Volume 3 No 4 - Air Power Studies
Volume 3 No 4 - Air Power Studies
Volume 3 No 4 - Air Power Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PRODUCTION BALANCE<br />
The simple answer is that losses were never greater<br />
than production. Deliveries to the operational<br />
squadrons actually exceeded wastage throughout<br />
the Battle (Figure 10). This disguises, however, the<br />
crucial role played by the CRO. 49 While the<br />
sustained efforts of the aircraft industry were vital to<br />
maintaining the frontline, repair provided 40% of the<br />
total output received by the operational squadrons,<br />
Figure 11 : Hurricane & Spitfire Production vs<br />
Repair July - December 1940<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
Figure 10 : Fighter Command - <strong>Air</strong>craft Issued<br />
July - December 1940<br />
Total Wastage<br />
Fighters Issued<br />
Jul-40 Aug-40 Sep-40 Oct-40 <strong>No</strong>v-40 Dec-40<br />
31<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Production<br />
Deliveries<br />
CRO Repair<br />
Output<br />
Jul-40 Aug-40 Sep-40 Oct-40 <strong>No</strong>v-40 Dec-40<br />
as Figure 11 illustrates. At the height of the Battle, the<br />
CRO was achieving repair turn round times of under 6<br />
weeks for Hurricanes and Spitfires, employing a<br />
combination of depot, fly-in and on-site repair. The<br />
Luftwaffe had no capability on this scale. In fact, until as<br />
late as 1942, repair output was no more than 25% of<br />
production. 50 Germany had entered the war with<br />
reserves of 900 aircraft, equivalent to 25% of front line<br />
strength, compared to reserves of 2,200 aircraft, some<br />
115% of front line strength, held by the Royal <strong>Air</strong> Force.