03.11.2014 Views

02d Hydrant Flow Test Report_20120601.pdf

02d Hydrant Flow Test Report_20120601.pdf

02d Hydrant Flow Test Report_20120601.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

June 1, 2012<br />

Claire Tsai-Ochs, Program Operations<br />

New Jersey Schools Development Authority<br />

One West State Street, P.O. Box 991<br />

Trenton NJ 08625-0991<br />

Re:<br />

Fire <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Test</strong> for the Proposed Redshaw School<br />

City of New Brunswick, Middlesex County, New Jersey<br />

Dear Ms. Tsai-Ochs:<br />

On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, Dewberry performed a fire flow test for the referenced project. The purpose<br />

of the test was to establish the available water flow and pressure for the proposed school. In order to<br />

achieve the required pressure drop, we flowed 3 hydrants simultaneously that were located at<br />

Livingston Avenue & Comstock Street (<strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong> #1), Lee Avenue & Delavan Street (<strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong><br />

#2), Remsen Avenue & Comstock Street (<strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong> #3) as shown on the attached water utility map.<br />

Based on the results of the flow test, it was determined that up to approximately 7,000 gallons per<br />

minute (GPM) of flow can be delivered at a residual pressure of 20 PSI to the proposed school from the<br />

16-inch City of New Brunswick water main located along Comstock Street.<br />

Should there be any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact me at<br />

jfloystrop@dewberry.com or 973.576. 9688.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Dewberry<br />

James A. Floystrop, PE, CME<br />

Associate<br />

Enc.<br />

cc:<br />

Corey Nachshen, Dewberry<br />

50053499 Chrono File (all w/ enc.)<br />

Q:\50053499\Tech\Fire <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Test</strong>\2012-06-01 <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Test</strong> Letter.docx


FLOW TEST REPORT & CALCULATIONS<br />

Date of <strong>Test</strong>: 5/29/2012<br />

Time of <strong>Test</strong>:<br />

11:00 AM<br />

<strong>Test</strong> By: Daniel Rocha, Justin Fraser, David Revette, Eric Messina &<br />

New Brunswick Water Utility<br />

Location of<br />

<strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong>:<br />

Livingston Ave & Comstock St (<strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong> #1), Lee Ave & Delavan<br />

St (<strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong> #2), Remsen Ave & Comstock St (<strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong> #3)<br />

Location of<br />

Residual <strong>Hydrant</strong>: Comstock & Lee Ave<br />

Size of Water Main:<br />

16 Inches<br />

TEST DATA: <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong> #1<br />

Diameter of Nozzle:<br />

Pitot Pressure:<br />

4.25 Inches<br />

14 PSI<br />

0.9 for smooth and rounded<br />

0.8 for square and sharp<br />

0.7 for square and sharp with<br />

projection into barrel<br />

Q = 29.8 x C d x D 2 x P 0.5<br />

Outlet Nozzle<br />

Coefficient: 0.90 Where:<br />

Q = <strong>Flow</strong> in gallons per minute<br />

<strong>Flow</strong>: 1,813 GPM D = Diameter of Nozzle in inches<br />

P = Pitot Pressure (PSI)<br />

C d = Outlet Nozzle Coefficient<br />

TEST DATA: <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong> #2<br />

Diameter of Nozzle:<br />

Pitot Pressure:<br />

2.50 Inches<br />

13 PSI<br />

Outlet Nozzle<br />

Coefficient: 0.90<br />

<strong>Flow</strong>:<br />

604 GPM


TEST DATA: <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Hydrant</strong> #3<br />

Diameter of Nozzle:<br />

Pitot Pressure:<br />

2.50 Inches<br />

35 PSI<br />

Outlet Nozzle<br />

Coefficient: 0.80<br />

<strong>Flow</strong>:<br />

881 GPM<br />

TEST DATA: Residual <strong>Hydrant</strong><br />

Static Pressure:<br />

Residual Pressure:<br />

Total <strong>Flow</strong>:<br />

61 PSI<br />

51 PSI<br />

3,298 GPM<br />

PROJECTED AVAILABLE FLOW<br />

= h 0.54<br />

0.54<br />

h <br />

Q R = flow predicted at desired residual pressure (desired residual pressure = 20 PSI)<br />

Q F = total flow measured during test<br />

h r = pressure drop to desired residual pressure (Static Pressure - 20 PSI)<br />

h f = pressure drop measured during test (Static Pressure - Residual Pressure)<br />

Q R =<br />

Q F =<br />

h r =<br />

h f =<br />

7,067 GPM<br />

3,298 GPM<br />

41 PSI<br />

10 PSI<br />

Approximately 7,000 GPM of flow should be available at a residual pressure of 20 PSI<br />

when rounded down to the nearest 250 GPM.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!