03.11.2014 Views

Revised Tourism Strategy for uThungulu District Municipality Final

Revised Tourism Strategy for uThungulu District Municipality Final

Revised Tourism Strategy for uThungulu District Municipality Final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>Final</strong><br />

Report NO. 09/03<br />

December 2009<br />

Report Prepared by:<br />

Report No. 09/03 <strong>Final</strong><br />

Draft Date Author Checked Status Approved<br />

1 10 December 2009 GMA GAM <strong>Final</strong><br />

2 10 February 2010 GMA GAM <strong>Final</strong><br />

3 21 April 2011 GMA GAM <strong>Revised</strong>-<strong>Final</strong><br />

KEYWORDS: <strong>Tourism</strong>; <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>; Richards Bay; Eshowe; Mtunzini; Ongoye; Inkandla; Ntongeneni; Melmoth


Contents<br />

Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3<br />

Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 8<br />

Section 1: <strong>Tourism</strong> Vision <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> ......................................................................................... 9<br />

1.1 5 Key Objectives of <strong>Tourism</strong> Development in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> .............................................. 11<br />

Section 2: Review of 2003 <strong>Tourism</strong> Plan Projects ....................................................................................... 14<br />

Section 3: <strong>Tourism</strong> Product and Infrastructure <strong>Strategy</strong> ............................................................................ 26<br />

3.1 Ten Product and Infrastructure Strategies <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> .......................................................... 28<br />

3.2. Nodal <strong>Tourism</strong> Development <strong>Strategy</strong> ........................................................................................ 59<br />

3.3. Emergency Services <strong>for</strong> Tourists ................................................................................................. 67<br />

Section 4: Deriving Local Benefit from <strong>Tourism</strong> Development ................................................................... 69<br />

4.1 <strong>Strategy</strong> 1 - Expanding the <strong>Tourism</strong> Skills Base........................................................................... 70<br />

4.2 <strong>Strategy</strong> 2 - <strong>Tourism</strong> SMME and Supply Chain Development <strong>Strategy</strong> ...................................... 71<br />

4.3 <strong>Strategy</strong> 3 - A Framework <strong>for</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> Development on Community Owned Land ................... 75<br />

Section 5: Business Plans ............................................................................................................................ 77<br />

Section 6: Per<strong>for</strong>mance Management ........................................................................................................ 95<br />

6.1. Service Excellence Award System ............................................................................................... 95<br />

6.2. Future research projects to measure growth in the local tourism industry ............................. 100<br />

6.3. Monitoring and Evaluation ....................................................................................................... 102<br />

Appendix A – Maps and Images ................................................................................................................ 105<br />

Appendix B – Policy and Legislation .......................................................................................................... 111<br />

Appendix C –List of Possible Emergency Scenarios .................................................................................. 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Executive Summary<br />

The <strong>Tourism</strong> Master Plan Review <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is an outcome of extensive research<br />

undertaken in the context of current relevant tourism policy and legislation (see appendix) on the<br />

current state of tourism in the district as well as a critical assessment of the tourism strategies<br />

highlighted in the 2003 <strong>Tourism</strong> Master Plan. The 2003 <strong>Tourism</strong> Master Plan had become outdated and<br />

certain strategies identified in the earlier master plan are no longer applicable to the post 2010 period.<br />

In order to guide tourism development in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>for</strong> the next five to ten years, leading up to<br />

and beyond the 2010 Soccer World Cup, a new vision <strong>for</strong> developing tourism in the district is articulated<br />

in the updated master plan.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Vision <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> (Part 1)<br />

To develop and market holistic tourism products that utilise the competitive advantages<br />

that <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> enjoys in ecological/wildlife and cultural/heritage attractions in<br />

such a way as to appeal to a broad, and international in scope, tourism market, creating<br />

new flows of tourists in the region and also capturing a substantial share of the existing<br />

tourism trade which currently passes through the district.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Vision <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> (Part 2)<br />

To ensure that tourism contributes toward local economic development though the active<br />

involvement of communities in tourism projects and the strengthening of linkages with the<br />

SMME Sector.<br />

Achieving Part 1 of the <strong>Tourism</strong> Vision<br />

Some of the key features of this vision <strong>for</strong> tourism development in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> include:<br />

<br />

The emphasis on the district’s comparative/competitive advantages as being a key driver <strong>for</strong><br />

tourism growth in the district;<br />

Page 3 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

<br />

<br />

The importance of capitalising on existing flows of tourists passing through the district; the need<br />

to also develop new tourist flows; and<br />

An enhanced focus on the international tourist market.<br />

Increasing tourist flows and extending tourist durations of stay in the district must, necessarily, entail an<br />

improvement and an extension of the tourist product/s offered by the district. The tourism product<br />

and infrastructure strategies outlined in this master plan incorporate both general product strategies<br />

which set the foundations <strong>for</strong> the growth of tourism in the district and specific tourism projects which<br />

are expected to catalyse growth in specific tourism sectors in the district.<br />

Ten general product and infrastructure strategies <strong>for</strong> growing tourism in <strong>uThungulu</strong> are identified. Each<br />

of the strategies listed in table E1, are a reflection of the findings of the SWOT and Gap Analysis as well<br />

as the Status Quo Report <strong>for</strong> tourism in the district.<br />

Table E1 – Summary of General Product and Infrastructure Strategies<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong><br />

Priority Level<br />

1. Develop the Coastline <strong>for</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> Purposes High<br />

2. Pursue the Development of a Big Five Game Reserve in the<br />

High<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

3. Encourage Cruise Ship <strong>Tourism</strong> in Richards Bay Medium/High<br />

4. Extensively Develop the Route 66 Product High<br />

5. Develop the Great Forests of Zululand Experience Medium<br />

6. Develop Contemporary African Cultural <strong>Tourism</strong> Medium<br />

7. Improve Accessibility and Visibility of Existing Attractions High<br />

8. Develop Adventure <strong>Tourism</strong> in the <strong>District</strong> Medium<br />

9. Ensure Tourist Safety in Volatile Areas High<br />

10. Provide More Family-Attractions and Facilities Medium<br />

11. Promote Events in the <strong>District</strong> Medium<br />

A degree of continuity with the previous <strong>Tourism</strong> Master Plan is evident in the identification of<br />

strategies 1 to 4, all of which were, to varying extents, identified as key projects in the previous master<br />

Page 4 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

plan. A nodal tourism strategy further addresses tourism development in some of the areas identified in<br />

the previous master plan.<br />

The tourism strategies identified in Table E1, while general, have a spatial component to them,<br />

identifying areas with high tourism potential. <strong>Tourism</strong> development in a district needs to be mindful of<br />

the fact that some areas have competitive advantages when it comes to tourism while others simply do<br />

not. It is the role of the district municipality to identify areas with high tourism potential that will offer<br />

cross-cutting benefits <strong>for</strong> the entire district, and earmark these areas <strong>for</strong> extensive tourism<br />

development. A nodal tourism strategy provides a spatial context <strong>for</strong> tourism development in the<br />

district, prioritising areas which are expected to have the highest yield <strong>for</strong> investments in tourism.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> development nodes are those areas wherein tourist attractions, facilities and infrastructure<br />

should be clustered. Within these nodes, tourism should be given priority and tourists treated as<br />

valuable commodities. The following nodes have been identified:<br />

Primary Nodes<br />

1. Richards Bay Marina Area and Waterfront<br />

2. Eshowe and surrounding region<br />

3. Mtunzini / Siyaya Coastal Park<br />

4. Mthonjaneni / Dingane Spring<br />

5. Thula Thula/ Royal Zulu<br />

Secondary Nodes<br />

1. Lake Eteza, Umfolozi Village<br />

2. Nkandla/Matshenezimpisi<br />

In addition to the more general product and the nodal development strategies, indicative business plans<br />

were undertaken <strong>for</strong> seven specific tourism projects considered to be catalytic <strong>for</strong> tourism development<br />

in the district. These projects are listed on the following page.<br />

Page 5 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Development of Forest Canopy Tours – The development of canopy tours at either Dlinza Forest;<br />

Entumeni Forest or Mpushini Falls, should stimulate both adventure tourism in the district and<br />

restore some of the waning popularity of Eshowe.<br />

Development of Siyaya Hiking Trail – The trail will run from Umlalazi Nature Reserve to<br />

Amatikulu Nature Reserve and will look to exploit the beauty of this stretch of coastline, in<br />

offering eco-tourists a memorable hiking experience.<br />

Development of Nseleni Conference Centre and Accommodation – Along with the current<br />

upgrade of the conference centre at Nseleni Nature Reserve, accommodation should also be<br />

provided as a means of capturing some of the passing tourist trade on the N2.<br />

Support <strong>for</strong> the Simunye Project – This involves supporting and encouraging this community<br />

project aimed at creating a Big Five Game Reserve which will be linked to Opathe-Emakhosini,<br />

and which will provide the Route 66 with a major international attraction.<br />

Support <strong>for</strong> the Royal Zulu Game Reserve – This involves renewed support and backing <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Royal Zulu Project, spearheaded by Lawrence Anthony and aimed at creating a coterminous<br />

linkage with Hluhluwe-Umfolozi Game Reserve.<br />

Development of a Coastal Resort in the Siyaya Coastal Strip – This project will address the lack<br />

of luxurious coastal resort options (primarily aimed at <strong>for</strong>eign tourists) in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> and,<br />

indeed, in the whole of KwaZulu-Natal.<br />

Development of a Great Forests of Zululand Tour – This project will look to unite all of <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>’s <strong>for</strong>est attractions into one unique tourism experience which will appeal to eco-tourists;<br />

birders and heritage tourists alike.<br />

Achieving Part 2 of the <strong>Tourism</strong> Vision <strong>for</strong> the <strong>District</strong><br />

The second part of the vision <strong>for</strong> tourism in the district concerns the distribution of benefits flowing<br />

from increased tourism activity. A strategy must be <strong>for</strong>mulated to ensure that tourism development<br />

does not simply increase the profit margins of well established private sector tourism-based companies,<br />

but also benefits the local population, whether directly or via a ‘spill-over effect’. There are three ways<br />

in which the benefits of tourism development can be transmitted to local communities.<br />

follows:<br />

These are as<br />

<br />

Local entrepreneurship opportunities<br />

Page 6 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

<br />

<br />

Income derived from community ownership of land or tourism initiatives<br />

Employment opportunities<br />

This master plan identifies three strategies <strong>for</strong> realising the opportunities arising from increased tourism<br />

activity in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>. These are:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> 1 – Expanding the tourism skills base<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> 2 – Development and support <strong>for</strong> tourism SMMEs<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> 3 – Providing an effective framework <strong>for</strong> tourism development on community<br />

owned land<br />

Undertaking these strategies is critical to equitably distributing the benefits arising from increased<br />

tourism development in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

Page 7 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong>, as a stimulant <strong>for</strong> local economic development and job creation underper<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>. This, in the main, is attributable to a relatively low (in comparison to the neighbouring districts<br />

of iLembe, Zululand and Umkhanyakude) tourism footfall in the district. <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is viewed by<br />

tourists, largely, as a ‘drive-through’ destination, en route to attractions in either Zululand or the<br />

Elephant Coast. Low levels of tourism activity, however, do not reflect the true tourism potential of the<br />

district which, in fact, is immense. The problem is not so much a lack of tourism assets as it is one of<br />

insufficient product development and diversification. <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> can legitimately lay claim to<br />

possessing three (namely, Beach; Battlefields and Bush) out of the five (also including Berg and Buzz) top<br />

tourism experiences in the province. None of these experiences and attractions, however, are<br />

sufficiently developed in the district or marketed in a way as to attract significant numbers of tourists to<br />

the district. This document looks to provide a comprehensive product development strategy aimed at<br />

exploiting the tourism potential of the district so as best to capture the local economic development<br />

benefits associated with tourism. Although necessary, product development alone is not a sufficient<br />

condition <strong>for</strong> the success of tourism in a region, and must be supported by a strong marketing strategy,<br />

which includes the branding and positioning of the tourism experience that the district offers.<br />

A tourism strategy was developed <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> in 2003, but has since become outdated. This<br />

strategy aimed to provide guidelines <strong>for</strong> tourism development in the district. More than five years later,<br />

the current strategy reviews the relevance of some of the recommendations made in 2003. The current<br />

strategy also assesses the present status of a number of projects identified in the 2003 strategy<br />

document. Standing on the eve of the 2010 Soccer World Cup, the biggest sporting event ever hosted in<br />

South Africa, a new vision <strong>for</strong> tourism development <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is articulated in this<br />

document, one which is cognisant of the changing trends in the past five years and of the opportunity<br />

that the hosting of the World Cup will provide <strong>for</strong> tourism in the district. This vision will guide tourism<br />

strategies and initiatives in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>for</strong> at least the next 5 years.<br />

In articulating an overall vision and specifying a set of tourism development strategies <strong>for</strong> the district,<br />

this strategy document draws greatly on the ‘Situational Analysis’ and ‘SWOT and Gap Analysis’<br />

Page 8 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

produced by GMA.<br />

document.<br />

This initial research <strong>for</strong>ms the rationale behind the recommendations of this<br />

Section 1: <strong>Tourism</strong> Vision <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

A tourism vision should act as an overriding goal to which all tourism developments and strategies<br />

should work toward achieving. The vision should articulate a view of the future which sees the<br />

realisation of tourism potential and points toward ways of achieving this realisation.<br />

2003 Vision<br />

To create, develop and manage ‘<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’ to become a preferred tourism destination,<br />

<strong>for</strong> both <strong>for</strong>eign and domestic tourists, offering wildlife, cultural and coastal tourism<br />

attractions in an economically and environmentally sustainable manner that will<br />

deliver local socio-economic benefit to all the people of the district.<br />

The vision as articulated in the 2003 tourism development plan is a very broad vision which is still<br />

applicable today but is not unique to <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> in a way that would suggest specific strategies<br />

<strong>for</strong> tourism development. As such a new vision is specified below.<br />

New Vision<br />

To develop and market holistic tourism products that utilise the competitive advantages that<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> enjoys in ecological/wildlife and cultural/heritage attractions in such a way as to<br />

appeal to a broad, and international in scope, tourism market, creating new flows of tourists in the<br />

region and also capturing a substantial share of the existing tourism trade which currently passes<br />

through the district.<br />

and…<br />

To ensure that tourism contributes toward local economic development though the active involvement<br />

of communities in tourism projects and the strengthening of linkages with the SMME Sector.<br />

Page 9 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

The new vision can be decomposed to provide a greater understanding:<br />

<br />

Holistic tourism products: <strong>Tourism</strong> revenue is composed of three principal factors. Namely, the<br />

number of tourists who visit a destination, their duration of stay and their average spend per<br />

day. Product development should seek to increase each one of these factors by providing a<br />

more complete tourist experience. <strong>Tourism</strong> products should be developed which integrate well<br />

with existing products and lead to a clustering of mutually-rein<strong>for</strong>cing attractions and facilities,<br />

such that holistic tourism products are offered.<br />

<br />

Competitive advantages….ecological/wildlife and cultural/heritage: It is essential <strong>for</strong> tourism<br />

development in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> to make use of the district’s competitive advantages, and not<br />

simply superimpose contextually irrelevant tourism initiatives. <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> enjoys<br />

significant advantages over its competitors (advantages derived from the uniqueness of these<br />

attractions) in the areas of ecological/wildlife and cultural/heritage attractions. As such tourism<br />

development should look to further develop and market the uniqueness of these attractions<br />

<br />

Broad and international in scope: <strong>Tourism</strong> in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is dominated by niche markets,<br />

with limited scope <strong>for</strong> extensive expansion. While these markets are valuable, exclusively<br />

targeting these markets offers little in the way of future growth prospects. <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

development in the district must thus also aim to appeal to a broad tourism market by providing<br />

primary, wide appeal attractions. These attractions must also have the ability and quality to<br />

attract the international visitor, who can choose between any number of tourist attractions in<br />

South Africa.<br />

<br />

New flows: While the nature of tourism (predominantly business) in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> means<br />

that average spend per day is relatively low, the main driver of a below average GDP<br />

contribution of tourism <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>, is limited tourist footfall in the district. It is thus<br />

essential to increase the number of tourists visiting <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>. This will necessarily<br />

involve expanding the district’s tourism target market as indicated above.<br />

Page 10 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

<br />

Capturing existing tourism trade: It is important <strong>for</strong> the district to develop tourism products<br />

which create new tourism flows in the region. This is, however, a long term goal. In the short<br />

term the district must look to tap into the lucrative flow of tourists to areas immediately<br />

bordering <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>. These tourists should be encouraged to spend more time in<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e progressing to their intended destinations.<br />

<br />

Active involvement of communities; linkages with the SMME sector: In order to ensure<br />

support <strong>for</strong> tourism projects, and to achieve development aims in the district, the community<br />

must be given a stake in tourism development. This is best achieved by encouraging<br />

partnerships with local SMME’s and community land owners.<br />

1.1 5 Key Objectives of <strong>Tourism</strong> Development in <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Achieving the tourism vision specified in the previous section requires that a number of intermediate<br />

objectives be targeted. These objectives are listed below:<br />

1. Increase tourist footfall in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

2. Appeal to high spending tourist market segments and encourage increased spend<br />

3. Enhance linkages with established tourism attractions in the region<br />

4. Create an easily recognisable tourism brand identity <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

5. Maximise the community benefit of tourism in the district<br />

1. Increase tourist footfall in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Page 11 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

The starting point of any tourism strategy <strong>for</strong> an area with little previous tourism development is to<br />

increase the tourist footfall in that area. <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s tourist footfall (the number of tourists in<br />

the district at any given time), is relatively low and comprised mainly of tourists travelling to the<br />

Elephant Coast, or Business tourists staying in the district <strong>for</strong> work purposes. These two groups tend to<br />

concentrate around the N2 Highway, and in business centres such as Richards Bay, Empangeni and<br />

Eshowe. Remoter areas such as those in Ntambanana, Nkandla and Mthonjaneni, experience very little<br />

tourist footfall. In order to ensure that the benefits of tourism are distributed equitably in the district, it<br />

is essential that development takes places in these remote areas, such that the number of tourists<br />

visiting them increases significantly. Increasing tourist footfall in the district and in the remote areas in<br />

particular, also requires the marketing of tourist routes which link otherwise isolated attractions with<br />

established tourism flows.<br />

2. Appeal to high spending tourist market segments and encourage increased spend<br />

Simply attracting large numbers of tourists does not mean that tourism will contribute substantially to<br />

the district’s economic output. This is because different segments of the tourist market spend widely<br />

different amounts of money while visiting an area, and if the district has large numbers of low spending<br />

tourists this will reflect in lower tourism revenue. <strong>Tourism</strong> in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> can best be described<br />

as largely domestic, with a high degree of business tourism. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately these are relatively low<br />

revenue generating tourist market segments. Thus <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> must, in addition to these<br />

established markets, also look to target high spending markets. An average <strong>for</strong>eign tourist spends up to<br />

eight times a day more than an average domestic tourist, while leisure tourists typically spend more<br />

than business tourists. Foreign tourists are the most price‐inelastic segment of the tourism market and<br />

are willing to pay high prices <strong>for</strong> unique cultural or adventure activities. Both <strong>for</strong>eign tourists and<br />

domestic leisure tourists, however, have to be provided with opportunities to spend within the district.<br />

This entails developing a greater array of tourism products on offer and clustering tourism supporting<br />

industries (restaurants, cinemas, craft shops) around places of accommodation.<br />

3. Enhance linkages with established tourism attractions in the region<br />

Page 12 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is located in one of the most popular tourism regions in KwaZulu-Natal. Hluhluwe-<br />

Umfolozi Game Reserve, the Isimangaliso Wetland Park and the Battlefields of Zululand are all within<br />

close proximity to the district’s borders. These destinations have over a long period established strong<br />

and regular flows of tourists. <strong>Tourism</strong> planning <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> must take into consideration the<br />

broader tourism region because tourists, in making decisions on destinations to visit, will generally look<br />

at the total number of attractions in a region, irrespective of district boundaries.<br />

Thus tourism<br />

development in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> should, as far as possible, complement the existing suite of<br />

attractions available in neighbouring areas. Linkages with tourist areas outside of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

should be strengthened, allowing <strong>for</strong> the movement of tourists between districts and contributing to the<br />

attractiveness of the region as a whole.<br />

4. Create an easily recognisable tourism brand identity <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

While it is important to enhance the linkages between <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> and its neighbours, it is also<br />

essential that <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> has a unique identity, even if it is an identity which sits within the<br />

broader tourism identity <strong>for</strong> the region. The tourism industry aims to bring the’ market to the product’<br />

where most other industries take the ‘product to the market’. Attracting the market (tourists) to the<br />

product (<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s tourist attractions) requires extensive marketing and branding in order to<br />

project a certain image and ‘sense of place’ <strong>for</strong> a destination. Tourists, especially <strong>for</strong>eign tourists who<br />

have an international range of attractions to compare things to, seek unique destinations and neatly<br />

defined experiences. An internationally recognisable brand must be created <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>, one<br />

which guides the expectations of visitors to the district, while at the same time guiding the nature and<br />

style of tourism development in the district. An effective tourism identity <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> should<br />

fit well with the Elephant Coast/Zululand region’s identity but should also be suitably distinguishable,<br />

propagating the notion that a visit to <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is a must <strong>for</strong> tourists visiting northern KwaZulu-<br />

Natal, or, in fact, the province as a whole.<br />

5. Maximise the community benefit of tourism in the district<br />

Page 13 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

The <strong>for</strong>mer objectives concern ef<strong>for</strong>ts to maximise tourism revenue in the district. However, maximising<br />

tourism revenue may have little benefit <strong>for</strong> local communities if tourism development is not oriented<br />

toward providing locals with income-generating opportunities as well as a significant stake in tourism<br />

development. The best way in which the local community can gain from tourism development in the<br />

district is in the creation of jobs. Wherever possible, locals should be trained to participate in the<br />

operation of tourism initiatives. Additionally collaborative partnerships should be <strong>for</strong>med between<br />

private tourism institutions and traditional land owners, in order to achieve sustainable trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

in the district. <strong>Final</strong>ly the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should encourage the participation of SMME’s in the<br />

tourism industry as this will result in multiplier benefits <strong>for</strong> the local population.<br />

Section 2: Review of 2003 <strong>Tourism</strong> Plan Projects<br />

The <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> Development Plan prepared in August 2003 lists a number<br />

of strategic projects which it was felt, at the time, were key to achieving the tourism development<br />

objectives of the municipality, namely:<br />

<br />

Development of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s coastal assets, including Richards Bay and catering <strong>for</strong><br />

primarily the domestic market;<br />

<br />

Development of the region’s rich natural resources including wildlife and catering primarily <strong>for</strong><br />

the <strong>for</strong>eign market; and<br />

<br />

Integration and interpretation of cultural and historical assets providing <strong>for</strong> primarily <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

markets but with added value <strong>for</strong> the domestic market.<br />

(Halley Sharpe, 2003)<br />

This chapter reviews those projects and assesses their success where possible.<br />

1. RICHARDS BAY WATERFRONT & COASTAL TOURISM PRODUCT<br />

Page 14 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

The waterfront at Richards Bay has received some significant investment in recent years and the<br />

addition of a Protea Hotel on the waterfront must be seen as a key success in the area. This together<br />

with the opening of additional restaurants along the waterfront has changed the nature and feel of the<br />

area and provided both residents and tourists with a more significant recreational node away from the<br />

industrial heart of Richards Bay.<br />

The strategic intents (Halley Sharpe, 2003) of this development were <strong>for</strong> the:<br />

The re-branding of Richards Bay as a waterfront and beach tourism destination rather than the present<br />

industrial centre<br />

The Tuzi Gazi brand is the key to this re-branding exercise and some success has been achieved with<br />

this. The area is a natural draw card <strong>for</strong> visitors. However, there is a long way to go be<strong>for</strong>e people’s<br />

perceptions of Richards Bay as primarily an industrial centre are overcome.<br />

Offer an incentive through the offer of a quality lifestyle, <strong>for</strong> companies to relocate to Richards Bay;<br />

The popularity of the Tuzi Gazi area as a residential neighbourhood has seen a number of houses located<br />

on the waterfront and it is likely that more residential development will occur in the area in the future.<br />

The building and occupation of luxury houses on the waterfront have helped change the image of the<br />

area. Current plans by developers to develop adjacent land owned by the municipality, including Pelican<br />

Island must be taken as a clear sign of the positive perception of the Richards Bay waterfront as a<br />

development node <strong>for</strong> residential and recreational use.<br />

Create day visitor resort type attractions and contribute to higher bed occupancies at existing and new<br />

tourism establishments in Richards Bay<br />

This has not been achieved as of yet. Whilst there are restaurants and boat trips from the dock, very<br />

little else has been achieved. The public perception that it is not safe to walk from Tuzi Gazi to<br />

Alkantstrand is testimony to this.<br />

Page 15 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Assist in trans<strong>for</strong>ming the image of the wider district to that of a tourism destination drawing on<br />

significant scenic appeal<br />

The waterfront has gone a long way to achieving these objectives, however, a number of issues still<br />

need to be addressed. The entire area from Tuzi Gazi to Alkantstrand needs to be managed as a single<br />

tourism precinct where the safety of all visitors is guaranteed on a 24/7 basis. The Naval Island and<br />

Pelican Island areas have still not received any <strong>for</strong>m of development despite being huge potential draw<br />

cards. In the case of the latter, an extensive Marina Development <strong>Strategy</strong> drafted by Mhlatuze<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> aims to use the unique appeal of Pelican Island in developing a mixed-use residential and<br />

entertainment node incorporating Pelican Island, the Yacht Club and Alkantstrand Beach. The loss of<br />

Blue Flag status <strong>for</strong> Alkantstrand Beach is a major setback to the tourist appeal of the area and should<br />

be addressed as a matter of urgency (see Section 3.1 <strong>Strategy</strong> 1)<br />

Encourage longer stays by cruise ships stopping over in Richards Bay<br />

The strategic intent of getting cruise liner passengers to stay on in Richards Bay <strong>for</strong> longer has not been<br />

achieved. Currently cruise liner tourists still tend to head <strong>for</strong> the game reserves and cultural attractions<br />

distant from Richards Bay and do not spend time around the waterfront area. This objective was<br />

probably somewhat misguided. Few cruise liners stay in port <strong>for</strong> more than 24 hours. A more pertinent<br />

objective would have been to encourage the arrival of more cruise liners rather than trying to prolong<br />

the visit of those liners that are already calling at the port.<br />

Page 16 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

2. RICHARDS BAY CRUISE PASSENGER TERMINAL<br />

No dedicated cruise liner terminal currently exists, passengers are passed through a customs tent and<br />

larger vessels are docked in the dirty part of the harbour alongside the piles of chrome ore, magnetite<br />

and coal. No significant progress on the objective of building a state-of-art dedicated cruise liner<br />

terminal has been made and Transnet have stated that from their perspective no business case <strong>for</strong> a<br />

passenger terminal exists. The strategic objectives below have not been achieved at the scale they were<br />

intended. This is largely because, up to this point, no financially viable proposals <strong>for</strong> a cruise liner<br />

terminal have been <strong>for</strong>mulated. However these are processes which take time and the groundwork <strong>for</strong><br />

these objectives is being put in place, albeit slowly (refer to Section 3.1, <strong>Strategy</strong> 3)<br />

1. Provide <strong>for</strong> an alternative entry point <strong>for</strong> overseas visitors to the region<br />

2. Meet demand <strong>for</strong> coastal resort facilities by the international market and thereby elevate<br />

tourism revenue yield <strong>for</strong> the local tourism industry<br />

3. Increase <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s share of the tourism market if matched with the development<br />

of appropriate attractions in the region; and<br />

4. Assist in promoting Richards Bay as a cruise liner tourism destination.<br />

(Halley Sharpe, 2003)<br />

Despite the lack of progress, 12,500 cruise liner tourists continue to visit Richards Bay annually and the<br />

cruise liner industry continues to grow.<br />

Page 17 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

3. ONGOYE TOURISM CLUSTER<br />

According to the 2003 <strong>Tourism</strong> Plan:<br />

“The Ongoye <strong>Tourism</strong> Cluster incorporates a number of natural, cultural and heritage attractions in the<br />

vicinity of Gingindlovu, Eshowe and Empangeni. Through identification, packaging, and marketing of<br />

these attractions, it is intended that this cluster is developed into a destination with critical mass. The<br />

coast and wildlife attractions to the north and east are the main regional attractions drawing a number<br />

of destination tourists and providing flow-through visitors as a market <strong>for</strong> the Ongoye cluster.”<br />

1. GINGINDLOVU<br />

A <strong>Tourism</strong> Gateway Cultural and Heritage Visitor Centre were proposed <strong>for</strong> the junction of the N2, R102<br />

and R66 as this was seen as a key nodal point. While there is a small craft centre on the road to Ongoye<br />

Forest, nothing else has been developed in this vicinity.<br />

2. ESHOWE<br />

Eshowe is an established tourism destination within the district, with many attractions, museums and<br />

the Dlinza Forest Boardwalk. Recent years have seen an erosion of this success with numbers declining<br />

at the museum and boardwalk while the tourism infrastructure at Mpushini Falls has become broken<br />

down and eroded. Eshowe’s decline in tourist numbers can largely be attributed to a lack of new<br />

tourism developments needed to satisfy the ever-changing tastes and demands of tourists. New<br />

attractions are needed to strengthen the tourism product around Eshowe as the town’s true tourism<br />

potential has not been fully realised. Private tourist establishment owners offer excellent facilities and<br />

accommodation, but attractions within the area have not increased significantly in the last five years<br />

and, until they do so, tourism in the region will continue to stagnate and even decline.<br />

3. KWABULAWAYO<br />

Page 18 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

KwaBulawayo is a flagship product of the municipality and substantial funding has been spent on<br />

developing it. The conference facilities are built and the facility is operational, recently hosting a cultural<br />

event. The long term success of this facility is yet to be ascertained as the facility was only recently<br />

opened. Improvements to the road infrastructure to KwaBulawayo need to be completed to improve<br />

access to the facility <strong>for</strong> tour buses. KwaBulawayo is a unique cultural attraction in that it fuses a<br />

modern conference facility, with its paved pathways, parking lot and other modern amenities, with the<br />

traditional layout and construction style of what was once Shaka’s military capital. If marketed<br />

effectively KwaBulawayo could be a great asset to <strong>uThungulu</strong>’s tourism offering.<br />

4. ONGOYE FOREST<br />

It was suggested that the <strong>for</strong>est become a key component of tourism in the district. A lack of private<br />

funding and investment interest has meant that this has not happened as of yet and the tourist<br />

attractions in the <strong>for</strong>est are still very limited. However some ef<strong>for</strong>ts have been made, with the track to<br />

the birding lodge being improved with concrete strips by the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. Additionally<br />

Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife have committed to improving and sustaining the <strong>for</strong>est by implementing a plan<br />

to fence the <strong>for</strong>est and thus protect the many unique and valuable species of fauna and flora. This will<br />

prevent cattle encroachment and enable endemic and other indigenous species to thrive.<br />

4. ROUTE 66 ‘ZULU CULTURAL HERITAGE ROUTE’ LINKAGE TO EMHAKHOSINI<br />

The plan <strong>for</strong> Route 66 has been a focal point <strong>for</strong> the municipality and has been a success in terms of<br />

implementation from its conception in the 2003 plan.<br />

Route 66 is operational, and pamphlets advertising the route have been distributed throughout the<br />

tourism offices in the province. The route is a success from the perspective of cross municipality<br />

cooperation and whilst it is in the early stages of operation, the route provides access to some of<br />

KwaZulu-Natal’s best cultural attractions and historic sites. The route brings many of the strategic<br />

objectives of the tourism master plan to the <strong>for</strong>e and has the potential to become the premier cultural<br />

Page 19 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

route in South Africa. Certainly the Route would offer tourist experiences just as diverse as those of<br />

other successful routes such as the Cape Wine Routes, the Garden Route and the Midlands Meander.<br />

5. ESHOWE / NKANDLA / KRANSKOP / BABANANGO / MELMOTH TOURISM<br />

ROUTE<br />

According to the 2003 Report:<br />

“The western portion of the <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is predominantly rural and is host to significant scenic,<br />

cultural, and heritage assets. Although not currently perceived as a tourism region, the area nevertheless<br />

has significant untapped potential. The opportunity to develop a tourism route as opposed to a cluster of<br />

attractions, serving as a secondary web to the primary Zulu Cultural Heritage Route, exists.”<br />

This route has not as yet been developed as a tourism node, with no apparent advertising or route signs<br />

designating it as a tourist area. The concept of this route has been neglected in preference of<br />

developing Route 66. Indeed it is difficult to expand the concept of a tourism route too widely and the<br />

focus, at least in the short-term, should be on developing Route 66 as it has significantly more<br />

attractions and tourism infrastructure, than this proposed route.<br />

6. SIYAYA COASTAL PARK: AMATIKULU / MTUNZINI / UMLALAZI<br />

The potential exists to encourage appropriate coastal development, which would elevate the status of<br />

the Siyaya Coastal Park as a discrete tourism destination.<br />

Currently there are no major new investments in the park area to take advantage of its scenic beach and<br />

coastal attractions. Since 2003 the developments around Port Durn<strong>for</strong>d which were owned by the<br />

community have closed and fallen into disrepair. Reports are that community rivalry and jealousy led to<br />

the demise of these developments. This highlights the importance of an effective community ownership<br />

model, one which is articulated in section 4.3. Whilst the accommodation capacity at Mtunzini has<br />

increased, the rest of the park has not seen any new developments. Accommodation options in Umlalazi<br />

Page 20 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Nature Reserve have remained unchanged, despite increased visitor numbers to the reserve in the past<br />

five years. There are currently no plans to expand accommodation within the reserve.<br />

7. N2 KWAMBONAMBI TOURISM JUNCTION<br />

Development of the N2 KwaMbonambi Junction is primarily intended to provide a safe stopping point<br />

offering toilet and refreshment facilities in a secure environment.<br />

Work is currently underway on the construction of an N2 interchange at KwaMbonambi. This would<br />

allow easier access <strong>for</strong> motorists visiting KwaMbonambi or Maphelane. Construction is expected to be<br />

complete at the end of 2011. Once construction of the interchange is complete, work will begin on the<br />

planned N2 West development which will include a service station; shopping centre and tourist centre.<br />

The development will aim to capture a portion of the passing tourist trade en route to the game<br />

reserves further north.<br />

8. LAKE NHLABANE, ESTUARY & DAWSONS ROCK<br />

A study carried out by Urban Econ has identified Lake Nhlabane as a potential tourism node with<br />

possibilities <strong>for</strong> linkages with the estuary, beach and the development of a ‘resort’ at Dawson’s Rock.<br />

Opportunities <strong>for</strong> pro-poor tourism development involving partnerships with the nearby impoverished<br />

rural communities are possible. As part of their corporate social responsibility programme, Richards Bay<br />

Minerals (RBM) could be approached as a development support partner <strong>for</strong> development in the area.<br />

(Halley, Sharpe, 2003:54)<br />

Developments in the Lake Nhlabane area have been hindered by mining activity which has only recently<br />

ceased. RBM has completed its mining of the area from Lake Nhlabane to Richards Bay and are willing<br />

to participate in developing nodes within this area as tourist attractions. Some steps have been taken by<br />

the local community and the local municipality in trying to acquire servitude rights to access the scenic<br />

beach at Lake Nhlabane estuary. No other steps have been taken to develop this area. However the<br />

timing has only really become appropriate as of late 2009. In terms of the suggestion of a ‘resort’ at<br />

Dawson’s rock, this is felt to be misplaced. The beaches in this area are experiencing heavy erosion, and<br />

Page 21 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

the scars of years of dune mining are all too evident. The project team feels that there are other better<br />

locations <strong>for</strong> a coastal resort in the district.<br />

Just north of the suggested tourism area, in an area still under RBM lease the community has re-opened<br />

a fishing camp. This <strong>for</strong>m of development is much more appropriate <strong>for</strong> this area.<br />

9. MAPELANE – LINKAGE<br />

Mapelane Wildlife Reserve, located at the southern extremity of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park, falls<br />

within the boundaries of the <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The relatively recent proclamation of the Park as a<br />

World Heritage Site has opened up significant opportunities <strong>for</strong> attracting greater numbers of <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

visitors, and private investment in tourism plant is being encouraged. Current visitor facilities at<br />

Mapelane attract the domestic fishing market and generate a relatively modest tourism revenue yield.<br />

Linking and integrating Mapelane with the opportunities being opened up in the rest of the park will add<br />

to the product <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> can offer both the domestic and <strong>for</strong>eign markets.<br />

There is a certain difficulty with linking Mapelane with the rest of St Lucia as it does not have direct road<br />

access into the town and the park. Driving from Maphelane to St Lucia takes a long time due to poor<br />

and indirect roads. The 2003 plan suggested upgrading the road linkages with the N2 and improving<br />

other bulk services. While the construction of the KwaMbonambi interchange will make it easier <strong>for</strong><br />

tourists to get onto the Maphelane road, the Maphelane road has degraded further since 2003 and the<br />

upgrade of this road is now more urgent.<br />

The intention (Halley Sharpe, 2003) of this was to:<br />

<br />

Facilitate an enabling environment <strong>for</strong> private investment in appropriate tourism plant at<br />

Mapelane;<br />

<br />

Benefit from the branding and marketing of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park as a World<br />

Heritage Site;<br />

Page 22 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

<br />

Ultimately attract a greater share of the <strong>for</strong>eign market and thereby increase tourism revenue<br />

yield; and<br />

<br />

Create strategic linkages with the wildlife and coastal nature tourism attractions of Northern<br />

Zululand<br />

No private investment has taken place at Mapelane. This is mostly attributable to the poor road<br />

network around the reserve. Links to the accommodation at Lake Eteza and Richards Bay, as well as St<br />

Lucia are still poor and the other objectives cannot be met until this is addressed.<br />

10. Royal Zulu Reserve – Linkage to Hluhluwe-Umfolozi<br />

“The proposal to develop the Royal Zulu Biosphere Reserve is an ambitious undertaking involving the<br />

development of a large tract of land south of the Umfolozi/Hluhluwe Reserve, into three distinct land<br />

uses:<br />

• Conservation comprising Game Reserves and eco-tourism facilities;<br />

• Agriculture; and<br />

• Formalised settlement in and around an existing village.<br />

Under the umbrella of the overall development concept of the Royal Zulu Game Reserve, conservation<br />

areas are located on land of varying tenure, including State Land and Ingonyama Trust Land, and the<br />

traditional land of the Obuka, Mhlana and Somopho Tribal Authorities.”<br />

(Halley Sharpe, 2003:45)<br />

Such is the perceived importance of this project, that its current status and prospect <strong>for</strong> success or<br />

failure is discussed in greater detail in Section 3.1, <strong>Strategy</strong> 2.1.<br />

Page 23 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Summary of previous projects and place in current Master Plan<br />

Of all the projects identified by the Halley Sharpe authored <strong>Tourism</strong> Master Plan, only three, namely the<br />

Richards Bay Waterfront; Route 66 and KwaBulawayo have successfully been implemented. The<br />

principal reasons <strong>for</strong> the lack of implementation of the other projects relate to funding and viability<br />

issues. This has contributed to extended delays in implementation. Nonetheless the majority of these<br />

projects are retained in the current tourism Master Plan, and various alternatives <strong>for</strong> financial viability<br />

are assessed later in subsequent sections. Two projects are excluded from the current Master Plan.<br />

These are the Nkandla <strong>Tourism</strong> Route and the Gingindlovu <strong>Tourism</strong> Gateway. In regards to the <strong>for</strong>mer<br />

it is felt that it is better to invest more extensively in the Route 66 development and not expand the<br />

concept of ‘route tourism’ too widely. The Gingindlovu <strong>Tourism</strong> Gateway is not prioritised in the new<br />

master plan as it is felt that attractions in Eshowe itself should be better developed as a first priority.<br />

Page 24 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Monitoring Tool<br />

Table 1 is a tool to monitor the application of the strategic projects identified in the 2003 plan.<br />

Has the project Have the strategic Does the project fit<br />

Project:<br />

been implemented<br />

or support<br />

objectives of the<br />

project plan been<br />

into the 2009<br />

tourism master<br />

provided?<br />

met?<br />

plan?<br />

RB waterfront & beach YES YES YES<br />

RB cruise liner<br />

NO NO YES<br />

terminal<br />

Eshowe YES YES YES<br />

Gingindlovu NO NO NO<br />

Ongoye Forest YES YES YES<br />

KwaBulawayo YES YES YES<br />

R66 YES YES YES<br />

Nkandla <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

NO NO NO<br />

Route<br />

Siyaya Coastal Park NO NO YES<br />

N2 KwaMbonambi<br />

NO<br />

NO (currently<br />

YES<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Junction<br />

underway)<br />

Lake Nhlabane NO NO YES<br />

Mapelane Linkage NO NO YES<br />

Royal Zulu YES NO YES<br />

Page 25 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Section 3: <strong>Tourism</strong> Product and Infrastructure <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

The tourism product offered by a destination may be pre‐existing or may need to be created.<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s tourism product is fragmented, with a number of different and independent<br />

products being offered. These tourism products need to be linked in order to create broader tourism<br />

experiences <strong>for</strong> visitors to the district. In addition, the current suite of tourism products tends to target<br />

specific market segments and thus should be supplemented by new product developments which<br />

appeal to a wider market. <strong>Tourism</strong> infrastructure refers to those elements of development which<br />

support the tourism products, these include, roads; signage; restaurants; petrol stations and<br />

accommodation in the area. Identifying <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s tourism ‘product/s’ and necessary<br />

‘infrastructure’, must come out of the analysis of the district’s strengths and weaknesses; its<br />

comparative advantages and a gap analysis of tourism in the district. In taking into consideration these<br />

factors, recommendations in this report draw heavily on the research underpinning the Situational<br />

Analysis Report and the SWOT Analysis Report.<br />

The SWOT Analysis Report identifies eco-tourism and cultural tourism as the two areas where<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> holds competitive advantages and wherein significant tourism growth potential<br />

exists. The SWOT Analysis, however, is mindful of the fact that, while certain niche markets exist in both<br />

eco-tourism and cultural tourism in the district, a wider and more international market needs to be<br />

captured through these attractions. For instance, while <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> possesses a 100km coastline<br />

and numerous untouched wilderness areas, the district has neither a coastal resort of any sort, nor a big<br />

five game reserve. Similarly, up until recently with the launch of the Route 66 Cultural and Heritage<br />

Route, the historical and cultural attractions in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> have been disjointed and isolated<br />

from one another, only appealing to very specific groups of cultural tourists (such as Norwegian<br />

missionary tourists in Eshowe).<br />

The product and infrastructure strategies identified in this section and listed in table 2 are general ones<br />

that should be pursued in order to ensure that maximum advantage is taken of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s<br />

tourism potential. These strategies set the foundations on which specific tourism initiatives can be built<br />

upon. The rationale behind each of these strategies will not be explained in great detail here and<br />

reference should be made to the Situational Analysis and SWOT Analysis reports.<br />

Page 26 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Table 2 - List of General Product and Infrastructure Strategies<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> Description Priority Level<br />

1. Develop the Coastline <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Purposes<br />

2. Pursue Big Five Game<br />

Reserve in <strong>District</strong><br />

3. Encourage Cruise Ship<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> in Richards Bay<br />

4. Extensively Develop the<br />

Route 66 Product<br />

5. Develop Great Forests of<br />

Zululand Experience<br />

6. Develop Contemporary<br />

African Cultural <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

7. Improve Accessibility and<br />

Visibility of Existing<br />

Attractions<br />

8. Develop Adventure<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> in the <strong>District</strong><br />

9. Ensure Tourist Safety in<br />

Volatile Areas<br />

10. Provide more Family-<br />

Attractions and Facilities<br />

Improve accessibility.<br />

Reclaim coast <strong>for</strong> tourism.<br />

Accommodation development.<br />

Provide support <strong>for</strong> private game reserve projects.<br />

Interact with KZN wildlife.<br />

Construct dedicated passenger liner terminal.<br />

Improve linkages with region’s attractions <strong>for</strong> cruise tourists<br />

Encourage tourism related SMME’s to locate on Route.<br />

Product development.<br />

Standardise signage<br />

Construct campsites/cabins.<br />

Develop paths.<br />

Package Great Forest tours.<br />

Add to existing cultural attractions by developing urban<br />

African tourism.<br />

Tar strategically important access roads.<br />

Improve signage to remote areas<br />

Promote adventure sports.<br />

Introduce high-thrill attractions.<br />

Create safe tourism precincts.<br />

Ensure community cooperation.<br />

Provide armed security.<br />

Develop child friendly and family-oriented attractions in the<br />

district.<br />

High<br />

High<br />

Medium/High<br />

High<br />

Medium<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

Medium<br />

11. Promote Events Promote more events in the district to increase exposure Medium<br />

12. Nodal <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Development <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

Identify and define areas in which local economic development<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts should focus on tourism. Identify tourism corridors<br />

Medium/High<br />

Page 27 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

3.1 Ten Product and Infrastructure Strategies <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

1. Develop the Coastline <strong>for</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> Purposes<br />

Despite having +/- 100km of beaches, relatively little tourism development has occurred on <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>’s coastline. The district’s beaches function primarily as recreational zones <strong>for</strong> locals and as a<br />

fishing holiday destination <strong>for</strong> domestic tourists. There are presently no authentic coastal resorts in the<br />

district, despite some large stretches of pristine coastline. The tourism appeal of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s<br />

coastline is hindered by a lack of safe swimming options; inaccessibility; the ban on 4×4’s on the beach;<br />

extensive mining of dunes and severe soil erosion in certain areas. Strategies that look to mitigate these<br />

hindering factors are essential <strong>for</strong> developing the tourism potential of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s coastline. A<br />

number of the strategies mentioned here have been highlighted previously in the 2004 Coastal<br />

Management Plan (enacted in December 2009), but have yet to be effectively implemented, and due to<br />

the time elapse are now more urgent.<br />

1.1. Open up the coastal stretch between Richards Bay and the Nhlabane Estuary <strong>for</strong> tourism<br />

development<br />

Richards Bay Minerals (RBM) has been mining sand dunes in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> since 1976. RBM’s<br />

mining activities have rendered certain sections of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s coastline ‘no-go-areas’ <strong>for</strong> a long<br />

period of time. At present RBM leases three coastal areas from the Ingonyama Trust, these are namely,<br />

Zulti South (Richards Bay to Umlalazi), Tisand (Richards Bay to Nhlabane) and Zulti North (Nhlabane to<br />

Maphelane). Mining has yet to start at Zulti South, but when it commences, mining is expected to last<br />

to at least 2050. Mining at Zulti North is expected to continue until 2019. However, the good news <strong>for</strong><br />

tourism in the district is that RBM has completed their mining activities at Tisand. Handing this land<br />

back to the community requires that RBM complete an Environmental Management Plan <strong>for</strong> the closure<br />

of mining activities in this area. Currently only one EMP exists <strong>for</strong> all of RBM’s operations at the smelter,<br />

meaning that RBM cannot hand the land back to the community until all operations have ceased in<br />

2050. In this regard the district municipality can greatly assist tourism development along the coast by<br />

supporting RBM’s ef<strong>for</strong>ts to split the EMP <strong>for</strong> all three mining areas.<br />

Page 28 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

If RBM were to be able to hand over the Tisand area to local communities, significant tourism<br />

opportunities would present themselves. While not all of the coastline would be suitable <strong>for</strong> tourism<br />

development due to extensive erosion of the beaches (at a rate of 4.5m a year), the area around the<br />

Nhlabane estuary presents great opportunities <strong>for</strong> tourism development and was indentified <strong>for</strong> tourism<br />

development in the 2004 Coastal Management Plan. The area has excellent infrastructure (good roads;<br />

electricity; water) which RBM would leave behind when the EMP is complete. In addition, due to RBM’s<br />

dune rehabilitation ef<strong>for</strong>ts, most of the coastline is populated by pristine indigenous <strong>for</strong>ests and, to a<br />

lesser extent, Casuarinas’ plantations. Lake Nhlabane, itself, is a scenic attraction with small populations<br />

of hippos and crocodiles. The estuary is navigable <strong>for</strong> canoes and has excellent birding potential. In fact,<br />

RBM currently hosts annual birding days in the coastal <strong>for</strong>est abutting the lake.<br />

Conversations with RBM’s ecologist, Michelle Boschoff and with KZN Wildlife, reveal that there is scope<br />

<strong>for</strong> the development of eco-sensitive accommodation around either Lake Nhlabane proper, or alongside<br />

the Nhlabane Estuary. This concurs with the original suggestion of the Coastal Management Plan to<br />

develop accommodation at the estuary with the capacity to sleep twelve. The recommended area <strong>for</strong><br />

this sort of development is in the isolated patches of casuarinas, which are sprinkled around the<br />

Nhlabane Estuary. Fishing remains the main attraction <strong>for</strong> beach visitors in the area and developing<br />

accommodation to cater <strong>for</strong> fisherman would provide the initial impetus <strong>for</strong> developing the Tisand area<br />

as a tourist destination. This said, however, the lake and estuary could also offer canoeing, birding tours<br />

and hikes. There is also the possibility of educational eco-tours which take people through the process<br />

of dune rehabilitation. At the river mouth, a picnic area should be developed, which is both conducive<br />

to the needs of fisherman and attractive to families visiting the Richard’s Bay area. <strong>Final</strong>ly a number of<br />

whale watching towers can be erected which make use of the vantage point provided by the high sand<br />

dunes in the area.<br />

1.2. Create coastal hiking trails<br />

The KwaZulu-Natal coastline has a glaring lack of coastal hiking routes. This is not so much because of<br />

the unsuitability of the terrain or beaches <strong>for</strong> hiking, but rather because of the high settlement density<br />

along the province’s coastline. High coastal settlement density has a negative impact on the desirability<br />

of coastal hiking routes in two ways. Firstly it does not lend itself to the feeling of seclusion that tourists<br />

Page 29 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

are usually attracted to and, secondly, it tends to be more conducive to a higher incidence of criminal<br />

activity. In <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>, however, two areas offer excellent possibilities <strong>for</strong> overnight coastal<br />

hiking trails. Both of these areas are predominantly located in protected conservation parks, managed<br />

by KZN Wildlife. As such, they are pristine stretches of coastline, largely secluded from areas of human<br />

settlement. The first of these possible hiking routes was identified in the 2004 Coastal Management<br />

Plan and is located almost entirely in the Siyaya Coastal Park, and would link the Amatikulu Nature<br />

Reserve in the south with the Umlalazi Nature Reserve in the north. The Coastal Management Plan<br />

(2004:5) elaborated on the need to develop a half-way campsite in order to make the hike a successful<br />

initiative. This campsite, which was to be able to sleep 16 people, is still considered critical to the<br />

success of an overnight hiking trail between Umlalazi Estuary and Amatikulu Estuary.<br />

A second potential hiking route is at the northern extremity of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s coastline and would<br />

link St Lucia (just outside of the district) to the wreck site of the Jolly Rubino, south of Mapelane Nature<br />

Reserve. Most of the second hike will also take place within the boundaries of the Mapelane area. A<br />

possible overnight stop could be the Cape St Lucia lighthouse just 2km south of the wreck site. The<br />

Mbonambi <strong>Municipality</strong> currently has plans to develop accommodation and a restaurant at the<br />

lighthouse property. This could then act as an ideal half-way (or turnaround stop) <strong>for</strong> hikers. Both hikes<br />

would require armed rangers, predominantly so as to avoid any un<strong>for</strong>tunate incidents with hippos or<br />

crocodiles, but also to ensure the non-interference of any potential criminal elements. The hikes would<br />

incorporate canoeing/kayaking, when flooded rivers need to be crossed.<br />

1.3. Regain blue flag status <strong>for</strong> Alkantstrand Beach<br />

In 2009 Alkantstrand Beach in Richards Bay was awarded Blue Flag status. This was a notable<br />

achievement as ‘Blue Flag’ are considered the standard bearers <strong>for</strong> international beach quality. It also<br />

represented the successful achievement of one of the major strategic initiatives identified in the 2004<br />

Coastal Management Plan. Alkantstrand has, however, subsequently lost its Blue Flag status. The Blue<br />

Flag programme, upon being asked why the beach had lost its Blue flag status, said that it had nothing to<br />

do with water quality but rather was as a result of a deterioration in beach infrastructure (including<br />

toilets and lifeguard towers) and an unacceptable amount of litter found on the beach. A representative<br />

of the Blue Flag Programme said that it was these visual conditions which had led to the beach being<br />

Page 30 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

stripped of its Blue Flag status. The Blue Flag representative believed that, with better management the<br />

beach could regain its Blue Flag status. Alkantstrand Beach would, however, have to reapply <strong>for</strong> the<br />

programme and become a pilot Blue Flag beach <strong>for</strong> a year first be<strong>for</strong>e it could re-gain Blue Flag status.<br />

Regaining Blue Flag status should be regarded as a primary tourism strategy <strong>for</strong> the district and <strong>for</strong> the<br />

local municipality. Blue Flag status acts as a positive signal to tourists (<strong>for</strong>eign in particular) that a<br />

particular beach is worth visiting. Management structures, with regular and effective monitoring should<br />

be put in place such that Blue Flag status is achieved as soon as possible.<br />

Blue flag status alone,<br />

however, will not make Alkantstrand Beach a major tourist attraction as it currently has limited appeal<br />

<strong>for</strong> tourists and is more of an urban recreational beach, than a true holiday destination beach. As such,<br />

improving Alkantstrand’s tourism appeal will require the upgrading of old and the provision of new<br />

facilities at the beach, as well as a greater clustering of attractions around the beach and marina area<br />

(this is discussed in the section on nodal development).<br />

1.4. Expand swimming options along the coastline<br />

Despite Alkantstrand’s limitations, it remains the only truly safe swimming beach in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Mtunzini/Umlalazi beach, which has the potential to be a popular beach destination, has no shark nets,<br />

and a high shark population, making bathing hazardous <strong>for</strong> tourists. The high prevalence of shark<br />

activity is a feature along the entire <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> coastline. Coupled with strong inshore channels<br />

and currents, this is near prohibitive to promoting bathing along the coastline (except at Alkantstrand<br />

which is sheltered by the bay). This is not to say that beach tourism is not worthwhile pursuing, but<br />

rather that swimming alternatives need to be investigated. The ideal, in this regard, is to construct tidal<br />

pools at beaches such as the one at Umlalazi as well as at Port Durn<strong>for</strong>d. Tidal pools, however, require a<br />

strong rock base <strong>for</strong> construction. The relative scarcity of rocky outcrops along the coastline may<br />

complicate this particular strategy to broaden swimming options in the districts. Alternatively bathing<br />

enclosures could be investigated as a means of ensuring the safety of bathers at these beaches.<br />

Page 31 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

1.5. Develop a Coastal Resort in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

There are few genuine coastal resorts in KwaZulu-Natal. James Seymour from <strong>Tourism</strong> KwaZulu-Natal<br />

identifies this as a constraint to <strong>for</strong>eign tourism growth in the province. Many <strong>for</strong>eign tourists seek allinclusive<br />

resort style accommodation which offers escapist getaway experiences. These tourists do not<br />

want to stay in coastal villages, or towns, but rather are looking <strong>for</strong> dedicated, private and secluded<br />

resorts. Zimbali Coastal Resort and Thonga Beach Lodge are two examples of coastal resorts in<br />

KwaZulu-Natal and are located in the neighbouring districts of Ilembe and Umkhanyakude respectively.<br />

Neither is renowned <strong>for</strong> their safe swimming beaches, and both place far more emphasis on their<br />

enchanting coastal <strong>for</strong>est settings and long sandy beaches. Just beyond KwaZulu-Natal’s southern<br />

boundaries are the Wild Coast Sun Resort and Umgazi River Bungalows. Once again neither resort has a<br />

designated safe swimming beach. The <strong>for</strong>mer of these resorts relies on the appeal of a well established<br />

casino, but Umgazi River Bungalows, makes use of a picturesque lagoon and pristine coastline. Thus it is<br />

apparent that safe swimming beaches (with shark nets) are not a pre-requisite <strong>for</strong> coastal resort<br />

developments. In KwaZulu-Natal, and in the Transkei, resort tourists seemingly base their choice of<br />

beach resort on the beauty and tranquillity of the location rather than on the availability of a shark-net<br />

protected beach 1 . <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> has a number of areas along its coastline which are virtually<br />

untouched from a development perspective, and retain their centuries’ old natural quality and serenity.<br />

These areas present great opportunities <strong>for</strong> the development of a coastal resort.<br />

In respect to the best possible location of a coastal resort in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>, the most logical area<br />

would be in the Siyaya Coastal Park. RBM mining operations north of Nhlabane and, in the future, south<br />

of Richards Bay, as well as heavy erosion between Richards Bay and Nhlabane, rule out these stretches<br />

of coastline.<br />

The Maphelane area has some potential, but is mostly outside of the district and<br />

nonetheless already has a well established KZN Wildlife camp, not to mention also being very closely<br />

located to a high density of accommodation at St Lucia. The Siyaya Coastal Park, south of Umlalazi,<br />

however, is a perfect location <strong>for</strong> the development of a coastal resort. While there is significant<br />

accommodation at Mtunzini Village and Umlalazi Nature Reserve, there is presently, apart from the<br />

Twinstreams Educational Adventure Centre, no accommodation between Umlalazi and Amatikulu. This<br />

stretch contains conserved coastal dune <strong>for</strong>ests, and beaches, which unlike those north of Richards Bay,<br />

1 This is important however, <strong>for</strong> a lower end of the tourist market (including <strong>for</strong>eign tourists but especially visitors<br />

from Gauteng), <strong>for</strong> whom safe swimming beaches are a must. Thus, as indicated in strategy 1.3, safe swimming<br />

options should still be pursued<br />

Page 32 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

are actually widening annually. The area inland of the Coastal Park is also relatively sparsely populated.<br />

However, KZN Wildlife, in an interview with the project team, suggested that the best area <strong>for</strong> the<br />

location of a coastal resort would be in an area of the Siyaya Coastal Park known as the Tommage Pan.<br />

The Tommage Pan, has been given back to the local community as custodians, and is situated in front of<br />

the Dokodweni community settlement and to the east of the Amatikulu Estuary. Substantial patches of<br />

exotic casuarinas trees, which could easily be cleared, would present an ideal location <strong>for</strong> a resort style<br />

development in this area. The area around the prawn farm and Prawn Shack, in particular, with its<br />

excellent views of the Amatikulu Estuary, could be an ideal location <strong>for</strong> resort accommodation. The<br />

development could also significantly benefit both the environmental status of the area (which,<br />

unmanaged, may now be under threat) as well as benefitting the local community in respect to<br />

generating jobs and income from leasing arrangements.<br />

A coastal resort development in the Tommage Pan area would be an attractive tourism development<br />

option <strong>for</strong> a number of reasons, these include:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The resort would have almost exclusive access to over 10km of deserted sandy beaches<br />

The resort would be situated in pristine coastal dune <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

The resort would enjoy sweeping views of the Amatikulu Estuary<br />

The resort could offer kayaking opportunities on the Amatikulu Estuary<br />

The resort would be in close proximity to two popular KZN Wildlife Nature Reserves, namely, the<br />

Amatikulu Nature Reserve and the Umlalazi Nature Reserve (and the Raphia Palm Monument)<br />

The resort may, in the future, be in the middle of a popular coastal hiking route<br />

The resort could be seen as a way of protecting the high environmental status of the area<br />

The Tommage Pan offers more space in which development can occur without damaging the<br />

coastal dune <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

By being located on community-owned land, the development would enhance the equitable<br />

distribution of tourism benefits among residents in the district<br />

There are some disadvantages to locating a resort in this area. One such disadvantage is the presence of<br />

a relatively large settlement nearby. This is a potential threat both in terms of crime and from an<br />

aesthetic point of view. Another possible disadvantage is the fact that tourism projects on community<br />

owned land have had a low success rate in the district. This need not be prohibitive, however, if an<br />

Page 33 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

effective framework <strong>for</strong> community-private tourism projects is instituted. This will be discussed in<br />

greater detail later in this report.<br />

2. Pursue “Big Five” Game Reserve Development<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has a number of nature reserves, and, in Thula Thula, a small game<br />

reserve, but despite the availability of large wilderness areas and suitable terrain, the district has no “big<br />

five” game reserves. (“Big five” game reserves offer the possibility of viewing buffalo, elephant, lion,<br />

leopard and rhinocerous). Such is the expertise of tourism marketing specialists, that <strong>for</strong>eign tourists<br />

demand nothing less of a ‘safari’ experience than to have the opportunity of seeing the Big Five. The<br />

absence of the opportunity to spot the Big Five in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>, thus, constitutes a serious gap in<br />

the eco-tourism product offered by the district. A Big Five Game Reserve in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> would<br />

be the closest Big Five Game Reserve to the new international airport at La Mercy, and presents an<br />

excellent opportunity to encourage a greater number of <strong>for</strong>eign tourists to the district. It is the<br />

recommendation of the project team, that the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> vigorously pursue the development<br />

of a Big Five Game Reserve within the district. Two potential Big Five projects, driven by the private<br />

sector and local communities, are currently underway in the district. The <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should<br />

endeavour to support these initiatives as they could become catalytic <strong>for</strong> tourism in the district.<br />

2.1. Renewed support <strong>for</strong> the Royal Zulu concept<br />

The concept of the Royal Zulu Game Reserve is not a new one and was identified in the 2003 <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Plan <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> as a catalytic project <strong>for</strong> tourism development in the district. The concept<br />

was to convert 18,000-20,000ha of private land, community owned land and state land into a large<br />

game reserve, comprising of a number of tourist lodges to be part-owned by the local community. The<br />

long-run intention of the project was to drop fences with the Hluhluwe-Umfolozi game reserve, thereby<br />

locating the southern entrance to this famous park in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>, less than an hour and a half<br />

from the new international airport. Six years later, Royal Zulu, has yet to become a reality. Ef<strong>for</strong>ts some<br />

3-5 years ago to fence the area met with resistance from the local community, and may have led to<br />

Page 34 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

disillusionment with the project from the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>’s perspective. The project, however, has<br />

progressed since then and may be imminently realisable.<br />

A meeting with Lawrence Anthony, driver of the project and owner of Thula Thula, revealed that the<br />

community were now supportive of the project and that the major hold-up is actually with the stateowned<br />

land, whose ownership was recently handed over to the Department of Land Affairs. Mr<br />

Anthony assures that this hold up is not over any substantive issues and rather is procedural in nature,<br />

and believes that support from the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> would greatly assist in this process. Mr Anthony<br />

explains that the subsequent development of accommodation on the land, once fenced, would be a<br />

joint venture between the community and private investors, with 50/50 profit sharing and the<br />

opportunity <strong>for</strong> locals to participate in running lodges. In addition to the revenue generated from<br />

accommodation, the Royal Zulu Reserve would also embark on a breeding, with the aim of selling,<br />

programme <strong>for</strong> buffalo, white rhino and black rhino.<br />

While the Royal Zulu project has been tumultuous at times, it still represents one of the best tourism<br />

opportunities in the district, and certainly one of only two viable Big Five Game Reserve options in the<br />

district. The possible dropping of fences between Royal Zulu with Hluhluwe –Umfolozi would give<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> a tourism stake in the oldest, largest and most popular game reserve in the province.<br />

Royal Zulu has the significant advantage of being able to draw on the international reputation of Thula<br />

Thula and the charismatic persona of Lawrence Anthony. In addition the area is reputedly the site of<br />

Shaka’s childhood home, and Dingiswayo’s kraal, so has a rich history attached to it. The project would<br />

also stand to benefit local communities enormously. It is there<strong>for</strong>e the recommendation of this strategy<br />

document that the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> renew their support <strong>for</strong> the Royal Zulu Project. Further details<br />

concerning what role the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> can play will be discussed later on in this report.<br />

2.2. Simunye Project<br />

The second viable Big Five option <strong>for</strong> the district is that which is embodied in the Simunye Project. The<br />

Simunye Project is basically a land re<strong>for</strong>m project which aims to establish a community owned game<br />

reserve on land in Mthonjaneni <strong>Municipality</strong>. As part of the project a 6,000ha piece of community<br />

owned land has already been fenced and registered as a game reserve with KZN Wildlife. Another<br />

Page 35 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

6,300ha of beneficiary land has yet to be fenced but will be incorporated, with the fenced land, as part<br />

of a game reserve. The eventual aim is to link these areas with Opathe Game Reserve and Emakhosini<br />

Heritage Park, creating a singular game reserve 38,000ha in area. The 12,000ha of land in the Simunye<br />

Project is regarded as having exceptional biodiversity and is considered to be excellent black rhino<br />

country. Like Thula Thula is to Royal Zulu, Simunye Lodge, rated 2 nd best cultural village in the country,<br />

is regarded as the catalyst <strong>for</strong> the Simunye Project. Simunye Lodge’s relationship with Protea Hotels has<br />

been extended to the rest of the project, with Protea Hotels agreeing to operate all of the proposed<br />

lodges within the project land. These lodges are presently old farmhouses and guesthouses which are<br />

currently being converted.<br />

The Simunye Project has major backing from the local community and from the Department of Land<br />

Affairs; 6,000ha of land has already been fenced and registered; Simunye Lodge is a renowned cultural<br />

village; and a partnership is in place with a reliable private sector provider. For these reasons the<br />

Simunye Project presents an excellent opportunity <strong>for</strong> the development of a Big Five Game Reserve in<br />

the district. The minimum area <strong>for</strong> which KZN Wildlife will consider an application to stock lions is<br />

5000ha. The fenced part of the reserve is 6000ha, so in theory, lions could possibly be introduced into<br />

the reserve. Additionally the creation of an extended game reserve including Opathe and Emakhosini<br />

would create a tourism zone which blends heritage and wildlife attractions, running on either side of<br />

Route 66. The district should, wherever possible, look to assist in furthering the aims of this project.<br />

Further details of how the district can support the Simunye Project will be discussed later on in this<br />

report.<br />

2.3. Supporting both Projects<br />

Both the Royal Zulu and Simunye Projects look to create large community-owned tourism conservation<br />

areas linked to existing game reserves outside of the district. While one might think that these two<br />

projects are too similar to support simultaneously, the lack of genuine large game reserves, means that<br />

the district has the capacity to sustain both of these developments. Neighbouring Umkhanyakude has<br />

no less than 10 large game reserves. Furthermore Royal Zulu and Simunye, will create two distinctly<br />

separate clusters, the <strong>for</strong>mer of which will gravitate toward Hluhluwe-Umfolozi and the latter of which<br />

Page 36 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

will gravitate toward Opathe and Emakhosini. These could, in the future become some of the most<br />

popular tourist destinations in the country.<br />

3. Encourage Cruise Ship <strong>Tourism</strong> in Richards Bay<br />

The Cruise tourist market is a very lucrative one and offers high returns in the <strong>for</strong>m of <strong>for</strong>eign spending<br />

in the district. Presently around 25 cruise ships enter Richards Bay annually. This is equivalent to 12,500<br />

cruise tourists docking at Richards Bay per year. When one considers that most of these tourists are<br />

from overseas, this is akin to a direct injection of <strong>for</strong>eign investment into Richards Bay and <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> in general. Cruise tourists should be encouraged to disembark and spend time and money in the<br />

district, as an immediate priority. As a longer term priority, more cruise ships should be encouraged to<br />

dock at Richards Bay. The port has the opportunity to market itself as the gateway to both the Game<br />

Reserves of Northern KwaZulu‐Natal and to the attractions of Swaziland and southern Mozambique. By<br />

positioning itself as such, the Port of Richards Bay could become one of the most popular cruise ship<br />

stops in Southern Africa.<br />

3.1. Construct a dedicated passenger liner terminal as a means of attracting more cruise ships<br />

This issue is a contentious one and was also articulated in the 2003 <strong>Tourism</strong> Plan. The issue is that<br />

Transnet believe that the construction of a passenger liner terminal in Richards Bay does not make<br />

business sense as the capital outlay is too high compared to the expected return from port charges <strong>for</strong><br />

cruise ships entering Richards Bay. The indirect, multiplier impact of cruise ship tourism in Richards Bay,<br />

however, is significant <strong>for</strong> tourism development in the district. The construction of a dedicated<br />

passenger liner terminal, as opposed to mobile welcoming units, would have the effect of making<br />

Richards Bay a much more appealing cruise ship destination. This is important because cruise ships<br />

generally contain the highly lucrative <strong>for</strong>eign tourist market. If 70% of the estimated 12,500 (500<br />

passengers per ship) cruise tourists docking at Richards Bay, are <strong>for</strong>eign and spend at least one day in<br />

the district, spending R880 per day (TKZN, 2008), then one can make a rough estimation of the total<br />

spending of cruise tourists in the district. Total cruise tourist spending in the district would be in the<br />

region of R8 million per annum. At a tourism multiplier of 1.42 (TKZN, 2008), the total contribution of<br />

Page 37 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

cruise ship tourism to the local economy is about R11.5 million per annum. A key question is whether<br />

the construction of a passenger liner terminal and other ancillary facilities <strong>for</strong> cruise tourists in Richards<br />

Bay, would significantly add to the revenue generated from cruise tourism and whether this revenue<br />

would justify this sort of investment? A study on the cruise ship industry commissioned by the City of<br />

Cape Town states that “in their most simplistic development application, cruise terminals have highly<br />

constrained revenue generating capabilities-port charges cannot cover terminal developments”, rather<br />

the “majority of benefit is experienced at the community level”. However, the revenue generation of<br />

additional cruise tourism <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> as a whole, let alone port charges, may fail to justify the<br />

capital outlay needed <strong>for</strong> the construction of a passenger liner terminal. It is <strong>for</strong> this reason that a<br />

passenger liner terminal should be developed as a multi-use facility, generating other tourist income <strong>for</strong><br />

the district as well as cruise tourist income. The passenger liner terminal should not simply be a piece of<br />

infrastructure but should also be an attraction in its own right.<br />

The Cape Town study provides the example of the Bell Harbour International Conference Centre in<br />

Seattle, which combines a major cruise terminal with conference facilities, including banquet rooms;<br />

meeting rooms and a 300 person auditorium. It is the recommendation of this strategy that a similar<br />

type of facility is developed <strong>for</strong> Richards Bay. The nature of the development is such that the<br />

government would have to provide the majority of the funding, as not enough of the external benefits<br />

are likely to be captured to make the development feasible from a strictly business point of view.<br />

3.2. Creating a cruise destination at Richards Bay<br />

While a passenger liner terminal will definitely add to the appeal of Richards Bay as a cruise ship<br />

destination, the attractiveness of the destination goes beyond the port itself. Destinations are also<br />

selected on the basis of tourist facilities in the immediate vicinity of the port, tourism attractions in the<br />

district and transport linkages with other attractions in the province. In the first respect Richards Bay<br />

should develop its waterfront area more extensively to cater <strong>for</strong> cruise tourists. This will, in part, be<br />

achieved by the establishment of a tourism zone, or tourism precinct, around the Richards Bay marina<br />

and waterfront.<br />

Page 38 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Cruise ship tourists have been described as ‘cash-rich, time-poor’ (TKZN, 2003). As such it is imperative<br />

to maximise the spending opportunities available to Cruise Tourists in the short period of time in which<br />

they are in the district. This would involve developing and marketing comprehensive day packages <strong>for</strong><br />

cruise tourists. The longer term vision <strong>for</strong> Richards Bay as a cruise destination should be to market the<br />

port as being the closest to a Big Five Reserve of all of South Africa’s ports, and as a major gateway to<br />

the land of the Zulu. Day trips to a future Big Five Reserve in the district should be marketed as one of<br />

the main attractions of Richards Bay as a cruise ship destination. While cruise tourists only spend a<br />

minimal amount of time in the district, it should be borne in mind that “some 85% of the passengers are<br />

‘destination sampling’ with a view to returning <strong>for</strong> longer periods at a later stage”. (TKZN, 2003)<br />

such <strong>uThungulu</strong> must look to the indirect as well as the direct benefits of cruise tourism, and realise the<br />

opportunity that cruise tourism provides to promote the district internationally.<br />

As<br />

Where possible,<br />

however, <strong>uThungulu</strong> and the Port of Richards Bay should also look to attract re-provisioning/repositioning<br />

cruise ships which stay in Port <strong>for</strong> at least two days, “paving the way <strong>for</strong> longer shore<br />

excursions <strong>for</strong> cruise tourists” and allowing the district more time to create a positive impression.<br />

(TKZN, 2003)<br />

In addition a long term vision should include the potential to create a multi-modal link between the Port<br />

of Richards Bay and the Port of Maputo. In this conception cruise tourists would stop at Richards Bay (as<br />

the end of the first leg of their journey), disembark and board a train or tour bus which would make its<br />

way up Route 66. This would enable tourists to engage in various cultural activities along the way and, if<br />

the Simunye Project is complete, provide them with the opportunity to stay overnight at a Game<br />

Reserve. Alternatively tourists can enjoy the Big Five experience at Pongola/Jozini Dam, be<strong>for</strong>e moving<br />

onto Swaziland and then on to Maputo where they would re-board the cruise ship to embark on their<br />

next leg of the journey. Alternatively tourists could simply fly home from Maputo, if their particular<br />

passenger liner is inflexible in allowing <strong>for</strong> re-embarking. This could be advertised as a three countries in<br />

three days tour package <strong>for</strong> cruise tourists. A package of this nature could greatly enhance the appeal of<br />

Richards Bay as a cruise ship destination and could have substantial benefits <strong>for</strong> the rest of the district.<br />

Page 39 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

4. Extensively Develop the Route 66 Project<br />

The launching of the Zulu Cultural and Heritage Route, Route 66 constitutes significant progress toward<br />

tourism development in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The Route provides linkages between <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

and Zululand <strong>District</strong>, incorporating numerous cultural, historical and wildlife attractions, which<br />

otherwise would have existed in relative isolation. The Route aims to benefit from economies of scale<br />

by integrating these attractions and accommodation establishments into one holistic tourism<br />

experience. One of the major advantages of Route 66 is that <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> can also benefit from<br />

the appeal of certain attractions in Zululand, located further up the Route. While Route 66, is largely a<br />

marketing initiative, aimed at presenting tourists with an attractive and neatly demarcated tour<br />

package, product development along the Route is also necessary in order to ‘flesh out’ the skeletal<br />

structure that is Route 66 at present.<br />

4.1. Product Development on Route 66<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Upgrade historical sites and memorials: The British grave site at Gingindlovu is in need of better<br />

maintenance, as is Fort Chelms<strong>for</strong>d and the Grave of John Dunn. The Coward’s Bush monument<br />

could also be better maintained. There is presently no cross at the martyr’s cross memorial, a<br />

cross needs to be re-installed there. 2 Security needs to be improved at the British Military<br />

Cemetery and at Fort KwaMondi in Eshowe.<br />

Upgrading of Fort Nonqayi: The <strong>for</strong>t has underutilised potential. Greater use should be made of<br />

the <strong>for</strong>t as an attraction in itself and to this end, the three turrets should be made accessible to<br />

the public. The museum’s display is also in serious need of an upgrade.<br />

The walk to Mpushini Falls from the Museum Village should be revitalised.<br />

A wide appeal adventure attraction should be developed in one of Eshowe’s <strong>for</strong>ests: The<br />

location of a Canopy Tour in Dlinza <strong>for</strong>est would greatly broaden Eshowe’s tourism appeal.<br />

Mandawe Cross should be improved and refurbished: There are currently plans to make<br />

Mandawe Cross a popular functions and wedding venue.<br />

Development of a Craft Hub on Route 66: The area around Eshowe is well known <strong>for</strong> producing<br />

excellent craftsmen. A craft centre should be established which looks to gather the area’s top<br />

2 At the time of project finalisation a cross had been re-installed at Mandawe cross<br />

Page 40 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

crafters in a centre which exhibits some of the best craft in the country and allows tourists to<br />

watch these craftsmen at work. This craft centre should be of a sufficient scale to become a<br />

significant tourism attraction.<br />

<br />

Encourage the establishment of various SMME’s on the Route: This includes the establishment<br />

of medicinal gardens, nurseries, furniture shops, small restaurants selling Zulu cuisine, and Bed<br />

and Breakfasts.<br />

4.2. Marketing and infrastructure development of Route 66<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Create a narrative <strong>for</strong> attractions: Sites of cultural and historical importance on Route 66 should<br />

be linked by narrative, helping to create a sense of the inter-linkages of history and cultural<br />

interaction on the Route. For example the battle of Gingindlovu preceded the relief of the siege<br />

of Eshowe, and the subsequent battle of Ulundi, which in turn resulted in Cetswayo seeking<br />

refuge in Nkandla Forest and eventually being exiled at Port Durn<strong>for</strong>d.<br />

Adoption of standard signage along the Route: All tourism signage on the route should be<br />

identifiable by a common name or common sign attributes. Standardisation of signage would<br />

reassure tourists that a particular attraction is part of Route 66, and thus convey a certain<br />

expectation of the quality of this attraction or facility.<br />

Mtunzini should be incorporated in Route 66 as a splinter route: The history of Mtunzini, as John<br />

Dunn’s headquarters and as the place of Cetswayo’s point of exile is integral in the history of the<br />

region and, as such, needs to be linked with Route 66 via a splinter route. This route could<br />

travel either south from Mtunzini along the R102 toward Eshowe, or from Mtunzini along the<br />

P240 past Ongoye Forest, to KwaBulawayo and Coward’s Bush.<br />

Tarring of a stretch of road between Pongola and Nongoma: This is essential in getting tour<br />

busses to travel down the R66 into <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Page 41 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

5. Develop Great Forests of Zululand experience<br />

From a tourism perspective, one of the more distinguishable features of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is the<br />

presence of five very scenic indigenous <strong>for</strong>ests. Ongoye, Nkandla, Entumeni, Dlinza and Quedeni <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

provide <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> with an unrivalled competitive advantage when it comes to <strong>for</strong>est ecotourism<br />

in KwaZulu-Natal. Presently, withstanding very basic birding facilities, only Dlinza <strong>for</strong>est has any<br />

significant <strong>for</strong>m of tourism development. This situation represents a waste of excellent raw tourism<br />

assets. Accommodation development at Ongoye Forest and the development of an adventure<br />

attraction at either Dlinza Forest or Entumeni Forest would look to utilise the natural appeal of these<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests to capture a greater share of eco-tourism in the district. For the true tourism benefit of these<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests to be captured however, they must be developed as a total experience and not simply developed<br />

in isolation. Nkandla and Quedeni <strong>for</strong>ests cannot sustain self-sufficient tourism attractions at present<br />

and must be linked to a wider tourist experience or tour. In this respect the concept, advocated by KZN<br />

Wildlife, of a Great Forests of Zululand Tour, would bring Nkandla and Quedeni into the tourism<br />

mainstream, by positioning them as essential stops on a tour encompassing visits to all five <strong>for</strong>ests. The<br />

following basic strategies are indispensible to the success of a Great Forests of Zululand Tour:<br />

5.1. Development of a recognisable brand name<br />

The success of tourism attractions is often dependent on the novelty or uniqueness factor captured in<br />

the name of that attraction. The concept of the Great Forests of Zululand, is a grand one, alluding to the<br />

grandeur of these magnificent habitats. In keeping with the idea of ‘greatness’ and of the linkage with<br />

the’ Zulu’, the tour should look to emphasise the role that these <strong>for</strong>ests played in the history of the Zulu<br />

nation, and specifically of the Zulu Royal family. For instance Ongoye Forest was protected by the Zulu<br />

Royal household due to the ‘medicinal’ value placed on the plants found there. Ongoye was also the<br />

site of Prince (later to become King) Cetswayo’s kraal.<br />

Nkandla has, possibly, an even richer history. Nkandla was home to the nation of iron workers known as<br />

the Chube, who were never conquered by Shaka. The <strong>for</strong>est has also always been the last retreat of the<br />

Zulu, from the time of ‘Shaka to Bhambata’ (KZN Wildlife, 2009) The other three <strong>for</strong>ests, though<br />

perhaps not as historically rich as Ongoye and Nkandla also have much to offer from a historical<br />

Page 42 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

perspective. The Great Forests of Zululand Tour should combine both the natural wonder and incredible<br />

biodiversity (Ongoye is currently rated top biodiversity hot spot in KZN) of the five <strong>for</strong>ests with the<br />

historical legacy of each of these <strong>for</strong>ests. The tour should not simply be another birding route but<br />

should include historical sites (like Bhambatha’s last stand, and Cetswayo’s grave), as well as adventure<br />

activities including zip-lining, and 4×4ing.<br />

5.2. Development of navigable paths<br />

Ongoye, Nkandla and Quedeni and to a lesser extent Entumeni, all have insufficient visitor paths in the<br />

<strong>for</strong>est. While there may be a few not widely known paths used by birders, there are certainly no paths<br />

suitable <strong>for</strong> a broader range of tourists. The Great Forests Tour should be accessible to both those<br />

tourists who want a guided, highly in<strong>for</strong>mative experience, as well as those tourists who are looking <strong>for</strong><br />

adventure and want to do the Great Forest Tour by themselves. In the latter situation, paths need to be<br />

well marked out and detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation boards need to indicate the location of sites of interest within<br />

the <strong>for</strong>est. Visitors, not using a guide should have to sign in with the local reserve manager. Nkandla<br />

<strong>for</strong>est has an extensive system of KZN Wildlife maintenance paths, upon which are a number of sites of<br />

historical interest. These paths should be upgraded and opened to the public, particularly in the context<br />

of a road upgrade to Nkandla Town and the fact that South Africa’s current president is from the area.<br />

5.3. Develop overnight tour itineraries<br />

The table shown below indicates only guided tour packages, which would include transport costs,<br />

accommodation costs and catering. Self-guided tours can build on these suggested itineraries and mix<br />

and match the most suitable tour package <strong>for</strong> them. Self-guided tourists may choose to add visits to<br />

historical and cultural attractions (i.e. Museum Village, Martyr’s Cross, Gingindlovu battle site and<br />

Shakaland) to these suggested itineraries.<br />

Page 43 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Table 3 – Overnight Itineraries<br />

Three Possible Tour Itineraries<br />

Conventional<br />

Extended<br />

Future Conventional<br />

Day 1: Ongoye Forest<br />

Overnight: Eshowe<br />

Day 1: Umlalazi Nature Reserve<br />

Overnight Mtunzini<br />

Day 1: Ongoye Forest<br />

Overnight: A Lodge at Ongoye<br />

Day 2: Dlinza Forest, Mpushini<br />

Falls, Entumeni Forest<br />

Overnight: Eshowe<br />

Day 2: Ongoye Forest<br />

Overnight: Eshowe<br />

Day 2: Dlinza Forest, Mpushini<br />

Falls, Entumeni Forest<br />

Overnight: Eshowe<br />

Day 3: Nkandla Forest<br />

Overnight: Matshenzimpisi<br />

Day 3: Dlinza Forest, Mpushini<br />

Falls, Entumeni<br />

Overnight: Eshowe<br />

Day 3: Nkandla Forest<br />

Overnight: Nkandla Forest<br />

camping/ Matshenzimpisi<br />

Day 4: Quedeni <strong>for</strong>est<br />

Day 4: Nkandla<br />

Overnight: Matshenzimpisi<br />

Day 4: Quedeni Forest<br />

Day 5: Ntingwe Tea Estate,<br />

Quedeni Forest<br />

5.4. Development of campsites and picnic spots<br />

For <strong>for</strong>ests to become popular domestic-resident tourist attractions, necessary facilities will need to be<br />

built. These include picnic spots (as well as necessary ablutions) which can cater <strong>for</strong> families seeking a<br />

‘day out’ and a break from the bustle of large towns like Richards Bay. Campsites under the <strong>for</strong>est<br />

canopies could also prove highly popular attractions <strong>for</strong> both <strong>for</strong>eign and domestic tourists. KZN<br />

Wildlife, are in principle supportive of these developments as long as they are eco sensitive.<br />

Page 44 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

5.5. Create strong linkages with Route 66 and other attractions in the local area<br />

While the Great Forest Tour would hopefully be a strong attraction in and of itself, linking it with the<br />

Route 66 Zulu Culture and Heritage Route would lend even greater publicity to the route. The Great<br />

Forests Tour could act as an offshoot, which one can embark on at Eshowe, of Route 66. The tour would<br />

also enhance the geographic spread of Route 66 which largely bypasses the Nkandla area.<br />

6. Develop Contemporary and Authentic African Cultural <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

The cultural tourism market is a significant one in South Africa and in KwaZulu‐Natal especially, because<br />

of the province’s rich Zulu heritage. Cultural tourism involves tourists visiting human attractions.<br />

“Cultural tourists often want to consume themselves in the contemporary way of life of the destination<br />

they are visiting”. (TKZN, 2009:2) The aim of cultural tourists is to experience a way of life that is<br />

uniquely <strong>for</strong>eign to the way of life which they are accustomed to. As such cultural tourists are most<br />

typically <strong>for</strong>eign tourists as the culture of the destination which they are visiting differs most markedly<br />

with their home countries. Statistics (TKZN, 2009) reveal the popularity of cultural experiences <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>eign tourists: 60% of KZN’s air departure market undertook some <strong>for</strong>m of cultural activity in the<br />

province during their stay. The statistics also reveal the relative unpopularity of cultural activities <strong>for</strong><br />

South Africa’s domestic tourist market, only 10.7% of KZN’s domestic tourist market reported visiting an<br />

African township or cultural village during their stay in the province.<br />

The ‘Zulu culture’ tourism product is well developed within <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>. Simunye Lodge was<br />

recently voted the second best cultural village in the country, while Shakaland and Stewarts Farm have<br />

long proven popular with <strong>for</strong>eign tourists. Cultural villages, however, target a specific segment of the<br />

cultural tourist market. There is a growing segment of <strong>for</strong>eign cultural tourists who view cultural villages<br />

as ‘artificial cultural attractions and experiences’. These tourists tend to seek a rawer and rougher, yet<br />

more genuine cultural experience. On the tourism site, Tripadvisor (2009), where people write of their<br />

experiences at accommodation facilities in a number of countries, a person from the United Kingdom,<br />

on his/her visit to one of KwaZulu‐Natal’s cultural villages referred to the village as a “fake rural Zulu<br />

village” and the staff as “replica Zulus” (Tripadvisor, 2009). Although this sentiment is certainly not<br />

representative of all <strong>for</strong>eign tourists’ experiences, and cultural villages definitely have their place, there<br />

Page 45 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

is a significant demand by <strong>for</strong>eign tourists <strong>for</strong> ‘real’ experiences with Zulu culture. In this regard, tours<br />

which portray contemporary African culture, particularly as seen in rural villages (such as those in<br />

Nkandla) and urban settlements (like Esikhawini), should be more extensively developed in the district.<br />

At present well organised tours of contemporary Zulu villages just outside of Eshowe operate from the<br />

George Hotel under the auspices of Graham Chennells. There is, however, scope <strong>for</strong> significantly more<br />

of these types of tours. A list of possible options is presented below.<br />

6.1 Mzingazi and Nzalabantu settlements northeast of Richards Bay<br />

The settlements at the far end of Lake Mzingazi provide an interesting merging of urban and rural<br />

contemporary African lifestyles. These communities are heavily influenced by the immense presence of<br />

the RBM smelter. Indeed RBM’s corporate social responsibility ef<strong>for</strong>ts are evident throughout these<br />

areas, with a number of RBM funded projects. Some of these projects such as the ‘treepreneurs’,<br />

wherein young entrepreneurs from the community grow indigenous trees which are then sold to the<br />

Willdlands Trust and used in their greening project, already attract small numbers of overseas tourists<br />

interested in community projects in disadvantaged areas. This <strong>for</strong>m of community based tourism is a<br />

growing sector and the opportunity to visit these community-based projects should be extended. The<br />

Mzingazi and Nzalabantu settlements also have the added advantage of being close to Richards Bay and<br />

being located on a possible alternative future tourism route linking Richards Bay and Maphelane.<br />

6.2. Esikhawini and Lake Cubhu settlements<br />

Esikhawini is a large township and probably the best option <strong>for</strong> a township tour experience in <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>. Township <strong>Tourism</strong> is a relatively new, multi-million dollar addition to South Africa’s suite of<br />

tourism attractions. It involves tours of South African townships as well as cultural immersions which<br />

include overnight stays in townships. The idea of township tourism is to provide a glimpse of urban<br />

African culture as people go about their daily business. Its success is based, in part, on the uniqueness<br />

of township life and people’s fascination with the political processes which shaped these communities.<br />

Visiting a South African township, with its unique blend of politics and culture, is an experience unlike<br />

any in the world, and this can lead to a relatively price inelastic demand by <strong>for</strong>eign tourists <strong>for</strong> this<br />

experience. The benefits of township tourism are as follows: it incorporates isolated areas otherwise<br />

Page 46 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

perceived as dangerous, relatively little infrastructure investment is required and the existing resources,<br />

particularly human resources, can be widely utilised. It also “brings the visitors to the hosts”. (Township<br />

Tours, 2004) Township tourism at Esikhawini, however, would have strong competition from Soweto;<br />

Khayelitsha (Cape Town) and Inanda/KwaMashu (Durban), all of which would be easier <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

tourists, arriving at the respective international airports, to visit. The only competitive advantage that<br />

Esikhawini may possess in terms of township tourism is in the Richards Bay cruise ship market. It is thus<br />

important to try and differentiate the township product offered by <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>. In this respect,<br />

the neighbouring settlement around Lake Cubhu offers something quite unique. The Lake itself is a<br />

picturesque setting and the communities abutting the lake are excellent examples of urban fringe<br />

settlement. In addition the Shembe settlement on the shores of the lake is an intriguing cultural<br />

attraction. Esikhawini and Cubhu offered together, thus, <strong>for</strong>m a strong tourism product.<br />

6.3. Nkandla rural settlements<br />

The settlement pattern in Nkandla <strong>Municipality</strong> is very rural, with numerous examples of traditional Zulu<br />

homesteads dotted around the countryside. People in this area today live in much the same manner as<br />

they did centuries ago. A visit to one of the kraals on the Nkandla heights would be an incredibly<br />

evocative cultural experience <strong>for</strong> a <strong>for</strong>eign tourist. This area also has the advantage of being close to<br />

Nkandla <strong>for</strong>est and can boast being the home town of the country’s first Zulu-speaking president. This<br />

latter characteristic should not be underestimated as it draws significant international spotlight on<br />

Nkandla.<br />

Another area with rural and traditional tourism potential is the area around Lake Phobane (Goedetrouw<br />

Dam). Visits to traditional homesteads on the outskirts of the dam, amidst typical Zululand bushveld,<br />

could prove popular with tourists especially if linked to boat trips on the dam and activities at nearby<br />

Shakaland<br />

Page 47 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

6.4. Possible features of African experience tours<br />

Table 4: Features of African Experience Tours in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Features of African Experience Tours in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

1. Home visits Tourists are hosted <strong>for</strong> an hour or two by a local family who will explain<br />

their way of life and daily activities<br />

2. Day to day Tourists will get involved in daily activities such as fetching firewood and<br />

activities<br />

water, farming, home building etc.<br />

3. Community Tourists will have a chance to see how community projects like<br />

projects<br />

‘treepreneurs’ works and will be able to participate in these projects<br />

4. Cultural and Tourists are invited to attend cleansing ceremonies, bull slaughters, church<br />

religious events services, Zionist and Shembe Meetings<br />

5. Visiting a Tourist visit a local sangoma or traditional healer’s house<br />

sangoma<br />

6. Visiting the local Tourists visit the local market on market day, get the chance to bargain<br />

market<br />

and purchase locally made goods<br />

7. Socialising at a Tourists well relax at a local shebeen or tavern, sampling local brews and<br />

shebeen<br />

foods<br />

8. Home stays Tourists will stay overnight (or <strong>for</strong> a few nights) at selected community<br />

members houses.<br />

Key guidelines to be followed:<br />

<br />

Tour guides should be sourced from the local community and trained by professional tour<br />

operators. Guides should be able to converse well in English and should be friendly and<br />

enthusiastic, displaying a sound knowledge of the village/township and the Zulu way of life.<br />

<br />

Community approval and support needs to be secured.<br />

Page 48 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

<br />

Village tours should be coordinated and run by a community tourism organization (CTO), the<br />

CTO should have direct linkages to the offices of various Tourist Routes.<br />

<br />

The safety of tourists should be high priority and it must be ensured that tourists never find<br />

themselves isolated and alone in the village.<br />

<br />

The focus should always be on offering tourists a genuine ‘Rural African Experience’, one which<br />

they would recommend to their fellow countrymen.<br />

<br />

The selection of homes <strong>for</strong> home stays must be thoroughly investigated and the ‘hosts’ must be<br />

highly trustworthy.<br />

7. Develop adventure tourism in the district<br />

The Gap Analysis <strong>for</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> identified the development of adventure tourism<br />

attractions as being a key opportunity <strong>for</strong> the district. <strong>Tourism</strong> KZN (2009) finds that, in 2006, 17% of<br />

<strong>for</strong>eign air departure tourists participated in at least one adventure activity during their stay in the<br />

province. On the domestic front, hiking and mountain climbing is listed by 9.1% of domestic tourists as<br />

an activity they undertook during trips to the province. Domestic tourists also list having participated in<br />

mountain biking and other cycling (2.8%), horse riding (3.9%), a water sport (14.6%) and a sports event<br />

(14.6%). These figures confirm that there is substantial demand from both international and domestic<br />

tourists <strong>for</strong> adventure experiences in KwaZulu‐Natal. <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s terrain and level of<br />

development make it highly conducive to the development of these types of activities. Developing<br />

adventure attractions are a key strategy <strong>for</strong> attracting domestic tourists who are far less likely to visit<br />

the district <strong>for</strong> cultural experiences/attractions than what <strong>for</strong>eign tourists are. Similarly <strong>for</strong>eign tourists<br />

are less likely to participate in adventure experiences unless they are very well organized (due to the risk<br />

associated with getting injured in a <strong>for</strong>eign country) and unless they are truly unique experiences. The<br />

following table shows some of the adventure activities which could be developed in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>,<br />

and where they could be located.<br />

Page 49 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Table 5 – Types of adventure activity<br />

Type of adventure activity<br />

Conventional<br />

Horse Riding<br />

Mountain Biking<br />

Quad Biking<br />

Kayaking<br />

Water sports<br />

Thrill<br />

Zip-lining/foefee sliding<br />

Shark Diving<br />

Paragliding<br />

Sky Diving<br />

Location<br />

Predominantly on coastal routes. Siyaya Coastal Park, Maphelane to<br />

Jolly Rubino. There are also options <strong>for</strong> riding routes from Eshowe to<br />

Ongoye.<br />

Could develop routes at Matshenezimpisi, and in any of the <strong>for</strong>ests in<br />

the district.<br />

In properly demarcated wilderness areas.<br />

On the Umlalazi Estuary, Lake Nhlabane, Lake Eteza<br />

On Lake Phobane, Richards Bay Marina area<br />

Possibilities at Dlinza, Entumeni and Mpushini Falls<br />

Off areas of the coastline, Cape St Lucia<br />

Nkandla heights<br />

Eshowe, Empangeni airfields<br />

8. Improve accessibility and visibility of existing attractions<br />

Adequate road infrastructure is essential <strong>for</strong> the development of tourism in the district. This is especially<br />

the case <strong>for</strong> attracting <strong>for</strong>eign tour groups who typically arrive in large tour buses. As such the roads to<br />

tourist attractions in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> must be of a standard that would cater <strong>for</strong> big tour buses as well<br />

as <strong>for</strong> smaller private vehicles. Poor quality roads are a significant deterrent to tourists looking to<br />

explore new areas. Improvements in road infrastructure may also serve as a stimulus to tourism in<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> by crowding in private sector developments and increasing the footfall of tourists in<br />

the region. Similarly, clear and comprehensive road signage is a key ingredient <strong>for</strong> tourism development<br />

in the district. Tourists travelling privately need the re‐assurances, not to mention the directions, that<br />

good signage provides. Road signage fulfills three important roles: it provides motorists with directions<br />

to destinations which may otherwise be difficult to reach; it acts as a signal of the quality of the tourism<br />

product in an area; and, finally, good signage can function as a very effective <strong>for</strong>m of advertising,<br />

Page 50 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

conveying in<strong>for</strong>mation about a destination to passing motorists. The district has been highly active in the<br />

upgrading of roads in the last few years, with the Shakaland Road, the roads to Ongoye and the road to<br />

KwaBulawayo, having been or in the process of being upgraded. However, tourism development in the<br />

district would further benefit from the following key strategic interventions <strong>for</strong> both road improvements<br />

and signage which are listed below.<br />

8.1. Tourist routes that should be tarred<br />

<br />

The road to Thula Thula. The 3.5km stretch of road between Ntambanana and Thula Thula, is<br />

un-tarred and very rough in places. The current state of this road discourages tour buses from<br />

visiting Thula Thula, despite this being one of the district’s top attractions. Presently this road is<br />

being tarred from the Ulundi side, but this may be a lengthy process, and requires the support<br />

of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> to speed up this process. In the interim the road to Thula<br />

Thula, needs to be graded so that sedans and tour busses can com<strong>for</strong>tably access the reserve.<br />

<br />

Inside Ongoye Forest. KZN Wildlife has plans to lay concrete strips through the <strong>for</strong>est, which<br />

would make the <strong>for</strong>est much more accessible <strong>for</strong> individuals that don’t own 4×4’s. Utilising the<br />

natural asset that is Ongoye Forest is a top tourism priority <strong>for</strong> the district and as such a road<br />

through Ongoye should be strongly supported.<br />

<br />

Sections of the Road from KwaMbonambi turnoff to Maphelane. Maphelane, like Thula Thula, is<br />

one of the district’s top attractions but poses significant access problems <strong>for</strong> visitors. Large<br />

segments of this road, including the final stretch are un-tarred and would make travel there by<br />

sedan very precarious in inclement weather. Both Maphelane and the Jolly Rubino wreck would<br />

benefit from a tarred road.<br />

<br />

The Road into Simunye Lodge. The case <strong>for</strong> a tarred road into Simunye is very similar to that <strong>for</strong><br />

a tarred road into Thula Thula. While Thula Thula’s road is passable, however, Simunye’s is not,<br />

and visitors have to be taken to the lodge by ox wagon, horseback or 4×4. This limits the width<br />

of the appeal of Simunye Lodge and also constrains future growth. As with Thula Thula and<br />

Royal Zulu, a tarred road to Simunye Lodge would be crucial to the development of the Simunye<br />

Project Game Reserve.<br />

Page 51 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

<br />

A section of Route 66 between Pongola and Nongoma. Tour busses coming into the province<br />

from Mpumalanga and stopping at Pongola or Pongola Dam are put off travelling down Route<br />

66 into Zululand and <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> by the condition of a +/-25km stretch of un-tarred road<br />

between Nongoma and Pongola, or Pongola Dam. Instead tour busses remain on the N2,<br />

thereby bypassing the cultural and heritage attractions of Route 66. While this portion of road<br />

is outside the district municipality’s boundaries, it is critical to the success of <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>’s attractions located on Route 66. As the route is a provincial one, <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> should, with Zululand <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>, engage with the province, in an ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

to upgrade this road.<br />

<br />

A section of the road to Ntingwe Tea Estate and Quedeni Forest. (Medium priority) This road is<br />

an un-tarred and precarious, yet highly scenic road. If Ntingwe Tea Estate is to offer tours to the<br />

public and if trails in Quedeni Forest were to be developed then the tarring of this road would<br />

greatly assist.<br />

8.2. Opening up new routes<br />

<br />

Negotiate with RBM <strong>for</strong> servitudes in mining areas. RBM have an extensive system of tarred<br />

roads running from North of Richards Bay to just short of the T-junction with the road from<br />

KwaMbonambi to Maphelane. The ability to use these roads would greatly decrease the untarred<br />

section of road to Maphelane and would directly link the marina area in Richards Bay<br />

with Lake Nhlabane and Maphelane Nature Reserve. RBM are, in principle, open to discussing<br />

the possibility of limited, and regulated, use of these roads by the public. This is especially the<br />

case with the road to the Nhlabane estuary which RBM are willing to open to the public.<br />

<br />

Connect Naval and Pelican islands by bridge. Presently tourists wanting to access Pelican Island<br />

or Alkantstrand Beach from the Tuzi Gazi waterfront are required to take the long way around<br />

via the Mzingazi Canal Bridge. The distance from the waterfront to Pelican Island, via this route,<br />

is 3km while to Alkantstrand Beach it is 3.6km. Linking Naval and Pelican islands will drastically<br />

shorten the distance from the waterfront to Pelican Island and from the waterfront to<br />

Alkantstrand Beach. It will also serve the purpose of creating one continuous linkage between<br />

Page 52 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

the potential Passenger Liner terminal, the waterfront, Naval Island and Alkantstrand Beach.<br />

The islands would need to be linked via bridge, a small portion of which would need to be a<br />

drawbridge to allow <strong>for</strong> yachts to enter and exit the marina. The bridge between Naval and<br />

Pelican Island could also become a significant tourist attraction in-and-of-itself.<br />

8.3. Improving signage to tourist attractions<br />

<br />

More signage to Thula Thula. On leaving Empangeni there is no signage to Thula Thula prior to<br />

turning onto the Heatonville Road. Signs <strong>for</strong> Thula Thula should be installed just outside of<br />

Empangeni, in order to ensure that tourists do not miss the turnoff.<br />

<br />

More signage to Mthonjaneni Museum and Dingane’s Spring. No immediately conspicuous<br />

signage exists on Route 66 <strong>for</strong> the turnoff to Mthonjaneni Lodge; Mthonjaneni Museum;<br />

Dingane’s Spring or the earthen Anglo-Zulu War <strong>for</strong>ts. While there is some signage <strong>for</strong> these<br />

attractions on the hill above the turnoff to Mthonjaneni, this would be very easy to miss and, by<br />

not having the <strong>for</strong>mal appearance of standard tourism markers, does not convey a sense of<br />

reliability to tourists. It is suggested that <strong>for</strong>mal Route 66 tourist signboards, which indicate the<br />

attractions available in this area, be erected.<br />

<br />

Re-install signage to Mpushini Falls. Mpushini Falls in Eshowe was once a fairly popular<br />

attraction <strong>for</strong> both local residents and tourists visiting Eshowe. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately criminal activity<br />

has prevented people from visiting the falls in recent times. As such, in order to dissuade<br />

people from visiting the site, most signage has been removed. If the crime problem is to be<br />

rectified and the falls are to be resurrected as a tourist attraction, then signage which existed in<br />

the past needs to be re-installed.<br />

<br />

Off the road signpost <strong>for</strong> Nyezane Battle Site. On one of the project team’s site visits to the<br />

Eshowe area the Nyezane Battle Site was unable to be located. While there is a prominent<br />

signboard <strong>for</strong> the site on the R66, no further signage leads one to the actual site once the<br />

turnoff has been made. Further, clearly visible, signage must be installed that takes one straight<br />

to the battle site memorial.<br />

Page 53 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

9. Ensure Tourist Safety in Dangerous Areas<br />

In South Africa combating crime is always a crucial tourism strategy. Ensuring tourists’ safety should be<br />

a number one priority <strong>for</strong> the district municipality. If <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> can gain a reputation as a<br />

relatively safe destination in South Africa this would act as a greater attraction than most of the tourism<br />

developments detailed in the preceding pages of this document. Conversely the success of these<br />

selfsame developments hinges on the safety of tourists in the first place. The following two strategies<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e look at ways of establishing <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> as a ‘safe’ tourist destination.<br />

9.1. Policing of identified criminal hotspots at tourist attractions<br />

In many areas of the district attractive seclusion strikes a precarious balance with crime. Pristine,<br />

tranquil areas, primed <strong>for</strong> eco-tourism are often also areas which are considered by many to be highly<br />

dangerous. A number of examples exist:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Lake Nhlabane Estuary<br />

Cape St Lucia<br />

Naval Island<br />

Mpushini Falls<br />

Martyr’s cross and KwaMondi Fort in Eshowe<br />

These areas are key tourist attractions, yet tourist in<strong>for</strong>mation offices regularly discourage people from<br />

visiting these destinations (at least not alone). As such security services should be established at most of<br />

these destinations. Security guards do not need to patrol 24hrs a day (though in the case of Naval island<br />

this would be a good idea), and could instead patrol <strong>for</strong> designated periods, after which time tourists are<br />

strongly discouraged from visiting the site. A key element of better policing in these areas involves<br />

creating safe parking <strong>for</strong> visitors.<br />

Page 54 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

9.2. Creation of ‘safe’ tourism precincts<br />

While tourist’s safety cannot be guaranteed in all areas of the district and discretion needs to be<br />

exercised with respect to which areas are visited and when they are visited, there should be certain<br />

areas where tourists can feel completely safe and relaxed. <strong>Tourism</strong> precincts should be created,<br />

whereby tourists are given top priority and a high level of security <strong>for</strong> tourists exists. As such tourists<br />

should be able to walk around at night without feeling vulnerable, focusing only on enjoying themselves<br />

and prolonging there stay in the district. <strong>Tourism</strong> precincts are found around the world, particularly in<br />

Europe and the USA, and are key to ensuring steady flows of visitors year on year. <strong>Tourism</strong> precincts<br />

have the following features:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Located in areas of high tourism accommodation density<br />

Incorporates high-level surveillance equipment<br />

Has a very visible police presence<br />

Access to non-tourists is closely monitored<br />

Extensive street lighting is provided<br />

The aim of creating safe tourism precincts is so as to manage the risk of crime committed against<br />

tourists on their visits to the district by focusing on tourism safety in areas of high tourist density. In<br />

areas outside of the tourism precincts, tourists would have to use a greater degree of discretion in<br />

timing their visits to certain attractions.<br />

10. Provide More Family Attractions and Facilities<br />

Niche market tourism in the district, namely, birding; fishing; business and cultural activities, tend to be<br />

targeted at individuals as opposed to family groups. This is reflected in the lack of attractions suitable<br />

<strong>for</strong> children in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s tourist areas. Domestic family tourism, however, is a very large<br />

market in South Africa and, as such, family-style attractions and facilities should be developed in the<br />

municipality as a means of attracting a greater number of tourist families.<br />

Page 55 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

12.1 Develop ancillary attractions aimed at children in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s major tourism areas<br />

None of the main tourism towns in the district (Mtunzini, Eshowe, and Richards Bay) could be described<br />

as major family holiday destinations. In each of these towns there is a distinct lack of facilities <strong>for</strong><br />

children. This is not to say that there are no tourism facilities <strong>for</strong> children in these towns, <strong>for</strong> instance<br />

the Dlinza Boardwalk in Eshowe and Reptile City outside of Richards Bay are ideal attractions <strong>for</strong><br />

children, but rather that there is a general deficiency of attractions and facilities <strong>for</strong> children. Richards<br />

Bay, Eshowe and Mtunzini would be more rounded tourism destinations if more of the following<br />

facilities were developed:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Playground areas<br />

Go-kart tracks<br />

Animal petting zoos<br />

Paddling pools and water slides<br />

Paintball courses<br />

Movie theatres and bowling alleys<br />

Miniature train rides<br />

Mini-golf; putt-putt<br />

10.2. Develop a safari-park attraction within the district<br />

In addition to developing ancillary tourism facilities <strong>for</strong> children in the district’s main tourism towns, the<br />

district municipality should also look to create a primary family attraction in the district. A safari park<br />

attraction which would offer eco adventure activities aimed at families, could fill a significant gap in the<br />

district, and indeed the province, when it comes to offering genuine family based attractions. A safari<br />

park should offer more intimate experiences <strong>for</strong> families than that which game reserves, where children<br />

are confined to the inside of vehicles, offer. The safari park should be set in an area of scenic natural<br />

beauty and be populated with non-dangerous game. The park would offer walking paths; horse riding;<br />

picnic sites; themed playgrounds; foefee slides; rock pools; swimming and kayaking in the dam; an<br />

educational awareness centre and possibly an animal nursery or rehabilitation centre. The basic<br />

concept behind the park would be to instil in children an awareness of the environment and to foster a<br />

Page 56 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

love <strong>for</strong> the outdoors. The aim of developing this attraction would be to create KwaZulu-Natal’s premier<br />

family attraction.<br />

11. Promote Events<br />

Events are usually once a year injections of tourism revenue into the district. They are a convenient<br />

way of compensating <strong>for</strong> seasonality in the market <strong>for</strong> holiday tourists. A year round calendar of<br />

tourism events, not only increases tourism revenue in the district <strong>for</strong> the duration of the event but also<br />

enhances the publicity of tourism opportunities in the district. Events are a good way of increasing the<br />

exposure of tourist destinations. <strong>uThungulu</strong> should seek to increase the number of events it has in a<br />

year, taking advantage of a good climate; wide open spaces and beautiful natural surroundings; and a<br />

vast coastline.<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> hosts a wide range of events ranging from business and promotional events like the Zululand<br />

Expo to major fishing events and water sports competitions, to name only a few. While these events<br />

certainly do draw tourists to <strong>uThungulu</strong>, they are not sufficiently large enough to yield the desired<br />

degree of international exposure <strong>for</strong> the district. <strong>Tourism</strong> KZN conduct annual impact studies on the<br />

province’s biggest events, namely, the Comrades and Amashova Marathons; the Midmar Mile; Splashy<br />

Fen Music Festival; the Durban July and the Zulu Reed Dance. What distinguishes these events, with the<br />

possible exception of the last one, is that they are all iconic world-renowned events. As such they<br />

attract a large number of tourists each year. The Comrades Marathon, <strong>for</strong> example was found to<br />

attract 17,682 non-resident participants and 23,317 non-resident supporters in 2010. In total between<br />

R146-247 million was spent by participants and non-resident spectators at the Comrades Marathon.<br />

This represented a large boom <strong>for</strong> the local tourism industry. Furthermore, when asked whether they<br />

would recommend the event to friends and family, 99% of survey respondents answered in the<br />

affirmative. An event like the Comrades has an international profile, and attracts people by weight of its<br />

legendary history and uniqueness. <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should look to encourage these sort<br />

of mass appeal events within the district.<br />

Page 57 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Opportunities <strong>for</strong> events in <strong>uThungulu</strong> include:<br />

<br />

A beach music festival: Unique destination musical festivals such as Splashy Fen in Underberg,<br />

attract visitors from around the country each year. A scenic destination should be sought <strong>for</strong> a<br />

music festival in <strong>uThungulu</strong>. The beach by Dokodweni Ski-boat club and the Prawn Shack could<br />

be an ideal venue <strong>for</strong> a uniquely-styled beach music festival.<br />

<br />

A multi-day cultural event commemorating the history of the Zulu people in the region: This<br />

type of event should be purposely created, with <strong>for</strong>eign tour groups in mind, and should look to<br />

showcase the vibrancy of Zulu culture and the intrigue of Zulu history. Features of the event<br />

should include Zulu dances and musical per<strong>for</strong>mances; educational displays; mini battle reenactments;<br />

traditional food stalls as well as arts and crafts stands The location is important<br />

and should be somewhere easily accessible but scenic and historically significant. In this respect<br />

the Gingindlovu area would be an appropriate location.<br />

<br />

Watersports events: Richards Bay has had a history of hosting various watersports events, but<br />

in recent times has struggled to re-attract these events. With the further development of the<br />

Richards Bay waterfront area, and the extension of tourist services in this area, the city should<br />

make a renewed ef<strong>for</strong>t to re-attract these events, and attract newer bigger events.<br />

<br />

Fishing events: There are already a number of fishing events which take place in <strong>uThungulu</strong>,<br />

these need to be better supported by the district municipality and expanded in scope. To this<br />

end aggressive marketing of these events is essential.<br />

Page 58 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

3.2. Nodal <strong>Tourism</strong> Development <strong>Strategy</strong><br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> development in a district needs to be mindful of the fact that some areas have competitive<br />

advantages when it comes to tourism while others simply do not. Scarcity of resources means that not<br />

all areas can be extensively developed <strong>for</strong> tourism purposes. This is especially the case when<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulating a tourism strategy <strong>for</strong> an entire district. It is the role of local municipalities to fill in the gaps<br />

when it comes to lower level marginal tourism development. However, it is the role of the <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> to identify areas with high tourism potential that will offer cross-cutting benefits <strong>for</strong> the<br />

entire district, and earmark these areas <strong>for</strong> extensive tourism development. In this respect a nodal<br />

tourism strategy provides a spatial context <strong>for</strong> tourism development in the district, prioritising areas<br />

which are expected to have the highest yield <strong>for</strong> investments in tourism. Nodal tourism development<br />

prevents the, at times, fruitless ef<strong>for</strong>ts to find tourism attractions in areas which have little scope <strong>for</strong><br />

tourism. Instead nodal development looks to promote specialisation in areas in which actual potential<br />

exists. The identification and classification of tourism nodes ensures that tourism is made the focus in<br />

smaller but more manageable areas which have relative competitive advantages with regards to tourism<br />

opportunities.<br />

The areas identified as tourism nodes in this strategy are those areas which either, have significant<br />

existing flows of tourists, or have imminently realisable prospects <strong>for</strong> increased tourist numbers. In the<br />

latter respect, the easiest way, in the short-run, to increase tourist numbers to the district is to take<br />

advantage of the significant flows of tourists to popular attractions in neighbouring districts by<br />

developing trans-district tourism products and thereby creating critical mass destinations.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> development nodes are those areas wherein tourist attractions, facilities and infrastructure<br />

should be clustered. Within these nodes, tourism should be given priority and tourists treated as<br />

valuable commodities.<br />

Page 59 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Primary Tourist Nodes in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

1. Richards Bay Marina Area and Waterfront<br />

2. Eshowe and surrounding region<br />

3. Mtunzini/Siyaya Coastal Park<br />

4. Mthonjaneni/ Dingane Spring<br />

5. Thula Thula/ Royal Zulu<br />

Secondary nodes<br />

1. Lake Eteza, Umfolozi Village<br />

2. Nkandla/Matshenezimpisi<br />

Richards Bay Marina and Waterfront<br />

Richards Bay has the highest number of tourist beds in the district as well as the highest occupancy rate.<br />

This is mainly on account of business tourism in the city. Business tourism, however, presents an<br />

excellent foundation from which to tackle other tourist markets. If Richards Bay were to become a more<br />

appealing family destination, business tourists may bring their families on business trips or at least visit<br />

with their families at a later stage. Richards Bay also benefits from having a functioning airport and an<br />

international seaport. The presence of an international seaport, in particular, offers significant<br />

opportunities <strong>for</strong> future increases in tourist numbers as the cruise ship industry grows in Richards Bay<br />

(see Section 3.1 <strong>Strategy</strong> 3). Leisure tourism in Richards Bay, however, is undoubtedly negatively<br />

affected by heavy industry in the town. For this reason only a section of Richards Bay can be considered<br />

to be a genuine tourism node with growth potential. This area would include the Tuzi Gazi Waterfront,<br />

Mzingazi canal and lake, the small craft harbour, Pelican Island, Naval Island and Alkantstrand Beach.<br />

Numerous hotels, guesthouses and restaurants exist in this area already but there is still significant<br />

tourism growth potential. Various tourism projects which would contribute toward making this area a<br />

popular tourist destination, <strong>for</strong> both land-based and cruise tourists are listed below:<br />

Possible tourism projects<br />

Page 60 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Establishment of a safe tourism precinct (see strategy 9)<br />

Construction of multi-purpose passenger liner terminal (see strategy 3)<br />

Construction of a linkage between Pelican and Naval islands (see strategy 7)<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Development of themed Botanic Gardens, amphitheatre and water world on Naval island<br />

Extension of waterfront<br />

Cruises on Lake Mzingazi<br />

Support <strong>for</strong> the Richards Bay Waterfront Development (Mhlatuze Marina Development Plan)<br />

In 2009 the City of Mhlatzue developed a concept plan <strong>for</strong> the development of Richards Bay’s<br />

waterfront. This development, which is planned to supplement current facilities at Tuzi Gazi, will take<br />

place on the north bank of the Mzingazi canal as it enters the bay, and will include Pelican Island; the<br />

NSRI and Water Board premises; the Dredger Berths and Alkanstrand Beach. The primary aim of the<br />

development is articulated as follows: “Conceptually the proposal creates a mixed land use<br />

development that ranges in density and integrates living, working and playing experiences in such a<br />

unique way that the Richards Bay Waterfront will be one of the most sought after addresses in Northern<br />

KwaZulu-Natal”. (PV&E Townplanners, 2009) The development is proposed to include commercial and<br />

residential nodes of varying density, as well as hotels and a theme park. The concept plan is currently<br />

undergoing a consultative process which aims to refine the concept and provide the foundation to<br />

practically implement the vision <strong>for</strong> the area. This process is expected to be complete by September<br />

2011. The Richards Bay Waterfront Development is considered critical to improving the attractiveness<br />

of Richards Bay as a tourist destination and as a premier gateway to <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>for</strong> cruise tourists. It is<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e recommended that the district municipality lend their full support to this project.<br />

Eshowe and surrounding region<br />

Eshowe is the oldest town in Zululand and has a rich repository of historical and cultural attractions. The<br />

town and surrounding areas (Lake Phobane, Entumeni) has a number of accommodation establishments<br />

and is in the centre of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s segment of Route 66. The launch of Route 66, on which a<br />

number of Eshowe’s attractions feature prominently, should give Eshowe the tourism injection it has<br />

Page 61 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

needed <strong>for</strong> the last five years. Eshowe should be marketed as one of the base towns of the Route 66<br />

experience. As such, additional tourism development should look to capitalise on increased tourist<br />

flows associated with the Route.<br />

Possible tourism projects:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Dlinza Forest boardwalk expansion<br />

Canopy tours at either Dlinza, Entumeni or Mpushini Falls<br />

Re-opening Mpushini Falls to tourists<br />

Upgrading of Fort Nonqayi, Martyr’s Cross<br />

Packaging missionary tours<br />

Development of large-scale craft centre<br />

Zulu blonde brewery tours<br />

Mtunzini, Siyaya Coastal Park<br />

Mtunzini is <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s top tourist leisure destination as well as being its fastest growing<br />

destination overall. Though this growth is driven primarily by angling tourists, Mtunzini also has the<br />

potential to position itself as a popular family holiday destination. However, this will require the<br />

development of tourism facilities which would appeal to families and children in particular. While ecotourism<br />

plays an important role in the present appeal of Mtunzini, there is still substantial unexplored<br />

potential <strong>for</strong> this type of attraction. The Siyaya Coastal Park is a pristine coastal conservation area,<br />

which although having much to offer tourists, has seen little tourism development.<br />

Possible tourism projects:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Development of coastal resort in the Siyaya Coastal Park<br />

Development of overnight trails in the Siyaya Coastal Park<br />

Construction of a tidal pool or public swimming facilities at Mtunzini<br />

Development of a John Dunn Interactive Museum in Mtunzini Village<br />

Page 62 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Mthonjaneni/Dingane Spring<br />

This area, on the boundary of the district, would incorporate Mthonjaneni Lodge and Museum,<br />

Dingane’s Spring, the British earthen <strong>for</strong>ts, and the proposed Simunye Game Reserve. The node would<br />

also lie on the most northern section of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s segment of Route 66. While the previous<br />

three nodes that were mentioned had significant existing tourism activity, this area is highlighted more<br />

in regard to its long-term potential. The Mthonjaneni/Dingane’s spring node would look toward<br />

Zululand district to provide significant flows of tourists. This area should position itself as the gateway<br />

to the Valley of the Kings and the starting point <strong>for</strong> visits to eMakhosini, Opathe, UMgungundlovu and<br />

Ulundi, all of which have growing tourism appeal. The node would also look to establish itself as part of<br />

a wider trans-district cultural heritage and wildlife tourism zone.<br />

Possible tourism projects:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Simunye Project creating a Big Five Game Reserve linked to Opathe and eMakhosini<br />

Revival of Dingane’s spring<br />

The opportunity <strong>for</strong> tours of eMakhosini to be run from Mthonjaneni Museum<br />

Further accommodation development at Mthonjaneni<br />

Thula Thula/Royal Zulu<br />

Thula Thula’s international reputation has grown substantially in the last five years and the extra<br />

business from this increased exposure has led to an increase of accommodation at the reserve. The<br />

reserve, having purchased two neighbouring properties, is also set to expand in the next six months.<br />

However, it is not so much Thula Thula’s popularity which should lead to the designation of this area as<br />

a tourism zone but rather the prospect of the Royal Zulu Reserve which would provide a direct linkage<br />

between <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> and the province’s biggest and most popular game reserve, namely,<br />

Hluhluwe Umfolozi. Designating this area as a tourism node would aim to exploit the huge tourism<br />

popularity of this game park.<br />

Page 63 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Possible tourism projects:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Thula Thula’s immediate expansion (dropping of fences with Lavonie and Fundumvelo)<br />

Emphasis on Shaka’s early childhood legacy within the area<br />

Creation of Royal Zulu Reserve and the dropping of fences with Hluhluwe Umfolozi<br />

Lake Eteza/Umfolozi<br />

The area around Lake Eteza and Umfolozi, is perfectly placed <strong>for</strong> tourism development. Lake Eteza is<br />

one of the best aquatic bird watching destinations in KwaZulu-Natal. The lake also boasts small<br />

populations of crocodiles and hippos. On the eastern side of the lake are situated a number of<br />

accommodation establishments, including the Umfolozi Hydro Spa and Umfolozi River Lodge and Bird<br />

Park. There is also a large plot of land which has been fenced and filled with game (including giraffe,<br />

zebra, impala), and is owned by a cooperative of local cane farmers. These farmers do not have any<br />

short term tourism plans, but do not rule out future tourism development which would be done of their<br />

own accord and initiative. The prime reason <strong>for</strong> designating this area as a tourism node is because of its<br />

close proximity to Maphelane Nature Reserve and the popular tourist town of St Lucia. Tourist<br />

attractions situated in this node should look to draw on the surplus pool of tourists in St Lucia.<br />

Possible tourism projects:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Birding tours on Lake Eteza<br />

Makoro trips on Lake Eteza<br />

Development of a safari-park style attraction<br />

Nkandla and Matshenezimpisi<br />

This area has low tourism footfall at present and is not located on, or near any major tourism routes.<br />

However, on account of the State President hailing from this area and the coverage that this brings,<br />

there are significant prospects <strong>for</strong> future tourism growth. This node would look to link the nature<br />

Page 64 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

reserve, accommodation and conference centre at Matshenzimpisi with the intriguing Nkandla Forest<br />

and Zululand’s famous Ntingwe Tea Estate. Traditional tourism initiatives could also be included as part<br />

of the tourism product offered in this node.<br />

Possible Projects:<br />

<br />

Development of public walking trails and historical tours in Nkandla Forest<br />

<br />

Development of further accommodation at Matshenezimpisi<br />

<br />

Designation of Matshenezimpisi as a hunting reserve<br />

<br />

Traditional home visits<br />

<br />

Tours of Ntingwe Tea Estate<br />

Page 65 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Primary <strong>Tourism</strong> Corridors<br />

1. Route 66<br />

2. Nhlabane Corridor<br />

Route 66<br />

Route 66 must be viewed as the primary tourism corridor in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>, and development in the<br />

district should put significant focus on investing in tourism initiatives along this route. Route 66 must be<br />

conceived as the primary artery of the tourism industry in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>. The route has the<br />

potential to attract both international and domestic tourists, as well as cultural, historical, wildlife and<br />

adventure tourists.<br />

Nhlabane Corridor<br />

With the possible closure of RBM’s Tisand mining site, should the EMPR be split, a new tourism corridor<br />

could present itself, linking Richards Bay and Lake Nhlabane. This would provide tourists staying in the<br />

Meerensee area with the opportunity to take a scenic driver to Lake Nhlabane and the Nhlabane estuary<br />

where they can enjoy the activities on the lake and the beauty of pristine, rehabilitated dune <strong>for</strong>ests. In<br />

the longer-run, however, the district municipality should engage in negotiations with RBM to allow <strong>for</strong><br />

the use (even if limited) of its road north of Nhlabane. This would create a continuous corridor linking<br />

Meerensee with Cape St Lucia and Maphelane. The following is a list of advantages of the opening up of<br />

this route:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The route would bypass Richards Bay’s heavy industrial sites around the harbour<br />

It would ease some of the congestion on the John Ross Highway<br />

It would be a significantly shorter route to Maphelane<br />

It could stimulate cultural tourism in the Mzingazi community<br />

It would incorporate attractions at Lake Nhlabane<br />

It would open up the rehabilitated dune <strong>for</strong>ests <strong>for</strong> eco-tourism<br />

Page 66 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

3.3. Emergency Services <strong>for</strong> Tourists<br />

If <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is to host international events, attracting large numbers of tourists, then available<br />

emergency services and attendant infrastructure needs to be comprehensively developed. For the most<br />

part individual tourist emergencies can be catered <strong>for</strong> by regular emergency services, but emergencies<br />

at large scale events or emergencies involving tour groups in transit, need to be catered <strong>for</strong> by specific<br />

emergency plans and services. In preparing <strong>for</strong> the 2010 World Cup, the district engaged in the<br />

development of specialised emergency plans <strong>for</strong> various scenarios which would impact on tourists at<br />

events in the district.<br />

The strategy <strong>for</strong>mulated <strong>for</strong> 2010, specifies ten different disaster scenarios which are identified as<br />

potentially having an impact on major events. In the event of these disasters occurring, checklists<br />

listing applicable responses are provided and would need to be completed by the relevant authority.<br />

The disasters/emergencies identified are as follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Aircraft disasters – including crashes on vacant and occupied land as well as at airports<br />

Collapsed facilities – particularly stands; roofs and temporary structures<br />

Disruption in power supply – causing possible postponement or delays in the event<br />

Disruption in solid waste services – possibly causing health risks and delays<br />

Disruption in waste water services – possibly causing health risks and delays<br />

Disruption in water supply - possibly causing health risks and delays<br />

Fire situations – including runaway fires and the possibility of toxic contamination<br />

Flooding – possibly causing delays or physical risks to tourists<br />

Hazardous chemical spillage – leading to health risks<br />

Major road accidents – collisions involving tourists as well as toxic spillage and damages to roads<br />

In addition to the disaster response checklists, the roles of key services be<strong>for</strong>e, during and after events,<br />

are identified, ensuring that all potential emergencies or disasters scenarios are prepared <strong>for</strong> and, where<br />

it is possible, averted. Disaster management also includes a proposed list of coded and general<br />

messages by security <strong>for</strong>ces; a proposal on how future task teams should operate; and a list of all<br />

possible scenarios <strong>for</strong> disaster management. This latter list includes scenarios of a security nature as<br />

Page 67 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

well as those scenarios <strong>for</strong> which the ten checklists have been developed. The list can be found in the<br />

Appendix C of this document.<br />

Comments on emergency plans<br />

The emergency response and disaster management plans compiled by the district <strong>for</strong> the 2010 FIFA<br />

World Cup event, can be utilised <strong>for</strong> a number of other events in the future, including other sporting<br />

events; as well as concerts and expos. However, the plans <strong>for</strong>mulated <strong>for</strong> 2010 relate mostly to events<br />

which take place in stadia or other large venues and are not necessarily appropriate <strong>for</strong><br />

disaster/emergency scenarios involving tourists not attending a major event. For instance, large tour<br />

groups who are not on their way to any particular event in the district but are visiting a number of<br />

distinct attractions may also encounter situations in which emergency services are required. While<br />

major road and aircraft incidents are covered in the existing emergency strategies, other import risks are<br />

not prepared <strong>for</strong>. These include attacks on tour groups by either terrorists or criminals; tourists trapped<br />

in severe thunderstorms or other natural disasters; tourists embroiled in violent protests; and tourists<br />

involved in shipping incidents (particularly on cruise liners). A complete list of scenarios needs to be<br />

drawn up which includes large tour groups and is not exclusively <strong>for</strong> event attendees. While <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

seemingly has adequate emergency plans and procedures to host international events, there is little<br />

currently in place to deal with tour-group related emergencies. It is the recommendation of this<br />

tourism master plan that such strategies are designed as a high priority. These strategies could include<br />

the following key components:<br />

<br />

Large-scale tour operators should be required to in<strong>for</strong>m the Destination Management Office or<br />

the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> of any imminent tours, and the itineraries of these tours. This would<br />

enable essential services to respond faster in the event of an emergency.<br />

<br />

The district municipality should identify contact people at the embassies of the district’s major<br />

tourist source destinations.<br />

<br />

The district should have a database of possible translators, in the event of an incident involving<br />

tourists speaking <strong>for</strong>eign languages.<br />

Page 68 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Section 4: Deriving Local Benefit from <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

Development<br />

Part of the vision <strong>for</strong> tourism development in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>, expressed in Section 1 of<br />

this strategy document, emphasises the importance of <strong>for</strong>mulating a strategy which maximises the<br />

benefit that local communities derive from tourism development in the district. This vision is<br />

reproduced here:<br />

To ensure that tourism contributes toward local economic development though the active involvement<br />

of communities in tourism projects and the strengthening of linkages with the SMME Sector.<br />

A strategy must be <strong>for</strong>mulated to ensure that tourism development does not simply increase the profit<br />

margins of well established private sector tourism-based companies, but also benefits the local<br />

population, whether directly or via a ‘spill-over effect’. There are three ways in which the benefits of<br />

tourism development can be transmitted to local communities. These are as follows:<br />

<br />

Local entrepreneurship opportunities<br />

<br />

Income derived from community ownership of land or tourism initiatives<br />

<br />

Employment opportunities<br />

Local entrepreneurship opportunities refer to small local businesses which either supply the tourism<br />

industry or <strong>for</strong>m part of the tourism industry’s product offering. Income derived from community<br />

ownership, is that income which is received either as a profit share from a tourism initiative or as<br />

payments <strong>for</strong> the leasing of land. Employment opportunities refer to direct employment in a tourism<br />

initiative or business. Strategies can be <strong>for</strong>mulated, which aim to optimally maximise each of these<br />

tourism benefit flows.<br />

Page 69 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

4.1 <strong>Strategy</strong> 1 - Expanding the <strong>Tourism</strong> Skills Base<br />

Problem Statement 1:<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has the benefit of having the University of Zululand within its borders.<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Graduates from the University number between 70-80 students, as well as additional Honours<br />

and Masters Graduates. These Graduates are highly skilled and are qualified <strong>for</strong> tourism planning jobs,<br />

of which there are very few in the district. As such <strong>Tourism</strong> Graduates frequently tend to leave the<br />

district in search of suitable work. While there may be a lack of demand <strong>for</strong> highly skilled individuals,<br />

there is a growing demand <strong>for</strong> skilled individuals, with diplomas, who can work in the hospitality and<br />

tour segments of the tourism industry. To this end Umfolozi College, have in the past, provided highly<br />

competent people <strong>for</strong> a range of tourism jobs in the district. The dropping of the Diploma (or N) system<br />

and the adoption of the National Certificate Vocational system, however, has significantly weakened the<br />

quality of tourism qualification from the campus. <strong>Tourism</strong> establishments are thus caught in a position<br />

where the University of Zululand Graduates are too qualified and the Umfolozi College Graduates too<br />

under-qualified, to employ. The <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should thus motivate with the Department of<br />

Education to provide additional funding <strong>for</strong> Umfolozi College to offer N-courses in tourism again, or the<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> could fund these courses itself.<br />

Key Intervention 1: Support the re-introduction of tourism diploma courses at Umfolozi College<br />

Problem Statement 2:<br />

Academic tourism skills may be relatively abundant in the district, but practical tourism skills are lacking.<br />

Firstly there are no specialised hotel schools in the district where people can receive practical training in<br />

hotel management, and hospitality. Secondly no one from <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> has ever received training<br />

as an Adventure Guide. This deficiency in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s tourism skills base needs to be addressed<br />

if the district is to promote adventure attractions.<br />

Key Intervention 2: Employ the Adventure Qualifications Network to train adventure tourism guides in<br />

the district<br />

Page 70 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Problem Statement 3:<br />

A shortage of tourism jobs should not be prohibitive to finding working in the tourism industry, because<br />

(at least a percentage) of skilled individuals should be able to start their own tourism business. The<br />

reason <strong>for</strong> such little entrepreneurial initiative, however, by skilled individuals in the district is indicative<br />

of a shortage of entrepreneurial and project management skills.<br />

Key Intervention 3: Provide entrepreneurship and project management courses <strong>for</strong> individuals wanting to<br />

establish tourism businesses<br />

This strategy does not just concern tourism graduates, but also uneducated individuals looking to set up<br />

a tourism related business. As such it must also be seen as part of the strategy described below.<br />

4.2 <strong>Strategy</strong> 2 - <strong>Tourism</strong> SMME and Supply Chain Development<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong><br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> KZN is a key driver of economic development and assisting SMME’s in both supplying tourism<br />

services to customers and supplying existing tourism service providers with goods and services.<br />

Guidelines <strong>for</strong> SMME support need to be developed in order to assist SMME’s and spread the benefits of<br />

tourism revenue to a wider community. Many tour operators and accommodation facilities are simply<br />

unaware of the SMME and community tourism opportunities surrounding them and a successful SMME<br />

policy seeks to redress this issue and open the market <strong>for</strong> SMME operatives.<br />

SMME development can serve as a source of trans<strong>for</strong>mation in the tourism industry. <strong>Tourism</strong> KZN<br />

(2009) lays out the following key monitoring tools to assess SMME growth:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

% increase in the number of SMME businesses supported.<br />

% increase in budget spent on SMME service providers.<br />

% increase in training and capacity building interventions.<br />

Page 71 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

The three key ways that an overarching body such as <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> can provide SMME assistance<br />

are:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Advisory services to SMMEs and Community <strong>Tourism</strong> Organisations<br />

Skills Development focussed on SMME and Community <strong>Tourism</strong> Organisations<br />

Monitor and encourage SMME compliance within larger tourism based companies in the district<br />

Advisory Services<br />

A centre <strong>for</strong> promoting ‘start-up businesses’ with business planning assistance would give SMMEs and<br />

communities with tourism ideas and plans the opportunity to present their plan to an expert who can<br />

assist them in finding the correct sources of finance, provide business planning assistance and give<br />

advice <strong>for</strong> overcoming other obstacles to entering the market. This would include allowing the SMMEs<br />

to market their establishment or product, overcome land tenure issues and find suitable business<br />

partners where necessary.<br />

Community based tourism operations in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> have often been unsuccessful and this is<br />

mentioned in the next section. However as part of the advisory services offered, a document on the<br />

guidelines <strong>for</strong> community based developments needs to be drafted which looks into the reasons <strong>for</strong><br />

these failures and ways of mitigating these issues. This document can serve as a guideline <strong>for</strong> future<br />

SMME developments. Additionally, operators of SMME businesses and community tourism operations<br />

should be encouraged to visit successful community and SMME run operations.<br />

Mentorship programmes are an opportunity <strong>for</strong> existing and successful tourism operations to assist<br />

SMME operations nearby and advise them on operational issues. Linking SMMEs to existing businesses<br />

and fellow SMME’s is crucial to their growth. SMME supply chains to local service providers can be<br />

greatly enhanced by the provision of a database of suppliers of goods and services at a local level. This<br />

type of database would go beyond merely listing tourism operations and also list those companies which<br />

are potential goods and services suppliers to the industry.<br />

Page 72 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Areas the database should cover:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Accommodation Providers<br />

Food providers<br />

Service Providers<br />

Function Providers<br />

Cultural Attractions<br />

Arts & Crafts Attractions and suppliers<br />

Tour Services and other SMME tourism activities<br />

All service providers should provide their locations and maps of services should include their operational<br />

areas. Such a database should be available on the municipal website and distributed to all<br />

accommodation facilities in the district. Currently this study has provided a comprehensive list of<br />

accommodation facilities in the district and would be an excellent basis <strong>for</strong> starting this database.<br />

Local Municipalities would need to survey service providers and provide this in<strong>for</strong>mation to the <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>. A comprehensive list of this nature would provide LED officers in the local municipalities<br />

the opportunities to engage with SMME’s and assist them in accessing local markets.<br />

Skills Development<br />

SMME skills development is a key factor in their success and there are two providers of tourism based<br />

education in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

<br />

<br />

The University of Zululand<br />

Umfolozi College (Eshowe Campus, Esikhawini Campus, Richtek Campus)<br />

These institutions could be utilised to provide SMME owners and employees with the opportunity to<br />

take courses which facilitate training and capacity building interventions <strong>for</strong> SMMEs. The municipality<br />

needs to facilitate such training by providing venues, advertising and accessing funding from <strong>Tourism</strong><br />

KwaZulu-Natal.<br />

Page 73 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Monitor and Encourage Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) Compliance<br />

In order to promote the business benefits of the <strong>Tourism</strong> BEE Scorecard these benefits need to be well<br />

known throughout the industry in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>, but the district municipality also needs to ensure<br />

that BEE compliance is as easy as possible. The database of SMME suppliers would encourage BEE<br />

scorecard compliance.<br />

Table 6 – SMME <strong>Strategy</strong> Summary<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> Suggested Intervention Potential Benefits<br />

Advisory Services <strong>Tourism</strong> Business Planning<br />

Offices<br />

Formulation of successful<br />

model <strong>for</strong> community-run<br />

tourism initiatives<br />

Site visits to successful<br />

operations<br />

Skills Development Training <strong>for</strong> SMMEs provided<br />

by resident training facilities<br />

in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Mentorship Programme<br />

Linking SMME’s with larger<br />

tourism operations through<br />

database of SMME and all<br />

other tourism operations in<br />

the district<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Increased SMME and<br />

community based<br />

tourism initiatives<br />

which are successful<br />

in the long term.<br />

Trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Greater customer<br />

satisfaction with<br />

SMME operators<br />

More efficient<br />

SMME operators<br />

Expansion of SMME<br />

operations<br />

Trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Encourage BEE<br />

<br />

Educate businesses on<br />

<br />

Increased use of<br />

compliance<br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> BEE compliance<br />

SMME’s in the<br />

<br />

Increase access to BEE<br />

supply chain<br />

compliance through database<br />

<br />

Trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

of compliant companies<br />

Page 74 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

4.3 <strong>Strategy</strong> 3 - A Framework <strong>for</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> Development on<br />

Community Owned Land<br />

The track record of tourism development on community owned land in <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is mostly<br />

dismal. Promising developments such as Shangri-La, north of Mtunzini, Iphiva Lodge on Lake Phobane<br />

and the chalets on the beach near Port Durn<strong>for</strong>d have all failed. Some relatively minor initiatives such as<br />

the coastal fishing camp site near Lake Nhlabane and numerous craft stalls continue to operate, but<br />

these are small scale enterprises creating little in the way of full-time employment. The one shining<br />

exception is Simunye Lodge near Melmoth. For improved success <strong>for</strong> tourism developments on<br />

community owned land in the future it is important to take the example of Simunye Lodge and other<br />

successful tourism ventures on community owned land from elsewhere in Africa and build on the<br />

lessons learnt from these successes.<br />

Key to success in the few exceptional instances is that the facilities, whilst community owned, are<br />

managed and run by a managing agent, who are tourism professionals, namely Protea Hotels, in the<br />

case of Simunye Lodge. It simply will never work to award operating responsibility to an inexperienced<br />

and untrained individual or group of individuals chosen from within the community by the community.<br />

Furthermore, <strong>for</strong> every venture established on community owned land it is critical that the managing<br />

agent has access to a separate flow of funds to cover initial investment, operating costs and the costs of<br />

sustaining the business (including maintenance and replacement of assets as these wear out or are<br />

damaged).<br />

It is equally important, of course, that the community, as land owner, also enjoys an equitable flow of<br />

funds representative of the value of the land leased to the tourism development, together with training<br />

and employment opportunities and a profit share commensurate with any capital invested in addition to<br />

the land. Also important, is the need to ensure that the flow of funds to the community is directed to a<br />

properly constituted trust or not-<strong>for</strong>-profit organisation with robust governance structures in order to<br />

ensure that the funds earned by the community from the land lease and any investment in the tourism<br />

development are deployed to the community in a manner that has the full support of the entire<br />

beneficiary community.<br />

Page 75 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Any payments due to government structures such as the SA Revenue Service, municipalities, the<br />

KwaZulu-Natal <strong>Tourism</strong> Authority, tribal authorities, the Ingonyama Trust, skills and education training<br />

authorities, unemployment insurance fund and compensation fund must also be clearly identified and<br />

provided <strong>for</strong>.<br />

Graham Muller Associates recommend that future tourism developments on community owned land in<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> be structured in this fashion. Obviously, the details will vary <strong>for</strong> each development<br />

according to the needs and preferences of the parties involved, however, the following are seen as key<br />

elements critical to the success of tourism developments on community owned land:<br />

1. The appointment of professionally qualified and experienced management agents with a long –<br />

term commitment to the development of at least twenty years to ensure sustainability<br />

2. Clear distinctions between funds flowing to<br />

a. the community as land owner;<br />

b. investors (possibly including the community);<br />

c. the managing agent;<br />

d. employees<br />

e. government structures (rates, taxes, levies and the like)<br />

3. Robust governance structures <strong>for</strong> the management of all funds flowing to the community as a<br />

collective entity<br />

The opportunities <strong>for</strong> sustainable tourism developments on community owned land in <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> are considerable. These will be successfully realised only if practical and sensible structures are<br />

put in place to realise this potential. The benefit to communities will be a sustainable stream of rentals,<br />

profits shares, jobs and training.<br />

Page 76 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Section 5: Business Plans<br />

Project Name:<br />

Project Location:<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong>:<br />

Strategic Rationale <strong>for</strong><br />

Project:<br />

Rationale <strong>for</strong> Project’s<br />

Location:<br />

Project Aims:<br />

Forest Canopy Tours<br />

PROJECT DETAILS<br />

Eshowe (Dlinza Forest or Mpushini Falls or Entumeni Forest)<br />

Umlalazi Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

The tourism gap analysis <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> finds that<br />

the district is lacking in adventure tourism products. Adventure<br />

attractions appeal both to <strong>for</strong>eign and domestic tourists and face<br />

relatively inelastic demand whereby tourists are prepared to pay high<br />

prices <strong>for</strong> unique adventure experiences.<br />

Canopy tours have proven successful throughout the country, and can be<br />

found in the Tsitsikamma, Magaliesberg, Karkloof and, recently, the<br />

Drakensberg. These attractions draw large numbers of tourists. The<br />

Canopy Tours at Tsitsikamma is by far the most popular, while Karkloof<br />

Canopy Tours in KwaZulu-Natal draws close to 10,000 participants a year.<br />

The development of this type of attraction in an area will greatly<br />

enhance the appeal of the area’s tourism product and will also attract a<br />

new set of tourists to the region.<br />

The development of Canopy Tours in Eshowe would have a number of<br />

advantages:<br />

<br />

Eshowe is an established tourist destination in the district<br />

Eshowe has tourism capacity. The Dlinza boardwalk has 5,000<br />

visitors a year, the Museum Village: 7,000 and Shakaland 5,500<br />

<br />

Eshowe can provide a number of accommodation options<br />

Eshowe is located on Route 66<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The Canopy Tours could be linked with visits to the Museum<br />

Village, Dlinza Boardwalk and Martyr’s Cross<br />

Eshowe has three locations which could be suitable <strong>for</strong> the<br />

development of Canopy Tours<br />

There is already a precedent <strong>for</strong> tourism development in Dlinza<br />

Forest as well as existing infrastructure in the <strong>for</strong>est<br />

The aims of developing a canopy tour attraction in Eshowe are as<br />

follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

To provide <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> with a viable adventure tourism<br />

option<br />

To arrest the recent decline in visitor numbers at Eshowe’s major<br />

attractions<br />

To add a new dimension to the Route 66 tourism product<br />

Page 77 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Target Market:<br />

Category:<br />

Project Description:<br />

Domestic and <strong>for</strong>eign adventure and eco-tourists<br />

Forest<br />

A Canopy Tour Development would involve constructing a number of<br />

high plat<strong>for</strong>ms amongst the <strong>for</strong>est canopy. These plat<strong>for</strong>ms would be<br />

linked to each other by steel zip-lines. Participants are taken to the first<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>m, harnessed onto the zip line and from this plat<strong>for</strong>m glide<br />

through the <strong>for</strong>est canopies to each subsequent plat<strong>for</strong>m. At each<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>m, participants are unhooked from the previous zip-line and<br />

harnessed onto the new one. Participants control how fast they glide<br />

through the air by pulling down on their line with their gloved hand.<br />

The zip-lines can be up to 200m long, and number between 8 (Karkloof)<br />

and 13 (Drakensberg). Participants are provided with snacks at one of<br />

the plat<strong>for</strong>ms and a light lunch afterwards. Depending on the number of<br />

zip-lines, the tour takes between 2.5-3hrs. The price charged is between<br />

R400-R450 per person.<br />

The development of Canopy Tours will entail:<br />

Construction of plat<strong>for</strong>ms<br />

Installation of steel cables<br />

A small office area<br />

A place to store equipment<br />

A kitchen<br />

Ablutions<br />

Requirements:<br />

Direct employment<br />

generation during<br />

operations:<br />

Project Cost:<br />

Project Driver:<br />

Status<br />

An advantage of locating the Canopy Tours in Dlinza Forest is that certain<br />

infrastructure, like an office and ablutions, already exists<br />

For construction<br />

A fair degree of elevation in the <strong>for</strong>est<br />

Tall, sturdy trees<br />

Accessibility<br />

For operational feasibility<br />

Must have at least 5,000 participants per year <strong>for</strong> viable profit<br />

margin to be reached<br />

Must have the potential to reach 10,000 participants per year<br />

16 employees (substantial portion can be locally trained)<br />

R2million-R3million (depending on difficulty of terrain, number of zip<br />

lines and existing infrastructure)<br />

Private Sector, supported by Parks Board<br />

Current Status of Project<br />

The project is only in the conceptual phase, and requires considerable<br />

further research, including a feasibility study and an environmental<br />

Page 78 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Feasibility Study?<br />

Business Plan?<br />

Project Leader<br />

Ownership:<br />

impact assessment.<br />

No<br />

No<br />

Canopy Tours SA<br />

Local franchisee<br />

Contact Persons<br />

Principal Stakeholder:<br />

Name:<br />

Mark Brown<br />

Organisation:<br />

Canopy Tours SA<br />

Phone: 082 453 3970<br />

Email:<br />

mark@canopytour.co.za<br />

Other Key Stakeholders:<br />

Name:<br />

Graham Keet<br />

Organisation:<br />

KZN Wildlife<br />

Phone: 083 225 2992<br />

Email:<br />

keetg@kznwildlife.co.za<br />

Role of the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Interventions<br />

The development of Canopy Tours would be funded privately, and, once<br />

complete, handed over to a franchisee who would take ownership of the<br />

operation. It is suggested that the private sector run the Canopy Tours.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> can, however, encourage the development of<br />

Canopy Tours in Eshowe by funding the initial conceptualisation study<br />

and even, the subsequent Environmental Impact Assessment. The cost<br />

of these studies could otherwise prove to be prohibitive to the<br />

development of what could be a lucrative tourist operation.<br />

3-Year Budget Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Prioritisation<br />

R15,000 - R20,000<br />

(conceptualisation<br />

study)<br />

Important<br />

R100,000<br />

(EIA, pending approval<br />

of first study)<br />

R2 million<br />

(Canopy Tour<br />

development and<br />

inception)<br />

Page 79 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Project Name:<br />

Project Location<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Strategic Rationale <strong>for</strong><br />

Project:<br />

Rationale <strong>for</strong> Project<br />

Location:<br />

Project Aims:<br />

Target Market:<br />

Category:<br />

Project Description:<br />

Development of Siyaya Hiking Trail<br />

PROJECT DETAILS<br />

Siyaya Coastal Park<br />

Umlalazi Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has very little coastal tourism<br />

development, despite having a 100km+ coastline, which in many parts is<br />

untouched and consists of pristine dune <strong>for</strong>ests. There is thus ample<br />

space <strong>for</strong> an eco-tourism initiative along the district’s coastline. While<br />

the Western and Eastern Cape have a number of overnight coastal trails,<br />

most famous of which is the otter trail, KwaZulu‐Natal currently has<br />

none. This constitutes a significant gap in KwaZulu-Natal’s tourism<br />

product, a gap which <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> is in a perfect place to fill.<br />

The development of overnight coastal trails will require very little capital<br />

investment and makes optimum use of the ecological tourism appeal of<br />

parts of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s coastline.<br />

Two trail routes were identified in the <strong>Tourism</strong> Gap Analysis <strong>for</strong> the<br />

district, namely, Maphelane to the Jolly Rubino and Umlalazi to<br />

Amatikulu. While both of these routes represent viable opportunities, it<br />

is felt that only one should be initially developed so as to gauge the<br />

popularity of these hikes. The route from Umlalazi to Amatikulu has the<br />

following advantages:<br />

It is located in the environmentally protected Siyaya Coastal<br />

Park<br />

The beach in this area is widening annually<br />

It links two established nature reserves and estuary systems,<br />

Amatikulu and Umlalazi<br />

There is significant tourism activity in neighbouring Mtunzini<br />

The Siyaya Coastal Park is considered to be very safe<br />

The word ‘siyaya’ means ‘we go to’ which is very marketable<br />

KZN Wildlife currently have plans to build rest huts in the area<br />

The Prawn Shack is located on the route<br />

The aims of developing coastal hiking trails in the Siyaya Coastal Park are<br />

as follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

To create an iconic eco-tourism attraction in the district<br />

To provide a unique experience <strong>for</strong> tourists within KZN<br />

To utilise the latent potential of the district’s coastline<br />

Mostly <strong>for</strong>eign and from other provinces, eco-tourists<br />

Coastal<br />

The ‘Siyaya Hike’ would start at either Umlalazi Nature Reserve in<br />

Mtunzini or at the Amatikulu Nature Reserve. Hikers would register at<br />

either of these nature reserves and get assigned an armed ranger, who<br />

Page 80 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

would serve both as a tourist guide and as protection from wild animals<br />

and criminals. The trail would be about 24km long, incorporating coastal<br />

dune <strong>for</strong>est trails, beach trails and 5km of kayaking on the Amatikulu<br />

estuary. Different options which cater <strong>for</strong> the varying fitness levels of<br />

different groups of tourists would need to be provided. The more<br />

strenuous option would include only 1 night’s accommodation on the<br />

route, while the easier option would require two night’s accommodation<br />

on the route. Hikers would also spend at least one night at either<br />

Amatikulu or Umlalazi Nature Reserves.<br />

KZN wildlife currently have plans to build a rustic camp 11km south of<br />

Umlalazi Nature Reserve, and, are in principle, supportive of the idea of<br />

using these huts as a hiking camp. The huts would be very basic reed<br />

structures, with a concrete floor, fireplace, and basic beds and would be<br />

able to sleep 12. They would constitute the perfect first night stop from<br />

either Amatikulu or Umlalazi Nature Reserve on the more strenuous<br />

hiking option.<br />

Requirements:<br />

Direct Employment<br />

Generation During<br />

Operations:<br />

Project Cost:<br />

Project Driver:<br />

Ownership:<br />

Status<br />

Feasibility Study?<br />

Business Plan?<br />

Other accommodation options include those surrounding the Prawn<br />

Farm, like the Nkwazi Camps. In total, tourists could spend up to 5 nights<br />

in the region, simply because of the coastal trail.<br />

For construction:<br />

Path development and maintenance<br />

Concrete floor reed huts<br />

Communal kitchen<br />

Water storage facilities<br />

Access dirt road<br />

4 specialised guides (rest of staff can be sourced from the two nature<br />

reserves)<br />

R500,000 (<strong>for</strong> rustic camp)<br />

R300,000 (path development)<br />

Parks Board, Public Sector<br />

KZN Wildlife<br />

Current Status of Project<br />

The development of overnight trails in the Siyaya Coastal Park is still at a<br />

conceptual phase. However, KZN Wildlife does have basic plans <strong>for</strong> the<br />

construction of a rustic camp in the area.<br />

No<br />

No<br />

Page 81 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Principal Stakeholder:<br />

Name:<br />

Organisation:<br />

Contact Persons<br />

Richard Penn-Sawers<br />

KZN Wildlife<br />

Phone: 082 559 2868<br />

Email: -<br />

Other Key Stakeholders<br />

Name:<br />

Ronell Hulley<br />

Organisation:<br />

Umlalazi <strong>Tourism</strong> Association<br />

Phone: 035 473 3474<br />

Email:<br />

ronel@umlalazi.org.za<br />

ROLE OF THE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

Interventions<br />

The coastal hiking trails should be established and operated by KZN<br />

Wildlife. However, the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> could provide the initial<br />

investment in infrastructure <strong>for</strong> the rustic hiking camp. Subsequent path<br />

maintenance should be the responsibility of KZN Wildlife.<br />

3-YearBudget Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Prioritisation<br />

R300,000 (trail<br />

development)<br />

Important<br />

R500,000 (rustic camp<br />

set-up)<br />

R500,000 (promotion<br />

of trail, inception)<br />

Page 82 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Project Name:<br />

Project Location:<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong>:<br />

Strategic Rationale <strong>for</strong><br />

Project:<br />

Rationale <strong>for</strong> Project’s<br />

Location:<br />

Nseleni Conference Centre and Accommodation<br />

PROJECT DETAILS<br />

Nseleni Nature Reserve<br />

Mhlatuze Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Although Richards Bay is a significant business tourist destination within<br />

the province, there are few independently-run facilities catering <strong>for</strong> the<br />

needs of business tourism within the town. Most conference facilities in<br />

Richards Bay are attached to accommodation establishments, typically<br />

located in Meerensee, or, are part of the in-house facilities offered by<br />

the industrial corporations. A few years ago the conference centre at the<br />

Nseleni Nature Reserve burnt down. The facility has recently been<br />

rebuilt but still has no nearby accommodation. There is thus an<br />

opportunity to develop accommodation options in the Nseleni Nature<br />

Reserve. Such a facility would present businessmen/women with the<br />

opportunity to enjoy pleasant natural surrounds while attending a<br />

conference in Richards Bay. It would also tap into the passing traveller<br />

market, by providing cheap and easily accessible accommodation on the<br />

side of the N2.<br />

Richards Bay is situated relatively far off the N2 to be able to capture<br />

passing motorists who may be looking <strong>for</strong> a place to spend the night.<br />

The N2 is a major transportation route <strong>for</strong> tourists, and those driving<br />

from Durban to Pongola or vice a versa, may be tempted to stay<br />

overnight somewhere close to the road if this was possible. Nseleni<br />

Nature Reserve has access straight off the N2, and is an ideal place to<br />

develop accommodation. Indeed KZN Wildlife report that they<br />

frequently receive calls enquiring as to whether there is accommodation<br />

at Nseleni Nature Reserve. The main advantages of building<br />

accommodation at Nseleni are:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Nseleni Nature Reserve has excellent access to the N2 and can<br />

tap into the passing traveller market.<br />

The Reserve is very scenic and provides a great alternative to<br />

holding conferences in Richards Bay town<br />

The conference facility has been well used here in the past.<br />

Project Aims:<br />

The aims of developing accommodation at Nseleni Nature Reserve are as<br />

follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

To provide a comprehensive conferencing experience in<br />

Mhlatuze <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

To utilise the natural appeal of Nseleni Nature Reserve<br />

To capture a share of the passing traveller market<br />

Page 83 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Target Market:<br />

Category:<br />

Project Description<br />

Requirements<br />

Direct Employment<br />

Generation in<br />

Operations:<br />

Project Cost:<br />

Project Driver:<br />

To combine conferencing and accommodation in a scenic setting<br />

Domestic: Business tourists and passing travellers looking <strong>for</strong> overnight<br />

accommodation<br />

Nature Reserve<br />

Six basic KZN Wildlife self-catering chalets should, initially, be built. They<br />

should be located as far from the N2 within the reserve as possible, but<br />

be easily accessible by any type of vehicle and also be easily accessible<br />

from the conference centre. Each chalet should have its own rowingboat<br />

which can be used on the scenic Nseleni River.<br />

Funding requirements<br />

KZN Wildlife in conjunction with Mhlatzue <strong>Municipality</strong> will need<br />

to raise the additional funds <strong>for</strong> the development of<br />

accommodation in the Reserve.<br />

5 (two security guards; 1 manager; 2 cleaning staff)<br />

For six accommodation units: R10 million<br />

Parks Board, Public Sector<br />

CURRENT STATUS OF PROJECT<br />

Status The conference centre has been re-built and re-opened. At present<br />

there are no plans to develop accommodation in the reserve but KZN<br />

Wildlife are, in principle, agreeable to this.<br />

Feasibility Study?<br />

Business Plan?<br />

Project Leader:<br />

Ownership:<br />

Principal Stakeholder:<br />

Unknown<br />

Yes<br />

KZN Wildlife<br />

Name:<br />

Roy Jones<br />

Organisation:<br />

KZN Wildlife<br />

Phone: 082 559 2852<br />

Email: -<br />

Co-owned: Mhlatuze <strong>Municipality</strong> and KZN Wildlife<br />

CONTACT PERSONS<br />

Other Key Stakeholders:<br />

Name:<br />

Cedric Koekemoer<br />

Organisation:<br />

Mhlatuze Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Cell: 035 907 5000<br />

Email:<br />

koekemeorc@richemp.org.za<br />

Page 84 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

ROLE OF DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

Interventions:<br />

3-Year Budget<br />

(accommodation)<br />

Prioritisation<br />

This project will be led by KZN Wildlife. However, KZN wildlife will only<br />

develop the limited conference facility they have planned to, with no<br />

accommodation, unless they receive additional funding. Because this<br />

project will predominantly serve the interests of Mhlatuze <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

and has relatively few cross-cutting benefits <strong>for</strong> the other municipalities,<br />

it is suggested that the local municipality rather than the district<br />

municipality provide the additional funding <strong>for</strong> this project. <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>’s role then is to encourage Mhlatuze Local <strong>Municipality</strong> to<br />

support the project.<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

R300,000 (EIA Study) R5 million R5 million<br />

Medium<br />

Page 85 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Project Name:<br />

Project Location:<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong>:<br />

Rationale <strong>for</strong> Project and<br />

Strategic Importance of<br />

Project’s Location:<br />

Project Aims:<br />

Target Market:<br />

Category:<br />

Project Description:<br />

Simunye Project<br />

PROJECT DETAILS<br />

North of Melmoth<br />

Mthonjaneni Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

For rationale behind the development of a Big Five Reserve in the district<br />

see Section 3.1, <strong>Strategy</strong> 2.<br />

The Simunye Project represents a viable option <strong>for</strong> the establishment of<br />

a community-owned Big Five Game Reserve within <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

The land has been sold to the Department of Land Affairs and<br />

subsequently given over to the community. With the assistance of the<br />

original land owners, Protea Hotels and the backing of Land Affairs, the<br />

project offers an excellent opportunity <strong>for</strong> tourism development in the<br />

district to directly benefit local communities.<br />

6,000ha of land has been fenced and is already registered as a game<br />

reserve. There is potential to extend this to 12,000ha in the future. This<br />

would make the introduction of lions to the reserve possible, thereby<br />

creating a big Five Game Reserve which would be 70km closer to the<br />

new international airport than what Hluhluwe-Umfolozi is. The longterm<br />

vision is <strong>for</strong> this game reserve to link up with Opathe Game Reserve<br />

and the Emakhosini Heritage Park, creating a 38,000ha game reserve.<br />

The combined Game Reserve would straddle Route 66 and lend huge<br />

weight to the product that Route 66 offers tourists. The Reserve would<br />

also look to tap into the rich flows of tourists to the heritage sites in the<br />

Valley of the Kings and in Ulundi.<br />

The aims of supporting the Simunye Project are as follows:<br />

To create a large-scale Big Five Game Reserve attraction in<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

To create a primary, anchor attraction on Route 66<br />

To stimulate the tourism industry in Mthonjaneni <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

To assist in creating a wildlife/heritage tourism node<br />

To show the benefits of tourism development <strong>for</strong> local<br />

communities<br />

Predominantly <strong>for</strong>eign tourists looking to mix both a heritage and wildlife<br />

experience<br />

Game Reserve<br />

The Simunye Project entails the development of the tourism potential of<br />

a large area of land in Mthonjaneni Local <strong>Municipality</strong> which was<br />

recently handed over to the local community. This development involves<br />

the fencing of wilderness areas and the registration of these areas as<br />

Page 86 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Requirements<br />

Direct Employment<br />

Generation in<br />

Operations:<br />

Project Cost :<br />

Project Driver:<br />

game reserves. Four lodges, in partnership with Protea Hotels, are being<br />

established on this land at present. These lodges are predominantly old<br />

farmhouses which are to be extensively refurbished and remodelled.<br />

The long-term perspective is that once the Simunye Project land is linked<br />

with Opathe and Emakhosini, these lodges would act as premium tourist<br />

game lodges, owned by the community and run by Protea Hotels.<br />

As the driver of the project, Simunye Lodge requires extensive<br />

upgrading:<br />

Upgrade staff quarters<br />

Upgrade reception area<br />

Expand conference capacity<br />

Further staff training and development<br />

New equipment<br />

Better road access (currently inaccessible <strong>for</strong> non-4×4’s)<br />

Uncertain, but extensive<br />

R40-R60 million (game fencing, animal stocking, lodge refurbishment)<br />

Community, Public Sector<br />

Status:<br />

Feasibility Study?<br />

Business Plan?<br />

Project Leader:<br />

Ownership:<br />

CURRENT STATUS OF PROJECT<br />

The project is in an advanced stage, the preliminary research has been<br />

done, 6,000ha game reserve fenced and registered and a partnership<br />

with Protea Hotels has been secured.<br />

Uncertain<br />

Yes<br />

Leitch Trust<br />

Community<br />

CONTACT PERSONS<br />

Principal Stakeholder:<br />

Name:<br />

Nick Leitch<br />

Organisation:<br />

Leitch Trust<br />

Cell: 082 076 9828<br />

Email:<br />

nick@itarmy.co.za<br />

Other Key Stakeholders:<br />

Name:<br />

Department of Land Affairs<br />

Organisation: -<br />

Cell: -<br />

Email: -<br />

Page 87 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Interventions<br />

ROLE OF THE DISTRICT MUNICPALITY<br />

The Simunye Project is a collaboration between the Leitch Trust, the<br />

local community and the Department of Land Affairs. Extensive research<br />

has gone into the project and the project is in an advanced stage.<br />

Additional funding, however, still needs to be sourced. The project’s<br />

benefits are cross-cutting across municipalities and catalytic to the<br />

success of Route 66, and it is thus recommended that the <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> provide substantial assistance in helping the Project source<br />

funding from the likes of the Development Bank of South Africa and from<br />

Ithala Bank.<br />

In addition the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> should tar the road to Simunye<br />

Lodge as this is set to be the gateway to the Game Reserve, and would<br />

pose a major hindrance to tourists if it remains un-tarred.<br />

Budget Allocation Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Prioritisation<br />

Timeframes<br />

R20 million (game<br />

stocking and reserve<br />

establishment)<br />

Very Important<br />

R20 million (first<br />

phase accommodation<br />

construction)<br />

Year 1: Establishing and stocking 12,000ha game reserve<br />

Year 2: Development of premium quality lodges<br />

Year 3: Development of premium quality lodges<br />

Year 4: Dropping of fences with Opathe/Emakhosini<br />

R20 million (second<br />

phase accommodation<br />

construction)<br />

Page 88 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Project Name:<br />

Project Location:<br />

Local <strong>Municipality</strong>:<br />

Rationale <strong>for</strong> Project and<br />

Strategic Importance of<br />

Project’s Location:<br />

Royal Zulu Game Reserve<br />

Between Heatonville and Umfolozi Game Reserve<br />

Ntambanana Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

For rationale behind the development of a Big Five Reserve in the district<br />

see Section 3.1, <strong>Strategy</strong> 2.<br />

The Royal Zulu Game Reserve Project entails the creation of a joint,<br />

private sector-community, owned Game Reserve abutting the Hluhluwe-<br />

Umfolozi Game Reserve. The Project’s intention is to distribute the<br />

benefits of wildlife tourism to the local communities which, although<br />

having lived in the area <strong>for</strong> such a long time, have received little benefit<br />

from Hluhluwe-Umfolozi Game Reserve. In so doing the intention of the<br />

project is also to raise awareness among local communities of the value<br />

of wildlife in KwaZulu-Natal.<br />

The Royal Zulu Project is important from two perspectives. Firstly it links<br />

wildlife tourism with the internationally recognised ‘Zulu’ name and,<br />

secondly, it looks to position itself as the gateway to Hluhluwe-Umfolozi<br />

Park. In the second respect the project has the potential to capture large<br />

numbers of tourists, who would otherwise bypass the district in order to<br />

access Hluhluwe-Umfolozi from either Zululand or Umkhanyakude<br />

<strong>District</strong>s.<br />

Project Aims:<br />

Target Market<br />

Category<br />

The Royal Zulu Project also has international pulling power due to the<br />

popular personality of Lawrence Anthony who has gained international<br />

fame with his exploits in Baghdad and on account of the best-selling<br />

books he has written. Royal Zulu benefits from both Lawrence Anthony’s<br />

reputation and Thula Thula’s rising popularity.<br />

The aims of developing the Royal Zulu Reserve are as follows:<br />

To create a mega-game reserve in the region (118,000ha)<br />

To move Hluhluwe-Umfolozi’s entrance into <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>,<br />

and significantly closer to the new international airport<br />

To distribute the benefit of wildlife tourism more equitably<br />

To link the Zulu Royal Household with wildlife tourism in the<br />

district<br />

Predominantly <strong>for</strong>eign, though also intra-provincial, wildlife tourists<br />

Game Reserve<br />

Project Description See Section 3.1, <strong>Strategy</strong> 2.<br />

Requirements Need backing <strong>for</strong> Project from Department of Land Affairs<br />

Require water piping <strong>for</strong> Fundumvelo Reserve<br />

Road to Thula Thula needs to be tarred, or at least graded in the<br />

interim<br />

Page 89 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Direct Employment<br />

Generation During<br />

Operations:<br />

Project Cost<br />

Project Driver<br />

Status:<br />

Feasibility Study?<br />

Business Plan?<br />

Project Leader:<br />

Ownership:<br />

Unknown, but likely to be extensive<br />

Training of locals <strong>for</strong> game ranging and hospitality jobs<br />

Unknown<br />

Community, Private Sector<br />

Current Status of Project<br />

Advanced. Negotiations with community largely finalised, fencing on<br />

some plots has taken place, awaiting authorisation from Department of<br />

Land Affairs with regard to Ntambanana State Farms<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Earth Organisation<br />

Partnership: Community and private investors<br />

CONTACT PERSONS<br />

Principal Stakeholder:<br />

Name:<br />

Lawrence Anthony<br />

Organisation:<br />

Earth Organisation, Thula Thula<br />

Cell: 083 294 2940<br />

Email:<br />

thula@netactive.co.za<br />

Other Key Stakeholders: -<br />

Name: -<br />

Organisation: -<br />

Cell: -<br />

Email: -<br />

Interventions:<br />

Budget Allocation<br />

ROLE OF THE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

The development of the Royal Zulu Reserve has funding lined up and is<br />

ready to proceed if given the go ahead by the Department of Land<br />

Affairs. This process could be speeded up if supported by the <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>. In support of the project the district should:<br />

Attend Royal Zulu meetings<br />

Motivate the importance of the project with the Department of<br />

Land Affairs<br />

Provide piped water <strong>for</strong> Fundumvelo Nature Reserve<br />

Object to the construction of more power lines through the<br />

Royal Zulu Area<br />

Grade road to Thula Thula and ensure that the tarring of the<br />

road from Ulundi continues at a decent pace<br />

Unknown (cost of water infrastructure at Fundumvelo, road grading)<br />

Page 90 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Prioritisation<br />

Timeframe<br />

Very Important<br />

Year 1: Consolidation of land and game fencing<br />

Year 2: Construction of new lodges<br />

Year 3: Dropping of fences with Hluhluwe-Umfolozi<br />

Project Name:<br />

Project Location:<br />

Rationale <strong>for</strong> Project and<br />

Strategic Importance of<br />

Project’s Location:<br />

Project Aims:<br />

Target Market:<br />

Category:<br />

Project Description:<br />

Siyaya Coastal Resort<br />

PROJECT DETAILS<br />

Siyaya Coastal Park, Tommage Pan<br />

See Section 3.1, <strong>Strategy</strong> 1<br />

The aims of developing a coastal resort in the Siyaya Coastal Park are as<br />

follows:<br />

To develop a popular coastal resort <strong>for</strong> the province<br />

To utilise <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s coastline <strong>for</strong> tourism purposes<br />

To attract <strong>for</strong>eign tourists to <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

To create a pristine beach/eco-tourism experience<br />

Foreign tourists (mainly middle-age and older)<br />

Coastal<br />

The Siyaya Coastal Resort would be located among pristine coastal dune<br />

<strong>for</strong>ests with near-exclusive access to 15km of wide sandy beaches. The<br />

resort would have up to 20 secluded bungalows each sleeping four. Each<br />

bungalow would have its own double-seater kayak <strong>for</strong> use on the<br />

Amatikulu estuary. The resort would include:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

A main building (housing: a reception area, gym and fitness<br />

centre, function room, restaurant and kitchen, bar, TV lounge<br />

and library.<br />

A pool area (with infinity pool, bar area and tropical restaurant)<br />

A themed spa and beauty centre<br />

A playground<br />

Archery range<br />

Stables<br />

The guiding principle behind the design of the resort is to provide<br />

tourists with an understated but luxurious secluded beach experience.<br />

All buildings will be designed to merge easily with the natural<br />

environment.<br />

Requirements: Community support and land use<br />

Agreement <strong>for</strong> community/private partnership<br />

Extensive EIA process<br />

Page 91 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Project Cost (estimated)<br />

Project Driver<br />

R60 million (total)<br />

Private Sector, Community<br />

Status:<br />

Feasibility Study?<br />

Business Plan?<br />

Project Leader<br />

Ownership:<br />

CURRENT STATUS OF PROJECT<br />

The project is only in the conceptual phase, and requires considerable<br />

further research, including a feasibility study and an environmental<br />

impact assessment.<br />

No<br />

No<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Joint ownership: Community and Private Investors<br />

No Contact Persons at Present<br />

ROLE OF DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

Interventions<br />

The development of a coastal resort in the Tommage Pan area of the<br />

Siyaya Coastal Park should be undertaken as a partnership between the<br />

local community and private investors. However the <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> should look to attract private interest by facilitating the<br />

interaction between private investors and the local community and by<br />

funding the feasibility study and subsequent environmental impact<br />

assessment. This will open the door <strong>for</strong> private investors who otherwise<br />

may not have taken the risk of extensive capital outlay <strong>for</strong> these costly<br />

processes.<br />

3-Year Budget Allocation Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Prioritisation<br />

R50,000 (feasibility<br />

study)<br />

Medium importance<br />

R300,000 (an EIA<br />

should an investor<br />

undertake the project)<br />

R10 million (first<br />

phase construction)<br />

Page 92 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Project Name:<br />

Project Location:<br />

Local Municipalities:<br />

Rationale <strong>for</strong> Project and<br />

Strategic Importance of<br />

Project’s Location:<br />

Project Aims:<br />

Target Market:<br />

Category:<br />

Project Description:<br />

Great Forests Tour<br />

PROJECT DETAILS<br />

All of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s major <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

Nkandla and Umlalazi Municipalities<br />

See Section 3.1, <strong>Strategy</strong> 5<br />

The aims of developing a Great Forests Tour are as follows:<br />

To make use of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s greatest competitive<br />

advantage in tourism, namely, <strong>for</strong>est tourism<br />

To integrate Nkandla <strong>Municipality</strong> in a wider tourism product<br />

To combine heritage tourism and eco-tourism and uncover the<br />

historical legacy of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong>’s Great Forests<br />

To provide a unique and iconic experience <strong>for</strong> tourists in<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

To create a strong brand name and package<br />

A mixture of <strong>for</strong>eign and domestic eco-tourists<br />

Forest<br />

The Great Forests of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> Tour looks to create a singular<br />

tourism experience out of presently isolated tourism destinations. The<br />

tour will take visitors on insightful trips into the heart of <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong>’s five <strong>for</strong>ests, Nkandla, Ongoye, Quedeni, Dlinza and Entumeni.<br />

These trips will emphasise the biodiversity within these <strong>for</strong>ests and the<br />

differences between them, as well as the historical legacies of the <strong>for</strong>ests<br />

and their place in Zulu culture. The tourism appeal of each <strong>for</strong>est,<br />

though inextricably linked to the other <strong>for</strong>ests on the tour, will need to<br />

be suitably advanced to ensure a world class product. This will<br />

necessitate path and infrastructure development at certain <strong>for</strong>ests.<br />

The main thrust of this project, however, is to market a must-do<br />

experience <strong>for</strong> tourists. As such branding and advertising is very<br />

important.<br />

For possible itineraries see General <strong>Strategy</strong> 5.<br />

Requirements: Improvement of access routes at Ongoye, Nkandla and Quedeni<br />

Development of public walking paths<br />

Development of campsites and picnic spots<br />

Identification of sites of historical importance<br />

Strong promotion with tour operators and at airports<br />

Direct employment Unknown (but will require tour guides, and maintenance staff)<br />

generation during<br />

operations:<br />

Page 93 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Project Cost<br />

Project Driver<br />

Unknown<br />

Public Sector, Parks Board<br />

Status:<br />

Feasibility Study?<br />

Business Plan?<br />

Project Leader:<br />

Ownership:<br />

CURRENT STATUS OF PROJECT<br />

The project is still at a conceptual phase although KZN Wildlife has, in the<br />

past, done in<strong>for</strong>mal research into the feasibility of this project.<br />

No<br />

No<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> and KZN Wildlife<br />

CONTACT PERSONS<br />

Stakeholder:<br />

Name:<br />

Graham Keet<br />

Organisation:<br />

KZN Wildlife<br />

Cell: 083 225 2992<br />

Email:<br />

keetg@kznwildlife.co.za<br />

Interventions<br />

ROLE OF THE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY<br />

The development of the Great Forests of <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> Tour is a<br />

tourism initiative which cuts across municipalities and has the potential<br />

to add to the existing Route 66 experience. It must be considered to be<br />

catalytic to tourism development in isolated areas like those around<br />

Nkandla, Ongoye and Quedeni Forests. While it is the role of KZN<br />

Wildlife to maintain and improve facilities at these <strong>for</strong>ests, it should be<br />

the role of the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> to develop the Great Forest<br />

experience. This will involve:<br />

Providing financial support to KZN Wildlife <strong>for</strong> the development<br />

of trails, access roads within the reserves, campsites and picnic<br />

spots<br />

The branding of the Great Forests Experience/Tour<br />

Seeking partnerships with accommodation establishments<br />

Providing linkages to Route 66<br />

Marketing Great Forests Experience to Tour Operators<br />

3-Year Budget A Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Prioritisation<br />

R300,000 (Feasibility<br />

Study and EIA)<br />

Very Important<br />

R3 million (project<br />

initialisation)<br />

R300,000 p.a.<br />

(recurrent spending<br />

on marketing and<br />

promotion)<br />

Page 94 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Section 6: Per<strong>for</strong>mance Management<br />

This section sets out some tools by which the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the tourism industry in the district can be<br />

monitored and enhanced. Three tools <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance management are elaborated on here. These<br />

are, namely, a proposed service excellence award system <strong>for</strong> the district; future research projects to<br />

measure growth in the tourism industry; and a set of per<strong>for</strong>mance management indicators which can be<br />

used to assess the level of progress in achieving the aims of this Master Plan.<br />

6.1. Service Excellence Award System<br />

In recognising that “tourism is the epitome of a service industry” and that it “is absolutely essential<br />

to....institute programmes to improve these levels”, TKZN introduced a service excellence programme<br />

<strong>for</strong> tourism providers in the province at the beginning of 2002. The annual award ceremony has<br />

subsequently become a major event <strong>for</strong> tourism establishments in KwaZulu-Natal. A <strong>Tourism</strong> Award<br />

System is a way of recognising tourism providers which consistently offer world-class services and<br />

facilities. It also acts as an incentive <strong>for</strong> tourism providers to strive to attain and then sustain high levels<br />

of service excellence. Service excellence is pivotal in improving the tourism image of a destination.<br />

High levels of service provision and hospitality can, at times, even compensate <strong>for</strong> limited physical<br />

attractiveness of a destination. Conversely poor service can leave a lasting bad impression <strong>for</strong> tourists<br />

even in the most unique locations.<br />

While a service excellence award system exists <strong>for</strong> the province, the scale is such that <strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

establishments often do not feature on the shortlists <strong>for</strong> the major prizes. This is both a result of the<br />

extent (being the entire province) and quality of the competition in major tourist destinations like<br />

Durban and the Elephant Coast. A district service excellence award system would provide far greater<br />

incentive <strong>for</strong> tourism providers in <strong>uThungulu</strong>. The basic setup <strong>for</strong> such an award system could be based<br />

upon the successful provincial award system. The key element of the TKZN service excellence awards is<br />

that participants must be registered with TKZN. As such <strong>for</strong> a service award system of this sort to work<br />

in the district, it is critical that it is aligned with the proposed Destination Management Office (DMO) <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> (see Marketing <strong>Strategy</strong>). Participation should be limited to those service providers who are<br />

Page 95 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

registered with the DMO.<br />

Participation in the district’s service excellence awards should not be<br />

compulsory. In the TKZN model tourism providers wanting to participate in the awards nominate<br />

themselves. The TKZN model is briefly described below:<br />

TKZN Service Excellence Awards Model<br />

KZN tourism providers wanting to participate in the service excellence awards are required to complete<br />

an online entry <strong>for</strong>m, which is judged on the following criteria:<br />

1. Describe your project/business or nominated service in terms of its history, growth and nature.<br />

2. Give an example how you “delivered service excellence” to make your guest's/client's visit<br />

special.<br />

3. Motivate why your entry should be considered to win this award.<br />

4. Indicate how you or your nominated service provider, apply the following concepts in your<br />

project/business.<br />

- Promotion of business to clients, users and customers<br />

- Improving service to tourists<br />

5. Include 4 referrals (guests/clients/members of the public) together with their contact details.<br />

(TKZN, 2010)<br />

A panel of judges thereafter adjudicate the entries received and nominees are shortlisted using a shortlisting<br />

score card. The judging panel then conduct surprise visits of the short-listed candidates<br />

businesses. Alternative judging panels are used <strong>for</strong> different award categories. Each panel contains<br />

experts and authorities in the chosen category. Based on the per<strong>for</strong>mance of providers during the<br />

surprise visit, and on the quality of the written entry and referrals, winners and runners-up in each<br />

category are announced. The winner of the respective categories receives a prize of R10,000 and is<br />

featured on TKZN’s website.<br />

Page 96 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Challenges related to the TKZN service excellence award model<br />

The major challenge <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> in instituting a service excellence award model like that used by<br />

TKZN, is that tourism providers have to put in quite a lot of ef<strong>for</strong>t and be proactive in nominating<br />

themselves. It is likely that many tourism establishments simply do not have the time to undertake<br />

entering <strong>for</strong> the service awards. This is not a major problem at a provincial level as the sample<br />

population is so large that meaningful decisions can still be made. However, at a district level nonproactive<br />

service providers can result in an inefficiently small sample size. In order to overcome this<br />

challenge the DMO will need to be very active in promoting the service awards and encouraging<br />

providers to participate. Alternatively another model is specified below:<br />

Alternate service excellence award model<br />

In this model tourist providers would not be required to nominate themselves, but rather all providers<br />

registered with the district DMO would automatically be entered <strong>for</strong> the awards. If a provider does not<br />

wish to be part of the award programme they can state this when they renew membership. The<br />

defining feature of this model is to introduce a double-layered adjudication process. In the first round,<br />

online tourist reviews could be used to obtain a weighted rating <strong>for</strong> the establishment/service. The<br />

DMO website should provide tourists with the opportunity to rate registered accommodation<br />

establishments, tour operators; attractions and restaurants. As an alternative, links could be provided<br />

to established tourism-review websites like TripAdvisor. Weighted scores <strong>for</strong> providers with a threshold<br />

number of reviews will be calculated. The best per<strong>for</strong>ming providers in their respective categories will<br />

thereafter be shortlisted, and a judging panel will pay surprise visits to the shortlisted candidates.<br />

Winners and runners-up will be judged on the basis of the weighted tourist reviews and on the findings<br />

of the panel’s surprise visits.<br />

Challenges related to the alternate service excellence award model<br />

The major challenges associated with this model is establishing an efficient online review facility, and<br />

attaining high enough tourism response rates.<br />

facilities according to their category.<br />

Another challenge is ensuring that reviewers rate<br />

Page 97 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Either model is workable but the Destination Management Office (when established) will need to make<br />

a final decision as to which model is most appropriate, based on available human resources and the<br />

sophistication of the DMO website. Under both models it is recommended that the award categories<br />

are kept to a minimum. The prizes <strong>for</strong> each award will have to be decided by the DMO based on<br />

available finances.<br />

Award Categories (TKZN, 2010)<br />

Accommodation<br />

Hotel of the Year - Provides accommodation to the travelling public, has a reception area, and offers at<br />

least a “breakfast room” or communal eating area. In general, a hotel makes food and beverage services<br />

available to guests, and these may be outsourced or provided by the hotel.<br />

B&B/ Guest House of the Year<br />

Bed & Breakfast - accommodation is provided in a family (private) home and the owner/manager lives<br />

in the house or on the property. Breakfast must be served. Bathroom facilities may or may not be ensuite<br />

and/or private. In general, the guest shares the public areas with the host family.<br />

Guest House - can be an existing home, a renovated home or a building that has been specifically<br />

designed to provide overnight accommodation. A guest house will have public areas <strong>for</strong> the exclusive<br />

use of its guests. A guest house is a commercial operation enterprise and as such the owner or manager<br />

may live on the property.<br />

Self-catering/ Backpackers establishment of the Year<br />

Self-catering - a house, cottage, chalet, bungalow, flat, studio, apartment, villa, houseboat, tent or<br />

similar accommodation where facilities and equipment are provided <strong>for</strong> guests to cater <strong>for</strong><br />

themselves. The facilities should be adequate to cater <strong>for</strong> the maximum advertised number of residents<br />

the facility can accommodate.<br />

Backpackers & Hostelling - an establishment which provides communal facilities including a<br />

dormitory. It may also offer a range of alternative sleeping arrangements and cater <strong>for</strong> transient guests.<br />

Page 98 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Lodge of the Year<br />

Lodge - an accommodation facility located in natural surroundings. The rates charged are usually<br />

inclusive of all meals and the experience offered at the lodge including game drives or battlefield tours.<br />

Tour operating<br />

Tour Operator of the Year<br />

A tour operator is any person who owns a business which transports paying tourists on scheduled<br />

itineraries and makes arrangements <strong>for</strong> their clients in terms of accommodation, transport and<br />

excursions. These businesses often own vehicles to transport tourists and the owners of these<br />

enterprises often accompany tour parties.<br />

Most Innovative <strong>Tourism</strong> Project<br />

This award is presented to a deserving service provider who offers unconventional and unique tourism<br />

experiences or services.<br />

Restaurants<br />

Elegant dining restaurant of the year (Established /Emerging)<br />

Family restaurant of the year (Established / Emerging)<br />

Traditional restaurant of the year (Established/ Emerging)<br />

A restaurant or other eating house is a business that concentrates on selling meals, and may or may not<br />

be licensed to sell liquor <strong>for</strong> consumption on the premises. These broad categories ensure that all dining<br />

establishments in KwaZulu-Natal have the opportunity to enter. Please note that each restaurant may<br />

only enter in one category.<br />

Page 99 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

6.2. Future research projects to measure growth in the local<br />

tourism industry<br />

It is important <strong>for</strong> there to be ongoing research in the field of tourism within the district. This Master<br />

Plan cannot be relied on solely <strong>for</strong> insight into the district’s tourism industry over the next five to ten<br />

years. Rather various tourism research projects which measure the growth and development of the<br />

district’s tourism industry need to be undertaken on a regular basis, as means of evaluating the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of tourism in the district. These research projects need to be spearheaded by either the<br />

district municipality’s tourism officers or the Destination Management Office <strong>for</strong> the district. Five<br />

critical research projects are identified below:<br />

1. Annual tourism provider surveys: In order to ascertain the status quo of tourism in the district, the<br />

Master Plan process involved undertaking a tourism provider survey. This survey was targeted at<br />

tourism accommodation owners; tour operators and managers of tourist attractions in the district.<br />

Questions were aimed at ascertaining the nature of the tourist market in the district, including their<br />

composition and habits (such as activities pursued in the district) as well as the average stay of<br />

tourists at establishments. A number of supplier based questions were included in the survey such<br />

as the number of beds offered by the establishments; the number of people employed at the<br />

establishment and the pricing structures used by the providers. Additionally demand-side<br />

questions relating to the average number of visitors per day and the estimated occupancy rates<br />

were asked. 70 responses to the survey were received and these were of immeasurable help in<br />

deriving a picture <strong>for</strong> the status quo of tourism in the district. It is there<strong>for</strong>e recommended that an<br />

annual tourism provider survey is undertaken by the district’s proposed Destination Management<br />

Office. The survey can be used to construct up-to-date tourism supplier databases <strong>for</strong> the district.<br />

It can also be used to provide yardsticks (occupancy and visitor rates) by which growth in the<br />

industry can be measured. A requirement of membership of the DMO should be that members<br />

complete the survey at the beginning of each financial year.<br />

2. Tourist exit surveys: While most visitors to <strong>uThungulu</strong> arrive and leave by personalised motor<br />

vehicle transport, there are some which leave at distinct ports of exit. These are, namely, tourists<br />

flying from Richards Bay Airport to Johannesburg and cruise ship tourists re-embarking on a<br />

Page 100 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

passenger liner. These tourists are far easier to survey than road-transported tourists and can<br />

provide valuable insights into how tourists have experienced the district. Questions which should be<br />

asked should include those relating to their nature of stay or visit to the district; their overall<br />

impression of the district (from surrounds to service); their opinions as to what can be done better<br />

to position <strong>uThungulu</strong> as a major tourist destination; and whether they will return and recommend<br />

the district to others. These surveys should be regular and can be undertaken over the period of a<br />

few months in order to obtain a sufficiently large sample.<br />

3. Establish a tourist review system: This project would relate to the previous section on service<br />

excellence, and could be used as the basis <strong>for</strong> short listing tourism providers <strong>for</strong> specific awards.<br />

Ideally there should be a facility on the DMO website whereby tourists can rate the service they<br />

received in the district. These reviews could be used to monitor the levels of service excellence in<br />

the district and point to potential areas where the district can improve.<br />

4. A Review of all tourism-related community projects pursued in the district over the last 10 years:<br />

The Master Plan process revealed a disturbingly high failure rate of tourism-related community<br />

projects within the district. While this is certainly not unique to <strong>uThungulu</strong> and is a feature of<br />

community tourism across the province, the various failures or successes of community tourism<br />

projects need to be understood so as not to replicate the same mistakes. The exact reasons <strong>for</strong> the<br />

failure of some of these projects (such as Iphiva Lodge) need to be clearly understood. At the same<br />

time the factors underpinning the success of community projects like Simunye Lodge must be<br />

identified <strong>for</strong> further use in future community projects. The findings of this study should add to the<br />

framework <strong>for</strong> effective community tourism as elucidated earlier in this Master plan document.<br />

5. Event impact studies: In addition to acting as a promotional tool <strong>for</strong> tourism in the district, events<br />

have multiplier impacts <strong>for</strong> the local economy. These impacts need to be understood in order to<br />

know how better to extract maximum tourism value from these events. For instance the Zululand<br />

Expo attracts people from across the province which then require overnight accommodation and<br />

food, all of which act as an injection of value into the local economy. However, the magnitude and<br />

extent of this injection of value and whether it has grown historically is unknown, and this lack of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation about the impacts of events hinders the planning of future tourism events.<br />

Page 101 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

6.3. Monitoring and Evaluation<br />

In order to ensure that the objectives of this Master Plan are met, a set of time-specific goals are set out in the table following:<br />

Monitoring and Evaluation Tool<br />

General Objectives <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>Tourism</strong> Growth<br />

Increase overnight stays in<br />

the district<br />

Enhance the per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

of attractions<br />

Increase tourism-related<br />

employment<br />

Grow the contribution of<br />

tourism to the district<br />

economy<br />

Increase number of cruise<br />

tourists<br />

Increase community<br />

tourism<br />

Key Indicator<br />

Annual<br />

accommodation<br />

occupancy rates<br />

Annual day visitor<br />

numbers<br />

Percentage<br />

contribution of<br />

tourism to district GDP<br />

Number of cruise ship<br />

stops per annum<br />

Goal / Timeframe<br />

To increase the average district occupancy rate by 5% (to 54%) in the next five years.<br />

To increase the occupancy rate in uMlalazi, in particular by 10% (to 46%)<br />

To arrest the annual decline in visitor numbers at a number of the district’s attractions<br />

and target positive visitor growth of 5% per annum<br />

To attain a 9% contribution of tourism employment to total employment in the district<br />

economy by 2015<br />

To attain a tourism contribution of between 8-10% to district GDP by 2015<br />

Through effective destination marketing and management, to increase the number of<br />

cruise ship stops by 2 ships per annum over the next five years<br />

To develop two successful community tourism projects in the district by 2016<br />

Page 102 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Specific development objectives Key Responsibility Goal/Timeframe<br />

Regain Blue Flag status <strong>for</strong><br />

Alkantstrand<br />

Construct a multi-purpose<br />

passenger terminal<br />

including conference<br />

facilities and retail options<br />

Secure a beach music<br />

festival<br />

Develop a major kids<br />

attraction<br />

Achieve a safe tourism<br />

precinct in Richards<br />

Bay(Waterfront Area to<br />

Alkantstrand)<br />

Develop cultural tours of<br />

Esikhawini/Cubhu<br />

Develop a major craft<br />

centre on the R66<br />

Development of Canopy<br />

Tours<br />

uMhlatuze<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

uMhlatuze<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>;<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>; Transnet<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

uMhlatuze<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

uMhlatuze<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

uMlalazi <strong>Municipality</strong>;<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong><br />

uMlalazi <strong>Municipality</strong>;<br />

KZN Wildlife<br />

To enrol Alkantstrand as a pilot Blue flag beach in 2012, and to receive full Blue Flag<br />

status from 2013 onwards.<br />

To develop a fully-operational passenger liner terminal and multi-purpose facility in<br />

the Port of Richards Bay by 2020<br />

To host a first beach music festival in the district by the end of 2013 and annually<br />

thereafter<br />

To develop a fully-fledged kids tourist attraction in the district by the end of 2013<br />

To establish a safe, dedicated tourism precinct in the Tuzi Gazi/Alkantstrand area by<br />

2016<br />

To Initiate tours of the area as soon as the end of 2012<br />

To begin construction work on the development in 2013 and complete the centre by<br />

the end of 2014.<br />

To have fully operational Canopy Tours in one of <strong>uThungulu</strong>’s <strong>for</strong>ests (preferably<br />

Dlinza) by the end of 2013.<br />

Development of Siyaya <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> To, in conjunction with KZN Wildlife, immediately develop this hiking route to be<br />

Page 103 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Hiking Trail<br />

Accommodation<br />

development at Nseleni<br />

Nature Reserve<br />

Development of Great<br />

Forests of Zululand Tour<br />

Development of a Big Five<br />

Reserve<br />

Development of a coastal<br />

resort<br />

Establishment of the Zulu<br />

Coast Brand (refer to<br />

Marketing <strong>Strategy</strong>)<br />

Construction of the Zulu<br />

Coast tourism website<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>; KZN<br />

Wildlife<br />

uMhlatuze<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>; KZN<br />

Wildlife<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>; KZN<br />

Wildlife<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>; Private<br />

Sector<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>;<br />

Dokodweni<br />

Community; Private<br />

Sector<br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>; TKZN<br />

useable by mid-2013.<br />

To develop accommodation (six units initially) to supplement the conference facilities<br />

by 2014<br />

To launch the Great Forests of Zuluand Tour by the end of 2012<br />

To have a Big Five Reserve with accommodation in the district by the year 2015<br />

To develop an attractive coastal resort in <strong>uThungulu</strong> by 2016<br />

To unveil the Zulu Coast branding of <strong>uThungulu</strong>, together with promotional material<br />

by 2012<br />

To have a fully functioning website linked to accommodation establishments and TKZN<br />

by 2012<br />

Page 104 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

Appendix A – Maps and Images<br />

A1 – JOLLY RUBINO HIKE<br />

Page 105 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

(top)<br />

SIYAYA HIKE<br />

Page 106 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

A2 – TOURISM NODES<br />

Page 107 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

A3 – NHLABANE CORRIDOR<br />

Page 108 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

A4 – GREAT FORESTS ROUTE (clockwise; Dlinza Forest; Mpushini Falls; Nkandla Forest, Ongoye Forest)<br />

Page 109 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by Graham Muller Associates<br />

A5 – RBM’S TISAND AREA (AREA AVAILABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT)<br />

Page 110 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

Appendix B – Policy and Legislation<br />

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 as adopted on 8 May 1996 and amended on 11 October<br />

1996<br />

The Constitution sets out the internal arrangements, proceedings and procedures of provincial<br />

legislatures. In this regard the following sections are of relevance:<br />

“Section 116. (1) sets out that a provincial legislature may:<br />

a. determine and control its internal arrangements, proceedings and procedures; and<br />

b. make rules and orders concerning its business, with due regard to representative and participatory<br />

democracy, accountability, transparency and public involvement.<br />

Schedule 4 sets out the Functional Areas of Concurrent National and Provincial Legislative Competence.<br />

In Part A it identified <strong>Tourism</strong> at a Provincial level and in Part B Local <strong>Tourism</strong> as outlined in section<br />

155(6)(a) and (7).<br />

Section 155 (6)(a) and (7) sets out the following:<br />

(6) Each provincial government must establish municipalities in its province in a manner consistent with<br />

the legislation enacted in terms of subsections (2) and (3) and, by legislative or other measures, must:<br />

a. provide <strong>for</strong> the monitoring and support of local government in the province; and<br />

b. promote the development of local government capacity to enable municipalities to per<strong>for</strong>m their<br />

functions and manage their own affairs.<br />

(7) The National government, subject to section 44, and the provincial governments have the legislative<br />

and executive authority to see to the effective per<strong>for</strong>mance by municipalities of their functions in<br />

respect of matters listed in Schedules 4 and 5, by regulating the exercise by municipalities of their<br />

executive authority referred to in section 156(1).<br />

Page 111 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

Of relevance to the role of municipalities to be outlined later in the Policy, it is worth noting the<br />

following:<br />

126. A Member of the Executive Council of a province may assign any power or function that is to be<br />

exercised or per<strong>for</strong>med in terms of an Act of Parliament or a provincial Act, to a Municipal Council.<br />

An assignment:<br />

a. must be in terms of an agreement between the relevant Member of the Executive Council and<br />

the Municipal Council;<br />

b. must be consistent with the Act in terms of which the relevant power or function is exercised<br />

or per<strong>for</strong>med; and<br />

c. takes effect upon proclamation by the Premier.”<br />

Intergovernmental Relations Act (Act No. 13, 10 August 2005)<br />

The Intergovernmental Relations Act establishes a framework <strong>for</strong> the national government, provincial<br />

governments and local governments to promote and facilitate intergovernmental relations.<br />

Of relevance to the <strong>Tourism</strong> Policy development process described in Section 36 of the Act, which sets<br />

out that when developing provincial policies or draft legislation affects the local sphere of government<br />

in a province, the provincial government must:<br />

a. take into account national priorities;<br />

b. take into account the interests of local communities in the province; and<br />

c. consult the local sphere of government in the province and any specifically affected<br />

municipalities.<br />

Page 112 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

National <strong>Tourism</strong> Act 1993 (and amendments 1996, 1998, 2000)<br />

The <strong>Tourism</strong> Act makes provision <strong>for</strong>:<br />

i. the promotion of tourism to and in the Republic;<br />

ii. the further regulation and rationalization of the tourism industry;<br />

iii. measures aimed at the maintenance and enhancement of the standards of facilities and<br />

services hired out or made available to tourists; and<br />

iv. the co-ordination and rationalization, as far as practicable, of the activities of persons who<br />

are active in the tourism industry;<br />

v. to establish a grading and classification scheme in respect of accommodation establishments,<br />

the membership of which shall be voluntary;<br />

vi. to authorize the Minister to establish schemes <strong>for</strong> prescribed sectors of the tourism industry,<br />

the membership of which shall be voluntary;<br />

vii. to make provision <strong>for</strong> the registration of tourist guides;<br />

viii. to prohibit any person to act <strong>for</strong> gain as a tourist guide unless he has been registered as a<br />

tourist guide in terms of the Act.<br />

White Paper on the Development and Promotion of <strong>Tourism</strong> In South Africa- May, 1996<br />

The <strong>Tourism</strong> White paper in<strong>for</strong>med the roles envisaged of the various partners in <strong>Tourism</strong>. In the first<br />

instance, it set out and entrenched the principle that <strong>Tourism</strong> must be: Government led, private sector<br />

driven, and community based.<br />

In addition the roles and relationships between the various tiers of government were set out in broad<br />

terms.<br />

“The Role of provincial government was seen as a critically important role to play in the development<br />

and promotion of the tourism industry of South Africa. The provincial tourism organisations are key<br />

players in the tourism industry. The provincial government has responsibility <strong>for</strong> all of the functions<br />

indicated at the national government level (facilitation, co-ordination, regulation, monitoring and<br />

Page 113 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

development promotion) with a few exceptions, additions and modifications. Provincial tourism<br />

organisations will <strong>for</strong>mulate tourism policies which are applicable to their areas, in accordance with<br />

the national policy. They will also be partners in the implementation of relevant national policies,<br />

strategies, and objectives.”<br />

The provincial government, through provincial tourism organisations, have the responsibility <strong>for</strong><br />

marketing and promoting their destinations”. This is particularly relevant in regard to marketing the<br />

province to the domestic market where provinces compete against each other.<br />

In regard to “International marketing, the national and provincial tourism organisations should agree on<br />

a strong, effective marketing strategy; to be coordinated at the national level and executed with the<br />

participation and support of the provincial organisations. This may not imply the promotion of separate<br />

brand identities by provinces, but possibly a number of strong product lines (e.g. ecotourism, culture<br />

tourism, sports tourism) which are applicable across provincial boundaries.<br />

This approach is recommended providing that it does not exclude provincial initiatives in markets that<br />

they wish to develop independently and where national presence is nonexistent”.<br />

The role of the Province, as set out in the <strong>Tourism</strong> White Paper, is to:<br />

i. “develop a common strategy <strong>for</strong> the international marketing and promotion of South Africa as<br />

a joint ef<strong>for</strong>t among the private sector, the national organisation and provincial authorities,<br />

taking cognisance of international trends and the competitive environment;<br />

ii. fund international marketing ef<strong>for</strong>ts from private sector, national and provincial resources;<br />

iii. participate in supporting the international marketing ef<strong>for</strong>t by the national body;<br />

iv. play a more prominent role in tourism development activities, than the national government.<br />

This should include the involvement of local communities, environmental management, safety<br />

and security of visitors, tourism plant development, infrastructure provision, etc.<br />

v. ensure budgets and resources allocated to provinces reflect this reality”.<br />

The role of local government includes:<br />

Page 114 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

i. responsible land-use planning, urban and rural development;<br />

ii. control over land-use and land allocation;<br />

iii. provision and maintenance of tourist services, sites and attractions, e.g. camping and caravan<br />

sites, recreational facilities (parks, historical buildings, sports facilities, theatres, museums, etc.)<br />

and public services;<br />

iv. provision of road signs in accordance with nationally established guidelines;<br />

v. market and promote specific local attractions and disseminate in<strong>for</strong>mation in this regard;<br />

vi. control public health and safety;<br />

vii. facilitate the participation of local communities in the tourism industry;<br />

viii. own and maintain certain plant, e.g. ports and airports;<br />

ix. provide adequate parking, also <strong>for</strong> coaches;<br />

x. facilitate the establishment of appropriate public transportation services, e.g. taxi services;<br />

xi. license establishments in accordance with national framework;<br />

xii. promote and financially support the establishment of local publicity associations /<br />

community tourism and marketing organisations to facilitate, market, coordinate and<br />

administer tourism initiatives.”<br />

It is not intended that local government provide services that can be provided by the<br />

private sector.<br />

The Kwazulu-Natal <strong>Tourism</strong> Act, 1996 (as amended, including No. 2 of 2002)<br />

The KZN <strong>Tourism</strong> Act provides <strong>for</strong> the establishment of bodies to develop, promote and market tourism<br />

in KwaZulu-Natal within the framework of government policy.<br />

Section 30 of the Act sets out that the “Functions of Provincial <strong>Tourism</strong>” must be specified in provincial<br />

tourism policy including, but not limited to, the following core areas:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

international tourism marketing<br />

national tourism marketing<br />

planning, development and promotion of tourism products <strong>for</strong> the Province<br />

Page 115 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

<br />

<br />

implementation of national and provincial tourism policies<br />

integrated marketing and development of the tourism industry in the Province<br />

Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003.<br />

The BBBEE Act was promulgated, amongst other issues, to:<br />

i. establish a legislative framework <strong>for</strong> the promotion of black economic empowerment;<br />

ii. to empower the Minister to issue codes of good practice; and<br />

iii. to publish trans<strong>for</strong>mation charters.<br />

In addition to promote the purposes of the Act, the Minister may by notice in the Gazette issue codes of<br />

good practice on black economic empowerment that may include:<br />

a. the further interpretation and definition of broad-based black economic empowerment and<br />

the interpretation and definition of different categories of black empowerment entities;<br />

b. qualification criteria <strong>for</strong> preferential purposes <strong>for</strong> procurement and other economic activities;<br />

c. indicators to measure broad-based black economic empowerment;<br />

d. the weighting to be attached to broad-based black economic empowerment indicators<br />

referred to in paragraph (c);<br />

e. guidelines <strong>for</strong> stakeholders in the relevant sectors of the economy to draw up trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

charters <strong>for</strong> their sector; and<br />

f. any other matter necessary to achieve the objectives of this Act.<br />

Section 12 of the Act makes provision <strong>for</strong> the Minister to publish in the Gazette <strong>for</strong> general in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

and promote a trans<strong>for</strong>mation charter <strong>for</strong> a particular sector of the economy, if the Minister is satisfied<br />

that the charter:<br />

a. has been developed by major stakeholders in that sector; and<br />

b. advances the objectives of this Act.<br />

Page 116 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

The BEE Charter <strong>for</strong> the <strong>Tourism</strong> sector has been developed and launched in May 2005. It sets out<br />

targets <strong>for</strong> a mid – term by 2009 and a set of targets <strong>for</strong> 2014 in relation to:<br />

i. Ownership;<br />

ii. Strategic Representation;<br />

iii. Employment Equity;<br />

iv. Skills development;<br />

v. Preferential procurement;<br />

vi. Enterprise development;<br />

vii. Social Development and industry specific interventions.<br />

White Paper on the Development and Promotion of <strong>Tourism</strong> in KwaZulu-Natal (March 2008)<br />

The White Paper on the Development and Promotion of <strong>Tourism</strong> in KwaZulu-Natal was commissioned<br />

by the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Arts, Culture and <strong>Tourism</strong> to develop a provincial strategic policy<br />

that is going to provide foundation and competitive strategies <strong>for</strong><br />

KwaZulu-Natal linked to existing and provincial strategies.<br />

Integrated Development Planning<br />

Local municipalities in South Africa have to use "integrated development planning" as a method to plan<br />

future development in their areas. Apartheid planning left South Africa with cities and towns that:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Had racially divided business and residential areas<br />

Were badly planned to cater <strong>for</strong> the poor - with long travelling distances to work and poor<br />

access to business and other services<br />

Had great differences in level of services between rich and poor areas<br />

Integrated Development Planning is an approach to planning that involves the entire municipality and its<br />

citizens in finding the best solutions to achieve good long-term development. <strong>Tourism</strong> must, at a local<br />

Page 117 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

level, engage in this process. An Integrated Development Plan is a master plan <strong>for</strong> an area that gives an<br />

overall framework <strong>for</strong> development. It aims to co-ordinate the work of local and other spheres of<br />

government in a coherent plan to improve the quality of life <strong>for</strong> all the people living in an area. It should<br />

take into account the existing conditions and problems and resources available <strong>for</strong> development. The<br />

plan should look at economic and social development <strong>for</strong> the area as a whole. It must set a framework<br />

<strong>for</strong> how land should be used, what infrastructure and services are needed and how the environment<br />

should be protected. All municipalities have to produce an Integrated Development Plan (IDP). The<br />

municipality is responsible <strong>for</strong> the co-ordination of the IDP and must draw in other stakeholders in the<br />

area who can impact on and/or benefit from development in the area.<br />

Once the IDP is drawn up all municipal planning and projects should happen in terms of that IDP.<br />

The annual council budget should be based on the IDP. Other government departments working in the<br />

area would also be well-advised to take the IDP into account when making their own plans.<br />

Page 118 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

Other legislation of relevance to tourism planning includes:<br />

Town Planning Ordinance No. 27 of 1949<br />

KwaZulu-Natal Land Affairs act No. 11 of 1992<br />

Conservation of Agriculture Resources Act No. 43 of 1983<br />

Water Act No. 54 of 1956<br />

Seashore Act No. 21 of 1935<br />

Environment Conservation Act<br />

Mountain Catchment Areas Act No. 63 of 1970<br />

National Parks Act<br />

Physical Planning Act No. 125 of 1991<br />

Share Block Control Scheme of 1980<br />

AMAFA Act<br />

Prevention of Illegal Eviction From and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998<br />

Restitution of Land Rights Act 3 of 1996<br />

Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997 (ESTA)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mal Protection of In<strong>for</strong>mal Lands Rights Act 31 of 1996<br />

Communal Property Associations Act 28 of 1996<br />

Amendment of the Upgrading of Land Tenure Rights Act 112 of 1991<br />

Distribution and Transfer of certain State Land Act 119 of 1993<br />

Land Titles Adjustment Act 111 of 1993<br />

Page 119 of 120


<strong>Revised</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong> <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>uThungulu</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- prepared by G<br />

Appendix C –List of Possible Emergency Scenarios<br />

WHAT COULD BE SCENARIOS FOR WHICH PLANS MAY HAVE TO BE COMPILED?<br />

The following list contains (most of the possible) scenarios, depending on where an event is held, type of<br />

facilities and <strong>for</strong> what purpose.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Severe storms during event.<br />

Possible flooding of key areas/installations.<br />

Delays in starting of event.<br />

Unruly behavior of spectators/delegates, etc.<br />

Fires (at event or in close proximity to venue/stadium)<br />

Mass casualties (however caused)<br />

Protection of V.I.P.’s<br />

Possible bomb threats.<br />

Heat waves.<br />

Major disruption in electricity supply (or other essential services: i.e. water supply; sewer<br />

system; refuse removal).<br />

Rumours.<br />

Armed action/attacks.<br />

Hostage situations<br />

Collapsed facilities.<br />

Access control, including restricting access and more turning up then what could be<br />

accommodated.<br />

Vehicular (access and egress) control.<br />

Major accident impacting on event<br />

Disruption in transport system.(busses; trains; taxis; whatever the cause)<br />

Breakdown in essential communication systems.<br />

Emergency evacuation.<br />

Explosions (however caused)<br />

Un<strong>for</strong>eseen cancellation (during event).<br />

Food poisoning outbreak.<br />

Protests near event.<br />

Hazardous or poisonous gasses released (however caused and not necessary at event)<br />

Extensive panic amongst spectators/delegates<br />

Treatment of known trauma cases (over an extended period)<br />

Last minute cancellations (be<strong>for</strong>e start of event).<br />

Strikes by municipal and /or other key services.<br />

Planning to ensure accessibility to residence adjacent to or within possible impact zone of<br />

stadium.<br />

(Compiled by Henk van Elst and updated 2 November 2009 after consulting with various departments)<br />

Page 120 of 120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!