Tensile Behaviour of Spun Yarns under Static State - Journal of ...
Tensile Behaviour of Spun Yarns under Static State - Journal of ...
Tensile Behaviour of Spun Yarns under Static State - Journal of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a case where the interactions actually reduce system<br />
property and I=0 means that the interaction does not<br />
exist, so that the Eq. (13) degenerates in to the simple<br />
ROM. The expression for I can be expressed as Eq.<br />
(14):<br />
I <br />
4X<br />
50%<br />
X 2<br />
2( X 1 X 2 ) 4[ X 50% 0.5( X 1 )]<br />
4 [ X 50 % x ] 4X<br />
(14)<br />
Where, X 50% is the actual system property X s, when the<br />
W 1 = W 2 = 0.5 and x = 0.5 X 1 + 0.5 X 2 are the<br />
arithmetic mean <strong>of</strong> the property for homogeneous<br />
constituents composed <strong>of</strong> X 1 and X 2 alone. If there are<br />
no interactions <strong>of</strong> the two constituents, there will be<br />
X 50% = x, so that X = 0 and I = 0.<br />
Marom, Fischer, Tuler, and Wagner explained that the<br />
alteration <strong>of</strong> the system’s overall properties caused by<br />
the interaction <strong>of</strong> the different constituents can be<br />
specified by using the concept <strong>of</strong> hybrid effect. One<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> the hybrid effect is given as the deviation<br />
<strong>of</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> hybrid structure from the ROM. A<br />
positive hybrid effect means the synergetic case, and<br />
the actual property is above the ROM prediction, where<br />
as a negative hybrid effect means the property is below<br />
the prediction. Therefore, numerically the value <strong>of</strong> X<br />
can used to indicate the hybrid effect and can be<br />
written from Eq. (14) as:<br />
X X x X 0.5X<br />
0.5 ) (15)<br />
50%<br />
50% ( 1 X 2<br />
The Eq. (13) can be normalized to eliminate the effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> twist as follows Eq. (16):<br />
X<br />
sn<br />
X s X 1<br />
I<br />
W1<br />
( 1W1<br />
) W1<br />
(1 W1<br />
) (16)<br />
X X<br />
X<br />
2<br />
2<br />
The more efficient way <strong>of</strong> normalizing the Eq. (13) to<br />
eliminate the effect <strong>of</strong> twist to develop the relationship<br />
between relative tenacity and blend ratio is as follows<br />
Eq. (17):<br />
X<br />
X<br />
X<br />
s 1<br />
sn% W1<br />
W<br />
X 50% X 50% X 50%<br />
2<br />
I<br />
( 1<br />
1)<br />
I<br />
( 1W1<br />
)<br />
(17)<br />
X<br />
50%<br />
properties, such as the tensile modulus. The increase in<br />
modulus ratio leads to increase in interaction effect 33 .<br />
Pan, and Postle derived a statistical model for<br />
prediction <strong>of</strong> blended yarn strength. He explained that<br />
the blended yarn strength y is a statistical variable<br />
with a normal distribution function H ( y)<br />
, which can be<br />
expressed as Eq. (18):<br />
1 ( y <br />
)<br />
H ( y ) exp[ <br />
(18)<br />
2<br />
2<br />
y<br />
y<br />
2<br />
y<br />
Where, y is the average strength <strong>of</strong> blended yarn and<br />
2<br />
y<br />
is the variance <strong>of</strong> yarn strength. The distribution<br />
parameters can be calculated, according to the statistical<br />
theory as follows Eq. (19) and Eq. (20).<br />
1<br />
E f 2 <br />
<br />
<br />
1 <br />
1<br />
y <br />
q V <br />
<br />
<br />
1 V2<br />
( l<br />
c1<br />
11)<br />
exp (19)<br />
<br />
E f 1 <br />
1<br />
<br />
<br />
Where,<br />
2<br />
2 2<br />
E f 2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
y q 2 ( c1<br />
11)<br />
E f 1<br />
<br />
V<br />
1 V<br />
<br />
<br />
l<br />
<br />
1 <br />
1<br />
exp<br />
<br />
.(<br />
a 1 N )<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
exp<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
(20)<br />
q<br />
is called the orientation efficiency factor; V 1<br />
& V 2 , fiber volume fractions <strong>of</strong> type 1 & 2; E f1 and E f2<br />
are the tensile modulus <strong>of</strong> type 1 & 2 fibers; is the<br />
fiber length; <br />
1<br />
& 1<br />
are the scale & shape parameter <strong>of</strong><br />
a 1<br />
fibers respectively; , N are the number proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
fiber 1 and total number <strong>of</strong> fibers respectively.<br />
According to the hypothesis on estimating the<br />
maximum range <strong>of</strong> statistical distribution, based on this<br />
normality <strong>of</strong> the strength distribution, there is a 99%<br />
chance that the actual blended yarn strength will fall in<br />
to the range <strong>of</strong> y 3 y . He also quantified the<br />
strength hybrid effect by a new parameter y , which<br />
predicts the deviation <strong>of</strong> the actual yarn strength from<br />
the strength predicted by the Rule <strong>of</strong> Mixture. This can<br />
be expressed as Eq. (21):<br />
l c1<br />
[X 50% include the effect <strong>of</strong> both twist and interactions],<br />
the model indicated good correlation with the practical<br />
observations. The nature and results <strong>of</strong> the interactions<br />
<strong>of</strong> different fiber types are determined by their<br />
<br />
<br />
l<br />
y <br />
<br />
l<br />
c1<br />
f<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
1<br />
(21)<br />
<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Engineered Fibers and Fabrics<br />
Volume 5, Issue 1 - 2010<br />
7<br />
http://www.jeffjornal.org