29.10.2014 Views

The Role of Protein and Amino Acid Nutrition in ... - Adisseo.biz

The Role of Protein and Amino Acid Nutrition in ... - Adisseo.biz

The Role of Protein and Amino Acid Nutrition in ... - Adisseo.biz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ROLE OF PROTEIN AND AMINO<br />

ACID NUTRITION ON REPRODUCTION<br />

OF DAIRY COWS<br />

José Eduardo P. Santos <strong>and</strong> Charles Staples<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Sciences<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Florida


<strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> Reproduction<br />

• Negative association between urea N<br />

concentration <strong>and</strong> pregnancy <strong>in</strong> dairy cows when<br />

urea N is excessive<br />

• Studies evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the effects <strong>of</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> on<br />

embryo quality <strong>and</strong> pregnancy usually fed cows<br />

diets with excessive concentrations <strong>of</strong> true<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> or urea


Influence <strong>of</strong> Dietary Ratio <strong>of</strong> DIP to UIP on MUN<br />

MUN, mg/100 ml<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

5.6<br />

a<br />

11.6<br />

b<br />

13.4<br />

c<br />

14.4<br />

c<br />

17.8<br />

d<br />

JDS 76:525<br />

0<br />

80:80 100:100 120:80 100:120 120:120<br />

Intake <strong>of</strong> DIP & UIP as a % <strong>of</strong> NRC


Relationship <strong>of</strong> Bulk Tank MUN <strong>and</strong> Days to First AI<br />

Days to first AI<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Live. Prod. Sci. 37:91<br />

85<br />

78 78<br />

86<br />

103<br />

128<br />

10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

Milk Urea N, mg/100 ml


Overfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> delays 1st Ovulation<br />

First ovulation, days<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

**<br />

25<br />

39<br />

** 50 * P = 0.10<br />

34<br />

22 26 17<br />

22<br />

Florida Utah Ma<strong>in</strong>e Ma<strong>in</strong>e<br />

*<br />

Control<br />

Excess DIP/CP<br />

** P = 0.05<br />

*


Overfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Delays Conception<br />

Days open<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

**<br />

96<br />

106<br />

* P = 0.10<br />

** P < 0.06<br />

** *<br />

72<br />

82<br />

Control<br />

Excess CP<br />

71 80<br />

Oregon '79 Ma<strong>in</strong>e '88 Ma<strong>in</strong>e '96


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dietary CP% on Fertility<br />

Concep/Preg Rate, %<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Oregon<br />

*<br />

Israel<br />

Israel<br />

*<br />

OK<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Israel<br />

*<br />

13-17% CP diets<br />

19-21% CP diets<br />

NY<br />

*<br />

NY<br />

* *<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e<br />

LA


Dietary CP% on Blood Urea N<br />

Reference Animal No. 13-17% CP 19-21% CP<br />

- - - - BUN, mg% - - - -<br />

Oregon, 1979<br />

Israel, 1981<br />

Israel, 1983<br />

OK, 1987<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e, 1988<br />

Israel, 1989<br />

NY, 1990<br />

NY, 1993<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e, 1996<br />

LA, 1999<br />

30<br />

39<br />

250<br />

109<br />

57<br />

139<br />

65<br />

80<br />

64<br />

119<br />

--<br />

9<br />

9<br />

15<br />

10<br />

25<br />

12<br />

14<br />

9<br />

20<br />

18<br />

15<br />

17<br />

25<br />

24<br />

32<br />

19<br />

24<br />

21<br />

25<br />

Average 14 22


MUN or PUN <strong>and</strong> Pregnancy per AI <strong>in</strong> Dairy Cows<br />

Adapted from Butler et al. J. Anim. Sci. (1996) <strong>and</strong> Ferguson et al. J. Dairy Sci. (1993)<br />

Pregnancy/AI, %<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

49.2<br />

320/650<br />

41.6<br />

119/286<br />

< 19 mg/dL<br />

> 19 mg/dL<br />

30


MUN <strong>and</strong> Predicted Pregnancy at 1 st AI <strong>in</strong><br />

Lactat<strong>in</strong>g Dairy Cows<br />

Negative association only <strong>in</strong> the first<br />

postpartum AI<br />

No effect on subsequent AI<br />

Guo et al. J. Dairy Sci. 87:1878–1885 (2004)


Potential Mechanisms for Reduced<br />

Fertility <strong>in</strong> Lactat<strong>in</strong>g Dairy Cows


Stages <strong>of</strong> the Reproductive Process Important for<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy <strong>in</strong> Cattle<br />

42 d 42 d<br />

Follicular development <strong>and</strong> oocyte growth<br />

Oocyte maturation<br />

Fertilization<br />

Preimplantation development<br />

IFN-τ<br />

x<br />

Prevention <strong>of</strong> Luteolysis<br />

PGF-2α


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dietary <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> on PUN <strong>and</strong> Uter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

pH on d 7 <strong>of</strong> the Estrous Cycle <strong>of</strong> Heifers<br />

P < 0.05 P < 0.05<br />

25<br />

7.2<br />

20<br />

7.1<br />

mg/dl<br />

15<br />

10<br />

pH<br />

7.0<br />

6.9<br />

6.8<br />

5<br />

6.7<br />

0<br />

PUN, mg/dl<br />

6.6<br />

Uter<strong>in</strong>e pH<br />

Balanced High RUP High RDP<br />

Balanced High RUP High RDP<br />

Elrod et al. (1993)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dietary <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> on PUN <strong>and</strong><br />

Conception Rate (CR) <strong>in</strong> Heifers<br />

mg/dl<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

P < 0.05 P < 0.05<br />

%<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

0<br />

Peak PUN<br />

30<br />

CR<br />

Balanced<br />

High RDP<br />

Balanced<br />

High RDP<br />

Elrod e Butler (1993)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Urea/Sal<strong>in</strong>e Infusion on Uter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

pH on d 7-8 <strong>of</strong> the Estrous Cycle<br />

7.4<br />

Uter<strong>in</strong>e pH<br />

PUN<br />

30<br />

Uter<strong>in</strong>e pH<br />

7.3<br />

7.2<br />

7.1<br />

7.0<br />

6.9<br />

6.8<br />

6.7<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

PUN, mg/dL<br />

6.6<br />

6.5<br />

5<br />

6.4<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48<br />

Sal<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Urea<br />

Rhoads et al. J. Dairy Sci. (2004)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Urea Concentration on <strong>in</strong> Vitro Embryo Production<br />

Added to the oocyte maturation medium<br />

Added to the embryo culture medium<br />

Ocon <strong>and</strong> Hansen J. Dairy Sci. 86:1194-1200 (2003)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dimethadione on pH <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> Vitro Embryo Production<br />

Ocon <strong>and</strong> Hansen J. Dairy Sci. 86:1194-1200 (2003)


Pyruvate Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Ov<strong>in</strong>e Blastocyst Produced by<br />

IVF after Maturation with Granulosa Cells Previously<br />

Exposed to NH 4 Cl<br />

30<br />

Blastocyst<br />

P < 0.05 P = 0.06<br />

Cell<br />

0.6<br />

pMol/3h/blastocyst<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

pMol/3h/cell<br />

10<br />

0mM 5mM 10mM 0 Mm 5 mM 10 mM<br />

0.1<br />

NH4Cl (granulosa cells)<br />

Rooke et al. Anim. Reprod. Sci. (2000)


Effect <strong>of</strong> CP <strong>and</strong> RDP on Embryo Quality from<br />

Superovulated Cows<br />

CP (RDP)<br />

Cows<br />

Transferable Embryos<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Oocytes<br />

Transferable<br />

%<br />

Viable, vital<br />

sta<strong>in</strong><br />

%<br />

Reference<br />

12.3<br />

(59.7)<br />

27.4<br />

(70.7)<br />

22 4.0 1.6 1.8 49.7 53.1 b Garcia-Bojalil et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

22 4.9 2.0 1.8 54.0 66.7 a<br />

15.7<br />

(ND)<br />

21.9<br />

(ND)<br />

12 3.4 0.3 0.5 82.0 ND<br />

11 5.0 0.6 0.5 83.0 ND<br />

Rhoads et al. (2006)<br />

16.0<br />

(73.0)<br />

16.1<br />

(64.0)<br />

19 4.5 4.0 3.1 44.2 b ND<br />

Blanchard et al.<br />

(1990)<br />

19 5.5 3.3 2.3 66.9 a ND<br />

a, b P < 0.10


Effect <strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g on embryonic survival<br />

Rhoads et al. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 91: 1 (2006)<br />

15.5 mg/dL vs 24.4 mg/dL 7.7 mg/dL vs 25.2 mg/dL


<strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Can Also Influence<br />

Energy Metabolism


Effect <strong>of</strong> DIP & Fat on Reproduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dairy Cows (Garcia-Bojalil et al., 1998)<br />

• 45 multiparous Holste<strong>in</strong> cows<br />

• Dietary treatments were<br />

– 1) 11.1% DIP, 0% CaLCFA<br />

– 2) 11.1% DIP, 2.2% CaLCFA<br />

– 3) 15.7% DIP, 0% CaLCFA<br />

– 4) 15.7% DIP, 2.2% CaLCFA<br />

• Diets fed for the first 17 weeks PP


Effect <strong>of</strong> DIP & Fat on Reproduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dairy Cows (Garcia-Bojalil et al., 1998)<br />

Dietary <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Sources<br />

• 11.1% DIP diets<br />

– Corn gluten meal<br />

– Fish meal<br />

– Blood meal<br />

– Meat <strong>and</strong> bone meal<br />

• 15.7% DIP diets<br />

– Soybean meal <strong>and</strong> urea


Effect <strong>of</strong> DIP <strong>and</strong> Fat on Body<br />

Weight Change <strong>of</strong> Lactat<strong>in</strong>g Cows<br />

Body weight, kg<br />

620<br />

600<br />

580<br />

560<br />

540<br />

520<br />

DIP; P = 0.01<br />

11.1% DIP<br />

" + fat<br />

15.7% DIP<br />

" + fat<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> lactation


Effect <strong>of</strong> DIP <strong>and</strong> Fat on<br />

Accumulated Plasma Progesterone<br />

Progesterone, ng/ml<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

DIP by FAT <strong>in</strong>terxn; P = 0.001<br />

11.1% DIP<br />

" + fat<br />

15.7% DIP<br />

" + fat<br />

1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50<br />

Day <strong>of</strong> lactation


Some <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Sources Have<br />

Been L<strong>in</strong>ked with Improved<br />

Fertility


Pregnancy/Conception<br />

Rates Due to Feed<strong>in</strong>g Fish Meal<br />

% conception/pregnancy<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

*<br />

**<br />

**P< 0.05; *P


What are Reasonable<br />

MUN or BUN Values?


Typical MUN Values <strong>of</strong> Cows Fed<br />

Diets Balanced for N <strong>and</strong> Energy<br />

Reference<br />

MUN, mg%<br />

Oltner <strong>and</strong> Wiktorsson, 1983 13.8<br />

Roseler et al., 1993 11.6<br />

Jonker et al., 1998 13.5


Urea<br />

Detoxification by liver<br />

Ammonia<br />

Deam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>Acid</strong>s<br />

Rumen<br />

Small<br />

Intest<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Muscle


Diet Conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 17% CP <strong>and</strong> Balanced for Met<br />

(2.17% MP) & Lys (6.8% MP) Requirements<br />

• Lactat<strong>in</strong>g cow produc<strong>in</strong>g 45 kg <strong>of</strong> milk with 3.15%<br />

true prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> consum<strong>in</strong>g 25 kg <strong>of</strong> DM<br />

– Metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> required = 3,050 g/d<br />

– Metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take = 3,150 g/d<br />

– Predicted PUN = 21 mg/dL<br />

3% surplus <strong>of</strong> MP<br />

• Lactat<strong>in</strong>g cow produc<strong>in</strong>g 20 kg <strong>of</strong> milk with 3.30%<br />

true prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> consum<strong>in</strong>g 16 kg <strong>of</strong> DM<br />

– Metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> required = 1,600 g/d<br />

– Metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take = 1,935 g/d<br />

– Predicted PUN = 14 mg/dL<br />

20% surplus <strong>of</strong> MP


N Metabolism by Rumen Bacteria<br />

Peptides<br />

Peptides <strong>and</strong> AA<br />

Mono & Disaccharides<br />

<strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong>s<br />

deam<strong>in</strong>ase<br />

Peptides & AA<br />

Microbial cells<br />

& VFAs<br />

NH 3 + Keto-acid<br />

ATP<br />

ADP<br />

Portal<br />

System<br />

NH 3 + H NH 4<br />

Deam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> AA <strong>and</strong> NH 3<br />

production results from lack <strong>of</strong> ATP<br />

available for microbial growth


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dietary <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Concentration <strong>and</strong><br />

Quality on Performance <strong>of</strong> Dairy Cows<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

LoCP = 17.0%<br />

HiCP = 18.3%<br />

40.8<br />

46.2<br />

b<br />

42.9<br />

46.6<br />

b<br />

kg/d<br />

35<br />

30<br />

a<br />

a<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

a<br />

b b b<br />

HiCP-LoDRUP HiCP-HiDRUP LoCP-HiDRUP LoCP-<br />

HiDRUP+Met<br />

DM <strong>in</strong>take, kg/d Milk, kg/d N<strong>of</strong>tsger <strong>and</strong> St. Pierre J. Dairy Sci. (2003)


Excess <strong>of</strong><br />

dietary<br />

prote<strong>in</strong><br />

NH 3<br />

urea<br />

prote<strong>in</strong><br />

AA<br />

?<br />

NH 3 /NH 4<br />

+<br />

Urea + NH 3<br />

?<br />

Follicle<br />

development<br />

Toxic effects on<br />

oocytes <strong>and</strong><br />

granulosa cells<br />

Enhances<br />

blastocyst<br />

development<br />

Delays embryo<br />

transport<br />

Impairs early<br />

embryonic development


Summary - <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

‣ Only excessive amounts <strong>of</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>/N might <strong>in</strong>fluence embryo<br />

quality <strong>and</strong> pregnancy<br />

alter the uter<strong>in</strong>e environment (pH)<br />

‣ Associated with <strong>in</strong>creased urea-N <strong>in</strong> reproductive tissues<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> ATP for adequate microbial growth relative to N availability <strong>in</strong> the rumen<br />

‣ Recommendations<br />

Formulate diets based on metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

animal<br />

Lactat<strong>in</strong>g cows: reduce the CP content to ~ 16 to 17% when<br />

high quality prote<strong>in</strong> sources are utilized <strong>and</strong> balance for<br />

am<strong>in</strong>o acids


<strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>Acid</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Reproduction<br />

• Bov<strong>in</strong>e conceptus requires am<strong>in</strong>o acids for development<br />

– Embryo growth<br />

– Placental development<br />

• Some am<strong>in</strong>o acids have physiological functions beyond<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g blocks for tissue deposition<br />

– Signal<strong>in</strong>g molecules (Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e -> NO, polyam<strong>in</strong>es)<br />

– Energy metabolism (Glyc<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

– Neurotransmiter (GABA)<br />

– DNA methylation (Methion<strong>in</strong>e)


Bov<strong>in</strong>e Peri-Implantation Events<br />

Conceptus<br />

position<br />

Conceptus<br />

Development<br />

Estradiol<br />

(pg/ml)<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Fimbria<br />

Oviduct<br />

Utero-tubal<br />

junction<br />

Shedd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

zona pellucida<br />

425µ<br />

150µ 170µ 205µ 340µ<br />

IFN τ production<br />

by trophoblast<br />

3<br />

mm<br />

Implantation<br />

250 mm<br />

Progesterone<br />

Estradiol<br />

6<br />

3<br />

Progesterone<br />

(ng/ml)<br />

0<br />

4<br />

8<br />

Days after mat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

12 16<br />

20


Some <strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>Acid</strong>s are Neurotransmiters<br />

‣ Aspartate, glyc<strong>in</strong>e, glutamate, <strong>and</strong> gamma am<strong>in</strong>obutyric acid<br />

(GABA)<br />

‣ B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> N-Methyl-D-Aspartate to receptors results <strong>in</strong><br />

activation <strong>of</strong> ion channels <strong>in</strong> neurons <strong>and</strong> allows for entry <strong>of</strong> Na +<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ca ++ <strong>and</strong> exit <strong>of</strong> K +<br />

Stimulates the release <strong>of</strong> GnRH


Hormonal relationship between the hypothalamus,<br />

anterior pituitary <strong>and</strong> ovary<br />

Senger, 2003


DNA Methylation<br />

• Embryos up to the 8 cell stage:<br />

– DNA is de-methylated<br />

• 8 cell to Morula:<br />

– DNA is methylated<br />

– Modifies <strong>and</strong> add epigenetic <strong>in</strong>formation to the<br />

genome <strong>of</strong> the embryo. This process “epigenetic<br />

reprogram<strong>in</strong>g” is complete <strong>in</strong> the early embryonic<br />

stages


Methylation Pathways<br />

(DNA, prote<strong>in</strong>s, lipids)<br />

Phosphatidyl<br />

Chol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Phosphatidil-<br />

Etanolam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

CH 3<br />

S-adenosyl-Met<br />

S-adenosylhomocyste<strong>in</strong>e<br />

CDP-Chol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Dimethylglyc<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Met<br />

Tetrahydr<strong>of</strong>olate<br />

B 12<br />

Chol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Beta<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Homocysthe<strong>in</strong>e<br />

CH 3 -Tetrahydr<strong>of</strong>olate<br />

Acetylchol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Cyste<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Glutathione


<strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> Concentrations <strong>in</strong> the Oviduct<br />

<strong>and</strong> Uterus <strong>of</strong> Dairy Heifers<br />

<strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> acid concentration, µM<br />

2,200<br />

2,000<br />

1,800<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Oviduct<br />

Uterus<br />

Asp Glu Asn Ser His Gln Gly Thr Arg Tau Ala Tyr Met Trp Val Phe Ile Leu Lys<br />

Hugentobler et al. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 94: 445-454 (2007


Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentrations <strong>in</strong> Different<br />

Body Compartments <strong>of</strong> Dairy Cows<br />

• Plasma:<br />

– 16 to 35 µMol/L<br />

• Uter<strong>in</strong>e fluid:<br />

– 31 to 46 µMol/L<br />

• Oviduct:<br />

– 31 to 49 µMol/L<br />

Hugentobler et al. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 94: 445-454 (2007


2 Experiments<br />

• Bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo development cultured <strong>in</strong> presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> different concentrations <strong>of</strong> methion<strong>in</strong>e<br />

– What is the adequate concentration <strong>in</strong> vitro for early<br />

embryo development?<br />

– Can embryo development be improve if<br />

concentrations are greater than normally found <strong>in</strong><br />

reproductive tissues?


Effect <strong>of</strong> Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentration on <strong>in</strong> Vitro<br />

Development to Blastocyst <strong>in</strong> Cattle<br />

40<br />

35<br />

Day 7<br />

a,b<br />

P < 0.05<br />

40<br />

35<br />

b<br />

Day 8<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a,b<br />

P < 0.01<br />

b<br />

b<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

a<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

a<br />

5<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 35 50 100 200 400<br />

µM<br />

0<br />

0 35 50 100 200 400<br />

µM<br />

Bonilla et al. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 92, E-Suppl. 1 (Abstr.) pp. 69 (2009)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentration on<br />

Blastocyst Cell Number<br />

250<br />

Blastocyst<br />

250<br />

Exp<strong>and</strong>ed Blastocyst<br />

200<br />

200<br />

Cell number<br />

150<br />

100<br />

Cell number<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0 35 50 100 200 400<br />

µM<br />

0<br />

0 35 50 100 200 400<br />

µM<br />

Bonilla et al. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 92, E-Suppl. 1 (Abstr.) pp. 69 (2009)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentration on <strong>in</strong> Vitro<br />

Development to Blastocyst <strong>in</strong> Cattle<br />

Blastocyst/oocyte, %<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Day 7<br />

c<br />

c<br />

a,b, c<br />

P < 0.05<br />

bc<br />

bc<br />

Blastocyst/oocyte, %<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Day 8<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a,b<br />

P = 0.01<br />

b<br />

b<br />

0<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

µM<br />

0<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

µM<br />

Bonilla et al. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 92, E-Suppl. 1 (Abstr.) pp. 69 (2009)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentration on Glutathione<br />

Concentration <strong>and</strong> % <strong>of</strong> Advanced Blastocyst<br />

Glutathione, pMol on d 7<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Glutathione on D 7<br />

a<br />

a,b<br />

P < 0.005<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

µM<br />

Advanced Blastocyst, %<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Day 7<br />

a,b, c<br />

P < 0.001<br />

c<br />

bc bc<br />

bc<br />

b<br />

a<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

µM<br />

Bonilla et al. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 92, E-Suppl. 1 (Abstr.) pp. 69 (2009)


Metabolic fates <strong>of</strong> arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> mammalian cells<br />

Wu <strong>and</strong> Morris Jr. Biochem. J. (1998) 336, 1-17


NO <strong>and</strong> Polyam<strong>in</strong>es Enhance Angiogenesis <strong>and</strong><br />

are Potent Vasodilator <strong>in</strong> the Lungs <strong>and</strong> Placenta<br />

• Increase blood flow<br />

<strong>and</strong> nutrient supply<br />

to the fetus (Sladek<br />

et al., 1997)<br />

• Reverse some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

growth<br />

retardation <strong>in</strong><br />

humans <strong>and</strong> sheep<br />

(de Boo et al. 2005;<br />

Thureen et al., 2002)


Approximate Embryonic <strong>and</strong> Fetal Losses<br />

When Calv<strong>in</strong>g Rate is 30%<br />

100<br />

80<br />

10-15%<br />

fertilization<br />

failure<br />

25% <strong>of</strong> the pregnancies<br />

are lost after placentation<br />

Two-cell Bov<strong>in</strong>e Embryo<br />

Embryo<br />

Cow<br />

Number<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON<br />

--Genetic <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />

--Non-genetic <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />

(from egg & sperm)<br />

--Environment<br />

57%<br />

early<br />

embryo<br />

mortality 15%<br />

late<br />

embryo<br />

mortality<br />

10%<br />

fetal loss<br />

AI Fertilization Day 28 Day 45 Term<br />

US<br />

Palpation


Calcium-Independent iNOS Activity <strong>in</strong> Mur<strong>in</strong>e Placenta<br />

on Different Days <strong>of</strong> Gestation<br />

Baylis et al. Mol. Human Reprod. vol.5 pp. 277–286, 1999


In Situ Hybridization for Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS)<br />

mRNA <strong>in</strong> Human Placenta<br />

A<br />

B<br />

A = sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the syncytioblast <strong>and</strong> cytotrophoblast<br />

B = negative control<br />

C = light photomicroscopy <strong>of</strong> a placental arteriole<br />

D = dark photomicroscopy <strong>of</strong> a placental arteriole<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Baylis et al. Mol. Human Reprod. vol.5 pp. 277–286, 1999


In Situ Hybridization for Cationic AA Transporter <strong>in</strong><br />

Ov<strong>in</strong>e Endometrium


Effect <strong>of</strong> Daily Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e i.v. Infusion on Progesterone <strong>and</strong><br />

Ovarian Artery Resistance Index<br />

Progesterone, ng/mL<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

AUC: P < 0.004<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

Control<br />

Resistance <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

P < 0.05<br />

1<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15<br />

Day <strong>of</strong> the cycle<br />

0<br />

Control<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>fused at 27 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> BW from estrus to d 15<br />

Luther et al. unpublished


Number <strong>of</strong> CL <strong>and</strong> Fetuses <strong>in</strong> Ewes Treated<br />

or Not with i.v. Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

Number per ewe<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Control<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

P < 0.05 P < 0.03<br />

0.0<br />

CL D 25 D 45<br />

Luther et al. unpublished


Number <strong>of</strong> CL <strong>and</strong> Fetuses <strong>in</strong> Sows Fed a Diet<br />

with 1% Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

Number or Kg<br />

18.0<br />

15.0<br />

12.0<br />

9.0<br />

6.0<br />

3.0<br />

Control<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

P < 0.05<br />

P < 0.05<br />

0.0<br />

Piglets/liter Live/liter Liter birth weight<br />

Mateo et al. J. Nutr. 137: 652-656 (2007)


Summary<br />

• Glyc<strong>in</strong>e is the ma<strong>in</strong> am<strong>in</strong>o acid <strong>in</strong> the reproductive tract <strong>of</strong><br />

bov<strong>in</strong>e<br />

– Energy source for the early embryo; synthesis <strong>of</strong> other AA; tissue deposition<br />

• Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

– Might mediate improvements <strong>in</strong> CL function <strong>and</strong> placentation through gaseous<br />

signal<strong>in</strong>g, angiogenesis <strong>and</strong> blood flow<br />

• Methion<strong>in</strong>e<br />

– Tissue deposition<br />

– Phospholipid synthesis<br />

– DNA methylation<br />

– Concentrations <strong>in</strong> the oviduct <strong>and</strong> endometrium seem adequate for optimum<br />

early embryo development


THANK YOU<br />

José Eduardo P. Santos<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Sciences<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Florida<br />

Jepsantos@ufl.edu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!