CV - University of New Mexico

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PAPERS 15. “Kant and Newton on the A Priori Necessity of Geometry.” Forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 14. “Observation and Mathematics.” In The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century (Oxford University Press, 2013), edited by Peter Anstey, pp. 144-168. 13. “Mediating Between Past and Present: Descartes, Newton, and Contemporary Structural Realism.” In Philosophy and Its History: New Essays on the Methods and Aims of Research in the History of Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2013), edited by Mogens Laerke, Justin E. H. Smith, and Eric Schliesser, pp. 278-300. 12. “Newton and Proclus: Geometry, Imagination, and Knowing Space.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy (September 2012) 50/3: 389-413. 11. “Newton and Newtonianism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy (September 2012) 50/3: 363-69. 10. “Locke’s Qualified Embrace of Newton’s Principia.” In Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays (Cambridge University Press, 2012), edited by Andrew Janiak and Eric Schliesser, pp. 48-68. 9. “Descartes’ Mathematics.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Winter 2011 edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = . 8. “Kant on the Imagination and Geometrical Certainty.” Perspectives on Science (Dec 2010), 18/4: 409- 431. 7. (with Michael Dickson) “Discourse on a New Method, Or a Manifesto for a Synthetic Approach to History and Philosophy of Science.” In Discourse on a New Method (Open Court, 2010), edited by Mary Domski and Michael Dickson, pp. 1-20. 6. “Newton as Historically-Minded Philosopher.” In Discourse on a New Method (Open Court, 2010), edited by Mary Domski and Michael Dickson, pp. 65-89. 5. “Newton’s Empiricism and Metaphysics.” Philosophy Compass (July 2010) 5/7: 525-534. 4. “The Intelligibility of Motion and Construction: Descartes’ Early Mathematics and Metaphysics, 1619-1637.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (2009) 40: 119-130. 3. “The Transcendental and the Geometrical: Kant’s argument for the Infinity of Space.” Law and Peace in Kant’s Philosophy: Proceedings of the Tenth International Kant Congress (Walter de Gruyter, 2008), Vol 2: 149-160. 2. “Construction without Spatial Constraints: A Reply to Emily Carson.” Locke Studies: An Annual Journal of Locke Research (2006) 6: 85-99. 1. “The Constructible and Intelligible in Newton’s Philosophy of Geometry.” Philosophy of Science (2003) 70 (5): 1114-1124. Domski 2
WORK IN PROGRESS 4. “Physics” (co-authored with Peter Machamer) for The Descartes Lexicon (Cambridge University Press), edited by Larry Nolan. 3. “Newton’s Mathematics and Empiricism” for The Oxford Handbook of Newton, edited by Eric Schliesser and Chris Smeenk. 2. “Deducing and Inducing from the Phenomena: A Fresh Look at the Philosophy of Science in Newton’s General Scholium” for a volume marking the 300 th anniversary of the General Scholium, edited by Stephen Snobelen. 1. Manuscript provisionally titled Descartes and Newton on Mathematics, Metaphysics and Method. Focuses on the interplay of mathematics, metaphysics, and natural philosophy in Descartes’ and Newton’s works and aims to shed light on their struggles to offer a metaphysics and a method for natural philosophy that are appropriate to their mathematical views of nature. REVIEWS 9. Essay Review of Steffen Ducheyne’s The Main Business of Natural Philosophy: Isaac Newton’s Natural- Philosophical Methodology (2012) and William Harper’s Isaac Newton’s Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology (2011). Forthcoming (fall 2013) in HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society of History of Philosophy of Science. 8. Review of Peter Machamer and J.E. McGuire, Descartes’s Changing Mind (Princeton University Press, 2009). HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society of History of Philosophy of Science (spring 2011) 1(1): 162-165. 7. Review of Niccolò Guicciardini, Isaac Newton on Mathematical Certainty and Method (The MIT Press, 2009). Canadian Journal of History (Winter 2010) 45: 614-617. 6. Review of D. Garber and B. Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns (Princeton University Press, 2008). Mind (April 2010), 119 (474): 478-481. 5. Review of Andrew Janiak, Newton as Philosopher (Cambridge University Press, 2008). Early Science and Medicine (2009) 14: 590-592. 4. “Evolving maths”: Review of Peter S. Rudman, How Mathematics Happened: The First 50,000 Years (Prometheus Books, 2007). Endeavour (2008) 32: 39-41. 3. Review of Michael Ben-Chaim, Experimental Philosophy and the Birth of Empirical Science: Boyle, Locke, Newton (Ashgate Publishing, 2004). Early Science and Medicine (2006) 11 (1): 122-126. 2. Review of J. Buchwald and I. Bernard Cohen (eds.), Isaac Newton’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: MIT Press, March 2004, Paperback edition). Physics in Perspective (2005) 7 (3): 377-380. 1. Review of Lorenzo Magnani, Philosophy and Geometry: Theoretical and Historical Issues (New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001). Philosophy of Science (2004) 71 (3): 412-415. Domski 3
Page 1: Mary A. Domski University of New Me
Page 5 and 6: *11. “Newton, Locke, and the Math
Page 7 and 8: 7. “Reconciling the Historical Co
Page 9 and 10: 5. “The Historical Ancestry of Ka
Page 11 and 12: ) California State University, Fres

CV - University of New Mexico

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?