Seminar Evaluation Form - College of Pharmacy - Idaho State ...

Style-Handout
Handout poorly organized and/or outlined; insufficient
1 data are provided to audience; references
inappropriately done; sloppy job
Handout incomplete; organization needs improvement;
2 all pertinent references not included or inappropriately
formatted
Handout relatively complete and organized; most
3
pertinent references cited and formatted correctly
Handout clearly organized; easy to follow; thorough
4 review of topic with all appropriate references cited
correctly
Comments
3. Summary and Conclusions
Presenter summarizes data inaccurately and conclusions
1
are discordant with regard to presented material
Minimal data summary; some conclusions appropriate
2
with regard to presentation content
Adequate data summary; most conclusions accurate
3
with regard to presented material
Data summarized accurately and conclusions concordant
4
with regard to presented material
Comments
Content-Body of Seminar
Extremely cursory review of subject; data (i.e.,
1
pathophysiology, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics,
2
pharmacotherapy) presented are not interpreted
3
correctly by presenter
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Review of subject not complete; significant
inaccuracies in data
Review of subject relatively complete; minor
inaccuracies in data are presented
Extremely thorough review of subject; data (i.e.
pathophysiology, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics,
pharmacotherapy) presented are interpreted correctly
by presenter
Comments
Content-Literature Review
Primary literature review not included; accurate
1 interpretation of literature not provided; presenter
2 demonstrates no knowledge of research and statistical
methods
3
4
5
6
7
8
Minimal use of primary literature; accuracy of
interpretation of literature questionable; minimal
knowledge of statistical methods and research design
Adequate use of primary literature; most interpretations
of literature are accurate; good understanding of
knowledge of statistical methods and research design
Thorough primary literature review included; accurate
interpretation of literature provided; presenter
demonstrates clear understanding of research and
statistical methods
Comments
4. Questions and Answers
Presenter is defensive and unprepared while answering
1 questions; questions are not repeated for understanding;
answers unorganized and/or contrived
Presenter is uncomfortable and unprepared for some
2 questions; questions are not repeated for understanding;
answers somewhat disorganized
Presenter is relatively comfortable and prepared to
3 answer questions; most questions repeated for
understanding; most answers organized
Presenter is at ease and welcomes questions; well
4 prepared for answers; all questions repeated for
understanding; answers are concise and accurate
Comments
5. Overall Assessment-Content
Presenter did not know this subject well; the
1
presentation did not improve my knowledge base
Presenter did a fair job on the subject, significant
2 deficiencies were apparent; I learned a little from the
presentation
Presenter did a good job on the subject, minor
3 deficiencies were observed; I learned some new
information
Presenter knew this subject from top to bottom; I
4
learned a lot of new information from the presentation
Comments
Total Points ___________________
(≥45 points is passing)
(>54 points is honors)