05.10.2014 Views

WhatBelongsin Your 15-Bean Soup? - NSTA Learning Center

WhatBelongsin Your 15-Bean Soup? - NSTA Learning Center

WhatBelongsin Your 15-Bean Soup? - NSTA Learning Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />

T E A C H I N G S T R A T E G I E S<br />

What Belongs in <strong>Your</strong><br />

<strong>15</strong>-<strong>Bean</strong> <strong>Soup</strong>?<br />

Using the <strong>Learning</strong> Cycle to<br />

Address Misconceptions about<br />

Construction of Taxonomic Keys<br />

by Ann Ross and<br />

Staria Vanderpool<br />

Kidney beans, pinto beans, navy beans, pea beans, lima beans, black<br />

beans, yellow lentils, green lentils, green split peas, cow peas—are<br />

these all “beans”? Students can use seed characteristics to discriminate<br />

between the different kinds of legumes using taxonomic classification<br />

processes of sorting and ranking, followed by construction of taxonomic keys.<br />

Classification involves two different stages in processing information: sorting<br />

or grouping, and ranking. One example is the way we manage twin challenges<br />

of laundry and getting dressed. On the front end, simply transferring laundry<br />

from the dryer to a laundry basket is the fastest way to ensure that we have<br />

clean clothes. It does not, however, reduce the complexity and time it takes to<br />

dress in the morning. The next step is digging through the laundry baskets of<br />

clothing in search of matching socks, unwrinkled tee shirts, or other essential<br />

clothing items. (On average, dressing requires that you locate and coordinate<br />

nine different items.)<br />

An alternative strategy requires more time on the front end of the laundry<br />

process, but reduces the amount of time spent per day. Clean laundry is sorted.<br />

Socks are matched, underwear stacked, tee shirts folded, and jeans placed on<br />

hangers. The final stage involves the classification process of ranking. Socks<br />

and underwear are stored in separate drawers, tee shirts folded and stacked<br />

together, and shirts, jeans, and outerwear hung in the closet. For the morning-challenged<br />

person, getting dressed then requires locating the dresser, the<br />

closet, and the shoe rack rather than tracking down nine individual items.<br />

Many classification lesson plans instruct students to sort items from the<br />

general to the specific. They continue to divide these groups into subgroups,<br />

using a different characteristic each time, until only one specimen remains in<br />

Ann Ross is an assistant professor of teacher education and Staria Vanderpool is an<br />

assistant professor of botany at Arkansas State University in Jonesboro, Arkansas.<br />

Nov/Dec 2004<br />

science scope<br />

23


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />

T E A C H I N G S T R A T E G I E S<br />

each group. Then they are instructed to devise and<br />

test a dichotomous key. This is a standard approach<br />

used in many classrooms. The value of this activity<br />

is indicated by numerous and innovative techniques<br />

for implementing hands-on classification activities<br />

using jelly beans, cars, or potato chips, for example.<br />

Standard classification activities lead to development<br />

of skills such as observing, interpreting variability,<br />

and sorting related objects into groups. However,<br />

biological classification systems utilize two<br />

separate information-processing stages—sorting and<br />

ranking. Construction of keys that allow others to<br />

discriminate the same groups is just one product of<br />

biological taxonomy. The primary product is a classification<br />

scheme that mirrors the biologist’s understanding<br />

of the historical evolutionary relationships<br />

among similar species. Standard classroom<br />

activities that only involve sorting can lead to misconceptions<br />

about biological classification of organisms<br />

because they leap from sorting to naming,<br />

omitting the ranking process.<br />

A second misconception is that keys are derived<br />

from a classification. Keys are logical devices constructed<br />

by experts that allow others to easily identify<br />

unknown objects. A key allows a user to match<br />

an unknown object with its name, which is not a<br />

function of the classification system. A classification<br />

system reflects the degree of relatedness among the<br />

included species.<br />

One approach to teaching concepts and addressing<br />

misconceptions is the <strong>Learning</strong> Cycle. The <strong>Learning</strong><br />

Cycle was introduced in the 1960s as an inquirybased<br />

teaching technique consisting of three stages:<br />

Exploration, Concept Introduction, and Application<br />

(Beisenherz and Dantonio 1996). The Exploration<br />

phase consists of unstructured, hands-on activities<br />

leading to observations and data collection. The<br />

teacher can identify misconceptions by listening carefully<br />

as students explain their observations. In the<br />

Concept Introduction stage, the scientific concept<br />

that explains what students observed in the first stage<br />

is introduced, including appropriate vocabulary. The<br />

teacher may use textbooks or other materials to<br />

present the concept. In the Application phase, students<br />

pursue more focused<br />

activities that reinforce or<br />

extend basic concepts. The<br />

<strong>Learning</strong> Cycle can be used<br />

Explore classification at<br />

www.scilinks.org.<br />

Enter code SS110401.<br />

to address some of the misconceptions<br />

about biological<br />

classification.<br />

FIGURE 1<br />

Secret sort, Exploration phase<br />

Objective<br />

Students will collect and sort materials gathered from their<br />

environment.<br />

Materials (per group of four students)<br />

one shopping bag<br />

two or three 100-cm lengths of yarn<br />

three index cards<br />

newspaper to cover table<br />

small objects collected by students<br />

Procedure<br />

1. Divide students into groups of four and give each group a<br />

shopping bag.<br />

2. Explain to students that you want each group to collect as<br />

many small objects lying on the ground as possible during a<br />

<strong>15</strong>-minute walk in an assigned schoolyard area. The entire<br />

collection should fit inside the shopping bag.<br />

Safety note: Students should be cautioned to avoid<br />

collecting live animals, animal droppings, broken glass,<br />

or sharp objects. If poison ivy, poison oak, or poison<br />

sumac are present in the collection area, students should be<br />

shown which plants to avoid.<br />

3. In the classroom, students spread newspapers over the<br />

desktops, then sort their materials into separate piles, or<br />

categories. They use the yarn to form loops to enclose groups<br />

of items. Loops may be overlapped or objects placed outside<br />

the loops. There is no right or wrong way to sort.<br />

4. Secret sort: Ask each group to think of a word to describe<br />

each category, write it down on an index card, and place the<br />

card face down near the pile (for example: natural vs.<br />

manmade, or living vs. nonliving).<br />

5. Groups then take 10 minutes to move around the room and<br />

guess how other groups sorted their objects.<br />

6. To wrap up the Exploration phase, the teacher organizes a<br />

table on the board with a column for each group. Hypotheses<br />

made about criteria for grouping, as students move around<br />

the room, are listed in rows for each student group. In the last<br />

row, each group’s explanation of their secret sort is given.<br />

7. Closure: The teacher explains that the basis of sorting,<br />

such as the secret sort, is grouping two or more items that<br />

have something in common. This process is fundamental<br />

to classification.<br />

8. Alternative collection options: Students may bring objects from<br />

home, or the class may use materials collected by the teacher.<br />

24 science scope Nov/Dec 2004


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />

T E A C H I N G S T R A T E G I E S<br />

FIGURE 2<br />

Representative key for identification of dry edible beans available commercially.<br />

Many of these are commonly found in <strong>15</strong>-bean soup mix.<br />

1a. Seed shape in side view round; hilum small, inconspicuous ............................................... Lentil (Lens culinaris)<br />

1b. Seed shape in side view flattened; hilum large and conspicuous ......................................................................... 2<br />

2a. Seed half-moon shaped; flattened in side view ..................................................................................................... 3<br />

2b. Seed oval; rounded in side view ............................................................................................................................. 6<br />

3a. Seed coat color solid ....................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

3b. Seed coat variegated, base color splotched with contrasting color ............................................................... 5<br />

4a. Seed large, length 19–25 mm; white ............................................... Large lima bean (Phaseolus lunata)<br />

4b. Seed small, length 12–14 mm; green-white ............................................. Butterbean (Phaseolus lunata)<br />

5a. Seed coat base color white, with purple blotches;<br />

length 19–25 mm .................................................................. Large purple lima bean (Phaseolus lunata)<br />

5b. Seed coat base color brown, with dark brown blotches;<br />

length 12–<strong>15</strong> mm ................................................................... Small brown lima bean (Phaseolus lunata)<br />

6a. Seed coat color solid .............................................................................................................................................. 7<br />

6b. Seed coat variegated, base color splotched with contrasting color .................................................................... 10<br />

7a. Seed coat color white ............................................................................................................................................. 8<br />

7b. Seed coat other colors ........................................................................................................................................... 9<br />

8a. Seed kidney shaped; length 14–17 mm ........................................ Great Northern bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

8b. Seed oval; length 7.5–11.5 mm ............................................................ Navy soup bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

9a. Seed coat dark red; length 10–13 mm ............................................ Red soup bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

9b. Seed coat black; length 8–11.5 mm ............................................. Black turtle bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

10a. Seed coat base color white; reddish brown spot, restricted to region of hilum;<br />

length 14–18 mm ............................................................................................... Soldier bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

10b. Seed coat base color not white; spots various..................................................................................................... 11<br />

11a. Base color dark brown; speckles tan, uniformly scattered across bean; length 12–14 mm;<br />

seed coat shiny; shape slender and elongated ................................. Brown pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

11b. Base coat tan; variegations other colors, sizes, or distribution .................................................................... 12<br />

12a. Variation pattern with streaks and speckles of purple/reddish purple ......... Cranberry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

12b. Variation pattern speckled only; brown speckles; seed coat dull;<br />

shape rounded, chunky ......................................................................... Common pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)<br />

Exploration<br />

In middle school science, students are introduced to the<br />

concept of classification and the use of taxonomic keys.<br />

One method of teaching classification is through the use<br />

of the <strong>Learning</strong> Cycle. In the first or introductory phase,<br />

Exploration, groups will use prior knowledge and observation<br />

skills to sort materials collected during a walk around<br />

the school yard, or that they or the teacher bring from<br />

home. The “Secret Sort” game is used to explore differing<br />

concepts of relatedness. This activity is adapted from “Session<br />

1: Natural Collecting and Sorting” from the GEMS<br />

book Investigating Artifacts (Barrett et al. 1992). Instructions<br />

for this activity are given in Figure 1.<br />

Concept introduction<br />

During the second phase of the <strong>Learning</strong> Cycle, students<br />

are introduced to concepts of sorting and ranking as part<br />

of the process of classification. This phase will take two to<br />

three class periods. The teacher relates the preceding lesson<br />

to concepts of classification used by scientists. Through<br />

Nov/Dec 2004<br />

science scope<br />

25


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />

T E A C H I N G S T R A T E G I E S<br />

various instructional methods, the<br />

teacher explains that similarities<br />

among biological groups result from<br />

their evolutionary history and can be<br />

understood by looking at similar and<br />

dissimilar features of the organism.<br />

The classification system is a standard<br />

way to summarize current understanding<br />

of relationships among<br />

organisms. Each final category represents<br />

a species.<br />

For people, one of the most familiar<br />

products of classification<br />

processes is a taxonomic key that<br />

allows them to identify a particular<br />

species. As such, keys are derived<br />

from classification systems<br />

following the processes of sorting<br />

and ranking. A good key allows the<br />

user to identify unknown representatives<br />

of a specific group. Figure 2<br />

shows an example of a dichotomous<br />

key devised by the authors for identification<br />

of dry beans readily available<br />

in supermarkets.<br />

Dichotomous keys consist of a<br />

series of paired statements (couplets).<br />

Each statement allows the<br />

user to divide a group into two<br />

FIGURE 3<br />

groups with contrasting features. Successive sets of<br />

couplets allow the user to continue to separate items<br />

in the group, until each separate object has been<br />

placed in a unique category and named. Features to<br />

evaluate when selecting, or preparing a key, include<br />

the following:<br />

• The key should focus on a defined region or group, for<br />

example, “plants on campus,” or “frogs of Ohio.”<br />

• It should be easy to follow, with indented or nested couplets.<br />

• Each couplet should cleanly divide the group of items<br />

into two distinct subgroups.<br />

• Each successive set of couplets should then further subdivide<br />

a subgroup into two distinct subgroups—until<br />

eventually all the included items have been named.<br />

• Empty couplets that do not serve to subdivide the pool<br />

into two groups should not be included.<br />

• Keys should be minimalist (minimum number of couplets,<br />

characters, etc.) and short in style BUT they should also<br />

be detailed and specific enough to be clear. Construction<br />

of a useful key is a balance between excessive information<br />

and adequate information.<br />

Instructions for student key construction,<br />

Application phase<br />

Objective<br />

Students will be able to group and rank paper fasteners as a basis for<br />

constructing their own taxonomic keys.<br />

Materials (per group of four students)<br />

• assorted paper fasteners: various sizes, colors, materials, designs, etc. of<br />

paper clips, push pins, thumbtacks, bulldog clips, staples, butterfly clips, brads,<br />

and so on<br />

• small plastic box to contain the fasteners<br />

• ruler<br />

• two or three 100-cm lengths of yarn<br />

Procedure<br />

1. Each group of students will receive a box of assorted paper fasteners.<br />

2. Instruct the students to separate the fasteners and determine how many<br />

different types they have (different species).<br />

3. Students then place fasteners that are most similar to each other side by<br />

side (different genera).<br />

4. Students continue to group together similar objects until they have placed<br />

all objects into one large group (kingdom of paper fasteners).<br />

5. Students may find it helpful to use loops of yarn to contain their groups.<br />

6. Using the rules for key construction, groups will then construct a written key<br />

that would allow other groups of students to identify their species.<br />

7. Groups can then exchange keys and test their usefulness.<br />

Following explanation of concepts of classification and<br />

key construction and use, students use the key in Figure 2 to<br />

identify beans from a “<strong>15</strong>-bean soup mix” or a mixture of<br />

beans provided by the teacher. Students will use the process<br />

skills of observation, measuring, comparing and contrasting,<br />

and inferring as they examine and identify beans in their<br />

sample and learn how to use the key.<br />

Application<br />

In the application stage of the <strong>Learning</strong> Cycle students will<br />

use their experience with dichotomous keys to test concepts<br />

of biological classification by sorting, ranking, and writing<br />

dichotomous keys for a group of related objects used to hold<br />

papers together (Figure 3). Relatedness among the objects<br />

varies based on the way they perform their function. This<br />

allows the student groups to sort and rank based on degree<br />

of relatedness among the materials. Features students may<br />

use for classification include shape, color, material, mode of<br />

action, or relative size.<br />

Each group of students is given a mixed group of objects<br />

commonly used to hold papers together. The number of items<br />

available for this activity is extensive, inexpensive, and avail-<br />

26 science scope Nov/Dec 2004


○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○<br />

T E A C H I N G S T R A T E G I E S<br />

FIGURE 4<br />

FIGURE 5<br />

Rubric for evaluating taxonomic keys<br />

Able to identify items using the key<br />

Key moves from general to specific<br />

Couplets are indented or there is space between couplets<br />

Quantitative, consistent measurements, not small, large<br />

Precede with noun, followed by verb<br />

Begin choices with same character<br />

Begin couplet with different words<br />

Couplets appropriate in length<br />

Appropriate number of couplets<br />

Use of appropriate vocabulary<br />

Example of a key constructed<br />

by students using communities<br />

of paper fasteners<br />

Comments on the key resulted from peer evaluation by<br />

other student groups.<br />

to enclose related groups—for example,<br />

one loop of yarn could be used to enclose<br />

each “species group,” with a second, larger<br />

Yes No loop enclosing all species included in a<br />

single genus. Once students have sorted<br />

and ranked their groups, they should develop<br />

a classification scheme that reflects<br />

the relative degree of relationship among<br />

the objects.<br />

Once student groups have sorted<br />

their paper fasteners, ranked them, and<br />

developed a classification system, then<br />

they can write a dichotomous key that<br />

would allow other people to identify species<br />

in their paper fastener community.<br />

Evaluation of the keys may be done by<br />

the teacher using a rubric such as that<br />

shown in Figure 4. Alternatively, students<br />

can exchange dichotomous keys and utilize peer evaluation<br />

in a review and revision cycle prior to evaluation by<br />

the instructor. Figure 5 shows peer review comments from<br />

such a review and revision cycle, and indicates an extension<br />

of this classroom activity into standard taxonomic names<br />

assigned to the various paper fasteners.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The application of the <strong>Learning</strong> Cycle process to taxonomic<br />

principles, hierarchical classification, and construction of<br />

keys presents the components of classification that include<br />

sorting (grouping) and ranking as separate stages in classification.<br />

In addition, it separates production and use of keys<br />

from the classification process and presents it as a useful product<br />

of classification. Students frequently use keys to identify<br />

trees, insects, wildflowers, minerals, or rocks. Understanding<br />

concepts behind the classification process and production<br />

of taxonomic keys will enable the students to select<br />

appropriate keys for their region. A suggested extension is<br />

for the student to find a key from a source such as the<br />

Internet, libraries, bookstores, or state agencies to share with<br />

other students in the class. ■<br />

able from any office supply source. Students are instructed to<br />

sort their paper fasteners into groups equivalent to species,<br />

then rank groups into higher taxonomic categories (genus,<br />

family, etc.). To aid in ranking, they may use yarn loops again<br />

References<br />

Barrett, K., et al. 1992. GEMS: Investigating artifacts. Berkeley, CA:<br />

Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California at Berkeley.<br />

Beisenherz, P. and M. Dantonio. 1996. Using the learning cycle to<br />

teach physical science. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.<br />

Berlin, B., D. E. Breedlove, and P. H. Raven. 1973. General principles<br />

of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American<br />

Anthropologist 75: 214–42.<br />

National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National Science Education<br />

Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.<br />

Stuessy, T. F. 1990. Plant taxonomy. New York, N.Y.: Columbia<br />

University Press.<br />

Nov/Dec 2004<br />

science scope<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!