23.10.2014 Views

SPRING 2011 - Baptist Health South Florida

SPRING 2011 - Baptist Health South Florida

SPRING 2011 - Baptist Health South Florida

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Senior{Focus<br />

CT screening cuts lung cancer deaths<br />

Former or current smokers should take note of a recent study<br />

that found that those who were screened annually with lowdose<br />

spiral CT (computed tomography) scans had a 20 percent<br />

lower risk of dying from lung cancer than those screened<br />

with conventional chest X-rays.<br />

The results of the study were so compelling that the landmark<br />

National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was stopped and the preliminary<br />

results reported.<br />

“These findings are significant since it appears that yearly<br />

screening with low-dose CT imaging can save lives of seemingly<br />

healthy people who have a history of<br />

heavy smoking,” said <strong>Baptist</strong> Hospital<br />

Chief of Radiology Jack Ziffer, M.D., Ph.D.<br />

“Reducing lung cancer mortality by 20<br />

percent will make a huge difference in<br />

sparing patients and their families from<br />

the devastation caused by this disease.”<br />

The National Cancer Institute, sponsor<br />

of the study, estimates that more than<br />

94 million current and former smokers<br />

in the United States are at high risk for<br />

Jack Ziffer, M.D.,Ph.D.<br />

lung cancer. In 2010, an estimated<br />

222,520 people were diagnosed with, and 157,300 died of, cancer<br />

of the lung and bronchus. Cigarette smoking is the most important<br />

risk factor, though lung cancer strikes some nonsmokers.<br />

Chest X-rays have long been used by doctors to look for signs<br />

of lung cancer in those patients with symptoms. But chest X-ray<br />

screening hasn’t reduced lung cancer deaths.<br />

Because CT can pick up much smaller tumors than X-rays, the<br />

newer technology has been proposed as a life-saving screening<br />

tool. Researchers wanted to find out if finding tumors earlier with<br />

CT would increase the odds of surviving lung cancer.<br />

The NLST, launched in 2002, focused on 53,454 former and<br />

current heavy smokers ages 55 to 74. Participants had smoked at<br />

least 30 “pack years” — one pack a day for 30 years, two packs a day<br />

for 15 years, or three packs a day for at least 10 years. Former smokers<br />

were included if they were 30 pack-year smokers who had<br />

Compared to a one-way view of the lungs from the front or side<br />

in a conventional chest X-ray (left), a low-dose CT lung scan gives<br />

cross-sectional images from many different directions that can<br />

be manipulated by radiologists for a more detailed analysis.<br />

stopped smoking within the previous 15 years.<br />

Participants at 33 American sites were randomly assigned to<br />

undergo either annual screening with CT scans or traditional<br />

chest X-rays for three years. After the three rounds of screening,<br />

the participants were to be followed for five years.<br />

There were 354 deaths in the CT group and 442 in the chest<br />

X-ray group. Of those screened with CT, 24 percent had a positive<br />

finding for an abnormality, compared to nearly 7 percent of those<br />

screened with X-ray. Follow-up tests, such as invasive biopsies,<br />

found no signs of cancer in the majority of those people whose CT<br />

or X-ray results indicated a possible abnormality.<br />

“This study only looked at current and past heavy smokers —<br />

those at highest risk for developing lung cancer,” Dr. Ziffer said.<br />

“The results of this trial will be used to develop national screening<br />

guidelines that will weigh the potential for saving lives against the<br />

disadvantages associated with the high rate of false-positive findings,<br />

and concerns for the cumulative effects of radiation from<br />

multiple CT scans — though the dose used for screening is much<br />

less than that used for diagnostic imaging.”<br />

Experts agree that the best way to prevent lung cancer is to never<br />

start smoking, or if already smoking, to quit. If you are concerned<br />

about your risk for lung cancer, talk to your doctor. — Anne Streeter<br />

HOW TO GET A LUNG, HEART SCREENING<br />

If you are at risk for lung disease or a heart attack, you may benefit from one or both of the following CT screening scans:<br />

• CT lung screening scans look for early signs of lung cancer and other abnormalities (see story above).<br />

• CT calcium scoring scans measure the buildup of calcium on the walls of coronary arteries, a sign of heart disease and<br />

potential heart attacks.<br />

Talk to your doctor about the benefits of these tests if you are over age 40; if you have diabetes, high blood pressure or high<br />

cholesterol, or have ever smoked; or if you have a family history of heart disease or lung cancer.<br />

A doctor’s prescription is required to schedule CT scans. If you need a physician, call <strong>Baptist</strong> <strong>Health</strong>’s free Physician Referral<br />

Service at 786-596-6557 in Miami-Dade or 954-837-1200 in Broward. To schedule an appointment, call 786-573-6000 in Miami-<br />

Dade or 954-837-1000 in Broward.<br />

The cost of a CT calcium scoring scan is $120; $250 for CT lung screening. If both tests are done on the same day, the total<br />

cost is $295. Insurance does not typically cover the cost of these tests.<br />

10 RESOURCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!