25.10.2014 Views

Academic Bowl Study Guide Preface

Academic Bowl Study Guide Preface

Academic Bowl Study Guide Preface

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2012–13 ACADEMIC BOWL | 2<br />

<strong>Preface</strong>: A Swiftly Texting<br />

Planet<br />

Resolved: that Hermione gets good grades because she doesn’t<br />

waste time on the Internet. The Wizarding World has a lot going for<br />

it: flying brooms, Quidditch, a rousing soundtrack. But it doesn’t<br />

have telephones, or computers, or machine guns. When Voldermort<br />

rises, no one in the Ministry of Magic suggests taking him out with an<br />

unmanned drone.<br />

Why not? Certainly, the Wizarding World understands product innovation.<br />

Harry Potter lusts after a new Firebolt broom, and some bright inventor was behind the Knight Bus.<br />

But the Wizarding World is marked more by the absence of cell phones than by the introduction of<br />

quad-feather magic wands.<br />

Fans of Harry Potter have debated this issue for years.<br />

Where are the Muggle technologies? Some theorize that<br />

magic makes devices like the smartphone and the light<br />

bulb malfunction 1 . Others see it differently: they argue<br />

that, thanks to magic, people just don’t need them in<br />

their lives.<br />

“Rowling left out technology so the<br />

magic could breathe.”<br />

- Anonymous Blogger<br />

Quidditch players do need broomsticks, and they demand<br />

new-and-improved models so they can win games more<br />

easily. Wizards don’t need phones because they have owls,<br />

and they don’t need guns because they have the cruciatus<br />

curse.<br />

The real world presents similar questions. Does technology<br />

lurch forward of its own accord, stopping only when it<br />

doesn’t work—like the zeppelin, which went down with the<br />

Hindenburg? Or is the path of invention shaped by what<br />

people are already looking for in their lives?<br />

Future generations will remember 2011 as the year when the<br />

revolution was tweeted. Protests across the Middle East were<br />

sparked by social networking. Rioters in London used BBM 2<br />

to coordinate acts of vandalism. Governments proved they<br />

could play, too: China moved to pre-crush its own so-called<br />

“Jasmine Revolution” by blocking online searches of the<br />

word jasmine 3 , while San Francisco police tried to squelch<br />

their own protesters by shutting down cell phone service in<br />

subway tunnels.<br />

Did the creators of Twitter intend for it to help unseat dictators? No. Did people embrace it because<br />

it could? Perhaps, although it is more likely they just wanted a better way to follow the Kardashians.<br />

1<br />

Imagine what it would do to hotel room keycards.<br />

2<br />

The text messaging service on the soon-to-be-defunct Blackberry platform.<br />

3<br />

To the detriment of tea lovers everywhere.


2012–13 ACADEMIC BOWL | 3<br />

Mark Zuckerberg devised Facebook because people already wanted to know more about their friends<br />

and classmates 4 . Facebook was a compelling new solution to an old problem. When Steve Jobs<br />

announced the iPad in 2010, many analysts went “meh.” People, they said, didn’t need tablets—they<br />

already had phones and laptops. Yet in two years Apple has sold over 60 million 5 .<br />

In recent years researchers have probed the tangled<br />

relationship between the tools we create, the world we live<br />

in, and the people we become. These scholars of science,<br />

technology, and society go beyond empty generalizations—<br />

“The Internet changed everything!” They pose deeper<br />

questions. Why did the wheel, so popular in Asia and the<br />

Middle East, never take off 6 in the early Americas? 7 Does<br />

growing up in front of a computer affect the way a person<br />

views the world? How is it possible that, in the year 2012 8 ,<br />

no one is commuting to school by jetpack or sharing<br />

adventures with a wisecracking robot pal?<br />

Addressing these questions means taking a closer look at<br />

who shapes the inventions we use and at the conditions that help bring them about. It means<br />

examining the technologies that have transformed our world and asking how much each was a<br />

response to social changes and how much it contributed to those changes. It also means looking at<br />

certain inventions we were told would revolutionize our lives—the Segway! Smell-O-Vision!<br />

Microsoft Bob!—and figuring out why they never did.<br />

4<br />

Or stalk them.<br />

5<br />

Meh, indeed.<br />

6<br />

Or roll off, technically.<br />

7<br />

As opposed to the 1970s Scottish folk/rock band Stealers Wheel, which never caught on anywhere.<br />

8<br />

Eleven years since the Space Odyssey! We’ve got some catching up to do.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!