23.10.2014 Views

Regularity near the characteristic boundary for sub-laplacian operators

Regularity near the characteristic boundary for sub-laplacian operators

Regularity near the characteristic boundary for sub-laplacian operators

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

364 DIMITER VASSILEV<br />

Lastly, in [Garofalo and Vassilev 2000] it was required that <strong>the</strong> domain be uni<strong>for</strong>mly<br />

star-like <strong>near</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>characteristic</strong> <strong>boundary</strong>, which is unnecessary, as we will<br />

show.<br />

2. Preliminaries and notation<br />

We introduce <strong>the</strong> relevant definitions and state some results which will be needed<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sequel. Consider <strong>the</strong> Lie algebra g = ⊕ r j=1 V j of G. We assume that <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

a scalar product on g, with respect to which <strong>the</strong> V j ’s are mutually orthogonal.<br />

Let X = {X 1 ,. . . ,X m } be a basis of V 1 , and continue to denote by X <strong>the</strong> corresponding<br />

system of sections on G. The <strong>sub</strong>-Laplacian associated with X is <strong>the</strong><br />

second-order partial differential operator on G given by<br />

m∑<br />

= − Xj ∗ X j =<br />

j=1<br />

m∑<br />

j=1<br />

X 2 j<br />

(recall that Xj ∗ = −X j in a Carnot group; see [Folland 1975]). From <strong>the</strong> assumption<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Lie algebra, one immediately sees that <strong>the</strong> system X satisfies <strong>the</strong> well-known<br />

finite-rank condition, and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e that <strong>the</strong> operator is hypoelliptic, thanks to<br />

Hörmander’s <strong>the</strong>orem [1967]. However, it fails to be elliptic, and <strong>the</strong> loss of regularity<br />

is measured by <strong>the</strong> step r of <strong>the</strong> stratification of g. For a function u on G, set<br />

( m∑<br />

|Xu| = (X j u) 2) 1/2<br />

.<br />

j=1<br />

For 1 ≤ p < Q, define ˚1,p (G) as <strong>the</strong> closure of C0 ∞ (G) with respect to <strong>the</strong> norm<br />

(∫<br />

1/p<br />

(2-1) ‖u‖ ˚1,p (G) = |Xu| p d H)<br />

.<br />

G<br />

We define <strong>the</strong> Sobolev exponent relative to p as <strong>the</strong> number p ∗ = pQ/(Q − p),<br />

where Q is <strong>the</strong> homogeneous dimension defined below. The relevance of such a<br />

number is emphasized by <strong>the</strong> Folland–Stein inequality (1-1).<br />

In any Carnot group, <strong>the</strong> exponential mapping exp : g → G is an analytic diffeomorphism.<br />

We use it to define analytic maps ξ i : G → V i , i = 1, . . . , r, through <strong>the</strong><br />

equation g = exp ξ(g), where ξ(g) = ξ 1 (g) + · · · + ξ r (g). With m = dim(V 1 ), <strong>the</strong><br />

coordinates of ξ’s projection in <strong>the</strong> basis X 1 ,. . . ,X m will be denoted by x 1 =x 1 (g),<br />

. . . , x m =x m (g), that is,<br />

(2-2) x j (g) = 〈ξ(g), X j 〉, j = 1, . . . , m.<br />

We set x = x(g) = (x 1 , . . . , x m ) ∈ m . Later we will need to exploit <strong>the</strong> properties<br />

of <strong>the</strong> exponential coordinates in <strong>the</strong> second layer of <strong>the</strong> stratification of g. We

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!