An Introduction to the Book of Revelation

the two books; showing that the author of the Shepherd had complete
knowledge of the book of Revelation. This is shown in portraying
the church as a woman, Satan as a beast with fine locusts coming
out of his mouth, the Apostles as a part of the spiritual construction
of the church, the believers as wearing white clothes and bearing
crowns 6 . Other Apostolic Fathers also quoted from the Revelation.
b) Justin, the Martyr, knew the book and ascribed it to John
the Apostle 7 . Melito, bishop of Sardis, wrote an essay about "The
Revelation to John 8 ."
c) The Muratorian canon shows that there was no doubt at
all concerning the book of Revelation in the Roman Church close to
the end of the second century.
d) Tertullian often quoted from it, considering it a work of
John the Apostle 9 . similarly St. Clement of Alexandria 10 , Origen 11 ,
St. Irenaeus 12 and St. Hyppolitus of Rome accepted the genuineness
of the Apostolic work and quoted from it, being one of the books of
the Bible. Victorianus - who wrote the earliest interpretation of
Revelation that is still in existence - ascribes the book to John, the
Apostle.
Perhaps St. Dionysius of Alexandria is the only father who,
although accepting the canonicity of the Book, says that the author
is another John from the 70 Apostles. The reason for this can be attributed
to the difference in the style of writing from that in the Gospel
of John and his epistles. The church did not adopt this opinion.
2- He was the Apostle who was known in the churches of
Asia Minor mentioned in the book.
3- History 13 confirms that John the Beloved, was banished
by Emperor Domitian to Island of Patmos where the Apostle saw
the Revelation (1:9).
4- Despite the difference of the subject of the book from that
of the Gospel of John, there are some words mentioned which
15