FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION - UNEP World Conservation ...

46
ANNEX 3
Name
FLR ANALYTICAL LOGICAL FRAMEWORK
Date
Type/belonging to or made by who
Key beneficiaries
Parameter
1) Is it directly or indirectly related to
forest regeneration
2) Landscape approach: Is there
reference to the importance / relevance of a
landscape perspective?
3) Forest Functions: Does it support the
idea of restoring forest functionality
4) If so, which forest functions does it
support the restoration of
5) Forest Function Tradeoffs level: Does
it support making forest function trade-offs
at the landscape level
6) Two filters: Does it acknowledge the
role of forest functions in support of human
well-being?
7) Devolving decision-making: Does it
support devolving key decision-making to
the local level
8) Consensus building: Is there flexibility
for negotiations aimed at building
consensus about forest restoration
9) Strategic partnership: Does it support /
encourage the development of strategic
partnerships for more effective
environment management
10) Halting pressure: Does it attempt to
halt pressure that reduces functionality (or
could it be making matters worse)?
11) Innovation :Does it support or
encourage new ideas/approaches (or is it
rigid and prescriptive)
12) Multi-sectoral: Does it provide strong
links to other sectoral goals and strategies –
which ones
Key opportunities
(Please use additional sheets if there are
more things to add – expand upon in these
2 areas.)
Key constraints
Key
++ = very supportive
+ = quite supportive
0 = neutral
- =quite prohibitive/not supporting FLR