03.11.2014 Views

Contra Costa Lawyer - Contra Costa County Bar Association

Contra Costa Lawyer - Contra Costa County Bar Association

Contra Costa Lawyer - Contra Costa County Bar Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hon. <strong>Bar</strong>ry P. Goode<br />

Supervising Judge<br />

civil law<br />

In the judicial branch, change is<br />

generally slow but inexorable. So<br />

it has been with the Civil Division<br />

this year. There have been a few<br />

changes in recent months, but much has<br />

stayed the same. As of January 2010,<br />

Judge Flinn left the complex civil department<br />

and Judge Maddock left his<br />

fast track department, each after three<br />

years of dedicated service. They will be<br />

missed.<br />

Judge Cheryl Mills now sits in what<br />

had been Judge Maddock’s department.<br />

Judge Goode occupies the complex civil<br />

department. In all other respects, the<br />

assignments remain the same. Judges<br />

Craddick, Zuniga and Baskin continue<br />

to serve in fast track civil departments.<br />

Commissioner Sanders still does her<br />

extraordinary work with discovery motions,<br />

ex parte applications, orders of<br />

examinations, name changes and the<br />

myriad of other things she handles.<br />

However, as described elsewhere in<br />

this magazine, in just a few more months<br />

Judges Craddick and Zuniga will move<br />

on to new assignments. They will be replaced<br />

by Judges Brady and Austin. The<br />

division is lucky to have had the benefit<br />

of two such experienced judges and is<br />

equally lucky to be getting two seasoned<br />

judicial officers to replace them.<br />

There has been one other noticeable<br />

change this year. In January 2010, the<br />

Court divided the work of the limited<br />

jurisdiction civil department among the<br />

other civil departments. So, now each of<br />

the five unlimited civil departments has<br />

a portfolio of limited jurisdiction cases<br />

as well. That means that at 8:30 a.m.<br />

(most mornings) the fast track and complex<br />

civil departments call a calendar of<br />

up to a dozen limited cases. It also means<br />

that from time to time they have trials of<br />

limited jurisdiction matters.<br />

The merger of the limited civil caseload<br />

with the unlimited civil caseload<br />

during this time of budget woes has<br />

created strains in the clerk’s office. The<br />

Court’s staff has shrunk by approximately<br />

20% since the beginning of the<br />

current budget crisis – with commensurate<br />

reductions in the Civil Division.<br />

With fewer clerks to process papers, the<br />

unlimited civil cases have gotten priority<br />

attention to the detriment of the limited<br />

cases. Thus, defaults, writs and abstracts,<br />

new complaints and loose filings have<br />

become seriously backlogged. The Court<br />

has devised a plan to address that backlog<br />

and will, hopefully, have it cleared by<br />

late September or early October. No one<br />

likes having this backlog, and we are all<br />

looking forward to having it eliminated.<br />

We appreciate the great effort that all<br />

our staff has made to try to keep up with<br />

a truly overwhelming workload.<br />

Other changes are more subtle. For<br />

example, in the complex department,<br />

trials are now scheduled in the mornings<br />

as well as the afternoons. And Department<br />

19 is trying an experiment in recalendaring<br />

trials. If the parties agree<br />

that their case will be ready for trial in<br />

the next thirty to sixty days, they can<br />

contact the clerk. The Court will try to<br />

get them on calendar in lieu of a case<br />

that was previously set but has settled.<br />

Of course settlement is still very important.<br />

We are fortunate to have the active<br />

assistance of the CCCBA which – together<br />

with Magda Lopez - is the engine<br />

that drives our alternate dispute resolution<br />

program. With their assistance, we<br />

were able to dispose of more than a thousand<br />

cases last year. We are on track to<br />

hit that number again this year.<br />

Although great attention is rightfully<br />

paid to alternate dispute resolution, and<br />

although much has been written about<br />

the demise of civil trials, that death has<br />

been much overstated. Indeed, as of this<br />

writing, four of the five civil departments<br />

are in the middle of trial. One department<br />

has been in trial two thirds of the<br />

time this year.<br />

Two years ago, writing in these pages,<br />

Judge Flinn discussed the use of e-filing<br />

in the complex civil department. He explained<br />

its benefits and looked forward<br />

to expanding its use to other unlimited<br />

civil cases and even some types of limited<br />

jurisdiction matters. He said “we<br />

are now very close to making e-filing<br />

available for all unlimited civil actions...”<br />

That was before the bottom dropped out<br />

of the budget. However, it is still a goal<br />

to be pursued once the budget situation<br />

improves. It seems inevitable that we<br />

will someday swap electrons for ink and<br />

paper. Change is, after all, inexorable, albeit<br />

slow. u<br />

10 September 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!