26.09.2014 Views

Tensile Behaviour of Spun Yarns under Static State - Journal of ...

Tensile Behaviour of Spun Yarns under Static State - Journal of ...

Tensile Behaviour of Spun Yarns under Static State - Journal of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a case where the interactions actually reduce system<br />

property and I=0 means that the interaction does not<br />

exist, so that the Eq. (13) degenerates in to the simple<br />

ROM. The expression for I can be expressed as Eq.<br />

(14):<br />

I <br />

4X<br />

50%<br />

X 2<br />

2( X 1 X 2 ) 4[ X 50% 0.5( X 1 )]<br />

4 [ X 50 % x ] 4X<br />

(14)<br />

Where, X 50% is the actual system property X s, when the<br />

W 1 = W 2 = 0.5 and x = 0.5 X 1 + 0.5 X 2 are the<br />

arithmetic mean <strong>of</strong> the property for homogeneous<br />

constituents composed <strong>of</strong> X 1 and X 2 alone. If there are<br />

no interactions <strong>of</strong> the two constituents, there will be<br />

X 50% = x, so that X = 0 and I = 0.<br />

Marom, Fischer, Tuler, and Wagner explained that the<br />

alteration <strong>of</strong> the system’s overall properties caused by<br />

the interaction <strong>of</strong> the different constituents can be<br />

specified by using the concept <strong>of</strong> hybrid effect. One<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> the hybrid effect is given as the deviation<br />

<strong>of</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> hybrid structure from the ROM. A<br />

positive hybrid effect means the synergetic case, and<br />

the actual property is above the ROM prediction, where<br />

as a negative hybrid effect means the property is below<br />

the prediction. Therefore, numerically the value <strong>of</strong> X<br />

can used to indicate the hybrid effect and can be<br />

written from Eq. (14) as:<br />

X X x X 0.5X<br />

0.5 ) (15)<br />

50%<br />

50% ( 1 X 2<br />

The Eq. (13) can be normalized to eliminate the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> twist as follows Eq. (16):<br />

X<br />

sn<br />

X s X 1<br />

I<br />

W1<br />

( 1W1<br />

) W1<br />

(1 W1<br />

) (16)<br />

X X<br />

X<br />

2<br />

2<br />

The more efficient way <strong>of</strong> normalizing the Eq. (13) to<br />

eliminate the effect <strong>of</strong> twist to develop the relationship<br />

between relative tenacity and blend ratio is as follows<br />

Eq. (17):<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

s 1<br />

sn% W1<br />

W<br />

X 50% X 50% X 50%<br />

2<br />

I<br />

( 1<br />

1)<br />

I<br />

( 1W1<br />

)<br />

(17)<br />

X<br />

50%<br />

properties, such as the tensile modulus. The increase in<br />

modulus ratio leads to increase in interaction effect 33 .<br />

Pan, and Postle derived a statistical model for<br />

prediction <strong>of</strong> blended yarn strength. He explained that<br />

the blended yarn strength y is a statistical variable<br />

with a normal distribution function H ( y)<br />

, which can be<br />

expressed as Eq. (18):<br />

1 ( y <br />

)<br />

H ( y ) exp[ <br />

(18)<br />

2<br />

2<br />

y<br />

y<br />

2<br />

y<br />

Where, y is the average strength <strong>of</strong> blended yarn and<br />

2<br />

y<br />

is the variance <strong>of</strong> yarn strength. The distribution<br />

parameters can be calculated, according to the statistical<br />

theory as follows Eq. (19) and Eq. (20).<br />

1<br />

E f 2 <br />

<br />

<br />

1 <br />

1<br />

y <br />

q V <br />

<br />

<br />

1 V2<br />

( l<br />

c1<br />

11)<br />

exp (19)<br />

<br />

E f 1 <br />

1<br />

<br />

<br />

Where,<br />

2<br />

2 2<br />

E f 2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

y q 2 ( c1<br />

11)<br />

E f 1<br />

<br />

V<br />

1 V<br />

<br />

<br />

l<br />

<br />

1 <br />

1<br />

exp<br />

<br />

.(<br />

a 1 N )<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

exp<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

(20)<br />

q<br />

is called the orientation efficiency factor; V 1<br />

& V 2 , fiber volume fractions <strong>of</strong> type 1 & 2; E f1 and E f2<br />

are the tensile modulus <strong>of</strong> type 1 & 2 fibers; is the<br />

fiber length; <br />

1<br />

& 1<br />

are the scale & shape parameter <strong>of</strong><br />

a 1<br />

fibers respectively; , N are the number proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

fiber 1 and total number <strong>of</strong> fibers respectively.<br />

According to the hypothesis on estimating the<br />

maximum range <strong>of</strong> statistical distribution, based on this<br />

normality <strong>of</strong> the strength distribution, there is a 99%<br />

chance that the actual blended yarn strength will fall in<br />

to the range <strong>of</strong> y 3 y . He also quantified the<br />

strength hybrid effect by a new parameter y , which<br />

predicts the deviation <strong>of</strong> the actual yarn strength from<br />

the strength predicted by the Rule <strong>of</strong> Mixture. This can<br />

be expressed as Eq. (21):<br />

l c1<br />

[X 50% include the effect <strong>of</strong> both twist and interactions],<br />

the model indicated good correlation with the practical<br />

observations. The nature and results <strong>of</strong> the interactions<br />

<strong>of</strong> different fiber types are determined by their<br />

<br />

<br />

l<br />

y <br />

<br />

l<br />

c1<br />

f<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

1<br />

(21)<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Engineered Fibers and Fabrics<br />

Volume 5, Issue 1 - 2010<br />

7<br />

http://www.jeffjornal.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!