10.09.2014 Views

Haig Park draft master plan - Territory and Municipal Services - ACT ...

Haig Park draft master plan - Territory and Municipal Services - ACT ...

Haig Park draft master plan - Territory and Municipal Services - ACT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DRAFT<br />

HAIG PARK<br />

MASTER PLAN REPORT<br />

MAY 2012


DRAFT<br />

Prepared by<br />

Enviro Links Design (2011)<br />

In conjuncon with<br />

Eric Marn & Associates<br />

For<br />

<strong>ACT</strong> Shared <strong>Services</strong> Procurement<br />

On behalf of<br />

<strong>Park</strong>s & City <strong>Services</strong><br />

<strong>Territory</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Directorate<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 2


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1 Execuve summary 5<br />

2 Introducon 7<br />

2.1 Historical background <strong>and</strong> significance of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 7<br />

2.2 Heritage significance 9<br />

3 The study area 9<br />

3.1 Site descripon 9<br />

3.2 L<strong>and</strong>scape character 11<br />

3.3 Role <strong>and</strong> current uses 11<br />

3.4 Opportunies <strong>and</strong> constraints 13<br />

4 Legislave framework <strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ning controls 13<br />

4.1 Legislaon, policies <strong>and</strong> strategies 13<br />

4.2 <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> specific <strong>plan</strong>ning <strong>and</strong> development controls 13<br />

5 Consultaon with stakeholders 17<br />

5.1 <strong>ACT</strong> Government stakeholder consultaon <strong>and</strong> public consultaon 17<br />

6 The Master Plan—future direcons <strong>and</strong> proposals 17<br />

6.1 Trees <strong>and</strong> other vegetaon 19<br />

6.2 Access <strong>and</strong> circulaon 23<br />

6.3 Spaces <strong>and</strong> funcons 25<br />

6.4 Facilies <strong>and</strong> amenies 29<br />

6.5 Interpretave signage <strong>and</strong> informaon 31<br />

6.6 Artworks, feature lighng <strong>and</strong> commemorave elements 31<br />

6.7 Safety <strong>and</strong> security 31<br />

6.8 Design, materials <strong>and</strong> finishes 33<br />

DRAFT<br />

7 Implementaon 35<br />

8 Monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluaon 35<br />

8.1 Tree management 35<br />

8.2 Traffic management 35<br />

8.3 Master Plan review 35<br />

Appendices 39<br />

Appendix A: Tree Management 40<br />

Appendix B: Traffic Management 44<br />

References 49<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 3


List of Figures<br />

Figure 1: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Local Context<br />

Figure 2: Opportunies & Constraints<br />

Figure 3: Original Planng Row Setout<br />

Figure 4: Exisng Vegetaon<br />

Figure 5: Exisng Pedestrian Access & Circulaon<br />

Figure 6: Exisng Vehicle Access & Circulaon<br />

Figure 7: Exisng Spaces & Funcons<br />

Figure 8: Exisng Facilies & Amenies<br />

Figure 9a: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> West Master Plan<br />

Figure 9b: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> East Master Plan<br />

Figure 10: Central Acvity Node (Depot Removed)<br />

Unless otherwise stated all figures have been prepared <strong>and</strong> photo’s taken by Enviro Links Design Pty Ltd.<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 4


1 Execuve summary<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the third largest of the eleven Inner Canberra<br />

District <strong>Park</strong>s. Located just north of the city centre <strong>and</strong><br />

either side of Northbourne Avenue, it is one of the most<br />

prominent <strong>and</strong> significant l<strong>and</strong>scape spaces in Canberra.<br />

Listed on the <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Register (Entry No. 20063)<br />

both for its significance as a l<strong>and</strong>scape feature <strong>and</strong> for its<br />

mass tree <strong>plan</strong>ngs of nine species, the park requires a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard of management appropriate with this high profile<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />

This Master Plan, which comprises Figure 9 (the Master<br />

Plan) <strong>and</strong> this report, is intended to provide <strong>plan</strong>ning<br />

<strong>and</strong> conceptual design guidelines to protect the unique<br />

character of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, enhance recreaonal opportunies<br />

<strong>and</strong> enhance the overall presentaon of the park.<br />

The exisng condions, park usage, facilies, conservaon<br />

policies, legislave <strong>and</strong> management frameworks have<br />

been assessed, opportunies <strong>and</strong> constraints have been<br />

idenfied, <strong>and</strong> community input received. Each of these<br />

has informed the recommendaons.<br />

These elements of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> have been assessed <strong>and</strong><br />

recommendaons made for each:<br />

• vegetaon<br />

• access <strong>and</strong> circulaon<br />

• spaces <strong>and</strong> funcons<br />

• facilies <strong>and</strong> amenies<br />

• interpretave signage <strong>and</strong> informaon<br />

• artworks <strong>and</strong> commemorave features<br />

• safety <strong>and</strong> security<br />

• design, materials <strong>and</strong> finishes.<br />

The intent is to retain <strong>and</strong> reinforce the l<strong>and</strong>scape character<br />

that defines <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> to protect the heritage values of the<br />

park. Where opportunity exists, it has been recommended<br />

that facilies, paths <strong>and</strong> spaces be upgraded to further<br />

enhance park experience <strong>and</strong> ensure that <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

connues to present as a high quality l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />

The primary recommendaons are:<br />

• Reinforcement of tree <strong>plan</strong>ngs throughout the<br />

park, to ensure the ongoing succession of park trees<br />

<strong>and</strong> the retenon of the park’s heritage (refer Secon<br />

6.1.2).<br />

• for two Heritage Integrity Zones, these are<br />

recommended for areas that sll best represent<br />

the original <strong>plan</strong>ng <strong>and</strong> layout intenon of 1921;<br />

addional <strong>plan</strong>ng to beer reflect the original<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ng is proposed (refer Secons 6.1.2).<br />

• Creaon of a Central Acvity Node <strong>and</strong> focal space<br />

using the former City <strong>Park</strong>s Depot (currently the<br />

Lead Disability <strong>Services</strong> Depot) to take advantage<br />

of the large open area. This is a large sunny area in<br />

the most intensive use area of the park adjacent to<br />

the commercial precinct. It provides an opportunity<br />

to respond to community desire for encouraging<br />

more acve uses of the park, without heritage tree<br />

removal. This acon had general community support<br />

during consultaons (refer Figure 10 <strong>and</strong> Secon<br />

6.3.2).<br />

• Upgrading of selected preferred (‘desire line’)<br />

pedestrian routes to a higher quality surface <strong>and</strong><br />

combine tracks where feasible for more stable all<br />

weather usability (refer Secon 6.2.2).<br />

• Retenon of exisng small open areas on the<br />

northern park edge that have beer solar access in<br />

what is largely a shaded park (refer Secon 6.2.2).<br />

• Upgraded park furniture <strong>and</strong> facilies for a more<br />

unified <strong>and</strong> consistent presentaon in select locaons<br />

(refer Secon 6.4.2).<br />

• Addional interpretave signage <strong>and</strong> informaon<br />

(refer Secon 6.5.1).<br />

• Installaon of artworks <strong>and</strong> commemorave<br />

features (refer Secon 6.6.2).<br />

• Addional lighng, <strong>and</strong> select vegetaon removal<br />

to improve park safety, parcularly at night (refer<br />

Secon 6.7.2).<br />

The recommendaons are driven by broad consideraons<br />

of the park’s history <strong>and</strong> importance <strong>and</strong> by community<br />

input. That is, they acknowledge the concerns, issues <strong>and</strong><br />

opportunies raised by the community <strong>and</strong> aim to address<br />

these. They aim to encourage more involvement by the<br />

community, specifically in contribung to some of the<br />

park’s direcons, <strong>and</strong> most importantly by meeng the<br />

desire for more aracve, acve community spaces.<br />

The Master Plan provides strategic direcon <strong>and</strong> the overall<br />

vision required for future works, at no me losing sight<br />

of the size <strong>and</strong> significance of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. The scope of the<br />

proposals reflect:<br />

• heritage constraints<br />

• the desire to retain much of the exisng character,<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

• realisc management <strong>and</strong> capital works outlays<br />

(improvements are dependent on available funding).<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 5


LEGEND<br />

HAIG PARK<br />

URBAN OPEN SPACE<br />

AINSLIE<br />

HAIG PARK<br />

(WEST)<br />

BRADDON<br />

COMMERCIAL<br />

DISTRICT<br />

HAIG PARK<br />

(EAST)<br />

BRADDON<br />

CORROBOREE<br />

PARK<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

O’CONNOR<br />

HACKETT<br />

GARDENS<br />

AUSTRALIAN<br />

NATIONAL<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

P<br />

TURNER<br />

PRIMARY<br />

SCHOOL<br />

S<br />

P<br />

TURNER<br />

P<br />

P<br />

ENCLOSED<br />

SPORTSGROUND<br />

ENCLOSED<br />

SPORTSGROUND<br />

S<br />

S<br />

MERICI<br />

COLLEGE<br />

LIMESTONE AVENUE<br />

GIRRAHWEEN STREET<br />

S<br />

S<br />

TORRENS STREET<br />

McCAUGHEY STREET<br />

S<br />

S<br />

AINSLIE<br />

PRIMARY<br />

SCHOOL<br />

S<br />

LONSDALE STREET<br />

MORT STREET<br />

DRAFT<br />

CITY<br />

0 100 500<br />

1000<br />

COMMERCIAL LAND USE<br />

EDUCATIONAL LAND USE<br />

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE<br />

EXISTING LOCAL HALL<br />

P PLAYGROUND<br />

S<br />

TENNIS CLUB<br />

(m)<br />

SPORTGROUND<br />

PARK BARBECUE<br />

N<br />

LAWN BOWLS CLUB<br />

BARRY DRIVE<br />

Figure 1: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Local Context<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 6


2 Introducon<br />

The <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan is set out at Figure 9, which<br />

needs to be read in conjuncon with this document, the<br />

Master Plan report.<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />

The following summarises key phases in its history, all of<br />

which influence the thinking behind the recommendaons<br />

in this report <strong>and</strong> Master Plan.<br />

Enviro Links Design, a sub-consultant to Eric Marn &<br />

Associates, was engaged by <strong>Park</strong>s & City <strong>Services</strong> (PACS),<br />

<strong>Territory</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Directorate (TAMS)<br />

to prepare the Master Plan. Eric Marn & Associates<br />

has prepared a Conservaon Management Plan (CMP)<br />

concurrent with the Master Plan. There was joint<br />

community consultaon. This approach aids an interacve<br />

<strong>and</strong> consistent response. The Master Plan recognises<br />

the park’s heritage values <strong>and</strong> recommends long term<br />

management strategies <strong>and</strong> design soluons consistent<br />

with those values.<br />

The Master Plan has been developed as a <strong>plan</strong>ning <strong>and</strong><br />

concept design document, intended to guide the quality<br />

upgrade of the park over the next five to 10 years, in<br />

keeping with the heritage significance of the park. The aim<br />

is to create a more vital, interesng, welcoming <strong>and</strong> vibrant<br />

place offering mixed opportunies for diverse users <strong>and</strong><br />

more diverse uses. It is recognised that as the residenal<br />

populaon of the inner north increases so too will the<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> for improved recreaonal opportunies.<br />

2.1 Historical background <strong>and</strong> significance<br />

of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the third largest of the 11 inner Canberra<br />

District <strong>Park</strong>s, nine of which are on or adjoin Lake Burley<br />

Griffin. <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is relavely disncve for this reason<br />

(the other non-lake related park is the Redwood Grove<br />

near the Canberra Airport). Similarly, only <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Telopea <strong>Park</strong> are primarily surrounded by residenal <strong>and</strong><br />

commercial developments.<br />

But <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s true significance <strong>and</strong> importance derives<br />

from its origins <strong>and</strong> purpose, associated with the<br />

establishment of Canberra.<br />

It is considered unique for an Australian urban park<br />

because of its linear <strong>plan</strong>ning framework. 1 The selecon,<br />

mix <strong>and</strong> layout of trees are part of the design <strong>and</strong> aesthec<br />

quality of the park. 2 The formal <strong>plan</strong>ng of exoc<br />

deciduous <strong>and</strong> conifer trees applied on such a large scale<br />

makes <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> a unique l<strong>and</strong>scape space to Canberra. In<br />

addion to this, the informality of pedestrian routes (other<br />

than the north–south link pathways) creates a curious<br />

relaonship between formality in the tree <strong>plan</strong>ng <strong>and</strong> the<br />

informal use of the park. The result is a relavely relaxing<br />

urban open space within a highly fixed formal structure.<br />

This further enhances <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s individuality.<br />

It is listed on the <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Register (Entry No. 20063)<br />

both for its significance as a l<strong>and</strong>scape feature <strong>and</strong> for its<br />

mass tree <strong>plan</strong>ngs of nine species. It requires a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

of management appropriate for such an important<br />

1 Eric Marn <strong>and</strong> Associates, 2011, <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Conservaon Management Plan,<br />

page 71<br />

2 Marn, page 71<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 1921<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> commenced its life as the East-West Shelter<br />

Break 3 with the majority of the <strong>plan</strong>ng (over 7000 trees)<br />

undertaken in 1921. 4 Its prime funcon was to protect the<br />

first suburbs north of the yet to be developed Civic Centre<br />

from wind <strong>and</strong> dust. 5 The Naonal Capital site at this me<br />

was bare <strong>and</strong> windswept—hot winds, cold winds <strong>and</strong> dust<br />

were significant problems as there was limited vegetaon<br />

(savannah woodl<strong>and</strong>) on the broad valley plains.<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> would in me also serve as a park for the nearby<br />

residents of the new city, becoming the community park<br />

of today. The <strong>plan</strong>ng was designed by Charles Weston,<br />

Canberra’s first Officer-in-charge of Afforestaon (later to<br />

become <strong>Park</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Gardens), from 1913 to 1926.<br />

Pinus radiata (Monterey Pine) was the dominant species, of<br />

which Weston <strong>plan</strong>ted nearly 2000, reflecng his desire to<br />

achieve quick results <strong>and</strong> wind / dust amelioraon. It was<br />

common for the early <strong>plan</strong>ngs in Canberra to include fast<br />

growing species such as Wales <strong>and</strong> Pinus radiata to offer<br />

some protecon to other trees <strong>and</strong> for fast effect, oen<br />

with the intenon to remove them within a few years. This<br />

was probably the reason for the inclusion of Pinus radiata<br />

in <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. 6<br />

Another tree that was heavily <strong>plan</strong>ted was Roman cypress<br />

(Cupressus sempervirens ‘Stricta’) despite its minimal<br />

windbreak contribuon. In western sociees Roman<br />

cypress has been tradionally recognised as a symbol of<br />

death <strong>and</strong> immortality. In <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, its <strong>plan</strong>ng perhaps<br />

reflected Weston’s intenons to pay tribute to the many<br />

Australians who had not returned from the World War. 7<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> was named for Earl Douglas <strong>Haig</strong>, Comm<strong>and</strong>er-inchief<br />

of the Brish Empire Forces during World War I aer<br />

his death in 1928. 8<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 1921 – 1950<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> remained a strong l<strong>and</strong>scape feature delineang<br />

the northern edge of Canberra unl the early 1950s. <strong>Park</strong><br />

management emphasised the historic nature of the park.<br />

The original design was maintained even though thinning<br />

was found necessary. Wales <strong>and</strong> flowering trees were the<br />

main species removed.<br />

During the 1940s <strong>and</strong> 1950s work undertaken consisted<br />

mainly of maintenance <strong>and</strong> the removal of some <strong>plan</strong>ngs.<br />

Significant pruning was undertaken in 1946. John Gray<br />

believes that the Wales were probably removed in the<br />

3 J. Gray (1997) The Historical <strong>and</strong> Cultural Background of Selected Urban <strong>Park</strong>s<br />

in Canberra<br />

4 Eric Marn <strong>and</strong> Associates, 2011, <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Conservaon Management Plan,<br />

page 16<br />

5 R. Boden et al. 2000, ‘<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Tree Management Plan’, page 1<br />

6 Ibid<br />

7 Gray (1997)<br />

8 Gray (1997)<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 7


Image 1: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> as viewed from Mount Ainslie<br />

1927 (Source: Naonal Archives of Australia)<br />

DRAFT<br />

Image 2: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> looking northwards viewed<br />

from above Commonwealth <strong>Park</strong> During the<br />

1950’s. (Source: Naonal Archives of Australia)<br />

Image 3: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> viewed southwards from<br />

above Northbourne Avenue during the 1960’s.<br />

(Source: Naonal Archives of Australia)<br />

Note: No other <strong>plan</strong>ng had the size or<br />

impact of those in <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> on the North<br />

Canberra plains unl at least the late<br />

1960’s.<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 8


late 1940s by Professor Lindsay Pryor, then Director of <strong>Park</strong>s<br />

<strong>and</strong> Gardens. 9<br />

The exisng buildings were all built between 1948 <strong>and</strong> 1958, 10<br />

other than the new toilet block, thought to be built in the late<br />

1980s.<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> in the 1970s<br />

In the early 1970s public concern about the management of<br />

the park led the Naonal Capital Development Commission<br />

to restrict vehicular access <strong>and</strong> construct car parks, a fitness<br />

track <strong>and</strong> picnic areas, <strong>and</strong> add irrigaon in some areas of the<br />

park. 11<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 1980s onwards<br />

In 1987, Margules & Associates prepared a Preliminary<br />

Concept Proposals (Master Plan) for <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. Their key<br />

tree management recommendaons are summarised in the<br />

Tree Management Table (refer Appendix A, also Secon 8.1).<br />

Of primary importance was the Pinus radiata removal <strong>and</strong><br />

re<strong>plan</strong>ng, which had started in 1984 <strong>and</strong> connued in 1991<br />

<strong>and</strong> in 1993. This was necessary to respond to concerns about<br />

the ageing <strong>and</strong> general health status of many of these pines.<br />

Other recommendaons of the 1987 Master Plan that were<br />

implemented included:<br />

• Replacement of the toilet block in the late 1980s.<br />

• Also in the late 1980s, four barbecues were removed<br />

<strong>and</strong> replaced by two new ones. (The 1987 Master Plan<br />

envisaged five new barbecue/ picnic areas <strong>and</strong> the<br />

upgrading of three exisng barbecue areas. A new such<br />

area was <strong>plan</strong>ned next to the Turner Preschool, which<br />

was recommended to be converted to a community<br />

hall.)<br />

• The concrete storm water channel east of Northbourne<br />

Avenue was piped, which opened up this key area of<br />

the park. (To the west of Northbourne Avenue channel<br />

baers were to be laid back as much as possible without<br />

impacng on trees to assist maintenance <strong>and</strong> to use<br />

rock work in some areas where steeper baers where<br />

needed. This work has not been undertaken. )<br />

• Planng works were undertaken in 2010.<br />

Appendix A to this report provides essenal further detail<br />

(in summary form) from the 1987 Master Plan; also key<br />

analysis <strong>and</strong> recommendaons from a major trees assessment<br />

survey undertaken by the late Robert Boden, in 2000. The<br />

Margules <strong>and</strong> Boden reports have significantly informed the<br />

development of this report <strong>and</strong> the associated Master Plan.<br />

Appendix A also includes tree management recommendaons<br />

made as part of this report <strong>and</strong> Master Plan.<br />

The irrigaon system was turned off at some stage to lessen<br />

water or maintenance dem<strong>and</strong>. (The 1987 Master Plan<br />

envisaged irrigaon 300m either side of Northbourne Avenue<br />

including the then exisng system. It is acknowledged in post-<br />

2000 water sustainability frameworks that irrigaon to this<br />

extent is highly unlikely to be implemented.)<br />

9 Boden, page 2<br />

10 Marn, page 39-41<br />

11 Boden, page 2<br />

2.2 Heritage significance<br />

“<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a significant l<strong>and</strong>scape feature of Canberra,<br />

demonstrang the early establishment of <strong>plan</strong>ngs in<br />

the city for protecon from wind, climac extremes <strong>and</strong><br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape beauficaon. The <strong>Park</strong> is parcularly significant<br />

for its designed funcon as a windbreak to protect the<br />

developing suburbs of Braddon <strong>and</strong> Turner from dust-laden<br />

north-westerly winds.<br />

Constructed around 1921-23 it extends for over 1,780<br />

metres <strong>and</strong> comprises fourteen rows of mixed evergreen<br />

<strong>and</strong> deciduous tree species. The selecon, mix <strong>and</strong> layout<br />

of trees are part of the design <strong>and</strong> aesthec quality of<br />

the <strong>Park</strong>. This is a rare example of windbreak <strong>plan</strong>ng on<br />

a large scale <strong>and</strong> remains highly intact. It is considered<br />

unique for an Australian urban park due to the linear<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ng framework on which it is based.<br />

The selecon, mix <strong>and</strong> layout of trees are part of the design<br />

aesthec quality of the park. Following expansion of the city<br />

further north, the <strong>Park</strong> has become an integral component<br />

of the l<strong>and</strong>scaped open space system between the adjoining<br />

suburbs, reflecng contemporary Garden City <strong>plan</strong>ning.<br />

The <strong>Park</strong> is highly valued for its history, heritage <strong>and</strong><br />

recreaonal opportunies by the Canberra community,<br />

parcularly the local Turner <strong>and</strong> Braddon residents.<br />

Thomas Charles George Weston designed the layout <strong>and</strong><br />

supervised the inial <strong>plan</strong>ng of the <strong>Park</strong> <strong>and</strong> played a<br />

seminal role in the early l<strong>and</strong>scape design <strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ng<br />

program in the Naonal Capital. Other significant<br />

contributors were Lindsay Pryor <strong>and</strong> the NCDC who<br />

insgated the coup method of tree replacement in the<br />

1980’s.” 12<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> was:<br />

• in 1982, classified by the Naonal Trust of Australia<br />

(<strong>ACT</strong>)<br />

• in 1988, listed on the <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Register (Entry No.<br />

20063) as a significant l<strong>and</strong>scape feature <strong>and</strong> for the<br />

mass <strong>plan</strong>ng of nine different species of tree, <strong>and</strong><br />

• in 2000, tabled as a Variaon to the <strong>Territory</strong> Plan<br />

Heritage Places Register.<br />

DRAFT<br />

3 The study area<br />

3.1 Site descripon<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is located in Canberra’s inner north, encompassed<br />

by the suburbs of Turner <strong>and</strong> Braddon (refer Figure 1). It is<br />

1780m long <strong>and</strong> 143m wide for all but a small wider secon<br />

near McCaughey Street, Turner. It is a significant space at<br />

the northern edge of the city central commercial area. It<br />

is almost enrely bounded by roads, with Masson Street<br />

(Turner) <strong>and</strong> Girrahween Street (Braddon) being the most<br />

heavily trafficked along the south–west <strong>and</strong> south–east<br />

secons of the park, respecvely. Limestone Avenue to the<br />

east <strong>and</strong> Frogga Street to the west bound the park in<br />

12 Marn, page 74<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 9


Image 4: The Sullivans Creek corridor bisects <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> West,<br />

incorporang both passive <strong>and</strong> acve modes of pedestrian acvity into<br />

the <strong>Park</strong> via the open grassed banks <strong>and</strong> community trunk shared use path<br />

respecvely.<br />

Image 6: Exisng seang area set into the l<strong>and</strong>scape. This locaon has high<br />

sun access as few adjacent large shade trees exist. This differs from other<br />

more shaded focal seang or barbecue areas in the <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

Image 5: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> bounded primarily by low to medium residenal<br />

development. It caters primarily to the residents of Turner, Braddon &<br />

O’Connor.<br />

Image 7: Wide spacing between the southern street trees <strong>and</strong> the denser<br />

park rows is ulised by car parks in some areas. This also offers the potenal<br />

for a pleasant shaded east-west pathway set back from the road for a more<br />

park like experience than a kerb side path.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Image 8: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> viewed eastwards<br />

from above Turner in the early 1980’s.<br />

Sullivans Creek corridor in foreground<br />

with the contrasng autumn<br />

yellows is a seasonal feature worth<br />

preserving. Current apartment <strong>and</strong><br />

commercial developments in the quarter<br />

of a century since, intensify<br />

pressures on <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

NOTE: Significant linkage potenal of<br />

both open space corridors. <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

as a key east-west link (even from Mt<br />

Ainslie to Black Mountain for<br />

walking enthusiasts) <strong>and</strong> Sullivans<br />

Creek as the main north-south cycle/<br />

pedestrian open space route.<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 10


those direcons while Henty Street (Turner) <strong>and</strong> Greenway<br />

Street (Braddon) form the northern boundary. Northbourne<br />

Avenue bisects the park, effecvely creang a barrier <strong>and</strong><br />

dividing the park into two secons, with further lesser (but<br />

sll busy at peak mes) roads bisecng it further (Torrens<br />

Street, in the east, <strong>and</strong> McCaughey Street, in the west).<br />

The Braddon commercial district, adjacent to Northbourne<br />

Avenue, is centrally located on its south side <strong>and</strong> it, along<br />

with the city centre just beyond, contributes to a high<br />

volume of pedestrian <strong>and</strong> cycle traffic through the park.<br />

Sullivans Creek divides the western secon. The Sullivans<br />

Creek trunk shared use path has high volume pedestrian<br />

<strong>and</strong> cyclist traffic (mainly commuter traffic).<br />

3.2 L<strong>and</strong>scape character<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is characterised by mature vegetaon in formal<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ng rows that run the length of the park. With the<br />

excepon of some large Phonia shrub <strong>plan</strong>ngs near<br />

the outer rows (mainly to the eastern end), the park has<br />

no understorey <strong>plan</strong>ngs. This allows a free roaming<br />

circulaon paern.<br />

Original <strong>plan</strong>ngs were laid out in 14 rows (refer Figures<br />

3 <strong>and</strong> 4). Cedar <strong>and</strong> Pine tree rows form the ‘leading<br />

permanent feature’ of the park, accounng for the large<br />

majority of <strong>plan</strong>ngs. 13 Rows were generally <strong>plan</strong>ted<br />

at spacings of 20 feet (6.1m), much denser than the<br />

deciduous <strong>and</strong> street tree rows on the periphery, <strong>plan</strong>ted at<br />

40 feet (12.2m) spacings.<br />

Quercus palustris (Pin Oak) is the primary deciduous<br />

species in the park, with these rows inter<strong>plan</strong>ted in<br />

some areas with a Fraxinus species. The street tree rows<br />

comprise Fraxinus <strong>and</strong> Cedrus species to the south <strong>and</strong><br />

Eucalyptus species to the north (refer Figures 3 <strong>and</strong> 4).<br />

The formal linear structure of the <strong>plan</strong>ng is broken where<br />

the Sullivans Creek floodway channel bisects the park.<br />

Here, Poplar species have been <strong>plan</strong>ted in a more organic<br />

<strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>om paern. Only around 20, aer the removal of<br />

10 in 2010 due to their declining state (refer Images 4 <strong>and</strong><br />

8, also Appendix A).<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is what might be described as a simple <strong>and</strong><br />

natural park on the ground <strong>plan</strong>e, in that it is of a plain<br />

character, the ground cover is dryl<strong>and</strong> grass (i.e. there are<br />

no formal grassed areas nor many formal pathways <strong>and</strong><br />

hardscapes). It invites informal <strong>and</strong> relaxed use amongst<br />

the formality of the tree <strong>plan</strong>ngs. The primarily exoc<br />

tree species palee provides seasonal colour, the varying<br />

deciduous <strong>and</strong> evergreen foliage providing contrast <strong>and</strong><br />

interest. This mix of species <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s significant<br />

contribuon to the inner northern open space network<br />

is highly valued by the surrounding community. This<br />

was evident at the consultaons that occurred during<br />

the development of this Master Plan <strong>and</strong> the associated<br />

Conservaon Management Plan.<br />

Whilst much of the understorey shrub vegetaon <strong>and</strong><br />

13 Boden, page 1<br />

original Roman Cypress <strong>plan</strong>ngs have been removed over<br />

the years, there are two areas where the original 1921<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ng design is sll more evident. These have been<br />

proposed as ‘Heritage Integrity Zones’, given they best<br />

represent the original <strong>plan</strong>ng (refer Secon 3.4).<br />

3.3 Role <strong>and</strong> current uses<br />

Research undertaken during the development of this<br />

Master Plan, including community consultaon, helped<br />

build a picture of current use of the park. Whilst the park<br />

was designed as a shelter belt for the early city, by the<br />

1950s it was absorbed into urban expansion to become a<br />

community park, as it is today. It is used both passively <strong>and</strong><br />

acvely by nearby residents, commuters, local business<br />

workers’ <strong>and</strong> others. It is an aracve green space for<br />

walking, running, observing <strong>and</strong> community gatherings for<br />

local residents. Its value as a habitat for birds <strong>and</strong> other<br />

wildlife as was noted in consultaons <strong>and</strong> idenfied in the<br />

Conservaon Management Plan. It is also a desnaon for<br />

the greater Canberra area, with people generally arriving<br />

by car. It provides for commuters, cyclists <strong>and</strong> others, either<br />

as they are passing through or as a passive lunch space<br />

for local workers. Evidence of the park’s value by diverse<br />

groups within the wider community can be seen in the<br />

varied uses made of different parts of the park, in part<br />

determined by the interests of the adjoining community<br />

(see Secon 6.3, Spaces <strong>and</strong> Funcons for further<br />

discussion).<br />

Research found that 21 per cent of <strong>ACT</strong> residents said they<br />

visited <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> in 2007/08, <strong>and</strong> that people commonly<br />

visit city <strong>and</strong> district parks in the <strong>ACT</strong> for children’s play,<br />

walking through <strong>and</strong> walking a dog. 14 Social value analysis<br />

summarised in the Conservaon Management Plan<br />

idenfies a range of communies having an associaon<br />

with <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. 15<br />

DRAFT<br />

The trunk shared use paths adjacent to Sullivans Creek <strong>and</strong><br />

McCaughey Street are higher acvity areas, with users of<br />

these paths being from a more widespread area: for them<br />

the park is a transional space between inner suburbs, the<br />

city centre <strong>and</strong> instuons, such as the Australian Naonal<br />

University, <strong>and</strong> suburbs further to the north.<br />

With lile understorey <strong>plan</strong>ngs <strong>and</strong> the numerous access<br />

points, informal, free form usage paerns have developed<br />

in <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. This is evident in the network of desire lines<br />

worn throughout the park. The formal pathways tend to<br />

be used mainly by cyclists, <strong>and</strong> some pedestrians, whereas<br />

a high number of walkers appear more inclined to follow<br />

desire lines, many of which are diagonally orientated (see<br />

Figure 5).<br />

From public consultaon workshops held throughout<br />

the design process (primarily local residents’ input), park<br />

users indicated a preference for the relavely low key <strong>and</strong><br />

informal undefined nature of the park beneath the canopy<br />

<strong>and</strong> the overall row formality of the trees. That said, there<br />

was strong support for increased diversity <strong>and</strong> increased<br />

14 MARS, <strong>ACT</strong> Sportsgrounds, parks, open spaces usage <strong>and</strong> sasfacon survey,<br />

October, 2008, TaMS<br />

15 Marn, pages 66-77<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 11


Typical Images (Source: Google Images 2010)<br />

TURNER TENNIS CLUB CAR<br />

PARK: OPPORTUNITY TO<br />

FORMALISE CAR SPACES WITH<br />

TIME LIMITATIONS TO MINIMISE<br />

CONGESTION IN PEAK PERIODS.<br />

ALLOWS MORE PARK USERS<br />

THAN COMMUTER USE<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

LEGEND<br />

CPK<br />

CHILDCARE<br />

CENTRE<br />

MAJOR NORTH-SOUTH ROADS<br />

DIVIDE THE PARK AND FORM<br />

BARRIERS TO EAST-WEST<br />

PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT<br />

CPK<br />

CONDAMINE ST<br />

MASSON ST<br />

OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE A<br />

FOCAL POINT/ CENTRAL<br />

<strong>ACT</strong>IVITY NODE IF THE LEAD<br />

SERVICES DEPOT WAS<br />

REMOVED<br />

LEAD<br />

DEPOT<br />

CPK<br />

AREA OF PREVALENT<br />

ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR<br />

AREA OF DESIGN OPPORTUNITY<br />

CPK<br />

McCHAUGHEY ST<br />

TORRENS ST<br />

CPK<br />

GIRRAHWEEN ST<br />

SULLIVANS CREEK CORRIDOR:<br />

- CONSTRAINS EAST-WEST MOVEMENT<br />

-PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE UNLIKELY TO BE<br />

FEASIBLE<br />

-OPPORTUNITY TO REINFORCE DECIDUOUS<br />

TREE PLANTING<br />

GREENWAY ST VERGE:<br />

-UNSUCCESSFUL PLANTING<br />

- OPPORTUNITY FOR OPEN<br />

SPACE WITH GOOD SOLAR<br />

ACCESS<br />

SPORTS OVAL<br />

CPK<br />

GREENWAY ST<br />

CPK<br />

HERITAGE INTEGRITY ZONE:<br />

BEST REPRESENTATION OF<br />

ORGINAL 1921 DESIGN<br />

PLANTINGS. OPPORTUNITY TO<br />

REINFORCE<br />

CPK<br />

CPK<br />

HERITAGE INTEGRITY ZONE:<br />

BETTER REPRESENTATION OF<br />

ORIGINAL 1921 DESIGN<br />

PLANTINGS. OPPORTUNITY TO<br />

REINFORCE<br />

MAJOR NORTH-SOUTH ROADS<br />

DIVIDE THE PARK AND FORM<br />

BARRIERS TO EAST-WEST<br />

PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT<br />

LIMESTONE AVENUE<br />

DRAFT<br />

HENTY ST<br />

BARRIERS TO PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT<br />

CPK<br />

CPK<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

0 10 50 100 200<br />

(m)<br />

N<br />

AREA OF CONSTRAINT TO DESIGN<br />

Figure 2: Opportunies & Constraints<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 12


use of the park for informal leisure, so long as the overall<br />

value of the park is not compromised. It was suggested<br />

there was significant opportunity to provide local residents<br />

<strong>and</strong> the park users with historical, l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> contextual<br />

informaon through good quality interpretave signage.<br />

Suggesons for improved facilies included sculpture <strong>and</strong><br />

a mobile café van, although overall those consulted were<br />

reserved about introducing facilies, parcularly as it was<br />

ancipated this would dramacally alter the character of<br />

the park. 16<br />

3.4 Opportunies <strong>and</strong> constraints<br />

4 Legislave framework <strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ning<br />

controls<br />

4.1 Legislaon, policies <strong>and</strong> strategies<br />

Overarching legislaon:<br />

The <strong>ACT</strong> (Planning <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Management) Act 1988<br />

determines the division of responsibilies between the<br />

Commonwealth <strong>and</strong> the <strong>ACT</strong> Government for l<strong>and</strong> use<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ning <strong>and</strong> management. Responsibility for <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> lies<br />

with the <strong>ACT</strong> Government under this Act.<br />

In developing this report <strong>and</strong> Master Plan, some key<br />

opportunies <strong>and</strong> constraints were idenfied (refer Figure<br />

2). In summary, the key opportunies relate to:<br />

• useable open spaces—create limited more useable<br />

open spaces that encourage greater acve use of<br />

certain areas of the park, without compromising the<br />

heritage values <strong>and</strong> overall integrity <strong>and</strong> sense of<br />

the park. This includes a Central Acvity Node <strong>and</strong> a<br />

second, smaller node, at the western end of the park,<br />

outside the heritage <strong>plan</strong>ng<br />

• heritage integrity zones—create two such zones<br />

encompassing areas within the park that best<br />

represent the original structure <strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>t species<br />

from 1921. There is potenal for extra <strong>plan</strong>ng in<br />

these zones to strengthen the park’s cultural heritage<br />

<strong>and</strong> ensure diversity in the spaces the park offers<br />

(refer to Figure 2, showing the locaon of these<br />

zones)<br />

• pedestrian linkages—there are many informal tracks<br />

across the path, there is opportunity to recognise<br />

some of these as more formal, yet low key paths<br />

• trees—in keeping with community desire for<br />

celebrang <strong>and</strong> maintaining the history <strong>and</strong><br />

heritage of the park 17 a primary focus of the<br />

recommendaons is on <strong>plan</strong>ng <strong>and</strong> re<strong>plan</strong>ng to<br />

ensure the integrity of the linear tree <strong>plan</strong>ngs is<br />

retained.<br />

Secon 6 provides further detail, including analysis,<br />

raonale <strong>and</strong> recommendaons.<br />

The constraints, as shown on Figure 2, can be largely<br />

summarised as physical constraints, namely, the restricons<br />

on east-west movement created by Northbourne Avenue,<br />

Sullivans Creek <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser extent, McCaughey Street<br />

(at the westerly end) <strong>and</strong> Torrens Street (to the east), all of<br />

which create barriers to pedestrian <strong>and</strong> cycle movement.<br />

There are also issues associated with car parking <strong>and</strong> the<br />

use of car parks around the park by commuters.<br />

The L<strong>and</strong> (Planning <strong>and</strong> Environment) Act 1991, subsecons<br />

5.7.2 <strong>and</strong> 5.7.3 require <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> to be managed in<br />

accordance with its classificaon as public l<strong>and</strong> in the<br />

<strong>Territory</strong> Plan.<br />

The Heritage Act 2004 establishes a system whereby places<br />

<strong>and</strong> objects with cultural or natural value, in this instance<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, are recognised, registered <strong>and</strong> conserved <strong>and</strong> are<br />

integrated with l<strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ning <strong>and</strong> development.<br />

Other applicable Acts:<br />

• Lier Act 2004<br />

• Hawkers Act 2003<br />

• Roads <strong>and</strong> Public Places Act 1937<br />

• Commonwealth Disability Discriminaon Act 1992<br />

• <strong>ACT</strong> Discriminaon Act 1991<br />

• Emergencies Act 2004<br />

• Domesc Animals Act 2000.<br />

Relevant <strong>ACT</strong> policies <strong>and</strong> strategies:<br />

• <strong>ACT</strong> Weeds Strategy 1996<br />

• <strong>ACT</strong> Memorials Policy 2004<br />

• <strong>ACT</strong> Graffi Strategy 2004<br />

• CUPP (PC&L) Irrigaon Policy 1999<br />

• CUPP (PC&L) Mowing Policy 1999<br />

• CUPP (PC&L) Sharps Policy 2000.<br />

DRAFT<br />

4.2 <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> specific <strong>plan</strong>ning <strong>and</strong><br />

development controls<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> as an area listed on the <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Register is<br />

subject to a range of specific requirements, necessary to<br />

protect its heritage status.<br />

In addion:<br />

• under the <strong>Territory</strong> Plan it is zoned urban space<br />

• the Naonal Capital Plan makes specific reference to<br />

it<br />

• the Turner <strong>and</strong> Braddon Neighbourhood Plans<br />

idenfy it as a key asset of these suburbs, <strong>and</strong><br />

• the 2008 Braddon Commercial Area <strong>plan</strong>ning study<br />

makes specific reference to the park.<br />

The following are extracted from the Eric Marn &<br />

Associates Conservaon Management Plan (CMP) 2011<br />

prepared in conjuncon with this Master Plan.<br />

16 Ibid, see Aachment 5, Consultaon Report, pages 7 & 9<br />

17 Ibid, page 9<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 13


STREET TREES:<br />

Eucalyptus cinerea (Henty Street)<br />

Eucalyptus paucifl ora (Greenway<br />

Street)<br />

Quercus palustris (Pink Oak) <strong>and</strong><br />

Fraxinus pennsylvanica (Red Ash)<br />

Cedrus deodora (Deodora Cedar)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Cupressus sempervirens<br />

(Italian Cypress) alternating<br />

Pinus Radiata (Monterey Pine)<br />

DRAFT<br />

As for rows 3 & 4<br />

As for rows 5 & 6<br />

Image 9: Thomas Charles Weston (1866-<br />

1935) in 1921 (Source: Naonal Archives<br />

of Australia)<br />

As for rows 3 & 4<br />

As for row 2<br />

STREET TREES:<br />

Cedrus deodora (Girrahween<br />

Street)<br />

Fraxinus oxycarpa (Masson Street)<br />

<br />

NOTE: Rows 1 <strong>and</strong> 14 street trees <strong>plan</strong>ted well after the 1921 rows 2 to 13<br />

Figure 3: Original Planng Row Setout (Margules 1987, ‘<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Preliminary Concept Proposals, p. 8)<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 14


4.2.1 <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Council<br />

“<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is on the <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Register so the full<br />

requirements of the Heritage Act 2004 apply.<br />

“Proposed work on the place (<strong>Park</strong>) will require referral<br />

of the proposal by the Approval Authority to the Heritage<br />

Council for advice. Heritage Guidelines will specify the<br />

conservaon objecves applicable to the place <strong>and</strong> its<br />

constuent parts. Nevertheless, all proposals for change to<br />

the place should involve consultaon with the <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage<br />

Council.<br />

of its objecves for upgrading safety <strong>and</strong> public comfort. It<br />

highlights concern about the safety of walking in <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

at night due to poor lighng, suggesng an assessment of<br />

lighng <strong>and</strong> sightlines, with the possible removal of lower<br />

tree limbs, is warranted.<br />

Braddon Implementaon Plan (2011)<br />

An implementaon <strong>plan</strong> to guide the future development<br />

of the Braddon commercial area is currently being prepared<br />

by the Economic Development Directorate (Strategic<br />

Projects) <strong>and</strong> a dra is expected to be released for<br />

comment late in 2011.<br />

“Under the Heritage Act 2004, the <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Council<br />

has idenfied intrinsic features of significance <strong>and</strong> set out<br />

specific requirements for the conservaon of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. The<br />

site <strong>and</strong> trees are included in the list of intrinsic features<br />

contribung to the cultural significance of the place <strong>and</strong> the<br />

following specific conservaon requirements are given that<br />

relate to the site <strong>and</strong> trees<br />

“<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> be conserved <strong>and</strong> appropriately maintained as<br />

an urban park incorporang rows of mixed tree species<br />

consistent with its heritage significance as a windbreak.<br />

“i) Plantaon Species<br />

a. The species of trees found in the 14 rows shall be<br />

retained so far as is feasible on arboricultural grounds<br />

b. Replacement trees, where trees have been lost<br />

or must be removed due to poor condion, are to<br />

be of the same species or similar arboriculturally<br />

appropriate species <strong>and</strong> located in a similar posion<br />

to the original tree(s).<br />

“ii) Development<br />

a. No new development shall be permied where the<br />

development detrimentally affects the heritage value<br />

of the place.” 18<br />

4.2.2 <strong>ACT</strong>PLA<br />

“<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is zoned Urban Open Space under the <strong>ACT</strong><br />

<strong>Territory</strong> Plan. The principles governing open space are<br />

set out in <strong>Territory</strong> Plan – Open Space principles, including<br />

purposes <strong>and</strong> possible uses.”<br />

Turner <strong>and</strong> Braddon Neighbourhood Plans (2003)<br />

These <strong>plan</strong>s recognise <strong>and</strong> illustrate the important role of<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> to both suburbs. Located generally central to<br />

both areas, <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is a focal point of each community.<br />

The Turner Neighbourhood Plan, for example, includes<br />

general objecves <strong>and</strong> strategies to:<br />

• maintain the diversity of open space experience<br />

• enhance recreaonal opportunies, <strong>and</strong><br />

• link the neighbourhood via the provision of safe <strong>and</strong><br />

easy movement. 19<br />

Braddon Commercial Area Planning Study (2008)<br />

This document refers primarily to the Braddon commercial<br />

area to the south of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, but has relevance in terms<br />

18 Marn, pages 81-84<br />

19 Turner Neighbourhood Plans (2003), page 37<br />

4.2.3 Naonal Capital Authority (NCA)<br />

Naonal Capital Plan (NCP)<br />

Responsibilies are outlined in the Naonal Capital Plan<br />

(NCP) <strong>and</strong> the associated Development Control Plans:<br />

“The Naonal Capital Plan defines areas that have the<br />

special characteriscs of the Naonal Capital to be<br />

‘Designated Areas’ (see Figure 4 of the NCP). In these areas<br />

approval of works is the responsibility of the Naonal<br />

Capital Authority (NCA).<br />

In some areas, the Naonal Capital Plan sets out special<br />

requirements for development in the interests of the<br />

Naonal Capital. These areas include parts of Civic, l<strong>and</strong><br />

fronng certain Main Avenues <strong>and</strong> Approach Routes to<br />

the Naonal Capital, the Australian Instute of Sport,<br />

Tidbinbilla Deep Space Complex, Telopea <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>s,<br />

Naonal <strong>Park</strong>s in the Capital, river corridors <strong>and</strong> some<br />

Naonal L<strong>and</strong> sites.<br />

In general special requirements require the preparaon<br />

of Development Control Plans which are approved by the<br />

Naonal Capital Authority” 20<br />

DRAFT<br />

The NCP outlines the following specific responsibilies for<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>:<br />

“It is in the interests of the Naonal Capital to ensure that<br />

important open space places are conserved.<br />

Special Requirements<br />

Development of l<strong>and</strong> within open space places shall<br />

conform with development control <strong>plan</strong>s agreed by the<br />

Authority <strong>and</strong> forming part of the <strong>Territory</strong> Plan. The Plans<br />

are to meet the following:<br />

b. To conserve l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> environmental qualies,<br />

having regard to the historic <strong>and</strong> aesthec importance<br />

of the areas the following requirements will apply:<br />

c. Historical context will be considered <strong>and</strong> established<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ng paerns respected.<br />

d. Funconal linkages to other open space elements<br />

should be enhanced.<br />

e. Ulity of the areas for recreaon should be opmised<br />

to the extent possible within aesthec constraints.<br />

Provision should be made for appreciaon <strong>and</strong> use of<br />

the areas by visitors to the city.” 21<br />

20 hp://www.naonalcapital.gov.au/index.php?opon=com_content&view=arcle&i<br />

d=1154:development-control-<strong>plan</strong>s&cad=58:links-<strong>plan</strong>ning&Itemid=265<br />

21 hp://www.naonalcapital.gov.au/index.php?opon=com_content&view=<br />

arcle&id=1334%3A45-special-requirements-for-urban-areas-refer-figure-<br />

20&cad=58%3Alinks-<strong>plan</strong>ning&Itemid=1<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 15


Blank Page<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 16


5 Consultaon with stakeholders<br />

5.1 <strong>ACT</strong> Government stakeholder<br />

consultaon <strong>and</strong> public consultaon<br />

Public consultaon meengs, preceded by public<br />

noficaon, were held on 29 June 2010 <strong>and</strong> 23 November<br />

2010. Businesses located in the park <strong>and</strong> a range of<br />

community <strong>and</strong> advocacy groups were nofied via email,<br />

with public noficaon in the Canberra Times <strong>and</strong> <strong>ACT</strong><br />

Community Noce board on line. A leer box drop of<br />

residences bordering the park <strong>and</strong> businesses in Braddon<br />

was undertaken before the second meeng.<br />

The first meeng drew many comments <strong>and</strong> suggesons<br />

including:<br />

• recognion of the heritage significance of the park<br />

but general acceptance of suggesons to open up<br />

some areas (those where integrity was lower) for<br />

more acve community use<br />

• concern for safety, especially at night<br />

• issues of parking, footpaths <strong>and</strong> traffic<br />

• issues of drainage, kerbs <strong>and</strong> flooding especially west<br />

of Northbourne Avenue<br />

• the desire for beer amenies east of Northbourne<br />

Avenue (barbecues <strong>and</strong> seang) <strong>and</strong> for public toilets<br />

(<strong>and</strong> perhaps a café) west of Northbourne Avenue,<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

• consideraon of walkways throughout the park <strong>and</strong><br />

the possible creaon of a path/bicycle way along the<br />

southern side of the park.<br />

The second public meeng further discussed these<br />

concerns <strong>and</strong> supported the ideas presented by the<br />

consultants to address these issues. No further issues were<br />

raised.<br />

In summary, it was found that “the park is valued for its<br />

historic links to the early establishment <strong>and</strong> design of<br />

Canberra <strong>and</strong> there is concern to ensure that the heritage<br />

values will not be compromised in exploring design<br />

opons to improve access <strong>and</strong> diversity of park uses. The<br />

mature exoc l<strong>and</strong>scape character is seen as a legacy for<br />

current <strong>and</strong> future generaons from the early designers of<br />

Canberra [<strong>and</strong> this] is deeply valued. There is strong support<br />

for using creave responses to l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> signage to<br />

celebrate the history of the park.” 22<br />

Meengs were also held with <strong>ACT</strong> Government<br />

stakeholders including <strong>ACT</strong> Planning <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Authority<br />

(<strong>ACT</strong>PLA), <strong>Park</strong>s, Conservaon <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong>s (PCL), <strong>Territory</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Services</strong> (TAMS) <strong>and</strong> <strong>ACT</strong> Policing on 23<br />

August 2010. Others (including <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage) were invited<br />

<strong>and</strong> provided separate comment. There was agreement<br />

that <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> should retain informal, low scale facilies.<br />

There was qualified support for using exisng gaps to<br />

locate open areas that might support informal acvity like<br />

throwing a frisbee, playing cricket or football.<br />

22 Eric Marn <strong>and</strong> Associates, 2011, Conservaon Management Plan,<br />

Aachment A, Consultaon Report.<br />

Maers raised during consultaons helped set the<br />

direcons of this Master Plan, for example, the responses<br />

related to paths, a suggested café, lighng, the overall<br />

informality of the park, <strong>and</strong> for protecon of the trees have<br />

been explicitly addressed in this Master Plan <strong>and</strong> report, as<br />

have many other topics raised.<br />

6 The Master Plan—future direcons<br />

<strong>and</strong> proposals<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is an intrinsic part of Canberra. Images one to<br />

three <strong>and</strong> eight earlier in this report show it in context of<br />

its original <strong>plan</strong>ng as a windbreak <strong>and</strong> over me, as it<br />

become integral as a community park for the growing city.<br />

Its ongoing management must connue to be undertaken<br />

in a considered, structured <strong>and</strong> consistent manner.<br />

The key aims of this Master Plan are to:<br />

• reinforce <strong>and</strong> protect the heritage values of the<br />

park whilst incorporang carefully thought through<br />

upgraded facilies where opportunity exists<br />

• further enhance the experiences <strong>and</strong> opportunies<br />

available to users of the park, so as to encourage new<br />

<strong>and</strong> acve uses as desired by the community, <strong>and</strong><br />

• ensure that <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> connues to present as high<br />

quality l<strong>and</strong>scape space into the future , with its<br />

heritage values as a significant l<strong>and</strong>scape feature of<br />

Canberra preserved, valued <strong>and</strong> celebrated.<br />

As noted in the Conservaon Management Plan, “<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

exhibits outst<strong>and</strong>ing design <strong>and</strong> aesthec qualies which<br />

are parcularly valued by the local community. It is a major<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape element that forms an important part of the<br />

Garden City elements of North Canberra. It also provides a<br />

link between Black Mountain <strong>and</strong> Mount Ainslie <strong>and</strong> along<br />

Sullivans Creek as part of the open space corridor in the<br />

Naonal Capital Open Space System. It mixes evergreen<br />

<strong>and</strong> deciduous trees providing some colour <strong>and</strong> the mix <strong>and</strong><br />

layout of species is an important design element.” 23<br />

DRAFT<br />

The overriding principle that drives this Master Plan is<br />

that:<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s place is at the heart of Canberra’s heritage<br />

<strong>and</strong> Canberra in the 21st century. Consistent with its<br />

heritage citaon it should be preserved as a marker<br />

within the overall l<strong>and</strong>scape but there is scope for adding<br />

acve uses that will help make it a more interesng,<br />

welcoming <strong>and</strong> vibrant place, more appreciated <strong>and</strong><br />

enjoyed now <strong>and</strong> into the future by those who live <strong>and</strong><br />

work nearby <strong>and</strong> by the broader community. It should be<br />

celebrated, cherished <strong>and</strong> used.<br />

Proacve management will ensure the connuing longterm<br />

preservaon of the original design intent <strong>and</strong> integrity<br />

by:<br />

• ensuring the ongoing health <strong>and</strong> vigour of the<br />

dominant long lived tree species<br />

• removing extraneous <strong>plan</strong>ngs that are in<br />

compeon with the permanent species <strong>and</strong> not in<br />

23 Ibid, page 69<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 17


Typical Images: Exisng Vegetaon Character<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

JUVENILE CEDRUS<br />

PLANTINGS<br />

LEGEND<br />

10m PINES<br />

10m PINES<br />

7m PINES<br />

MISSING CEDRUS PLANTINGS.<br />

JUVENILE PLANTINGS AT 11m<br />

SPACING<br />

15m PINES<br />

MASSON ST<br />

Quercus robur<br />

PLANTED IN LINE<br />

ALONG PATH<br />

GIRRAHWEEN ST<br />

CONDAMINE ST<br />

Figure 4: Exisng Vegetaon<br />

10m PINES<br />

ORIGINAL Pinus radiata (1921) PLANTING<br />

EXISTING Pinus radiata<br />

NEW PINE PLANTINGS (Approx. June 2010)<br />

12m PINES<br />

McCHAUGHEY ST<br />

10-15m PINES 15m PINES<br />

10-15m<br />

PINES<br />

12m PINES<br />

15m PINES<br />

4 No. LARGE ENGLISH ELMS<br />

25-30m HIGH NOT IN PLANTING<br />

ROWS<br />

MASSON ST<br />

8m CEDARS AT<br />

CORNER<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 18<br />

10m CEDARS<br />

15 No. NEW PINE<br />

PLANTINGS AT<br />

9m SPACING<br />

SPORTS OVAL<br />

HENTY ST<br />

3 No.<br />

DECIDUOUS OUT<br />

OF SPACING<br />

GREENWAY ST<br />

HERITAGE TREE<br />

INTEGRITY ZONE<br />

THIS SIDE<br />

8m CEDARS (Some with<br />

crooked trunks)<br />

12m PINES<br />

GIRRAHWEEN ST<br />

12m PINES<br />

HERITAGE<br />

INTEGRITY<br />

ZONE<br />

LIMESTONE AVENUE<br />

18m PINES<br />

24 No. NEW PLANTINGS<br />

AT 8m SPACING (JUNE<br />

2010)<br />

DRAFT<br />

EXISTING Cedrus deodora<br />

EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREES (Quercus<br />

palustris inter<strong>plan</strong>ted with Fraxinus sp.)<br />

EXISTING STREET TREES (Eucalyptus sp.,<br />

cedrus deodora & Fraxinus sp.)<br />

NOTE:<br />

INTEGRITY ZONES RETAIN THE<br />

STRONGEST INTEGRITY TO THE<br />

ORIGINAL 1921 PLANTINGS<br />

HERITAGE<br />

INTEGRITY<br />

ZONE<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

0 10 50 100 200<br />

(m)<br />

EXISTING Cupressus sempervirens Stricta <strong>and</strong><br />

Cupressus sempervirens<br />

EXISTING PHOTINIA SHRUBS (Usually found in<br />

<br />

<br />

N


keeping with the original design intent<br />

• strengthening the community’s opportunity to<br />

connect with <strong>and</strong> enjoy the park, including by<br />

improved interpretaon of its place <strong>and</strong> significance<br />

of place, <strong>and</strong><br />

• upgrading the facilies <strong>and</strong> amenies, albeit on a lowkey<br />

scale in keeping with the relave informality <strong>and</strong><br />

simplicity of the park.<br />

As such, the primary recommendaons of this report are:<br />

• Planng. There needs to be a connuing program<br />

of tree maintenance <strong>and</strong> replacement of older or<br />

less healthy trees throughout the park to ensure<br />

the ongoing succession of park trees <strong>and</strong> the overall<br />

heritage integrity of the park.<br />

• Heritage Integrity Zones. Two heritage integrity zones<br />

should be created, in the areas that best represent<br />

the 1921 <strong>plan</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ng. In these zones there<br />

should be not only a program for replacing current<br />

trees as they reach an age for this to happen, but<br />

also there should be extra <strong>plan</strong>ng to fill idenfied<br />

gaps from the original <strong>plan</strong>ning. That said, it is<br />

recommended some small openings be retained for<br />

public amenity as acve open spaces (refer Secon<br />

6.1.2).<br />

• A central acvity node <strong>and</strong> focal space. A new<br />

acvity ‘node’ should be created within the park to<br />

encourage community use <strong>and</strong> acvity in this central<br />

area (refer Figure 10 <strong>and</strong> Secon 6.3.2).<br />

• Walking routes. Selected preferred routes (‘desire<br />

lines’) should have a higher quality surface <strong>and</strong><br />

where feasible tracks be combined for more stable all<br />

weather usability (refer Secon 6.2.2).<br />

• <strong>Park</strong> furniture <strong>and</strong> facilies should be upgraded for<br />

a more unified <strong>and</strong> consistent presentaon (refer<br />

Secon 6.4.2).<br />

• Interpretave signage <strong>and</strong> informaon. Selecve<br />

further addions should be made (refer Secon<br />

6.5.2).<br />

• Artwork <strong>and</strong> commemorave features should be<br />

installed (refer Secon 6.6.2).<br />

• Safety <strong>and</strong> surveillance. There should be addional<br />

lighng <strong>and</strong> select vegetaon removal to assist safety,<br />

parcularly at night (refer Secon 6.7.2).<br />

• Traffic reducon. Maintenance vehicle traffic in<br />

the park should be kept to a minimum to reduce<br />

compacng of tree roots 24 (refer Appendix A)<br />

6.1 Trees <strong>and</strong> other vegetaon<br />

“There is evidence that <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is valued for its historical<br />

links to the early establishment <strong>and</strong> design of Canberra.<br />

The mature evergreen <strong>and</strong> deciduous l<strong>and</strong>scape character<br />

is seen as a legacy for current <strong>and</strong> future generaons <strong>and</strong><br />

is deeply valued. <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is valued for Weston’s design<br />

<strong>and</strong> ongoing conservaon. <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is recognised as a<br />

l<strong>and</strong>mark defining the edge of the early city.” 25<br />

The defining characterisc of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is the extensive<br />

avenues of trees, many quite mature: the original <strong>plan</strong>ng<br />

was for nine species <strong>plan</strong>ted in 14 rows, east-west. Pinus<br />

24 refer to Aachement A of this report, Tree Management, page 37<br />

25 Marn, page 68<br />

radiata was the dominant species then <strong>and</strong> is today,<br />

although many individual trees have been replaced over<br />

me. See Figure 3 & 4 for the <strong>plan</strong>ngs as they st<strong>and</strong> today.<br />

The Heritage Citaon, in the statement of significance<br />

about <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s <strong>plan</strong>ng to protect the city from climac<br />

extremes, as well as l<strong>and</strong>scape beauficaon states: ‘This is<br />

a rare example of windbreak <strong>plan</strong>ng on such a large scale<br />

<strong>and</strong> remains highly intact.’ 26<br />

The intent of this Master Plan is to:<br />

• reinforce the tree <strong>plan</strong>ngs throughout the park,<br />

most especially in the recommended Heritage<br />

Integrity Zones where addional <strong>plan</strong>ng is proposed<br />

• ensure the ongoing heritage integrity of the park in<br />

total, <strong>and</strong>, at the same me<br />

• create a more vital, interesng <strong>and</strong> welcoming place<br />

that has mixed opportunies for park users.<br />

Following is detailed site analysis about the current<br />

vegetaon of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. (refer Figures 3 & 4)<br />

6.1.1 Site analysis<br />

Pine trees<br />

Pinus radiata (Monterey Pine) <strong>plan</strong>ngs in <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> are<br />

the primary feature species from the original 1921 Weston<br />

design when they were <strong>plan</strong>ted in two double rows<br />

relavely central to the park along its enre length.<br />

There is a wide range of maturity in the Pines. In 2010, only<br />

57 of the original Pines remained but were in decline. In<br />

his 2000 survey the late Robert Boden (one of Canberra’s<br />

most respected heritage arborists unl his death in 2010)<br />

predicted that by 2010 only 38 of the Pines may be healthy<br />

(see Appendix A). Over the years since the first re<strong>plan</strong>ngs<br />

in 1985 27 <strong>and</strong> including 46 that were re<strong>plan</strong>ted in June<br />

2010, over 600 of the original Pines have been replaced<br />

(570 were removed between 1984 <strong>and</strong> 1993. 28 So today<br />

the Pines are of varying sizes <strong>and</strong> maturity. This adds<br />

visual interest to the linear <strong>plan</strong>ng style. The majority<br />

of specimens are generally in good health, ranging from<br />

7–15m semi-mature to mature trees.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Cedar <strong>and</strong> Cupressus trees<br />

The Cedrus deodara species (Deodar Cedar), along with<br />

the Pines, are a leading feature tree of the park. Planted<br />

in three double rows, they are largely in good health <strong>and</strong><br />

mainly from 8–15m in height. The tree rows are largely<br />

intact with the only large groups missing from the furthest<br />

south-west <strong>and</strong> central northern rows. Some original<br />

Pine trees exist in the Cedar rows <strong>and</strong> are gradually being<br />

replaced as their health declines.<br />

In much of the park, Cupressus sempervirens trees alternate<br />

with Cedars in the <strong>plan</strong>ng rows offering a contrast in form<br />

<strong>and</strong> colour. In some cases this <strong>plan</strong>ng arrangement has<br />

deformed some of the Cedar branching <strong>and</strong> canopy form<br />

because of the ght spacing <strong>and</strong> the resulng compeon<br />

with the Cupressus sempervirens.<br />

26 <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Register, citaon 20063, <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

27 Boden, page 7<br />

28 Boden, page 7<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 19


Typical Images: Exisng Access & Circulaon for Pedestrians<br />

OBSERVED<br />

BICYCLE ENTRY<br />

POINT<br />

S<br />

CPK<br />

CHILDCARE<br />

CENTRE<br />

S<br />

B<br />

B<br />

B<br />

S<br />

MASSON ST<br />

CPK<br />

S<br />

T<br />

CONDAMINE ST<br />

CPK<br />

McCHAUGHEY ST<br />

WIDEN PATH TO 2-2.5m TO<br />

ACCOMODATE PROPOSED<br />

TRUNK CYCLE NETWORK SAFE<br />

USAGE DEMAND<br />

LEAP<br />

DEPOT<br />

S<br />

T<br />

B<br />

S<br />

S<br />

TORRENS ST<br />

BS<br />

BS<br />

PEDESTRIAN<br />

TRAFFIC<br />

CPK<br />

S<br />

S<br />

WIDEN PATH TO 2-2.5m TO ACCOMODATE<br />

PROPOSED TRUNK CYCLE NETWORK SAFE<br />

USAGE DEMAND<br />

HENTY ST<br />

S<br />

CPK<br />

GREENWAY ST<br />

CPK<br />

TRUNK SHARED USE PATH:<br />

A MAJOR ENTRY POINT AND<br />

TRANSIT ROUTE TO AND<br />

THROUGH THE PARK<br />

S<br />

S<br />

B<br />

GIRRAHWEEN ST<br />

3 No. TABLES, SEATS & BBQ<br />

GRAVEL AREA (NO BBQ)<br />

CPK<br />

S<br />

B<br />

LIMESTONE AVENUE<br />

DRAFT<br />

CPK<br />

S<br />

B<br />

B<br />

CPK<br />

CPK<br />

T<br />

S<br />

4 No. TABLES & BBQ<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

NOTE: VEHICULAR TRACKS OFTEN USE<br />

PEDESTRIANS<br />

N<br />

LEGEND<br />

MAIN PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST CIRCULATION<br />

(2m width paved trunk pedestrian <strong>and</strong> cycle<br />

path)<br />

PARK IDENTIFICATION & INTERPRETATIVE<br />

SIGNAGE BY TaMS (Installed late 2010)<br />

1.2m WIDTH (Unless otherwise noted)<br />

CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN PATH)<br />

Figure 5: Exisng Pedestrian Access & Circulaon<br />

TRACK ALONG AS<br />

NO PATH EAST OF<br />

LONSDALE STREET<br />

PRAM RAMPS<br />

HIGH USE VEHICLE TRACK- Unsealed<br />

LOW-MINIMAL USE VEHICLE TRACK-Unsealed<br />

HIGH USE PEDESTRIAN DESIRE LINE- Unsealed<br />

LOW-MINIMAL USE PEDESTRIAN DESIRE<br />

LINE-unsealed<br />

CPK 1<br />

S<br />

B<br />

0 10 50 100 200<br />

(m)<br />

EXISTING CAR PARK<br />

SEATING<br />

TB PARK TABLE WITH ATTACHED BENCHES<br />

BINS<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 20


Deciduous trees<br />

Quercus palustris (Pin Oak) is the primary deciduous<br />

species in the park, <strong>plan</strong>ted in singular rows offset from<br />

the road on both north <strong>and</strong> south sides by approximately<br />

16m. Smaller Fraxinus trees have been inter<strong>plan</strong>ted with<br />

variable success under the larger Oaks. Overall the Pin Oaks<br />

appear to be relavely healthy, although in his 2000 report<br />

Robert Boden advised that they would be the next species<br />

to be considered for replacement, that he expected they<br />

would start to decline in 10 to 15 years (see Appendix A for<br />

discussion). Visual assessment conducted for this Master<br />

Plan indicate that those in <strong>and</strong> close to car parks appear to<br />

be suffering, most likely because of soil compacon from<br />

regular traffic suppressing feeder root potenal. Many<br />

of the tree isl<strong>and</strong>s in the car parks now have no trees,<br />

which suggests that there should be a re-evaluaon of the<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ng condions <strong>and</strong> reconfiguraon of car parking set<br />

outs that promote beer tree growth.<br />

Within the vicinity of the Sullivans Creek channel <strong>plan</strong>ngs<br />

of Poplars, Oaks <strong>and</strong> Fraxinus (Ash) fragment the formal<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ng rows. From an aesthec <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scaping<br />

perspecve, this creates a good contrasng effect or<br />

interest.<br />

Four very large English Elm trees opposite Lonsdale Street<br />

provide an interesng contrasng feature in that the trees<br />

are out of character with the trees of the park generally, in<br />

terms of species <strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ng style. They provide a good<br />

break up of vegetaon <strong>and</strong> should be retained so long as<br />

they remain in good health <strong>and</strong> stature (currently they are<br />

in apparent good health).<br />

Street trees<br />

The street tree species selecon varies greatly from the<br />

northern <strong>and</strong> southern verges. Masson <strong>and</strong> Girrahween<br />

Streets, on the southern side of the park, have the exoc<br />

Fraxinus oxycarpa <strong>and</strong> Cedrus deodara, respecvely. On<br />

the north of the park, the verges of Henty <strong>and</strong> Greenway<br />

Streets have a primarily nave palee, Eucalyptus cinerea<br />

<strong>and</strong> Eucalytpus pauciflora.<br />

The Fraxinus trees along Masson Street extend into<br />

McCaughey Street providing a good blend of deciduous<br />

character when accompanied with the first row of<br />

oak trees. They appear to be in relavely good health<br />

throughout.<br />

The Cedrus deodara on Girrahween Street match the three<br />

central double rows in the park. This reinforces one of the<br />

key feature species of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

Eucalyptus in the open median spaces along both<br />

Northbourne <strong>and</strong> Limestone Avenue are a good contrast<br />

to the highly exoc <strong>plan</strong>ng palee of the park. Only a<br />

very small number of the Eucalyptus pauciflora (Snow<br />

Gum) along Greenway Street have survived since they<br />

were originally <strong>plan</strong>ted which is not unusual with the<br />

species in Canberra. The Eucalyptus cinerea (Argyle Apples)<br />

in Henty Street are an excellent representaon of the<br />

species in Canberra but as relavely mature trees are now<br />

approaching the me when they can be expected to age<br />

<strong>and</strong> decline (see Appendix A for a summary of Robert<br />

Boden’s advice <strong>and</strong> the follow up assessments made for<br />

this Master Plan) (also refer Figures 3 <strong>and</strong> 4).<br />

Phonia shrubs<br />

Phonia shrubs are present in the eastern secon of <strong>Haig</strong><br />

<strong>Park</strong>, with only a few instances in the western secon.<br />

They work well in providing an element of understorey in a<br />

park relavely void of such vegetaon. Like the Cupressus<br />

they are seen as more appropriate if they are limited to<br />

certain areas of the park as they pose a security issue with<br />

prevenon of adequate sightlines for passive surveillance.<br />

6.1.2 Recommendaons for trees <strong>and</strong> vegetaon<br />

• As part of an overall Implementaon Plan for this<br />

Master Plan, develop an on-going management <strong>plan</strong><br />

to ensure the replacement <strong>and</strong> connued succession<br />

of healthy <strong>and</strong> successful trees in the park.<br />

• Formally idenfy two Heritage Integrity Zones<br />

within the park, namely at the most easterly end<br />

<strong>and</strong> immediately west of Northbourne Avenue, both<br />

being areas that most closely represent the original<br />

<strong>plan</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ng of 1921.<br />

• Retain open areas le by recent Poplar removals<br />

adjacent the Sullivans Creek.<br />

Specific recommended acons:<br />

• Plant missing Phonia <strong>and</strong> Cupressus trees within the<br />

proposed Heritage Integrity Zones to return to a good<br />

representaon of the original <strong>plan</strong>ngs.<br />

• Remove the Photonia shrubs from all other areas<br />

(except the Heritage Integrity Zones) as the health<br />

or visual appeal of these shrubs declines. Do not<br />

replace.<br />

• Undertake <strong>plan</strong>ng to reinforce the original <strong>plan</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>plan</strong>ng throughout the park. See the Master Plan<br />

(Figures 9a <strong>and</strong> 9b) for proposed addional <strong>plan</strong>ng<br />

(beyond renewal) in the recommended Heritage<br />

Integrity Zones, to reinforce the 1921 <strong>plan</strong>ng <strong>plan</strong>,<br />

including Phonia <strong>and</strong> Cupressus species (refer Figure<br />

4).<br />

• Plant missing trees in tree rows unless designated for<br />

open areas.<br />

• Consider replacing only every second tree during<br />

the replacement <strong>plan</strong>ng in some of the ghter<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ted Pine rows (for example, those currently at<br />

6m spacings consider increasing to 12m). Reducing<br />

the overall <strong>plan</strong>ng density would promote healthier<br />

growth yet retain the strong row character.<br />

• Planng of new trees should take into account<br />

the desire for designated areas to remain open<br />

to facilitate more acve forms of recreaon (refer<br />

Figures 9a, 9b).<br />

• As the health of the original 1920s Pinus radiata<br />

specimens declines to an unsasfactory level or they<br />

pose a danger to pedestrians, remove <strong>and</strong> replace as<br />

required.<br />

• In the Cypress rows replace the Pine <strong>plan</strong>ngs to<br />

reinstate the overall design intent.<br />

• Re-evaluate tree <strong>plan</strong>ngs in the formed tree isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

in the car parks, to decide whether the <strong>plan</strong>ng<br />

condions are opmal or whether reconfiguraon car<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 21


Typical Images: Exisng Access & Circulaon for Vehicles<br />

CONDAMINE ST<br />

CPK 7<br />

REVIEW CAR PARK LAYOUT AND TIMING TO<br />

OFFER A MORE EFFECTIVE CIRCULATION<br />

AND CAPACITY AND LESSEN CONGESTION<br />

IN PEAK PERIODS.<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

MASSON ST<br />

CPK 5<br />

CPK 10<br />

CPK 11<br />

DRAFT<br />

TORRENS ST<br />

CPK 4<br />

HENTY ST<br />

CPK 1<br />

GREENWAY ST<br />

GIRRAHWEEN ST<br />

CPK 8 CPK 9<br />

CPK 3<br />

CPK 2<br />

LIMESTONE AVENUE<br />

CPK 6<br />

NOTE: ALL CAR PARKS (EXCEPT SEALED CPK 10<br />

& 11) HAVE POOR DRAINAGE AND SURFACING<br />

N<br />

0 10 50 100 200<br />

LEGEND<br />

(m)<br />

CPK 1<br />

EXISTING CAR PARK<br />

CONCRETE KERB AND GUTTER<br />

MAJOR DISTRIBUTOR AVENUES<br />

EXISTING TIMBER BARRIERS<br />

EXISTING RANGER GATE<br />

NO CONCRETE KERBING<br />

HIGH USE ROADS<br />

Figure 6: Exisng Vehicle Access & Circulaon<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 22


parking set outs is necessary to promote beer tree<br />

growth.<br />

• Monitor health of retained Poplars <strong>and</strong> replace as<br />

necessary with an appropriate substute not included<br />

on the Deleted Plants List (Design St<strong>and</strong>ards for<br />

Urban Infrastrucon 23) such as Prunus cerasifera<br />

‘Oakville Crimson Spire’, Quercus palustris ‘Pringreen’<br />

Green Pillar or Gingko biloba ‘ PNI 2720’ Princeton<br />

Sentry.<br />

6.2 Access <strong>and</strong> circulaon<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is highly accessible, on foot, by bike, via car <strong>and</strong><br />

public transport <strong>and</strong> the evidence is that it is popular for<br />

all user groups. As noted earlier in this report, research<br />

found that 21 per cent of <strong>ACT</strong> residents said they visited<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> in 2007/08. 29 For locals, as was confirmed during<br />

consultaons, the visits are oen much more frequent.<br />

There are two key aspects in terms of access <strong>and</strong> circulaon<br />

that are highlighted here.<br />

First, as stated above, <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is highly accessible. It<br />

does not have formal entry points, <strong>and</strong> it is considered<br />

these would not fit its natural, low-key style. What it has<br />

is a myriad of informal tracks or ‘desire lines’ that regular<br />

pedestrian use has created — they r<strong>and</strong>omly criss cross the<br />

park, oen in close proximity. There are also strong desire<br />

lines along the southern boundary indicang high levels<br />

of east-west pedestrian movement along this orientaon.<br />

These are in addion to the formal paths that generally<br />

facilitate north-south pedestrian movement. Figure 5<br />

shows both formed paths <strong>and</strong> desire lines, both well used<br />

<strong>and</strong> less used.<br />

Upgrading selected preferred routes of heavily worn<br />

pedestrian desire lines to higher quality surfaces may<br />

prevent further damage to the park, as well as provide<br />

beer all-weather routes for pedestrians.<br />

Formed concrete paths <strong>and</strong> the two bitumen trunk<br />

pedestrian/cycle paths present opportunies for creang a<br />

sense of arrival into the park, for example through lighng,<br />

signage <strong>and</strong> enhanced paving.<br />

During the public consultaon parcipants clearly<br />

expressed a desire that the park not become a myriad<br />

of concrete paths, that any improvements to desire lines<br />

(selecve hardening of paths) to make some of these<br />

into more formal paths be done in such a way that they<br />

remain as ‘natural’ as possible. It was felt many tracks<br />

could be consolidated <strong>and</strong> that this could include some of<br />

the maintenance tracks but that the selecon of tracks to<br />

be improved needed to be done with care. The provision<br />

of informal gravel paths would provide pedestrians with a<br />

more stable walking surface through all weather condions<br />

yet help maintain the lack of formality that is one of the<br />

characteriscs of the park that is highly valued (refer also<br />

Secon 6.8).<br />

29 MARS, <strong>ACT</strong> Sportsgrounds, parks, open spaces usage <strong>and</strong> sasfacon survey,<br />

October, 2008, TAMS<br />

Pedestrian <strong>and</strong> cyclist acvity along the McCaughey<br />

Street <strong>and</strong> central Sullivans Creek trunk shared use paths<br />

carry high volumes of cyclists <strong>and</strong> pedestrians between<br />

the ANU/ Civic <strong>and</strong> the Dickson <strong>and</strong> Lyneham areas. In<br />

addion to their passing through the park, there is scope<br />

for encouraging more people to see the park as a point<br />

of desnaon, or a stopping off point, within their bigger<br />

journey.<br />

Second, a factor in terms of encouraging greater use of the<br />

park is the issue of car parking availability for park users,<br />

where they have to compete with commuters using park<br />

car spaces during the working week.<br />

6.2.1 Site analysis<br />

The central areas of the park are used more heavily by<br />

pedestrians. Factors thought to contribute to this are the<br />

proximity to the Braddon commercial district, that there is<br />

higher density housing nearby <strong>and</strong> these areas are serviced<br />

beer by public transport from Northbourne Avenue,<br />

Girrahween <strong>and</strong> Torrens Streets.<br />

Pedestrians enter <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> via numerous informal <strong>and</strong><br />

formal entrances, although generally pedestrian access <strong>and</strong><br />

circulaon is highly informal, evident in the myriad of worn<br />

desire line tracks. The connued use <strong>and</strong> creaon of these<br />

worn tracks may have an adverse impact on tree roots <strong>and</strong><br />

resultant health due to compacon <strong>and</strong> erosion of soil<br />

around tree roots.<br />

The majority of formed paths facilitate north-south<br />

pedestrian movement, catering for a relavely definite<br />

movement paern. However, the clear diagonal orientaon<br />

of desire lines (Refer Figure 5) suggests that people,<br />

especially pedestrians, prefer more direct routes. It may<br />

also suggest a preference for free form movement on<br />

informal tracks. This has led to much of the inherent<br />

character of the park.<br />

DRAFT<br />

East-west desire lines (specifically along the southern<br />

verges) indicate a need for beer quality <strong>and</strong> more stable<br />

walking surfaces along that orientaon. Heavy road<br />

traffic oen inhibits fluid pedestrian movement in these<br />

direcons (refer Figures 2 <strong>and</strong> 5).<br />

There are 11 car parks dispersed throughout the park,<br />

which experience varying levels of weekday commuter<br />

parking. Southern car parks along Masson <strong>and</strong> Girrahween<br />

Streets tend to be used heavily by city workers despite<br />

parking me restricons (parcularly car parks 8-11). Car<br />

parks 3-6 are relavely accessible most days. Car park<br />

condions vary with the majority parally or completely<br />

surfaced with decomposed granite gravel. These surfaces<br />

present issues in adverse weather with poor drainage<br />

leading to pooling <strong>and</strong> water logging. Only the two central<br />

Braddon car parks are sealed (refer Figure 6).<br />

6.2.2 Recommendaons for access <strong>and</strong> circulaon<br />

As part of the overall Implementaon Plan for this Master<br />

Plan, a detailed <strong>plan</strong> should be prepared for upgrading of<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 23


West <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Residenal<br />

Zone<br />

Sullivans Creek Corridor<br />

Zone<br />

Eastern Turner Zone Central Acvity Zone East <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Residenal<br />

Zone<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

CONDAMINE ST<br />

WEST HAIG PARK<br />

RESIDENTIAL ZONE<br />

CENTRAL <strong>ACT</strong>IVITY<br />

ZONE<br />

McCHAUGHEY ST<br />

TORRENS ST<br />

SULLIVANS CREEK<br />

CORRIDOR ZONE<br />

HENTY ST<br />

GIRRAHWEEN ST<br />

GREENWAY ST<br />

EASTERN TURNER<br />

ZONE<br />

LIMESTONE AVENUE<br />

DRAFT<br />

EAST HAIG PARK<br />

RESIDENTIAL<br />

ZONE<br />

CENTRAL <strong>ACT</strong>IVITY<br />

ZONE<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

N<br />

0 10 50 100 200<br />

(m)<br />

LEGEND<br />

WEST HAIG PARK RESIDENTIAL<br />

ZONE<br />

CENTRAL <strong>ACT</strong>IVITY ZONE<br />

URBAN OPEN SPACE<br />

EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

(MERICI COLLEGE)<br />

SULLIVANS CREEK CORRIDOR<br />

ZONE<br />

EAST HAIG PARK RESIDENTIAL<br />

ZONE<br />

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL<br />

AND / OR OFFICE DEVELOPMENT<br />

CPK 1<br />

EXISTING CAR PARK<br />

EASTERN TURNER ZONE<br />

Figure 7: Exisng Spaces <strong>and</strong> Funcons<br />

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

(BRADDON COMMERCIAL DISTRICT)<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 24


pedestrian <strong>and</strong> vehicular facilies associated with <strong>Haig</strong><br />

<strong>Park</strong>, to achieve a higher quality amenity, reflecve of the<br />

park’s heritage status, its usage <strong>and</strong> how it is valued by the<br />

community. The <strong>plan</strong> should include recommendaons for<br />

reducing the number of informal tracks in order to protect<br />

tree roots <strong>and</strong> the general health of the park (refer Figures<br />

9a, 9b <strong>and</strong> 10).<br />

Specific recommended acons:<br />

• Upgrade selected preferred routes of heavily worn<br />

pedestrian desire lines to a higher quality surface<br />

<strong>and</strong> combine tracks where feasible. Paths should be<br />

of an informal character with permeable surfaces<br />

(e.g. stabilised granite) to maintain the park’s current<br />

character (refer Secon 6.8 Design materials <strong>and</strong><br />

finishes).<br />

• Two of the exisng narrow concrete paths across the<br />

park are already designated as part of the proposed<br />

trunk cycle route upgrades using both Henty-Mort<br />

Streets <strong>and</strong> Forbes-Moore Streets. This will require<br />

path widening to either 2.0 or 2.5m.<br />

• Regrass the desire line tracks not converted to gravel,<br />

<strong>and</strong> erect temporary protecve fencing to allow grass<br />

establishment. It is envisaged that the myriad of paths<br />

would reduce, although some tracks will re-establish<br />

<strong>and</strong> their roles will need to be considered during<br />

future reviews of this Master Plan to determine if<br />

these should be gravelled or retained as is.<br />

• Provide an east-west pedestrian pathway along the<br />

southern boundary. It should be set back 10 metres<br />

from the kerb, located between the street tree <strong>and</strong><br />

Pin Oak rows to provide a shaded pathway beneath<br />

the exisng canopy.<br />

• Key formed pathway entries could have an enhanced<br />

sense of arrival to <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> by integrang lighng,<br />

signage <strong>and</strong> enhanced paving or other elements<br />

consistent with the park character <strong>and</strong> that meet<br />

heritage <strong>and</strong> other agency approval.<br />

• Resurface car parks where appropriate to improve<br />

amenity. Gravel surrounds to the exisng trees within<br />

carparks is suggested to improve permeability.<br />

• Install a concrete kerb at the western end of the park<br />

to assist vehicular management to formalise the<br />

edge <strong>and</strong> match the road edges consistent with the<br />

remainder of the park as well as to manage drainage<br />

<strong>and</strong> prevent erosion (refer Figures 6 <strong>and</strong> 9a). Retain<br />

the exisng log barriers to help prevent unauthorised<br />

vehicles driving on the park.<br />

• Remove the M<strong>and</strong>alay Bus in car park 11. It is<br />

unsightly, rarely used <strong>and</strong> using mulple car park<br />

spaces.<br />

6.3 Spaces <strong>and</strong> funcons<br />

Physical constraints, namely north-south roads through<br />

the park <strong>and</strong> Sullivans Creek, divide <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> into several<br />

spaces. These spaces have varying spaal use, strongly<br />

correlated with the demographics associated with<br />

adjacent l<strong>and</strong> uses, which include residenal, commercial,<br />

educaonal <strong>and</strong> other recreaonal l<strong>and</strong> uses (refer Figure<br />

7). For example, the east <strong>and</strong> west ends are adjacent to<br />

primarily low density residenal development with<br />

relavely low park use being evident from observaon<br />

<strong>and</strong> feedback during consultaon research. The more<br />

central zones where there is higher density housing <strong>and</strong><br />

commercial l<strong>and</strong> use have more intensified uses <strong>and</strong><br />

movement through them.<br />

Generally local residents tend to idenfy strongly with the<br />

eastern <strong>and</strong> western ends of the park. This was expressed<br />

during public consultaon. The preference was to retain the<br />

exisng ‘low key’ character with minor improvements to<br />

furniture, paths <strong>and</strong> the addion of playground elements<br />

(refer Secon 5.1).<br />

The central zone, between Sullivans Creek <strong>and</strong> Torrens<br />

Street, has higher levels of acvity associated with its<br />

proximity to the Braddon <strong>and</strong> Turner commercial districts,<br />

the City Centre, the ANU, medium to higher density<br />

housing <strong>and</strong> beer connecon to public transport. This<br />

area of the park is also beer serviced by facilies <strong>and</strong><br />

amenies (refer Figure 8).<br />

One of the idenfied opportunies is to provide more<br />

usable open space that encourages greater use of the park.<br />

Although the formality of the tree rows means there is<br />

lile open space that is suitable for more acve <strong>and</strong> group<br />

orientated recreaon. However thereare several locaons<br />

within the park where there are gaps in tree rows where<br />

trees have previously failed. This provides an opportunity<br />

to retain some of these as open space at the same me as<br />

maintaining the overall <strong>plan</strong>ng integrity of the park (tree<br />

succession <strong>and</strong> re<strong>plan</strong>ng is a major component of this).<br />

Some areas, notably near the periphery of the park, are<br />

ideal locaons for such open spaces.<br />

It may be possible to selecvely provide a higher quality<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape space. Open grassed areas may help create more<br />

comfortable spaces <strong>and</strong> encourage higher levels of use.<br />

DRAFT<br />

One of the recommendaons of this report <strong>and</strong> Master<br />

Plan, aimed at encouraging greater or different use of the<br />

park, is for a Central Acvity Node with more intensified<br />

formal design. Such a node could create a contained space<br />

for a range of acvies. It would complement the overall<br />

use of the park <strong>and</strong> the primary intent of this Master Plan,<br />

which is to retain the informality of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s current use<br />

paerns <strong>and</strong> with the majority of the park in its original<br />

character.<br />

The busier central areas of the park adjacent to<br />

Northbourne Avenue have been idenfied as appropriate<br />

for a Central Acvity Node. Figure 2 highlights the former<br />

City <strong>Park</strong>s Depot (currently being used by LEAD) as a<br />

possible locaon for this node (the depot would require<br />

being removed). A second acvity node in the westerly end<br />

of the park immediately outside the heritage precinct of<br />

the park also has potenal to enhance park usage.<br />

6.3.1 Site analysis<br />

West <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> residenal zone<br />

The western end of the park is mostly used by Turner<br />

residents. Evidence from observaon <strong>and</strong> community<br />

consultaon indicates it has a lower volume of through<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 25


Blank Page<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 26


traffic than other areas of the park with it used for<br />

recreaonal running, walking <strong>and</strong> relaxaon. During<br />

consultaon residents also indicated it is highly valued as a<br />

pleasant outlook for the surrounding residences. It has few<br />

formalised facilies (such as barbecues <strong>and</strong> picnic tables)<br />

that might otherwise encourage long stay or communal<br />

group acvies.<br />

A central drainage channel on an east-west orientaon<br />

bisects the zone, dictang pedestrian movement to a single<br />

pedestrian bridge. No formal provision, except the bridge,<br />

is given to pedestrians <strong>and</strong> typical desire line tracks indicate<br />

preferred direcon of travel (refer figure 5).<br />

Turner Tennis Club <strong>and</strong> The Treehouse in the <strong>Park</strong> Childcare<br />

Centre provide intermient visitor acvity, but these have<br />

lile impact on wider use of the park. The unsurfaced car<br />

park adjacent to the tennis club seems to be used regularly<br />

as an all-day car park by many commuters who also use the<br />

park as a thoroughfare toward Civic via the Sullivans Creek<br />

corridor trunk cycle path.<br />

This zone has more open areas than much of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> due<br />

to younger Pine <strong>and</strong> Cupressus <strong>plan</strong>ngs in some areas.<br />

Some re<strong>plan</strong>ng is required amongst Pine tree rows <strong>and</strong><br />

removal of the Phonia hedge to the north may improve<br />

overall passive surveillance into the park from the adjacent<br />

homes <strong>and</strong> roadway.<br />

Sullivans Creek corridor zone<br />

This zone incorporates the Sullivans Creek concrete<br />

floodway which bisects <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. With the east-west<br />

drainage channel connecng to Sullivans Creek on either<br />

side, the area is effecvely divided into four separate areas.<br />

This limits pedestrian movement, direcng it along Masson<br />

Street toward the trunk shared use path.<br />

The trunk shared use path here carries high volumes<br />

of pedestrian <strong>and</strong> cyclist traffic from the city to the<br />

inner northern suburbs (Refer Figure 5). It provides an<br />

opportunity for a more formal entry point to the park for<br />

pedestrians, <strong>and</strong> one that could be reinforced.<br />

The trunk pedestrian/cyclist path along the eastern verge of<br />

McCaughey Street is also an important distributor route for<br />

O’Connor to the city centre or other southern desnaons,<br />

such as the Australian Naonal University.<br />

Removal of Poplars along Sullivans Creek in 2010 created<br />

open spaces in an otherwise relavely densely shaded park.<br />

Retaining these open spaces would be desirable to allow<br />

for the creaon of useable areas with good solar access.<br />

Eastern Turner zone<br />

The zone incorporates a scout hall/childcare building that<br />

generates intermient acvity at certain mes of the day<br />

<strong>and</strong> week. The adjacent carpark (No. 8) is used heavily<br />

as an all-day carpark (despite parking restricons), which<br />

creates difficulty for park users to access this zone of the<br />

park.<br />

There are high levels of through pedestrian <strong>and</strong> cycle cross<br />

cross traffic despite the lack of formal pathways, indicang<br />

a likely area for upgraded paths.<br />

No new <strong>plan</strong>ng is required in this secon of the park<br />

as Pines were <strong>plan</strong>ted in 2010 in large open areas in the<br />

southern rows.<br />

Central acvity zone<br />

This zone lies immediately to the east <strong>and</strong> west of<br />

Northbourne Avenue <strong>and</strong> is close to the Braddon<br />

commercial district. There is a large number of desire lines<br />

in this secon of the park, indicang higher volumes of<br />

pedestrian through traffic (primarily east of Northbourne<br />

Avenue) when compared to other areas of the park.<br />

This area has the most potenal to create a focal point,<br />

given the higher level of acvity. It has the potenal to<br />

include a playground to encourage the use of the park<br />

by a younger demographic <strong>and</strong> provide for neighbouring<br />

residences where no current local playground exists (Figure<br />

1 illustrates local playground locaons).<br />

East <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> residenal zone<br />

The eastern end of the park is primarily used by Braddon<br />

<strong>and</strong>, to a lesser extent, Ainslie residents, although their<br />

access, especially for children, is impeded by Limestone<br />

Avenue (refer Figures 1, 2 <strong>and</strong> 7). There is also some use<br />

from Merici College to the north, primarily as students<br />

travel to <strong>and</strong> from the college.<br />

This secon of the park has the best example of the<br />

original 1920s <strong>plan</strong>ng design <strong>and</strong> provides an important<br />

opportunity for one of the recommended Heritage Tree<br />

Integrity Zones (refer Figure 2 & 7).<br />

6.3.2 Recommendaons for spaces <strong>and</strong> funcons<br />

The more central <strong>and</strong> heavily used parts of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> should<br />

be considered for opportunies to improve <strong>and</strong> diversify<br />

the spaces, funcons, amenies <strong>and</strong> facilies of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>,<br />

in ways that will not compromise the park’s heritage, social<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural status yet may add to the diversity of use <strong>and</strong><br />

users, <strong>and</strong> overall appreciaon <strong>and</strong> vibrancy of the park.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Specific recommended acons:<br />

• A concept <strong>plan</strong> should be prepared for a Central<br />

Acvity Node (on the former City <strong>Park</strong>s Depot site) to<br />

provide a focal point or zone for community events<br />

<strong>and</strong> larger social gatherings. The site is a large open<br />

space, already without trees <strong>and</strong> with reasonable<br />

solar access. Figure 10 illustrates the design strategy<br />

<strong>and</strong> raonale of this recommendaon.<br />

• A powered site could be provided to allow for a<br />

licence for a temporary food/coffee van during the<br />

day Similar vans of high quality operate in Centennial<br />

<strong>Park</strong> in Sydney <strong>and</strong> near the Carillion (Lake Burley<br />

Griffin).<br />

• In consultaon with arts<strong>ACT</strong>, consider iniang<br />

a public art program with possible community<br />

parcipaon for <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> (see Secon 6.6 for more<br />

detail.)<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 27


Typical Images: Exisng Facilies & Amenies<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

S<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

S<br />

L<br />

L L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

TOILET L<br />

B<br />

B<br />

L<br />

L L<br />

CONDAMINE ST<br />

B<br />

L S<br />

S<br />

S S<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L L<br />

T<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

S L<br />

T<br />

L B<br />

L L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

McCHAUGHEY ST<br />

L<br />

TORRENS ST<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

S<br />

MASSON ST<br />

L<br />

L<br />

S<br />

L<br />

L<br />

GREENWAY ST<br />

S<br />

S<br />

S<br />

BBQ area 1: 3 No. TABLES, SEATS<br />

& BBQ<br />

GRAVEL AREA (NO BBQ)<br />

WITH 3 No. TABLES &<br />

SEATING<br />

B<br />

S<br />

B<br />

L<br />

S<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

B<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

B<br />

L<br />

LIMESTONE AVENUE<br />

DRAFT<br />

HENTY ST<br />

GIRRAHWEEN ST<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

T<br />

S<br />

BBQ area 2: 4 No.<br />

TABLES & SEATING,<br />

& BBQ<br />

NORTHBOURNE AVENUE<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

L<br />

N<br />

0 10 50 100 200<br />

LEGEND<br />

(m)<br />

L<br />

BBQ <strong>and</strong> / or SEATING AREA (Primarily paver<br />

<br />

BUILDING FOOTPRINT<br />

LIGHT POST<br />

S<br />

B<br />

T<br />

SEATING<br />

PARK TABLES WITH ATTACHED BENCHES<br />

BINS<br />

Figure 8: Exisng Facilies & Amenies<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 28


• Establish a second focal node in the western zone<br />

near the tennis courts, in the more open area north<br />

of the heritage-listed formal tree rows (refer Figure<br />

9a). Include barbecues <strong>and</strong> seang within the area<br />

to be perimeter <strong>plan</strong>ted <strong>and</strong> possibly children’s play<br />

equipment.<br />

• Provide for open grassed areas in high use zones such<br />

as the proposed Central Acvity Node, as well as the<br />

western major barbecue <strong>and</strong> seang area, in order to<br />

help maximise recreaonal opportunies.<br />

• Create a new barbecue <strong>and</strong> picnic area near the<br />

Sullivans Creek trunk cycle path to encourage use of<br />

the park by those passing through, as well as nearby<br />

residents, as shown on Figure 9a (see also Secon 6.4<br />

for more discussions on facilies <strong>and</strong> amenies in the<br />

park <strong>and</strong> recommended posions for barbecues <strong>and</strong><br />

tables throughout the park).<br />

6.4 Facilies <strong>and</strong> amenies<br />

Analysis <strong>and</strong> feedback suggests there is an opportunity<br />

to significantly improve the facilies <strong>and</strong> amenies of the<br />

park, albeit in a low impact style in keeping with how the<br />

park is seen <strong>and</strong> experienced.<br />

The current facilies—lights, seats, picnic tables, electric<br />

barbecues, toilets <strong>and</strong> rubbish bins—are what is required<br />

by park users but their varying condion <strong>and</strong> oen<br />

inappropriate locaons suggest that they are probably not<br />

meeng user needs as well as they might. Currently, the<br />

greatest concentraon is in the central areas near car parks<br />

6, 8 <strong>and</strong> 9 (refer to Figure 8).<br />

6.4.1 Site analysis<br />

Seats<br />

There are various styles of seang in the park, all mber<br />

(except for one metal seat near the Northbourne Flats)<br />

with the oldest being mber slab <strong>and</strong> newer seats made of<br />

metal frames with mber slat seang.<br />

There is no unifying element or design. Seats are scaered<br />

throughout the park in open areas <strong>and</strong> at designated<br />

barbecue areas. Seang is oen not located near preferred<br />

travel routes, suggesng it may not be fulfilling its role. In<br />

some cases seats are orientated towards enclosed wooded<br />

areas, rather than to open acve spaces, which should or<br />

might encourage use.<br />

<strong>and</strong> evidence of where there was a barbecue previously.<br />

Both use common materials but have different<br />

composions <strong>and</strong> layout. They consist of a circular gravel<br />

area containing 3–5 metal framed <strong>and</strong> wood slat benches<br />

<strong>and</strong> tables located around the edge of the area. The gas<br />

barbecues are brick with either le <strong>and</strong> stainless steel<br />

plates or moulded stainless steel plate <strong>and</strong> top. They are<br />

located on a concrete pad within a paved oval secon of<br />

the gravel area. Some have a bench as well as tables.<br />

Generally these areas contain a bin <strong>and</strong> a tap with a<br />

stormwater grated sump below. Although the barbecue<br />

areas offer the potenal to be acvity nodes, their average<br />

to poor condion suggests limited use <strong>and</strong> as such they do<br />

not reach their potenal. Opportunity exists to regenerate<br />

these areas by upgrading facilies <strong>and</strong>/or relocang to<br />

more appropriate sites within the park. See the Master Plan<br />

(Figures 9a <strong>and</strong> 9b) for recommendaons.<br />

Lighng<br />

Lighng is sparse throughout the park <strong>and</strong> is mostly along<br />

formal concrete paths, where paths meet road verges or<br />

paths run along the side of the park.<br />

Toilets<br />

There is only one toilet block, located at the edge of<br />

Carpark 8 (eastern side of Northbourne Avenue). It is a<br />

painted precast concrete building with a steel framed hip<br />

roof clad in corrugated Colorbond.<br />

Rubbish bins<br />

These are located throughout the park, adjacent to some<br />

car parks as well as next to barbecue areas <strong>and</strong> some paths.<br />

Generally, rubbish bins seem to sasfy user dem<strong>and</strong> since<br />

lile to no lier was observed during site inspecons. Bins<br />

are primarily of st<strong>and</strong>ard green 240 litre Sulo bin style.<br />

DRAFT<br />

6.4.2 Recommendaons for facilies <strong>and</strong><br />

amenies<br />

• Iniate a three-year <strong>plan</strong> for upgrades <strong>and</strong><br />

improvements to facilies <strong>and</strong> amenies in the park,<br />

working to a unified style, with locaons as idenfied<br />

in the Master Plan.<br />

• Develop a unified palee for furniture, lighng,<br />

facilies, materials <strong>and</strong> finishes that is appropriate to<br />

the character of the park.<br />

Tables<br />

There are few freest<strong>and</strong>ing tables, other those associated<br />

with barbecue areas (or areas where there were formerly<br />

barbecues). These are mber of generally similar design to<br />

the associated seang.<br />

Barbecue areas<br />

Of the four original barbecue areas, two remain with actual<br />

barbecues <strong>and</strong> only one is in reasonable condion (BBQ<br />

Area 2 on Figure 8, on the south side of the park). The<br />

other (near Henty Street) is badly deteriorated <strong>and</strong> in a<br />

shaded locaon, which is likely to make it less inving to<br />

park users except on hot sunny days. Another has tables<br />

Specific recommendaons are as follows:<br />

Seats<br />

• Upgrade park seats to a more unified style.<br />

• Reconsider seat locaons <strong>and</strong> orientaons.<br />

Reposion seang in appropriate locaons that<br />

are closer to the main trunk cycle path, pedestrian<br />

paths <strong>and</strong> gravel paths <strong>and</strong> in open space areas with<br />

greater solar access. Consider locang seang to take<br />

advantage of aracve vantage points.<br />

Tables<br />

• Repair or replace exisng tables to achieve<br />

appropriate seat <strong>and</strong> table heights. Replacement<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 29


Image 10: Suggested furniture style, Boon <strong>and</strong> Gardiner ‘Prospect’ furniture<br />

range. Provides a robust, hardwearing contemporary opon for installaon<br />

throughout the park. This Master Plan recommends that furniture in the <strong>Park</strong><br />

should be of a unified style <strong>and</strong> character. (Images from Boon & Gardiner<br />

webiste: www. www.boon<strong>and</strong>gardiner.com.au)<br />

DRAFT<br />

Image 11: Bega 8081 luminaire approved by <strong>ACT</strong> Roads for use in pedestrian<br />

<strong>and</strong> open space lighng in precincts where warranted to enhance the<br />

presge of the area. (DUS St<strong>and</strong>ards Secon 12: Street Lighng p12-49)<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 30


tables should match the style of new park seats.<br />

Barbecue areas<br />

• Upgrade exisng barbecue facilies (including<br />

associated pavements, surfacing <strong>and</strong> furniture).<br />

• Relocate the north-western barbecue area to a more<br />

open locaon to the west (see the Master Plan, Figure<br />

9a). There is potenal to locate adjacent to the trunk<br />

cycle <strong>and</strong> pedestrian path.<br />

• Install new barbecue facilies associated with the two<br />

proposed key focal areas being the western area near<br />

the Tennis Court facilies <strong>and</strong> also the Braddon high<br />

use zone ulising the former City <strong>Park</strong>s depot area.<br />

Lighng<br />

• Reinforce lighng along key paths <strong>and</strong> the main desire<br />

line tracks that are proposed to be resurfaced in<br />

select locaons to increase safety (refer Secon 6.7<br />

Safety & Security for more detailed direcon).<br />

• Use lighng to formalise major entry points into the<br />

park <strong>and</strong> to provide terminaon points in otherwise<br />

‘black spaces’ at the end of Lonsdale <strong>and</strong> Mort Streets<br />

in Braddon.<br />

Toilets<br />

• If <strong>and</strong> when funding is available, provide a new toilet<br />

facility in the western secon of the park. It should<br />

be close to acvity areas <strong>and</strong> is proposed to be near<br />

to the Sullivans Creek trunk shared use path (see<br />

Figure 9a). The design will need to be unobtrusive<br />

but ideally of interesng form. It will need to be<br />

low key, in keeping with the nature of the area, <strong>and</strong><br />

screened from neighbouring residences to reduce<br />

visual impact. Ideally, a toilet block should be close to<br />

acvity areas, as increased facilies could encourage<br />

longer stay acvies from families <strong>and</strong> other visitors.<br />

The locaon will also be determined by availability of<br />

sewer <strong>and</strong> water supply.<br />

Rubbish bins<br />

• Introduce bin enclosures for added visual appeal over<br />

exposed bins. (The style should be in keeping with<br />

new seats <strong>and</strong> tables.)<br />

• Add new bins at new barbecue areas <strong>and</strong> along<br />

key desire lines while maintaining access for lier<br />

collecon services.<br />

6.5 Interpretave signage <strong>and</strong> informaon<br />

Interpretave signage is essenal in <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> to assist<br />

visitor appreciaon of the park’s rich history <strong>and</strong> heritage<br />

significance <strong>and</strong> for way finding.<br />

6.5.1 Site analysis<br />

Before 2010, there was no direconal signage or<br />

informaon. Now there are two major park idenficaon<br />

signs, one minor sign <strong>and</strong> two interpreve signs.<br />

These signs meet many of the requirements for informave<br />

signage within the park <strong>and</strong> they have been well received<br />

based on the feedback during consultaon.<br />

6.5.2 Recommendaons for signage <strong>and</strong><br />

informaon<br />

• It is recommended that further interpretave signage<br />

(parcularly related to the park’s heritage value) be<br />

added to ensure ongoing high quality presentaon of<br />

the park.<br />

Addional opportunies for further interpretave signage<br />

include:<br />

• the Heritage Integrity Zones<br />

• selecve species idenficaon plaques on significant<br />

trees within the Heritage Integrity Zones, <strong>and</strong><br />

• addional interpreve signage parcularly in the<br />

higher used areas of the park such as the proposed<br />

Central Acvity Node <strong>and</strong> the Western Acvity Node.<br />

6.6 Artworks, feature lighng <strong>and</strong><br />

commemorave elements<br />

Artwork within the park may help reinforce the identy<br />

of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, add to the sense of place <strong>and</strong> provide points<br />

of aracon without undermining the park’s exisng<br />

character.<br />

6.6.1 Site analysis<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> does not currently include any authorised<br />

artwork, feature lighng or other commemorave<br />

elements.<br />

6.6.2 Recommendaons for artworks, feature<br />

lighng <strong>and</strong> commemorave elements<br />

• In consultaon with arts<strong>ACT</strong>, consider iniang a<br />

public art program for <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

• As part of the Implementaon Plan for this Master<br />

Plan, consider the potenal for the park as a site for a<br />

major outdoor art event, similar to a ‘Sculpture by the<br />

Sea’ event.<br />

• Ensure community involvement in any program for<br />

artwork <strong>and</strong> commemorave features, to establish a<br />

greater sense of ownership.<br />

DRAFT<br />

Specific recommendaons include:<br />

• priority areas for consideraon are the proposed<br />

areas of more intense <strong>and</strong> formalised park l<strong>and</strong>scape,<br />

in the western <strong>and</strong> central-eastern locaons <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Central Acvity Node, where a play sculpture could<br />

be a parcular focal point.<br />

• As proposed in the Webb Australia study of the<br />

Braddon commercial area, more consideraon should<br />

be given to uplighng the trees at the end of the main<br />

commercial roads (Lonsdale <strong>and</strong> Mort Streets) to<br />

highlight the trees as an aracve focal point rather<br />

than ‘black space’ as at present.<br />

6.7 Safety <strong>and</strong> security<br />

• Safety <strong>and</strong> security within the park was an issue<br />

raised <strong>and</strong> discussed extensively throughout the<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 31


Image 12: Informave Interpretave signage erected October 2010. Assists<br />

public underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the history of the <strong>Park</strong> within their community.<br />

(Images taken by Eric Marn & Associates 2010)<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 32


consultaons. Passive surveillance from neighbouring<br />

developments <strong>and</strong> enhanced lighng on key routes is<br />

essenal to safety <strong>and</strong> security.<br />

6.7.1 Site analysis<br />

Community consultaon idenfied that <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is<br />

generally not safe at night. The scale of the site, dense<br />

trunks <strong>and</strong> oen low branched trees make the current<br />

highly elevated lighng style ineffecve. Whilst <strong>Haig</strong><br />

<strong>Park</strong> does incorporate some lighng, its relavely limited<br />

internal coverage reduces passive surveillance at night<br />

A current <strong>and</strong> related project led by GHD is addressing<br />

lighng issues of the park within the immediate vicinity<br />

of the Braddon commercial realm. Current illuminaon<br />

is ineffecve to the extent that car parks on the edge of<br />

the park are not well lit <strong>and</strong> would not meet Australian<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

Community consultaon on this Master Plan idenfied that<br />

whilst lighng would be an effecve tool in ensuring greater<br />

levels of safety in the park during the night, higher levels<br />

of illuminaon would impact on neighbouring residences.<br />

It would also encourage more park use at night, which may<br />

prove counterproducve for safety.<br />

6.7.2 Recommendaons for safety <strong>and</strong> security<br />

The Implementaon Plan for this Master Plan should<br />

include provision for improved lighng along main<br />

thoroughfare points to promote more night usage <strong>and</strong><br />

allow pedestrians the opon of travelling through the park<br />

at night.<br />

Specific recommendaons include:<br />

• addional lighng along select main trunk cycle <strong>and</strong><br />

exisng concrete paths<br />

• focus lighng within the central Braddon district,<br />

lights with direconal hooding will help avoid over<br />

illuminaon of more residenal zones of the park,<br />

thus liming impact on neighbouring residence<br />

• selecve removal of dense vegetaon with low<br />

crowns (i.e. Phonia <strong>and</strong> Cupressus trees) as well<br />

as other larger trees within 5m of paths (total 10m<br />

width) to reduce potenal hiding spots<br />

• pruning of lower limbs within 20–30m of path to<br />

a height of 2.5–3m above ground level to improve<br />

sightlines <strong>and</strong> passive surveillance capabilies from<br />

neighbouring residences, <strong>and</strong><br />

• removal of Phonia shrubs from areas other than<br />

designated Heritage Integrity Zones to promote beer<br />

sight lines overall in the park. Thin out or remove the<br />

western Phonia hedge rows in parcular.<br />

• Implementaon of these recommendaons will<br />

be consistent with Crime Prevenon Through<br />

Environmental Design (CPTED) principles to aid public<br />

safety.<br />

6.8 Design, materials <strong>and</strong> finishes<br />

As noted in Secon 6.4 Facilies <strong>and</strong> amenies, the current<br />

facilies—lights, seats, picnic tables, electric barbecues,<br />

toilets <strong>and</strong> rubbish bins—are in varying condion. They<br />

combine original, historical upgrade <strong>and</strong> recent addions<br />

to the palee <strong>and</strong> as such there is considerable variaon<br />

between style, quality, colour <strong>and</strong> materials.<br />

Elements within the park most impacted by proposed<br />

future upgrade works are the paths, both the exisng<br />

formalised hard surface paths <strong>and</strong> those created by<br />

progressive wear.<br />

6.8.1 Site analysis<br />

Refer also to Secon 6.4.1 Site Analysis of exisng facilies<br />

<strong>and</strong> amenies including furniture, barbecues, lighng,<br />

toilets <strong>and</strong> rubbish bins.<br />

Current materials for formalised pathways include both<br />

concrete <strong>and</strong> bitumen.<br />

Bitumen surfacing is used along the trunk cycle/pedestrian<br />

shared use paths in the western end of the park, adjacent<br />

to Sullivans Creek <strong>and</strong> McCaughey Street. This material is<br />

sufficient <strong>and</strong> appropriate for the purpose along high traffic<br />

<strong>and</strong> higher speed pedestrian pathways.<br />

Formed 1.2 to 1.5m wide concrete pathways surround<br />

<strong>and</strong> bisect the park in many locaons (primarily in central<br />

<strong>and</strong> eastern secons of the park). These paths facilitate<br />

comfortable north-south movement in all condions (see<br />

Figure 5).<br />

Much of the observed pedestrian movement along worn<br />

desire lines does not necessarily connect to concrete<br />

paths, suggesng a hard finish is not necessary in further<br />

design. A less impervious material may suffice. Certainly, a<br />

preference for materials other than concrete <strong>and</strong> bitumen<br />

was expressed in community consultaon.<br />

DRAFT<br />

6.8.2 Recommendaons for design, materials <strong>and</strong><br />

finishes<br />

• It is recommended that <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>’s generally informal<br />

ground character should inform the material <strong>and</strong><br />

finishing selecons. This should be addressed with<br />

thoughul <strong>and</strong> considered selecon of furnishing,<br />

materials <strong>and</strong> selecons <strong>and</strong> a palee should<br />

be developed which is sympathec to the park’s<br />

character <strong>and</strong> historic links.<br />

• Guidelines for the selecon of materials <strong>and</strong> finishes<br />

should be established <strong>and</strong> aim at an appropriate<br />

visual fit to reflect the nature of the park.<br />

• Avoid the use of br<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> corporate colours<br />

which invariably change over me.<br />

• Ensure materials <strong>and</strong> finishes are robust, easy to<br />

maintain <strong>and</strong> v<strong>and</strong>al proof <strong>and</strong> whole of life costs<br />

should be carefully considered<br />

• Generally, materials for pathways should be<br />

permeable <strong>and</strong> of natural materials, in keeping with<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 33


Blank Page<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 34


the park character. Proposed acvity centres may<br />

require impervious materials in high traffic areas<br />

to provide a more durable surface with less formal<br />

treatments in lower traffic areas.<br />

Specific recommendaons aimed at upgrading paths<br />

efficiently, with lower maintenance <strong>and</strong> in keeping with the<br />

park’s character include:<br />

• widen exisng paths to facilitate high traffic volumes,<br />

using a bitumen or concrete finish<br />

• paths in <strong>and</strong> immediately surrounding acvity areas<br />

where high volumes of traffic are expected in peak<br />

mes should have a concrete finish. This provides a<br />

cleaner <strong>and</strong> lower maintenance soluon compared to<br />

gravel <strong>and</strong> a higher quality appearance, <strong>and</strong><br />

• surfacing of main desire line tracks should be with<br />

a gravel material with no formalised edge. It is<br />

ancipated that over me a blurred disncon<br />

between path <strong>and</strong> dryl<strong>and</strong> grass will establish a<br />

more natural appearance whilst sll providing for<br />

comfortable <strong>and</strong> safe pedestrian travel in all weather<br />

condions. (Formalised edges are suscepble to<br />

breakage <strong>and</strong> liing of the edge by tree roots whereas<br />

no edging offers a long term risk amelioraon <strong>and</strong><br />

maintenance benefit.)<br />

7 Implementaon<br />

The Master Plan (refer to Figures 9a <strong>and</strong> 9b) is intended as<br />

a strategic document to provide direcon <strong>and</strong> guidelines<br />

for future works as capital maintenance funding becomes<br />

available. It does not include detailed design of specific<br />

areas of the park <strong>and</strong> hence will require the establishment<br />

of a staged Implementaon Plan that sets out specific<br />

projects <strong>and</strong> the priority of their execuon. Such an<br />

Implementaon Plan has been referred to throughout<br />

Secon 6.<br />

Individual projects could then be implemented based<br />

on funding <strong>and</strong> resource availability. Alternave funding<br />

should be sought, if feasible, to supplement Government<br />

resources to ensure recommendaons made by this Master<br />

Plan are implemented as envisaged.<br />

The extent of new works recommended in the Master Plan<br />

is relavely limited considering the size <strong>and</strong> significance of<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. The extent of proposed works is clearly defined<br />

in Figure 9 (Master Plan). The Master Plan intent is to work<br />

with the exisng elements of the park <strong>and</strong> to reinforce the<br />

heritage value into the future.<br />

Once parcular projects are idenfied <strong>and</strong> priorised,<br />

they will be proceed through the normal project delivery<br />

process with the development of a Preliminary Sketch Plan,<br />

Final Sketch Plan <strong>and</strong> Detailed Documentaon – guided by<br />

the Master Plan recommendaons. Addional consultaon<br />

with key government <strong>and</strong> community stakeholders will be<br />

required as part of this process.<br />

8 Monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluaon<br />

There needs to be a monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluaon program. It<br />

will:<br />

• ensure long term objecves <strong>and</strong> visions are met <strong>and</strong><br />

maintained to a high st<strong>and</strong>ard but also are responsive<br />

to circumstances over me, including stakeholder<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> any legislave <strong>and</strong> <strong>plan</strong>ning changes,<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

• ensure that the Master Plan remains responsive to<br />

changing operang condions, climac condions,<br />

tree management <strong>and</strong> changes in available<br />

management resources.<br />

Monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluaon for <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> should be<br />

incorporated into TAM’s asset management <strong>plan</strong>ning<br />

system when that system is fully established <strong>and</strong> should<br />

include:<br />

• regular infrastructure condion assessments<br />

• regular recreaonal user surveys to ensure user<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>s are met<br />

• event use monitoring<br />

• tree <strong>and</strong> shrub health <strong>and</strong> performance assessments<br />

• public safety reporng<br />

• resource efficiency (low maintenance surfaces <strong>and</strong><br />

durable low maintenance furniture products), <strong>and</strong><br />

• review of car parking to ensure parking availability for<br />

park users versus commuter parking <strong>and</strong> enforcement<br />

of car park me limits.<br />

8.1 Tree management<br />

The trees within <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> are high value heritage<br />

elements. An adequate monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluaon program<br />

is required to deal specifically with the trees management<br />

<strong>and</strong> to ensure seamless succession in the future. Refer<br />

to Appendix A for detail of historic <strong>and</strong> future tree<br />

management recommendaons.<br />

DRAFT<br />

8.2 Traffic management<br />

Refer GTA Consultants Traffic Management Plan (Appendix<br />

B).<br />

8.3 Master Plan review<br />

Master Plan review <strong>and</strong> updang is recommended to<br />

reflect changing circumstances <strong>and</strong> priories (such as may<br />

result from increased density envisaged for Braddon in the<br />

coming decade). As issues arise the Master Plan can be<br />

reviewed to meet current requirements, either fully or in<br />

part. A five to 10 year meframe may be appropriate. The<br />

review can assess the effecveness of the current Master<br />

Plan implementaon.<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 35


Concept Images (Source: Google Images)<br />

DRAFT<br />

D1<br />

D2<br />

D3<br />

36<br />

DRAINAGE<br />

Rectify poor drainage in low points<br />

Extension of existing eastern pipework/ swale to lessen the park separation. To lessen costs,<br />

placement of low-medium fl ow sw pipework in the current channel a high fl ow swale above<br />

(to retain capacity) is suggested. The swale above to be battered back to achievable grades<br />

for maintenance <strong>and</strong> ease of park user access. Care will be needed to minimise impact on<br />

tree roots. (Alternatively consider if any merit in infi lling the channel with recycled plastic water<br />

storage tanks to recycle water for the proposed irrigated areas in the <strong>Park</strong>. Allow for storm fl ow<br />

SW bypass with no adverse backwatering higher in the suburban network).<br />

As for D2 but lower priority at western end due to lower current park usage <strong>and</strong> more adverse<br />

gentle channel grades that make added implementation diffi cult. Also a potential frog habitat<br />

in poor draining swaleto be considered if works proceed.<br />

P1<br />

P2<br />

P3<br />

P4<br />

PATHS<br />

If an east-west path (2-2.5m) link is desired then the preferred route is approximately 10m<br />

north of Masson Street so that close to the road for surveillance but not immediately adjoining.<br />

Locate between the street tree <strong>and</strong> mature deciduous tree rows for a framed, shady walk, run<br />

or cycle with appropriate connections to pram crossings <strong>and</strong> street lights.<br />

Focus paths in this area to existing traffi c lights with suitable pedestrian provision for user<br />

safety<br />

Retain existing path next to road in well used zone near commercial precinct, carparks <strong>and</strong><br />

toilet block<br />

Establish min 1200mm (prefferably 1500mm) concrete path next to kerb. relocate log barriers<br />

to suit.<br />

S1<br />

S2<br />

T1<br />

T2<br />

SULLIVANS CREEK CORRIDOR<br />

Retain more open character albeit divided by the Sullivans Creek major concrete stormwater<br />

channel. retain the mature trees within the zone while in safe health. areas particularly on<br />

the east bank offer larger open areas in a wooded setting without the rigid formal rows of the<br />

remainder of the linear park. retain for contrast <strong>and</strong> user experience diversity.<br />

East-west path link across Sullivans Creek fl oodway not recommended from Bowls Club<br />

to Greenway street(unless resources for a suitable wide span pedestrian bridge available).<br />

utilise Masson Street bridge & Condamine Street for access.<br />

TREES<br />

When these pines die, retain as open space.<br />

When mature pines reach an unsafe condition, replace with cedars to reinstate overall park<br />

tree theme.<br />

T3 Remove hedge when dies. do not replace<br />

T4<br />

Plant select either Pin Oak or Eucalyptus mannifera to reinforce failed snow gum street<br />

trees.<br />

T5 Retain as small open area by not <strong>plan</strong>ting 1-5 no. trees.<br />

T6<br />

Heritage/ tree integrity zone (100m west of Northbourne Ave). Good representation of most<br />

original <strong>plan</strong>tings. Plant missing photinia’s <strong>and</strong> consider new Roman Cypress where minimal<br />

risk to Cedar form.<br />

Figure 9a: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> East Master Plan (To be read in conjuncon with Figure 9b)<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan


Concept Images (Source: Google Images)<br />

Note: Images are not of <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>, but illustrate<br />

potenal character of proposed of elements.<br />

LEGEND<br />

PROPOSED Pinus radiata<br />

DRAFT<br />

B<br />

S<br />

TB<br />

PROPOSED Cedrus deodora<br />

PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE (Primarily<br />

<br />

Fraxinus species unless otherwise noted)<br />

PROPOSED STREET TREES (Eucalyptus sp,<br />

Cedrus deodora & Fraxinus sp.)<br />

PROPOSED Pinus radiata<br />

PROPOSED Cupressus sempervirens<br />

PROPOSED PHOTINIA SHRUB<br />

PROPOSED TABLE SETTING<br />

PROPOSED SEAT OR BENCH<br />

PROPOSED BBQ AREA<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

DESIRE LINES.<br />

NOTE: ALL OTHER TRACKS TO BE<br />

TOPDRESSED TO MATCH SURROUND-<br />

ING LEVELS AND DRYLAND GRASSED.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

TB<br />

EXISTING PARK FURNITURE<br />

S<br />

EXISITNG BBQ AND SEATING AREAS (As<br />

Noted)<br />

EXISTING ORIGINAL Pinus radiata<br />

MATURE TREES<br />

HERITAGE TREE INTEGRITY ZONES<br />

PROPOSED TOILET BLOCK<br />

N<br />

0 10 50 100 200<br />

Figure 9b: <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> West Master Plan (To be read in conjuncon with Figure 9a)<br />

(m)<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 37


Resolve path entry/exit to either ulise<br />

current low use driveway or for a<br />

disnct separate pram crossing to suit.<br />

(Improve <strong>and</strong> raonalise unauthorised<br />

park access)<br />

Realign path to retain mature tree<br />

when widening path<br />

Widen path to 2.5m (2.0m min) to<br />

suit designated trunk cycle network<br />

route. (Relocate <strong>and</strong>/or update lighng<br />

to suit)<br />

Hardy low shrub <strong>plan</strong>ng to reduce<br />

worn intersecon. (Temporary fence<br />

unl established)<br />

Direct new path further from exisng<br />

trees where feasible<br />

HENTY STREET<br />

IRRIGATED LAWN<br />

Retain exisng driveway (extend for<br />

van site)<br />

Recommend 1 hour limit on street<br />

parking to allow van patronage<br />

Mobile food & beverage van with<br />

bollards surrounding (not barriers so<br />

more accessible opons)<br />

Allow informal Petanque/ Boules on<br />

gravel area or construct a purpose<br />

built court (17 x 4m) nearby between<br />

tree rows.<br />

Current barriers <strong>and</strong> depot fence (<strong>and</strong><br />

gates) removed to aid park access<br />

Play sculpture (With a <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

Theme e.g. a pine conse sculpture)<br />

Low shrub <strong>plan</strong>ng (


Appendices<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 39


Appendix A: Tree Management<br />

SUMMARY OF PAST TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS (MARGULES 1983 & 1987 MASTER PLAN; AND ROBERT BODEN 2000) AND A COMPARATIVE TO THE 2011 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS:<br />

This offers a historic perspective of proven strategies <strong>and</strong> also where a new approach has merit either due to past less accepted outcomes or where past successes allow lower impact strategies to be implemented. Tree management is<br />

an evolving sequence responding to past actions; recent events (storms or lightning events, v<strong>and</strong>alism <strong>and</strong> development); forward projection of scenarios <strong>and</strong> how to best manage ongoing overall long term health <strong>and</strong> viability of a tree<br />

community to benefit successive generations (of trees <strong>and</strong> people!).<br />

A Public Consultation notice by the NCDC (Canberra Times 1984 reprinted in the 1987 <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan) nominated of the existing 2000 trees in <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> 1200 will be removed over the following 10 years <strong>and</strong> 1200 new seedling<br />

trees <strong>plan</strong>ted. The 1984 advice noted that tree losses at the time by species where Pinus radiata (530 of 1243 No. trees = 43%); Deodar Cedar, Roman Cypress <strong>and</strong> Ash 18 -26% <strong>and</strong> Pin Oak 4% of their original <strong>plan</strong>tings.<br />

GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND ONGOING TREE MANAGEMENT <strong>ACT</strong>IONS:<br />

MARGULES1983TREES<br />

&1987MP BODEN2000<br />

ENVIROLINKSDESIGN<br />

RECOMMENDED2011<br />

MP<br />

CENTENNIALPARK<br />

TREEMP2002(If<br />

assertsasimilar<br />

aproachalbeit<br />

differentspecies/site)<br />

Proactive corrective action needed to ensure long term preservation of original design intent (formal row character of largely exotic<br />

trees). (Heritage citation states replace with same species or similar arboriculturally appropriate species) <br />

Ensure ongoing health & vigor of the dominant long lived species. Re<strong>plan</strong>t Pinus radiata & favour Deodar Cedars, Pin Oaks & the<br />

street trees as the permanent long lived species. Re<strong>plan</strong>t missing Pin Oaks & Deodar Cedars. NOTED <br />

Preserve <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> as a marker within the overall l<strong>and</strong>scape as seen from the surrounding hills (Black Mountain, Mt Ainslie, Mt Majura<br />

& others). NOTED NA<br />

Remove dying & diseased trees, plus unsafe trees<br />

NOTED <br />

Remove extraneous <strong>plan</strong>tings in competition with the permanent species. Note in 2010 observed near the most eastern Girrahween<br />

carpark a semi-circle of new eucalypt <strong>and</strong> wattle <strong>plan</strong>tings out of character with the <strong>Park</strong> – therefore these should be removed before they<br />

establish.<br />

<br />

Remove Roman Cypress if they are competing with & hindering the Deodar Cedars or obstructing vision next to paths (retain<br />

others but not necessarily replace). NA<br />

Retain the spreading form of Roman Cypress recommended by Boden 2000 due to its rarity <strong>and</strong> use for vegetative propogation for<br />

further <strong>plan</strong>ting in Canberra. NA<br />

Trees in alternating species within the row are competing for water & nutrients <strong>and</strong> not allowing each other to reach a good mature form.<br />

Remove if poor health or bad deformation.<br />

<br />

(BUT USE<br />

ALTERNATES IF<br />

DOUBT ON DISEASE<br />

RISK IN AN ORIGINAL<br />

SPECIES E.G PALMS<br />

OR ELMS)<br />

Prune the Ash trees to favour the Pin Oaks with the intention of eventually removing them (or remove poor Ash). Do not replace Ash<br />

trees. NA<br />

DRAFT<br />

Fertilise all permanent trees on a needs basis.<br />

NA<br />

Prune the lower drooping branches of Deodar Cedars due to public safety <strong>and</strong> aiding maintenance eg. up to 2.5m above ground.<br />

<br />

X (ONLY ON KEY<br />

PATHS<br />

SUPPORTED)<br />

NA<br />

Similarly low branches of Pin Oaks can be difficult to see in winter so prune up to 2.5m above ground.<br />

NA<br />

Remove & re<strong>plan</strong>t Pinus radiata in blocks approx 100-140m long to ensure sufficient light (<strong>and</strong> less root competition) for good growth <strong>and</strong><br />

form.<br />

(NEXT TIME<br />

<br />

SMALLER BLOCKS)<br />

(FIGS IN AVENUES-<br />

BLOCK REMOVAL<br />

ONLY KNOWN &<br />

ACCEPTED<br />

APPROACH)<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 40


GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND ONGOING TREE MANAGEMENT <strong>ACT</strong>IONS:<br />

Retain photinia shrubs east of Northbourne Avenue <strong>and</strong> re<strong>plan</strong>t in wide spaced pairs as occurred originally.<br />

MARGULES1983TREES<br />

&1987MP BODEN2000<br />

ENVIROLINKSDESIGN<br />

RECOMMENDED2011<br />

MP<br />

CENTENNIALPARK<br />

TREEMP2002(If<br />

assertsasimilar<br />

aproachalbeit<br />

differentspecies/site)<br />

<br />

(IN SELECTED<br />

INTEGRITY AREAS)<br />

NA<br />

Acknowledged high visual impact of the 1984 -1991 replacement program but sensitive design & staging had reduced the impact to<br />

acceptable levels (note:1200 trees were removed & re<strong>plan</strong>ted or 60% of the 1984 total). NOTE<br />

Refrain from pine removals September to February when Choughs, Sparrowhawks <strong>and</strong> other birds are nesting.<br />

(SEE NOTE ABOVE<br />

ON FIGS)<br />

NOTED <br />

(DO HABITAT<br />

ASSESSMENT)<br />

Rejected option of more informality <strong>and</strong> species diversity to the current formal rows (note some scattered mature inconsistencies occur but<br />

retain if suits).<br />

Oldest of Pinus radiata 80 years of age in 2000 should be retained whilst healthy & safe. Undertake annual review. (Boden advised<br />

139 No. mature pines surviving in 2000 <strong>and</strong> predicted that a total 38 No. pines may be healthy in 2010 (actual 57 No. remaining in 2010).<br />

This retention action feasible as the over 600 No. pines re<strong>plan</strong>ted in 1984-1991 <strong>and</strong> the 45 No. in 2010 now offer an overall healthy pine<br />

age class due to the drastic but positive management strategy of 20-25 years ago.<br />

At age 15-18 years the Pinus radiata be thinned to remove weak or poorly formed specimens followed by thinning to leave<br />

approximately half the number of trees originally <strong>plan</strong>ted. This should be done in a diamond pattern to give trees space to develop.<br />

Stumps to be ground then topsoil <strong>and</strong> dry grass. Based on this Boden 2000 recommendation - supported by Enviro Links Design - the 1984<br />

– 1991<strong>plan</strong>tings are now overdue for the thinning recommended to occur Year 2000 – 2009. This has not been done to date. (Boden also<br />

observed the difficulty for some at the 2000 consultation walk to appreciate the effort required to <strong>plan</strong>t to then thin half the relatively young<br />

trees. Observations in the field by Boden are that young Pinus radiata <strong>plan</strong>ted at wide spacing tend to put energy into heavy lateral<br />

branching rather than vertical growth <strong>and</strong> require more pruning. Closer <strong>plan</strong>ting encourages vertical growth <strong>and</strong> better form. At age 15<br />

competition for light is starting to cause trees in adjacent rows to lean outwards. [Robert Boden has been long regarded as one of<br />

Canberra’s most respected heritage Arborists <strong>and</strong> a ‘man of the trees’. He passed away in 2010. The wider tree spacing after thinning will<br />

generally offer trees better health <strong>and</strong> form <strong>and</strong> the community a slightly more open sense of character <strong>and</strong> security in the <strong>Park</strong>, albeit still<br />

heavily wooded. The 2010 <strong>plan</strong>tings by PCL are generally at 8-11m along the rows compared to an average nearer 6m in the 1984-1991<br />

<strong>plan</strong>tings I was involved with with Ray Margules at the time. On my experience with him over many years based on his Forester <strong>and</strong><br />

L<strong>and</strong>scape Architect background <strong>and</strong> encouragement of thinning strategies with forward <strong>plan</strong>tings I suspect he also anticipated future<br />

thinning now that the windbreak function of the original <strong>plan</strong>tings isn’t now applicable in established Canberra. The proposed thinning<br />

regime would therefore be nearer to the wider more recent <strong>plan</strong>tings spacings eg 11m better suited to an urban park (Jamie Dawson,<br />

Enviro Links Design 2010 pers com )]<br />

NOTED <br />

<br />

(ACCEPTED IN<br />

THEIR OUTER<br />

WOODLOTS)<br />

(ACCEPT<br />

RETAIN IN THEIR<br />

OUTER<br />

WOODLOTS-IN<br />

AVENUES REMOVE<br />

WHEN<br />

DERIORATES<br />

THEN BLOCK<br />

REPLANT)<br />

NA<br />

DRAFT<br />

Boden 2000 recommended pruning of the lateral branches of the Pinus radiata be carried out gradually (no more than one third of<br />

the height of the tree at one time). Formative pruning to avoid double leaders <strong>and</strong> heavy side branches should also be carried out. (These<br />

instances if not pruned can have a propensity for later higher incidences of limb drop). Also protect young tree bases from mower <strong>and</strong><br />

whipper snipper damage.<br />

NA<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 41


Boden 2000 advised that the success rate of some recent <strong>plan</strong>tings less than desired to achieve a balanced <strong>plan</strong>ting so that where three or<br />

more spaces do supplementary <strong>plan</strong>tings. Evidence in 2010 that PCL has been doing this in some areas <strong>and</strong> this should be continued as a<br />

management strategy to reflect the desired thinned spacing as needed. Exceptions are near major paths where added setback could be<br />

advantageous to security <strong>and</strong> lights lumination.<br />

NA<br />

GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND ONGOING TREE MANAGEMENT <strong>ACT</strong>IONS:<br />

MARGULES1983TREES<br />

&1987MP BODEN2000<br />

ENVIROLINKSDESIGN<br />

RECOMMENDED2011<br />

MP<br />

CENTENNIALPARK<br />

TREEMP2002(If<br />

assertsasimilar<br />

aproachalbeit<br />

differentspecies/site)<br />

Encourage <strong>Park</strong> building occupiers <strong>and</strong> the general community to be conservation custodians of areas near them under management<br />

guidance of acceptable <strong>and</strong> safe practices. NA<br />

Boden 2000 advised that the next species to be considered for replacement will be Pin Oaks as some Pin Oaks will start to decline<br />

<strong>and</strong> present a safety risk within the next 10-15 years (equates to 2010-2015.) One or two in the sealed carparks are showing signs of<br />

decline in 2000 due to adverse compaction <strong>and</strong> sealing close to trunks. In 2010 similar impacts are evident in some gravel or part sealed<br />

carparks. Boden recommends that when Pin Oaks removed in carparks they not be replaced as the adjacent Cedars provide sufficient<br />

shade.<br />

Boden identified 3 options for replacing the Pin Oaks being:<br />

NA<br />

(a) Remove <strong>and</strong> replace in the same position: Cannot commence until the trees decline <strong>and</strong> are removed. Result an uneven aged<br />

<strong>plan</strong>ting. X X<br />

(b) Plant Pin Oaks in the positions vacated by the Red Ash along the same row alignment: Planting could commence <strong>and</strong> generally be well<br />

established prior to Pin Oak removals. Enviro Links Design believe that this approach would be successful for the southern row of Pin Oaks<br />

despite reasonable shaded competition (<strong>and</strong> allow retention of the well established street tree avenue to Masson <strong>and</strong> Girrahween Streets).<br />

If this program is not immediate then consideration of the current missing Pin Oak spacing infill <strong>plan</strong>tings could commence. Please note<br />

that with the Pin Oak rows in particular due to carparks that gaps in continual even spaced rows occur such that spacings realistically will<br />

be reasonably variable yet signify the original intent.<br />

(c) Plant Pin Oaks on the Photinia alignment opposite the Red Ash positions: Planting could commence <strong>and</strong> generally be well established<br />

prior to Pin Oak removals. Enviro Links Design believe that this approach would be successful for the northern row of Pin Oaks <strong>and</strong> even<br />

<strong>plan</strong>t marginally closer to the eucalypt street tree alignment to offer greater separation to assist long term minimal crown branching<br />

deformation between the Cedars <strong>and</strong> the Pin Oaks; <strong>and</strong> also open up the potential that the street tree eucalypts (which are unlikely to have<br />

more than 15 years of remaining good health <strong>and</strong> vigour) not be replaced <strong>and</strong> allow the Pin Oaks to become the ‘defacto’ street tree on the<br />

southern verge. The street trees on either verge where not in the original 1921 <strong>plan</strong>tings <strong>and</strong> the evergreen b<strong>and</strong> to the northern street<br />

trees casts winter shade into the <strong>Park</strong>, particularly the dense Eucalyptus cinerea (Argyle Apple) on Henty Street. This is not noticeable on<br />

Greenway Street as the Eucalyptus pauciflora (Snow Gum) have proven relatively unsuccessful as they typically do in Canberra. Measures<br />

to increase sun accessibility to increase <strong>Park</strong> use opportunities, particularly in Winter, is regarded as an important aim within the Master<br />

Plan as certainly the finding of a shady option is never an issue in <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. (Boden 2000 rightfully points out that Option (c) will mean<br />

that there will be two rows of Pin Oaks for some time which is a change in direction of the heritage citation, although offering more space<br />

<strong>and</strong> less competition for the young Pin Oaks. This would require discussion with the Heritage Council.<br />

(OPTION) (SOUTH ROW)<br />

(NORTH<br />

(OPTION)<br />

ROW)<br />

(DISCUSS<br />

<br />

HERITAGE<br />

COUNCIL)<br />

DRAFT<br />

Boden 2000 also did not favour re<strong>plan</strong>ting Greenway Street with Snow Gums or Henty Street with Argyle Apples if the forward Pin<br />

Oak positions were adopted. If eucalypt street tree re<strong>plan</strong>ting was determined as necessary then the Eucalyptus mannifera option of<br />

Boden for Greenway Street matched the Enviro Links Design selection. In Henty Street the Argyle Apples were advised by Boden despite<br />

their then good condition as likely to result in rising maintenance costs in the next 10-20 years (equates to 2010-2020) – although as still<br />

looking good in 2010 this may be extended. Argyle Apples are nominated in the <strong>ACT</strong> Government DUS Design St<strong>and</strong>ards as not suitable<br />

for road verges as subject to Gum Moth <strong>and</strong> scale <strong>and</strong> not to be <strong>plan</strong>ted within 4m of hydraulic services.<br />

NA<br />

Boden 2000 advised that the long lived Deodar Cedars have already had some reasonable aged class rejuvenation due to the<br />

progressive replacement of missing trees in the 1980’s <strong>and</strong> 1990’s, plus it will be reinforced by the continued added replacements<br />

identified in the 2010 Master Plan.<br />

NA<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 42


GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND ONGOING TREE MANAGEMENT <strong>ACT</strong>IONS:<br />

Boden 2000 identified that the Lombardy Poplars along Sullivans Creek where in decline. Around 20 are surviving in 2010 with 10<br />

removed earlier in the year. Boden identified their l<strong>and</strong>mark feature which is supported as a long term intent. He stated that they do not<br />

have the downstream spread issues of willows – but they since have become a Declared Weed in the <strong>ACT</strong> – so Enviro Links Design<br />

recommend that new <strong>plan</strong>tings should consider other deciduous fastigate forms (tall <strong>and</strong> thin) such as Gingko biloba ‘PNI 2720 Princeton<br />

Sentry’, Quercus robur fastigata <strong>and</strong> Pyrus Capital. The fastigate Pin Oak not favoured as st<strong>and</strong>ard Pin Oaks <strong>and</strong> their autumn colour well<br />

represented in the <strong>Park</strong>.<br />

MARGULES1983TREES<br />

&1987MP BODEN2000<br />

<br />

ENVIROLINKSDESIGN<br />

RECOMMENDED2011<br />

MP<br />

(BUT SPECIES<br />

CHANGE)<br />

CENTENNIALPARK<br />

TREEMP2002(If<br />

assertsasimilar<br />

aproachalbeit<br />

differentspecies/site)<br />

Boden 2000 recommended removal of environmental weeds generally established by bird-borne seed.<br />

<br />

Boden 2000 identified permanent tracks from barbecue <strong>and</strong> other maintenance vehicles creating wear <strong>and</strong><br />

compacting tree roots. Ensure trafficking at a minimum <strong>and</strong> to legitimate uses. Enviro Links Design identifies<br />

significant use by service authorities that may need liaison on self regulation to limit use. The 2010 Master Plan<br />

recommends regrassing many tracks in case some are previous routes that now have limited use <strong>and</strong> may be able to<br />

sustain improved grass cover.<br />

NA<br />

NA<br />

THE LONG TERM FUTURE:<br />

Boden 2000 stated Pinus radiata in Canberra can live to 100-120 years although wide variability (so projected that some of the 1921originals may survive to 2020-2040). Deodar Cedars <strong>and</strong> Roman Cypress can live comfortably to at least<br />

150 years of age (so projected to 2070).<br />

In the long term second phase pine replacements on past performance will be required in say 2045 - 2100 (unless the improved genetic stock extends this). Enviro Links Design still recommend use of a scattered block replacement<br />

strategy 50-80m long (but about half the 1980's block size) but with an earlier more proactive staged intervention so works at nearer to 5 year intervals for each stage (or only 1 or 2 blocks in a year) so less impact at any one time.<br />

Delaying action until trees are in serious decline contributes to the need for a concentrated period of high impact tree removals (nearly 700 No.) as occurred in 1984 -1989. A further 103 No. pines were removed in 1993 leaving only 139<br />

No. mature pines in 2000. A more seamless remove/replace transition in the latter part of this 21 st century should be achievable from recent experiences if tree managers are supported by political & community will – but it requires<br />

acceptance that some not yet poor aged trees need to be removed for the long term good <strong>and</strong> a successful staged rejuvenation. Of course with the pines the staggered 1984-1993 <strong>and</strong> now 2010 <strong>plan</strong>tings; followed by a further more<br />

staggered <strong>plan</strong>ting stages late this century should develop a more diverse age class of pines throughout <strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> that allow longer tree retention <strong>and</strong> less impact replacements to follow with good management in perpetuity. This principle<br />

can be achieved with the other longer lived tree species eg Cedars, Pin Oak <strong>and</strong> Roman Cypress if a similar approach is undertaken with them.<br />

DRAFT<br />

NA:NOTAPPLICABLEREFERENCESITEDINTHECENTENNIALPARKREPORT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 43


Appendix B: Traffic Management<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

DRAFT<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 44


DRAFT<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 45


• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

<br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

• <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

• <br />

<br />

• <br />

<br />

<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 46


DRAFT<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 47


Table 1.3: <strong>Park</strong>ing Restrictions <strong>and</strong> Capacity<br />

Thursday 13 May 2010 Saturday 29 May 2010<br />

<strong>Park</strong>ing Area<br />

No. of Vehicles Utlisation No. of Vehicles Utlisation<br />

1 34 100% 21 62%<br />

2 5 50% 0 0%<br />

3 10 100% 1 10%<br />

4 12 100% 0 0%<br />

5 12 100% 2 17%<br />

6 20 100% 0 0%<br />

7 32 100% 0 0%<br />

8 8 57% 1 7%<br />

9 12 100% 3 25%<br />

10 7 50% 0 0%<br />

11 33 62% 0 0%<br />

12 7 58% 0 0%<br />

TheutilisationoftheparkingspaceswassignificantlyhigherduringtheThursdaysurvey,comparedtotheSaturday<br />

survey.OnThursdayoverhalftheparkingareaswereatcapacity<strong>and</strong>allparkingareaswereatleast50%full.On<br />

Saturdaythehighestutilisationrecordedwas62%,followedby25%.Thisindicatestheparkingdem<strong>and</strong>is<br />

significantlylowerontheweekend.Therewasslightlyhigherparkingdem<strong>and</strong>intheeasternparkingareas,<br />

comparedtothewesternparkingareas.<br />

1.6.2 On-Street <strong>Park</strong>ing<br />

Thereisonstreetparkingalongsomeoftheroadsthatbound<strong>Haig</strong><strong>Park</strong>;theparkingrestrictionsvaryfromstreet<br />

tostreet.EastofNorthbourneAvenue,thepredominantparkingrestrictiononthesideoftheroadadjacentto<strong>Haig</strong><br />

<strong>Park</strong>is‘No<strong>Park</strong>ing’between9:00am<strong>and</strong>11:00amMondaytoFridaywith‘No<strong>Park</strong>ing’ontheoppositesideofthe<br />

road.TothewestofNorthbourneAvenuethereisacombinationof‘No<strong>Park</strong>ing’between9:00am<strong>and</strong>11:00am<br />

MondaytoFriday,‘No<strong>Park</strong>ing’between7:30am<strong>and</strong>6:00pmMondaytoFriday,aswellas2hour<strong>and</strong>3hourparking<br />

between8.30am<strong>and</strong>7:30pm.<br />

<br />

2.1 Recommendations<br />

<br />

<br />

DRAFT<br />

Kerbramps<strong>and</strong>footpathsshouldbeprovidedtoensurethereareadequateconnectionsbetweenthenew<br />

paths<strong>and</strong>theexternalpedestriannetwork.Pedestrianrefugesshouldbeconsideredtoassistpedestrians<br />

wheretherearehighervolumes<strong>and</strong>trafficspeeds,particularlyalongGirrahweenStreet.<br />

Theprovisionofakerb<strong>and</strong>gutterissupportedtoformalisetheextentoftheroadway<strong>and</strong>park.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Theproposedaccesspointsto<strong>and</strong>fromthecarparkattheTennisClubshouldbedesignedinaccordance<br />

withAS2890.1.<br />

Wideningofthefootpathstoaminimumof2.5malongthetrunkcycleroutesissupported.<br />

ConsidertrafficcalmingtreatmentsalongGirrahweenStreet<strong>and</strong>MassonStreettoreducevehiclespeeds.<br />

Noadditionalcarparktothoseexisting.<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 48


REFERENCES<br />

<strong>ACT</strong> Heritage Council 2004 Entry to the <strong>ACT</strong> Heritage register, No. 20063.<br />

Braddon Neighbourhood Plan - A sustainable future for Braddon, Source: <strong>ACT</strong>PLA Web Site - www.actpla.act.gov.au (Accessed<br />

October 2011).<br />

Centennial <strong>Park</strong>l<strong>and</strong>s Tree Master Plan, Source: Centennial <strong>Park</strong>l<strong>and</strong>s Web site - www.centennialparkl<strong>and</strong>s.com.au (Accessed<br />

October 2010).<br />

Eric Marn & Associates (2011), ‘Conservaon Management Plan’.<br />

J. Gray (1997), ‘The Historical <strong>and</strong> Cultural Background of Selected Urban <strong>Park</strong>s in Canberra.<br />

Margules & Associates Pty Ltd. (1987), ‘<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Preliminary Concept Proposals’, prepared for the Naonal Capital<br />

Development Commission.<br />

MARS (October 2008), ‘<strong>ACT</strong> Sportsgrounds, <strong>Park</strong>s, Open Spaces Usage <strong>and</strong> Sasfacon Survey’, <strong>Territory</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong> <strong>Services</strong><br />

R.Boden & Associates (2000), ‘<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Tree Management Plan’, prepared for Canberra Urban <strong>Park</strong>s & Places.<br />

Turner Neighbourhood Plan - A sustainable future for Turner, Source: <strong>ACT</strong>PLA Web Site - www.actpla.act.gov.au (Accessed<br />

October 2011).<br />

Webb Australia (2010), ‘Braddon Commercial Precinct Lighng Master<strong>plan</strong>’ extracted from <strong>ACT</strong> Procurement Soluons (2010)<br />

Braddon Public Realm Improvements Implementaon Plan.<br />

DRAFT<br />

<strong>Haig</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Master Plan 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!