Contra Costa Lawyer - Contra Costa County Bar Association
Contra Costa Lawyer - Contra Costa County Bar Association
Contra Costa Lawyer - Contra Costa County Bar Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Hon. <strong>Bar</strong>ry P. Goode<br />
Supervising Judge<br />
civil law<br />
In the judicial branch, change is<br />
generally slow but inexorable. So<br />
it has been with the Civil Division<br />
this year. There have been a few<br />
changes in recent months, but much has<br />
stayed the same. As of January 2010,<br />
Judge Flinn left the complex civil department<br />
and Judge Maddock left his<br />
fast track department, each after three<br />
years of dedicated service. They will be<br />
missed.<br />
Judge Cheryl Mills now sits in what<br />
had been Judge Maddock’s department.<br />
Judge Goode occupies the complex civil<br />
department. In all other respects, the<br />
assignments remain the same. Judges<br />
Craddick, Zuniga and Baskin continue<br />
to serve in fast track civil departments.<br />
Commissioner Sanders still does her<br />
extraordinary work with discovery motions,<br />
ex parte applications, orders of<br />
examinations, name changes and the<br />
myriad of other things she handles.<br />
However, as described elsewhere in<br />
this magazine, in just a few more months<br />
Judges Craddick and Zuniga will move<br />
on to new assignments. They will be replaced<br />
by Judges Brady and Austin. The<br />
division is lucky to have had the benefit<br />
of two such experienced judges and is<br />
equally lucky to be getting two seasoned<br />
judicial officers to replace them.<br />
There has been one other noticeable<br />
change this year. In January 2010, the<br />
Court divided the work of the limited<br />
jurisdiction civil department among the<br />
other civil departments. So, now each of<br />
the five unlimited civil departments has<br />
a portfolio of limited jurisdiction cases<br />
as well. That means that at 8:30 a.m.<br />
(most mornings) the fast track and complex<br />
civil departments call a calendar of<br />
up to a dozen limited cases. It also means<br />
that from time to time they have trials of<br />
limited jurisdiction matters.<br />
The merger of the limited civil caseload<br />
with the unlimited civil caseload<br />
during this time of budget woes has<br />
created strains in the clerk’s office. The<br />
Court’s staff has shrunk by approximately<br />
20% since the beginning of the<br />
current budget crisis – with commensurate<br />
reductions in the Civil Division.<br />
With fewer clerks to process papers, the<br />
unlimited civil cases have gotten priority<br />
attention to the detriment of the limited<br />
cases. Thus, defaults, writs and abstracts,<br />
new complaints and loose filings have<br />
become seriously backlogged. The Court<br />
has devised a plan to address that backlog<br />
and will, hopefully, have it cleared by<br />
late September or early October. No one<br />
likes having this backlog, and we are all<br />
looking forward to having it eliminated.<br />
We appreciate the great effort that all<br />
our staff has made to try to keep up with<br />
a truly overwhelming workload.<br />
Other changes are more subtle. For<br />
example, in the complex department,<br />
trials are now scheduled in the mornings<br />
as well as the afternoons. And Department<br />
19 is trying an experiment in recalendaring<br />
trials. If the parties agree<br />
that their case will be ready for trial in<br />
the next thirty to sixty days, they can<br />
contact the clerk. The Court will try to<br />
get them on calendar in lieu of a case<br />
that was previously set but has settled.<br />
Of course settlement is still very important.<br />
We are fortunate to have the active<br />
assistance of the CCCBA which – together<br />
with Magda Lopez - is the engine<br />
that drives our alternate dispute resolution<br />
program. With their assistance, we<br />
were able to dispose of more than a thousand<br />
cases last year. We are on track to<br />
hit that number again this year.<br />
Although great attention is rightfully<br />
paid to alternate dispute resolution, and<br />
although much has been written about<br />
the demise of civil trials, that death has<br />
been much overstated. Indeed, as of this<br />
writing, four of the five civil departments<br />
are in the middle of trial. One department<br />
has been in trial two thirds of the<br />
time this year.<br />
Two years ago, writing in these pages,<br />
Judge Flinn discussed the use of e-filing<br />
in the complex civil department. He explained<br />
its benefits and looked forward<br />
to expanding its use to other unlimited<br />
civil cases and even some types of limited<br />
jurisdiction matters. He said “we<br />
are now very close to making e-filing<br />
available for all unlimited civil actions...”<br />
That was before the bottom dropped out<br />
of the budget. However, it is still a goal<br />
to be pursued once the budget situation<br />
improves. It seems inevitable that we<br />
will someday swap electrons for ink and<br />
paper. Change is, after all, inexorable, albeit<br />
slow. u<br />
10 September 2010