01.11.2014 Views

International assessments of the vulnerability.pdf - Climate ...

International assessments of the vulnerability.pdf - Climate ...

International assessments of the vulnerability.pdf - Climate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>assessments</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coastal zone to climate change, including an Australian perspective<br />

The IPCC report indicated that rates <strong>of</strong> sea-level rise will be variable at <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

and local scales. The details <strong>of</strong> this variation are largely unknown; global climate<br />

models do enable some aspects <strong>of</strong> regional variation in sea-level to be modelled, but<br />

regional projections are not yet available and local projections are largely impossible.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> effects on several nations indicates that <strong>the</strong> likely impacts <strong>of</strong> sea-level<br />

rise can vary from country to country and from one geomorphic setting to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

(Biljsma et al., 1996). Certain geomorphic settings are more vulnerable than o<strong>the</strong>rs,<br />

for example, deltas, small islands and most particularly low-lying coral atolls are<br />

especially vulnerable. Coastal wetlands appear to be threatened with loss or<br />

significant change in most locations as <strong>the</strong>ir present location is intimately linked with<br />

present sea level, although <strong>the</strong>ir ability to respond dynamically to such changes by<br />

sedimentation and biomass production needs to be carefully considered (French et al.,<br />

1995). Urbanised sandy coasts may also be vulnerable if development is concentrated<br />

too close to <strong>the</strong> shoreline, primarily due to <strong>the</strong> large costs <strong>of</strong> maintaining a sandy<br />

beach for both recreation and protective purposes (Nicholls and Lowe, 2004). These<br />

costs are <strong>of</strong>ten highly uncertain.<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> embraces: (1) <strong>the</strong> physical and socio-economic<br />

susceptibility to global climate change and (2) <strong>the</strong> ability to cope with <strong>the</strong>se<br />

consequences (i.e. susceptible countries or areas may not be vulnerable). The IPCC<br />

developed a Common Methodology (CM) to provide a better understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

societal <strong>vulnerability</strong> to climate changes, particularly sea-level rise (IPCC CZMS,<br />

1992; IPCC, 1994). This CM procedure is examined in section 4.1.1.<br />

3.2.2 What IPCC says about Australia<br />

Although sea-level projections imply minor differences in <strong>the</strong> extreme estimates, <strong>the</strong><br />

broad range <strong>of</strong> expected average sea-level rise by <strong>the</strong> year 2100 is in <strong>the</strong> range 0.1-0.9<br />

m, with a mean <strong>of</strong> 0.5 m (IPCC, 2001b; NCCOE, 2004). For <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Australian coast, it appears appropriate to adopt this projected sea-level rise. Several<br />

coupled atmosphere-ocean Global <strong>Climate</strong> Models (including <strong>the</strong> CSIRO model)<br />

suggest Australia will experience a slightly lower value than <strong>the</strong> global average. This<br />

increase in sea level is less than <strong>the</strong> current vertical range over which <strong>the</strong> tide varies<br />

around most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Australian coast. It is also less than <strong>the</strong> height reached by <strong>the</strong> sea<br />

during <strong>the</strong> Holocene highstand around 6000 years ago around many parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Australian coast. These two comparisons serve to emphasise <strong>the</strong> challenges ahead in<br />

discriminating between <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> sea-level change from <strong>the</strong> natural variability that<br />

already exists, and that which is likely to be experienced. For example, it has not<br />

been possible to establish <strong>the</strong> elevation <strong>of</strong> sea level 6000 years ago in many <strong>of</strong> those<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> Australia that have a large tidal range because many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proxy indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

sea level do not permit a clear discrimination <strong>of</strong> different tidal levels.<br />

IPCC has also carried out several studies in individual developing countries, such as<br />

Mongolia, India, Kenya, China, Senegal, Brazil, Ukraine, Uganda, Mexico, Baltic<br />

States, <strong>the</strong> Caribbean Islands, Thailand, Sierra Leone and South Pacific (Tuvalu). No<br />

IPCC country study <strong>of</strong> this type has been undertaken in Australia; <strong>the</strong> greater<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> detailed population and economic data, and sophisticated topographic,<br />

remote sensing and o<strong>the</strong>r datasets, suggest that Australia has <strong>the</strong> capacity as a<br />

provider ra<strong>the</strong>r than a recipient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se types <strong>of</strong> <strong>assessments</strong>.<br />

Australian Greenhouse Office, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Environment and Heritage, 2006<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!