TOP - September 2005 - APS Member Groups - Australian ...
TOP - September 2005 - APS Member Groups - Australian ...
TOP - September 2005 - APS Member Groups - Australian ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 2. Factors Typically<br />
Measured by Integrity Tests<br />
Do integrity tests really work?<br />
The bottom line is whether integrity tests<br />
can effectively predict theft and other<br />
counterproductive work behaviours. The<br />
answer is a resounding ʻyesʼ. Integrity<br />
tests have been under the scrutiny of<br />
academic research for the past two decades,<br />
resulting in hundreds of published<br />
articles and conclusive results. Ones and<br />
Viswesvaran (1998) assert that integrity<br />
tests are perhaps the most researched<br />
scales in the occupational literature. The<br />
wealth of data points to the effectiveness<br />
of such testing.<br />
Four large-scale, meta-analytic studies<br />
(OʼBannon, Goldinger, & Appelby, 1989;<br />
Ones, Viswesvaran, & Schmidt 1993;<br />
Ones, Viswesvaran, & Schmidt, 2003;<br />
Sackett et al., 1989) reviewed hundreds<br />
of pieces of published empirical research<br />
and concluded that integrity tests have<br />
substantial generalisable validities. Figure-<br />
3 summarises the behaviours found to be<br />
strongly predicted by these tests.<br />
Figure 3. Factors Predicted by<br />
Integrity Tests<br />
While the main aim of integrity tests is to<br />
predict counterproductive work behaviours,<br />
research has found them also to be<br />
excellent predictors of job performance,<br />
more so than any other form of broad personality<br />
assessment (Ones & Viswesvaran,<br />
1998). In Australia, it is a common practice<br />
for recruitment companies to use tests<br />
measuring broad personality dimensions<br />
(e.g., 16PF, NEO PI) hoping that these<br />
will predict an individualʼs future job performance.<br />
But whilst personality measures<br />
undoubtedly assist the recruiter in understanding<br />
the broader characteristics of the<br />
job incumbent, research has not substantiated<br />
a strong relationship between<br />
broad personality dimensions and job<br />
performance (see Organ & Ryan, 1995 and<br />
Borman et al., 2001 for major reviews).<br />
However, Ones and Viswesvaran (2001),<br />
after comparing the predictive validities<br />
of some of the commonly used personality<br />
measures with the predictive validities of<br />
integrity tests found integrity tests to be<br />
superior in predicting job performance.<br />
Integrity Tests - Applications<br />
The use of integrity tests is not limited to<br />
specific business sectors or occupations;<br />
ʻintegrityʼ is almost a prerequisite for any<br />
new employee. Having said that, there are<br />
a number of industries that treat the integrity<br />
test as an integral part of their screening<br />
procedure for all new employees.<br />
Integrity tests are most commonly used<br />
when recruiting for entry-level positions<br />
that involve the direct handling of and<br />
responsibility for money and merchandise.<br />
Financial institutions, retail chains, supermarkets,<br />
hospitality and fast-food chains<br />
are good examples (and big consumers) of<br />
the sorts of organisations who extensively<br />
use integrity assessments.<br />
However, the main niche for the use of<br />
integrity tests is in the recruitment of<br />
employees to ʻsensitiveʼ positions where<br />
such testing is combined with industrial<br />
security background checks. These<br />
include, for example, the testing of casino<br />
personnel, bank employees and security<br />
personnel.<br />
A ʻbest practiceʼ recruitment strategy for<br />
more senior positions (e.g., professionals<br />
and middle to senior management) is<br />
to obtain a broad perspective on the job<br />
incumbent. Therefore, the inclusion of<br />
integrity tests within a larger assessment<br />
battery (e.g., together with mental ability<br />
and broad personality evaluations) is<br />
recommended. Integrity tests can then be<br />
used as an additional source of information<br />
to be considered during the recruitment<br />
interview.<br />
Shopping for an Integrity Test?<br />
Page 10.<br />
There are a number of key factors an<br />
organisation should consider when deciding<br />
on the sort of integrity test to adopt.<br />
Niehoff and Paul (2000) suggested that<br />
care must be taken in order to select tests<br />
that have been carefully validated, as there<br />
are many integrity tests, but few have rigorous<br />
reliability and validity. In addition,<br />
tests differ substantially in their degree of<br />
sophistication; some tests use such measures<br />
as ʻlie scalesʼ, internal consistency<br />
analysis, social desirability scales, and<br />
even a measure that detects hesitations in<br />
responding. As professionals, it is important<br />
for organisational and occupational<br />
psychologists to ask more about the testʼs<br />
validation criteria and the internal mechanisms<br />
used to detect dishonest responses.<br />
When applying integrity tests in this country,<br />
it is important that they are configured<br />
to the <strong>Australian</strong>-English language and<br />
jargon. To date, with the exception of few,<br />
most integrity tests do not offer a version<br />
specifically configured for Australia.<br />
Furthermore, as most integrity tests come<br />
in a computerised form, it is recommended<br />
that the chosen test will have a function<br />
that adapts to the individual literacy level<br />
of the test taker. This quality increases the<br />
accuracy of the test results as it minimises<br />
biases resulting from allowing examineesʼ<br />
too much time to think of the ʻrightʼ<br />
answer.<br />
Another important consideration is the<br />
utility of an internet-based version of the<br />
test, as on-line integrity testing offers<br />
significant advantages. Firstly, it allows<br />
a quick turnaround, which means that<br />
testers or their clients can view the results<br />
immediately after the administration of the<br />
test. Secondly, it requires no downloads,<br />
no implementations and no maintenance<br />
from customers. As such, the internetbased<br />
integrity test can be administered<br />
from anywhere (including remote locations)<br />
at anytime with unlimited locations<br />
being used concurrently, as access to the<br />
test is not limited to the location of the<br />
computer(s) where it has been installed.<br />
Finally, an internet-based version also<br />
means that the price is more cost-effective<br />
because there are no tangible costs such as<br />
printing, data entry, couriers, etc.<br />
A final consideration to take into account<br />
when choosing a test is its track record.<br />
Ask the provider for a list of clientele and<br />
for permission to contact them. It is also<br />
important to ʻfeelʼ the test in a trial run,<br />
ensuring that it is user-friendly and that<br />
the results, reports and narrative make<br />
sense. Figure 4 summarises the requirements<br />
of good integrity tests.