Review of ICE Detainee Tracking Process - Office of Inspector ...
Review of ICE Detainee Tracking Process - Office of Inspector ...
Review of ICE Detainee Tracking Process - Office of Inspector ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 2 <br />
Piedmont Billing Errors <br />
<strong>Detainee</strong> Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> Days<br />
Daily<br />
Rate<br />
Total<br />
Overcharge<br />
1 24 46.25 $1,110<br />
2 8 46.25 $370<br />
3 24 46.25 $1,110<br />
4 28 46.25 $1,295<br />
5 62 46.25 $2,868<br />
6 26 46.25 $1,203<br />
7 28 46.25 $1,295<br />
8 8 46.25 $370<br />
Total 208 46.25 $9,620<br />
The Piedmont detention facility also failed to charge <strong>ICE</strong> for two detainees<br />
who were in custody for 36 days. This resulted in a $1,665 undercharge.<br />
There is no <strong>ICE</strong> policy requiring reconciliations; however, the field <strong>of</strong>fices<br />
visited have established their own policies. They record information on new<br />
detainees or update information on transferred detainees on the day <strong>of</strong> the<br />
arrival, or the next business day for detainees received at the facility after<br />
normal working hours, on weekends, or on holidays. For example, entries for<br />
detainees arriving after hours on a Friday evening could be delayed up to three<br />
days. <strong>ICE</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials stated that DACS should be reconciled to the detention<br />
facility list on a regular basis. The El Paso and Chicago field <strong>of</strong>fices<br />
reconciled daily, while the Washington field <strong>of</strong>fices reconciled weekly and<br />
Phoenix monthly. <strong>ICE</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials at three locations stated that they compare<br />
DACS data to the number <strong>of</strong> detainees in custody per detention facility<br />
records, such as billing documents, prior to approving detention facility bills<br />
for payments. The fourth field <strong>of</strong>fice reconciled the number <strong>of</strong> detainees<br />
billed to DACS without verifying detainee identities.<br />
The field <strong>of</strong>fices did not consistently follow these policies because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
numerous detainee movements. In addition, IEAs responsible for entering<br />
detainee data in DACS are not notified <strong>of</strong> detainee activity, i.e., aliens taken<br />
into custody or transferred between facilities, performed by other <strong>ICE</strong><br />
personnel. At locations such as the contract facilities, there were a large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> detainees and numerous moves between locations. The<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s <br />
<strong>Detainee</strong> <strong>Tracking</strong> <strong>Process</strong> <br />
Page 5