02.11.2014 Views

Review of ICE Detainee Tracking Process - Office of Inspector ...

Review of ICE Detainee Tracking Process - Office of Inspector ...

Review of ICE Detainee Tracking Process - Office of Inspector ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2 <br />

Piedmont Billing Errors <br />

<strong>Detainee</strong> Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> Days<br />

Daily<br />

Rate<br />

Total<br />

Overcharge<br />

1 24 46.25 $1,110<br />

2 8 46.25 $370<br />

3 24 46.25 $1,110<br />

4 28 46.25 $1,295<br />

5 62 46.25 $2,868<br />

6 26 46.25 $1,203<br />

7 28 46.25 $1,295<br />

8 8 46.25 $370<br />

Total 208 46.25 $9,620<br />

The Piedmont detention facility also failed to charge <strong>ICE</strong> for two detainees<br />

who were in custody for 36 days. This resulted in a $1,665 undercharge.<br />

There is no <strong>ICE</strong> policy requiring reconciliations; however, the field <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

visited have established their own policies. They record information on new<br />

detainees or update information on transferred detainees on the day <strong>of</strong> the<br />

arrival, or the next business day for detainees received at the facility after<br />

normal working hours, on weekends, or on holidays. For example, entries for<br />

detainees arriving after hours on a Friday evening could be delayed up to three<br />

days. <strong>ICE</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials stated that DACS should be reconciled to the detention<br />

facility list on a regular basis. The El Paso and Chicago field <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

reconciled daily, while the Washington field <strong>of</strong>fices reconciled weekly and<br />

Phoenix monthly. <strong>ICE</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials at three locations stated that they compare<br />

DACS data to the number <strong>of</strong> detainees in custody per detention facility<br />

records, such as billing documents, prior to approving detention facility bills<br />

for payments. The fourth field <strong>of</strong>fice reconciled the number <strong>of</strong> detainees<br />

billed to DACS without verifying detainee identities.<br />

The field <strong>of</strong>fices did not consistently follow these policies because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

numerous detainee movements. In addition, IEAs responsible for entering<br />

detainee data in DACS are not notified <strong>of</strong> detainee activity, i.e., aliens taken<br />

into custody or transferred between facilities, performed by other <strong>ICE</strong><br />

personnel. At locations such as the contract facilities, there were a large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> detainees and numerous moves between locations. The<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s <br />

<strong>Detainee</strong> <strong>Tracking</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <br />

Page 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!