06.09.2014 Views

Download the November/December 1996 Issue in PDF format

Download the November/December 1996 Issue in PDF format

Download the November/December 1996 Issue in PDF format

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

useless unless <strong>the</strong>re is an edge chamfer. Edge<br />

chamfer dimensions do not have <strong>the</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>ts of<br />

tip chamfers., s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y are mad.e after <strong>the</strong> gear<br />

teeth are cut. Their dimensions are to some extent<br />

<strong>in</strong>depend m of gear tooth tolerance . Chamfer<br />

size range from 0.012" (0.3 mm) to 0.030" (0.8)<br />

rnm. The angles need to be set so that <strong>the</strong> expo ed<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts are as far .away from '!he ends of <strong>the</strong> tooth<br />

as po sible (see Fig. 5). A <strong>the</strong> heliix angle <strong>in</strong>creases,<br />

<strong>the</strong> chamfer angle (related to <strong>the</strong> 'tooth axis),<br />

decreases to less taan 20°. For example, a 30°<br />

helix angle will lead loa [SO charmer angle ..There<br />

i orne reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> chamfer ire while shav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Fig.. 6), Dur<strong>in</strong>g thi process, 0.00[5" (OlM<br />

mm) of stock is removed from. each flank. If <strong>the</strong><br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>al chamfeJ' size was 0..012" (03 mm), <strong>the</strong><br />

chamfer size after shav<strong>in</strong>g would be<br />

Po<strong>in</strong>t of 1';0 lble Presence of BUITIl<br />

Fig, '1 - Coned chamfer<strong>in</strong>g procedl!ft.<br />

(o.04)s<strong>in</strong>45°<br />

0...= 01,3 - . 150 = 0.19:mm or O.(~)75"<br />

~D . •<br />

Therefore. i.t is neces ary ,to stan with a Warger<br />

size chamfer, maybe 0.024-0.1030" (o.'.'(j....{).811l1D). 1 I<br />

The cbamfer should be made without fmis'b<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with a tep, Sometimes it is better to chamfer<br />

<strong>the</strong> root fiUe! even if thrs area is Datu ceptible<br />

to nick<strong>in</strong>g .. fig. 7 shows <strong>the</strong> correct procedure<br />

for chamfer<strong>in</strong>g ..<br />

Production Methods<br />

Edge chamfers can be produced by three different<br />

methods,<br />

A. cutt<strong>in</strong>g ope.r.alion. There are two cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods. The mach<strong>in</strong>e may 'be designed to have a<br />

mill<strong>in</strong>g cutter and a gear tra<strong>in</strong> of CNC equipment<br />

to generate an <strong>in</strong>volute. The mill<strong>in</strong>g cutter can be<br />

heM steady with only one circular peed along its<br />

axi . In Ibis case, <strong>the</strong> chamfer is uniform and parallel<br />

to '!he !<strong>in</strong>volute. This method producesagood<br />

chamfer, and <strong>the</strong>re is no Deed Ior any additional<br />

deburr<strong>in</strong>g operations. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r ~and, mill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is a costly operation, and it is difficult 10 chamfer<br />

gears ly<strong>in</strong>g adjacent to a. shoulder u <strong>in</strong>g this technique.<br />

Cycl.e times are long <strong>in</strong> tbits method<br />

because of <strong>in</strong>dex<strong>in</strong>g, and too] life is poor.<br />

A second way to cut a chamfer is to use a gear<br />

tra<strong>in</strong> or CNC equipment to <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>in</strong> conjunction<br />

with a cutter. The cutter has a reciprocat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

motion timed with <strong>the</strong> iadex<strong>in</strong>g motion. This type<br />

of operation u ually produces <strong>the</strong> chamfer along a<br />

traight lille. The advantage of this me!hod! is !hat<br />

no fur<strong>the</strong>r d.eburr<strong>in</strong>g operation is required. Among<br />

<strong>the</strong> disadvantages is <strong>the</strong> fact that this method creates<br />

an uneven chamfer ,extend<strong>in</strong>g ,through <strong>the</strong><br />

whole root. Sometime burrs are [eft on <strong>the</strong> gear <strong>in</strong><br />

Ule root area. Chamfer<strong>in</strong>g gears adjacent to a<br />

shoulder is also difficult with this method. Aga<strong>in</strong>,<br />

cycle times are long. and tool life is poor. This<br />

Fig. 8 - A cross section of gear and ehamrcrl~1l tooll:eetb. lnBI mUiDg opcmlloD.<br />

approach also requires a lot of eperator assistance<br />

to. ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a good setup.<br />

A gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g operation. Ell this method, a gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

wheel is used to produce <strong>the</strong> ctlamfers; The<br />

advantages are low cycle timesand acceptable<br />

chamfers all aro1!md, but <strong>the</strong> gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g powder<br />

mixed with steel particles poHutestbe atmosphere.<br />

creat<strong>in</strong>g Clean Air Act compliance preb-<br />

Iemsand rais<strong>in</strong>g 'concerns about employee health<br />

and general environmental ethics. To eeunter <strong>the</strong><br />

pollution. effecss, expensive fIlters and dust collectors<br />

are needed. T<strong>in</strong>y bUJ'fS are created along <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>volute, amd <strong>the</strong>y need an extra Clean<strong>in</strong>g operation<br />

like shot peen blast. A lot of operator assistance<br />

is required to ma<strong>in</strong>la<strong>in</strong> a good setup,<br />

A roll<strong>in</strong>g opermion ,us<strong>in</strong>g special c.laarnfer<br />

tool&. This operation <strong>in</strong>volves driv<strong>in</strong>g a chamfer<br />

tool <strong>in</strong> mesh with <strong>the</strong> gear under pressure. The<br />

pI1essure wtllplasticaHy deform <strong>the</strong> material, produc<strong>in</strong>gtbe<br />

chamfer. Most of <strong>the</strong> material<br />

deformed plastically will flow out of <strong>the</strong> ides A,<br />

8, Camd D (see Fig. 8). Troy portion > about<br />

OJ}OO8" (O.02.mm), will rise up t<strong>in</strong>y ridges<br />

<strong>in</strong>side <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>volutes E. F. G and H. and a very<br />

small portion will rise out of <strong>the</strong> tip chamfer (D)<br />

(Fi.g.I) produced bya turn<strong>in</strong>g operation. Because<br />

of this, <strong>the</strong> operation must be followed bya f<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

operation like shav<strong>in</strong>g or gr<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g ..II is not<br />

recommended for f<strong>in</strong>ished 'cut parts.<br />

NOY,EIIIIIEFl/DECE!!!lEII<br />

II

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!