22.10.2014 Views

Pain Relief in Labor: A Long and Winding Road

Pain Relief in Labor: A Long and Winding Road

Pain Relief in Labor: A Long and Winding Road

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Relief</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Labor</strong>:<br />

A <strong>Long</strong> <strong>and</strong> W<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>Road</strong><br />

Christopher Viscomi, MD<br />

Director: Acute <strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>and</strong> Regional Anesthesia<br />

Co-Director: OB Anesthesia<br />

Goals<br />

• History: From Bibles to Burl<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

• <strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> labor- anatomy <strong>and</strong><br />

physiology<br />

• Non-medical therapies<br />

• Intravenous therapies<br />

• Sp<strong>in</strong>als <strong>and</strong> epidurals<br />

• Comparative studies<br />

• Answers to frequent questions<br />

• Orig<strong>in</strong>al S<strong>in</strong><br />

Garden of Eden<br />

• God punished Eve: “In sorrow thou<br />

shalt br<strong>in</strong>g forth children.” –Genesis<br />

3:16<br />

• Formed the basis of 1800 years of<br />

opposition to pa<strong>in</strong> relief <strong>in</strong> labor.<br />

• 1591: Lady Euframe MacAlyane of<br />

Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh, Scotl<strong>and</strong>: Burned at the<br />

Stake for ask<strong>in</strong>g for labor analgesia.<br />

1847: Sir James Young Simpson<br />

• Professor of Midwifery,<br />

U. of Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh<br />

• Queen’s Physician <strong>in</strong><br />

Scotl<strong>and</strong><br />

• Considered one of the<br />

world’s foremost<br />

obstetricians<br />

• Discovered anesthetic<br />

properties of<br />

chloroform<br />

Simpson: OB Anesthesiologist<br />

• January 19, 1847- Ether<br />

• November 8, 1847-Chloroform<br />

• Labeled a heretic by the religious<br />

community.<br />

• Criticized <strong>in</strong> the medical community<br />

1


“In sorrow thou shalt br<strong>in</strong>g forth<br />

children” –Genesis 3:16<br />

• Simpson argued persuasively that<br />

“sorrow” was improperly translated.<br />

It was more properly “labor”, “toil”,<br />

or “physical exertion”.<br />

• Noted that God had permitted Adam<br />

to sleep when the rib was harvested<br />

to create women. Thus, clearly<br />

anesthesia was div<strong>in</strong>ely acceptable.<br />

Medical Opposition:<br />

Dr. Charles Meigs<br />

• American obstetrician of equal stature to<br />

Simpson.<br />

• Prom<strong>in</strong>ent New Engl<strong>and</strong> family.<br />

Descendents of Revolutionary War heroes,<br />

first governor of Ohio, <strong>and</strong> founder of the<br />

University of Georgia<br />

• “uter<strong>in</strong>e pa<strong>in</strong> is <strong>in</strong>separable from<br />

contractions. Any pa<strong>in</strong> relief dim<strong>in</strong>ishes<br />

contractions.”<br />

• “Pregnancy <strong>and</strong> labor are normal, <strong>and</strong><br />

should not be <strong>in</strong>terfered with powerful<br />

prescriptive drugs.”<br />

Meigs vs. Simpson<br />

• Simpson” “All pa<strong>in</strong><br />

is without<br />

physiologic value.<br />

It often degrades<br />

or destroys those<br />

who experience it.”<br />

• “it will be<br />

necessary to def<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the precise effect<br />

of ether on uter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

muscles.”<br />

1853: John Snow <strong>and</strong> Queen<br />

Victoria<br />

Snow <strong>and</strong> the London Cholera<br />

Epidemic: The Broad Street<br />

Pumphouse<br />

John Snow<br />

• Compatriot of James Simpson<br />

• Best know as the physician who solved the<br />

London Cholera epidemic<br />

• Cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>and</strong> research <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong><br />

anesthesia, particularly chloroform.<br />

• 4000 anesthetics from 1847-53, with only<br />

one death.<br />

• Secretly called to Buck<strong>in</strong>gham Palace by<br />

Queen Victoria for her delivery of Pr<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

Leopold<br />

2


The Fallout<br />

William Benson, Archbishop of<br />

Canterbury<br />

• The Lancet, Editor <strong>and</strong> Chief: “I<br />

cannot imag<strong>in</strong>e anyone could have<br />

advised the adm<strong>in</strong>istration of<br />

chloroform to her majesty dur<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

natural labor.”<br />

• The Royal Court denied the event for<br />

4 years until the birth of Pr<strong>in</strong>cess<br />

Beatrice <strong>in</strong> 1857. Chloroform was<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istered by Dr. Snow.<br />

Religious Acceptance<br />

1847 <strong>in</strong> America<br />

• 1855 Queen’s acceptance of “that<br />

blessed chloroform” for childbirth.<br />

• Archbishop of Canterbury's (leader of<br />

the Anglican/Episcopal Church)<br />

daughter receives chloroform for<br />

labor pa<strong>in</strong>s. He refuses to criticize<br />

her.<br />

Henry Wadsworth <strong>Long</strong>fellow<br />

• Famous poet <strong>and</strong> scholar.<br />

• His wife, Fanny Appleton <strong>Long</strong>fellow<br />

expect<strong>in</strong>g third child. She described her<br />

first two deliveries “excruciat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

suffer<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

• Henry went to Dr. Nathan Keep, a Dean of<br />

Medic<strong>in</strong>e at Harvard, <strong>and</strong> developer of an<br />

etherization device.<br />

• Fanny’s “suffer<strong>in</strong>gs were greatly<br />

mitigated” “with no unpleasant<br />

symptoms”, “healthy girl”<br />

Fanny <strong>Long</strong>fellow<br />

• “I am sorry many thought me rash <strong>in</strong><br />

try<strong>in</strong>g the ether. I had heard such a<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g had succeeded abroad, where<br />

doctors apply this bless<strong>in</strong>g more<br />

boldly than our timid American ones.<br />

I feel proud to be a pioneer for less<br />

suffer<strong>in</strong>g for womank<strong>in</strong>d.”<br />

• “Gratitude, however, cannot be<br />

bestowed on those men who quarrel<br />

if this is a gift of God.”<br />

3


Mesmerism<br />

• “I have the idea of magnetiz<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

pregnant woman before delivery.<br />

Imag<strong>in</strong>e such a discovery as birth<br />

without pa<strong>in</strong>! Unfortunately Genesis<br />

doesn’t want this.” Dr. Grubert,<br />

Lyons, France, 1836<br />

• 1844, English Mesmerist JP Lynell<br />

provided a week of mesmerism<br />

culm<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> pa<strong>in</strong>less delivery.<br />

Mesmerism <strong>in</strong> America<br />

• Dr. William Fahnestock (Lancaster, PA)<br />

practiced “somnambulism”, which was<br />

similar to “animal magnetism” <strong>and</strong><br />

“mesmerism”, produc<strong>in</strong>g a “stuporous<br />

trance.”<br />

• Reported two deliveries managed without<br />

pa<strong>in</strong>. Mrs. Susan Herr had lost her<br />

eyesight <strong>and</strong> use of her legs with a<br />

previous pa<strong>in</strong>ful delivery. Sight, mobility,<br />

<strong>and</strong> pa<strong>in</strong>less labor were all obta<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />

“somnambulistic trance” dur<strong>in</strong>g her next<br />

delivery.<br />

Mesmerism vs. Ether<br />

• Mesmerists attempted hypnotic states for<br />

surgery, but were generally unsuccessful.<br />

• Famous British surgeon Sir Robert Liston<br />

proclaimed “This Yankee dodge (ether),<br />

gentlemen, beats mesmerism hollow!”<br />

• Never-the-less, for the last 160 years,<br />

hypnotic states have successfully achieved<br />

labor pa<strong>in</strong> relief.<br />

Dr. August Bier<br />

• University of Berl<strong>in</strong>, 1898<br />

• P<strong>in</strong>nacle of Western Medic<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />

1890s<br />

• He <strong>and</strong> an assistant (Dr. Henselbach)<br />

hammered sp<strong>in</strong>al needles <strong>in</strong>to each<br />

other backs, <strong>in</strong>jected coca<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

• Reported first sp<strong>in</strong>al anesthetic, first<br />

sp<strong>in</strong>al headaches.<br />

Description of Sp<strong>in</strong>al Anesthesia<br />

• “I ext<strong>in</strong>guished my cigar on<br />

Henselbach’s knee- it was sensed<br />

only as warmth.”<br />

• “I struck his sh<strong>in</strong> with an anvil, but<br />

no pa<strong>in</strong> was noted.”<br />

• “His testicle was placed <strong>in</strong> a surgical<br />

clamp. This evoked sweat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

some nausea, but no pa<strong>in</strong>.”<br />

4


Bier Footnotes<br />

• 1944: Mrs. Bier makes remark at<br />

Berl<strong>in</strong> cocktail party<br />

• Next day: both disappear. Mrs. Bier<br />

dies <strong>in</strong> prison 1945<br />

• Dr. Bier discovered confused, near<br />

starvation at <strong>in</strong>sane asylum, 1946<br />

1900: Sp<strong>in</strong>al anesthesia <strong>in</strong><br />

obstetrics<br />

• Dr. Oskar Kreis, University of Munich<br />

• First to use sp<strong>in</strong>al anesthesia for<br />

childbirth.<br />

• Technique generally used only for<br />

desperate surgical deliveries because<br />

of high rates of <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>and</strong> other<br />

complications.<br />

The poppy seed<br />

Opium<br />

• Available s<strong>in</strong>ce the Romans<br />

• Crude extracts from poppy seeds<br />

produced mixtures of morph<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

code<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>and</strong> opium<br />

• Taken orally, smok<strong>in</strong>g, or by<br />

smear<strong>in</strong>g seed paste on sk<strong>in</strong> followed<br />

by multiple puncture with a small<br />

knife.<br />

Syr<strong>in</strong>ge + Better chemistry =<br />

“Twilight sleep”<br />

• 1899: Von Ste<strong>in</strong>buchel’s <strong>and</strong> Gauss<br />

• Described comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g morph<strong>in</strong>e with<br />

a plant extract (scopolam<strong>in</strong>e).<br />

• Amnesia was prom<strong>in</strong>ent, <strong>and</strong><br />

considered desirable.<br />

• Patient dem<strong>and</strong> exceeded physician<br />

endorsement, with most physicians<br />

oppos<strong>in</strong>g the practice.<br />

5


World War I<br />

• Great <strong>in</strong>term<strong>in</strong>gl<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

European <strong>and</strong><br />

American Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• Post- war, obstetrics<br />

grew <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

scientifically advanced<br />

specialty<br />

• Effects of anesthesia<br />

on the newborn<br />

scientifically<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />

Dr. Paul Zweifel,<br />

Demonstrated the presence of<br />

chloroform <strong>in</strong> newborn blood<br />

<strong>and</strong> ur<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Twilight Sleep<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Apgar, MD<br />

• Caution urged: The Freiburg method<br />

of Dammerschlaf or twilight sleep.<br />

Am J. Obstet Gynecology, 1914<br />

• First reports of newborns breath<strong>in</strong>g<br />

slowly or not at all after mothers<br />

received “twilight sleep”.<br />

Apgar Score<br />

1950-70s: Contrast<strong>in</strong>g movements<br />

• First attempt to quantify<br />

effects of labor <strong>and</strong><br />

medications on the birth<br />

condition of the neonate.<br />

• Important to have person<br />

other than obstetrician or<br />

midwife do the score.<br />

• Allowed comparisons of<br />

pa<strong>in</strong> relief techniques:<br />

Sp<strong>in</strong>al anesthesia had<br />

better scores compared to<br />

general anesthesia.<br />

Grantly Dick-<br />

Read, MD<br />

Caudal-Epidural Injection<br />

6


Grantly Dick-Read: Natural<br />

Childbirth <strong>and</strong> Prenatal Education<br />

• English Gynecologist<br />

• Rejected the need for pa<strong>in</strong> reliev<strong>in</strong>g drugs<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g childbirth: pa<strong>in</strong> was pr<strong>in</strong>cipally a<br />

product of preconceived fear <strong>and</strong> tension (<br />

he called it the 'fear-tension-pa<strong>in</strong>'<br />

syndrome). He believed that women who<br />

were properly prepared could control labor<br />

pa<strong>in</strong> themselves - without hav<strong>in</strong>g to resort<br />

to medication. In order to achieve this, he<br />

stressed the importance of education,<br />

exercise <strong>and</strong> relaxation.<br />

PART II: The Anatomy <strong>and</strong><br />

Physiology of <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

• Discrete nerve pathways for labor<br />

pa<strong>in</strong>.<br />

• Separate nerve fibers transmit pa<strong>in</strong><br />

form the uterus <strong>and</strong> from the vag<strong>in</strong>a.<br />

First Stage of <strong>Labor</strong><br />

• Onset of<br />

contractions until<br />

cervix fully dilated.<br />

• Uter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

contractions<br />

sensed <strong>in</strong> abdomen<br />

<strong>and</strong> back<br />

• Nerve fibers go<br />

from uterus to the<br />

sp<strong>in</strong>al cord (T10-<br />

L1).<br />

Second Stage of <strong>Labor</strong><br />

• Baby beg<strong>in</strong>s to<br />

descend <strong>in</strong>to<br />

vag<strong>in</strong>a<br />

• Distention of<br />

vag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> rectal<br />

pressure<br />

transmitted via<br />

paired “pudendal<br />

nerves” <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

sp<strong>in</strong>al column <strong>in</strong><br />

the scrum.<br />

Transmission of <strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> Signals<br />

From sensory nerve<br />

To Dorsal horn of<br />

Sp<strong>in</strong>al Cord<br />

To Sp<strong>in</strong>othalamic Track<br />

To Bra<strong>in</strong>stem<br />

To Thalamus<br />

To Cerebral cortex<br />

(conscious pa<strong>in</strong><br />

experience)<br />

7


Sp<strong>in</strong>al Cord<br />

<strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> Control Options<br />

• First Stage of<br />

<strong>Labor</strong>:<br />

• Paracervical nerve<br />

block (rare)<br />

• Epidural/sp<strong>in</strong>al<br />

(common)<br />

• Narcotics<br />

• Non-pharmaco.<br />

(hypnosis, massage,<br />

breath<strong>in</strong>g techniques)<br />

• Second stage of<br />

labor:<br />

• Pudendal nerve<br />

block<br />

• Epidural/sp<strong>in</strong>al<br />

• Non-pharmacologic<br />

Pudendal <strong>and</strong> paracervical blocks<br />

Epidural<br />

Pudendal Nerve Block<br />

Paracervical Nerve block<br />

Part III: “Non-Medical Therapies”<br />

• Hypnosis- best studied<br />

• Education<br />

• Massage<br />

• Breath<strong>in</strong>g techniques<br />

• Water<br />

• Walk<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Hypnosis<br />

• Multiple theories of how it works,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g altered neuro-transmitters,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased natural narcotics<br />

(endorph<strong>in</strong>s), suppression of<br />

excitatory neurons.<br />

• Evidence is that it works well as an<br />

adjunct dur<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong>ful surgical<br />

procedures.<br />

• Evidence is that it works well dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

labor.<br />

8


Hypnosis as adjunct to m<strong>in</strong>or<br />

surgery<br />

Hypnosis for <strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Relief</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Labor</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Childbirth: a Systematic<br />

Review<br />

• Br. J. Anaesth, 2004<br />

• 5 R<strong>and</strong>omized Cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

Trials, 3 of good quality<br />

• Results of these three<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed: “Metaanalysis”<br />

• Need for pa<strong>in</strong> relief<br />

drugs<br />

• Self rat<strong>in</strong>g of pa<strong>in</strong><br />

Hypnosis: Systematic review<br />

Hypnosis:<br />

Advantages/Disadvantages<br />

• 50% decrease <strong>in</strong> women request<strong>in</strong>g<br />

other analgesics<br />

• Of those choos<strong>in</strong>g narcotic <strong>in</strong>jection,<br />

they received less than non-hypnosis<br />

patients<br />

• Hypnosis patients rated their pa<strong>in</strong> as<br />

less severe compared to control<br />

patients<br />

• PROS:<br />

• No drugs<br />

• No allergic<br />

reactions<br />

• No needles<br />

• No placental drug<br />

transfer<br />

• Potential costsav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

• Limitations<br />

• Patient<br />

commitment<br />

• Preparation:<br />

typically at least 6<br />

sessions<br />

• Hypnotist available<br />

• Substantial number<br />

still go on to<br />

receive IV drugs or<br />

epidural<br />

Education<br />

• Grantly Dick-Read stressed prenatal<br />

education as a key to less pa<strong>in</strong><br />

• Less fear=less pa<strong>in</strong><br />

• Scientific evidence is lack<strong>in</strong>g: no<br />

r<strong>and</strong>omized cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials.<br />

• Non-r<strong>and</strong>omized studies: lower pa<strong>in</strong><br />

scores <strong>and</strong> less analgesics if prenatal<br />

classes attended.<br />

Massage, Counter-pressure<br />

• No r<strong>and</strong>omized, placebo-controlled<br />

scientific study<br />

• No harm likely.<br />

• May have benefit<br />

9


• No prospective<br />

r<strong>and</strong>omized trial.<br />

• Multiple<br />

retrospective<br />

endorsements<br />

• Some controversy<br />

about low <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

Apgar scores with<br />

underwater births.<br />

Water birth<br />

• 2000+ years of use<br />

• Very simple to give:<br />

<strong>in</strong>travenous,<br />

<strong>in</strong>tramuscular, oral,<br />

through sk<strong>in</strong><br />

• Onset of effect rapid<br />

• Can be repeated as<br />

necessary<br />

• Can still get an<br />

epidural later<br />

Narcotics<br />

Downsides of narcotics<br />

• Limited pa<strong>in</strong> relief<br />

• Maternal sedation <strong>and</strong> nausea,<br />

neonatal effects<br />

• Predictor of need to “resuscitate” the<br />

newborn: Quadruples need<br />

• Reversal drug-naloxone+breath<strong>in</strong>g<br />

assistance. No difference by 6<br />

hours.<br />

My bias<br />

• Use narcotics very early <strong>in</strong> labor as a<br />

sleep aid.<br />

• “I just need a little help at the peaks<br />

of contractions, <strong>and</strong> a bit of rest <strong>in</strong>between<br />

contractions.”<br />

• Not for serious pa<strong>in</strong> relief, or those<br />

want<strong>in</strong>g a clear-headed recollection<br />

of labor.<br />

Epidural <strong>Labor</strong> Analgesia<br />

• I am an<br />

anesthesiologist.<br />

• The culture of<br />

above.<br />

• My pay does not<br />

change if you do or<br />

do not get an<br />

epidural dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

your labor.<br />

Epidural <strong>Labor</strong> Analgesia<br />

• Pros:<br />

• The gold st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

for pa<strong>in</strong> relief <strong>in</strong><br />

labor.<br />

• Alert mom<br />

• Compared to<br />

narcotics, greatly<br />

reduced newborn<br />

resuscitation rates.<br />

• Very high<br />

satisfaction<br />

• Cons:<br />

• Prolongs labor 1 hour<br />

• 15 more m<strong>in</strong>utes of<br />

push<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• 1% risk of headache<br />

• 1:23,000 risk of nerve<br />

<strong>in</strong>jury<br />

• Walk<strong>in</strong>g restricted<br />

• ?Bladder catheterized<br />

10


What do epidurals do to natural<br />

labor?<br />

• Very difficult to ethically exam<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

• It is unethical to r<strong>and</strong>omize women<br />

who want pa<strong>in</strong> relief to an epidural<br />

vs. a placebo.<br />

• Severe labor pa<strong>in</strong> predicts long labor<br />

<strong>and</strong> high chance of Cesarean<br />

delivery.<br />

• Large selection bias <strong>in</strong> observational<br />

studies<br />

Selection Bias<br />

• The undo<strong>in</strong>g of many research<br />

studies.<br />

• Observational <strong>and</strong> retrospective<br />

studies always have selection bias.<br />

• Prospective, R<strong>and</strong>omized, Placebo-<br />

Controlled, Double-Bl<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is best.<br />

The Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Significance of <strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Cognitive Activity <strong>in</strong> Latent <strong>Labor</strong><br />

• Wuitchik M, Bakal D, <strong>and</strong> Lipshitz J.<br />

Obstetrics <strong>and</strong> Gynecology 1989<br />

• 115 women, low risk, first<br />

pregnancy, <strong>in</strong> spontaneous labor<br />

• Psychological scor<strong>in</strong>g test for pa<strong>in</strong><br />

given dur<strong>in</strong>g latent phase of labor.<br />

• <strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> scores categorized as<br />

“discomfort<strong>in</strong>g”, “distress<strong>in</strong>g”, <strong>and</strong><br />

“horrible/excruciat<strong>in</strong>g”<br />

Wuitchik, et al.<br />

• Epidurals not available<br />

• Completely observational study<br />

• Related pa<strong>in</strong> assessment <strong>in</strong> latent<br />

phase (early labor, cervical dilation<br />

< 5 cm) with duration of labor <strong>and</strong><br />

mode of delivery<br />

<strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> Duration<br />

Phase Discomfort<strong>in</strong>g Distress<strong>in</strong>g Horrible/<br />

excruciat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Latent 391 585 866<br />

Active 230 382 574<br />

Total 1 st<br />

Stage (m<strong>in</strong>)<br />

621 967 1440<br />

11


<strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Intensity<br />

<strong>Pa<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> Outcome<br />

Spontaneous Forceps Cesarean<br />

Discomfort<strong>in</strong>g 70.4% 29.6% 0.0%<br />

Distress<strong>in</strong>g 53.6% 39.3% 7.1%<br />

Horrible<br />

Excruciat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

31.6% 42.1% 26.3%<br />

Had epidurals been available…<br />

• The “horrible/excruciat<strong>in</strong>g” group<br />

was head<strong>in</strong>g for a long labor <strong>and</strong><br />

high chance of Cesarean delivery.<br />

• The Horrible/excruciat<strong>in</strong>g group<br />

would very likely have requested<br />

epidurals <strong>in</strong> great numbers <strong>in</strong> early<br />

labor.<br />

• If this had happened, then epidurals<br />

would have been blamed for long<br />

labors, C/S.<br />

Narcotics Vs. Epidural<br />

JAMA, 1998, Meta-analysis<br />

• All RCTs of epidural vs. narcotics <strong>in</strong> labor<br />

• Better pa<strong>in</strong> relief with epidural<br />

• Higher patient satisfaction with epidural<br />

• No change <strong>in</strong> Cesarean delivery rate.<br />

• 4x higher newborn resuscitation with<br />

narcotic<br />

• 1 hour longer total labor <strong>in</strong> 1 st pregnancy<br />

• More maternal fevers with epidural.<br />

• More “assisted” deliveries with epidural.<br />

When is “too early” to get an<br />

epidural?<br />

• What we know:<br />

• 3 RCTs<br />

• Women contract<strong>in</strong>g<br />

regularly, cervix<br />

dilat<strong>in</strong>g, > 2 cm<br />

• No advantage found <strong>in</strong><br />

wait<strong>in</strong>g until later <strong>in</strong><br />

labor for the epidural.<br />

• That is, if you are sure<br />

you want an epidural.<br />

When is too late?<br />

• No evidence-based response.<br />

• My experience with patients almost<br />

or completely dilated: 50%-50%<br />

• Can a person cooperate with the<br />

procedure?<br />

• Often a s<strong>in</strong>gle sp<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>jection is<br />

chosen.<br />

• Be well educated.<br />

• Listen to your<br />

body.<br />

• Be flexible <strong>in</strong> your<br />

plans.<br />

• Only get as much<br />

as you need.<br />

Part<strong>in</strong>g words<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!