29.10.2014 Views

the confiscation and shipment of Japanese war record paintings

the confiscation and shipment of Japanese war record paintings

the confiscation and shipment of Japanese war record paintings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

confiscated.<br />

On 1 October 1951, <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Military History in Washington, DC acknowledged that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y received <strong>the</strong> <strong>shipment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Japanese</strong> <strong>war</strong> <strong>record</strong> <strong>paintings</strong> from Japan. However, <strong>the</strong> documents<br />

accompanying <strong>the</strong> <strong>shipment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>paintings</strong> were incomplete <strong>and</strong> do not reflect <strong>the</strong> exact number <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>paintings</strong> in <strong>the</strong> <strong>shipment</strong>. Thus, <strong>the</strong> department requested <strong>the</strong> Occupation <strong>of</strong>ficials concerned with <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>confiscation</strong> to furnish <strong>the</strong>m a complete listing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>paintings</strong> shipped. 18 As a response, Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Chief Engineer sent <strong>the</strong> shipping list previously mentioned in this paper. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice also sent<br />

a set <strong>of</strong> 153 photographs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> confiscated <strong>paintings</strong> to accompany <strong>the</strong> shipping lists, plus <strong>the</strong><br />

condition list <strong>of</strong> each painting in custody. These photographs were taken 2 days before <strong>the</strong> activities<br />

were started to ship <strong>the</strong> <strong>paintings</strong> to <strong>the</strong> US. It was already established that <strong>shipment</strong> started on 26 July<br />

1951. 19 Thus, <strong>the</strong> photographs from which <strong>the</strong> previously introduced 1951 list was constructed from<br />

can be said to be <strong>the</strong> same set <strong>of</strong> photographs sent to Military History. However, as was stated earlier,<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>paintings</strong> in that particular set <strong>of</strong> photographs totaled 154 items. 20<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> this confusion on <strong>the</strong> exact number <strong>of</strong> <strong>paintings</strong> can be attributed to <strong>the</strong> fact that details<br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> <strong>confiscation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> works, from 1945 up to <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> 1946, was not very clear to <strong>the</strong><br />

Occupation personnel by 1951. In a meeting between <strong>the</strong> Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chief Engineer, <strong>the</strong> Religion<br />

Cultural Resources Division <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Civil Information <strong>and</strong> Education Section <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Headquarters <strong>and</strong><br />

Services Comm<strong>and</strong> to discuss <strong>the</strong> final disposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>paintings</strong>, it was stated that none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

participants in <strong>the</strong> meetings were well-informed about <strong>the</strong> subject at h<strong>and</strong>. 21 Whatever information <strong>the</strong>y<br />

had was taken from fragmentary documents. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> impetus for a review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> confiscated<br />

<strong>paintings</strong> seemed to have stemmed from <strong>the</strong> clamor that <strong>the</strong> Allies received requests for <strong>the</strong> release <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> space in which <strong>the</strong> confiscated <strong>paintings</strong> were being stored at <strong>the</strong> Tokyo Municipal Museum. The<br />

petitions came from various <strong>Japanese</strong> art groups who desired to use <strong>the</strong> museum's space for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

groups' exhibitions.<br />

The three now missing <strong>paintings</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> four <strong>paintings</strong> that were not in any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Occupationera<br />

lists but are now part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NMMA catalogue begs <strong>the</strong> following questions. First, what was <strong>the</strong><br />

actual number <strong>of</strong> <strong>paintings</strong> confiscated during <strong>the</strong> Occupation period? Second, are <strong>the</strong>re still more<br />

18 “Shipment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Japanese</strong> War Paintings,” 21 October 1951, micr<strong>of</strong>iche, AG (C) 02214, Modern <strong>Japanese</strong> Political History<br />

Materials Room, National Diet Library.<br />

19 “Shipment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Japanese</strong> War Paintings,” 13 October 1951, micr<strong>of</strong>iche, CIE (C) 06719, ibid.<br />

20 If one was to count <strong>the</strong> <strong>paintings</strong> by <strong>the</strong>ir FEC numbers, <strong>the</strong> total would be 153. This is because <strong>the</strong>re were two works<br />

sharing <strong>the</strong> same FEC number. These works are catalog number 63, “Battle <strong>of</strong>f Nicholson, Hong Kong” by Miyamoto<br />

Saburō <strong>and</strong> catalog number A-6, “On Army Day” by Ōta Kijirō.<br />

21 “Conference Report,” 27 April 1951, micr<strong>of</strong>iche, CIE (A) 08580, Modern <strong>Japanese</strong> Political History Materials Room,<br />

National Diet Library.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!