27.10.2014 Views

Equipped for the Future Assessment Report: How Instructors Can ...

Equipped for the Future Assessment Report: How Instructors Can ...

Equipped for the Future Assessment Report: How Instructors Can ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E Q U I P P E D F O R T H E F U T U R E A S S E S S M E N T R E P O R T<br />

In a comprehensive adult learning assessment system,<br />

<strong>the</strong> instructor’s major responsibility in terms of reporting assessment results<br />

is to <strong>the</strong> individual student.<br />

<strong>Report</strong>ing on Student Progress<br />

and Achievement<br />

After scoring responses to student assessment tasks,<br />

<strong>the</strong> next step is to communicate <strong>the</strong> results to <strong>the</strong><br />

appropriate audiences. Broadly speaking, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

two types of in<strong>for</strong>mation provided by student<br />

assessment: <strong>for</strong>mative and summative. Formative<br />

assessment results are typically diagnostic, identifying<br />

student strengths and weaknesses. The instructor<br />

uses <strong>for</strong>mative in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> several purposes:<br />

to identify possible gaps in students’ skills and<br />

knowledge that call <strong>for</strong> redirection of instruction; to<br />

identify specific aspects of a given student’s work<br />

that need improvement; and to determine how to<br />

support <strong>the</strong> student in achieving <strong>the</strong> next level of<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Summative assessment results provide summary<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation of a student’s achievement at a<br />

specific and meaningful point in time (e.g., end of<br />

semester, end of program). Summative in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

can also serve multiple purposes: as an indicator of<br />

overall program quality; to compare student per<strong>for</strong>mances<br />

to established standards; and to assess a student’s<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance in relation to his or her personal<br />

or career goals.<br />

Both <strong>for</strong>mative and summative in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

about student achievement can be reported to individual<br />

students and to <strong>the</strong> larger public (e.g., local<br />

program administration or <strong>the</strong> federal government<br />

<strong>for</strong> program accountability purposes). Students can<br />

use <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation to understand how well <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are progressing and where <strong>the</strong>y may need extra<br />

help. The larger public is likely to use summative<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation to help in<strong>for</strong>m policy and instructional<br />

program changes. For example, if <strong>the</strong> summative<br />

assessment results <strong>for</strong> a particular community indicate<br />

that adult learners are per<strong>for</strong>ming below<br />

expectations on readiness <strong>for</strong> work, interested parties<br />

in that community may push <strong>for</strong> more adult<br />

education programs that focus on related aspects of<br />

skill development.<br />

In a comprehensive adult learning assessment<br />

system, <strong>the</strong> instructor’s major responsibility in terms<br />

of reporting assessment results is to <strong>the</strong> individual<br />

student. <strong>Assessment</strong> results can be reported in several<br />

ways. <strong>Instructors</strong> can provide in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

classroom assessment results through individual<br />

conversations with students, written comments,<br />

grades, and/or scoring checklists or rubrics. <strong>Instructors</strong><br />

can also help individual students interpret and<br />

understand <strong>the</strong> results of assessment reports that<br />

students receive from external agencies (e.g., certification<br />

agencies).<br />

When instructors adopt new <strong>for</strong>ms of assessment,<br />

it is an opportune time to establish a meaningful<br />

system <strong>for</strong> reporting assessment results.<br />

<strong>How</strong>ever instructors choose to report assessment<br />

results to individual students, <strong>the</strong>re are five principles<br />

of effective reporting that should be employed:<br />

1. Clearly identify and define aspects of student<br />

achievement (standards) on which to report.<br />

2. In<strong>for</strong>m students in advance of what standards<br />

you expect <strong>the</strong>m to meet.<br />

3. Be clear about <strong>the</strong> reasons <strong>for</strong> reporting student<br />

achievement, including how <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation is to<br />

be used, by whom, and <strong>for</strong> what purpose.<br />

4. Use words, scores, graphic displays, or o<strong>the</strong>r symbols<br />

that are clearly understood by <strong>the</strong> student or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r important audience.<br />

5. Provide opportunities to discuss <strong>the</strong> reports with<br />

students and o<strong>the</strong>rs in order to explain and clarify<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir meaning.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!