,<br />

then compare that number to the amount of money that<br />

people behind the wheel spend on cell phones. Since,<br />

by the economists’ calculations, the money spent on cell<br />

phones is greater than the “value” of those human lives,<br />

they’ve concluded that cell phone use in cars shouldn’t be<br />

regulated.<br />

How do you put a price tag on a human life, you<br />

ask? Number-crunchers at think tanks such as the Harvard<br />

Center for Risk Analysis, the AEI-Brookings Joint Center<br />

for Regulatory Studies, and the Cato Institute have for<br />

the most part focused on workplace data. Dangerous<br />

jobs at construction sites, nuclear plants, and coal mines<br />

tend to pay more than low-risk ones; economists maintain<br />

that this wage difference indicates the price people<br />

are willing to pay to avoid death. Through some fancy<br />

math involving comparing risks to wages, that works out<br />

to be about $5 to $6 million.<br />

The lives of cell phone victims are by no means the<br />

only nontangibles with price tags. Throughout Priceless,<br />

Ackerman and Heinzerling show how regulators have determined<br />

costs for anything from a case of chronic bronchitis<br />

($260,000; EPA, 1997), to the preservation of national<br />

forests ($219,000; OMB, 2002), to IQ points ($8,346<br />

each; EPA, 2000).<br />

The authors oppose cost-benefit analysis and consider<br />

it too inherently biased to base decisions on. Yet in<br />

their critique they remain level-headed and clear, pointing<br />

out blatant errors in logic and calculations—criticisms<br />

that should be of value even to cost-benefit’s advocates.<br />

For example, calculating risk on the basis of wages<br />

assumes that workers can freely choose among several<br />

job options; and it assumes that those workers are perfectly<br />

informed of any risks involved. But when unemployment<br />

rates are high, workers end up taking whatever<br />

jobs they can. The cost of risk, then, says less about how<br />

much someone values his life than about the current state<br />

of the job market. And poor, uneducated people—in any<br />

job market—simply don’t have the access to low-risk jobs<br />

that wealthier people do. Ackerman and Heinzerling argue<br />

that, to correct for this problem, analysts should figure<br />

in the amount of money a rich person would have to<br />

be paid to <strong>take</strong> a risky job.<br />

Cost-benefit analysis invariably places different values<br />

on different lives. Rich people and young people are<br />

worth more than the poor and the elderly. And if you’re<br />

poor and elderly, you may as well give up: according to<br />

cost-benefit economics, it’s better to let old people die<br />

than to require pollution controls.<br />

At times, Ackerman and Heinzerling’s measured,<br />

point-by-point refutation of cost-benefit logic makes you<br />

want to continually poke <strong>your</strong>self to remember that all<br />

this is insane. Deconstructing cost-benefit analysis feels<br />

like getting into a serious debate over whether it’s better<br />

to kill <strong>your</strong> mother or <strong>your</strong> father. But Ackerman and<br />

Heinzerling’s book is crucial if for no other reason than<br />

the fact that so many people in power <strong>take</strong> such stuff<br />

very, very seriously.<br />

Frank Ackerman is an economist at the Global Development<br />

and Environment Institute at Tufts University.<br />

Lisa Heinzerling is a professor at the Georgetown University<br />

Law Center and has clerked for Judge Richard Posner<br />

and Justice William Brennan. We talked by phone in July<br />

2004, and I was immediately <strong>take</strong>n with both of them.<br />

—Carrie McLaren<br />

STAY FREE! 33 ISSUE NO. 23


STAY FREE!: Why do Bush and<br />

other opponents of environmental<br />

regulation like cost-benefit analysis<br />

so much?<br />

LISA HEINZERLING: Well, there<br />

are a bunch of reasons. One, it<br />

requires getting numbers for both<br />

costs and benefits. On the cost side,<br />

this is relatively easy; you can try<br />

to figure out the price of the equipment<br />

required for pollution control,<br />

for example. On the benefit<br />

side, however, there are a whole lot<br />

of important benefits that we can’t<br />

attach numbers to in the first place.<br />

For example, we can quantify the<br />

Making difficult decisions is<br />

what government and the courts<br />

have always done. There’s no<br />

evidence they have failed for<br />

lack of a mathematical formula.<br />

number of certain kinds of cancers<br />

that will be avoided, but there are<br />

other illnesses that can’t be quantified,<br />

and so they’re just left out of<br />

the analysis.<br />

STAY FREE!: They can quantify the<br />

cancer because...?<br />

HEINZERLING: Well, one reason<br />

is that there is a very clear end<br />

point—you get a tumor or you<br />

don’t get a tumor.<br />

FRANK ACKERMAN: Also, it’s the<br />

most thoroughly studied of the<br />

diseases.<br />

STAY FREE!: I guess pain would<br />

be something that you can’t really<br />

quantify because it’s so subjective.<br />

HEINZERLING: Pain or dermatitis,<br />

neurological effects, endocrine<br />

disruption—a slew of serious impairments<br />

can’t be quantified.<br />

ACKERMAN: But even for cancer<br />

cases, the medical data is only part<br />

of what cost-benefit analysts need.<br />

The benefits of pollution control—<br />

lives saved, cancer cases avoided,<br />

damage to ecosystems prevented—<br />

don’t have prices naturally attached<br />

to them in the market. That’s why<br />

we called the book Priceless.<br />

When the EPA did a cost-benefit<br />

analysis of arsenic regulation, it<br />

found that removing arsenic from<br />

drinking water leads to fewer cases<br />

of cancer. So what’s it worth to not<br />

die of cancer? What’s it worth to<br />

avoid a nonfatal case of cancer<br />

that leaves you in chemotherapy<br />

for years? To do the cost-benefit<br />

analysis, you’ve got to put numbers<br />

on both of those things. The EPA<br />

rose to this challenge and made up<br />

numbers. Apparently, it’s worth<br />

$6.1 million to not die of cancer.<br />

The value of avoiding a nonfatal<br />

cancer was estimated by saying,<br />

“We really don’t have a clue what<br />

it’s worth, so we’ll use the value of<br />

avoiding a case of chronic bronchitis,”<br />

which they made up by interviewing<br />

shoppers in a North Carolina<br />

mall in 1987. Those numbers<br />

were treated as hard science and<br />

have been carefully adjusted for<br />

inflation since 1987; unfortunately,<br />

they were never adjusted for common<br />

sense.<br />

STAY FREE!: Are those the only effects<br />

of arsenic in drinking water?<br />

ACKERMAN: No, those are just the<br />

only ones the EPA tried to put prices<br />

on. All the other diseases associated<br />

with arsenic were mentioned<br />

in passing, and then ignored. If<br />

you can’t come up with a number,<br />

it’s treated as zero; that’s where<br />

the great crunch comes in. Many<br />

things that people care about have<br />

no price attached to them. They<br />

don’t appear in the analysis.<br />

STAY FREE!: You’ve argued that<br />

putting prices on things that have<br />

no market value decreases rather<br />

than increases the information<br />

available to decision makers.<br />

ACKERMAN: If you have a long list<br />

of the health effects of arsenic in<br />

drinking water, that’s much more<br />

informative than reducing everything<br />

to a made-up dollar amount.<br />

STAY FREE!: You mentioned arsenic—wasn’t<br />

that the first time the<br />

U.S used formal cost-benefit analysis<br />

to write a major regulation?<br />

HEINZERLING: Yes. But the White<br />

House has for many years said that<br />

they’re going to require agencies to<br />

do cost-benefit analysis for very important<br />

rules. In recent years, that<br />

dynamic has really accelerated.<br />

STAY FREE!: What are some of the<br />

other regulations cost-benefit analysis<br />

has shaped?<br />

HEINZERLING: Every major rule<br />

now coming through the agencies<br />

is evaluated according to cost-benefit<br />

analysis. Let me offer one qualification,<br />

though: the Bush administration<br />

has in some cases avoided<br />

cost-benefit analysis, and troublingly,<br />

those are cases in which<br />

I think the cost-benefit analysis<br />

would have shown that regulation<br />

was a good thing. For example, air<br />

pollution kills so many people and<br />

the effects are so well-documented<br />

that virtually any regulation that<br />

reduces common air pollutants is<br />

going to turn out to be good in<br />

cost-benefit terms. Yet the Bush administration<br />

weakened the rules for<br />

power plants and factories without<br />

doing a cost-benefit analysis.<br />

ACKERMAN: I’m involved in a case<br />

now where the United Farm Workers<br />

are suing the EPA over its decision<br />

to allow very toxic pesticides<br />

to be used on crops. In effect, the<br />

Tim and Annette Gulick<br />

STAY FREE! 34 ISSUE NO. 23


$30,000<br />

$787,999,502<br />

$96,012<br />

EPA just said, “It’s so beneficial to<br />

the growers to use these pesticides<br />

that we don’t have to worry about<br />

evaluating the damage it does to<br />

farm workers.”<br />

STAY FREE!: After the Ford Pinto disaster<br />

(see sidebar, p. 37) and, more<br />

recently, Philip Morris’s analysis<br />

of smoking in the Czech Republic<br />

[which showed that smoking saved<br />

the government health care system<br />

money because smokers die earlier],<br />

are corporations any less likely<br />

to produce cost-benefit analyses on<br />

health and safety issues?<br />

HEINZERLING: Yes, I think corporations<br />

are leery of doing this kind of<br />

analysis internally, for their own<br />

decisions, because, if the public<br />

finds out, they get punished for it.<br />

ACKERMAN: But they’ll definitely<br />

lobby to modify the government’s<br />

calculations and offer competing<br />

analyses. When the government<br />

considered requiring power plants<br />

to install cooling towers in order<br />

to prevent the killing of fish, the<br />

power companies’ experts claimed<br />

that power plants don’t really hurt<br />

fish, because there are virtually an<br />

infinite number in the water, so if<br />

you kill some, more will grow.<br />

STAY FREE!: With new rules on<br />

“takings,” governments have to<br />

pay companies for passing laws<br />

that cost them money. So if I’m<br />

a real estate owner and the state<br />

passes an environmental protection<br />

law that devalues my property,<br />

I could sue the state. What effect<br />

has this had on the environment?<br />

HEINZERLING: Actually, they haven’t<br />

had a lot of success in requiring<br />

compensation for conventional<br />

pollution regulation. They’ve had<br />

some success with land use, saying<br />

“no, you can’t put something<br />

in this wetland,” or “you can’t put<br />

something in this coastal zone”<br />

without paying compensation, because<br />

conservative academics and<br />

think tanks have been pushing this<br />

in the courts for years. Still, it’s<br />

hard to win a takings claim. It’s really<br />

more that they’ve had a chilling<br />

effect. I think a lot of local and<br />

state governments worry that, “if<br />

we lose, we’re in real trouble.”<br />

STAY FREE!: Could you give me an<br />

example of an acceptable takings<br />

claim and an unacceptable one?<br />

HEINZERLING: The state can’t tell<br />

somebody, “you may not use <strong>your</strong><br />

land” without paying them for<br />

their property. On the other extreme,<br />

telling a company that it<br />

can’t discharge cyanide into a river<br />

has not been considered a taking.<br />

STAY FREE! 35 ISSUE NO. 23


ACKERMAN: The real sleeper in<br />

this area, though, is that language<br />

similar to takings is sneaking into<br />

international trade agreements.<br />

Buried deep in the seemingly boring<br />

language of NAFTA is a statement<br />

that companies can sue other<br />

governments directly, making a<br />

takings-like claim against the other<br />

country’s regulations. So U.S. companies<br />

can sue the Mexican and Canadian<br />

governments, for example.<br />

That has yet to shake out, but it has<br />

some frightening possibilities.<br />

STAY FREE!: Does cost-benefit ever<br />

include in its accounting who is<br />

paying the cost? Using the cooling<br />

towers example, say killing fish will<br />

cost $10 million in direct costs to<br />

the public, whereas cooling towers<br />

will cost zero in direct costs because<br />

the company has to pay for<br />

them. Why doesn’t the government<br />

conclude that the cooling towers<br />

are cheaper?<br />

ACKERMAN: Because cost-benefit<br />

analysis explicitly does not consider<br />

who’s paying. The theory holds<br />

that if there are net benefits for society<br />

as a whole, then the winners<br />

could compensate the losers. Distribution<br />

is considered a separate<br />

issue. All too often, the winners<br />

chose to keep the winnings and not<br />

share them with the losers, so the<br />

compensation remains purely hypothetical.<br />

STAY FREE!: Are the values of human<br />

lives based on how many<br />

friends or loved ones they have?<br />

ACKERMAN: No.<br />

STAY FREE!: What about insurance<br />

or wrongful death suits? If you<br />

have dependents, doesn’t that affect<br />

the value of <strong>your</strong> life?<br />

HEINZERLING: In the wrongful<br />

death context, the courts really<br />

only have money to give, so what<br />

they’ve developed are a series of<br />

ways of trying to figure out what<br />

survivors lost as a result of the<br />

death of a loved one. There, what<br />

they’ve come to say is that you’ve<br />

lost mostly income, maybe some<br />

medical expenses; they look at the<br />

true economic losses, and give the<br />

victims that amount. That’s why, in<br />

the context of the September 11th<br />

victims fund, for example, you see<br />

different amounts given to victims<br />

based on their income, because<br />

that’s the traditional way of doing<br />

it in the tort system.<br />

What we’re looking at is the<br />

prospective context—not looking<br />

backward, and trying to figure out<br />

how much to compensate someone<br />

who has been wronged, but how to<br />

figure out who you’re going to save<br />

in the future, or whether to save<br />

anyone.<br />

ACKERMAN: With cost-benefit<br />

analysis, you’d have tremendous<br />

political problems if you started<br />

differentiating by incomes. It’s the<br />

“old black woman” problem: if income<br />

was all that mattered, would<br />

pollution that just killed old black<br />

women be okay?<br />

HEINZERLING: That’s actually the<br />

reason why regulators turned away<br />

from income calculations—what’s<br />

called the “human capital” method—and<br />

toward “willingness to<br />

pay.” They said, “we’re going to<br />

try to value people the way they<br />

value themselves.”<br />

$30,000<br />

$679,666<br />

$353,556,002<br />

STAY FREE!: Are there any critics<br />

of cost-benefit analysis who don’t<br />

share <strong>your</strong> politics? Any conservatives<br />

oppose it?<br />

ACKERMAN: Conservative policy<br />

wonks generally love this stuff.<br />

STAY FREE!: How do mainstream<br />

environmental groups respond to<br />

cost-benefit analysis? Are they responding<br />

with their own numbers:<br />

“if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em”?<br />

STAY FREE! 36 ISSUE NO. 23


The Ford Pinto, one of the bestselling<br />

cars of the 1970s, had a defective<br />

gas tank with an unfortunate<br />

tendency to burst into flames<br />

in rear-end collisions. Instead of fixing<br />

the Pinto, Ford lobbied against<br />

federal regulation affecting fuel<br />

tank safety. As part of the lobbying<br />

effort, the company prepared<br />

a cost-benefit analysis. According<br />

to Ford’s engineers, it would cost<br />

$11* per car, or $137 million per<br />

year for the industry as a whole, to<br />

meet the rollover standard, while<br />

avoiding an estimated 180 deaths<br />

per year, along with an equal number<br />

of serious burn injuries and a<br />

few thousand wrecked cars.<br />

Ford’s cost-benefit analysis valued<br />

those lives at a mere $200,000<br />

apiece. That number was calculated<br />

by the National Highway and<br />

Traffic Safety Administration at the<br />

request of the auto industry, mainly<br />

on the basis of lost wages, plus<br />

medical and legal costs and a small<br />

amount for pain and suffering. At<br />

$200,000 per head, 180 deaths are<br />

“worth” $36 million, not nearly<br />

enough to “justify” a $137 million<br />

expenditure. As Ford saw it, spending<br />

an extra $11 per car to fix the<br />

gas tank just wasn’t worth it.<br />

Despite Ford’s lobbying, the<br />

gas-tank safety regulation was<br />

adopted. Ford responded by immediately,<br />

and inexpensively, making<br />

the 1977 Pinto safer. But the<br />

damage to the company’s image<br />

had been done. The public realized<br />

that Ford had knowingly produced<br />

a dangerous car, leading to<br />

Ford advertisements billed the<br />

Pinto as “the little carefree car”<br />

but neglected to add “with the<br />

exploding gas tank.”<br />

hundreds, perhaps thousands, of<br />

preventable deaths. Ford finally<br />

discontinued the model in 1980.<br />

—adapted from Priceless<br />

* Numbers are in 1972 dollars; to correct for inflation,<br />

multiply by 4.4. Thus the cost per car<br />

would be a bit more than $48 in 2003 dollars.<br />

THE PINTO DISASTER<br />

HEINZERLING: Good question. Certainly<br />

when Newt Gingrich’s Contract<br />

with America came to Washington,<br />

environmental groups united<br />

against a so-called “super mandate”<br />

that would have required<br />

cost-benefit analysis for health and<br />

environmental rules. And so you<br />

have that fairly recent experience<br />

when the environmental community<br />

was united against cost-benefit<br />

analysis. Today I hear among environmental<br />

groups some sense that,<br />

“well, this is inevitable, so let’s try<br />

to make it as good as we can.”<br />

STAY FREE!: What about “bioeconomics”?<br />

I’ve read that some environmentalists<br />

have been arguing<br />

for putting a price on natural resources<br />

in order to deter corporations<br />

from plundering the environment<br />

without paying. What has<br />

become of this idea?<br />

ACKERMAN: There have been little<br />

successes here and there, but the<br />

problem is that the market values<br />

of sustainable uses of natural<br />

resources are often much less<br />

than the values of damaging uses.<br />

What happens in, say, the Amazon,<br />

where it turns out that the value<br />

of preserving the trees for tourism<br />

and sustainable industries is<br />

nowhere near the short-term value<br />

of clear-cutting, selling the timber,<br />

and farming the land? To <strong>take</strong> another<br />

example, if you wanted to<br />

put a price on whales, you could<br />

add up the money people pay for<br />

whale-watching trips, but it turns<br />

out that’s fairly small. It’s easy to<br />

believe that commercial exploitation<br />

of whales could produce a lot<br />

more money than the revenues of<br />

whale-watching trips.<br />

My reaction to those who<br />

want to save nature by adding up<br />

its market value is, more power to<br />

them, but they’re not going to get<br />

us nearly as far as we need to go.<br />

STAY FREE!: You would prefer to<br />

get rid of cost-benefit analysis entirely,<br />

wouldn’t you?<br />

HEINZERLING: We think it’s fundamentally<br />

flawed and that refinements<br />

aren’t going to help in a<br />

meaningful way.<br />

ACKERMAN: The people who are<br />

pushing it are not just relying on its<br />

intrinsic flaws; they’re often cheating<br />

in their calculations. Environmental<br />

groups fighting a rear-guard<br />

action against cost-benefit analysis<br />

can always find ways in which the<br />

benefits numbers are too small, but<br />

that never wins the war.<br />

STAY FREE!: It reminds me of the<br />

divide between police estimates of<br />

the crowd size at a protest verses<br />

the organizers’ estimates. The two<br />

sides are never going to agree on<br />

the numbers, so it boils down to<br />

politics. To play devil’s advocate,<br />

proponents of cost-benefit analysis<br />

argue that obviously some ways of<br />

STAY FREE! 37 ISSUE NO. 23


preserving our environment or our<br />

health are cheaper and better than<br />

others, so can’t cost-benefit analysis<br />

help with that?<br />

HEINZERLING: It doesn’t necessarily<br />

help with that. What might help<br />

is setting a goal and then thinking<br />

about creative ways to get to that<br />

goal most cheaply. In some contexts,<br />

that might mean labeling a product<br />

rather than banning or restricting<br />

it. In other cases, when you’re talking<br />

about pollution, it might mean<br />

allowing emissions trading in that<br />

pollutant rather than requiring a<br />

particular control technology.<br />

ACKERMAN: From the beginning<br />

of modern environmental regulation<br />

in the early 1970s right to the<br />

present, there has been continuous<br />

discussion about the best, most innovative<br />

ways to regulate—a search<br />

for cheaper control technologies,<br />

simpler forms of record keeping<br />

and so on. I’m not convinced that<br />

cost-benefit analysis does anything<br />

to accelerate that process. The case<br />

for cost-benefit calculations so often<br />

depends on a strange rewriting<br />

of the past, as if the EPA was once<br />

run by Stalinist bureaucrats who<br />

delighted in capriciously spending<br />

money, and so now we have to<br />

bring in economic analysis to undo<br />

the damage. If you were alive then,<br />

or if you’ve read about the period,<br />

you know that this legendary era<br />

of extravagance never happened.<br />

So cost-benefit analysis is presented<br />

as solving a desperate problem that<br />

never actually occurred.<br />

HEINZERLING: The EPA in particular<br />

has accomplished a lot over the<br />

years. But it has gotten even smarter<br />

and more flexible—<br />

STAY FREE!: Huh? You think the<br />

EPA has gotten smarter under the<br />

Bush administration?!<br />

HEINZERLING: Oh, no, they haven’t<br />

done much of anything under Bush.<br />

But if you go through the Clinton<br />

years, there are a lot of ways in<br />

which they’ve gotten more flexible<br />

and have been very attentive<br />

to critiques; so I just find it ironic<br />

that they’re one of the most vilified<br />

agencies.<br />

STAY FREE!: How do you respond<br />

to economists who argue that costbenefit<br />

analysis helps in making difficult<br />

decisions? If closing off a particular<br />

waterway is going to harm a<br />

couple of types of fish but will protect<br />

a couple of other species, or it<br />

will devastate the livelihood of one<br />

community but not another, can’t<br />

cost-benefit analysis help with making<br />

the best choice?<br />

ACKERMAN: Making difficult decisions<br />

is what government and<br />

the courts have always done, and<br />

there’s no evidence that they have<br />

failed for lack of a magical mathematical<br />

formula.<br />

HEINZERLING: One of the subtle<br />

things that’s also lost when you<br />

decide things according to this formula<br />

is any sense of loss or tragedy.<br />

Martha Nussbaum, a philosopher<br />

at the University of Chicago, has<br />

pointed out that if you reduce everything<br />

to numbers you can easily<br />

think nobody was hurt by a regulation.<br />

It may be, in some cases, that<br />

you can’t please everybody and at<br />

the end of the day somebody is hurt,<br />

but cost-benefit analysis completely<br />

papers over that fact. Sometimes in<br />

human situations when you realize<br />

that people are being hurt you can<br />

actually come up with a solution<br />

that you wouldn’t have thought<br />

of if you were pretending that you<br />

were just trading money around.<br />

STAY FREE!: So do you think costbenefit<br />

analysis is going to be<br />

around for a while?<br />

HEINZERLING: Yes, unfortunately.<br />

There are too many people who<br />

make their living off of it [laughs].<br />

There are too many think tanks. It’s<br />

a huge industry. g<br />

Noah Scalin<br />

IS HUMANITY GETTING CHEAPER?<br />

MID-1970s 2003<br />

The estimated value of a human life<br />

isn’t what it used to be. Cost-benefit<br />

analysts used to price the average life at<br />

around $6.1 million, but recent studies<br />

have found much lower values, around<br />

$2 to $4 million. Why is the market value<br />

of human life declining? The numbers<br />

are based largely on workplace<br />

data. Male blue-collar workers—who<br />

fill virtually all the high-risk jobs—have<br />

faced worsening job opportunities since<br />

the 1970s. If people are desperate for<br />

work, employers do not have to pay as<br />

much to attract them to dangerous jobs.<br />

(The price of risking one’s life, in other<br />

words, is lower.) Moreover, Latino workers,<br />

whose numbers have grown rapidly,<br />

are filling some of the riskiest jobs; and<br />

Hispanics are less likely to seek higher<br />

pay for more dangerous work because<br />

of immigration status and language<br />

barriers. On a brighter note, dangerous<br />

workplace conditions have improved,<br />

leading to fewer worker deaths.<br />

STAY FREE! 38 ISSUE NO. 23


activist corner with helen belcap<br />

THIS WEEK: THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF<br />

SETTING YOURSELF ON FIRE<br />

The many advocates of costbenefit<br />

analysis argue that it<br />

helps people make all sorts<br />

of decisions, so we at <strong>Stay</strong><br />

<strong>Free</strong>! thought we’d try it ourselves.<br />

In conjunction with<br />

this issue of the magazine, we<br />

considered launching a media<br />

project to improve the plight<br />

of Wal-Mart workers. Liza<br />

Featherstone discusses some<br />

of the actions already underway<br />

(page 14): class-action<br />

lawsuits, for instance, and<br />

unionizing. However, since<br />

these options are problematic<br />

for one reason or another, we<br />

thought of a more innovative<br />

one: setting oneself on fire.<br />

Long popular among Asia’s<br />

monks as a means of expressing<br />

dissent, setting oneself on<br />

fire has never caught on in the<br />

United States. Averse to pain,<br />

American protesters choose<br />

“marches” or “voting” without<br />

ever evaluating the merits of<br />

self-immolation. But with the<br />

rise of cost-benefit analysis,<br />

this underdog media strategy<br />

may finally get its due.<br />

COSTS<br />

Human life: $6,100,000 1<br />

Clothing losses: $53.92 2<br />

Gasoline (1 gallon): $1.85 3<br />

Liter of Jack Daniels: $17<br />

Match: $.01<br />

TOTALS<br />

$6,100,072.78<br />

BENEFITS<br />

Media attention to cause<br />

through repeated airings of<br />

burning on news networks, lead<br />

stories on all local news outlets,<br />

circulation via blogs and email:<br />

$8,544,023. 4<br />

Savings from free cremation:<br />

$778 5<br />

$8,544,801.00<br />

BEST<br />

CHOICE!<br />

I should point out, however,<br />

that I would not make a very<br />

good martyr myself (too camera<br />

shy).<br />

1 As calculated in the EPA report The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970-<br />

1990, October 1997; via Ackerman and Heinzerling, Priceless (New Press, 2004),<br />

p. 61-62.<br />

2 Wal-Mart apparel at everyday low prices<br />

3 Department of Energy, 9/8/2004<br />

4 Based on an estimated $100,010 per minute in equivalent advertising time; at 3.5<br />

minutes average per national cable channel, or (3.5 x 215) 1023.344 / 347 x 3.<br />

5 Metropolitan Funeral Service Inc., New York, NY<br />

STAY FREE! 39 ISSUE NO. 23


VEHICLE FOR COMPARISON<br />

Feature > by Chris Boznos<br />

“E. coli…moves its whole length in two<br />

nanoseconds. If it were the size of a Volkswagen,<br />

it would be going four times the speed of light.” 51<br />

The VW Bug, with its nearly immutable<br />

design, has been driven all over the world<br />

and all over the movies for the better part<br />

of a century. You’d be hard-pressed to find<br />

someone who couldn’t <strong>pick</strong> its shape out of a lineup<br />

or, more realistically, a weedy Southern California<br />

backyard. On the web, phrases describing objects<br />

as about the size of a Volkswagen have achieved<br />

nearly pornographic levels of popularity. 52 Of<br />

course, it’s not the only product used as a reference<br />

for scale—comparisons with Buicks 53 and 747s are<br />

popular, too. Big Macs make a showing. None of<br />

them, however, can compete with the sheer number<br />

or variety 54 of comparisons made to the VW. 55 The<br />

Bug is the standard. It is the measure of things. It<br />

is the ruler itself.<br />

Science writers make the most use of the<br />

vehicle, deeming everything in or from space,<br />

made or conceived by man or God to be about the<br />

size of a Volkswagen. 56 The VW-size Mars Global<br />

Surveyor looks down at the planet with cameras<br />

capable of resolving VW-size objects 57 such as the<br />

STAY FREE! 40 ISSUE NO. 23<br />

“nearly” VW-size Spirit and Opportunity, 58 which,<br />

I should note, captured images of VW-size rocks 59<br />

in their travels. For a time, you could experience<br />

the thrill of the VW-size International Space<br />

Station capsule 60 as projected by the advanced<br />

VW-size IMAX projector. 61<br />

As seen in the table to the right, writers<br />

on every topic compare their subject to the<br />

Volkswagen. 62 I even get the impression that some<br />

authors feel the examination of a subject would<br />

be incomplete without a Bug comparison, even<br />

when that reference seems inappropriate. 63 This<br />

phenomenon manifests itself most plainly when a<br />

writer, struggling with an object impossibly out of<br />

line with the VW’s scale, makes do by referring to<br />

only a portion of the vehicle, turning the Bug into<br />

a divisible unit of measure. You probably already<br />

know that a manatee is about half the size of a<br />

VW, 64 but did you know that a mounted bison head<br />

is also that size? 65 Well, it is. Find those references<br />

helpful? All right, but is “half the size of a VW<br />

glove box” really a known quantity? 66 Is “the size


Defined on the internet as<br />

“about the size of a Volkswagen”<br />

of a VW bucket seat” 67 especially useful,<br />

as opposed to some other bucket seat?<br />

Other writers prefer to switch to the<br />

weight of their subject in the pursuit of<br />

some equilibrium with the Bug: “The USS<br />

Wisconsin was one of four ships having huge<br />

16-inch guns, large enough to launch a shell the<br />

weight of a VW Beetle 23 miles!” 68 But these weight<br />

comparisons prove less common, presumably<br />

because a limited number of people can heft the<br />

weight of a VW in their head, as you would,<br />

say, a bowling ball. Moreover, the advantages of<br />

the vehicle’s unchanging design no longer apply,<br />

because the Volkswagen’s weight is contingent on<br />

payload and fuel status.<br />

So what does all this mean? Should we<br />

attribute the extraordinarily persistent desire<br />

to describe objects in VW-terms solely to the<br />

popularity of the vehicle? Is it the snowballing<br />

popularity of the metaphor itself? Is it simply<br />

lazy writing? Or is something more going on?<br />

Maybe we’re missing a unit of measure. Maybe<br />

the volume in question is particularly useful for<br />

description and the VW filled a void? 69 If so, why<br />

not <strong>take</strong> what has already become a de facto<br />

standard of measurement and bestow upon it the<br />

status of a formal scientific unit, the Vw? 70 After<br />

all, it’s no less arbitrary than our current measures,<br />

both metric and English, and has already proven<br />

to be enormously relatable. Besides, if we do need<br />

a volume unit the size of a VW, why not use the<br />

friendly Bug as the standard—unless, of course,<br />

you would prefer to refer to “a couple of mounted<br />

bison heads.” g<br />

Extinct giant armadillos with spiked, clublike defensive tails 1 • A<br />

target that you can hit from 20 feet even if you can’t hit “beans” 2<br />

A 720-pound pig 3 • 4,000 pounds of concrete 4 • Jason, the 2,200-<br />

pound diving robot 5 • Nomad, a robot designed for identifying<br />

meteorites in the Antarctic 6 • The future state of an 800-pound<br />

award winning dairy goat 7 • The “best general description” of a<br />

Japanese maple, with the caveat that it will reach that description<br />

“but slowly” 8 • Leatherback turtles once considered to be sea monsters<br />

9 • An eerie and gargantuan grouper 10 • The projection of a<br />

dime with a new document reader 11 • Fictional giant, enormous,<br />

and loathsome spiders 12 • Fictional, and presumably radioactive,<br />

giant ’70s sci-fi tarantulas 13 • A brachiosaurus’s heart 14 • A blue<br />

whale’s heart 15 • A termite with which man must do battle in his<br />

nightmare 16 • A red balloon on which a woman must stand in her<br />

dream 17 • The death wish on the shoulder of a fictional and exiled<br />

yakuza boss 18 • The root ball of an oak tree wedged against the<br />

roof of Wayne and Norma Murry’s Texarkana home 19 The cookingoil-disposal<br />

unit of the restaurant responsible for inventing the<br />

fried <strong>pick</strong>le chip 20 • A “humming blue box” used for treatment<br />

of human waste at oil-drilling sites 21 • A computer disk drive circa<br />

1968 22 • A CAD workstation circa 1979 23 • Loudspeakers placed at<br />

a depth of 200 feet and dangerous to marine life 24 Loudspeakers<br />

playing the Animal House soundtrack 25 • A “floppy Afro wig”<br />

worn in conjunction with “combat boots” and a “plaid granny<br />

dress” by singer Macy Gray 26 • Potentially dangerous de-orbiting<br />

Iridium satellites 27 • A knoll “justifying the money spent on a full<br />

suspension” mountain bike 28 • Artichoke-like treetops found on<br />

“an extinct African volcano” 29 • A lava rock within the tide pools of<br />

Kahumoku (not found on visitor guides) 30 • A glacierlike mound<br />

of methane hydrates surrounded by clam beds 31 Walruses that<br />

require 54 kilograms of clams each day 32 • The lunar excursion<br />

module 33 • A boil sprouting on <strong>your</strong> back giving rise to <strong>your</strong> dermatologist’s<br />

concern 34 • The mole on Lincoln’s Mount Rushmore<br />

face, as described by Lincoln himself in a one-man-play about the<br />

president 35 • The tempting steak that “<strong>your</strong> friend wolfs down”<br />

even though she’s 15 pounds lighter and a dress size smaller 36 • A<br />

pile of “blood-smeared dog corpses…chests splayed open, hearts<br />

gone” 37 • “Serious” body builders 38 • What the “great gods of<br />

the free market have declared” a one-bedroom priced at a “mere<br />

two grand” should be 39 • The bentwood lobster traps used by<br />

Algonquin Indians that, by design, allow younger lobsters to escape<br />

40 • The flash produced by a certain type of firework that is<br />

“completely legal” if created for religious or ethnic purposes and<br />

not sold 41 • The world’s largest conventional bomb, the “daisy<br />

cutter” 42 • The Galileo probe 43 • The deadly Audrey II from the<br />

musical Little Shop of Horrors 44 • A “space mollusk” 45 • The upcoming<br />

Mars Science Laboratory 46 • Many of the thousands of<br />

unplotted minor planets in our solar system capable of causing<br />

“considerable damage” to the Earth on impact 47 • A proposed meteorite<br />

prior to exploding above northwest Indiana that created<br />

a debris field 80 miles long 48 • Debris from the Mir space station 49<br />

Debris from the shattered shuttle Columbia that fishermen saw<br />

splash into the Toledo Bend Reservoir on the Texas-Louisiana<br />

border 50<br />

STAY FREE! 41 ISSUE NO. 23


Notes:<br />

1. www.utc.edu/Faculty/Timothy-Gaudin/gaudin_educ_resint.html<br />

2. groups.google.com/groups?q=%22size+of+a+volkswagen%22&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-<br />

8&oe=UTF-8&selm=9am50g%24763%241%40xring.cs.umd.edu&rnum=6<br />

3. www.abqjournal.com/venue/personalities/99276trends10-19-03.htm<br />

4. A mere 400 pounds of concrete is about the size of a desk chair. www.eternalreefs.<br />

com/intown702.htm<br />

5. www.jhu.edu/~gazette/julsep97/aug1897/robots.html<br />

6. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/609905.stm<br />

7. The goat’s name is Chester. www.hsus.org/ace/19652<br />

8. www.worldplants.com/laceleaf.htm<br />

9. www.spaceforspecies.ca/track_real_species/leatherback_turtle/about/<br />

10. www.ms-starship.com/journal/mar00/23.htm<br />

11. www.piercelaw.edu/courtroom.htm<br />

12. www.gdm93.dial.pipex.com/spiders.htm<br />

13. www.cheftalk.com/content/display.cfm?articleid=3&type=article<br />

14. www.cami.jccbi.gov/AAM-400A/FASMB/HOP/health.htm<br />

15. A blue whale’s tongue is, by the way, about the size and weight of a full-grown African<br />

Elephant. can-do.com/uci/ssi2000/mammalsinternet/tsld002.htm. Also see endnote 63.<br />

16. www.tptermite.com/bugzilla_2.htm<br />

17. www.hominoid.org/skr100702.htm<br />

18. www.time.com/time/asia/features/heroes/<strong>take</strong>shi.html<br />

19. www.usatoday.com/weather/news/2000/wice1229.htm<br />

20. www.louisvillehotbytes.com/genny.shtml<br />

21. www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/fellows/peru0803/nf1.html<br />

22. www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4324<br />

23. According to the Lumagraph website, the CAD workstation in question was also “almost<br />

as noisy” as a VW. www.lumagraph.net/about.htm<br />

24. www.marineconnection.org/campaigns/sonar_sonar.html<br />

25. www.okanagansun.org/menu6.shtml<br />

26. www.startribune.com/stories/1377/4319777.html<br />

27. www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/article.cfm?Id=3<br />

28. www.mtbmind.com/scott.htm<br />

29. gorp.away.com/gorp/activity/climb/africa_berger2.htm<br />

30. www.kahumoku.com/mccabe.htm<br />

31. www.geotimes.org/dec02/NN_hydrates.html<br />

32. www.calacademy.org/calwild/2002fall/stories/whiskers.html<br />

33. arc.cs.odu.edu:8080/dp9/getrecord/oai_dc/1974343677/oai:inf.cs.cmu.edu:<br />

pub/161/318667<br />

34. starbulletin.com/2003/10/19/features/memminger.html<br />

35. reviewplays.com/abe_lincoln.htm<br />

36. www.honoluluclub.com/lifedesigns.php?ID=3<br />

37. Here the Volkswagen is used to refer to a sum total of objects. Compare with notes 64<br />

and 65. avar.org/alted/dadl.html<br />

38. www.donramon.net/articles/articles_level2_086.htm<br />

39. www.tenant.net/Alerts/Guide/press/nyt/bh061397.html<br />

40. www.sx2.com/choices12.html<br />

41. www.smithnetny.com/e-adboard/messages/385.htm<br />

42. www.nd.edu/~techrev/Archive/Spring2002/a8.html<br />

43. www.engin.umich.edu/alumni/engineer/00SS/jupiter.html<br />

44. www.adirondacktravel.com/mtco/archive/2002.html<br />

45. From the sci-fi book, Forge of the Elders:<br />

www.free-market.net/features/bookofthemonth/fboty2000.html<br />

46. www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040324-022701-3533r<br />

47. www.atscope.com.au/astrometry.html<br />

48. www.nwitimes.com/articles/2003/03/28/news/region_and_state/dd7b4e9acdf5e04c862<br />

56cf70013e895.txt<br />

49. www.keynews.org/archives/a_miralpha.htm<br />

50. www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/news/state/7565345.htm<br />

51. www.cc.gatech.edu/fac/mark.guzdial/squeak/oopsla.html<br />

52. A Google search turns up over 3,000 references to objects the size of a VW or Volkswagen.<br />

Interestingly, these are not always references to the ubiquitous Bug, but include comparisons<br />

with the far less common Rabbit, VW Bus, and Golf. Consider if there is something<br />

special about the Volkswagen brand itself. Are a disproportionate number of writer types<br />

familiar with or fond of Volkswagens? One could argue that, for at least the past 30 years,<br />

individuals (from the cultures responsible for disseminating the VW metaphor) driving VWs<br />

have been the more artistic or free-spirited of their societies, and so in theory more likely to<br />

write creatively. Moreover, references to VW-size spliffs and loudspeakers may support the<br />

notion that a majority of VW comparers are from a liberal subculture. The author found no<br />

references to “tax cuts half the size of a Volkswagen” or “VW-size moral traditions upon<br />

which the fabric of our culture depends” (Conservatives reading this: please insert theories<br />

about liberal bias in the media here).<br />

53. About 700 references.<br />

54. Other objects and products of reference are limited in their comparative function. For<br />

example, the Buick and the “football field” are only used to describe objects as large. In<br />

contrast, writers use Volkswagens as a purely scientific frame of reference and to describe<br />

objects as too small as well as too large.<br />

55. Some of the most interesting VW size references involve a convergence of the<br />

Volkswagen with one of these other popular objects of comparison. For example, an article<br />

on Post-Gazette.com referring to a mulching machine includes this quote: “A tree trunk<br />

the size of a Volkswagen can go through here and in 30 minutes, it’s 2-inch shred.” Also,<br />

AccessAtlanta.com instructs that you should “[k]eep a look out for a Big Mac the size of<br />

a Volkswagen Bug.”<br />

56. My space aficionado friend asserts that many satellites and spacecraft probably share<br />

the VW size because of the commonality of the delivery vehicle cargo bays (why the cargo<br />

bays would be the size of a VW was not explained).<br />

57. pr.caltech.edu/periodicals/EandS/articles/Mars%20Global%20Surveyor.pdf<br />

58. I should note that this reference is actually quite inaccurate—actual size of the rovers<br />

being much closer to that of a golf cart. www.thenewatlantis.com/archive/2/soa/mars.htm<br />

59. www.nytimes.com/2004/01/06/science/space/06CNDMARS.html?ex=1078722000&en=93<br />

db6b3f49ae7493&ei=5070<br />

60. www.smv.org/news/RELS/smvnews.html<br />

61. pr.caltech.edu/periodicals/EandS/articles/Mars%20Global%20Surveyor.pdf<br />

62. As the mass of material became clear, the author realized a proper examination of this<br />

subject would require substantial research and that he might not be interested in doing<br />

said research. Pretending that the popularity of the VW metaphor involved some nefarious<br />

cover-up, the truth of which he must pursue as implicitly commissioned by the children of<br />

the world, he was able to not only complete the article but daydream about two-fisted<br />

interrogations of the conspirators, from which he derived mild pleasure.<br />

63. Some subjects even appear to require it. With over 160 Google references to the size of<br />

a blue whale’s heart being that of a Volkswagen, I think I would have to be either a genius<br />

or a fool to attempt describing it any other way.<br />

64. ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/sstans/81469/s06litint.html<br />

65. www.sptimes.com/2003/03/02/Travel/Everything_under_the_.shtml<br />

66. In reference to “showers on the old smokeboats:”<br />

www.olgoat.com/substuff/dex159.htm<br />

67. In reference to spoons found in an Italian restaurant: www.metroactive.com/papers/<br />

metro/02.20.03/dining-0308.html<br />

68. In other references to battleship guns, the distance the projectile travels differs but<br />

the VW remains a constant: “Now decommissioned, the USS Wisconsin was one of four<br />

ships having huge 16-inch guns, large enough to launch a shell the weight of a VW Beetle<br />

24 miles.” www.shepherd-express.com/shepherd/20/50/columnists/gossip_net.html. Also,<br />

“This Battleship has the impressive might of a cannon whose ability to pinpoint its 2,100 lb.<br />

projectile, (the weight of a VW Bug automobile.), 21 miles.” members.tripod.com/~ButlerC/<br />

NEBerkIndex/NAdamsIndex/SB600PeteBergeron/SB600.htm. Finally: “BB’s with their 9-16”<br />

rifles capable of shooting a shell the weight of a VW 36 miles is some awesome firepower.”<br />

www.clubcobra.com/t41263-15-2.html<br />

69. Is it possible that human social or scientific development has been hamstrung in the<br />

past because of the lack of such an appropriate volume unit? Philosophers suggest that<br />

without the vocabulary to express an idea, individuals have a difficult time conceiving of<br />

that idea. Technologically, the pace of human invention certainly has accelerated since the<br />

Bug’s inception, in 1938.<br />

70. Consider these hypotheticals: “Office space for rent! 7.5 Vws. Ample underground<br />

parking available,” or “Raising the sunken cruise ship appeared an impossible task, it being<br />

a full ½ KiloVw undersea—and a choppy sea at that.”<br />

STAY FREE! 42 ISSUE NO. 23


Opinion > by Jack Silbert<br />

JERSEY DUTY<br />

Why hoopsters and hipsters shouldn’t abandon NJ for Brooklyn<br />

WHEN THE NEW Jersey Nets announced the team’s sale and<br />

eventual relocation to Brooklyn, community uproar ensued.<br />

Not in New Jersey, mind you. There are only five or six actual<br />

Nets fans in the Garden State. Yes, the team reached the<br />

NBA Finals in two consecutive seasons, and nearly reached<br />

the Finals this year. But they didn’t win, and in New Jersey,<br />

we demand only the best. This isn’t Buffalo, after all.<br />

Meanwhile, two rivers away, in Brooklyn, civic leaders<br />

are griping about the construction of a new arena and<br />

the subsequent havoc it would wreak on the local environs.<br />

A larger issue looms, however—a compelling reason for the<br />

Nets to remain in the Land of Sinatra, Springsteen, and Sopranos.<br />

Simply stated, no one should ever move from New<br />

Jersey to Brooklyn.<br />

I readily admit to a Jersey-centic bias. I am a Hoboken<br />

resident and have lived in New Jersey for two-thirds of my<br />

35 years. For more than a decade, I’ve socialized with my<br />

Generation X peers and their modern-day counterparts. I<br />

don’t know what this Generation is called, but they all own<br />

iPods. Some of us live in Brooklyn, others in Jersey City,<br />

or Hoboken, or Astoria, and there are hushed rumors of<br />

people actually dwelling in Washington Heights. But the<br />

shared dream, whether admitted or not, is to live in Manhattan<br />

proper. Walking to work! Stumbling home drunk, never<br />

waiting interminably on a freezing or sweltering train platform<br />

in the middle of the night! Manhattan, the shining city,<br />

our own Valhalla.<br />

The problem is, to be under 40 and to live alone in<br />

Manhattan requires two words. One of them is trust and the<br />

other is fund.<br />

So, we <strong>take</strong> halfhearted pride in our far-flung communities.<br />

Grimaldi’s has the best pizza! Maxwell’s has the best<br />

concerts! You want spanakopita? You came to the right place,<br />

buddy. Plus, the rent is low and it only <strong>take</strong>s us 15 minutes to<br />

get to work. Okay, it’s 45 minutes, but we’re fine with that.<br />

But Brooklyn had to go and sour the deal. They somehow<br />

won the Hipness Wars. Park Slope! Williamsburg!<br />

Greenpoint! Neighborhood doesn’t have a name? We’ll make<br />

one up! Come to the trendy new gallery/coffee shop/club/<br />

boutique! It’s next to the old-world bakery with an Eastern<br />

European name that we can’t pronounce. Later, come to the<br />

house party. It’s on that block you didn’t think was very safe<br />

eight months ago. Relax! It’s safe now.<br />

And why is this more hip than New Jersey? Three reasons<br />

come to mind. Brooklyn is in New York State, so there’s<br />

hipness by association. Also, it’s on the MTA subway system,<br />

so there’s one less train card to worry about. Lastly,<br />

a cab ride home from Manhattan to Brooklyn is relatively<br />

inexpensive. To <strong>take</strong> a taxi an equal distance across the Hudson<br />

River, you need to apply for a small-business loan.<br />

Never mind that Brooklyn’s own Robert Lanham, author<br />

of The Hipster Handbook (Anchor Books), was contacted<br />

by the venerable New York Times for an article on Jersey<br />

City’s newfound hipness (March 30, 2003). The article said<br />

that Lanham “thinks Jersey City has potential now that Williamsburg<br />

has nearly reached hipness senescence.” (That’s a<br />

very hip New York Times word, by the way. I looked it up,<br />

and it means “being old.”) But you probably never read that<br />

article, and why? It appeared only in the paper’s New Jersey<br />

section. Foiled again! Though I suppose you can easily question<br />

Lanham’s credibility. I saw his book in an airport bookstore’s<br />

humor section, and how painfully unhip is that?<br />

Brooklyn has plenty more going for it, don’t get me<br />

wrong. I have two fond memories of the borough from my<br />

own childhood. I vividly recall that it was the “fourth largest<br />

city in America” according to a sign shown in the opening<br />

credits of Welcome Back, Kotter. (That title seems to have<br />

passed to Houston, a city that already has an NBA team.)<br />

And at a bar mitzvah, my dad’s side of the family was described<br />

by the DJ as hailing from “Brooklyn, where the girls<br />

are good-lookin’.” So if you’re moving to the greater New<br />

York metropolitan area, and you <strong>pick</strong> Brooklyn, more power<br />

to you. No argument here.<br />

And if you live in New Jersey, and really want to leave,<br />

move to Manhattan. That makes sense. I see <strong>your</strong> logic and<br />

I applaud it. But please, if you must turn <strong>your</strong> back on New<br />

Jersey, do not move to Brooklyn. Three of my good friends<br />

have done exactly that, and a fourth is planning to do so.<br />

Why am I so adamant? New Jersey and Brooklyn are,<br />

simply put, identical. They might as well be merged. You<br />

want charming neighborhoods? Both places have them. Seaside<br />

attractions? Gentrified, pseudo-cool enclaves? Nearby<br />

urban blight? Loud, large men with absurd, outdated accents?<br />

Lengthy commutes on unreliable trains? Either region<br />

will suit you.<br />

So, Nets, stay put. Learn a lesson from the Dodgers.<br />

Brooklyn seemed hip to them too. And then they heard<br />

about Los Angeles. g<br />

STAY FREE! 43 ISSUE NO. 23


The Local Scene > by Tim Harrod<br />

THE MOUSE THAT WHORED<br />

Chuck E. Cheese has hung his hat in Brooklyn, but is it the borough’s<br />

newest fun spot or the latest scar of gentrification?<br />

As the stadium-shaped<br />

brick-and-glass edifice<br />

gradually rose<br />

at the Flatbush/Atlantic intersection,<br />

local residents<br />

hoped for exciting and<br />

convenient new shopping<br />

opportunities, even as we<br />

bemoaned gentrification.<br />

But when the Chuck E. Cheese logo first<br />

peeked from a third-story window, one<br />

thought came to my mind: Isn’t Chuck<br />

more of a Midwest thing? That thought<br />

was closely followed by a second: Am I<br />

an elitist for thinking that?<br />

Well, maybe. But think about it.<br />

What evokes Brooklyn more than a<br />

small, family-owned pizzeria? Just a<br />

few blocks up Flatbush from the newlyconstructed<br />

Atlantic Terminal, Antonio’s—like<br />

any number of local Italian<br />

pizzerias—has been serving up slices for<br />

over 50 years, its handcrafted neon sign<br />

a monument to longevity. The chain pizzerias<br />

like Pizza Hut and Sbarro are few<br />

and far-between for such a populated<br />

area; it’s as though they have the decorum<br />

to lay low in one of the world’s pizza<br />

capitals. On the other hand, if chain<br />

pizza in Brooklyn is inevitable, Chuck<br />

may be the one chain with the spunk<br />

and creativity to pull it off.<br />

Chuck E. Cheese has the same father<br />

as the video games he provides: Nolan<br />

Bushnell. Bushnell, who invented Pong<br />

in the early 1970s and went on to found<br />

Atari, parlayed some of his fortune into<br />

an ambitious one-spot family fun emporium<br />

offering pizza,<br />

a game arcade, and<br />

an automated floorshow.<br />

Passed over by<br />

Disney as a younger<br />

man, he channeled<br />

his disappointment<br />

into creating his own<br />

mouse mascot to<br />

serve as figurehead.<br />

The early Chucks, then called “Pizza<br />

Time Theater,” were groovy places,<br />

filled to the rafters with singing robots, a<br />

revolving cast of characters with a dash<br />

of sly humor. (Four dogs with Liverpool<br />

accents were called “The Beagles”; a<br />

lion in a gold jumpsuit was “The King.”)<br />

The overall experience was like seeing<br />

The Muppet Show live. Chuck himself<br />

was more Kermit than Mickey, a vestand-derby-wearing<br />

vaudevillian with an<br />

actual personality. The chain borrowed<br />

as much from Depression-era Coney Island<br />

as from Disney. Chuck even had a<br />

trace of a Brooklyn accent. Maybe it’s<br />

only fitting that he set up shop on Flatbush.<br />

Could Chuck E. be the large corporation<br />

that breaks the mold and is actually<br />

pretty good for the community?<br />

No, of course it couldn’t. Chuck has<br />

grown to 500 locations<br />

across North America,<br />

and in the new millennium<br />

you don’t get that<br />

big without thorough<br />

experience in cost-cutting<br />

and, all too often,<br />

customer-soaking.<br />

The first noticeable example of bottom-line<br />

economizing is the severely<br />

stripped-down stage area. In the entire<br />

restaurant (which the Park Slope Courier<br />

described as the largest in existence),<br />

there is a grand total of one robot—of<br />

Chuck E. Cheese himself—and over the<br />

years he’s apparently been focus-grouped<br />

down to a bland “big kid” archetype<br />

wearing a baseball cap and jersey. Any<br />

character traits that might set him apart<br />

from the herd of vacuous pop-cultural<br />

doofuses have been squeezed and sifted<br />

out by the demeaning mass-marketing<br />

instinct that kids won’t accept anything<br />

even remotely unfamiliar or challenging.<br />

In a bizarre quirk of design, Chuck<br />

appears to be wearing breezy summer<br />

shorts made from his own fur, and this<br />

is more attention-grabbing than anything<br />

coming out of his mouth.<br />

The remaining show space is<br />

rounded out by large TV screens showing<br />

music videos of Chuck and his supporting<br />

cast, now performed by actors<br />

in suits. Between songs, the Chuckbot<br />

engages in shtick (mostly jokes of the<br />

Laffy Taffy variety) with his pre-taped<br />

pals, who now appear in puppet form.<br />

There’s Jasper T. Jowls, a redneck<br />

dog stealing his voice<br />

from Green Acres’ Pat<br />

Butram; Pasqually, a<br />

mustachioed pizza chef<br />

with a borderline-offensive<br />

Italian accent and<br />

whose association with<br />

video games dooms<br />

STAY FREE! 44 ISSUE NO. 23


Photos by Claire Houston, with the exception of bottom right, by Chuck E. Cheese<br />

him to be confused with<br />

Mario; and some goddamned<br />

bird.<br />

There’s an irony<br />

here: Bushnell’s first great<br />

brainchild, Pong, revolutionized<br />

coin-op gaming<br />

partly because a video<br />

screen allows far more gaming possibilities<br />

than a pinball table. But another<br />

advantage, perhaps unintended by Bushnell,<br />

made it a billion-dollar industry:<br />

video consoles drastically cut down on<br />

the number of moving parts, reducing<br />

mass-production and maintenance to<br />

grunt work. The screen, the motherboard,<br />

and the controls are the only<br />

parts that might need to be replaced over<br />

the life of the machine.<br />

Many pinball aficionados sneered at<br />

video games as they started to displace<br />

vintage pinball at their local game halls.<br />

The tactile jitteriness of real metal and<br />

rubber colliding was far preferable to<br />

the synthesized beeps and buzzes of the<br />

new bastard child, and the specialized<br />

skill of pinball repair made it a nobler<br />

thing, a subculture unto itself. To this<br />

older generation of gamers, it was like<br />

seeing custom Les Paul guitars gradually<br />

replaced by Casio keyboards.<br />

Now, years after Bushnell sold<br />

Chuck E. Cheese and<br />

moved on, his original<br />

innovation has<br />

returned to compromise<br />

his second. Replacing<br />

a video screen<br />

is much easier than<br />

servicing a Pasqually<br />

automaton, and you<br />

can tell one of the<br />

hourly-wage kids to<br />

do it rather than fly<br />

in a specially trained<br />

technician. But this<br />

robs Chuck’s place<br />

of its magic; we all<br />

have video screens in<br />

our homes. Making a<br />

special trip to watch<br />

TV doesn’t have the<br />

same exciting ring as going to see the<br />

singing robot show—in fact it’s rather<br />

depressing. (But smart business: I’m sure<br />

customers enthralled by an exciting show<br />

spend less on games.) The crowning insult<br />

comes between the mixed-media performances:<br />

As a curtain conceals Chuck,<br />

A photo of the author, courtesy<br />

of Chuck E. Cheese<br />

STAY FREE! 45 ISSUE NO. 23<br />

the video screens show<br />

humanoid puppets<br />

performing threadbare<br />

skits in praise of Hi-C<br />

Sour Blast fruit drink.<br />

In other words, paying<br />

customers are subjected<br />

to commercials.<br />

I guess it’s supposed to be a mitigating<br />

factor that Chuck himself doesn’t endorse<br />

products.<br />

If the Chuck management had invested<br />

more in the floor show, it would<br />

help offset Chuck’s other major sin: mediocre<br />

pizza at exorbitant prices. A thick<br />

Sicilian-style crust is drizzled stingily with<br />

tomato sauce and lightly sprinkled with<br />

cheese—it may very well represent the legal<br />

minimum that one can put on bread<br />

and still advertise it as<br />

pizza. Slices are not available;<br />

the closest menu<br />

item is an individual-size<br />

pie at roughly the same<br />

size—but triple the cost—<br />

of a slice at Antonio’s.<br />

The game room is<br />

a mixed bag. On the plus side, there’s<br />

Centipede, Qix, and Missile Command<br />

for fans of golden-age arcade games, and<br />

a big selling point in the chain’s ads is<br />

that all games cost a single token—even<br />

the giant sit-inside,<br />

18-wheeler racing<br />

game. But by far the<br />

most floor space is reserved<br />

for the carnivalstyle,<br />

ticket-awarding<br />

games—Skee-Ball and<br />

its cousins. The chain<br />

has ingeniously placed<br />

three stages between<br />

cash and prizes to<br />

help cloud the amount<br />

of money dropped to<br />

obtain that Spider-<br />

Man sticker. Cash is<br />

exchanged for sheetmetal<br />

tokens, then converted<br />

into tickets at a<br />

rate dependent on the<br />

customer’s skill. These<br />

tickets are then exchanged for prizes at<br />

predictably confiscatory rates. In the Atlantic<br />

Center restaurant, a new intermediary<br />

step saves precious employee manhours<br />

that were once spent weighing<br />

bowls of tickets: big winners can now<br />

feed their pasteboard strips into a mechanical,<br />

ticket-eating monster, which<br />

dispenses a paper chit bearing the number<br />

of tickets offered. One can view this<br />

with admiration (a clever, efficient way to<br />

give the customer added fun) or cynicism<br />

(making the kids do the work).<br />

Some of the ticket games recall<br />

the kinetic, contraptional quality that’s<br />

missing from the floorshow. There’s a<br />

charmingly retro mechanical baseball<br />

game where tiny sheet-metal men run<br />

the bases, and a wacky game of slapping<br />

plastic eggs onto a conveyor belt. But<br />

the larger and more complex a game is,<br />

the stingier it seems to be with the ticket<br />

payout. Skee-Ball may offer the lowest<br />

payout in the house; to make things<br />

worse, the whole restaurant may see you<br />

playing it on a video screen.<br />

The less skill a game<br />

requires, the closer it<br />

comes to a form of gambling,<br />

and there’s a genre<br />

of ticket game that not<br />

only devours tokens but<br />

puts the kid’s winnings<br />

largely in fate’s hands: the<br />

token pusher. The player drops in tokens<br />

in hope of pushing other tokens,<br />

which push other tokens, which eventually<br />

plunge into the payout chute. One<br />

must play these to understand the appeal<br />

of ripe, juicy overhangs of tokens<br />

ready to collapse if only nudged another<br />

millimeter. These games devour tokens<br />

at roughly one every ten seconds and<br />

seem especially cruel. Worse, the player<br />

doesn’t retrieve the tokens from the bottom<br />

but receives the equivalent in tickets<br />

in a baffling standard of double forms of<br />

fiat currency.<br />

As I cruised the game room, two<br />

kids who had apparently run out of tokens<br />

panhandled me. A third was eager<br />

to operate the shift stick for me on the<br />

18-wheeler game. (I guess he wasn’t spellbound<br />

by the one-robot show, either.)<br />

On the wall farthest from the stage,<br />

there’s a single pinball machine: the new<br />

and hi-tech “Simpsons Pinball Party,”<br />

loaded with moving plastic props and<br />

digitized character voices. It’s the only reminder<br />

in the restaurant that Pong didn’t<br />

actually kill pinball but pushed it to adapt<br />

in order to compete. And that motivation<br />

is what’s missing from Chuck’s new<br />

world order. Fun-seeking families would<br />

probably reject Chuck for nobler chains<br />

that cut fewer costs, if there were any.<br />

continued on page 63


Travelogue > by Mikki Halpin<br />

IT’S NO MOON RIVER<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! <strong>take</strong>s a canoe trip down the Gowanus Canal,<br />

Brooklyn’s own little backyard sewer<br />

The first time I canoed down the Gowanus Canal, all I<br />

could think about was murder. I was in the back of a<br />

double canoe, and the potential victim, my friend Marisa,<br />

was seated in front, happily ignorant of the calculations I was<br />

making about tides and the movement of corpses in water,<br />

as she exclaimed about horseshoe crab sightings and the odd<br />

feeling of seeing gentrification’s backside.<br />

The Gowanus Canal was built in 1848, originally to drain<br />

the marshlands of South Brooklyn, and until the mid 1940s<br />

it supported a thriving maritime economy based on goods<br />

ranging from concrete to local oysters. When trucking took<br />

over as a mode of transportation, industry left the area and<br />

gentrification set in across most of it. Today, the canal winds<br />

through neighborhoods of million dollar brownstones in<br />

Carroll Gardens, past sites of the newly built Lowe’s and Home<br />

Depot stores in the still-struggling Gowanus neighborhood,<br />

until it finally empties out into the Gowanus Bay and New<br />

York Harbor.<br />

Travelling the canal by canoe is a wonderful way to get<br />

a glimpse of local history, while also getting whiffs of the<br />

pollution crisis affecting the health of the waterway and its<br />

inhabitants. (One local fish, the tom cod, has so adapted to<br />

its current environment that it will die when placed in water<br />

that is free of PCBs.) Our trip was facilitated by the Gowanus<br />

Dredgers Canoe Club, which runs free canoe trips, bike tours,<br />

and an education program. As the name implies, the club also<br />

lobbies for a government clean-up of the canal.<br />

Despite its Olympic status, canoeing in still waters<br />

requires few skills—the ability to push small amounts of liquid<br />

backwards with a piece of wood will propel you, eventually if<br />

inefficiently. In a double canoe, the rear paddler is in charge of<br />

steering. All that is asked of the front paddler is to match the<br />

stroke of the rear paddler, and to switch sides when asked. If<br />

the front paddler attempts to help steer, the canoe will not make<br />

the required turn, or it will veer too sharply, and occasionally<br />

spin all the way around. As a result of Marisa’s enthusiasm and<br />

desire to steer, I spent much of our trip cursing her silently.<br />

Our guide for the trip was Owen Foote, a local architect<br />

and the most visible member of the club. Calling Owen a canal<br />

enthusiast is quite an understatement. He knows the local<br />

wildlife, and why horseshoe crabs are important for medical<br />

research. He knows that Lowe’s and Home Depot were both<br />

bound by the city to put in waterfront walkways, that he rarely<br />

sees anyone on the Lowe’s walkway, and that the Home Depot<br />

one hasn’t been built yet. He knows when local businesses have<br />

been dumping illegally, and what that will do to hinder the<br />

canal’s slow return to health.<br />

Two things made the Gowanus sick: pollution and the<br />

BQE. The freeway meant the advent of a trucking economy, and<br />

signaled the end of the Gowanus as a commercial waterway. The<br />

pollution is a more complicated story. In the canal’s maritime<br />

heyday local neighborhoods grew and more and more waste<br />

was piped into the canal throughout the late 1800s and into<br />

the mid 1900s. A flushing tunnel, built in 1911, temporarily<br />

alleviated the problem until it was abandoned in 1961. The<br />

flushing station, located at Butler Street, brings water from the<br />

Buttermilk Channel (the channel that separates Brooklyn from<br />

Governor’s Island) and sends it through the canal, theoretically<br />

swooshing the PCBs, asbestos, raw sewage, garbage, and other<br />

bad things out to sea. Since the station’s reactivation in 1999,<br />

the canal is “flushed” six times per day, but this process doesn’t<br />

remove the layers of toxic sediment that lie at the bottom.<br />

Other bits of history are more fun. Turning into the First<br />

Street Basin, and paddling towards Third Avenue, we are within<br />

spitting distance of the outfield of Washington Park, the home<br />

of the Brooklyn Superbas, later known as the Trolley Dodgers<br />

and then, of course, the Brooklyn Dodgers. In addition to the<br />

First Street Basin, there are basins at 4 th , 6 th , 7 th , and 11 th Streets.<br />

The basins, originally built for drainage, are currently home to<br />

a variety of items and activities. In the Third Street Basin, we<br />

canoed in and around a former dry dock, now in ruins. Another<br />

shows signs of drug deals—graffitti, trash, hypodermics.<br />

The Sixth Street Basin holds a surprise: a sort of miniresort<br />

built along the side of what appears to be a trucking<br />

company. There’s a yacht and a ski-doo tied up at the floating<br />

dock, and a gazebo and lights up on land. There are children’s<br />

toys scattered around. It looks like something you’d see in Bay<br />

Shore as you ferry out to Fire Island, not here in the middle<br />

of Brooklyn. No one seems to know who the owner of the<br />

resort is, only that the property owner’s name is “Norm.” Even<br />

Owen can’t help me out on this one, and I must admit going on<br />

several subsequent canoe trips solely to boggle at this set up.<br />

In one sense, the yacht is a sign of hope. Someone believes<br />

in the Gowanus enough to build a little weekend getaway right<br />

on it. Someone, apparently, even lets his or her children play<br />

on or near the water. So many parts of New York’s waterfront<br />

are pretty but hermetically sealed against the rivers—the muchlauded<br />

Hudson River Park along the Manhattan’s west side<br />

Edward Sudentas, Wired New York<br />

STAY FREE! 46 ISSUE NO. 23


practically screams “look, but don’t touch”—that it’s refreshing<br />

to see any kind of life on the water. But it’s also depressing. I<br />

suddenly see a vista of rich yachters motoring up and down the<br />

canal, dressed in white and waving to their other millionaire<br />

friends as they head to a members-only clubhouse in Red Hook<br />

for drinks, dahling.<br />

Right now, the canal faces a variety of futures. If it<br />

continues to heal and has environmentally sensitive dredging,<br />

and if dumping laws are enforced, it has the potential to be<br />

a viable habitat for all kinds of wildlife and marine life. If<br />

green manufacturing and other industries are encouraged, it<br />

could bring much-needed jobs to the area. If Owen and other<br />

waterfront groups have their way, it could become a place<br />

where the public has access to and stewardship of the water.<br />

If Barbara Corcoran gets in on the act, we’ll be seeing ads for<br />

waterfront properties in Carroll Gardens in the “luxury real<br />

estate” pages of the New York Times Magazine.<br />

I’m pondering all this as the trip comes to an end and we<br />

pull the canoes up at the 2 nd Street put-in. Owen and Marisa<br />

have discovered some common acquaintances and interests and<br />

are chatting merrily. I am proud of myself for not killing either<br />

of them, really. g<br />

To book a canoe trip or learn more about the Gowanus Canal,<br />

visit www.waterfrontmuseum.org/dredgers/home.html.<br />

(c)1999 www.gowanuscanal.org<br />

STAY FREE! 47 ISSUE NO. 23


AMY BALKIN: So why don’t you introduce <strong>your</strong>selves?<br />

MANOLO MORAGON: I’m Manolo Moragon, M-a-n-o-l-o.<br />

M-o-r-a-g-o-n. He’s Christopher McGrath.<br />

CHRIS McGRATH: C-h-r-i-s-t-o-p-h-e-r M-c-G-r-a-t-h.<br />

MORAGON: About six years ago, when I was in college, I<br />

worked at a place called Berwick Company. So did Chris. It<br />

was owned by a division of Flavor Companies. They made<br />

flavors for industrial purposes, vanillas, and color applications.<br />

We got the job because my mom was a secretary. She<br />

started off as a secretary but ended up running the place.<br />

Kind of fluky how we all sort of fell into the flavor.<br />

JAMES HARBISON: You had no ambitions of being a flavor<br />

tester?<br />

MORAGON: No, it’s just a job.<br />

MORAGON: Well, we’d make a flavor that was so strong, it<br />

wouldn’t even taste like blueberry. If you dropped a couple<br />

drops in a big vat of whatever, you’d make it taste like blueberry.<br />

McGRATH: You know, it’s a concentrate.<br />

HARBISON: So did you know whether it was right just by<br />

smelling it?<br />

McGRATH: We went mainly by the formulas.<br />

MORAGON: Yeah, it was like cooking.<br />

McGRATH: If you do the steps wrong, you screw it up.<br />

MORAGON: Either it would be cloudy, or there would be<br />

little crystals forming in it or something.<br />

Former factory workers discuss the<br />

mysteries of flavor science. Interview<br />

by Amy Balkin and James Harbison,<br />

from Lackluster (issue #1).<br />

HARBISON: Well, once a flavor tester, always a flavor tester. I<br />

mean, do you <strong>pick</strong> up a Dorito and think, “Blue No. 7”?<br />

MORAGON: No. We didn’t deal with food. We didn’t even<br />

taste things.<br />

McGRATH: We’d get formulas. The formulas would either<br />

be faxed or Xeroxed to us by one of our affiliates, Globe<br />

Extracts, and I guess before that Andy Berwick was a chemist.<br />

Berwick eventually sold the company to Knudsen and<br />

they bought Globe. Knudsen makes milk, yogurts, and they<br />

have flavors, which makes sense. We would make the stuff in<br />

the bottom of the yogurt that makes it taste like blueberry.<br />

But it’s not like you dip <strong>your</strong> finger in it and “Mmmm! Blueberry!”<br />

BALKIN: It wouldn’t taste like blueberries until you added it<br />

to yogurt?<br />

McGRATH: So we’d have to pour it out and start over.<br />

MORAGON: It was like we were doing chemistry without<br />

actually doing all the math.<br />

HARBISON: Sounds like the kind of job that might inspire<br />

some experimentation.<br />

McGRATH: Well, but we’ve never been like “Oh, instead of<br />

two, let’s <strong>take</strong> 16 ounces of blueberry oil and use half as<br />

much propylene glycol as we should use.” I mean, you never<br />

do that to the actual product. And we actually never did it as<br />

tests because we didn’t want to waste it.<br />

MORAGON: If you look at deodorant, you’ll see one of the<br />

main ingredients is propylene glycol. We’ve added so much<br />

of that in so many things, you wouldn’t believe!<br />

BALKIN: What is it?<br />

STAY FREE! 48 ISSUE NO. 23


MORAGON: It’s like a clear petroleum-based product you can<br />

add to food products, or shampoo—look at <strong>your</strong> shampoo.<br />

BALKIN: It’s a base?<br />

McGRATH: Yeah, it’s a base, like a neutral base.<br />

MORAGON: If you stuck <strong>your</strong> hand in it, it gets warm like<br />

those sex oils and stuff, ’cept it would taste like cinnamon if<br />

we added a little cinnamon flavor to it.<br />

HARBISON: Did it come in huge drums?<br />

MORAGON: Fifty-five gallon drums. With forklifts and huge<br />

tanks and stuff.<br />

McGRATH: Propylene wasn’t super expensive, not compared<br />

to the oils or certain powders.<br />

BALKIN: I was wondering about that, about getting injured.<br />

McGRATH: There was spearmint oil, which smelt really good,<br />

but don’t touch it. Don’t get it on <strong>your</strong> hands.<br />

BALKIN: What happens if you get spearmint oil on <strong>your</strong><br />

hands?<br />

McGRATH: Uh, actually it wouldn’t burn so much. It would<br />

be this sort of chill feeling.<br />

MORAGON: You know that stuff they make pepper spray out<br />

of? We had that in big jugs and you’d make barbecue flavor<br />

out of that. I remember once I was washing a drum out and<br />

it had some of that resin in there. It was stuck to the side<br />

’cos it was really gooey. I sprayed some steamy water on it,<br />

and—“shhhh”—maced myself.<br />

McGRATH: It was corrosive.<br />

MORAGON: At Chinese restaurants, you’ll notice things look<br />

really bright orange. We used to make this stuff called egg<br />

shade flavor, and we’d sell it to companies.<br />

BALKIN: What’s it called?<br />

McGRATH: Egg shade No. 2. It was like imitation color of an<br />

egg yolk. Bright red color was big around the holidays, too.<br />

BALKIN: So did it smell really strong where you worked?<br />

McGRATH: The plant smelled like whatever we were working<br />

on. Normally it smelled like vanilla.<br />

MORAGON: If you went to a certain area in the plant, it<br />

would smell like peanut butter. We had different rooms<br />

where we kept certain things under refrigeration, like a lot of<br />

the Aldehyde C-18, almond flavor. Pure peppermint oil—if<br />

you get that on <strong>your</strong> skin, it burns.<br />

HARBISON: I was gonna ask you about cleaning up.<br />

MORAGON: We had a big step ladder and a huge tank. We<br />

used to make three hundred gallons at a time. I remember<br />

one time I was on the ladder standing over this thing with<br />

all this alcohol and these vapors; it had heating coils on the<br />

inside and a big propeller that would stir it around. When I<br />

was getting down, I almost passed out [mumbles something<br />

to the effect of]… lots of industrial accidents, but I don’t<br />

want to… you know, they’re bankrupt now. I don’t want to<br />

get them in trouble.<br />

BALKIN: So you worked mostly with natural flavors or mostly<br />

with chemicals?<br />

MORAGON: Mostly chemicals. We’d have to mix our own<br />

food colorings. Food coloring came in two forms: powder<br />

and granulated. You had big warning labels on it saying<br />

“CONTAINS LEAD AND ARSENIC!” Supposedly it was a<br />

STAY FREE! 49 ISSUE NO. 23


yproduct of burning coal, this fine ash.<br />

McGRATH: Yeah. A lot of the times when it’s granulated it<br />

looks like those rocks you see on lawns, only more broken<br />

down, like pebbles.<br />

MORAGON: Sort of like Fruity Pebbles, but clumped<br />

together more.<br />

HARBISON: Let’s say you had a little vanilla left over in the<br />

trough bucket. Did you have a big stump hole to dump out<br />

toxic waste?<br />

McGRATH: We would save it. It was worth money. Most of it<br />

wasn’t refrigerated. We’d put it in the gallon bottles, unless<br />

it was an orange or strawberry. If it was a fruit flavor, then<br />

we would usually put it in the refrigerator.<br />

MORAGON: We did a lot of flavors for yogurts.<br />

BALKIN: So why’d you quit?<br />

MORAGON: I got bored. And it's kind of a toxic job, really.<br />

BALKIN: Did you ever get <strong>your</strong> hands stained?<br />

MORAGON: You’d blow <strong>your</strong> nose in the shower, see green<br />

or yellow come out. It was pretty nasty.<br />

McGRATH: Yeah. You spit blue. [Laughter.] Imagine what<br />

<strong>your</strong> lungs look like.<br />

HARBISON: So you were doing it how many days a week?<br />

MORAGON: Almost every day, I think. I would work from<br />

eight to ten or eleven or twelve, depending on my college<br />

schedule, ’cos my mom worked there. At first I started out<br />

part-time in the warehouse. I hurt my back doing warehouse<br />

work so then I got into making flavors. And we used<br />

to make ’em bootleg-style over the sink. It was crazy. You<br />

McGRATH: Blueberry, boysenberry…<br />

MORAGON: Mother’s Cookies, Otis Spunkmeyer, what<br />

else? That pink stuff, Wright’s Pink Popcorn, that shit that<br />

you see at the ballpark. We made the pink shit that holds it<br />

together. That was us. It’s pretty much powdered sugar and<br />

food coloring and a little bubble gum flavoring.<br />

HARBISON: Did you get any symbols of appreciation from<br />

manufacturers? Any T-shirts? Any free products?<br />

MORAGON: The company did, but we never got anything. I<br />

mean if we had degrees in chemistry, we would have made<br />

forty-thousand a year, but we didn’t.<br />

HARBISON: Doing the same work you did?<br />

MORAGON: Yeah. We were just college students.<br />

know those sinks: you’d press the floor and wash <strong>your</strong><br />

hands. They were circular, we’d get our water from there<br />

’cause we really weren’t set up to make flavors, we were in<br />

limbo. We’d get a special order from really good customers<br />

and we had to come through ’cos they’d only order<br />

maybe one gallon a year and we’d ream ’em for that. Or<br />

four gallons a year and we’d ream ’em like a hundred dollars<br />

a gallon.<br />

McGRATH: I ended up accidentally four-folding 96 gallons<br />

of Vanilla 3124 one time and it turned out the formula was<br />

old. We would add BHA.<br />

BALKIN: Oh, BHA, BHT?<br />

MORAGON: Yeah. It’s that kind of stuff.<br />

BALKIN: Well that’s not too poisonous, is it?<br />

STAY FREE! 50 ISSUE NO. 23


MORAGON: It’s not too good for you. I’d have to read the<br />

Cal OSHA manual now to really get the gist. We had a Cal<br />

OSHA manual but I don’t think we ever looked up stuff.<br />

McGRATH: We didn’t want to know. It was like “Oh, get the<br />

formula, make the flavor.”<br />

BALKIN: So you made fruit flavors. Did you ever make beef<br />

flavor?<br />

MORAGON: Very rarely. Every now and then you’d get a cat<br />

food company and they’d want you to make liver flavor.<br />

McGRATH: Make it out of emulsion.<br />

MORAGON: Butter was pretty bad.<br />

McGRATH: Something you don’t want to have spilled on<br />

you: tuna emulsion. You go into McDonald’s, people are<br />

like, “What’s that smell?”<br />

MORAGON: But that diacetyl stuff. One tiny little drop<br />

on <strong>your</strong> clothes and you stunk. Like I said, I was going to<br />

school, I got a tiny drop on my shoe, and I swear, everybody<br />

at the front of the room was like, [sniff] “Who’s got the<br />

popcorn?” But if you sat next to me, it’d be like “Ugh! Who<br />

stepped in shit?”<br />

HARBISON: Did you wear uniforms?<br />

MORAGON: We wore smocks, like a printer’s smock, and<br />

we had hair nets and goggles and gloves and respirators, but<br />

most of the time didn’t use all that stuff. We should have<br />

had an eye bath.<br />

McGRATH: We just had sinks. I remember a time when<br />

Manolo was making almond extract and you spilled Aldehyde<br />

C-18 in <strong>your</strong> eye and screamed. I thought you lost<br />

<strong>your</strong> eye.<br />

MORAGON: You have to rinse for 15 minutes.<br />

MORAGON: Everyone’s smelling their pits and you’re going,<br />

“Hmmm, I hope nobody notices.” It’s pretty nasty.<br />

McGRATH: There was this flavor that was really brutal to<br />

work with—Butter 20—and there was this one ingredient,<br />

diacetyl, that, if you inhaled it, would make you vomit.<br />

MORAGON: You know those movies where they have little<br />

metal bottles that people put things in and cap ’em? It came<br />

in a bottle like that. But you wouldn’t want to get that shit<br />

on you. You can’t describe it, it smells so bad.<br />

McGRATH: Yeah, you’d put a few drops of diacetyl for<br />

twenty gallons of Butter 20 and then mix it with egg salads<br />

and butter derivatives, which is clumpy buttery half-liquid.<br />

It looked like runny cottage cheese and smelled horrible. If<br />

you had the dry heaves, that would do it.<br />

McGRATH: Otherwise, there goes <strong>your</strong> cornea.<br />

BALKIN: So did you ever work with Blue No. 2?<br />

MORAGON: Oh yeah. Red 40, Blue No. 2, Yellow No. 5.<br />

All that stuff.<br />

McGRATH: Blue No. 1, mostly.<br />

BALKIN: Aren’t some of those colors banned?<br />

McGRATH: Yes, Red No. 3. We worked with that.<br />

MORAGON: We did Red No. 40, mostly. Yellow 5, Blue No.<br />

1, and—<br />

McGRATH: Green No. 3.<br />

STAY FREE! 51 ISSUE NO. 23


MORAGON: And we would make colors from those colors,<br />

black and red and different tones.<br />

McGRATH: Purple from Blue No. 1 and Red No. 40 combined.<br />

BALKIN: So did you guys ever make smoke flavor?<br />

MORAGON: Yeah, you’d use birch tar oil. Really strong stuff,<br />

I hear it’s pretty bad for you, too. Cancerous.<br />

McGRATH: That’s the kind of stuff you wouldn’t want to get<br />

on <strong>your</strong> hands.<br />

MORAGON: That’s when we wore gloves. We almost always<br />

wore gloves. There’s certain flavors I couldn’t make. I don’t<br />

like bananas, so I couldn’t make banana flavors. You know<br />

that goopy stuff that comes out of a tube and you can blow<br />

bubbles with it?<br />

McGRATH: Super Elastic Bubble Plastic.<br />

MORAGON: Yeah, remember that smell? It was really strong.<br />

It’d go right up <strong>your</strong> nose. Well, we had flavors that smelled<br />

like that. Like strawberry. It would “scheeoo” right up <strong>your</strong><br />

nose, that’s how concentrated it was. It was a Carmi flavor.<br />

They were the worst. And you’d use those a lot for hard<br />

candy and stuff like Jolly Ranchers, Now and Laters.<br />

HARBISON: I have a question. When I was a kid, my mother<br />

was very cheap, so she’d buy us generic popsicles in summer.<br />

They didn’t pretend to be cherry flavor or anything like that,<br />

they would say RED. Do you think that’s more honest?<br />

MORAGON: I still drink Kool-Aid, you know. I love artificial<br />

flavors, and I know what they’re made of. If it is bad it<br />

wouldn’t be legal, right? Hopefully somebody tested it somewhere.<br />

HARBISON: Like you?<br />

MORAGON: I don’t think they put that much money into<br />

testing, personally. I drink a lot of Kool-Aid and it’s got the<br />

worst thing for you as far as bad food colorings go— I mean<br />

it took me three brushes to get the red out. But I’m still here,<br />

you know? And I didn’t pee red, so it’s all good. g<br />

Know anyone in “south central” Brooklyn (Park Slope, Prospect<br />

Heights, Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Boerum Hill) with<br />

an unusual job? <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! is looking for good people to interview<br />

for our gigs column. Email cm@stayfreemagazine.org<br />

with any suggestions. Thank you very much.<br />

STAY FREE! 52 ISSUE NO. 23


STAY FREE! 53 ISSUE NO. 23


Interview > by Emily Pugh<br />

Reel People<br />

Chances are those old Laurel & Hardy prints sitting in<br />

<strong>your</strong> basement aren’t nearly as valuable as <strong>your</strong> mom’s<br />

home movies. The founders of Home Movie Day talk<br />

about amateur films and what they can teach us.<br />

These days, you think of home movies as quaint and fairly uninteresting. The film technology with which they were<br />

made seems hopelessly outmoded in the age of digital video, and the idea of screening someone else’s memories<br />

brings to mind the cliché of being forced to watch the neighbors’ film of their trip to Niagara Falls. However, though<br />

we all have preconceptions of home movies, few of us have seen them firsthand. It turns out that the reality of<br />

home movies proves much more compelling than the clichés associated with them (think less Niagara Falls and<br />

more backyard dragqueen party). And though film may seem out-of-date, Kodak still makes Super 8mm film, and<br />

many of us have old films of summer vacation or our 8th birthday party stashed by our radiators or in our damp,<br />

moldy basements—and the world’s film archivists are collectively cringing. • In 2002, a group of them, members of<br />

the Association of Moving Image Archivists (AMIA) Small Gauge and Amateur Film interest group, decided to do<br />

something about it. Their solution: Home Movie Day, a day when people can bring home movies, whether they<br />

found them in the basement or at a flea market, to a local venue and have them projected in public by professional<br />

film archivists. • The first Home Movie Day was held in August 2003 and was so successful that this year’s event was<br />

expanded to 40 cities around the world, including Tokyo, London, and Albuquerque. <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! interviewed Andrew<br />

Lampert and Diana Little who, along with Katie Trainor, were the New York hosts of the event.—Emily Pugh<br />

STAY FREE!: What are the preservation<br />

issues associated with home movies<br />

and how does Home Movie Day<br />

address these issues?<br />

ANDREW LAMPERT: Well, a lot of<br />

people have videotapes of their home<br />

movies that they transferred from film<br />

way back when, and they think that,<br />

since it’s on video, they don’t need to<br />

keep the film anymore. In reality, film<br />

properly kept lasts longer than video,<br />

and if the video player eats the tape,<br />

you need the original film to make a<br />

new copy. Sadly, when people <strong>take</strong><br />

their films in to get transferred onto<br />

video, they often leave the films, and<br />

the processing places throw them<br />

away. The goal of Home Movie Day<br />

is to wave a flag and say, “Hey, home<br />

movies need to be <strong>take</strong>n care of.”<br />

DIANA LITTLE: Also, as archivists, we<br />

generally hesitate to project films that<br />

STAY FREE! 54 ISSUE NO. 23


are unique or fragile, which most of<br />

these home movies are. If films get<br />

broken or damaged in the projector,<br />

they are lost forever. Every time you<br />

project a film, especially if you don’t<br />

know what kind of condition the projector<br />

is in, you’re essentially taking<br />

tiny bits off the life of the film. You’re<br />

scratching it, sometimes mangling it<br />

if it gets caught. That’s why we use<br />

Home Movie Day to give people the<br />

opportunity to see their home movies<br />

projected in a setting where we can<br />

assure them to some degree that the<br />

films will not be damaged.<br />

LAMPERT: Yes, and while we very<br />

much want people to preserve their<br />

films, we do also encourage them to<br />

make a video or DVD copy to use for<br />

viewing. So Home Movie Day is as<br />

much about education as it is about<br />

entertainment.<br />

STAY FREE!: Do most film preservationists<br />

and archivists think home<br />

movies are worthy of preservation?<br />

LITTLE: No. Film preservation in practice<br />

really means duplicating films,<br />

whether it’s for archives or commercial<br />

interests, and no one is going to<br />

spend that kind of money and time<br />

on a film that doesn’t have commercial<br />

value. Most film archives can’t<br />

really afford to recognize the cultural<br />

history embedded in these captured<br />

everyday moments. There’s just not<br />

enough space in archives and there’s<br />

not enough money in it.<br />

STAY FREE!: If their primary value is<br />

as a cultural document, why is it that<br />

these films can’t simply be transferred<br />

to video or DVD and be as valuable?<br />

LAMPERT: Because film will last longer<br />

than any video or digital medium.<br />

With digital media, there are new formats<br />

or software upgrades every six<br />

months, whereas film has been pretty<br />

much the same since its invention.<br />

Super 8mm projectors, for example,<br />

have been the same since 1965.<br />

STAY FREE!: How do you see this ritual<br />

of watching home movies as part<br />

of the larger issues of preserving and<br />

archiving them?<br />

LAMPERT: It’s a huge part. I’ve been<br />

collecting home movies for fifteen<br />

years and one of the great kicks is<br />

to see what a “normal” family looks<br />

like or what a child’s birthday party<br />

is like, because I never had birthday<br />

parties! There’s definitely an element<br />

of voyeurism involved. Also, showing<br />

these films creates a sort of mini<br />

community among the people watching<br />

them together. On Home Movie<br />

Day, I always ask people to talk about<br />

their films. I want them to say, “oh,<br />

that’s Grandma” or to tell us what’s<br />

going on. This idea of community is<br />

actually a really important part of<br />

Home Movie Day. And in New York<br />

City, in particular, the idea of community<br />

is especially interesting. We<br />

have a hugely diverse group of people:<br />

white, black, Puerto Rican, Dominican,<br />

Asian. And people within each of<br />

these cultures make their own, often<br />

unique kinds of home movies.<br />

STAY FREE!: So what are the differences<br />

between the home movies made<br />

by these diverse groups of people?<br />

LITTLE: I tend to feel that there are<br />

more similarities than differences. It’s<br />

interesting, for example, to see how<br />

people in these films will act in very<br />

specific ways. People who might be<br />

reserved or shy normally will suddenly<br />

get wacky and start making<br />

funny faces or waving their hands<br />

around.<br />

LAMPERT: There are a number of reactions<br />

or behaviors that you see people<br />

do again and again in these films, such<br />

as waving at the camera. What I am<br />

interested in is atypical behavior or<br />

activities that are unique to a particular<br />

culture. For example, one home<br />

movie shot about four or five years<br />

ago by a Chinese woman shows her<br />

family conducting a traditional Chinese<br />

ceremony at her husband’s grave<br />

a year after his death. I was fascinated<br />

to watch this very private, culturally<br />

specific moment in a public forum.<br />

Most of the time, home movies lie by<br />

painting an overly rosy picture of life.<br />

They don’t show Dad coming home<br />

drunk, or me not having a birthday<br />

party. The typical subject matter is<br />

vacations at beaches, children’s birthday<br />

parties, Christmas parties—people<br />

gathering together for some significant<br />

event.<br />

STAY FREE!: What about the aesthetic<br />

of these films? What can you say<br />

about how they look or the filmmaking<br />

techniques used to make them?<br />

STAY FREE! 55 ISSUE NO. 23


STAY FREE! 56 ISSUE NO. 23


LAMPERT: There are certain aesthetic<br />

elements common to most home<br />

movies: shooting with a hand-held<br />

camera, for example; use of available<br />

light, lack of sound. But this brings up<br />

the question of what exactly is a home<br />

movie. At the last Home Movie Day,<br />

we showed a film by an artist of his<br />

trip to Paris. He used gels and various<br />

other filmmaking techniques that<br />

made it clear he was a trained filmmaker.<br />

Some members of the audience<br />

objected to it, and a heated discussion<br />

started over what exactly constitutes a<br />

home movie. I was arguing that if the<br />

filmmaker is willing to call it a home<br />

movie, it counts as a home movie.<br />

LITTLE: If home movies have to be<br />

spontaneous and unplanned, then the<br />

film one guy brought in of his son’s<br />

birth in the early ’60s would not have<br />

counted as a home movie. It had<br />

titles and he and his wife “acted” in<br />

it. Someone else brought in a home<br />

movie of her daughter’s birthday party<br />

in the East Village from the ’80s that<br />

was spontaneous, but also heavily<br />

manipulated. She modified the speed<br />

and shot single frames, for example,<br />

which are not techniques you see in<br />

classic home movies.<br />

STAY FREE!: So I guess there’s a rather<br />

ambiguous line between “home movies”<br />

and “homemade movies”?<br />

LAMPERT: Well, a couple of years ago<br />

I put together a show called “Art Is<br />

Life and Life Is Art” that was made up<br />

of films by noted experimental filmmakers<br />

that blurred the line between<br />

art films and home movies. Actually,<br />

that’s the most common criticism of<br />

experimental films: that they are just<br />

amateur movies or just home movies.<br />

So <strong>your</strong> question is interesting because<br />

I don’t really know the answer to it.<br />

STAY FREE!: Every year that Home<br />

Movie Day has been held, you’ve<br />

attracted more and more people.<br />

What kinds of people are coming? Is<br />

it all ages, all walks of life?<br />

LITTLE: Oh yeah. This year a lot of<br />

people in their late twenties and early<br />

thirties came with footage of themselves<br />

as children. One guy brought<br />

in footage of his bris! You see a lot<br />

of people bringing in footage of<br />

themselves they’ve never seen before<br />

because their parents packed away the<br />

Super 8 projector when they were 7.<br />

STAY FREE!: So ultimately what would<br />

you like to see happen with these<br />

films? Is the ultimate goal a museum<br />

or archive of home movies?<br />

LAMPERT: Yes, some of us have been<br />

talking about founding a home-movies<br />

museum, a place where people<br />

can donate their home movies and<br />

in return receive a digital or video<br />

copy to have for their personal use.<br />

The originals would then be kept<br />

in proper archival conditions. The<br />

museum would have an open-access<br />

policy, and accept films from all over<br />

the world. After all, these are important<br />

documents of our cultural history.<br />

The films are not shot from the<br />

point of view of the media, for example.<br />

This is our own documentation of<br />

what life was like in, say 1967, not<br />

“The Cold War” or “Nixon meeting<br />

Khrushchev” but what was happening<br />

in people’s everyday lives.<br />

STAY FREE!: Are there any especially<br />

funny or unusual home movies that<br />

you’ve seen?<br />

LITTLE: This year someone brought<br />

in a movie from San Francisco in the<br />

early 1970s—a sort of impromptu<br />

FIVE TIPS FOR HOME MOVIE CARE<br />

1<br />

Transfer <strong>your</strong> films<br />

to a master tape (e.g.<br />

BetaSP or DigiBeta), and<br />

make viewing copies (VHS<br />

or DVD) from that master.<br />

Andrew, Diana, and Katie recommend<br />

Brodsky & Treadway<br />

(littlefilm.com) in Massachusetts<br />

or the suggestions<br />

provided at filmforever.org<br />

under Resources and Links.<br />

Make sure you don’t discard<br />

the original film. Of course,<br />

making a video transfer is<br />

not the same as preserving.<br />

Store <strong>your</strong> films in a<br />

2 cool, dry place. Do<br />

not store in the attic<br />

(hot/inconsistent temperature)<br />

or basement (humid).<br />

We also advise against storing<br />

in the refrigerator or<br />

freezer, mainly because cold<br />

storage of processed film requires<br />

special precautions<br />

and some long-term commitment<br />

to maintenance.<br />

3<br />

Keep all films away<br />

from direct sunlight,<br />

and store those with magnetic<br />

soundtracks away from<br />

magnets and magnetic fields.<br />

4<br />

Store <strong>your</strong> films flat<br />

(horizontally) in nonairtight,<br />

labeled containers.<br />

The individual cardboard<br />

boxes they are currently in<br />

are okay, but if you want to<br />

be even safer, get new reels,<br />

cores, and storage containers.<br />

(See Equipment Suppliers<br />

at filmforever.org.)<br />

Do not project <strong>your</strong><br />

5 films unless you have<br />

<strong>take</strong>n pains to ensure<br />

that they won’t be damaged.<br />

Safe projection of unique archival<br />

film entails the careful<br />

inspection, repair, and cleaning<br />

of both the film and the<br />

projection equipment.<br />

STAY FREE! 57 ISSUE NO. 23


drag ball in his backyard.<br />

LAMPERT: I’ve seen a lot of movies from<br />

the ’50s of particularly wild New Year’s<br />

parties.<br />

LITTLE: One of my favorite home movies<br />

of all time is one our friend Chad found,<br />

which he calls “Penis Film.” It’s old footage<br />

of teenage boys hanging out somewhere<br />

in Michigan, getting drunk, playing<br />

in their band, and frequently exposing<br />

themselves to the camera.<br />

LAMPERT: One of my favorite home<br />

movies is of a Hispanic wedding party.<br />

You see the bride and groom in the<br />

receiving line and then the camera pans<br />

to the right and there’s a bunch of shirtless<br />

guys with beer cans in their hands.<br />

Here’s a culture I’m not a part of, but I’d<br />

like to go to their parties!<br />

STAY FREE!: At Home Movie Day, while<br />

I was watching the film of the Dutch<br />

couple getting married in the 1970s, I<br />

found myself making up stories about<br />

who they were and how they met.<br />

LAMPERT: Yes, home movies are very<br />

much about interpretation. Each one has<br />

a narrative, though it may seem “plotless.”<br />

Often the viewer has to supply it,<br />

but sometimes the people in the films create<br />

little stories or parodies themselves.<br />

LITTLE: I find that watching strangers’<br />

home movies gives me a warm feeling<br />

too. You find <strong>your</strong>self thinking, “these<br />

are just normal people.” Maybe these<br />

people are forgotten to everybody but<br />

their grandchildren; maybe they are<br />

dead or far away, but they still exist in<br />

these films.<br />

LAMPERT: People have different haircuts<br />

or different pants depending on what<br />

year it is, but you see them doing the<br />

same things in these films that you’re<br />

doing right now. Home movies show us<br />

that we haven’t really changed that much<br />

over the years. g<br />

Sound off<br />

Pissed off about something<br />

in this issue? Share you<br />

thoughts on the <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>!<br />

bulletin board:<br />

www.stayfreemagazine.org<br />

Your ad here<br />

(cheap!)<br />

Call (718) 398-9324<br />

cm@stayfreemagazine.org<br />

Seen <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>!'s<br />

Illegal Art Exhibit?<br />

www.illegal-art.org<br />

Bridget Regan<br />

WEB & GRAPHIC<br />

DESIGN<br />

TIP #46: When you run out of ideas,<br />

throw in an adorable monkey.<br />

Or call <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! Because we don’t just produce<br />

money-sucking magazines—we make sensible<br />

things as well: websites, logos, newsletters,<br />

postcards, advertisements, posters, and flyers.<br />

Affordable rates. Stellar references. No hidden<br />

fees or other nonsense. Visit carriemclaren.com<br />

for work samples. Or contact Carrie McLaren<br />

at (718) 398-9324 or cm@stayfreemagazine.org<br />

for an estimate.<br />

Or, in this case, a baby orangutan.<br />

STAY FREE! 58 ISSUE NO. 23


Eugene’s Hangouts continued from page 31<br />

P.S. 321 Flea Market<br />

I love going to flea markets and antique shops to look at odd<br />

crap. Toy guns, old machines, magazines, pants for teens, love<br />

letters from babies to colleagues from the 1920s—it’s all here.<br />

(180 7th Avenue, weekends)<br />

Bombay Grill<br />

Probably the best Indian food in Park Slope. The staff is<br />

friendly and the vindaloo is spicy like a beautiful woman (who<br />

has been marinated in hot peppers). I go there for Sunday<br />

brunch with friends a lot. A great tradition (like Hanukkah,<br />

but without any legend). Even as I write this I kind of want<br />

to go there. And I was there two days ago! Shit! (351 7th<br />

Avenue, 718-768-7777)<br />

Blue Ribbon<br />

A great seafood restaurant that stays open late. Seafood is<br />

my favorite food, so if you want to surprise me at a show,<br />

bring some shrimp. (Please don’t.) Sometimes when I’m at<br />

Great Lakes, I’ll run in for an oyster. Blue Ribbon has some<br />

of the most attentive—but not intrusive—service I’ve ever<br />

seen. Almost spooky. I think they are trained in some odd way,<br />

broken down and then remade as the perfect waitstaff. When<br />

friends visit and want to treat me to a meal, we’ll end up there<br />

at 3 a.m. and have supper. (280 5th Avenue, 718-840-0404)<br />

Commonwealth<br />

Ray’s bar. Who’s Ray? How dare you! He used to be the<br />

bartender at Great Lakes, and <strong>pick</strong>ed the music for its world<br />

famous indie-rock jukebox. He opened his own bar, which has<br />

a slightly modernized 1940s feel and an indie-loving jukebox<br />

as well. Spacious and a great place to meet psychologists and<br />

bookworms who like French kissing as much as knowledge!<br />

And now Ray has some snacks. Plus he’s full of great stories<br />

and smiles. (497 5th Avenue, 718-768-2040)<br />

The Gate<br />

For those who don’t like all the youngsters at Great Lakes, the<br />

Gate is their sanctuary. There are times when you want to talk<br />

to someone aged 27–33 and not 21–24. And that’s where the<br />

Gate comes in. Twenty-five- and 26-year olds are not welcome<br />

at either place, sorry. They hang out at Mexican Sandwich<br />

Company, having great food, but no human contact. (321 5th<br />

Avenue, 718-768-4329)<br />

Nana<br />

Thanks for opening near me, friend. Very cheap lunch specials?<br />

Are you sure? Great. Delicious sushi? Okay. Keep talking.<br />

Tuna with quail egg and ponzu sauce? I’m listening. Hot hot<br />

hot Hapaji Shrimp with Pumpkin? What else? Volcano Roll?<br />

What’s in that? Bullshit. Who would dare? Nana, that’s who.<br />

(155 Fifth Avenue, 718-230-3749) g<br />

STAY FREE! 59 ISSUE NO. 23


MY NEW FAVORITE THING<br />

365 Days Project<br />

www.ubu.com/outsiders/365/<br />

Oh, happy day! Those weird old records<br />

I once scoured thrift shops for<br />

have made their way to the web, where<br />

they all seem to appear in this singular<br />

mp3 archive. Louis Farrakhan singing<br />

about a transvestite, calypso-style (“Is<br />

She Is, Or Is She Ain’t?”), a promotional<br />

“rock” version of the Ford Motors<br />

warranty, out<strong>take</strong>s from a Christian<br />

radio show, “Hidden and Satanic<br />

Messages in Rock Music”: it’s all here.<br />

It’s like listening to Irwin Chusid or the<br />

Bran Flakes on WFMU, but without the<br />

annoying banter. (In fact, Otis Fodder<br />

of the Bran Flakes produced the site,<br />

and Irwin is a contributor.)<br />

There are 365 mp3s in all, one for<br />

each day of 2003, when the site was<br />

active. (It’s no longer being updated,<br />

but there’s plenty of stuff here to keep<br />

you coming back.) My personal favorites<br />

include “Let’s Make a Record,” a<br />

stripped-down gospel number by one<br />

Sister Gertrude Morman; “Maybe It’s,”<br />

a jaunty pop song by Esther Rolle, aka<br />

Esther from Good Times; the DeZurik<br />

(Cackle) Sisters, an amazing yodeling<br />

duo from the 1930s and 1940s; and the<br />

hilarious recordings Van Morrison made<br />

in 1968 to get out of a contract with<br />

Bang Records, including “Ring Worm,”<br />

“Want a Danish,” and “You Say France<br />

and I Whistle” (which consists of him<br />

saying, “I whistle, you say France. No,<br />

you say France and I’ll whistle. No, I’ll<br />

say France,” and on and on). And to<br />

think that I’ve only covered up to the<br />

first week in March!<br />

Each entry in the archive has images<br />

and background info, often with<br />

links to additional references and songs.<br />

I downloaded “Diary of an Unborn<br />

Child” on a related site, for example,<br />

and was treated to a deeply disturbing<br />

anthem by evangelical Mark Fox, singing<br />

from the point of view of an aborted<br />

fetus. Of course, once you get off track<br />

like this, you may never find <strong>your</strong> way<br />

back, as one amazing mp3 library leads<br />

to another and pretty soon <strong>your</strong> day is<br />

shot. But you won’t find a better way to<br />

waste time. —Carrie McLaren<br />

Patton Oswalt<br />

Feelin’ Kinda Patton CD<br />

Those who watched the reality series<br />

Last Comic Standing and thought,<br />

“surely this is not the cream of American<br />

standup” are gently directed to the alternative<br />

comedy scene that’s been incubating<br />

outside of NBC’s ability to know or<br />

care. Seeded by the late Bill Hicks and<br />

kept alive by the likes of David Cross<br />

(whose two-disc Shut Up, You Fucking<br />

Baby! is an excellent primer), the underbelly<br />

of standup has proved a fertile<br />

marketplace of heartfelt opinions and<br />

fresh observations brewing below the<br />

populist Muzak of LCS.<br />

On his debut CD, Patton Oswalt<br />

(best known from the sitcom King of<br />

Queens) joins the elite of this scene by<br />

taking his audience on an uncommonly<br />

cheerful journey through humanity’s<br />

darker facets. His penetrating wit and<br />

adept wordsmithery will restore the faith<br />

of anyone disillusioned by modern standup—Cross<br />

himself could <strong>take</strong> a page from<br />

Patton’s brisk pacing and word economy.<br />

Even Bush-bashing, an automatic cliché<br />

in most standup circles, <strong>take</strong>s on its own<br />

life in Oswalt’s deft comparison of Bush<br />

supporters to deluded groupies who believe<br />

a fellated Michael Damian actually<br />

cares about them.<br />

One of the geek world’s most visible<br />

supporting actors (among other roles,<br />

he’s the Dungeons and Dragons spaz<br />

getting maced in a Reno 911 spot played<br />

ad nauseum on Comedy Central), Patton<br />

reveals his formidable Gen-X memory in<br />

lovingly detailed remembrances of PAAS<br />

Easter egg dye and Stella D’Oro’s nightmarish<br />

1970s Breakfast Treats commercial,<br />

without ever veering toward universally<br />

remembered hack premises like<br />

Gilligan’s Island or The Brady Bunch.<br />

When Patton curses, it’s literate and<br />

gleefully warped, but maybe the truest<br />

testament to his skill is that the falldown-funniest<br />

track on the album, “My<br />

Christmas Memory,” contains no cursing<br />

at all. Nevertheless, after two seasons<br />

STAY FREE! 60 ISSUE NO. 23


of recycled “am I right, people?” filler<br />

on NBC, it’s surprisingly refreshing to<br />

hear a comic scream, “Your twat smells<br />

like a baby’s coffin!” —Tim Harrod<br />

Edward Hunter, Brainwashing<br />

(first published in 1956)<br />

I came across Brainwashing in a secondhand<br />

bookstore in San Francisco.<br />

It’s a pulpy-looking paperback edition<br />

from the early sixties, with cover copy<br />

describing it as “The True and Terrible<br />

Story of the Men who Endured and Defied<br />

the Most Diabolical Red Torture.”<br />

With that kind of sensationalist dressing,<br />

I expected it to be a bit of Cold<br />

War anti-communist hysteria, and it<br />

certainly starts off that way. The author,<br />

journalist Edward Hunter, begins<br />

with a discussion of Pavlov’s famous<br />

conditioning experiments, for which<br />

he consults a psychiatrist named Leon<br />

<strong>Free</strong>dom and a close personal friend,<br />

Ayn Rand. He proposes that scientists<br />

in the Soviet Union have found a way<br />

to use Pavlov’s experiments on humans:<br />

“Any human activity, from the<br />

flow of saliva to an embrace to murder,<br />

could be clinically predetermined in<br />

politico-medical laboratories by connecting<br />

it with a shouted or written<br />

slogan, a hand signal, a smear word, or<br />

the color of a man’s skin.” This sounds<br />

a lot like the original film version of<br />

RED<br />

“Polenta with wild mushrooms is decadently<br />

rich; salmon is expertly roasted; crème<br />

brûlée is irresistible. If you haven’t been here<br />

yet, you should be seeing Red.”<br />

—Time Out New York<br />

“Chef Mark Shenk makes a delicious habit<br />

of serving creative comfort food in small,<br />

neighborhoody places at small, neighborhoody<br />

prices.”<br />

—New York<br />

“A delicious original.”<br />

—Brooklyn Papers<br />

78 Fifth Avenue between St. Mark’s and<br />

Prospect Place • Park Slope, Brooklyn<br />

Sunday, Tuesday to Thursday 5:30–10 p.m.<br />

Friday & Saturday 5:30–11 p.m. • Closed<br />

Mondays • (718) 789-1100<br />

STAY FREE! 61 ISSUE NO. 23


The Manchurian Candidate, in which a<br />

brainwashed Korean War veteran falls<br />

into a trance whenever he is shown the<br />

Queen of Hearts, obeying whatever instructions<br />

he is given at that time—even<br />

instructions to kill.<br />

But in the personal stories of prisoners<br />

of war that make up the bulk of the<br />

book, “brainwashing” is less hypnosis<br />

and Pavlovian conditioning than interrogation<br />

and torture techniques that induce<br />

POW’s to “confess” to things they<br />

haven’t done. The Communist soldiers<br />

starve prisoners, prevent them from<br />

sleeping, hang them by their thumbs<br />

from the ceiling, make them sit in freezing<br />

buckets of water, and beat them. After<br />

wearing them down, often for months,<br />

the captors offer them food, cigarettes,<br />

or medical care, if they will only confess<br />

to something. Hunter implies that this is<br />

why several soldiers ended up publicly<br />

denouncing the United States and staying<br />

behind in Korea. Korean War veterans<br />

were at first mocked in the media for<br />

“losing” the war, so Hunter seems to be<br />

on the defensive, trying to prove that the<br />

special communist torture in Korea was<br />

fiercer than what American soldiers experienced<br />

in World War II.<br />

Of course, it’s not only the diabolical<br />

Reds who use such tactics. Brainwashing<br />

puts one in mind of Abu Ghraib<br />

and recent cases in which suspects make<br />

false confessions. The book also foreshadows<br />

the furor over subliminal advertising<br />

that erupted when Vance Packard<br />

published The Hidden Persuaders a<br />

year later, in 1957 (See <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! #22).<br />

Like communism, mind control was a<br />

specter that haunted Cold War Americans<br />

as they came to see their world as<br />

less individualistic and more conformist—rationalized,<br />

streamlined, dominated<br />

by mega-corporations, and swayed<br />

by advertising. —Allison Xantha Miller<br />

Philadelphia Independent<br />

This quirky newspaper arrived in my<br />

mail this summer and I’ve been hooked<br />

ever since. A large, general interest<br />

paper based in the city of its name, the<br />

Independent resembles one of those late<br />

19th century newspapers you can occasionally<br />

find at flea markets, in both<br />

writing and design. It reminds me of my<br />

favorite local publications, the now-defunct<br />

Three Weeks, from Queens. (In<br />

fact, Three Weeks’ Henry W. Brownejohns<br />

is a frequent contributor.) Though<br />

the Independent caters to the people of<br />

Philadelphia, much of its coverage—on<br />

drug clinical trials or the war in Iraq,<br />

for instance—would appeal equally to a<br />

broader audience.<br />

As a publisher myself, I’m as impressed<br />

by the Independent’s business<br />

savvy as I am by the high quality of<br />

writing. The newspaper is staffed by a<br />

meager, underpaid staff; contributors<br />

are almost all volunteer. Yet this puppy<br />

runs like a well-oiled machine—or, at<br />

least, appears to—with a regularly updated<br />

and cleanly designed website<br />

(philadelphiaindependent.net), on-time<br />

production schedule, and a top-notch<br />

media kit. Everything these guys produce<br />

maintains the consistent, old-timey feel.<br />

In a few years, some major media<br />

cartel will no doubt buy them out, so<br />

send them <strong>your</strong> $5 for a subscription<br />

now, before it gets lame: Philadelphia<br />

Independent, 1026 Arch Street, Philadelphia,<br />

PA 19107. —Carrie McLaren<br />

Ghost, Hypnotic Underworld<br />

(Drag City); and live at the Knitting<br />

Factory, 9/21/04<br />

Ghost is a Japanese psychedelic rock<br />

band that has been around since 1986<br />

but didn’t begin to make a name in the<br />

States until about the mid-’90s. They<br />

are said to rehearse at Buddhist temples<br />

and ancient ruins around Japan, but<br />

whatever mystical explorations they<br />

make can’t hide the plain fact that they<br />

fucking rock.<br />

On their latest record, Hypnotic<br />

Underworld, they weave a little Zep<br />

bombast into trippy jams; quieter tunes<br />

<strong>take</strong> on the trappings of both Eastern<br />

(Zen) and Western (Syd Barrett) mystical<br />

traditions. A mellow folky bass riff<br />

underlies the sound of electronic water<br />

drops, as bandleader Masaki Batoh intones<br />

hypnotic Japanese. A song suite<br />

begins with 13 minutes of meandering<br />

STAY FREE! 62 ISSUE NO. 23


electronic noise, shifts to a seven-minute<br />

mind-altering crescendo, bursts the<br />

chrysalis for a two-minute Tolkien pop<br />

ride, and closes with 30 seconds of<br />

sprinting drums.<br />

Live, they lose the dynamics and<br />

textures somewhat, but hammer one<br />

tune after another into glorious psychedelic<br />

anthems. Batoh is as skinny as a<br />

stick-figure anime wizard, but he has a<br />

massive presence and a solid array of<br />

rock gestures. The rest of the band looks<br />

like Japanese rockers as drawn by Daniel<br />

Clowes, not least the neurasthenic<br />

version of Ray Manzarek on keyboards.<br />

—Jay Huber<br />

Shannon Burke, Safelight<br />

(Random House)<br />

My friend Shannon Burke—an omnivorous<br />

polymath who observes and listens<br />

closely—was a paramedic in Harlem for<br />

five years. After years of toil, his first<br />

novel is finally available, and it’s great.<br />

The protagonist, Frank, drifts<br />

through New York City in 1990 working<br />

as a paramedic in Harlem, taking<br />

candid photographs of the sick, dying<br />

and dead. We meet Frank, just as he’s<br />

launched himself on an arc of self-destruction,<br />

and Burke produces an engaging<br />

array of lowlifes, luckless, corpses<br />

and loved ones (in the late-20th-century<br />

dysfunctional way) for Frank to pinball<br />

through. It’s easy to forget New York<br />

in the years before low crime rates and<br />

bourgeois propriety, but Burke vividly<br />

captures the chaos and decay, the filth of<br />

Travis Bickle’s disgust leaching into yet<br />

another decade. This is a lean tale told<br />

in sharp dialogue and quick strokes.<br />

The precision of Burke’s eye and prose<br />

shears away sentimentality and carries<br />

the story swiftly along. —Jay Huber<br />

Running Level 3, Mini Crew<br />

.<br />

Thorlos socks<br />

Since I view footwear as an unforgivably<br />

baroque social imposition, to be resented<br />

along with credit ratings and marriage,<br />

the discovery of breathable comfort<br />

socks came as, well, a breath of fresh<br />

air. With the exception of one barefoot<br />

summer in Cambridge, Mass.—where<br />

the sidewalks are paved with brick—I’ve<br />

never felt this good about my feet. Running<br />

in Thorlos, as I plan to do in the<br />

Detroit Marathon, feels like walking.<br />

Walking in them feels like walking on a<br />

path strewn an inch deep with rose petals.<br />

Seriously.<br />

Thorlos were, like me, invented in<br />

1978; unlike me, they represent the culmination<br />

of a great deal of scientific research.<br />

Thorlos are the cyborg of socks.<br />

Though made almost entirely of a synthetic<br />

material called THOR•LON,<br />

they appear to have been pieced together<br />

from several different sources.<br />

The top is pantyhose sheer, as though<br />

there were no sock there at all. The heel<br />

and toe are padded with a thick knit.<br />

The toe-knuckles are protected with a<br />

smooth weave. The arch, the ankle—all<br />

different.<br />

The radical attention to ergonomics,<br />

as well as the obscure diacritic that<br />

appears above the first “o” in the brand<br />

name, vaguely suggest that Thorlos<br />

originate somewhere in Scandinavia, but<br />

they were, in fact, invented and manufactured<br />

in the good old U.S. of A. by<br />

people with names like Jim and Steve.<br />

At least one of these people (as related at<br />

www.thorlo.com) took the time to isolate<br />

the “7 Elements of Comfort”: moisture,<br />

stimulus, circulation, temperature,<br />

posture, shear, and pressure. Attune<br />

each element to the requirements of a<br />

specific sport—hiking, tennis, you name<br />

it—and, voilà, a sports sock is born. Just<br />

don’t tell the salespeople at the running<br />

store that you only plan to wear the<br />

socks around the house. —Matt Daniels<br />

CHUCK E. CHEESE<br />

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 45<br />

But Chuck merged with its prime competitor,<br />

ShowBiz Pizza, in the 1980s and<br />

helped drive competitors like Discovery<br />

Zone out of business. When you’re the<br />

most fun pizzeria available, there’s simply<br />

no need to be the most fun pizzeria<br />

imaginable. g<br />

STAY FREE! 63 ISSUE NO. 23


<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>!<br />

for the holidays<br />

By mid-November, <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! will be taking orders<br />

for our annual holiday gifts. For $25, you can give<br />

<strong>your</strong> friend or loved one a subscription to <strong>Stay</strong><br />

<strong>Free</strong>!, our mixed CD of weird and wonderful Xmas<br />

music, and a personalized card. We'll also have<br />

t-shirts and other goods available soon, so watch<br />

www.stayfreemagazine.org for details.<br />

Image from Roger la Borde wrapping paper<br />

STAY FREE! 64 ISSUE NO. 23


Fake Classifieds<br />

EVIL GENIUS demands obedience of<br />

world’s leaders or will unleash death<br />

laser. Death laser went over budget,<br />

must use classifieds rather than hacking<br />

TV signals. Serious, though.<br />

OTHER STONED GUY needed to<br />

watch Mexican version of Sesame<br />

Street, laugh ass off. 226-9032.<br />

SHITTY IMPROV TROUPE FORMING!<br />

Please come prepared with too much<br />

energy, Schwarzenegger impression.<br />

CALL #5569<br />

ARTIST NEEDS NUDE MODELS.<br />

Top dollar, gateway to modeling career.<br />

Am lying. Will strangle with bungee<br />

cord.<br />

FOUND. 3x3" wax paper square, poss.<br />

wrapping for confection. One of collection.<br />

Also, 1/3 crueller, good shape.<br />

BULLY wants <strong>your</strong> lunch money, or<br />

will kick ass. Now. Leave in P.O. box<br />

26413, Bklyn<br />

ROBOT, ALIEN, wants to know what<br />

this thing called “love” is. Also, laughter.<br />

CALL#1099<br />

NEED A BLOW<br />

dryer. Prefer portable 1200-watt with<br />

adjustable settings, expandable combs<br />

and heads. 332-1919.<br />

LOST DOG 4 yo beagle-great dane<br />

mix, answers to Bucky. Want him<br />

back! Chet 718/555-8877. Park Slope.<br />

RECENTLY LIBERATED DOG<br />

beagle/dane mix, Bucky, wants everyone<br />

to keep Chet away from me.<br />

MEN seeking MEN<br />

MEN SEEKING MEN<br />

Narcissist seeks self. No drugs.<br />

CALL#1099<br />

PEOPLE PEOPLE who WHO need PEOPLE NEED PEOPLE<br />

Are the luckiest people in the world.<br />

CALL#6502<br />

INANIMATE INANIMATE<br />

Thick, lush shag carpet seeks cannistertype<br />

vacuum. You know what I want.<br />

Kirbys a plus.<br />

PET seeking PET SEEKING OWNER OWNER<br />

Friendly, fit, brown spaniel seeks active,<br />

attentive owner/s. Young preferred. Am<br />

willing to fetch, shake. Full companionship,<br />

benefits. Please, no Jews.<br />

Jason Torchinsky and Tim Harrod<br />

BROCCOLI<br />

312-7490<br />

2 BR APT, landfill adj, 1 bath, kitchen,<br />

bdrooms, all in same room, 275 sq ft,<br />

tire incinerator conv., $2000<br />

I STUFF ENVELOPES! My envelopestuffing<br />

skills are nonpareil. Seek<br />

position at top of industry, minimum<br />

$2,000, $3,000, up to $4,000 a week.<br />

BEADED SEATCOVERS for the<br />

subway, armchair, bike. Why should<br />

cabbies have all the fun?<br />

LOSE WEIGHT FAST! Not fast as in<br />

rapid, fast as in don’t eat. Brochure<br />

tells how. $5<br />

STOP SMOKING.<br />

Or don’t. See if I care, $15<br />

BASSIST WANTED, into Shins, Wht<br />

Stripes, Pixies, Beck to pretend to be in<br />

band with me, tell girls I’m cool.<br />

MISSED MISSED CONNECTIONS CONNECTIONS<br />

YOU: Playing Frisbee in Prospect Park<br />

Saturday, 10/9/04, Pink shorts & green<br />

top. ME: Walking my golden retriever,<br />

iPod & gray jogging suit. You had a<br />

weird, squinty sort of look and kind of<br />

a big ass. Not interested.<br />

MEN SEEKING WOMEN<br />

Are you the one? This clever, witty<br />

DWM, early 30s, MFA, PhD, wealthy,<br />

urbane, literate, loves Camus, Kafka,<br />

Coffee, Calisthenics, Camille (Paglia),<br />

Calder, climbing and Klimt; seeks<br />

smart, attractive, intelligent WF (race/<br />

religion unimportant) to vigorously<br />

rub my genitalia. CALL#6502<br />

WOMEN WOMEN seeking SEEKING MEN MEN<br />

Attractive, SBF Columbia student,<br />

nice body, funny, seeks older WM<br />

prof. to stop bothering me. You know<br />

who you are.<br />

M Cat seeks earthy F owner. Must<br />

have tuna, many insects.<br />

ADVERTISEMENT<br />

STAY FREE! 65 ISSUE NO. 23


One of these days we’ll get around to compiling a list of stores across the U.S. that sell <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! But for now, here’s info on<br />

Where to find us in Brooklyn<br />

BOERUM HILL<br />

Bachhus<br />

Brawta<br />

Flying Saucer Café<br />

Stir It Up<br />

CARROLL GARDENS<br />

Main St. Ephemera<br />

Union Max<br />

COBBLE HILL<br />

HomeCourt<br />

Micromuseum<br />

Shakespeare’s Sister<br />

Salonike<br />

Smith & Vine<br />

Videomania<br />

PARK SLOPE<br />

7th Ave. Kids Books<br />

7th Ave. Books<br />

Bierkraft<br />

Beacon’s Closet<br />

Brooklyn Industries<br />

Bklyn Superhero Supply<br />

Community Bookstore<br />

409 Atlantic Ave.<br />

347 Atlantic Ave.<br />

494 Atlantic Ave.<br />

514 Atlantic Ave.<br />

205 Columbia St.<br />

110 Union St.<br />

286 Court St.<br />

123 Smith St.<br />

270 Court St.<br />

155 Smith St.<br />

246 Smith St.<br />

170 Smith St.<br />

202 7th Ave.<br />

300 7th Ave.<br />

191 5th Ave.<br />

220 5th Ave.<br />

206 5th Ave.<br />

372 5th Ave.<br />

143 7th Ave.<br />

Cousin John’s Bakery<br />

Eidolon<br />

Girasol<br />

Great Lakes<br />

La Taqueria<br />

Lucia<br />

Ozzie’s<br />

Scaredy Kat<br />

Slang Betty<br />

Southpaw<br />

Tea Lounge<br />

Yakatori Canteen<br />

PROSPECT HEIGHTS<br />

Café Shane<br />

Gen<br />

Half Wine Bar<br />

Hibiscus<br />

Housebroken<br />

Prospect Perk Café<br />

Ripple<br />

Sepia<br />

70 7th Ave.<br />

233 5th Ave.<br />

69 7th Ave.<br />

284 5th Ave.<br />

72 7th Ave.<br />

272 5th Ave.<br />

57 7th Ave., 249 5th Ave.<br />

229 5th Ave.<br />

172 5th Ave.<br />

125 5th Ave.<br />

837 Union St., 350 7th Ave.<br />

131 6th Ave.<br />

794 Washington Ave.<br />

659 Washington Ave.<br />

626 Vanderbilt Ave.<br />

564 Vanderbilt Ave.<br />

603 Vanderbilt Ave.<br />

183 Sterling Place<br />

769 Washington Ave.<br />

234 Underhill Ave.<br />

Thanks to these local businesses for supporting<br />

independent media. Local businesses interested<br />

in carrying the magazine should contact Carrie at<br />

cm@stayfreemagazine.org or 718-398-9324. The above<br />

list is in progress as we go to press. For additional places,<br />

see www.stayfreemagazine.org.<br />

Jenny Erickson<br />

Whoops!<br />

American Gentrifier isn’t a real magazine, but we think<br />

you’ll enjoy the magazine that created it. So flip this over<br />

and start again with <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>!’s first-ever Brooklyn issue.<br />

STAY FREE! 66 ISSUE NO. 23


OUR DONORS MAKE US HAPPY<br />

Readers often ask,<br />

“Where do you get<br />

<strong>your</strong> money?” to<br />

which we respond,<br />

“What money?”<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! is published<br />

by volunteers on a<br />

shoestring budget.<br />

When we raise enough<br />

money through<br />

donations, ad sales,<br />

and subscriptions,<br />

we cover expenses.<br />

When we don't, we<br />

turn to crime. • Okay,<br />

not really. But <strong>your</strong><br />

support keeps us<br />

going despite some<br />

rather daunting odds,<br />

and, for that, we<br />

sincerely thank you.<br />

THE ILLUMINATI<br />

Brewster Kahle<br />

John Romkey<br />

Susan Kornfield<br />

THE MASONS<br />

Bart Weiss<br />

John Canning<br />

Kembrew McLeod<br />

KIWANIS CLUB<br />

Aaron Goodman<br />

Aaron P. Kruse<br />

Acacia Duncan<br />

Albert Brenner<br />

Alexander Hooke<br />

Amish Nishawala<br />

Bertrand Grimault<br />

Brian Baxter<br />

Brian Merrikin<br />

Charles Leduc<br />

Cheryl Furjanic<br />

Christopher Conte<br />

Christopher Harrington<br />

Christopher Nolan<br />

Dan Macias<br />

David Brinker<br />

David Flanagan<br />

Douglas Inglish<br />

Evonne Hyla Wetzner<br />

Frederic Kahler<br />

Gretchen Skogerson<br />

Hanno Bennert<br />

Jaimes Valdez<br />

James Byrnes<br />

Jason Dowd<br />

Jason Persse<br />

Jeff Wishnie<br />

Joe Estes<br />

John Mcgrath<br />

John Redpath<br />

Jonathan Williams<br />

Joshua Zyber<br />

Julie S. Dorcey<br />

K. B. Fisher<br />

Kimberly Mims<br />

Laura Teodosio<br />

Lawrence Baca<br />

Lee Anne Schmitt<br />

Marc Perlman<br />

Mark Gondree<br />

Matt Fee<br />

Matthew Fantaci<br />

Michael Mcdermott<br />

Michael Terry<br />

Neil Duncan<br />

Ntennis Davi<br />

Pat Johnson<br />

Robert Newton<br />

Robert Ovetz<br />

Roy Batchelor<br />

Sarah Schenck<br />

Shannon Lamb<br />

Stewart Foster<br />

Stewart Foster<br />

Susan Brown<br />

Vikki Dempsey<br />

Wayne Richard Hayes<br />

William Stotler<br />

<strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>! is a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization. Donations are tax deductible and can be made online at<br />

stayfreemagazine.org or via mail to <strong>Stay</strong> <strong>Free</strong>!, 390 Butler Street, Third Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11217. Donations<br />

of $30 or more will be acknowledged in the magazine (albeit in small type); these donors will also receive<br />

a our Illegal Art Exhibit DVD-R (including copyright-infringing videos by Eugene Mirman, Todd Haynes, and<br />

more). The Illuminati includes donors of $300 or more; the Masons, $50–$299; Kiwanis Club, $30–$49.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!