Seminar Evaluation Form - College of Pharmacy - Idaho State ...

Presenter: Date:
Seminar Evaluation Form
Idaho State University College of Pharmacy
Seminar title: Start time: End Time:
Evaluation for final grade is based on Content and on Style. The content grade is weighted to reflect the importance of this portion of
the evaluation. Please justify ratings in the comments section. Circle and total the appropriate ratings for this presentation.
1. Introduction
Style
Presenter appeared very nervous and ill-prepared;
1
frequent distracting mannerisms
Presenter was somewhat nervous; occasional distracting
2
mannerisms
Beginning anxiety handled well; minor indications of
3
uneasiness
Presenter was entirely at ease and introduced the topic
4
flawlessly
Comments
Content
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
No structure to introduction. Did not provide audience
with an understanding of the topic or why it was of
interest to the presenter; no plan for presentation
provided
Minimal structure to introduction; interest in topic not
well described; plan for presentation provided, but
difficult to follow.
Introduction pertinent and attracted audience’s attention;
presenter provided audience with some view of the
importance of the topic; plan for presentation relatively
clear
Audience provided with a clear understanding of
importance of, and presenter’s interest in, the topic; plan
for presentation well delineated.
Comments
Objectives
1 No objectives provided
Written objectives unclear and not easily measurable or
2
obtainable
Measurable objectives written, but not thoroughly
3
covered in presentation
Measurable objectives written and thoroughly covered
4
in presentation
Comments
2. Body of Presentation
Style-Speech and Attire
Consistently poor voice tone (volume), posture, and/or
mannerisms; frequent errors in pronunciation;
1
inappropriately groomed and attired; presentation was
read; no internal summaries
Voice tone, posture and/or mannerisms poor at times,
infrequent errors in pronunciation; grooming and attire
2
need improvement; presenter reads much of
presentation; minimal internal summaries
Infrequent problems with voice tone posture, and/or
mannerisms; appropriate pronunciation, grooming,
3
and/or attire; presenter reads some of the presentation;
good internal summaries
Excellent voice tone and posture; appropriate
pronunciation, mannerisms, grooming, and attire
4
throughout presentation; presenter spoke freely; internal
summaries enhanced presentation
Comments
Style-Visual Aids
Slides/overheads impossible to read; do not follow or
1 contribute significantly to talk; inappropriate time spent
on each slide/overhead
Some slides/overheads readable, but do not follow talk;
2
time spent on each slide needs improvement
Most slides/overheads readable and generally follow
3 talk; organization and time management needs slight
improvement
All slides/overheads readable, attractive, well-organized
4 and parallel talk; appropriate time spent on each
slide/overhead
Comments

Style-Handout
Handout poorly organized and/or outlined; insufficient
1 data are provided to audience; references
inappropriately done; sloppy job
Handout incomplete; organization needs improvement;
2 all pertinent references not included or inappropriately
formatted
Handout relatively complete and organized; most
3
pertinent references cited and formatted correctly
Handout clearly organized; easy to follow; thorough
4 review of topic with all appropriate references cited
correctly
Comments
3. Summary and Conclusions
Presenter summarizes data inaccurately and conclusions
1
are discordant with regard to presented material
Minimal data summary; some conclusions appropriate
2
with regard to presentation content
Adequate data summary; most conclusions accurate
3
with regard to presented material
Data summarized accurately and conclusions concordant
4
with regard to presented material
Comments
Content-Body of Seminar
Extremely cursory review of subject; data (i.e.,
1
pathophysiology, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics,
2
pharmacotherapy) presented are not interpreted
3
correctly by presenter
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Review of subject not complete; significant
inaccuracies in data
Review of subject relatively complete; minor
inaccuracies in data are presented
Extremely thorough review of subject; data (i.e.
pathophysiology, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics,
pharmacotherapy) presented are interpreted correctly
by presenter
Comments
Content-Literature Review
Primary literature review not included; accurate
1 interpretation of literature not provided; presenter
2 demonstrates no knowledge of research and statistical
methods
3
4
5
6
7
8
Minimal use of primary literature; accuracy of
interpretation of literature questionable; minimal
knowledge of statistical methods and research design
Adequate use of primary literature; most interpretations
of literature are accurate; good understanding of
knowledge of statistical methods and research design
Thorough primary literature review included; accurate
interpretation of literature provided; presenter
demonstrates clear understanding of research and
statistical methods
Comments
4. Questions and Answers
Presenter is defensive and unprepared while answering
1 questions; questions are not repeated for understanding;
answers unorganized and/or contrived
Presenter is uncomfortable and unprepared for some
2 questions; questions are not repeated for understanding;
answers somewhat disorganized
Presenter is relatively comfortable and prepared to
3 answer questions; most questions repeated for
understanding; most answers organized
Presenter is at ease and welcomes questions; well
4 prepared for answers; all questions repeated for
understanding; answers are concise and accurate
Comments
5. Overall Assessment-Content
Presenter did not know this subject well; the
1
presentation did not improve my knowledge base
Presenter did a fair job on the subject, significant
2 deficiencies were apparent; I learned a little from the
presentation
Presenter did a good job on the subject, minor
3 deficiencies were observed; I learned some new
information
Presenter knew this subject from top to bottom; I
4
learned a lot of new information from the presentation
Comments
Total Points ___________________
(≥45 points is passing)
(>54 points is honors)