07.09.2014 Views

P - bei Swiss-Cave-Diving

P - bei Swiss-Cave-Diving

P - bei Swiss-Cave-Diving

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Physiology Workshop<br />

Respiratory Issues in Technical <strong>Diving</strong><br />

The phenomenon illustrated in Figure 13 is “effort-independent exhalation,” named<br />

so because once it occurs, no amount of extra expiratory effort will increase the flow of<br />

gas out of the balloon. This is because any extra pressure created inside the bag is<br />

applied to both the balloon and to the distensible tube leading out of it, thus there is<br />

no net gain. Effort independent exhalation occurs in “real-life.” In fact, it is seen<br />

during a forced exhalation in normal subjects breathing air at 1 ata. But in this setting<br />

it occurs at such high flow rates that it doesn’t really matter. The exercising person can<br />

still shift huge volumes of gas in and out of the lungs despite the presence of effort<br />

independent exhalation.<br />

The problem in diving is that effort-independent exhalation will occur at much lower<br />

flow rates when a denser gas is breathed because the pressure drop along a tube is<br />

much greater. Thus, Wood and Bryan demonstrated that effort independent<br />

exhalation was almost encountered during normal tidal breathing when breathing air<br />

at 10 ata (10). Put in more practical terms, if divers breathing air at 10 ata tried to do<br />

much more than normal quiet breathing, they would have difficulty increasing their<br />

ventilation no matter how hard they tried. While air at 10 ata seems farfetched, it is<br />

not difficult to imagine gas mixes of equivalent density <strong>bei</strong>ng used at extreme depth<br />

given the rate at which technical diving is progressing. Indeed, as previously<br />

mentioned, David Shaw’s trimix on his 264 mfw dive had an equivalent density to air<br />

at 8 ata (9).<br />

Perhaps most frightening of all, the phenomenon of effort-independent exhalation sets<br />

up the scenario described as a major contributor to David Shaw’s death (9). Thus, a<br />

diver undertakes exercise during a very deep dive, breathing gas at high density.<br />

Various factors (see below) cause an initial rise in arterial CO 2<br />

and the diver starts to<br />

feel breathless because of the consequently increased drive to breathe. Instead of<br />

stopping and resting, the diver tries to work through the problem. If this sounds<br />

implausible, think about the last time you made a descent to a deep wreck into a<br />

current! The attempts to increase ventilation intensify, and this is where the problems<br />

really start. Increased arterial CO 2<br />

is driving the diver to breathe harder, but<br />

exhalation (and therefore ventilation) becomes effort independent and the extra effort<br />

fails to produce the increase in ventilation required to lower the arterial CO 2<br />

. In fact,<br />

the extra effort is just wasted work and only serves to produce more CO 2<br />

. The diver<br />

enters a vicious spiral in which increasing CO 2<br />

drives greater respiratory effort, which<br />

just produces more CO 2<br />

. This will ultimately result in respiratory muscle exhaustion,<br />

rapidly rising CO 2<br />

, and CO 2<br />

narcosis leading to unconsciousness. This scenario was<br />

predicted by Wood and Bryan in 1969 (10), and may well have been demonstrated in<br />

a practical sense by both the Shaw accident and other accidents caused by<br />

hypercapnia.<br />

Technical <strong>Diving</strong> Conference Proceedings 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!