29.10.2014 Views

The Role of Protein and Amino Acid Nutrition in ... - Adisseo.biz

The Role of Protein and Amino Acid Nutrition in ... - Adisseo.biz

The Role of Protein and Amino Acid Nutrition in ... - Adisseo.biz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ROLE OF PROTEIN AND AMINO<br />

ACID NUTRITION ON REPRODUCTION<br />

OF DAIRY COWS<br />

José Eduardo P. Santos <strong>and</strong> Charles Staples<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Sciences<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Florida


<strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>and</strong> Reproduction<br />

• Negative association between urea N<br />

concentration <strong>and</strong> pregnancy <strong>in</strong> dairy cows when<br />

urea N is excessive<br />

• Studies evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the effects <strong>of</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> on<br />

embryo quality <strong>and</strong> pregnancy usually fed cows<br />

diets with excessive concentrations <strong>of</strong> true<br />

prote<strong>in</strong> or urea


Influence <strong>of</strong> Dietary Ratio <strong>of</strong> DIP to UIP on MUN<br />

MUN, mg/100 ml<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

5.6<br />

a<br />

11.6<br />

b<br />

13.4<br />

c<br />

14.4<br />

c<br />

17.8<br />

d<br />

JDS 76:525<br />

0<br />

80:80 100:100 120:80 100:120 120:120<br />

Intake <strong>of</strong> DIP & UIP as a % <strong>of</strong> NRC


Relationship <strong>of</strong> Bulk Tank MUN <strong>and</strong> Days to First AI<br />

Days to first AI<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Live. Prod. Sci. 37:91<br />

85<br />

78 78<br />

86<br />

103<br />

128<br />

10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

Milk Urea N, mg/100 ml


Overfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> delays 1st Ovulation<br />

First ovulation, days<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

**<br />

25<br />

39<br />

** 50 * P = 0.10<br />

34<br />

22 26 17<br />

22<br />

Florida Utah Ma<strong>in</strong>e Ma<strong>in</strong>e<br />

*<br />

Control<br />

Excess DIP/CP<br />

** P = 0.05<br />

*


Overfeed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Delays Conception<br />

Days open<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

**<br />

96<br />

106<br />

* P = 0.10<br />

** P < 0.06<br />

** *<br />

72<br />

82<br />

Control<br />

Excess CP<br />

71 80<br />

Oregon '79 Ma<strong>in</strong>e '88 Ma<strong>in</strong>e '96


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dietary CP% on Fertility<br />

Concep/Preg Rate, %<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Oregon<br />

*<br />

Israel<br />

Israel<br />

*<br />

OK<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Israel<br />

*<br />

13-17% CP diets<br />

19-21% CP diets<br />

NY<br />

*<br />

NY<br />

* *<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e<br />

LA


Dietary CP% on Blood Urea N<br />

Reference Animal No. 13-17% CP 19-21% CP<br />

- - - - BUN, mg% - - - -<br />

Oregon, 1979<br />

Israel, 1981<br />

Israel, 1983<br />

OK, 1987<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e, 1988<br />

Israel, 1989<br />

NY, 1990<br />

NY, 1993<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e, 1996<br />

LA, 1999<br />

30<br />

39<br />

250<br />

109<br />

57<br />

139<br />

65<br />

80<br />

64<br />

119<br />

--<br />

9<br />

9<br />

15<br />

10<br />

25<br />

12<br />

14<br />

9<br />

20<br />

18<br />

15<br />

17<br />

25<br />

24<br />

32<br />

19<br />

24<br />

21<br />

25<br />

Average 14 22


MUN or PUN <strong>and</strong> Pregnancy per AI <strong>in</strong> Dairy Cows<br />

Adapted from Butler et al. J. Anim. Sci. (1996) <strong>and</strong> Ferguson et al. J. Dairy Sci. (1993)<br />

Pregnancy/AI, %<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

49.2<br />

320/650<br />

41.6<br />

119/286<br />

< 19 mg/dL<br />

> 19 mg/dL<br />

30


MUN <strong>and</strong> Predicted Pregnancy at 1 st AI <strong>in</strong><br />

Lactat<strong>in</strong>g Dairy Cows<br />

Negative association only <strong>in</strong> the first<br />

postpartum AI<br />

No effect on subsequent AI<br />

Guo et al. J. Dairy Sci. 87:1878–1885 (2004)


Potential Mechanisms for Reduced<br />

Fertility <strong>in</strong> Lactat<strong>in</strong>g Dairy Cows


Stages <strong>of</strong> the Reproductive Process Important for<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy <strong>in</strong> Cattle<br />

42 d 42 d<br />

Follicular development <strong>and</strong> oocyte growth<br />

Oocyte maturation<br />

Fertilization<br />

Preimplantation development<br />

IFN-τ<br />

x<br />

Prevention <strong>of</strong> Luteolysis<br />

PGF-2α


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dietary <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> on PUN <strong>and</strong> Uter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

pH on d 7 <strong>of</strong> the Estrous Cycle <strong>of</strong> Heifers<br />

P < 0.05 P < 0.05<br />

25<br />

7.2<br />

20<br />

7.1<br />

mg/dl<br />

15<br />

10<br />

pH<br />

7.0<br />

6.9<br />

6.8<br />

5<br />

6.7<br />

0<br />

PUN, mg/dl<br />

6.6<br />

Uter<strong>in</strong>e pH<br />

Balanced High RUP High RDP<br />

Balanced High RUP High RDP<br />

Elrod et al. (1993)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dietary <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> on PUN <strong>and</strong><br />

Conception Rate (CR) <strong>in</strong> Heifers<br />

mg/dl<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

P < 0.05 P < 0.05<br />

%<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

0<br />

Peak PUN<br />

30<br />

CR<br />

Balanced<br />

High RDP<br />

Balanced<br />

High RDP<br />

Elrod e Butler (1993)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Urea/Sal<strong>in</strong>e Infusion on Uter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

pH on d 7-8 <strong>of</strong> the Estrous Cycle<br />

7.4<br />

Uter<strong>in</strong>e pH<br />

PUN<br />

30<br />

Uter<strong>in</strong>e pH<br />

7.3<br />

7.2<br />

7.1<br />

7.0<br />

6.9<br />

6.8<br />

6.7<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

PUN, mg/dL<br />

6.6<br />

6.5<br />

5<br />

6.4<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48<br />

Sal<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Urea<br />

Rhoads et al. J. Dairy Sci. (2004)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Urea Concentration on <strong>in</strong> Vitro Embryo Production<br />

Added to the oocyte maturation medium<br />

Added to the embryo culture medium<br />

Ocon <strong>and</strong> Hansen J. Dairy Sci. 86:1194-1200 (2003)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dimethadione on pH <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> Vitro Embryo Production<br />

Ocon <strong>and</strong> Hansen J. Dairy Sci. 86:1194-1200 (2003)


Pyruvate Metabolism <strong>of</strong> Ov<strong>in</strong>e Blastocyst Produced by<br />

IVF after Maturation with Granulosa Cells Previously<br />

Exposed to NH 4 Cl<br />

30<br />

Blastocyst<br />

P < 0.05 P = 0.06<br />

Cell<br />

0.6<br />

pMol/3h/blastocyst<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

pMol/3h/cell<br />

10<br />

0mM 5mM 10mM 0 Mm 5 mM 10 mM<br />

0.1<br />

NH4Cl (granulosa cells)<br />

Rooke et al. Anim. Reprod. Sci. (2000)


Effect <strong>of</strong> CP <strong>and</strong> RDP on Embryo Quality from<br />

Superovulated Cows<br />

CP (RDP)<br />

Cows<br />

Transferable Embryos<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Oocytes<br />

Transferable<br />

%<br />

Viable, vital<br />

sta<strong>in</strong><br />

%<br />

Reference<br />

12.3<br />

(59.7)<br />

27.4<br />

(70.7)<br />

22 4.0 1.6 1.8 49.7 53.1 b Garcia-Bojalil et al.<br />

(1994)<br />

22 4.9 2.0 1.8 54.0 66.7 a<br />

15.7<br />

(ND)<br />

21.9<br />

(ND)<br />

12 3.4 0.3 0.5 82.0 ND<br />

11 5.0 0.6 0.5 83.0 ND<br />

Rhoads et al. (2006)<br />

16.0<br />

(73.0)<br />

16.1<br />

(64.0)<br />

19 4.5 4.0 3.1 44.2 b ND<br />

Blanchard et al.<br />

(1990)<br />

19 5.5 3.3 2.3 66.9 a ND<br />

a, b P < 0.10


Effect <strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g on embryonic survival<br />

Rhoads et al. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 91: 1 (2006)<br />

15.5 mg/dL vs 24.4 mg/dL 7.7 mg/dL vs 25.2 mg/dL


<strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Can Also Influence<br />

Energy Metabolism


Effect <strong>of</strong> DIP & Fat on Reproduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dairy Cows (Garcia-Bojalil et al., 1998)<br />

• 45 multiparous Holste<strong>in</strong> cows<br />

• Dietary treatments were<br />

– 1) 11.1% DIP, 0% CaLCFA<br />

– 2) 11.1% DIP, 2.2% CaLCFA<br />

– 3) 15.7% DIP, 0% CaLCFA<br />

– 4) 15.7% DIP, 2.2% CaLCFA<br />

• Diets fed for the first 17 weeks PP


Effect <strong>of</strong> DIP & Fat on Reproduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dairy Cows (Garcia-Bojalil et al., 1998)<br />

Dietary <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Sources<br />

• 11.1% DIP diets<br />

– Corn gluten meal<br />

– Fish meal<br />

– Blood meal<br />

– Meat <strong>and</strong> bone meal<br />

• 15.7% DIP diets<br />

– Soybean meal <strong>and</strong> urea


Effect <strong>of</strong> DIP <strong>and</strong> Fat on Body<br />

Weight Change <strong>of</strong> Lactat<strong>in</strong>g Cows<br />

Body weight, kg<br />

620<br />

600<br />

580<br />

560<br />

540<br />

520<br />

DIP; P = 0.01<br />

11.1% DIP<br />

" + fat<br />

15.7% DIP<br />

" + fat<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14<br />

Week <strong>of</strong> lactation


Effect <strong>of</strong> DIP <strong>and</strong> Fat on<br />

Accumulated Plasma Progesterone<br />

Progesterone, ng/ml<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

DIP by FAT <strong>in</strong>terxn; P = 0.001<br />

11.1% DIP<br />

" + fat<br />

15.7% DIP<br />

" + fat<br />

1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50<br />

Day <strong>of</strong> lactation


Some <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Sources Have<br />

Been L<strong>in</strong>ked with Improved<br />

Fertility


Pregnancy/Conception<br />

Rates Due to Feed<strong>in</strong>g Fish Meal<br />

% conception/pregnancy<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

*<br />

**<br />

**P< 0.05; *P


What are Reasonable<br />

MUN or BUN Values?


Typical MUN Values <strong>of</strong> Cows Fed<br />

Diets Balanced for N <strong>and</strong> Energy<br />

Reference<br />

MUN, mg%<br />

Oltner <strong>and</strong> Wiktorsson, 1983 13.8<br />

Roseler et al., 1993 11.6<br />

Jonker et al., 1998 13.5


Urea<br />

Detoxification by liver<br />

Ammonia<br />

Deam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>Acid</strong>s<br />

Rumen<br />

Small<br />

Intest<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Muscle


Diet Conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 17% CP <strong>and</strong> Balanced for Met<br />

(2.17% MP) & Lys (6.8% MP) Requirements<br />

• Lactat<strong>in</strong>g cow produc<strong>in</strong>g 45 kg <strong>of</strong> milk with 3.15%<br />

true prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> consum<strong>in</strong>g 25 kg <strong>of</strong> DM<br />

– Metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> required = 3,050 g/d<br />

– Metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take = 3,150 g/d<br />

– Predicted PUN = 21 mg/dL<br />

3% surplus <strong>of</strong> MP<br />

• Lactat<strong>in</strong>g cow produc<strong>in</strong>g 20 kg <strong>of</strong> milk with 3.30%<br />

true prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> consum<strong>in</strong>g 16 kg <strong>of</strong> DM<br />

– Metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> required = 1,600 g/d<br />

– Metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>take = 1,935 g/d<br />

– Predicted PUN = 14 mg/dL<br />

20% surplus <strong>of</strong> MP


N Metabolism by Rumen Bacteria<br />

Peptides<br />

Peptides <strong>and</strong> AA<br />

Mono & Disaccharides<br />

<strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong>s<br />

deam<strong>in</strong>ase<br />

Peptides & AA<br />

Microbial cells<br />

& VFAs<br />

NH 3 + Keto-acid<br />

ATP<br />

ADP<br />

Portal<br />

System<br />

NH 3 + H NH 4<br />

Deam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> AA <strong>and</strong> NH 3<br />

production results from lack <strong>of</strong> ATP<br />

available for microbial growth


Effect <strong>of</strong> Dietary <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong> Concentration <strong>and</strong><br />

Quality on Performance <strong>of</strong> Dairy Cows<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

LoCP = 17.0%<br />

HiCP = 18.3%<br />

40.8<br />

46.2<br />

b<br />

42.9<br />

46.6<br />

b<br />

kg/d<br />

35<br />

30<br />

a<br />

a<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

a<br />

b b b<br />

HiCP-LoDRUP HiCP-HiDRUP LoCP-HiDRUP LoCP-<br />

HiDRUP+Met<br />

DM <strong>in</strong>take, kg/d Milk, kg/d N<strong>of</strong>tsger <strong>and</strong> St. Pierre J. Dairy Sci. (2003)


Excess <strong>of</strong><br />

dietary<br />

prote<strong>in</strong><br />

NH 3<br />

urea<br />

prote<strong>in</strong><br />

AA<br />

?<br />

NH 3 /NH 4<br />

+<br />

Urea + NH 3<br />

?<br />

Follicle<br />

development<br />

Toxic effects on<br />

oocytes <strong>and</strong><br />

granulosa cells<br />

Enhances<br />

blastocyst<br />

development<br />

Delays embryo<br />

transport<br />

Impairs early<br />

embryonic development


Summary - <strong>Prote<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

‣ Only excessive amounts <strong>of</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>/N might <strong>in</strong>fluence embryo<br />

quality <strong>and</strong> pregnancy<br />

alter the uter<strong>in</strong>e environment (pH)<br />

‣ Associated with <strong>in</strong>creased urea-N <strong>in</strong> reproductive tissues<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> ATP for adequate microbial growth relative to N availability <strong>in</strong> the rumen<br />

‣ Recommendations<br />

Formulate diets based on metabolizable prote<strong>in</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

animal<br />

Lactat<strong>in</strong>g cows: reduce the CP content to ~ 16 to 17% when<br />

high quality prote<strong>in</strong> sources are utilized <strong>and</strong> balance for<br />

am<strong>in</strong>o acids


<strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>Acid</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Reproduction<br />

• Bov<strong>in</strong>e conceptus requires am<strong>in</strong>o acids for development<br />

– Embryo growth<br />

– Placental development<br />

• Some am<strong>in</strong>o acids have physiological functions beyond<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g blocks for tissue deposition<br />

– Signal<strong>in</strong>g molecules (Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e -> NO, polyam<strong>in</strong>es)<br />

– Energy metabolism (Glyc<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

– Neurotransmiter (GABA)<br />

– DNA methylation (Methion<strong>in</strong>e)


Bov<strong>in</strong>e Peri-Implantation Events<br />

Conceptus<br />

position<br />

Conceptus<br />

Development<br />

Estradiol<br />

(pg/ml)<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Fimbria<br />

Oviduct<br />

Utero-tubal<br />

junction<br />

Shedd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

zona pellucida<br />

425µ<br />

150µ 170µ 205µ 340µ<br />

IFN τ production<br />

by trophoblast<br />

3<br />

mm<br />

Implantation<br />

250 mm<br />

Progesterone<br />

Estradiol<br />

6<br />

3<br />

Progesterone<br />

(ng/ml)<br />

0<br />

4<br />

8<br />

Days after mat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

12 16<br />

20


Some <strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>Acid</strong>s are Neurotransmiters<br />

‣ Aspartate, glyc<strong>in</strong>e, glutamate, <strong>and</strong> gamma am<strong>in</strong>obutyric acid<br />

(GABA)<br />

‣ B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> N-Methyl-D-Aspartate to receptors results <strong>in</strong><br />

activation <strong>of</strong> ion channels <strong>in</strong> neurons <strong>and</strong> allows for entry <strong>of</strong> Na +<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ca ++ <strong>and</strong> exit <strong>of</strong> K +<br />

Stimulates the release <strong>of</strong> GnRH


Hormonal relationship between the hypothalamus,<br />

anterior pituitary <strong>and</strong> ovary<br />

Senger, 2003


DNA Methylation<br />

• Embryos up to the 8 cell stage:<br />

– DNA is de-methylated<br />

• 8 cell to Morula:<br />

– DNA is methylated<br />

– Modifies <strong>and</strong> add epigenetic <strong>in</strong>formation to the<br />

genome <strong>of</strong> the embryo. This process “epigenetic<br />

reprogram<strong>in</strong>g” is complete <strong>in</strong> the early embryonic<br />

stages


Methylation Pathways<br />

(DNA, prote<strong>in</strong>s, lipids)<br />

Phosphatidyl<br />

Chol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Phosphatidil-<br />

Etanolam<strong>in</strong>e<br />

CH 3<br />

S-adenosyl-Met<br />

S-adenosylhomocyste<strong>in</strong>e<br />

CDP-Chol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Dimethylglyc<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Met<br />

Tetrahydr<strong>of</strong>olate<br />

B 12<br />

Chol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Beta<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Homocysthe<strong>in</strong>e<br />

CH 3 -Tetrahydr<strong>of</strong>olate<br />

Acetylchol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Cyste<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Glutathione


<strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>Acid</strong> Concentrations <strong>in</strong> the Oviduct<br />

<strong>and</strong> Uterus <strong>of</strong> Dairy Heifers<br />

<strong>Am<strong>in</strong>o</strong> acid concentration, µM<br />

2,200<br />

2,000<br />

1,800<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Oviduct<br />

Uterus<br />

Asp Glu Asn Ser His Gln Gly Thr Arg Tau Ala Tyr Met Trp Val Phe Ile Leu Lys<br />

Hugentobler et al. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 94: 445-454 (2007


Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentrations <strong>in</strong> Different<br />

Body Compartments <strong>of</strong> Dairy Cows<br />

• Plasma:<br />

– 16 to 35 µMol/L<br />

• Uter<strong>in</strong>e fluid:<br />

– 31 to 46 µMol/L<br />

• Oviduct:<br />

– 31 to 49 µMol/L<br />

Hugentobler et al. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 94: 445-454 (2007


2 Experiments<br />

• Bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo development cultured <strong>in</strong> presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> different concentrations <strong>of</strong> methion<strong>in</strong>e<br />

– What is the adequate concentration <strong>in</strong> vitro for early<br />

embryo development?<br />

– Can embryo development be improve if<br />

concentrations are greater than normally found <strong>in</strong><br />

reproductive tissues?


Effect <strong>of</strong> Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentration on <strong>in</strong> Vitro<br />

Development to Blastocyst <strong>in</strong> Cattle<br />

40<br />

35<br />

Day 7<br />

a,b<br />

P < 0.05<br />

40<br />

35<br />

b<br />

Day 8<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a,b<br />

P < 0.01<br />

b<br />

b<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

a<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

a<br />

5<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 35 50 100 200 400<br />

µM<br />

0<br />

0 35 50 100 200 400<br />

µM<br />

Bonilla et al. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 92, E-Suppl. 1 (Abstr.) pp. 69 (2009)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentration on<br />

Blastocyst Cell Number<br />

250<br />

Blastocyst<br />

250<br />

Exp<strong>and</strong>ed Blastocyst<br />

200<br />

200<br />

Cell number<br />

150<br />

100<br />

Cell number<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0 35 50 100 200 400<br />

µM<br />

0<br />

0 35 50 100 200 400<br />

µM<br />

Bonilla et al. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 92, E-Suppl. 1 (Abstr.) pp. 69 (2009)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentration on <strong>in</strong> Vitro<br />

Development to Blastocyst <strong>in</strong> Cattle<br />

Blastocyst/oocyte, %<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Day 7<br />

c<br />

c<br />

a,b, c<br />

P < 0.05<br />

bc<br />

bc<br />

Blastocyst/oocyte, %<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

a<br />

b<br />

Day 8<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a,b<br />

P = 0.01<br />

b<br />

b<br />

0<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

µM<br />

0<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

µM<br />

Bonilla et al. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 92, E-Suppl. 1 (Abstr.) pp. 69 (2009)


Effect <strong>of</strong> Methion<strong>in</strong>e Concentration on Glutathione<br />

Concentration <strong>and</strong> % <strong>of</strong> Advanced Blastocyst<br />

Glutathione, pMol on d 7<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Glutathione on D 7<br />

a<br />

a,b<br />

P < 0.005<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

µM<br />

Advanced Blastocyst, %<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Day 7<br />

a,b, c<br />

P < 0.001<br />

c<br />

bc bc<br />

bc<br />

b<br />

a<br />

0 7 14 21 28 35<br />

µM<br />

Bonilla et al. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 92, E-Suppl. 1 (Abstr.) pp. 69 (2009)


Metabolic fates <strong>of</strong> arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> mammalian cells<br />

Wu <strong>and</strong> Morris Jr. Biochem. J. (1998) 336, 1-17


NO <strong>and</strong> Polyam<strong>in</strong>es Enhance Angiogenesis <strong>and</strong><br />

are Potent Vasodilator <strong>in</strong> the Lungs <strong>and</strong> Placenta<br />

• Increase blood flow<br />

<strong>and</strong> nutrient supply<br />

to the fetus (Sladek<br />

et al., 1997)<br />

• Reverse some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e<br />

growth<br />

retardation <strong>in</strong><br />

humans <strong>and</strong> sheep<br />

(de Boo et al. 2005;<br />

Thureen et al., 2002)


Approximate Embryonic <strong>and</strong> Fetal Losses<br />

When Calv<strong>in</strong>g Rate is 30%<br />

100<br />

80<br />

10-15%<br />

fertilization<br />

failure<br />

25% <strong>of</strong> the pregnancies<br />

are lost after placentation<br />

Two-cell Bov<strong>in</strong>e Embryo<br />

Embryo<br />

Cow<br />

Number<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON<br />

--Genetic <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />

--Non-genetic <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />

(from egg & sperm)<br />

--Environment<br />

57%<br />

early<br />

embryo<br />

mortality 15%<br />

late<br />

embryo<br />

mortality<br />

10%<br />

fetal loss<br />

AI Fertilization Day 28 Day 45 Term<br />

US<br />

Palpation


Calcium-Independent iNOS Activity <strong>in</strong> Mur<strong>in</strong>e Placenta<br />

on Different Days <strong>of</strong> Gestation<br />

Baylis et al. Mol. Human Reprod. vol.5 pp. 277–286, 1999


In Situ Hybridization for Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS)<br />

mRNA <strong>in</strong> Human Placenta<br />

A<br />

B<br />

A = sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the syncytioblast <strong>and</strong> cytotrophoblast<br />

B = negative control<br />

C = light photomicroscopy <strong>of</strong> a placental arteriole<br />

D = dark photomicroscopy <strong>of</strong> a placental arteriole<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Baylis et al. Mol. Human Reprod. vol.5 pp. 277–286, 1999


In Situ Hybridization for Cationic AA Transporter <strong>in</strong><br />

Ov<strong>in</strong>e Endometrium


Effect <strong>of</strong> Daily Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e i.v. Infusion on Progesterone <strong>and</strong><br />

Ovarian Artery Resistance Index<br />

Progesterone, ng/mL<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

AUC: P < 0.004<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

Control<br />

Resistance <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

P < 0.05<br />

1<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15<br />

Day <strong>of</strong> the cycle<br />

0<br />

Control<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>fused at 27 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> BW from estrus to d 15<br />

Luther et al. unpublished


Number <strong>of</strong> CL <strong>and</strong> Fetuses <strong>in</strong> Ewes Treated<br />

or Not with i.v. Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

Number per ewe<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Control<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

P < 0.05 P < 0.03<br />

0.0<br />

CL D 25 D 45<br />

Luther et al. unpublished


Number <strong>of</strong> CL <strong>and</strong> Fetuses <strong>in</strong> Sows Fed a Diet<br />

with 1% Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

Number or Kg<br />

18.0<br />

15.0<br />

12.0<br />

9.0<br />

6.0<br />

3.0<br />

Control<br />

Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

P < 0.05<br />

P < 0.05<br />

0.0<br />

Piglets/liter Live/liter Liter birth weight<br />

Mateo et al. J. Nutr. 137: 652-656 (2007)


Summary<br />

• Glyc<strong>in</strong>e is the ma<strong>in</strong> am<strong>in</strong>o acid <strong>in</strong> the reproductive tract <strong>of</strong><br />

bov<strong>in</strong>e<br />

– Energy source for the early embryo; synthesis <strong>of</strong> other AA; tissue deposition<br />

• Arg<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

– Might mediate improvements <strong>in</strong> CL function <strong>and</strong> placentation through gaseous<br />

signal<strong>in</strong>g, angiogenesis <strong>and</strong> blood flow<br />

• Methion<strong>in</strong>e<br />

– Tissue deposition<br />

– Phospholipid synthesis<br />

– DNA methylation<br />

– Concentrations <strong>in</strong> the oviduct <strong>and</strong> endometrium seem adequate for optimum<br />

early embryo development


THANK YOU<br />

José Eduardo P. Santos<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Sciences<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Florida<br />

Jepsantos@ufl.edu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!