27.10.2014 Views

Winter 2005 - University Photographers' Association of America

Winter 2005 - University Photographers' Association of America

Winter 2005 - University Photographers' Association of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BITS & CHIPS<br />

anyone else the pictures <strong>of</strong> our feet<br />

or the ceiling, just that we keep them.<br />

Right now<br />

JPEG and TIFF seem to be the<br />

most common formats that everyone<br />

can open and I guess we just have<br />

to hope that someone keeps that old<br />

copy <strong>of</strong> Photoshop 3 running on a<br />

computer somewhere so the person<br />

that is still working from your old<br />

Eisenhower era desk can open your<br />

campus photos in the year 2067.<br />

What about archiving RAW<br />

files? The general thinking seems<br />

to be that we should keep the<br />

original camera files but if we shoot<br />

RAW format we should also archive<br />

a set in TIFF or JPEG format also. I<br />

am glad that DVDs are under a buck<br />

each now (www.rima.com), as a<br />

Shakespeare In The Park<br />

production that I just shot in RAW<br />

format was 9.7 GB <strong>of</strong> data once I<br />

converted it to TIFF files.<br />

Where do we store the data?<br />

A folder on our desktop is mighty<br />

handy but I have yet to find a hard<br />

drive that wasn't looking for a<br />

reason to loose my files. The<br />

Technical Advisory Service for<br />

Images in the UK has done quite a<br />

bit <strong>of</strong> research (see, not all<br />

government grant money is wasted).<br />

You can get the results <strong>of</strong> the TASI<br />

study at www.tasi.ac.uk/ In short,<br />

use high quality, gold discs, make<br />

two copies <strong>of</strong> everything and plan<br />

to copy everything over to new<br />

media every 5 years.<br />

Making two copies does not do<br />

much good if we put them both in<br />

the same desk drawer so we should<br />

really have a system that keeps at<br />

least one set in a fire vault,<br />

preferable somewhere <strong>of</strong>f site.<br />

And while we are at it, throw<br />

out the Sharpie markers, the stick<br />

on labels and even the inkjet<br />

printable discs. The solvents in the<br />

markers and labels have already<br />

been shown to have long term<br />

etching effects on the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

disc. To be considered archival<br />

don't mark the disc at all or confine<br />

yourself to a fine point Sharpie on<br />

the clear inner ring <strong>of</strong> the disc.<br />

At my shop we keep one copy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the original files on our server's<br />

hard drives because it is so handy<br />

and a second copy on a gold DVD<br />

in a fire safe. This seems to be about<br />

the midpoint from what I heard at<br />

the Symposium. After considering<br />

the risks and the costs I have<br />

decided that a good work-study<br />

student job will be making a second<br />

set <strong>of</strong> verified discs that I can store<br />

<strong>of</strong>f campus.<br />

One issue where there seemed<br />

to be little consensus was delivering<br />

the files for publication or other<br />

uses. Most <strong>of</strong> us seem to want to<br />

release only corrected files that are<br />

tuned for the intended use but many<br />

also said that time and insistent<br />

customers sometimes prevailed.<br />

Some university photographers are<br />

in a position that allows them very<br />

close control <strong>of</strong> the files while many<br />

<strong>of</strong> us have less control and some<br />

have situations where the designers<br />

just dig through the hard drive and<br />

pick whatever they want. It looks<br />

like this part <strong>of</strong> digital workflow is<br />

still a long way from being settled<br />

on many campuses.<br />

Do you have a portable USB<br />

drive for transferring batches <strong>of</strong> files<br />

or making important backups? As<br />

handy as that can be there are now<br />

several cheap adapters out there for<br />

transferring data from a digital<br />

camera directly to any USB device<br />

including that USB drive. The<br />

adapters cost about $40 vs the $400<br />

for a Nikon Coolwalker. The<br />

Macally Syncbox is the one that I<br />

drooled over. The various digital<br />

wallets like the Coolwalker do have<br />

other features like a LCD to view<br />

your images but if you have a USB<br />

drive on hand this might save you<br />

some bucks.<br />

If your boss really loves you<br />

then you might try ordering a $300<br />

iPod and the $100 Belkin adapter<br />

that lets you move files from a<br />

Compact Flash card to the iPod. At<br />

least you could listen to your tunes<br />

while you work at your new job<br />

vacuuming the V-Ps <strong>of</strong>fice!<br />

Mark Philbrick/BYU<br />

22<br />

UPAA Contact Sheet

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!