23.10.2014 Views

Annotated Bibliography Guidelines

Annotated Bibliography Guidelines

Annotated Bibliography Guidelines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bio 202L Fall 2013<br />

<strong>Annotated</strong> <strong>Bibliography</strong> (30 pts.)<br />

Due in your discussion class, Week 14 (Nov 18-22, 2013)<br />

**NOT FOLLOWING THESE GUIDELINES WILL COST YOU POINTS!!**<br />

Your bibliography topic is due to your TA by your lab of Week 7, (Sept 30-Oct 4, 2013). Turn<br />

in a typed sheet to your TA including your narrowed down topic and a 3-5 sentence paragraph about<br />

why the genetics topic you have chosen interests you. Make sure to include two properly cited<br />

journal articles and their abstracts that you plan on discussing in your paper. For proper journal<br />

citation refer to Appendix D in your lab manual – this can also be downloaded from the lab web site<br />

under “Writing Scientific Papers.” If you have not turned in a topic by Friday, Oct 4, 4pm your<br />

TA will assign one to you. Once your topic is approved by your TA, you may NOT change it<br />

(Topic changes will result in loss of points).<br />

• DO NOT plagiarize or cheat!!<br />

• Do not use the same topic as your current genetics presentation!!<br />

• Do not wait until the night before to begin your report!!<br />

o If you need help, go to the Reference Desk in the Centennial Library<br />

• Refer to A Short Guide to Writing about Biology, 7 th Edition, Pechenik (packaged with<br />

the Biology 201/202 Lab Manual) – reference page numbers will appear throughout these<br />

guidelines in the following format: SGWB pg. X<br />

Pick any topic in Genetics. For that topic, identify three (3) papers from the primary scientific<br />

literature. The assignment is to read these papers and present an annotated bibliography for each,<br />

followed by a summary.<br />

We have three goals in this writing assignment: (1) to insure that you are introduced to some basic<br />

concept in genetics at a more substantial level than that introduced in lecture, (2) that you are<br />

introduced (if you are not already) to the curious style in which scientists converse with one another<br />

professionally, and (3) that you are forced to write in a clear and concise manner following a<br />

standardized format.<br />

<strong>Guidelines</strong> for the <strong>Annotated</strong> <strong>Bibliography</strong><br />

1) Number of papers. Each student will submit an annotation for three (3) papers from the primary<br />

scientific literature (i.e., three separate annotations). At least 2 of the 3 papers MUST be<br />

published within the last five years.<br />

2) Subject area. All three papers should address a single topic in Genetics. The choice of the topic<br />

and the scientific papers is up to you; pick a topic (e.g., genetic diseases, genomics, DNA<br />

replication, control of protein synthesis, genetics of the immune response, etc.) that appeals to<br />

you. The papers must be peer-reviewed scientific literature!! If you are not sure if a journal is<br />

peer-reviewed, check with your TA or with a librarian!!<br />

Discuss the topic with the TA before you begin. If you are finding the choice difficult, the TA<br />

can suggest a chapter in the textbook to help you pick the topic.<br />

1


Bio 202L Fall 2013<br />

3) Sources of papers. No more than two papers may be from the same author or the same journal.<br />

DO NOT USE chapters from textbooks, review or summary articles, books, popular magazines<br />

or internet sites (unless they are from an on-line scientific journal). The papers must come from<br />

the primary scientific literature. If you have questions about primary scientific literature, contact<br />

your TA or talk to a librarian. (http://elibrary.unm.edu/csel/) (SGWB pg. 21-35)<br />

NOTE: Review articles are articles that review a concept or technique; they do not describe an<br />

experiment performed by the author(s). Review articles will often provide you with excellent<br />

background information and are a good starting point for learning more about your chosen topic,<br />

but because they do not contain descriptions of original research by the author(s), they are not<br />

appropriate for this assignment.<br />

4) Contents of each annotation (max. 250 words each, without citation). For each paper, include the<br />

following:<br />

A. Full list of authors, full title and journal citation (year, journal name, volume, page numbers;<br />

you MUST follow the citation style used in your Lab Manual Appendix D: Literature Cited<br />

and/or “Writing Scientific Papers” – this can be downloaded from the lab web site). (SGWB<br />

pg. 71-81).<br />

• The article citations should not be included in the word count.<br />

B. Two or three sentences about why the author(s) did the study. This should include the main<br />

problem that identifies the general puzzle the paper attempts to solve (i.e., the broader<br />

relevance; note that sometimes the authors themselves may not even do this very well!). The<br />

goal here is to construct the opening sentences so the reader wants to read the rest of the<br />

annotation.<br />

C. Two to four sentences of background information required to understand the study's<br />

significance.<br />

D. Three to five sentences about the primary methods (NO LISTS!!) and results of the study.<br />

E. Two to three sentences summarizing the general conclusions of the study, including the<br />

answer to the question stated at the beginning.<br />

5) Summary of all 3 annotations (250 words max.). After the third annotation, include a two part<br />

summary that includes:<br />

A. Overall conclusion - an overview of the combined results of all three studies indicating why<br />

the general issue they address is important; this could include one or more key questions that<br />

remain to be answered (approx. 125 words).<br />

B. Your personal interest - what you personally thought was most interesting about the issue(s)<br />

addressed by the three papers (approx. 125 words).<br />

Both your 'overall conclusion' and your 'personal interests' should be well reasoned and carefully<br />

argued. The key to a carefully argued overall conclusion and a compelling statement of personal<br />

interest lies in a careful choice of the subject area and articles to be annotated.<br />

2


Bio 202L Fall 2013<br />

6) Writing style. Refer to your lab manual Appendix C: Abstracts and <strong>Annotated</strong> Bibliographies<br />

and/or “Writing Scientific Papers” – this can be downloaded from the lab web site. The<br />

annotated bibliography should be written in your own words for a non-scientific audience (i.e., as<br />

if for a short note for the Science section of a newspaper, or if you were trying to explain it to<br />

your grandparents in a letter). Explain technical terms and acronyms in plain English if<br />

necessary. Make sure your paper is spellchecked and grammatically correct before turning it in.<br />

To avoid accusations of plagiarism, do not simply reword the author’s original words (i.e. no<br />

direct quotes!). Set aside the paper and restate the material entirely in your own words. (SGWB<br />

pg. 42-43)<br />

7) Length limit. Two (2) pages maximum; 12 pt. “Times” font, single spaced with 1” margins, one<br />

side of a page only.<br />

8) Word count. You must include a word count (use your word-processor!) at the end of each<br />

annotation and at the end of the summary section. Marks will be deducted if the word limits are<br />

exceeded.<br />

9) Final format. The final document should consist of three pages:<br />

Page 1: Cover page that includes: your name, your TA’s name, your discussion section number,<br />

the date, and the title of your topic.<br />

Page 2: Annotations #1 and #2.<br />

Page 3: Annotation #3 and overall summary.<br />

10) Photocopies of original abstracts & introduction. Submit with your report a photocopy of the<br />

abstract and the first page of the introduction (not the entire paper) for each of the 3 papers you<br />

used for your annotated bibliographies (you will lose points if these are not submitted).<br />

11) Recommended Grading Rubric (30 pts. total):<br />

ANNOTATED BIBIOGRAPHY MUST BE: (Automatic loss of 5pts if either not met)<br />

______ Over a topic in genetics<br />

______ Different from current genetics presentation topic<br />

EACH ANNOTATION (8pt. ea.):<br />

______Paper Comprehension<br />

a. A clear statement of the puzzle to be solved ____________<br />

b. Adequate background to understand the significance of the study ____________<br />

c. Summary of main methods and results ____________<br />

d. Summary of the main conclusions of the paper, including solution to the<br />

'puzzle' stated at the beginning<br />

____________<br />

______Followed format<br />

a. Correct citation format ____________<br />

b. Article is primary literature ____________<br />

c. Stayed within word count limit ____________<br />

d. Attached Abstract ____________<br />

e. Spelling and Grammar ____________<br />

SUMMARY (6pt.):<br />

______A concise summary of the overall conclusion from all three annotations<br />

______A clear statement of your own interests<br />

______Spelling and Grammar<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!