chapter 2 - Stiftung "Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft"
chapter 2 - Stiftung "Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft"
chapter 2 - Stiftung "Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft"
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Otto Böhm<br />
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AS<br />
A HUMAN RIGHT:<br />
THE ROLE OF HATE SPEECH IN<br />
THE PUBLIC SPHERE<br />
Prohibitions against discrimination are one of the centerpieces of human rights. Indeed, our contemporary international<br />
human rights framework owes much to the struggle against racial discrimination across the globe.<br />
However, as Heiner Bielefeldt has noted, “Anti-racism was not intrinsic to the human rights agenda from the<br />
start, at least not explicitly.” 1 On closer examination, human rights progress in the area of anti-discrimination<br />
has often been uneven and contradictory, shaped by the interaction between universal norms and concrete<br />
historical developments. Within this context, a central dilemma has been the ongoing tension between freedom<br />
of expression and the limits placed on this freedom in the name of combating racial incitement. Most<br />
countries view racism and hate speech as morally reprehensible, and they are as such subject to legal sanctions<br />
in many nations. In Germany, for example, racial discrimination has become less overt and openly racist<br />
remarks are rarely heard in public speech as a result. However, the ongoing effort to eliminate hate speech in<br />
the public sphere continues to impose limits on the freedom of expression, a key human right that is traditionally<br />
construed as unlimited in scope. The recent trend for individuals and groups to invoke freedom of expression<br />
in the defense of their right to disseminate racist propaganda further complicates this picture.<br />
Prohibitions on discrimination are rooted in the protection of human rights and dignity for all. From the human<br />
rights perspective, freedom of expression and the avoidance of discrimination and racism are not inherently<br />
contradictory concepts. In fact, robust anti-discrimination policies support and protect individual<br />
freedom, while racist ideologies <strong>und</strong>ermine freedom, subjugating individual freedom to the needs of the collective.<br />
Indeed, as the German Institute for Human Rights has argued, “all human rights – whether freedom of<br />
religion, freedom of expression, the basic rights to justice, the right to an education or the right to participation<br />
in the labor market – are always gro<strong>und</strong>ed in the ideal of human equality and anti-discrimination.” 2<br />
In what follows, I will elucidate various points of tension between freedom of speech and anti-discrimination.<br />
Anja Zimmer’s Hate Speech im Völkerrecht describes the debates surro<strong>und</strong>ing hate speech and racist acts as<br />
1 Heiner Bielefeldt, “Rassismusbekämpfung im Streit der internationalen Menschenrechtspolitik,” in Policy Paper No. 13 of the Deutschen Instituts für<br />
Menschenrechte (2009): 4, accessed Nov. 25, 1009 from http://files.institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de/488/d89_v1_file_49c23ff23902d_PP_Rassismus<br />
bekaempfung_Maerz_2009.pdf.<br />
2 Petra Follmar-Otto and Hendrik Cremer, “Der Nationale Aktionsplan der B<strong>und</strong>esrepublik Deutschland gegen Rassismus - Stellungnahme <strong>und</strong> Empfehlungen,”<br />
Policy Paper No. 12 of the Deutschen Instituts für Menschenrechte (2009): 5, accessed on Nov. 25, 2009 from http://www.institut-fuermenschenrechte.de/uploads/tx_commerce/policy_paper_12_der_nationale_aktionsplan_der_b<strong>und</strong>esrepublik_deutschland_gegen_rassismus.pdf.<br />
90<br />
<strong>Stiftung</strong> EVZ<br />
HUMAN RIGHTS AND HISTORY: A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION